Sunday 21 October 2018

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1975: Ugo Tognazzi in My Friends

Ugo Tognazzi did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Count Lello Mascetti in My Friends.

My Friends follows a group of older friends in their strange and occasionally tragic misadventures. 

Ugo Tognazzi plays one of the titular friends, not quite the leader, but perhaps the most charismatic one of the friends. Tognazzi's performance instantly establishes Mascetti as such as he brings a considerable amount of swagger to this performance. Tognazzi's approach does a bit more than that suggesting the man's background before we even learn that he is a count. Tognazzi has a certain style in his manner of a man seemingly of privilege though an exact sort. Tognazzi's manner is that specifically of a European hotshot who carries his nobility less as something dignified, but rather as something to brandish. Tognazzi's demeanor is of a man who very much believes he is a bit of "boss" for the lack of a better word. This seems to play well to the group when they are running their various schemes of somewhat dubious legality. Tognazzi walks on the scene like he is in some way above it all, bringing the appropriate charisma as he helps persuade, and really to con along with friends in their dubious enterprises.

The film though is of the surface and the interiors though as much of it appears to be madcap fun with these friends and their various oddball behaviors. In this Tognazzi is a key ingredient. This is in terms of that aforementioned ability of persuasion, which Tognazzi brandishes through that confident attitude, and often direct yet rapid fire delivery he brings. The chemistry between each party though beyond those roles they fit within their "schemes" is more of how they function as a group than each individual interaction. Tognazzi is terrific though in being part of this sort of specific type of friendly chemistry. This is very much that of boys as much of men in their interactions. These carry always this undercurrent of that camaraderie and warmth that just exudes the history of the men as they interact. This history also comes in the certain sometimes insulting manner between them, though again all the actors handle this well always saying even the most brazen insult to one another with the most sincere of affection within it.

There is that other side of the film though reveals more about the men, and each of their lives which are considerably less joyous when they are all not together. For Mascetti, despite being a count, it is being broke and needing to depend on his friends for charity. Mascetti is unable to support his own family, despite trying to still live the life of the bon vivant. There are moments of desperation that are actually quite moving in Tognazzi's performance when he has to directly either deal with his wife, or ask his friends directly for help. Tognazzi finds this hidden vulnerability within the man that reveals this deep seeded unhappiness that slowly reveals his manner the rest of the time a bit of a facade in a sense. Tognazzi puts on no show in these most personal moments of the man, just portraying a man sadly scraping by with his title being something he clings to rather than lives by. When this is revealed this changes his dynamic with his friends, however not in the way one might expect. Tognazzi's genuine desperation in those scenes creates a certain meaning within his interactions with his friends as a group suggesting these interactions as his only time of comfort. Tognazzi successfully creates this weight than into their often seemingly superfluous interactions by so effectively showing the meaning they hold to Mascetti's whose existence is so troublesome otherwise. Tognazzi naturally coverts this towards the final minutes of the film where one of the friends is on the brink of death. Tognazzi's passionate speech for his friend to be recognized by his wife is a powerful moment. It is not only through that passion Tognazzi brings that reflects their long history, but is all the more potent by that extra shading provided what his friends truly mean for his life. Tognazzi's performance delivers both this needed endearing energy to his character, who could have been insufferable in the wrong hands, and a real depth that attaches more to the friends' hi-jinks than just a bit of fun.

15 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.

Luke Higham said...

And I hope you're doing 1987 next.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the cinematography of A Farewell to Arms, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Anthony Adverse.

Michael McCarthy said...

I'd really like to see this. Louis, do you have any leads on a subtitled version of this? I couldn't even find one on dvd.

Techno said...

Final Ranking:
5 - Tognazzi
4 - Bates
3 - Dern
2 - Williamson
1 - Dreyfuss

Calvin said...

My account is acting up again.

Anyway, I’ve been giving First Man some thought and I think part of the reason I loved it so much and yet was so surprised was how low-key it all was. In fact the only little nitpicks I had were a few of the little stylish touches here and there. In fact the more I think about it the more I really loved how they just honed in on Gosling’s Armstrong. It’s probably going to stay with me more than either of Chazelle’s previous works, particularly in an emotional fashion, even if it’s perhaps the least overtly flashy.

Calvin said...

Also Louis, your top 10 of the year now? For me,

1. Leave No Trace
2. First Man
3. Mission Impossible - Fallout
4. A Star is Born
5. Burning
6. Isle of Dogs
7. Sorry to Bother You
8. Deadpool 2
9. Avengers: Infinity War
10. Shoplifters

Robert MacFarlane said...

1. Thoroughbreds
2. Sorry to Bother You
3. First Man
4. First Reformed
5. You Were Never Really Here
6. A Star is Born
7. Mission: Impossible - Fallout
8. Hereditary
9. Black Panther
10. Tully

Omar Franini said...

Louis: I’m glad you really liked him, the “Supercazzola” scene is so iconic here in Italy.

Calvin: I’m happy to see Leave No Trace and Burning in your top 5, they are in my top 5 too.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Noiret - 4(Noiret is quite good in being sort of the sad sack in the group. He brings the right sort of low key joy in his interactions with the others, but with always this certain overarching ennui. That effectively showing his troubled relationship with his son and wife. There Noiret excels in finding the right pathos in creating this earnest sadness as they refuse to accept his desire to be with his friends.)

Moschin & Del Prete - 3(They're both good however overall make far less of an impression. They are much more just part of the group, even scenes that focus on them, though they are part of that dynamic effectively.)

Blier - 3.5(He's good in creating sort of this outsider's glance and intrigue as he is pulled into the friends' "misadventures". He has the right distance though portraying his interest more as this curiosity, and slight joy that expands the longer he spends time with them.)

Anonymous:

A Farewell to arms features some fine emotionally driven work from Charles Lang this being emphasized in both the lighting, and the framing of shots. It very much emphasizes sort of the romanticism of the contrasts between the two central lovers, with a real proper intimacy in these interactions. It is exceptional work mind you, but certainly impressive for its time.

A Midsummer's Night Dream features particularly unique cinematography for the time from Hal Mohr, and it is not surprising that it managed to pull that into the one Oscar win for someone who wasn't even a nominee. Mohr's lighting is wonderful and properly wondrous in that fairy tale glow he gives to the enchanted forest that kind of steps in for some settings that are pretty basic at times. His work though is properly enchanting, if perhaps just slightly claustrophobic in its framing though certainly never to the point of distraction from the spectacular lighting work.

Anthony Adverse's work is a great deal of "it's fine". There is nothing wrong with per se, but it is pretty standard work for the time. The lighting is just sort of standard period piece for the time no more no less. The framing and composition of shots to the point, but at least not terribly so. There is occasionally a more impressive shot on occasion but these aren't the norm. Again it isn't poorly shot, in fact it is probably above average for the time.

Michael:

Had to go for the last resort, a la An Average Little Man, since even the dvds lacked subtitles.

Calvin:

1. First Man
2. The Old Man and the Gun
3. Bad Times at the El Royale
4. Mission Impossible: Fallout
5. Leave No Trace
6. Isle of Dogs
7. Mandy
8. Avengers: Infinity War
9. Blackkklansman
10. Deadpool 2

Anonymous said...

Louis: your top 20 giancarlo esposito acting moments

Anonymous said...

Louis: your thoughts on tony dalton in better call saul

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:

1. Blood in the pool
2. Salud
3. "I don't think we're alike"
4. Hectoring Hector
5. Threatening Walter
6. Look in the eye
7. Clearing the air
8. Seeing Gale
9. Broken phone call
10. "Do it"

Mitchell Murray said...

Saw "Halloween" today.

It's honestly a very decent slasher film, but it never struck me as anything more than that. Green doesn't try to reinvent the genre, nor does he avoid any of the tropes Carpenter so famously pioneered. It's flawed and straightforward, and doesn't hold a candle to the original, yet all things considered, its much better than it could've been.

Green shows a clear respect for the first film, obviously, but he also shows an understanding of what made Michael Myers scary to begin with - his lack of dimension. Myers is, for all intents and purposes, pure evil, and Green acknowledges that in his simple yet effective approach to the character. His ambiguity and relentlessness are Myer's strongest aspects as a villain, and the sequels that attempted to add reason to his actions never succeeded in capturing the same effect. I'll also say I didn't want anyone to die in the film necessarily, or at least, there wasn't any character I found especially annoying; Stereotypical, maybe, but not grating.

And in the end, it helped immensely that I believed in Laurie Strode, and Curtis's performance. She doesn't phone this one in at all, and does a very good job at showing the history of the character. The rest of the acting is variable, though I must say I'm not as critical of Greer as a few people on this site. She's rather off at the start, admittedly, but I thought she did make up for it during the final act.

Michael McCarthy said...

Louis: I thought that might be the case. I’ve actually had trouble finding subbed versions that way even, but I’m sure if I’m persistent I’ll find one.

Also I’m surprised A Star Is Born isn’t on that list, I saw it about a week ago and it’s staying power has been downright impeccable for me.