Denis Lavant did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Adjudant-Chef Galoup in Beau Travail.
Beau Travail is a film with kind of a fascinating rhythmic quality, a musical that's not a musical basically, about a former Foreign Legion officer recalling his time in the service.
The nature of the film therefore leaves Lavant really in almost two separate parts more often than not. This as the man reflecting on the past verbally, and the most often silent man of the past. Lavant being silent is never a crutch for him as a performer. He is just so fascinating, in a way that is rather difficult to describe. There is just something about how he moves, how he looks, how he does everything that is so distinctly his own, and fascinating by itself. It is hard to really pinpoint the magic of Lavant precisely, but whatever it is, he has it. This as even as so many early scenes are either him doing physical maneuvers or really just standing pensively, Lavant is still captivating. This even running an obstacle course, or looking over people, Lavant has that way about him, that is so much his own, and so much something that you can't quite put your finger on why you can't look away from what he is doing. The man's presence just is something that creates character all on his own, you know this character is unique, just because Lavant is unique. This being particularly essential given the nature of the film that asks him to mostly be silent when we actually see him against, his voice carrying us through his personal narration of the story.
Lavant's delivery of the narration itself is this calm and similarly, I suppose, idiosyncratic way in speaking these words. It isn't zestful nor is it dour in the recounting, it isn't overly emotional, but there is rather something entirely appropriate of it at every point, whether he is recounting a death or a state of being. Lavant speaks just as it is, and that appears to be all that is needed. This is, Louis Bingo time, very much a director's film. I will say though Lavant is an actor particularly well built for such affairs because he really doesn't need much to be able to be captivating and even convey character. This as even as scene of staring off with another men later on, does speak so many more words than dialogue would've driven in just from the method of the stare down. Lavant suggesting that Galoup is going through more than just a moment of aggression or toughness. This rather a sense of the man's attraction to the other in the moment, and again this is all unsaid yet beautifully performed. The conflict here is said a little bit, this as Galoup enacts wrath against the soldier he is quietly obsessed with, a la Claggart to poor Billy Budd, and this dynamic is between most of the lines. Lavant delivers the moments that are found, even if more cursory due to the nature of the film that is not focused upon acting as much. Still even with that, Lavant is essential to the film's success by still realizing the drama within the limits allowed by the approach. Also just through a magnificent dance number at the end, that is magical in just the way it is so wholly that Lavant energy of a brute and Baryshnikov.
127 comments:
Aw shit! :(
ughh, crap ...
that dance in the end was fucking great though
Sean: You can't change your prediction after the first review in a line up of five performances.
Sean: Hate to be that guy but you should've stuck to your guns when that lineup was posted because no prediction is eligible for a winning request after the first review.
Eh, Cusack could be a 4 or 4.5 based on how Louis takes to High Fidelity (although he's easily the latter for me).
Sean: Anyway, when making my initial prediction, I usually go with whatever I think Louis will like most instead of what I personally think and I've known for quite awhile now that he likes Lavant a great deal as a performer.
Aw, damn it.
Louis: what are your rating and thoughts on Norma Aleandro in Son of the Bride?
Cry Macho is what you'd expect from late Eastwood, awkward moments, though there were things I liked in there, mostly because I liked hanging out with Eastwood on screen. Honestly if he had cut down on the plot a bit more, and got a more of a confident co-star, it could've been something special. As is, I didn't mind watching it.
Eastwood - 4
Yoakam - 2.5
Minett - 1.5
Urrejola - 1
Louis: You really should watch Malignant. It’s too fucking bonkers to pass up. Psifonian can back me up on this.
I would go higher for him, but glad you liked the film regardless.
Sean: I firmly stuck to my guns and ranked Lavant last, but that was because I personally didn't get ANYTHING out of the film and thought Lavant was just fine.
I still think I have a chance of getting the line-up right. I just need to pray for Louis to find Cusack's performance as a life-changing experience, and I'll be ok...ah, who am I kidding? I should've ranked him third.
Louis: Thoughts on the Cry Macho cast.
Louis: Your thoughts on the direction of The Naked City and Call Northside 777.
Just saw The Eyes of Tammy Faye. Not great and definitely falls into some of the same issues that other films like it though, but I enjoyed it enough overall, which is certainly mostly attributed to the central performances.
Chastain - 4.5
Garfield - 4
Jones - 3
Should’ve gone with my gut on this one. I originally had him at 5th.
Louis: could I have your thoughts on Denis' direction here?
A 4 for the dance? Damn.
I finally released my review of Barry Lyndon. I am very proud of it and would appreciate some feedback.
your thoughts on the screenplay of Edward Scissorhands?
Go figure, I kind of loved Cry Macho, though I also kind of agree with Louis, I don't know. Maybe it just felt nice seeing Eastwood making a film like this, felt...refreshing?
Calvin: your ratings for the cast of Cry Macho?
Eastwood: 4.5
Yoakam: 2.5
Minett: 2.5
Urrejola: 1
Traven: 3
Lucas:
I feel I've given those before.
Robert:
I'll have to check it out soon then.
Anonymous:
Eastwood - (I really liked seeing him in this role that even though his character has the expected hardship and toughness, he's a lot warmer here as the base set then has been his late characters. Here it isn't really that much of a facade of coldness even, the guy is blunt in Eastwood's depiction, but also shows a real empathetic streak about the guy even as he wanders through this particular story. Even in the bigger confrontation scenes Eastwood plays them in a pretty low key, and like "come on" type of way that was an interesting variation from him here. More than anything he excels with the moments of wisdom regarding his character here, which is largely defined by understanding mistakes more than anything, and there Eastwood is wonderful in bringing so much heart to these moments.)
Yoakam - (I think here you get the one take Eastwood problem, as Yoakam is usually pretty good, so I think a couple extra takes would've gotten just a little bit less rushed feeling of a performance from him here.)
Minett - (I think I know what Calvin was referring to here, as he's definitely bad, as what he is doing is against the known tenets of good acting, but he's so earnestly bad so to speak, it is hard to hate this performance. The kid is definitely trying to give a good performance, and while wholly failing, there is something endearing in the attempt.)
Urrejola - (The nadir of the film, both in terms of plot and performance, as she's just an over the top femme fatale that seems like she is out of a completely different movie than the one Eastwood is mostly making.)
Anonymous:
Well in this instance, despite being Dassin and Hathaway, I can really discuss both at the same time, along with really Kazan's work on Boomerang. This as all three films I think were seeking to establish that of the docudrama style, that was unique and interesting that all three seemed to be attempting a similar thing at the same time. This with the simplicity of the narrative in terms of presenting a point, the straightforwardness of the hero, and really the blunt way of shooting. Dassin probably plays with it the most in the climax that is a bit more stylistic with the height of the situation and the purposeful intensity of it. Beyond that though all three emphasize a factual type of procedure and effectively so in that sense. All keep it tight and right in a certain sense, as all three films do work to that extent. In a way showing the limits of that form, but also the success that can be found in it.
Calvin:
Denis's direction really is the film very much so, and I would say it delivered me about 85% of the way, in that I liked the film but didn't quite love it. I did admire the form and the attempt, that again I do think was mostly successful. This as again Denis directs the whole thing as a musical without musical numbers, from the emphasize of the sounds of the training, but also just depicting the training itself with a choreographed bent to it. Every interactions between characters is of a piece of movement that in a way forgoes naturalism for the sake of this style, without overdoing though in the sense of becoming absurd. It is a fascinating kind of realization and creates really the emotion within visual and movement rather than through the spoken word. No moment better realizes that then that ending that is strictly a dance scene, but says much more than that in that dance.
Tim:
The screenplay honestly is pretty lame in some respects. This as it is very simplistic with characters that are pretty simply developed, and the scenario is basically Frankenstein mixed in with a little bit of Beauty and the Beast. Within the text itself this is very basic, and even kind of bad when you get into the bully involved climax that is aggressively obvious. I would say it would be easy to imagine a film version that would be an utter failure with this same screenplay. What makes it work is Burton's direction, this which allows for a fairy tale simplicity, that the screenplay gives, and the urban satire is wholly in Burton's work. The screenplay itself really is just a gimmick, that structurally is prodding and episodic. What makes the film is how it is directed.
Louis: Your thoughts on Juno Temple as an actress?
Louis: Any television viewings these past few months and did you get around to Blackadder Goes Forth.
Louis: I have wanted to show you this for a while, what are your thoughts on this montage for the animated short Oscar winners? for me personally there are a lot of cartoons that I saw when I was young, it does make me smile that the likes of Tom and Jerry are Academy Award Winners.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzaKPHV36oo
Finished watching Cry Macho. Could’ve been better from a script and acting department, but i found this be an overall nice, decent, breezy, enjoyable road trip movie.
Cast Ratings:
Clint Eastwood - 3.5
Dwight Yoakam - 2.5
Eduardo Minett - 1.5
Natalia Traven - 3
Fernanda Urrejola - 1
Horacio Garcia Rojas - 2
Watched Malignant upon Robert's recommendation, and did enjoy its bonkers energy as James Wan's mixtures of Argento, DePalma's Sisters and Kershner's Eyes of Laura Mars. The influences helped me not be too surprised by the plot, however I just really enjoyed the style of it to the point of just going in for the sheer ride of it. This as I was still having fun even when it got really stupid, and corny at the end, and even with the fact that most of the acting would have been just as good if they were Italian actors poorly over dubbed into English in order to get that true Argento feeling.
RatedRStar:
Always love these types of montages, and fun to see an off-beat one. I have to say though, made me realize that the academy loved cats (or hated them I guess?), given the amount of wins for Tom and Jerry, and the fact that Sylvester was usually featured in the Looney Tunes wins.
Tahmeed:
Feels like I haven't seen her in awhile, though she has been in films just not ones that I watched. She's someone I feel we've seen very much within a type of role, that being the vulnerable if not broken woman, with kind of always a younger sister quality to her whether or not that was the part she was playing. Within that type she has managed to show some decent emotional range, and even range within the characters of that ilk from the very childish, if demented, role in Killer Joe, the purer nature in Far From the Madding Crowd, or finding the only tolerable part of Wonder Wheel. Definitely similar in each, however her success there suggests to me a potential for more.
Luke:
Nothing as of yet, other than Season 3 of What We Do in the Shadows, which I've actually been a little disappointed by so far.
Louis: ratings for the cast of Malignant?
"Sydney, I'm adotpeted"
*surprised Pikachu face*
*Pixies cue intensifies*
Me: "Yes, YES. More, MORE."
Also, I agree that the acting is wobbly at best, but I loved Ray Chase's voice work. Gabriel doesn't work if the voice isn't terrifying. Glad they hired him and not a bored celebrity voice actor.
Louis: Temple's terrific in Ted Lasso, I always love it when character actors and actresses get great roles and deliver in them.
Any particular hopes for the Emmys tomorrow? Personally I'm hoping for my NGNG dream of Michaela Coel taking Actress and Screenplay coming true.
I actually haven't seen any TV from this year really, other than WandaVision, so I don't really care too much.
Also, on the subject of this post, if you're looking for another Denis from a year we've gone past, White Material (which is listed as 2009 on most sites but it only got a wide release in France in 2010) is worth checking out for Huppert's performance.
Belfast won the People's Choice Award at Tiff.
Nice to see my capital city win an award. :)
In all seriousness, I'm happy that Branagh's made a strong film again.
Louis: How would you rank Paul Schrader's screenplays and also your thoughts on the screenplay for Affliction?
If there indeed is going to be a 10 lineup for Supporting, I’d like to vouch for Sam Shepard in Hamlet in taking up one of the slots. Makes quite an impression as The Ghost.
If there isn’t, then I’d just be cool with him being included in the Maclachlan review.
Luke, what changes do you expect in Louis's Top Ten for 2000 after the round is over
Sean: He's making no exceptions. He's definitely being reviewed for 2017 best actor. I'm looking forward to his review a great deal but we need to be patient with Louis.
And having researched that year, the Lead Actor lineup would suffer greatly without him.
Anonymous: Yi Yi and Amores Perros will make the top ten, maybe Dancer In The Dark and A Room For Romeo Brass as well.
Joint Security Area is TOTALLY making the top ten.
Michael: My apologies for the oversight.
Sean: kind of an odd wish, why couldn't it wait?
Sean: You Were Never Really Here wasn't released in the States by the time he covered that year and from what I recall, he wasn't able to see an online copy of it either.
And believe me, if he was able to see it beforehand, he would've been in that lineup no questions asked.
Louis: your thoughts on the cinematography to Cry Macho and Censor? They’re two of the best shot films this year so far in my opinion, and I was particularly surprised by the former as I generally am not impressed at all by Ben Davis’ work, even in films I like.
Louis: Your thoughts on the scene from The Strawberry Blonde where Biff and Amy reunite after Biff is released from prison? Honestly, that's got to be some of the best acting from both Cagney and De Havilland's careers.
Matthew:
Uh, other than Ray Chase, whose voice acting is very important and is quite striking, the acting is at all different levels of cheese, and with no one really pulling a Jeffrey Combs or a Fred Gwynne in elevating this kind of thing, while also still playing right into the style. The best acting in the film is honestly the younger girls featured briefly via VHS flashbacks. I will say I think the lead role could've actually resulted in a decent performance, but Annabelle Wallis just isn't that good, as usual. Not sure on the ratings, other than Chase, I'd give a 3.5 to. No one else is getting above a 3, if I'm being generous.
Anonymous:
Major get for Belfast, and guess I didn't jump the gun as predicting as an Academy comeback for Branagh. Side Note it gives Branagh the chance to potentially continue his ability to be nominated in different categories each time, as all 5 of his nominations have been for different things. He could continue it here if he gets in Original Screenplay, but misses director, though definitely seems like he's in play for a nomination for the latter.
Razor:
Well I will say in the year where they nominated rapping Warren Beatty, Schrader was robbed. Affliction I actually think is one of Schrader's best written work, other than one flaw, not even major, which is the sister character is just an over the top stereotype that seems out of place with the rest of the screenplay that is interested in exploring the depths of the people he's examining. Almost every Schrader script starts with the man on an edge, and this one is no different. Although in this instance it is three men actually, one being the son, the father, and actually in our narrator the brother, who has internalized the trauma, yet it is still present in his relationship with his brother. I love that even granting a bit more depth to Spacek's technical side love interest character, which is fairly substantial for a female Schrader role. The central dynamic though is the alcoholic father, who is depicted here so powerfully through the scars of flashback, and in his current state that is equal parts pathetic yet still domineering. In this we explore "our hero" who is spiral all kinds of ways that are most powerfully depicted in this script, particularly as in this instance Schrader uses film tropes to create the same delusion in us. This as we at first believe that conspiracy of murder that he does that brings him towards the path of destruction as this misbegotten belief that it is a path of righteousness. It's actually a script, and film, that the more time I spend with it, the more I like it.
1. Blue Collar
2. Raging Bull
3. The Last Temptation of Christ
4. Affliction
5. Taxi Driver
6. The Mosquito Coast
7. The Yakuza
8. Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters
9. Bringing Out the Dead
10. Light Sleeper
11. First Reformed
12. American Gigolo
13. Obsession
14. The Card Counter
Sean:
Phoenix was purely left out that year because I wasn't able to watch the film, as in literally had no options to before getting to the alternates.
Calvin:
Davis's work in Cry Macho, is the film where it works best is just embracing a quiet and simple beauty of its setting. This in the more unfussy it is in focusing on are character calmly in the southern western landscape, the more effective it all is. Modern Eastwood really doesn't seem to like a lot of lighting, and we get that most effectively here in capturing the natural light in just a simple warm beauty of nature.
The cinematography of Censor is pretty amazing, particularly its subtle use of aspect ratio that slowly closes in on our character. This also though with the lighting that gets more stylish and dynamic as the film proceeds. Both becoming faker in a way, and more dynamic in creating a kind of alternate reality. This as the colors become more vibrant but also more unsettling. The framing and composition more closed within out character. Fantastic work altogether, even if I will continue to feel the film left way too much potential on the table. I'm come to the conclusion that a lot of modern Indie horror is like a heist movie where everything goes perfectly. This as you find out early on what the bad thing is, and then it just slowly happens according to plan but I digress.
I know the Emmys are dumb, but since they’re on tonight here are my personal rankings:
Comedy Series:
1. Ted Lasso
2. The Flight Attendant
3. Hacks
4. Cobra Kai
5. PEN15
6. The Kominsky Method
7. Black-ish
8. Emily in Paris
Drama Series:
1. The Boys
2. The Handmaid’s Tale
3. Lovecraft Country
4. The Crown
5. This Is Us
6. Pose
7. Bridgerton
8. The Mandalorian
Comedy Lead Actor:
1. William H. Macy
2. Jason Sudeikis
3. Michael Douglas
4. Anthony Anderson
5. Kenan Thompson
Comedy Lead Actress:
1. Kaley Cuoco
2. Jean Smart
3. Tracee Ellis Ross
4. Allison Janney
5. Aidy Bryant
Drama Lead Actor:
1. Matthew Rhys
2. Jonathan Majors
3. Sterling K. Brown
4. Billy Porter
5. Regé-Jean Page
6. Josh O’Connor
Drama Lead Actress:
1. Elisabeth Moss
2. Uzo Aduba
3. Emma Corrin
4. Mj Rodriguez
5. Jurnee Smollett
6. Olivia Colman
Comedy Supporting Actor:
1. Brett Goldstein
2. Nick Mohammed
3. Paul Reiser
4. Jeremy Swift
5. Bowen Yang
6. Carl Clemons-Hopkins
7. Brendan Hunt (can’t get over the fact that the “Jesus Loves Marijuana” guy from Community is an Emmy nominee now)
8. Kenan Thompson
Comedy Supporting Actress:
1. Hannah Einbinder (egregious category fraud)
2. Hannah Waddingham
3. Juno Temple (REALLY close between the top 3)
4. Rosie Perez
5. Kate McKinnon
6. Cecile Strong
7. Aidy Bryant
Drama Supporting Actor:
1. Michael K. Williams (This was a no-brainer for me even before he passed)
2. O-T Fagbenle
3. John Lithgow
4. Bradley Whitford
5. Chris Sullivan
6. Tobias Menzies
7. Giancarlo Esposito
8. Max Minghella
Drama Supporting Actress:
1. Helena Bonham Carter
2. Ann Dowd
3. Yvonne Strahovski
4. Madeline Brewer
5. Emerald Fennell
6. Samira Wiley
7. Aunjanue Ellis
8. Gillian Anderson
Fuck yes, Brett Goldstein and Hannah Wadingham are Emmy winners now.
Michael: Wait, THAT was Coach Beard?! This information broke my fucking brain.
Also, I’ll be fine as long as fucking WandaVision wins nothing.
Thank fuck, Nicholson won. Was absolutely terrified of a Hahn win.
Evan Peters winning over the Hamilton actors and Essiedu was rough though.
Thrilled for Julianne though.
Anonymous:
Well...I don't think the Hamilton actors really needed to win to be perfectly honest...and this is from someone who wasn't at all impressed by Evans's performance.
Anderson is the only bad performance I’ve seen on The Crown.
I get that sentiment but I would rather see performances I thought were great to win over one I thought was kind of terrible.
Rewatched Once Upon a Time in the West (in a theatre!) Fonda is definitely supporting, I suspect the reason I questioned that before is just because it's Henry Fonda and it feels like he *should* be lead.
Menzies wins I guess they are going for a Crown sweep.
Should have predicted as much when Foy won for her 2 minute cameo. I’m fine with Corrin and O Connor winning
Anonymous:
Well I'll admit seeing the overabundance of nominations for Hamilton made me re-think including the film into overall awards considerations, not for my own personal rankings, but in general it does feel a bit unfair to all the performances snubbed that were actually intended for the medium in question.
That’s fair. Definitely can see your point
And on that note, since I'm not watching the Emmys, can someone let me know who wins between Joel Edgerton and Ethan Hawke, because it would be hard for voters to choose between to arguable career best turns from two terrific actors.
8000's:
I mean their chemistry is just so lovely, that honestly they're low key one of my favorite romantic couples in film. This as you wouldn't even expect that pairing and it just works so beautifully. That moment in particular just seeing the earnest since of affection between the two that is something quite special.
Ewan McGregor wins an Emmy for a show I'm not even entirely sure exists.
Winslet wins, and as much as I wish it was Taylor-Joy, it's completely deserved.
Louis: Not sure if you knew about it before and were joking, but both Hawke and Edgerton were snubbed.
Louis: could Nick Nolte go up for Affliction?
Am very conflicted about Hamilton beating out Inside lol.
I'll pretend McGregor's win was for Fargo, Peters' was for American Horror Story and Menzies' was for either The Crown S3 or Outlander.
Anonymous: McGregor is like only my third or fourth favourite from that season of Fargo. Maybe fifth. But again, Halston, what he actually won for, doesn't exist.
Delighted with Coel winning for her writing and Winslet is an amazing winner too. Underground Railroad snubbed, but it is what it is.
Inside should've definitely won, I'm probably the least enthusiastic about it overall on here but it very much fits exactly what the category should be rewarding.
Marcus:
What! Impossible...no I was entirely aware, just was hoping reality would rearrange itself for me. Haven't seen Grant and McGregor (though I would be amazed if they were better to Hawke or Edgerton), wouldn't take a second thought for me to replace Bettany with either one, and I liked his performance a lot. However again, seeing Odom and especially Miranda nominated over those two genuinely great, and genuinely televisual performances, helped my change of heart in that regard, as it just was overkill. Yeah Hamilton is great, but the Tony's had it covered, the Emmy love just went over board with it.
Lucas:
Yes.
Tahmeed:
Eh, I'd be more upset about him losing best song to "Agatha All Along", but hey Burnham got half his wins, so it's hard to complain too much on that note
Calvin:
I have to say I'm glad Underground Railroad did not win miniseries, because if it had, it would've felt EXTREMELY disingenuous given all the snubs, because I'll bluntly say I don't think the majority of voters probably even watched it. In fact, I'm not sure many watched it besides you and me to be honest, I'm sad to say, but again Amazon completely bungled the series by setting up for binge watching which is not the way to watch it.
I think I have to watch Ted Lasso.
Louis: I agree, I do fault Amazon as well as the voters, just a poorly conceived campaign altogether, and I agree with you that it would have been disingenuous.
Louis: Thoughts on this? https://youtu.be/NFuBaRiKwD4
Louis: Do you have any intention to watch Amazon's Lord Of The Rings and HBO's House Of The Dragon.
Thomas: I'm definitely checking out Lord Of The Rings. Howard Shore possibly doing the score will have me on board 100%.
Paddy Considine in the lead role is the only thing that attracts me to give House Of The Dragon a chance.
Louis: Thoughts on the trailer for The Worst Person In The World.
I just released a review of Andrei Rublev for those who want to check that out.
Also, here in Norway, the film industry sucks, so Joachim Trier is a blessing for us. Can't wait to see The Worst Person In The World.
Matt:
Marvelous editing, anyways:
Has to be said the JFK Numa/Newman is one of the greatest comedic achievements I think as parodies go. Also always loved the subtle ones like The Godfather II, "MY HOME ELAINE".
Otherwise, I have to say there were a few that I some how never picked up on despite watching both the film and episode many times. That being the Line of Fire, right down to the "I Got something on the stove".
Thomas:
LOTR, maybe since at this point I have no idea what it is exactly. The trailer/reception will be the decider on that one for me.
House of the Dragon, hmmm not particularly, GOT unfortunately just left such a bad taste in the mouth.
Anonymous:
Well I have no idea what is going on, but I do like what I'm seeing.
Louis: Thoughts on the trailer for The Tragedy Of Macbeth.
Looks damn good. Washington finally working with a world class director and this will definitely be up there with Fences. McDormand never disappoints.
Louis: Thoughts on the trailer for Passing.
Luke, what's your 1998 and 2000 Lead Actor top 5 predictions.
Anonymous:
2000:
1. Pearce
2. Lee
3. Hanks
4. Dafoe
5. Bale
1998: (I think either Weaving or Hurt will take the win)
1. Hugo Weaving in The Interview
2. John Hurt in Love And Death On Long Island
3. Christopher Lee in Jinnah
4. Peter Mullan in My Name Is Joe
5. Bob Hoskins in Twenty Four Seven
6. Brendan Gleeson in The General
7. Ian McKellen in Apt Pupil
Sean: Have only seen Hurt from the top 5 prediction.
1. John Hurt (A beautiful performance, one of his very best)
2. Edward Norton
3. Brendan Gleeson
4. Jeff Bridges
5. Ian McKellen
From what I've read, Weaving has the most complex part on paper and that's why I picked him for #1.
Luke: It'd be cool to see Weaving get a 5, the man's underrated.
8000S: This is his best chance of getting one.
Thinking about it more, I'd switch Lee and Mullan around.
I'd advocate Weaving getting a review for Hacksaw Ridge as well, he's the most haunting part of the film for me.
I’ve also been thinking for a while that Weaving in Proof would make for a great backlog review.
I came across this rather heartwarming Geraldine Page clip on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtX0RAM2ZpU
Hopefully 1998 is reviewed soon on the blog.
Anonymous:
Can't tell much from the trailer other the than the aesthetic, which is expectedly impressive
Anonymous:
Premise alone is quite intriguing, and the trailer is very much the same. I'm particularly intrigued by Negga's performance.
Hello Louis and folks!
Well, now that the Venice and Toronto festivals have happened, we can talk about our first predictions of the 2022 Oscar nominees.
PS: I did not mention Frances McDormand because I do not know which category (lead or supporting) Joel Coen and A24 will place her.
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
The Humans
The Lost Daughter
Nightmare Alley
The Power of the Dog
The Tragedy of Macbeth
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Belfast
Don't Look Up!
A Hero
Licorice Pizza
Mass
SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Judi Dench - Belfast
Ann Dowd - Mass
Kirsten Dunst - The Power of the Dog
Jayne Houdyshell - The Humans
Marlee Matlin - CODA
LEAD ACTRESS
Jessica Chastain - The Eyes of Tammy Faye
Penélope Cruz - Parallel Mothers
Lady Gaga - House of Gucci
Jennifer Hudson - Respect
Kristen Stewart - Spencer
SUPPORTING ACTOR
Bradley Cooper - Licorice Pizza
Corey Hawkins - The Tragedy of Macbeth
Jason Isaacs - Mass
Richard Jenkins - The Humans
Kodi Smit-McPhee - The Power of the Dog
LEAD ACTOR
Bradley Cooper - Nightmare Alley
Benedict Cumberbatch - The Power of the Dog
Adam Driver - House of Gucci
Will Smith - King Richard
Denzel Washington - The Tragedy of Macbeth
DIRECTOR
Paul Thomas Anderson - Licorice Pizza
Kenneth Branagh - Belfast
Jane Campion - The Power of the Dog
Joel Coen - The Tragedy of Macbeth
Denis Villenueve - Dune
PICTURE
Belfast
Dune
House of Gucci
The Humans
King Richard
Licorice Pizza
Nightmare Alley
The Power of the Dog
The Tragedy of Macbeth
West Side Story
Is that you? What are your initial predictions?
Comment!
BRAZINTERMA: I don't see Del Toro missing Director. Also the reviews I read about Belfast said Balfe has more chance at a nomination than Dench.
Given it's Macbeth, I wouldn't be surprised if McDormand is actually supporting, but campaigned as Lead.
I really don't think Driver's getting in ahead of Phoenix or DiCaprio. He's taking a backseat to Gaga.
Louis: When Scorsese began casting his version of Cape Fear, he wanted Harrison Ford to play Sam Bowden, but Ford wanted to play Max Cady. Take it with a grain of salt since these rumors might not be true, but supposedly for the Bowden part, James Caan, Warren Beatty, Mel Gibson and Jeff Bridges were in consideration. For Max Cady, Nicolas Cage, Willem Dafoe, Brad Dourif and Jack Nicholson.
Like I said, it's not known if these actors were in consideration, but still, how do you think those actors would have fared in the Cady and Bowden parts? I mean, Ford as Bowden and Dafoe as Cady sound ideal to me.
Luke: Honestly I would put Garfield and Dinklage above Driver as well.
R.I.P. Melvin Van Peebles
RIP Melvin Van Peebles
Louis, your 70s and 90s cast and director for The Dark Knight?
Ytrewq: He gave his 90s cast for The Dark Knight in PSHs’ review for Synecdoche, New York.
Ytrewq: Gene Hackman for Gordon. Either James Woods or Brad Dourif for Joker.
Brazinterma:
Picture
The Power of the Dog
The Tragedy of Macbeth
Nightmare Alley
Dune
Don't Look Up
Belfast
House of Gucci
West Side Story
King Richard
Coda
Director
Jane Campion - The Power of the Dog
Denis Villeneuve - Dune
Joel Coen - The Tragedy of Macbeth
Guillermo del Toro - Nightmare Alley
Adam Mckay - Don't Look Up
Lead Actor
Benedict Cumberbatch - The Power of the Dog
Denzel Washington - The Tragedy of Macbeth
Will Smith - King Richard
Leonardo DiCaprio - Don't Look Up
Peter Dinklage - Cyrano
Lead Actress
Kristen Stewart - Spencer
Jessica Chastain - The Eyes of Tammy Faye
Lady Gaga - House of Gucci
Penelope Cruz - Parallel Mothers
Olivia Colman - The Lost Daughter
Supporting Actor
Kodi Smit-McPhee - The Power of the Dog
Richard Jenkins - The Humans
Corey Hawkins - The Tragedy of Macbeth
Jason Isaacs - Mass
Andrew Garfield The Eyes of Tammy Faye
Supporting Actress
Kirsten Dunst - The Power of the Dog
Ann Dowd - Mass
Caitriona Balfe - Belfast
Aunjanue Ellis - King Richard
Meryl Streep - Don't Look Up
Original Screenplay
Belfast
C'mon C'mon
Don't Look Up!
Licorice Pizza
Being the Ricardos
Adapted Screenplay
The Power of the Dog
The Tragedy of Macbeth
Nightmare Alley
The Lost Daughter
House of Gucci
8000's:
Well I have fundamental problems with Scorsese's direction of the film anyways, however I think more overtly charming actor than Nolte might've slightly softened a major issue in the film, that being there are no remotely likable major characters. Cage, Dourif, and Nicholson all would've been some variation of silly yet maybe entertaining. Dafoe would be the best bet at being entertaining and silly. I actually don't think any of them seemed perfectly defined as the part as Robert Mitchum was.
Ytrewq:
The Dark Knight 1970's directed by William Friedkin:
Bruce Wayne: Sam Neill
The Joker: Tim Curry
Alfred: Laurence Olivier
Gordon: Hal Holbrook
Harvey Dent: Donald Sutherland
Rachel Dawes: Joanna Cassidy
Lucius Fox: Ossie Davis
Maroni: Telly Savalas
Louis: Your top ten favourite male portrayals of psychopaths? (fictional and non-fictional)
Louis: That's what he was apparently going for with his remake of Cape Fear, making the family not very likable, thinking that it would be more realistic.
Luke, If Will Smith gets nominated for King Richard, what rating should be the bare minimum for you to be happy with it since Cumberbatch, Washington, Phoenix and Cooper all look like probable 5s.
Glenn: I expect Smith to be no higher than a 3.5.
Glenn: Having seen much of his career, I'm accepting of the fact that he does have a ceiling but in his case anything less than a strong 4 and career best would be unacceptable as my standard with this one exception is a 4.5 minimum. The quantity of great performances in the past decade has been ridiculous.
I mean, is it THAT unfathomable that Will Smith could give a fiver of a performance? The man's not untalented. He has bad habits and picks projects, but I don't think it's insane to hope he found something with King Richard. Why don't we go into the Oscar season with a slightly open mind?
Robert: I hope you're right.
If Sandler has proven himself with stuff like Punch Drunk-Love and Uncut Gems, then I don't see why Smith can't.
If that one Fresh Prince scene has shown, Smith can be quite the powerful performer when it's called for.
Louis: your modern day Cast and Director for A Streetcar Named Desire?
Your top 10 Ingrid Bergman performances?
Anonymous:
I mean that gets a little complicated in who exactly qualifies, my number one though is Richard Attenborough in 10 Rillington Place regardless however.
8000's:
I know, hence part of his mistaken direction there, as thrillers kind of depend on investment in a certain sense, and really is not the right genre for purely morally onerous. I will say this might've been alleviate with some kind of charm from someone other than Robert Mitchum's cameo, but hey best part of both versions really.
Tim:
A Streetcar Named Desire directed by Paddy Considine:
Stanley: Robert Pattinson
Stella: Niamh Algar
Blanche: Noomi Rapace
Mitch: Harry Melling
Louis: Pattinson is not who I would have thought of for Stanley, but now that you say that, it's perfect. Especially for a modern version.
Post a Comment