Tony Leung did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning CANNES, for portraying Chow Mo-wan in In the Mood For Love.
In The Mood For Love follows the relationship between two neighbors whose spouses are having an affair with each other.
The description of that plot is one that may be that for salacious melodrama, which is something severely rejected by Wong Kar-wai's approach to this story. A story that is about little moments rather than big scenes, gestures rather than declarations. The opening sequence we see two new couples moving into a cramped apartment through different doors whose furniture is frequently mistaken for each other's, and we see a matter of fact life of the two central characters of Leung's Chow Mo-wan, and of his neighbor Su Li-zhen aka Mrs. Chan (Maggie Cheung). The initial scenes like that of the furniture emphasize this all the more, though as much as they are sort of just normal life moment scenes, we are granted the nature of the characters within their lives. We see Cheung's Su going about her life as a secretary and seeing about her husband, whom we only ever hear or see just the brief glimpse of what seems to be his back at some point. The same is true for Chow who we see at his work at closing time, occasionally conversing with his friends, and sometimes seeing after his wife. There is a key within Leung's performance, and perhaps contrasting to what we see in Cheung's performance, where we see more so the discovery of what will be the affair, there are indicators of the awareness of the nature of his wife much earlier on within Leung's performance. Leung has a quiet sombernes in the moments of wherever he is, and Leung creates the sense of a man which is weighing on his mind. When his friend for example notes his wife's prettiness, Leung's reaction is that of a burden in reacting to the thought rather than any kind of comfort to him.
The affair unfolds around the two, to the point spouses go on "separate" trips leaving Chow and Su alone. One of those little moments of the film coming after this point where separately each go to a food stand to get a meal outside of the comfort of their home and without their spouses, Su picking up a meal and Chow eating at the stand, passing each other with gentle cordiality though no more. And rarely will you see such pain in a man when eating a perfectly fine meal than what is exuding from Leung as he eats his dumpling. Which brings us to the specific nature of Leung as a performer, and his role within the scheme of the film. Leung's performance is extremely minimalistic as he performs the part of Chow as a man who does not appear to wear his emotions on his sleeve in terms of the standard definition, however this isn't a case of a simple repression rather an accentuation on the modesty and withdrawn nature. Leung's presentation is fascinating because he does wear the emotions just not in the way expected, rather much like the film itself his performance is all about the smallness of his performance, looking for the little moments to find the reality of the character. Even in that dumpling moment, his pain is present, but limited, you can see closely in the man, however hidden within the man's modest approach to his existence.
There is a contrast between the early interactions of Su and Chow, that go beyond just neighborly passive hellos. There is the false version of this where the two discuss the affair their spouses are having and the two essentially decide to do a mock version of the affair themselves. Cheung and Leung's performance here is a little more performative than anything as you see the complicated layers as the two order for each other at a restaurant, since they don't know each other's spouses and pretend to have "an affair" themselves. There's a mix of joy and tension that comes and goes within the expressions of each performer as you see them move between ideas so naturally, of having the fun of playing this pretend as a kind of revenge, that is waved away though at other times as this sadness alludes to their painful situation, but also another quality where in certain glances the intention no longer is pretend but real. Both actors are amazing because as unnatural of a display as it is in some ways, they make it unnatural in creating the performance of it, but so very natural in expressing the underlying emotions that are pushing them into these actions that we see waver between an emotional pain and a connection. Something that only goes so far as we have the key gesture of Chow trying to touch Su's hand, that is fully genuine in Leung's performance.
The complication of that sequence contrasts strongly by the moments of Su and Chow connecting over their mutual love of martial arts serials. Something that begins as just a friendly interaction of two neighbors sharing their collection of items that they just happen to both love as a diversion. These scenes that begin with just expressing their interest, then progressing to Chow writing his own serials, with support from Su are perhaps the most direct love sequences between them in a most remarkable way. These moments of interaction are indeed without the complication of any affairs, or reaction to betrayals or anything of the ilk, rather each performer just shows two people absolutely loving to share their passion with one another. These scenes are wonderful because neither Leung and Cheung make them complicated in the way they articulated that previous sequence, they just rather are so direct in these moments. The joy in each is just that much honest expression of this, and the joy we see only grows in the way they find each other to love this together so strongly. We see the two without their reserve in these scenes because the two are essentially able to declare their love for one another, just through the calm and ease of their interaction and expressing their passion for the martial arts serial. Something that could sound even silly, yet both actors make it so very real, and really something truly sweet and actualized within the scheme of a film about not taking that extra step, we see each unfettered so poignantly through these casual conversations.
We witness the progression of the relationship through the two contrasting types of scenes of the "play acting" and the writing of the serial, each scene showing that connection in the latter, but in the former both actors are absolutely brilliant in the way we see this way they become both more intense yet more guarded at the same time. The moments between them, which truly are moments of glancing, often not directly looking at one another, or making certain false movements of playing the affair, we see a fascinating reverse in each performance. Leung and Cheung make the internalized attraction between them that much more potent in the glances, yet their body language brings that same intensity as they maintain the defense. The two show the conflicting thoughts of each in every moment and you see both wanting to, needing to take the next step in their eyes, yet creating that physical stiffness trying to protect each other from fully embracing the strange danger of these feelings. The two never make that step more, yet the performers are essential, along with Wong of course, in creating that essential emotional tension that is all about how the string holding back their relationship is so taut it is about to break, with each playing on that very edge of the break without ever going beyond it. The closest instead is only Chow embracing Su, not in loving making, rather just reaffirming hold as she breaks down, that is all about their love even as they still hold back even in this moment. The closing scenes of the film are the two separate again, though all asking about the other, and again the power of Leung's work is what he's doing just within the surface. The pivotal moment being his visiting the apartment building they shared once, and his looking down at Su's old apartment one last time. It is only a couple seconds long, yet tremendous in its impact, because the nuanced expression speaks to such volumes of all that Chow is holding back, wishing for her in the moment but also accepting of the sad silence of his life. The classic final scene, classic in terms of a Wong surprise switch, being Chow visiting Cambodia and performing a ritual of putting something important into a wall with mud. A completely dialogue-free scene but essential within Leung's performance. Because within the scene, Leung's physicality has an openness as you see the revealing his secret to the hole, and in the moment you see that freeness within Leung as admits the truth, though no one can hear it. Leung's work here is a performance I've always liked but perhaps have taken for granted to a degree. A benefit of these reviews is that it forces me to look closer, sometimes that is less favorable but sometimes it reveals much more in terms of what the actor is doing. Naturally, with as modest, subtle and withdrawn as this performance is, Leung's work here is such a performance. A performance that is heartbreaking and intensely emotional, despite not shedding a single tear or raising his voice once. Yet never do you feel disconnected for a moment from Chow's journey, the opposite is in fact the truth, it resonates so powerfully, and while Wong conducts those essential moments to center us on Leung, Leung brings into the fundamental intimacy of this tremendous personal journey.
18 comments:
Delighted he's been upgraded to a 5, that ending kills me every time. Love that Wong is your new Director win, could I have your updated ranking of his films?
Tahmeed:
1. In the Mood For Love
2. Happy Together
3. Chungking Express
4. As Tears Go By
5. Days of Being Wild
6. The Grandmaster
7. Ashes of Time
Louis: Has Maggie Cheung gone up and where would you rank her now.
So are we getting a bonus Treat Williams review?
Luke:
Yes, #2.
Robert:
I'm going to lean towards probably, particularly given the nomination delay.
A satisfying upgrade. Love to see it.
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Maisy Stella & Aubrey Plaza in My Old Ass and the cast of Better Man?
Finally the post that many were waiting for from Louis. I think Leung will be #2 in the ranking.
Anonymous:
Stella - 3(Reminded me in some scenes of Fred Hechinger which is not a good thing, but the same kind of "smiling so called acting" in moments that just I found more than a little grating. Thankfully there were moments where I wasn't reminded of the lesser of the two twin Emperors, where she at least settled to an okay coming of age rhythm essentially. Playing enough reality into the emotions in certain moments, though I'll say the performance never exactly rose above anything more than just fine on the whole.)
Plaza - 4(In it way less than everything about the film's marketing would suggest, but she comes in like a pro for her couple of scenes and bits of voice over. Plaza sells the comedy with an expected ease and for me thankfully picked up some of the moments where I found Stella's performance a bit on the grating side. But as also typical form the one scene where she needs to sell a lot in just a moment, Plaza absolutely delivers on with an absolute ease as you get all the history of what happened with her character in a moment's notice.)
Williams - (As noted like Jean Shepherd in his commentary however instead it is this cheeky more than a little self loathing commentary on the events as they unfold. And he does so quite effectively in terms of punctuating a lot of moments with his voice to grant you a sense of the self commentary built upon the idea of noting the mistakes more than anything.)
Davies - (Kind of an interesting set up for a performance in that really just the fact that he's the chimp really does much for it to begin with. But Davies's work through motion capture and his own vocal performance, rather much goes along with Williams's narration in not exactly creating a disconnect between the two. And unlike say Serkis with Planet of the Apes, this is less about looking for the emotion within the CGI creation accepting it as the film's reality but in this instance kind of accepting the Ape as a part of just the setup of this strange purposefully distorted reality. And his performance I suppose grounds that idea because he never exactly plays it less than straightforward making it so you oddly just buy the chimp for Williams.)
Pemberton - (Relatively standard dad performance however he
delivers it well without going too far with certain moments of being the neglectful wretch and the moments where he does seem to care Pemberton delivers on with a decent impact.)
Mulvany - (Again as the supportive mother role, does do a reinvention but does a fine iteration as such, particularly given she's playing against a CGI ape, you believe she loves that CGI ape.)
Steadman - (As the extra supportive grandmother left less of an impact that I would've hoped for given particular moments related to it and I'd say she's only just okay though certainly not bad.)
Herriman - (Fine rendition of playing into the slimy manager routine and has some particularly good reaction shots in just showing his intense level of exasperation at Williams throughout.)
Banno - (Has rather convincing chemistry with a chimp to say the least and it is absolutely easy to buy into the whirlwind romance, as she brings such an easy warmth and sincerity despite the theoretical ludicrousness of the setup. And as much as the film montages what is her most dramatic element, what we do get for her in those moments grants the sense of gravity needed for them.)
Louis: Who'd be your choices to play John Denver and Tim & Jeff Buckley in biopics.
Hey guys
I know this question is late, but better than never: tell me your 10 movies of 2025 that you are looking forward to seeing? Mine are:
1. The Battle of Baktan Cross
2. Mickey 17
3. Mission Impossible – The Final Reckoning
4. Bugonia
5. Sentimental Value
6. Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery
7. Love Hurts
8. Superman
9. The Naked Gun
10.Highest 2 Lowest
I'll predict Leung for 3rd in the 2000 Lead ranking.
There's a bit of a rumor going round that Baktan Cross might get pushed back to 2026 which I hope isn't true.
Well Michael wasn't kidding when it came to the Last Showgirl. This film is terrible. We do not need to stop the presses every time a performer not known to be a great actor delivers an okay performance because Anderson is just okay, she's not great. We also need to create a restraining order between Jamie Lee Curtis and an Oscar nomination because she's actively bad here, playing one note hard, heavy and to ill-effect. But the script is the worst part here, because 90% of it is the same conversation about Anderson's character being challenged about her delusion regarding her Nudie showgirl show by another character, and then it happens again and again and again. Elsewhere there is the most cliched of mother daughter relationships, with also that same conversation happening a few times. We get some random tangents that truly go nowhere when it attempts to develop the other characters, leading to nothing remarkable as it leads to a climactic scene that is absolutely meaningless. But hey, there are also some Sean Baker ripoff shots of Anderson standing around different places in Vegas, often poorly shot. And really this whole film is an example of how not to do a Sean Baker ripoff.
Anderson - 3.5
Curtis - 1.5
Bautista - 3.5
Song - 2.5
Shipka - 2.5
Lourd - 2(Horribly miscast as a 22 year old)
Schwartzman - 3.5(MVP, not even kidding)
Louis: Thoughts on Bautista and Schwartzman.
Luke:
Bautista - (Would've been a 4, along with Anderson but there's a revelation the film throws in a VERY STUPID ONE, that is completely missing from their performances and I'd it is more likely bad direction there, but there should've been immediate history there yet there's not. Bautista though offers his unique presence nicely the rest of the time, in just bringing the gentle giant type approach where he has this honest sincerity in the way he approaches everything even though when you break the guy down he's just a stage manager of a strip show. Bautista brings a natural warmth that is nicely realized, and I hope he find a better written version of this character some time.)
Schwarztman - (Thought he briefly made the film come to life by managing not to play the sleaze so obviously in a character that could've been very obvious. Now that's still there, but Schwartzman dances on the edge of some degree of empathy at first, creating the sense of building frustration before his character just let's Anderson's have it, with pure venom. However Schwartzman nicely, in just one scene, builds to that cutting deep when he does, yet does so in a way where he feels more than just a device despite being one script wise.)
Louis: Your thoughts on the rest of the cast of The Last Showgirl?
Lucas:
Anderson - (What she manages to do is be charismatic enough onscreen her, she's not stiff, she's not awkward nor is she doing typical shtick. She's convincing enough, which hey that's a win in the sense that she gives a fine performance. Beyond that though she is working with such tired material that it is hard for to ever really get going anywhere. Most of the time she has to play the same delusional note on defending her show which she does decently, then play upset when people keep calling her out on it. She plays these two notes well enough, though that's all the film really gives her again and again. She doesn't have any one scene where she really goes for broke to something extraordinary, but she's consistently fine with the repetitive material. Although again the film bungles her interactions with Bautista, but again I do put that more on the direction.)
Curtis - (She successfully played a hot mess in The Bear both in season 2 and season 3. She basically goes for the same general thing here, except turning it all up to eleven, losing any nuance, pathos or depth, and trying to be funny I think? Well she's not amusing, she's just kind of loud and over the top, and plays into almost purposefully grotesquery that just made her character seem more cartoon than person. Every scene she's in the performance is obvious and there's no sense of the internalization behind the performance. It is just acting to sort of play "ugly face", in a way I found rather unpleasant and not in the way that was intended.)
Song & Shipka - (They're both okayish. They have moments where they go too big with some of their outrage, other moments where they have something slightly authentic with Anderson going. There's no consistency whatsoever, again the writing limits them as well but there was potential here largely wasted.)
Lourd - (The funny thing is she looks too old to be 22 years old here, but she also plays it as though she also presents herself as an extremely insecure teenager, leading to a very strange presence here to begin with where she's playing it too young, while being too old for the part. Doesn't help that I found too often she brought so little energy to so many scenes that she seemed barely able to register a pulse let alone get a sense of years if dissatisfaction with her mother, or a quiet need for her, or anything really. I didn't buy the relationship for a second, even as a broken one, and despite Anderson trying Lourd does not.)
Post a Comment