Sunday 2 October 2022

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1981: Griffin Dunne in An American Werewolf in London

Griffin Dunne did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jack Goodman in An American Werewolf in London. 

Griffin Dunne plays one of the aspects of the film that makes it as memorable as it is as a horror comedy, a film where both aspects of that are entirely true and neither dominate the other nor do they clash. Rather they cheerfully go hand in hand skipping down the road their merry way, much like our protagonists, two young American men Dunne's Jack and David Naughton's David here who find themselves in the moors in rural England. The first aspect of this is both actors are very much playing their parts as though they were just a film about two guys finding their way through England, any old way. There isn't anything special about them, rather what is special is how very normal they are. Their greatest concern initially is Dunne's portrayal of Jack's rather horny fixation on a woman back home. The change of thought only comes finally when they arrive at a strange village inn where all the ruffians seem to exist in this particular spot in a particular way, as though they never quite escaped a Hammer horror film, while still being allowed to enjoy modern amenities. Dunne's performance contrasts effectively with their surroundings by very much exuding the tourist energy right down to the overly smiling way he asks the locals about their curious candle in front of a rather troubling pentagram. Dunne exudes someone completely out of his element bringing the comedy of this state within the scene right out of a horror movie, though I think this also goes into a key about the film. Which is while both Dunne and Naughton play the part very normally as two random guys in a situation, they do convey the undercurrent of fear and dread as they notice these eerie things. They react realistically on both fronts, one that you might not immediately take it seriously but two you would still probably get a bit of fright from it nonetheless. 

Unfortunately for Jack, he is the last victim of the werewolf that does attack the boys, with David only being narrowly saved by the villagers, though also left infected by the werewolf's curse. Well with that it would seem the end of Dunne's performance, a brief enjoyable bit, but that's it. Well, obviously that's not it as he appears to David at the hospital, featuring his grievous wounds from his mauling, but seemingly very much alive. This is one of the film's masterful ideas of the returning Jack, as not only does it give a very clear representation of what will become David's crimes as a werewolf, but it also allows a very easy provider of exposition as Jack explains how the werewolf curse leaves all its victims as undead forced to wander the earth. What it also does is grant a most unusual character in the form of the decaying Jack and Dunne is wonderful by playing it so much as Jack being very annoyed by his predicament. His delivery of "it's boring" is great because he says it's boring like he's been at the mall for too long or something, not that he's currently in a state of decay. Dunne frankly brings more genuine frustration in Jack when he laments the woman he had been pining for went into the arms of another man at his expense. His actual statement that David needs to die to end the curse is as practical as possible from Dunne as though he's making it just the clear thing that needs to be. All this totally works in Dunne's performance, and again creates a remarkable balance between humor and horror. There is something unnerving but also funny in the zombie talking with such a casual presence.  

Dunne naturally makes an impact with each appearance, Rick Baker's makeup obviously also helps a lot, as his second appearance is as the further rotted corpse. Dunne's subversion of the makeup though is again what makes it truly stand out as he again very calmly lays out what David has to do, and manages to be comedic in this yet still there is a palatable sense of dread. Dunne does this because he doesn't go overboard with the casual, in that he is never truly absurd, rather again it is just this average guy who is a zombie now explaining things, so there is something funny there, but it is also quite serious in its own way. His final scene is a purely verbal performance from Dunne as Jack is now down to his skeletal structure as the corpse, and he is joined by David's victims as they ask for David to kill himself. Dunne nicely shifts his performance just a bit in this scene as his delivery is a bit more optimistic even joyful in his words, as now he's no longer having a heart-to-rotted heart with his friend, he's in a strange way trying to facilitate a conversation between David and the victims. Dunne is very earnest in fact when Jack tries to defend David just a bit and has a real sense of concern in his voice when he notes that hanging would be too dangerous of a method for suicide due to the risk of choking if he bungled it. Dunne's wonderful as his voice exudes a very real sense of friendship with David in the scene and has a slightly positive defensive quality around trying to ease the relationship between David and all his victims. Dunne's performance in each scene succeeds in making a striking impression that is essentially the success of the film in a microcosm. He is funny by being this matter of fact undead creature, but while still inspiring a natural dread. 

78 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Has your opinion of Naughton gone up

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast?

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the makeup effects of the film.

Robert MacFarlane said...

"Oh don't be a putz, David."

Luke Higham said...

Bryan L: What are your thoughts on Walker and Ed Harris's performance.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Have you seen The Inside Outtakes on Netflix yet?

Bryan L. said...

Luke: I felt that Walker as a film wasn't pointed *enough* in its satire for it to fully work, though it does have its moments. Ed Harris is pretty good and I think he actually finds a bit more of the comedic heft of the material than the film does. A strong 4 or a soft 4.5.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

It's consistent, it's a good performance, with a great scene via the phonebooth scene.

Ytrewq:

Like all the bit players, the townspeople, random Londoners, Hospital works etc. are all good.

Agutter - 3.5(Watching it again I think I liked her performance a bit more, though I think all her performances are a bit overly similar to a certain extent, although it works for the part here that is just a very ideal love interest so to speak, however she's good at this here, particularly I do think she makes a more decisive impact with her reactions in the ending which are moving.)

8000's:

All time great work from Rick Baker, to the point that he could not best it, in fact did far from that with likely more money with 2010's The Wolfman. The work here isn't just one thing but a series of great work. The werewolf itself I think achieves the difficult which is a visual that is striking enough to warrant being seen, and that is here by being a proper wolf from hell, and that is far from my favorite bit from the film. Dunne's forms are amazing work, with the first one being amazing because of just how convincing it is as gore, as is every gore effect in the film. Makes most gore effects look as fake as they are in comparison. His full zombie transformations though are equally remarkable in showing the broad transition of decay. Then there is every different form of a transformation we get of David throughout the film, the transformation itself being just outstanding work in making each step both vivid and visceral. That isn't even mentioning the extra bits like the early false transformation in the hospital, or a personal favorite of mine within the scheme of the film, the extra grotesque over the top monster Nazis, that manage to pull off such extreme where you can see the whole thing and it still works.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Yes I have.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on your favorite 'cut' songs from it, and Burnham's work in it?

Louis Morgan said...

I didn't love that episode of House of the Dragon, although I didn't mind most of the developments (including the change of one character's fate), I just didn't love the execution of them, aside from the major confrontation scene which I did think was great. There was just some weird direction in this one (strange given that Sapochnik is usually reliable), particularly the funeral reception I thought was just oddly staged and paced. Not truly bad mind you, just was a little off to me. MVP Considine once again as he continues to be so heartbreaking as the good yet inadequate man though closer second to Macmillan who I thought was great in his scene with D'Arcy. Thought Cooke, Toussaint, Best, D'Arcy all delivered strong work as well, though found the child performances a bit shaky here. Also Ser Criston Cole just might be the worst.

Tahmeed:

I'd say the songs you can see how "they're not *quite* there" they have an idea, but they're kind of overall shaky. So it makes since why he didn't include them though they aren't bad. I mean and you get some good additional moments from Burnham, particularly with the perpetual co

Matt Mustin said...

Finally watched Taxi Driver, thought it was excellent.

De Niro-5
Foster-4.5(Genuinely suprised how little she's in it, by the way)
Shepherd-3.5
Keitel-3.5
Scorsese-4
Brooks-3
Boyle-3

Luke Higham said...

Bryan L: Thoughts on Solaris.

Luke Higham said...

RIP Sacheen Littlefeather

Anonymous said...

RIP Sacheen Littlefeather

RatedRStar said...

RIP Sacheen Littlefeather

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Sacheen Littlefeather

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

RIP Sacheen Littlefeather.

Aidan Pittman said...

R.I.P. Sacheen Littlefeather

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
8000S said...

R.I.P. Sacheen Littlefeather.

Luke Higham said...

At least you liked Hauer well enough. Don't mind it at all as I've been waiting a very long time for Williamson. If I'd started commenting regularly the first time round instead of shortly after I would've been unbearably championing him for a review.

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the Black Panther: Wakanda Forever trailer.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If there's been a rule change, ratings and thoughts on the Nighthawks cast.

Marcus said...

Louis: Thoughts on the 'It's what my Dad would have done' and ending from Top Gun: Maverick?

https://youtu.be/ZAgO-pBQiYY

8000S said...

Louis: So, what are your thoughts on Bill Skarsgaard playing Count Orlok? I'm interested in what he brings to the role, even though a part of me wishes it was Dafoe reprising the role.

Well, hope at least Eggers gives Dafoe the role of Knock.

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the Emancipation trailer.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Less powerful than the last trailer, looks a bit less substantial in some ways due to that, but certainly doesn't look bad, though I'm not sure if they're pulling off Namor's ankle wings that are a weird by design.

Marcus:

Impressive, because I'll be honest, I don't think the original Top Gun entirely earns the earnestness and I'd factor it into the cheesy category (not that I hate it or anything). Here it is the same overall tone, same very intense earnestness, but it absolutely works for me without reservation. I don't know the difference exactly, but maybe because the stakes of the relationship is actually hits a bit harder with the remembrance of Goose rather than the actual death of Goose (which they might as well of said "Goose Who?" in the last scene of the original Top Gun), or perhaps just the strength of the action scenes pulled me in that much more. Either way, or maybe it's both, it works.

8000's:

I just hope it isn't just Pennywisex2, but he certainly has a face that is befitting the role. Additionally Eggers definitely has a way with actors, so here's hoping for something unique and special. Would indeed love to see Dafoe do something in it though.

Luke:

I mean I'm here for the story. I'm here for Ben Foster potentially as a villain. I think other than his accent, which Smith always tends to overdo juts a bit at least, Smith looks solid enough. Fuqua's just not a very good director though and that seems on display with the ugly washed out look of the film. Given it is shot by Robert Richardson, I'm imaging that was probably a Fuqua choice.

Luke Higham said...

I'm all here for Skarsgard. I think partially Eggers wanted to compensate Bill after being forced to drop out from The Northman. He definitely has a physical resemblance to Kinski's incarnation.

Luke Higham said...

And on Lily-Rose Depp, I've yet to see Eggers fail to get goodness out of anyone but at the same time, for a role like this, you need greatness which we would've had with Taylor-Joy.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your top five Anya Taylor-Hoy performances

Anonymous said...

*Joy

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the following scene from Better Call Saul? I really like how the further revelation of Chuck never wanting Jimmy at HHM adds further context to the scene, since you can tell that Howard can't really come up with a good reason for not wanting Jimmy on board.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhdwIPdjDjM

Luke Higham said...

1. The Queen's Gambit
2. Thoroughbreds
3. Emma
4. The Northman
5. The Witch

Luke Higham said...

I don't know what everyone else thinks about this but 2023 is shaping up to be one of if not the most packed year/s in recent memory. Lead Actor could be an All-Timer.

RatedRStar said...

Luke: I mean it's too early to say for Oscars, it looks packed for mainstream films. I think 2022 could be quite unpredictable still, especially in Best Actress, that category has about 8 contenders now, even Best Actor I think has some sort of surprise in it, I really don't feel confident about either Jackman or Nighy.

RatedRStar said...

I mean 2022 has been pretty terrible for video games lol, I hope 2023 is far better in that regard at least.

Luke Higham said...

I still believe that Fraser/Butler/Farrell/Nighy/Jackman will be the five. Bale's out, Smith is far too soon after the slap incident, Pope, Calva and Cacho are at a disadvantage where 4 of the 5 are well-known faces and the other played a beloved icon.

Luke Higham said...

And Apple had no choice but to bite the bullet with Emancipation. KOTFM and Napoleon weren't ready and had no other contender to run with.

Shaggy Rogers said...

My cheering for Song Kang-ho to gain momentum to take Nighy's or Jackman's seats. Neon could bet everything on him alone.

RatedRStar said...

if Jackman and Nighy get in, it will be the first year since 2007 to have more than one Best Actor nominee who is a sole nominee, that is why I don't think its likely that both get in.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Davis and Malden in Dead Ringer.

Calvin Law said...

Shaggy: Neon is being really wishy washy about Broker right now which is a shame, they should 100% take advantage of the potentially open race and go all in on Song.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the use of the Delfonics's music in Jackie Brown?

Shaggy Rogers said...

Calvin: So it is. If Neon used the narrative of correcting Parasite's snub I believe it could work.

Aidan Pittman said...

RatedRStar: To be fair, Living I think can show up in a couple of tech categories, specifically costumes (Sandy Powell) and score (haven't heard it myself but I've seen many people say it's terrific work). With Jackman, maybe The Son will also show up in Adapted Screenplay since it doesn't seem to be a particularly competitive category this year, though given the film's mixed reception so far it wouldn't really be a safe bet.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Smith is definitely not happening, especially since that role appears to be reminiscent of these against type "gimme a nomination now" ones he dabbled in over the years to mixed results.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Davis - 2.5(She just never sinks into either role leaving her performances as vague. You never get a proper sense of villainy or guilt within the character. She's too restrained without being properly subtle. There is occasionally a moment where you see something a bit more notable, but it isn't frequently enough.)

Malden - 4(His performance really is what gives the film any life that it has because Malden intends on giving a realistic performance every step of the way. In turn you get a real sense of the man's love for the woman that he portrays so earnestly and the heartbreaking disbelief at her sudden "demise". His performance though is particularly strong later on the moments of layers where he conveys the man kind of making a truthful accusation while also denying the truth to himself as something that would just be too painful to admit. He gives a real complexity to the role, it's a shame the rest of the film just isn't on his level.)

Bryan:

It's great subtle acting from McKean and Fabian, as you see McKean's false face but in it kind of the slight indicator that he wants Howard to stand firm. Meanwhile Fabian does great internalized frustration as he needs to present himself as the jerk, while in fact he's only doing it because Chuck is telling him to do it.

RatedRStar:

Nighy definitely could go along with screenplay at the very least, Jackman on the other hand is looking like Vanessa Kirby, if he can get in at all.

Tahmeed:

A perfect essentially romantic underscore, and just wonderfully played as this innate connection between Forster and Grier in their scenes together.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I just watched The Hunger for the first time, and I think this may be one of my favorite films of the 80’s.

8000S said...

Louis: Your alternate choices for Davis' parts in Dead Ringer.

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

How about dem costumes.

8000's:

de Havilland, Fontaine or Leigh. I think Davis was cast well enough though, probably needed better direction.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: Seeing how it had its premiere in 2000, but your cast ratings and overall thoughts are based on its uncensored 2002 cut, is Batman Beyond:Return of the Joker a 2000 or a 2002 movie in your book?

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Your Female Leader and Supporting top 20 rankings in 1949 with ratings and 5 other honorable mentions. At the time no one had asked you, so... better late than never.

Luke Higham said...

Shaggy: They're on Howard Vernon's review.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Thanks Luke

8000S said...

Louis: So way before he directed The Night of the Hunter, Laughton was going to direct a stage adaptation of Thomas Wolfe's The Web and the Rock, which would star Robert Mitchum as a writer who seeks the meaning of life, has an affair with an older married woman played by Irene Dunne in New York, goes to Europe and after being dillusioned with Hitler's rise with Europe, returns to his hometown in North Carolina, but comes to realize that he can't recapture the past.

Now, it was supposed to be a stage adaptation and it was never made, but what do you think of the story of the book as a movie adaptation?

Louis Morgan said...

Ytrewq:

2000, as I always defer to the original release date for any new cut, imperfect, but still the most sensible way to go.

8000's:

I mean that summary alone doesn't inspire too much, it would all be in the execution, which again Laughton's someone I would've loved to see tackle other things given what he did with Hunter.

Luke Higham said...

Loved your Barry Lyndon review. :)

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Really liked the parts of the new House of the Dragon that I could actually see, such an odd throwback to GOT season 8 by Sapochnik. MVP for me would probably be Macmillan, although Cooke and D'Arcy were not far behind.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: I thought Solaris a very intriguing sci-fi film from Tarkovsky. Didn’t quite hit the sweet spot for me as Stalker did, but with time it could.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this Japanese voice for Poison Ivy? Much like Catwoman, I think it's a perfect voice for the language.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAUgmBeUr1g

Anonymous said...

Louis: From the plays of his you've read, your Shakespeare ranking and your brief thoughts on your 5 favorites?

8000S said...

*perfect voice for the character

Matt Mustin said...

I thought The Omen was a pretty good horror film. Not among the greats, as some claim, but pretty good. The score helps a LOT.

Peck-4
Remick-3.5(The .5 is for her pitch perfect reaction in the hospital scene with Whitelaw. Speaking of...)
Whitelaw-5
Warner-4
Stephens-3
Troughton-3.5
McKern-3
Palance-4(Makes her big moment extremely chilling and unforgettable)

Perfectionist said...

Luke: Where is the Barry Lyndon review??? On Louis' letterboxd?? I forgot where the link was honestly.

Luke Higham said...

It's on his Letterboxd profile.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Thanks.

8000's:

I would agree, brings the fanatical passion.

8000S said...

Louis: I remember being at a forum about alternate casting choices, and a user said that he would have preferred Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek over Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall as Jack and Wendy in The Shining.

I'm curious, what do you think of those casting choices? Honestly, I think both would have knocked it out of the park, Spacek as Wendy especially.

Matt Mustin said...

Saw Elvis. It's a huge mess, but in the end I found myself liking it, mostly due to Butler and the huge amount of style Luhrmann throws at it.

Butler-5(I don't normally go for biopic performances necessarily, but in this case he is so absolutely bang-on that it's kind of astonishing. There were moments where I genuinely forgot that I was watching an actor he so totally becomes Elvis, especially in any of the performance scenes. He also hits the dramatic moments well, but this is all about him BEING Elvis, and he does that, which is pretty extraordinary)

Hanks-???(I don't know guys, like...his approach is fundamentally flawed and bad and he absolutely comes off as extremely goofy, but I was always fascinated watching him, so I guess Wiseaus, but at the same time, I kinda liked some of his silent reactions, so I don't know what the fuck to think of this one)

Everyone else is pretty much fine but they don't stand out at all, but I liked what Dacre Montgomery and Kelvin Harrison Jr. brought to it.

Matt Mustin said...

Actually, you know what, let's say 1.5 for Hanks, because Butler succeeds completely at being the real-life figure he's meant to be, and Hanks is just this random cartoon character that bounces off him.

8000S said...

Louis: Also, in a 2018 biography regarding Claire Trevor, it says that she turned down roles in movies starring James Cagney.

Would you say it was a missed opportunity that the two never worked together? I mean, she had worked with Bogart and Robinson, so it's kind of surprising that the two never worked in a movie.

Calvin Law said...

Just watched God's Country, just to make the category even harder Thandiwe Newton gives one of the best performances I've seen in the Lead Actress category this year.

Matthew Montada said...

Calvin: Ratings for the cast of God’s Country?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Feeling inspired by Matt's comments on The Soup, I watched Saint John of Las Vegas in search of some hidden gems with Steve Buscemi. I assume it was trying to be some sort of road trippy Leaving Las Vegas-lite, but unfortunately it really comes short in that regard and it doesn't amount to much in every way.


Buscemi-3.5(Mostly a poutporri of scenes with Buscemi being a likeable straight man to everything weird happening around him, which he does well enough. He proves quite compelling during the occasional gambling moments when he becomes more assertive and charismatic, but for some reason the movie pushes that aspect of titular John far away. Such a shame, he could've been a 4 or even more, if he was allowed to explore that part of a guy in greater detail.)

Malco-1.5(During his first scene I could tell he was going to be overall boring as hell and I was not disappointed. The highlight of this performance has to be him furrowing his eyebrows in the car, which he doesn't do again. Sob sob.)

Everyone else-2.5, except for Danny Trejo, beacuse he has like a minute of screen time and script forces him to not do nothing impactful.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

*anything impactful

Anonymous said...

Nicholas Hoult is replacing Harry Styles in Rober Egger's Nosferatu movie. And I have a feeling Don't Worry Darling was part of the reason why.

Anonymous said...

https://twitter.com/MatthewAStewart/status/1577833570873364482 Screen time for The Death of Stalin.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Again I think Kubrick was probably intentional in his choice with Jack, however I don't agree with the intention. And yes Spacek would have been heartbreaking in her portrayal of fear, and Sheen could've created a more convincing believable transformation from troubled yet seemingly normal man, becoming a full blown psychopath.

Certainly in that they were both very talented performers.

Anonymous:

I always knew they had substantially more screen time, it is more so the structure of the film that led me to place them in supporting, as even with that so much of it is them within crowds, and other scenes showing group reactions.