Ben Gazzara did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jack Flowers in Saint Jack.
Now the key to all of this might be the brilliant execution of Gazzara's performance that is in showing, somewhat almost seemingly hypocritically, the decent nature of Jack that continually reveals itself even as he seems to present himself as the cynical ex-patriot. Gazzara's work is pitch perfect in the specific realization of this, take the moment where an associate of his is murdered, Gazzara's reaction isn't big, in fact a cursory look might make one think he doesn't care, but for a man like Jack, who has seen too much, it's heartbreak. Gazzara's expression does reveal this quiet sadness, and really his low key but oh oh so perfect near whisper of "pricks" says it all in a way. His humanity is revealed the most in his relationship with a milquetoast English accountant William (Denholm Elliott), where Gazzara's small reactions to Gazzara reveal a genuine care for the man that slowly grows the more they interact and the more William shows himself to be a bluntly decent human being. What is so great again is that Gazzara is so low key, yet in the low key style does he so naturally reveal the way a guy like Jack reveals his care and affection for another human being. It is then a profound moment when William collapses and Jack goes to his aid. Gazzara's performance is remarkable, and quietly powerful, because in the moment he releases all cynicism and is tremendous in showing Jack truly care for a moment. It is still a muted reaction, yet for a guy like Jack it is though he is yelling in anguish. And that is the brilliance of this work is where Gazzara teaches us a lot about this guy, while always being honest to the character. He finds the right detailed nuance in the minor of changes in his work, while creating such a vivid sense of the history of the man that defines his more static state. It is terrific work that really makes the film worth watching. Although the story Jack exists in isn't incredible, just being with Jack is something special, and Gazzara is the essential ingredient in making it so.
Ben Gazzara's performance is what makes this film really, which on its own merits isn't bad, but somewhat scattershot in its storytelling. Gazzara is what holds it together and really elevates to the point of interest. This is a performance where there is just so much life inherent within his performance. Gazzara coming onto the screen you just immediately get a sense of his Jack Flowers. His face wears a world-weariness of a man who is exiled in a way to his spot in the world, and while we don't exactly learn what the man's been through, there is a strong sense of it just in Gazzara's manner. He just exudes this time of alienation, but also with that a particular sense of a kind of strange sort of understanding with this state at the same time. It is an essential trick that Gazzara pulls off as his performance develops an immediate history with Jack Flowers from the moment you see him. You sense this guy who has been making his way in this peculiar state for a long time and the ease about it. Different from comfort though as Gazzara never shows Jack as a happy man exactly or someone truly content, but there is the sense in every frame that this is a man who clearly knows his life and has been living it his way for a long time. The idiosyncrasy then of the man and in turn Gazzara's performance is what makes him such a fascinating figure to follow throughout his film, and importantly engages you into this world through the unique nature of the perspective offered by Jack.
Everything that Gazzara does here in terms of his performance is kind of a fascinating sort of lie while doing so always suggests a truth. And if that doesn't exactly make sense, well it really shouldn't but it completely does when viewing Gazzara's performance. One is that in a certain sense Jack, as this tired aging pimp could be or maybe even should be a boring man as he seems somewhat done with life. What makes Gazzara so good is he wholly embodies that state of distaste for life, while wholly being this man so filled with life all the same. A key truth to this performance, and perhaps why you don't become tired from watching Jack, despite Jack being a tired man in a lot of ways, is that Gazzara's whole performance in a way is playing from a deep core of the man that in a way is the opposite from the most immediate surface of him. This is as we see him going around being the pimp, he is the man whose face says "I don't give a damn about anyone or anything". Yet in the moments where Jack is interacting with some of the women or some of his clients, there is a charm in his little smile that appears in his greetings. It isn't false, rather there seems to be a man beaming with a long-forgotten life, and a man that once was Jack who probably loved life, at least as much as he could. There is that hint though that makes Jack, despite his better or worse nature, likable in his strange way that is essential in crafting the investment in Jack and in turn investment in his little world of his.
A part of the strangely endearing quality in Gazzara's performance is very much in the personal style that is so distinct within the character, a man of specific words, with often an incisive comment or story to be mentioned from him that just speaks to years of experience, whether misspent or not. Gazzara just breaths a natural life about every moment that makes Jack so tangible in the best of ways. It's a performance that is captivating in such a unique way because there's nothing about Gazzara's performance that is traditional kind of aggressive energy or charisma. Don't get me wrong there is charisma and there is energy, but Gazzara makes it all this exact rather style for the man that is Jack, that just feels right for the man that is Jack. What makes this an intriguing character study more than anything is Gazzara because he just so much IS Jack in a way that makes it easy to be fascinated by this one of a kind character as he goes around his seedy world, yet does it in a way that makes at least his space strangely friendly. Gazzara's nuance is what is so substantial here, as that setting of the slight exasperated grump, isn't who Jack is, even if that what his face suggests. This in every word Gazzara brings that sense of living, sense of wisdom and personal sense of style. Gazzara pulls off the trick as it is in those slight changes that in one moment he can be just one of the guys hanging out, and the next can stare down a gang of violent men with the same sense of that peculiar kind of "Cool" of sorts.
Now the key to all of this might be the brilliant execution of Gazzara's performance that is in showing, somewhat almost seemingly hypocritically, the decent nature of Jack that continually reveals itself even as he seems to present himself as the cynical ex-patriot. Gazzara's work is pitch perfect in the specific realization of this, take the moment where an associate of his is murdered, Gazzara's reaction isn't big, in fact a cursory look might make one think he doesn't care, but for a man like Jack, who has seen too much, it's heartbreak. Gazzara's expression does reveal this quiet sadness, and really his low key but oh oh so perfect near whisper of "pricks" says it all in a way. His humanity is revealed the most in his relationship with a milquetoast English accountant William (Denholm Elliott), where Gazzara's small reactions to Gazzara reveal a genuine care for the man that slowly grows the more they interact and the more William shows himself to be a bluntly decent human being. What is so great again is that Gazzara is so low key, yet in the low key style does he so naturally reveal the way a guy like Jack reveals his care and affection for another human being. It is then a profound moment when William collapses and Jack goes to his aid. Gazzara's performance is remarkable, and quietly powerful, because in the moment he releases all cynicism and is tremendous in showing Jack truly care for a moment. It is still a muted reaction, yet for a guy like Jack it is though he is yelling in anguish. And that is the brilliance of this work is where Gazzara teaches us a lot about this guy, while always being honest to the character. He finds the right detailed nuance in the minor of changes in his work, while creating such a vivid sense of the history of the man that defines his more static state. It is terrific work that really makes the film worth watching. Although the story Jack exists in isn't incredible, just being with Jack is something special, and Gazzara is the essential ingredient in making it so.
58 comments:
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.
Great review as always. I watched this film last year and was really pleasantly surprised by the quality of such an overlooked movie. Gazzara was superb in the role; also a fascinating and rare cinematic look at Singapore in the 70s. It’s on YT and definitely worth a look.
1) Kaidanovsky
2) McDowell
3) Martin
4) Mason
5) Langella
1) Ogata
2) Scott
3) Gazzara
4) Dewaere
5) Kinski
Michael McCarthy: Your ratings for McDowell, Steenburgen and Warner in Time After Time.
Louis: Have you watched any other TV shows lately?
Louis: Your thoughts on this interview with Garrett Brown.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7noCoEDnow0
Luke: Strong 4.5 for McDowell, 4.5 for Steenburgen, 4/4.5 for Warner
Really dug this season's first half of Stranger Things, despite it being perhaps a tad overstuffed, but overall really fantastic stuff despite my earlier reservations. My cast ranking for S4 V1:
1. Sadie Sink
2. Robert Englund
3. Maya Hawke
4. Jamie Campbell Bower
5. Tom Wlashchiha
6. Millie Bobby Brown
7. Caleb McLaughlin
8. Joe Keery
9. Natalia Dyer
10. David Harbour
11. Joseph Quinn
12. Grace Van Dien
13. Gaten Matarazzo
14. Kevin L. Johnson
15. Joel Stoffer
16. Brett Gelman
17. Matthew Modine
18. Paul Reiser
19. Finn Wolfhard
20. Mason Dye
21. Sherman Augustus
22. Eduardo Franco
23. Nikola Duricko
24. Noah Schnapp
25. Priah Ferguson
26. Winona Ryder
27. Charlie Heaton
28. Logan Riley Bruner
I actually thought this was the best Heaton's been in a while... which isn't saying much when I think about it.
Louis: With the Venice list, has your opinion of Alba Rohrwacher's work in Hungry Hearts gone up since doing 2015. If so, where would you rank her now in the Lead Actress ranking.
I’d go lower on Brown this year. I’ve heard some criticisms about her choices over the years, but this was the first time I found myself kind of agreeing with them.
(Also, my hot take for the season is that Evil Archie Who Sounds Like Young Tome Cruise If You Look Away From the Screen is actually interesting. I enjoy the Duffers throwing stones in their glass house to make fun of Riverdale)
Robert: I didn't need those Riverdale knockoffs to get THAT much screen time, but I'd be lying if I didn't say Not KJ Apa performed those scenes well.
Louis: Your top ten William Zabka acting moments?
Tahmeed: Calling it now, Rob Morgan is gonna shoot him like Toby Jones did to Marcia Gay Harden in The Mist. Tome for the Duffers to reference newer King material.
Louis:your 10 best Aaron Eckhart moments?
Louis: Would you say Plummer is close to your top actors list? Your opinion of him seems to have gone up a lot since his first review.
I recently watched The English Patient for the first time. Holy mother of god, was that boring. The only times something slightly interesting happened were in the much less focused second half, and even that not exactly thrilling stuff. The only characters i actually really gave a damn about were Willem Dafoe (who i am honestly not sure needed to be in this story in the first place) and Naveen Andrews (and that's 100% just because i like Lost).
And all those wins in the technical categories, jesus! I mean, it's adequate, it works, but not really exactly impressively done. This really is Harvey Weinstein's campaign masterpiece - I don't give a fuck, i will defend Shakespeare in Love till the day i die.
Fiennes - 4
Binoche - 4
Dafoe - 3
Thomas - 3.5
Andrews - 3
Firth - 2
Prochnow - 3.5
I needed to watch something better to wake me up, so i saw District 9 for the first time in what? 7 or 8 years. Still really effective, albeit it a bit inconsequential style-wise. I mean, is it a mockumentary or just a handheld-shot movie? that even confused me at 12 or 13 years old, ngl.
Copley - 5
the rest - 3
I’m still choosing to die on the hill of “The English Patient was wonderful and it’s one of Ralph Fiennes’s top 3 performances.”
Michael: Okay, Peterman.
It's funny... Fiennes is still the only 1996 best actor nominee that I haven't watched. I wonder how I'll respond to his performance if I ever see "The English Patient", but for now, Cruise still takes the line up by a good margin.
Also, whats everyone's thoughts on this scene from "The Boys"? It's Esposito's signature moment of the series, in that it appropriately uses his screen presence and made me wish he had a bigger role in the show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEyrJ-sCGVo
I'm still kinda annoyed that Macy wasn't put in Lead Actor category and if that were to happen, his chances of coming out victorious would've been much higher-he makes Rush's winning performance look like high school play.
Louis: Your thoughts for the cast of Top Gun: Maverick?
If you go back to 1990, I recommend After Dark, My Sweet. Excellent performance from Jason Patric (was he hot at the time?) and a good one from Bruce Dern in support.
On another note, I finally watched "Grosse Point Blank" tonight and enjoyed it. It's an ideal Cusack vehicle, but also a rather unique concept for a 90s comedy - one that's done with the right kind of lightheartedness.
Ytrewq - I doubt it. Rush had a showy transformative biopic role, and you know how much AMPAS eats those up. William H Macy, as good as he is, probably would've lost in the Best Actor field too.
Pretty much loved The Northman. As usual for Eggers, the technical elements are excellent particularly the amazing cinematography and incredible sound design. As with his other two films, I love the way Eggers writes his dialogue with language that truly does feel of the particular time and place of the film, and his ability to transport you to the world he's fashioned is pretty extraodinary.
Skarsgard-5
Kidman-4.5(Was kinda baffled by the praise she was getting for most of the film, but then that monologue is AMAZING.)
Taylor-Joy-4
Bang-3.5
Hawke-4
Bjork-4
Dafoe-4(Not a whole lot more than a cameo, but this is some prime Dafoe craziness.)
FINALLY got around to Everything Everywhere All At Once. If a film reminds me of It's a Wonderful Life, I'm basically guaranteed to love it. Easily my favorite film of the year.
Yeoh - 5 (one of the greatest performances I've ever seen)
Quan - 5
Hsu - 4.5 (can go up)
Hong - 4
Curtis - 3.5
Slate - 3
Shum Jr. - 3
Louis: When you get back to 2017, you should check out "Mom." A great film that's basically Bollywood's version of Promising Young Woman funneled through I Saw the Devil.
It has a phenomenal swansong leading turn from Sridevi (who's now my Best Actress win for that year), with very fine supporting work from Sajal Aly, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Adarsh Gourav and others.
Tahmeed: I have seen that. ABSOLUTELY phenomenal work by Sridevi. Tragic she passed months later cause that was one fierce performance!!
Luke:
Elliott - 3.5(Brings the right low key affability and modest manner. He doesn't overplay it finding just enough of the needed simplicity of the character's honesty. He shows him just an endearing sort by just being normally considerate in a very straight forward way.)
Bogdanovich - 3(Does pompous sleaze well here if a fairly limited role.)
Everyone else is good albeit in limited parts, it is Gazzara's show through and through.
Houndtang:
Thanks and I'll keep those recommendations in mind.
Marcus:
None beyond what has already been discussed.
8000's:
Well Brown truly has the inventor's perspective as the common viewer wouldn't share his criticism of the Halloween steadicam, or at least not really notice it, but it is great to hear his specifics regarding the invention. Additionally though his work as very specifically the camera operator offers a unique perspective that very much is looking at in terms of the specifics of the execution.
Tahmeed:
Zabka:
1. Last talk with Tommy
2. Reaction to "Sweep the leg"
3. Seeing Daniel again
4. Bad dates
5. First lessons
6. Driving with Daniel
7. About to fight with Daniel
8. Reminiscing with Daniel
9. Trying to help Kreese
10. Discovering the Internet
I'll certainly keep that in mind, as that sounds like quite the combination.
Ytrewq:
Eckhart:
1. Winning over the talk show - Thank You For Smoking
2. Ending - The Dark Knight
3. Negotiating with the Marlboro man - Thank You For Smoking
4. Laughing - In the Company of Men
5. Talking with Gordon post injury - Thank You For Smoking
6. Hollywood pitch meeting - Thank You For Smoking
7. The Truth - In the Company of Men
8. The Hospital - The Dark Knight
9. Cruel scheme suggestion - In the Company of Men
10. Frasier chooses the romcom - Frasier
Marcus:
Well I certainly do like Plummer a lot, and perhaps if I had the pleasure of experiencing his legendary stage work it would be no brainer. He's someone who is one of the pleasures of doing this, because I've gotten to see so much great film work from him, that you do have to get off the beaten path to find for the most part.
Bryan:
Cruise - (Cruise control as I often describe his rock solid leading turns, although I do think it is important to note that he does differentiate Maverick from say Ethan Hunt, even as he's portraying this confident lead, because unlike Ethan who wants to just do the right thing, Maverick definitely has a big ego while doing his job. Cruise finds the right variation with that to separate Maverick from his frequent recent role. Cruise otherwise is just rock solid in delivering the charisma and bringing the right emotional nuance in crafting the different relationships with Teller's Rooster and his scene with Kilmer of course. Beyond that he brings the right tempered ego, it's not as strong as the Maverick of 86, but you still feel it. My only critique is that his chemistry with Connelly isn't amazing, but honestly if you look at Cruise performances in general he's best with his female co-stars if they have a working relationship as the primary with more suggestions of romance within like with Blunt and Ferguson. I think they should've reworked her character into that vein some how and I think that would've been more effective. Although the more I think about the film, my only real reservations is that chemistry.)
Connelly - (Although I think she's overall fine, you can argue that she doesn't breath a life beyond a certain point regardless of chemistry with Cruise, though just in terms of portraying the generalized emotions she's fine.)
Teller - (Good choice in casting as he does exude the right Anthony Edwards vibe though with a bit more of a built in frustration and intensity about him. He has the right presence that evokes the son of that particular father that works especially well here.)
Hamm - (Honestly I think they should've kept Harris as Maverick's thorn, because he did do that idea better in his one scene than Hamm does in all his scenes, though Hamm is perfectly fine.)
Powell - (Wonderfully pompous and overbearing. I like that he did enough to make it his own and not seem as though he was trying to channel Kilmer, doing his own variation on the over confident hot shot.)
Barbara & Pullman - (Both don't have too much but I think each bring what they can within that.)
Kilmer - (Could go up to a four honestly, and what he does here does make me hope some filmmakers will try to find a way to include him, as unlike the Snowman, this film shows it can be done even for a scene. His work though I think is remarkable both in the moments of just his non verbal performance that is as biting as his little texts to Maverick and manages to hold the scene even with his unfortunate limitations. When he does speak though it manages to be very moving both of course out of character, but also carries it as the Ice man character wonderfully well.)
Holy shit that episode of Barry was intense.
Great episode. I think the actors who played the dads might've been my MVPs, though Root and Goldberg were also particularly on point.
Fantastic episode of Barry, that beach sequence was just mesmerizing. I'm split between Goldberg and Jesse Pinkman's dad for MVP.
Louis: Actually, those shots in Halloween were achieved through a Panaglide, not a Steadicam.
Your top 10 Oscar wins in cinematography for both the black and white and color categories?
Louis: Have you started watching the latest season of Stranger Things yet? I'd love to hear your thoughts on Sadie Sink's work when you get around to it, her performance in 'Dear Billy' is probably my favourite single episode performance in the show
Amazing Barry episode, overall MVP is Barry's direction for his entirely haunting work involving Barry in the episode. MVP to Michael Bofshever's heartbreaking work, though Goldberg makes a strong case in showing Sally slowly losing it more and more.
8000's:
Yes I know, as the budget wouldn't have afforded it, I was referring to it, as, which was the way any attempted steadicam effect is typically called steadicam regardless of actual use, a bit like the use of Band-aid regardless of adhesive medical strip.
Color:
1. Blade Runner 2049
2. There Will Be Blood
3. Days of Heaven
4. Lawrence of Arabia
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Apocalypse Now
7. Road to Perdition
8. Black Narcissus
9. Birdman
10. Master and Commander
Black and White:
1. The Third Man
2. Rebecca
3. Tabu
4. Schindler's List
5. Hud
6. Laura
7. The Song of Bernadette
8. Battleground
9. Great Expectations
10. Wuthering Heights
Tahmeed:
Not yet.
Louis: Watching TG: Maverick, I couldn't help but think about how accurate your comment was about Cruise's asexual screen presence (although I don't think it hindered his work, Maverick being an egotist makes that work for me). Who are some other performers you like who lack that quality?
I just saw Top Gun Maverick and loved it. What surprised me the most was having a mix of The Color of Money, First Man and Mission Impossible movies. Maverick joins Mad Max Fury Road and BR 2049 as the best late sequels that surpassed their predecessors.
Tahmeed:
Alec Guinness
Julie Andrews (Despite her husband attempting to reinvent her presence to such multiple times.)
Rewatched Angels with Dirty Faces. Not gonna lie, it's uncanny how the actor who plays young Rocky sounds a little like Cagney himself.
Also, everytime I watch it, I appreciate O'Brien's performance more and more. It's a beautifully underplayed performance that contrasts with Cagney's more energetic and intense turn. In the final scene with the electric chair, Cagney is obviously fantastic, but I also like O'Brien's performance and how he mouths the prayer silently. There's also the close-ups on his face, aside from that memorable Cagney stare before he gets executed. It's great stuff.
"Let's go say a prayer to a boy who couldn't run as fast as I could" is also easily one of the greatest ending movie lines IMO.
Louis: Your top 20 endings of the 40's.
8000's:
An all-timer ending to be sure.
1. It's A Wonderful Life (No thought required)
2. Casablanca
3. Bicycle Thieves
4. White Heat
5. The Devil and Daniel Webster
6. The Maltese Falcon
7. The Great Dictator
8. Notorious
9. The Ox-Bow Incident
10. Late Spring
11. Double Indemnity
12. Beauty and the Beast
13. Odd Man Out
14. Pinocchio
15. Rebecca
16. Laura
17. Brighton Rock
18. The Heiress
19. The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad
20. The Third Man
Louis: What's the order you would use for watching Kurosawa's 5-10 best films for a marathon?
Anonymous:
1. Yojimbo
2. Ikiru
3. High and Low
4. Kagemusha
5. Rashomon
6. Ran
7. Sanjuro
8. Throne of Blood
9. Stray Dog
10. Seven Samurai
I think it is best to mix around his time periods (Both in terms of setting and when he made them), and carefully administer tone. Also placed a "Breather" of sorts after each of his most devastating films, either in terms of tone or pacing. Yojimbo is the essential opener (always the film I recommend as the starter Kurosawa) and I think Seven Samurai is the proper sendoff (as his most well known film, but also as his epic that contains a lot of entertainment along with both tragedy and hope.)
Louis: your top 10 acting moments for Renee Zellweger and Ellen Burstyn.
Louis: Apparently, this year at the Emmys, producers can decide whether their shows are comedies or dramas, instead of making a run time distinction.
With that in line, which category do you think would make more sense for Barry this season? (although they're definitely submitting it as a comedy of course).
Marcus: From a winning standpoint, there's no reason to switch to Drama. Also, I think HBO would rather have Barry compete against Ted Lasso instead of Succession.
Louis: your thoughts on the screenplay of Clue, and there are any board games do you think could have good movie adaptations?
Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplay of Les Diaboliques.
Louis: Also thoughts on these excerpts of Clouzot's L'Enfer, a film he never got to finish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_9OePeXfSE
Louis: Thoughts on the Black Adam trailer.
Louis: Thoughts on Obi-Wan Episode 4.
Louis: This might have been asked before, but what review of yours are you the proudest of?
Marcus:
The funny thing is I think drama front-runner Succession probably had more laughs total than Barry this season, despite Barry still being hilarious this season, but it goes to show such distinctions are too limited since both shows are very dramatic and very funny. Anyways, still comedy due to the baseline that is absurdist despite how intense it gets.
Lucas:
To fully discern the script, as it has been said there has been improvisation, I would need to read the original, which I have not been able to do so. Even having said that, the overall virtue of the script is having successfully made a board game work. This is crafting a believable narrative in crafting the blackmail story line granting motivation for murder and further murders in the "witnesses". Additionally there are nice thematic touches by devising it within Cold War hysteria that grants an innate atmosphere, even if in a certain sense it is decoration, however fantastic decoration it is. Of course as well done as that is, it really is just set up to allow the performers to play off each other, with tremendous wit and some particularly excellent comedic scenarios. Not every bit works, dog smell for example, but the majority do in a very high ratio that most comedies fail come close to. A reason for that is the characters are well drawn in their respective comedic places where the wonder is the placed different energies, both via performance and the setups for every character. And even the three endings are notable, well the first and third, Peacock ending feels like a filler, as fulfilling the mystery, even as the film is just designed, and effectively so, for comedic situations which it excels with.
8000's:
Les Diaboliques is a brilliant adaptation because it so wonderfully switches up the situation in crafting the situation of the two women instead getting revenge, though with the appropriate twists and turns as such that are executed with pitch perfect pacing and approach. He crafts unique relationships within the characters and creating the idea of both the sense of suspense and sense of guilt in crafting the two women's as individuals in that particular situation. Where the film truly excels though in terms of scripting is in creating the public school atmosphere, where Clouzot gives such a palatable sense of the place and dynamics of that setting. There's more nuance there through that, and the sense of place ever seems present as the plot unveils themselves. The school setting is never forgotten and again makes unique changes within the plot, particularly of the boy who keeps "seeing things". Just impeccably crafted as thriller, but also in there a remarkable sense of place and character.
That is certainly some striking imagery, but I imagine like "Woman in Chains" it might've been just that, as sadly that films suggests that Clouzot might've lost his touch a bit as he got drawn into stylistic excess.
Luke:
Black Adams looks much more expansive than I might've guessed with Hawkman and Dr. Destiny being clearly bigger than mere cameos, unless we're lied to. Sadly though the visual sense of the film suggests a bit of wonky direction, and will keep me from getting hopes that it will be anything notable as a superhero film.
Eh, this show is giving me whiplash. McGregor is the one truly consistent thing abut the series. Here you just get extremely weak storytelling as one character instantly goes from cynicism to being all in, and we get a tragic death that feels like they just deleted scenes or something with how it is dealt with. I also honestly don't mind if a plot falls apart a bit when you think about it too much, but there's aspects here that fall apart before you think about it, which is just really sloppy. Additionally, Moses Ingram continues to unfortunately really struggle with the villain, and just isn't menacing at all. If it weren't for McGregor's committed turn I probably wouldn't even finish it.
Tony:
Far too self-critical of my writing to ever be proud of review, always feel they're never quite perfect. I am however proud of whenever a reader says my review helped them discover a performance, a film, or made them appreciate something more about an actor's work.
Nice Post.
Buy Sulbutiamine from best Pharmacy.
Post a Comment