Saturday, 28 December 2024

Alternate Best Actor 2010: Philip Seymour Hoffman in Jack Goes Boating

Philip Seymour Hoffman did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying the titular character of Jack Goes Boating.

Jack Goes Boating is Philip Seymour Hoffman's only film he directed about two couples and their growth or lack of growth over time. 

Hoffman himself plays Jack, the male half of one of the two potential couples, as he gets set up by his friend couple, Clyde (John Ortiz) and Lucy (Daphne Rubin-Vega), with the off-beat Connie (Amy Ryan). The film is very stagy, and attempts non-staginess, as we either get long conversational scenes ideal for stage, off-set by very obvious attempts to not be stagy which unfortunately are mainly musical montages that don't do all that much other than breakup the scenes. Hoffman is a performer I never mind seeing another film from because it means I get to see that much more of an actor who left us all far too young, and that is the case again here in Jack Goes Boating. I like seeing Hoffman as Jack, mainly because I like Hoffman so much, but I wouldn't say this role or this performance is exactly his biggest challenge, in fact I ponder if he chose this material for his attempt at directing because it didn't ask that much of him in the lead role. As Jack he's kind of a Marty type sad sack, who is a little lost in love and otherwise is just a workaday guy who we frequently see somewhat passively move through his life as limo driver. Hoffman was a great actor though, so even in that passiveness Hoffman does bring a sense of the man building this barrier of attempts protection for himself as he deals with questions that make him feel uncomfortable, such as his relationship status, but also being slightly more open when talking about something comforting like his reason for liking Reggae music with his friend Clyde. Hoffman is convincing, and even likable in his modesty that it certainly is believable at a moment's notice. 

The central relationship theoretically is where you think is going to be the big challenge for Jack, but it isn't really that. Hoffman mostly brings this modesty there too in his chemistry with Ryan, who is actually giving a fairly atypical performance from her as a more overt eccentric, and Hoffman often is the facilitator and the giver in these scenes together. Which makes sense as the director, and to Hoffman's credit it is believable in the way he constructs Jack to want to please as he can in a very gentle and humble way. He creates the easy sense of appreciation for the opportunity of the relationship and has a natural chemistry with Ryan by letting her go a bit bigger while he balances that with his smallness most of the time. I write most of the time because the one aspect we do get of Jack that is against the rest of his behavior is when something goes wrong or someone purposefully hassles him. There he will suddenly break out in anger and emotional distress. Something that again, Hoffman plays very well in performing it very much as this release valve of someone who contains too much so when there is something that wounds that state Hoffman reveals that extreme reaction. It doesn't feel like a break in the rest of the man, just a natural aspect of who this guy is and what he has been keeping inside. Otherwise we see Jack prepare to go boating by learning how to swim which Hoffman just plays as a dutiful task in a curious preparation to eventually go boating with Connie as a random dating option the two discussed equally as randomly. All of this doesn't lead to all that much other than one more emotional breakdown as Jack, training with cooking as well, burns a dish and has one more outburst. Again well performed as the man just losing his tight grip, that is though satiated by Connie, which Hoffman delivers as Jack using her calm as a way for Jack to find his bearings again. Hoffman gives a good performance, I liked seeing one more turn from him as always, but a great turn from him this is not. 

69 comments:

Shaggy Rogers said...

Luke and everyone: unranked guess of which actors will be in Louis' Top 5 both lead and supporting of 2024? My predictions:

Supporting
Guy Pearce
Edward Norton
Yura Borisov
Adam Pearson
Jeremy Strong

Lead
Adrien Brody
Daniel Craig
George MacKay
Cillian Murphy
Nicholas Hoult (Nosferatu)

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Damn, this is the most underwhelming backlog lineup so far, I was hoping for a 4.5.

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast?

Luke Higham said...

Shaggy: In any other year I probably would but quite frankly I'd rather enjoy the ride without thinking about it

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Taking advantage of this post, tell us which are the best films directed by people who had their only experience behind the camera? Directors who had their One Film Only.

Luke Higham said...

Ytrewq: I didn't have high hopes for this to begin with. Only had interest in Leung and Cumming. Hopefully we'll have a far stronger one next year.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Luke: Ok, I'll ask later.

Luke Higham said...

Also, Owen, Hoffman and Gallo had been on the backburner for the last 3 years or more so I get why he decided to do them first.

Shaggy: Ask for them both on the penultimate or last reviews from their respective lineups and I'll give an answer then.

Anonymous said...

Louis: category placement for Harris Dickinson for Babygirl?

Tim said...

i saw Deadpool & Wolverine today, and I'm sorry guys, but this was fucking absymal!

Ryan Reynolds is doing his usual Ryan Reynolds thing, and if you like that ... then sorry, we cannot be friends.
Hugh Jackman had essentially the same character arc as in Logan except bad
The relationship between the two was not earned in the slightest
The humor was shite; for every joke that worked there were at least seven that didn't (i saw it drunk in a group of 5, none of us laughed most of the time)
Most side characters did not go beyond "Hey, i have seen that person in a movie 20 years ago! " (and people still wonder about what Scoresese said ...), the equivalent of shining keys waving over a literal goddamn baby!
the action sucked
and most fanservice-cameos still insulted most people's intelligence.

Like, imagine putting comedic genius Channing Tatum in a movie and having all his jokes revolve around his french accent. Riveting!
Imagine putting two charcaters who cannot die against each other in a fight. Inspired!
Imagine making a movie for Marvel Fanboys and making a reference to the movie Sling Blade. Genius! (I asked all my freinds about that, none of them got that)

At least the soundtrack was good. Not in the way it was used, that was mostly shit too, but those are good songs that i would like to listen to without a crappy movie around it ...

Tim said...

sorry, not watching anything with Ryan Reynolds anytime soon. I have given that cinematic equivalent of mental diarrhea enough chances already (mostly because of Buried and literally nothing else), but i feel that if i watched any minute of a camera aimed at his idiotic face any more, i might just have to turn in my degree

Tim said...

for granted, once the credits rolled, saying that that insult to iq-tests had not only produced and written that movie, being credited first on both accounts over a secrence of basically raping the ending of Logan while dancing to Bye Bye Bye, i should have been warned ...

Marcus said...

Tim: I understand you hated the movie, but it's never okay to compare anything to the worst thing someone can do to another person. Do better.

Matt Mustin said...

Yeah, I'm done with Ryan Reynolds too. It's possible that won't be forever, but he's gonna either need to change up what he does completely or just go away altogether for like 5 years.

A said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dirk Richter said...

Shaggy: I know you asked Louis, but I'd suggest The Night of the Hunter.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Rating and thoughts on Buscemi.

Also, the king kong (2005) recommendation came before In The Soup and the last couple of animated films.

Matt Mustin said...

Luke: He's not going in order this time.

Luke Higham said...

Matt: I'm well aware of that.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

I can imagine that at certain point some actor is going to have his own backstage "I cannot sanction your buffonery" moment with Ryan Reynolds.

Perfectionist said...

Shaggy:
Lead
Adrien Brody
Cillian Murphy
Timothee Chalamet(Dune: Part 2)
Sebastian Stan(A Different Man)
Nicholas Hoult

For supporting I don't really have much idea but maybe both Norton and Pearce will be there.

Anonymous said...

Luke, I read from an earlier blog page that you've tallied the number of fives for each category per year. I wonder have you done an all-time overall for each category as well as all 4 combined.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Supporting Actress: 137
Supporting Actor: 366
Leading Actress: 280
Leading Actor: 536
TV/Stage Films - 21
Overall: 1340

Anonymous said...

Shaggy:

Supporting
Jason Bateman
Yura Borisov
Edward Norton
Guy Pearce
Jeremy Strong

Lead
Adrien Brody (My bet is that it will be #1 overall)
Kieran Culkin
Hugh Grant
Nicholas Hoult - Nosferatu
Cillian Murphy

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this live cover of A.R. Rahman's 'Tere Bina' from Guru.
https://youtu.be/qxmVVa-9xls?si=rW_vaHV3Gdj6XnGt
While I know your top 2 for that year is locked, I hope the song makes your Top 5 original song line up for 2007.

Luke Higham said...

If Memoir Of A Snail gets 4 stars then on average, it'll be the best Animated Feature lineup the academy have picked since its inception and even with the remaining unseen nominees from prior years, I highly doubt that'll change.

Michael McCarthy said...

Does anyone else on this blog give Denzel a 5 for Gladiator II? I still can’t stop thinking about how funny he was, he really made that movie his Prince of Thieves.

Michael McCarthy said...

Does anyone else on this blog give Denzel a 5 for Gladiator II? I still can’t stop thinking about how funny he was, he really made that movie his Prince of Thieves.

Luke Higham said...

Michael: He's about a 4.5 for me but I personally wouldn't go any higher.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I'd give him 3.5. He's fun, but also clearly coasting.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Which 10 actors do you think would've benefited from not winning an Oscar. As in performers who felt their shit didn't stink after winning.

Luke Higham said...

Or bad luck.

Matt Mustin said...

Luke: TAIKA WAITITI

Luke Higham said...

Rod Steiger is a prime example for me.

Dirk Richter said...

Louis: Have you been watching any more TV lately, like any of the recommended shows?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

1. The Battle of Baktan Cross (PTA no more needs to be said)
2. Mission Impossible - The Final Reckoning (All for more McQuarrie/Cruise missions).
3. Bugonia (Lanthimos, with a screenplay by one of the writers of Succession and The Menu? Yes please.)
4 & 5. Marty Supreme & The Smashing Machine (Safdies separately doing sports dramas? I'm in to see if they both have it without each other.)
6. Sinners (Great trailers and it will be interesting to see Coogler do something completely away from Marvel or any kind
7. Mickey 17 (Even though it's being treated like a ping pong ball still interested)
8. Hamnet (Buckley and Mescal is enough of a reason. But the misfire of the Eternals has no way soured me on Zhao, and the subject matter on Shakespeare sounds potentially fascinating.)
9. 28 Years Later (Creative team trepidations are trumped by the trailer)
10. Anemone (Though an obviously untested director, a new DDL performance is still a new DDL performance.)

Tony:

1. Shelley Duvall - 3 Women
2. Sissy Spacek - 3 Women
3. Fernanda Montenegro - Central Station
4. Laird Cregar - Hangover Square
5. Gena Rowlands - Opening Night
6. Boris Karloff - The Body Snatcher
7. Geraldine Chaplin - Elisa, Vida Mia
8. Wendy Hiller - I Know Where I'm Going
9. Daniel Auteuil - Manon des Sources
10. Daniel Auteuil - Jean de Florette
11. Erland Josephson - The Sacrifice
12. Irene Papas - Iphigenia
13. Boris Plotnikov - The Ascent
14. Monique Mercure - J.A. Martin Photographer
15. Franka Potente - Run Lola Run
16. Matthew Lillard - SLC Punk
17. Michael Redgrave - Dead of Night
18. Yves Montand - Manon de Sources
19. Gérard Depardieu - Jean de Florette
20. Elodie Bouchez - The Dreamlife of Angels

Louis Morgan said...

Shaggy:

I mean Charles Lauhgton will always be the first mention, though from what I've seen Limite is also a fairly remarkable "one time at bat".

Ytrewq:

Ryan - 4(Such an atypical performance from her because she isn't playing any kind of harder note than is usually the case, and is in some ways playing the eccentric sort of "dream woman" type character though a bit less easy than that. Ryan thought I managed to pull off that eccentricity without overdoing it and found it particularly striking because it is such a different note from her than we are used to.)

Ortiz - 4(An example where his big performance style worked well for the role, as it just finds the right chord to play in the guy who very much wears his emotions on his sleeve constantly in contrast to Hoffman. And his weird upbeat quality, even when making bad choices, brings the right sense to the character who just goes with things, probably not usually in the best of ways. He brings though in that warmth but also tension in creating the sense of the guy who doesn't do what he's doing but will do it anyway.)

Rubin-Vega - 4(Interesting to see her actually get to play a role for once as usually she's used for cameo fodder more than anything, and perhaps here get to see some of her stage appeal. As she brings a great decisiveness in her performance compared to everyone else with the greatest sense of emotional maturity and contemplation in every one of her actions.)

Luke:

Buscemi - (A good straight man performance and Buscemi, like in parting glances, is really good at delivering Indie rambling dialogue without pretense or overt performance. He manages to meld the disparate elements pretty well because he is just so honestly himself in being this somewhat exasperated sort with a quiet passion for his work yet always almost most certainly in over his head at every point. He knows how to play off every other performance and creates the right level of believability on matter how silly it gets at certain moments.)

Anonymous:

Supporting.

Tahmeed:

That's a beautiful rendition, with such an elegance between the orchestra and the choir together that brings such a gentle ease between the elements. With the duets and the solo within the overarching work, surprisingly working well as seemingly yet another instrument to create such a dynamic sincere blend that is calming despite being such a complicated amount of literal musical voices in there. I will say having heard more and more from Rahman, I think it is a shame that "Jai ho" is what he is best known for in America.

Luke:

Taika Waititi
Rod Steiger
Marlon Brando
Russell Crowe (though not due to performance quality rather just personal behavior)
Forest Whitaker
Jared Leto
Melissa Leo
Faye Dunaway
Jennifer Lawrence
Richard Dreyfuss (admits so himself).

Louis Morgan said...

Dirk:

I'll let everyone know when I've finished a given season or series.

Luke Higham said...

I think Brando would've gone the same path if he didn't win for On The Waterfront. He didn't view acting seriously enough as a profession.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

If you look at the behind the scenes info on his film before and after his Oscar win, he did seem like he was trying much harder before and during On the Waterfront with his Oscar win being a clear turning point, as afterwards is when he became so indulgent in both his performances and his onset behavior. And while I'm sure his ego/disregard for acting would've caught up with him eventually, I do think the Oscar acted as a catalyst. As even watch his Oscar speech, there's still humbleness in him as he's genuinely excited in the moment, comparing that to any later interview where he seemed bored by all things, and I think having gotten the highest honor in cinematic acting contributed to that.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on the cast of Nightbitch?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Had Brando won for Streetcar, do you think he gives that performance of Terry Malloy?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Since I’ve been doing my 1980’s kick the last month and a half, have you been surprised by any of my ratings/takes on any of them?

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

Adams - (Like Michael Fassbender has had the unfortunate habit of appearing in the worst of many filmmakers, and this is technically a continuation of that as Heller's worst film. Unlike some of those other examples Adams isn't brought down in the film and actually holds a lot of the film together. Her performance brings a lot of simple realities to many of the scenes of the quiet frustrations of dealing with an isolated motherhood and manages to not go into some of the mawkishness we saw so terribly in, say Hillbilly Elegy. Adams brings a sincerity that does take the film to some of its better scenes, and even the body horror elements, which either needed to go harder or be dropped altogether, she definitely works hard to sell. And to her credit the scenes aren't nearly as embarrassing as they could be. She elevates many moments here, and manages to be good even though the film doesn't entirely work.)

McNairy - (Although has some okay moments in there, falls frequently into a trap where we fail to really see any of what would've been his character's appeal to Adams's character even in the past. He makes it all a bit too thin where there should've been ways to allude to maybe a more interesting or better man lost within a malaise of disinterest.)

Harper - (I'll just say it is nice to see Harper again in so many projects and hope it continues. Another good performance from her however is just offering some quick quiet bits of assertive wisdom with the right glints of constructive warmth behind them.)

Tahmeed:

I think there's a possibility we might not have again if his ego went out of control even earlier. Reading, for example, how much he fought for his performance in Julius Caesar, which is in that post-breakout pre Oscar win period, you get the sense of a still hungry actor who wanted to prove himself. 

Robert:

Well The Color of Money was a bit surprising, Ted. 
But hey, maybe not watching the Hustler does help in that regard. Although if we're talking about the Forest Whitaker scene, that's great stuff. 

Tony Kim said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tony Kim said...

Louis: What are the top 20 best films you saw for the first time this year for the bonus rounds?

Bryan L. said...

Interestingly enough, Taikas’ the only one on that list that won for a non-acting Oscar. Still, given that he was the main force behind Jojo, it most likely convinced him that can do no wrong (regardless of *what* it is.)

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

1. The Ascent
2. Jean de Florette
3. 3 Women
4. Eternity and a Day
5. Run Lola Run
6. The Sacrifice
7. I Know Where I'm Going
8. Buffalo 66
9. Down by Law
10. The Celebration
11. Canal Zone
12. Suspiria
13. The Quiet Family
14. Stroszek
15. Manon of the Spring
16. Opening Night
17. Iphigenia
18. Central Station
19. Dead of Night
20. SLC Punk

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: On Rahman, I think you'll take kindly to his work in Swades, 'Yeh Joh Des Hai Tera' in particular is a beautiful song.

Speaking of Swades, based on what you've seen of Shah Rukh Khan, are there any Hollywood roles you think his presence would be a good fit for? His English is fluent and he has said he's open to working in Hollywood, although probably not in character actor roles like say Anupam Kher.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Yeah, I completely loved Color of Money. Loved the central dynamic of the three principles, loved the cinematography, loved the vibe to it. Obviously I heavily disagree of your dislike of Cruise’s work in it, found him to find the exact right balance of callow and obnoxious. Also, Mastrantonio is my favorite of the Supporting Actress nominees that year.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Sao Paulo Incorporated.

Matt Mustin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Matt Mustin said...

I was absolutely bowled over by The Crying Game. Did not ever expect to love it so much.

Rea-5
Davidson-5
Richardson-4.5
Broadbent-3.5
Dunbar-3
Whitaker-3(Tricky because I think he's actually very good for a lot of it in terms of the emotion, but that accent is *bad*)

Perfectionist said...

Robert: Man, where did your letterboxd go??? The links to your previous one led me to a "Fight Club" pun, that "maybe you just imagined this account"

Robert MacFarlane said...

https://letterboxd.com/robmacfarlane6/

Omar Franini said...

Louis: your thoughts on the cast of The Seed of the Sacred Fig?

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding A Complete Unknown:

You know with Bob Dylan having so many different phases in his life and career, and him meaning so many things to so many different people maybe it would've been better to make a film about him covering those different perspectives through different portrayals of Dylan in different realities and times by different actors weaved together...anyway just a thought. 

Instead we get here is the attempt to tell Dylan's story straight, via James Mangold who previously told the story of Johnny Cash straight with Walk the Line, though backed by the talented Jay Cocks as a screenwriter, sadly this ends up being just as generic as other musical biopics of its ilk. Not that it's bereft of admirable elements, I quite liked the early scenes where we really feel part of the folk scene as we're introduced to Dylan's idols and mentors. These moments feel very tangible and the world seems tangible, and not just part of a checklist of moments to depict. I also appreciated that unlike Bohemian Rhapsody, Walk the Line and Ray, we do see Dylan have the moment of going from not famous to famous, whereas in the other films that just sort of happens and it doesn't seem the characters are even phased by it. But while it avoids some obvious framing devices to be compared to Walk Hard it still suffers from the vagueness of those other films as the film goes on. There is a love triangle between Dylan and the women in his life, but it's all kind of vague with the film never quite biting into it in a real honest raw way. It covers the idea of protest and folk, by mentioning it, but never really doing much with it. The biggest though is the whole Dylan switching to electric, which I was baffled with how the films ends related to that as almost "well that happened" approach. The whole idea, which I believe was the focus of the original concept for the film, seems charged with much drama, but here just kind of becomes a mess, purposefully in part, but also just like it is hard to see what exactly the filmmakers are trying to say with any of it, until one character expresses in one ridiculous and frankly silly way of trying to tie a bow to make the film have an ending. And beyond that the film mostly becomes a playlist movie, which does seem to be the secret of financial success with these movies, but sadly I don't think it makes them particularly compelling. It isn't the worst of these, again I quite liked the first act, but ends up falling into too many of the same traps as the rest. 

Fanning - 3.5
Barbaro - 4
Holbrook - 3.5
McNairy - 3
Fogler - 2.5

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Thoughts on the rest of the cast?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Chagas - 4(Gives a good performance in terms of balancing the different tones by managing to kind of react as part of an overarching burden of intensity. His performance is able to pull them together through this sense of consistency that effectively works so that he never seems completely out of sorts with the swings. He also is good in just sort of driving that internalized intensity as something that builds towards the character's decision at the end of the film. Although this isn't quite a great tension building performance for me, it is definitely a good one.)

Wilma - 4.5(Found her performance quite captivating in just bringing this real charisma to the role, a certain decisiveness within her portrayal that contrasted most effectively against Chagas's portrayal of the man sort of lost within himself. Wilma's contrasting directness is most potent and brings with it the right combination of a sense of the potential in the relationship in their early interactions but also is as compelling in bringing that certain emotional ferociousness as the film proceeds towards its end.)

Omar:

Zareh - (He's lower for me because I think there was potential for a truly great performance here and I think he gives just a good one, though no true disrespect on that. He does effectively portray the moral degradation of his character, bringing a growing intensity within the role as you see him become that much more vicious and hate filled as the progression is made. He does bring the right scariness to his role the further it goes along and any sense of sympathy within his work is leaked away. Why he's not higher for me is I think there was potential to make an even more dramatic arc if he had been a bit more charming, warmer and potentially suggesting a potentially very good person as the history of his character alludes to as a potential early on, then in turn making his shift that much more heartbreaking and horrible. Having said that, still a good performance that services the needs of the role.)

Louis Morgan said...

Golestani, Rostami, Maleki - (Each kind of play a different role though all playing the same role in the sense of each achieving some kind of independence and self-realization though all in different ways. Golestani being the most direct arc as she brings just the quiet dutiful wife who isn't stupid rather we see her present it as someone who just wants to go along to get along and brings this sense of blindness when she commands her daughters to do the same. Golestani brings though even in these moments an undercurrent of someone forcing themselves into these positions for the ease of living. Her breaks when she first just shows humane support for her daughter's friend is just as innate decency and genuine concern as the true nature. Rostami and Maleki then present the much more active though reserved concern of the youth, though effectively Rostami has initially a more overt passion in the regard while Maleki's work is more subdued within herself. When the film turns though each essentially is pushed in their development quickly, but believably by the traumatic nature of their situation. Golestani terrific in showing basically the mother's protective instincts for her family as her husband goes out of control, then Rostami and Maleki brilliantly switch with Rostami trying to calm the situation, while Maleki's work becoming the most directly rebellion, each though feel so natural in just the revelations of each of them truly into their true natures.)

Tony:

Fanning - (Not really a great use of her talents as basically the slightly frustrated girlfriend role. She does it as well as she can basically but the role never really pushes her to do anything truly substantial. Part of that is just the film seems like it is missing important moments that skid around what should be the bigger moments of tension. Fanning though certainly conveys exactly what she's going through, and makes the most of her silent reactions of watching Baez and Dylan together, but this just isn't a role that is truly letting her talents shine.)

Barbaro - (Convincing wholly in the performance scenes, but actually takes the confidence she shows in those scenes to effectively present her relationship with Dylan. Where Barbaro is terrific in basically establishing Baez's whole approach to it as undramatically as possible, which works in creating the sense of the character who owns her space, her talent, and her life in a way that she just simply is concerned with a lot of what other people get hung up on. She's effective in basically being a straight man of sorts by presenting just so much without anything getting in the way of just who she is and what she wants.)

Holbrook - (Basically getting to play a more extreme version of Cash as we just see him basically as a Dylan fan who gets a kick of the younger guy's rebellious streak, while being obviously just before or on a bender. Holbrook has just the right amount of fun with it to be entertaining without becoming a cartoon either.)

McNairy - (Actually quite liked his very specific sage, albeit in a state of intense unwellness, manners in his few moments where you see the hints of joy and interest he gets through interactions with Dylan. Would not have minded honestly just a film of him, Seeger and Dylan hanging out together in the hospital.)

Fogler - (Thought he overdid the agent role just a bit, not so much that he's truly distracting but just goes bigger than he needs to in several moments.)

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Where would you rank Wilma for Supporting Actress 1965.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could Joseph Schildkraut and Felix Bressart go up for The Shop Around the Corner? Pirovitch's shit-eating grin when Vadas gets fired is one of my favorite moments in the film.

Matt Mustin said...

Tahmeed: Schildkraut might actually be my second favourite performance in the film after Stewart.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Along with the other 2024 films, could you also check out Firebrand. Curious as to what you'll make of Jude Law's interpretation of Henry VIII.

Omar Franini said...

Louis: I get your reservations on Zareh, although I think his charming presence was toned down on purpose to show the drastic change of his reality and how his character reflects the strict vision of the Regime. Making him more charming or show his lovely nature wouldn’t have worked in my opinion. That’s why the other three leads show more nuances and this sense of realisation towards his figure.

I’m still glad you liked the movie and we can also agree on the final maze section. After I watched the movie in Cannes, I heard that Rasoulof was going to edit the movie again and I wish he had changed a bit that sequence, there’s something off from an editing and pace point of view.

Anyway, last summer I got the chance to interview Rasoulof (https://inreviewonline.com/2024/08/17/an-image-of-beauty-and-destruction-an-interview-with-mohammad-rasoulof/), can I have your thoughts on it when you have time?

Louis Morgan said...

The Fire Inside Cast Ratings:

Destiny - 4.5
Henry - 4.5(He's co-lead)
Adeliyi - 3.5
Aziza - 3.5

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: Where would you rank Lambert Wilson in Ernest & Celestine?

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Yes, I mean Schildkraut based on his ranking position is higher than my original rating anyways.

Luke:

Just below Winters.

Omar:

I understand your point. However I would've preferred to alternatively to show more so the way the regime turned a potentially good man evil, rather than bringing out the evil that was evidently always there of a man. But again this is a choice, and I don't think the other is the "wrong" choice, just one that I feel might've been more compelling for me.

But I thought your interview/article was a great read, and particularly impressed about some of the Q/A's relating to the symbolism choice within the film.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: I asked you this earlier in this comments section, but what roles in non-Bollywood films do you think Shah Rukh Khan would be good for?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of The Fire Inside and Matinee?