Saturday, 29 April 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961: Franco Citti in Accattone

Franco Citti did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Vittorio "Accattone" Cataldi in Accattone. 

Accattone follows the titular pimp as he tries to move on after his prostitute who supported him is arrested.

Not quite realistic with some of the stylistic fantasies of sorts that happen later on, however none the less overall the realism is the approach and is the character known as Accattone played by Franco Citti. Citti's performance is very much like a character who fits the bill, not someone of some hidden beauties rather a very rough man who is existing in this particular world of his. Citti's performance certainly feels lived in, as we enter with him just lounging around as he does with the other men in his slummy existence, and Citti brings a kind of innately bawdy manner of the man engaging in the "Second? World's oldest profession". Citti though isn't someone who leaves you surprised or second-guessing as we see the man engage in his particular flesh trade which is not at all pleasant or sugar-coated here. Nor does Citti sugarcoat his treatment of his prostitute, he's a blunt and rough pimp in his manner and Citti emphasizes this in his performance. There's not some innate goodness, he's a thug pimp through and through. 

After his abhorrent activities lead to him being out of his prostitute, Accattone is forced to fend for himself which leads him mostly to drift around Rome with some slight intention of trying to find a replacement but really just more often just existing around his people as he does. And here is where I suppose the challenge of the performance is because Accattone isn't particularly likeable so why should we care about him drifting exactly? Well, I don't exactly, however, I wouldn't say this performance is a failure even if a more charismatic performance overall might've made me like the film more on the whole. Citti's performance does work as being convincing to this character and I guess there is something interesting about truly not being beyond what he is in some ways, even as there are some delusions here that he has about his existence. And while I don't think that truly shows hidden depths Citti does use these moments to suggest some depth within his performance, even if in a way that is still keeping Accattone not all that much more than you would've pegged him to be from the start. 

Citti's performance is convincing and that is worth something in terms of portraying the man going along and seemingly just engaging in nonsense that doesn't give him particular purpose even in his adventure to try to find the new prostitute. Citti presents this really more half-heartedly even, and while that might sound low energy, I'd say even that is with purpose. And again while not always aggressively engaging, it certainly never feels dishonest either. The man just prodding along in his sort of malaise is convincing as such and never feels at odds with anything aspect of the film. Citti's performance does work as such, as you do very much believe you are watching this pimp fall into a kind of aimless nothingness as he goes as he does without seeming to truly find anything of note to do with his existence. And I'll say while I certainly did not love this performance by any measure. I won't say that it doesn't remain somewhat intriguing nonetheless, even if it only engaged me up to a certain point. 

Saturday, 15 April 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961: Tatsuya Nakadai in The Human Condition III: A Soldier's Prayer

Tatsuya Nakadai did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Kaji in The Human Condition III: A Soldier's Prayer. 

A Soldier's Prayer is the final chapter in Masaki Kobayashi's outstanding trilogy about one man attempting to exist in the totalitarian society of Japan during World War II.

Each film of this incredible trilogy presents a different challenge to the notion of trying to remain decent, trying to keep one's humanity within a system, a country, a time, and a world where indecency and inhumanity rule. Tatsuya Nakadai's Kaji is the center of this terrible challenge that began in the first film as he attempted to humanely run a workcamp in China, a place where cruelty was the defining order, in the second film he attempted to be a "good" soldier in a horrible system where mistreating even their own recruits was a standing order, and in this final film, we open as Kaji is no longer within the confines of restraint of systematic cruelty, but rather in the fire of the chaos of a wartorn land. We open as Kaji a couple of other soldiers managed to survive the onslaught of the Soviet army and now are attempting to trek towards any kind of safety within what is believed to be Japanese-occupied China. And even in these earliest of scenes, the power of Nakadai's performance is relevant in giving one of the most accomplished transformations of a single performer through a series of films by showing us who Kaji is at the opening of this film compared to who he was at the opening of the trilogy.

His performance in the first film was that of the idealist despite everything that happened, and in the second film, there was more of the realist idealist, a man attempting to be good while dealing with the bad as honestly as he could. In the third film though so much of what he was is thrown out, while the brilliance of Nakadai's work is it feels so naturally honest to the experience of the character we had met at the start to who he is at the beginning of the end. Nakadai in fact is only 2 years older than when he starred in the first film but feels much older, and not due to his facial hair, but rather his expression that denotes the trauma of what he's gone through but more importantly what he is presently going through. This is a man who is no longer attempting to maintain this certain grace as the idealist living through this oppressive system, he is now a man trying to survive. Nakadai's performance internalizes this so powerfully early on in the film as the first act, to save himself and a few other soldiers, including the young Terada (Yusuke Kawazu) who looks up to him, is to kill a Russian soldier in order for them to get by. While formerly torn up in his murder, Nakadai now shows on the immediate surface the ability, really the function Kaji now has to kill, even if his eyes do denote still the pain deep within the man, mournful over what he has had to become. 

Nakadai gives what is truly a performance with the sense of survival as Kaji takes the lead among himself and a few other soldiers, despite not being the highest rank, as they attempt to find some kind of safety. And his performance is reflective of the condition of this state immediately. The sense of danger, the sense of death even is a constant in Nakadai's manner, he is someone who carries with him the caution within him, but also this striking persistence that seems a near constant within the man despite the severity of his situation. Nakadai accentuates every moment of this journey, along with Kobayashi's masterful direction, as the men try to push through. The sense of really an innate exhaustion is part of his performance and really just brilliantly performed in every regard as Nakadai simply is this. It is the state, although Kaji at this moment seems to be most able to survive, he is also very much within this situation at all times. He is being worn down, but he must persist. Nakadai's performance just so flawlessly realizes this specific dichotomy as he shows that Kaji is a man thriving, in as far as a man can thrive in such a wretched situation. The situation becomes all the more painful when the trio comes across a random group of Japanese civilians. 

This sequence, where the group is lost in a dense seemingly endless forest, is honestly one of the most harrowing put to film, as you see the group in such desperate straits that the civilians are just dropping like flies throughout the sequence in a way that is so matter of fact which makes it so painful. Nakadai throughout this scene shows how Kaji both has changed and stayed the same throughout this personal journey in the three films in his interactions with the civilians throughout. Because in part there is the blunt manner of a man who has to survive in this place, and when one group attempts to steal the parties food, Nakadai's intense dismissal against her pleas borders upon cruel, yet he delivers each word of thought as the truth of the situation, as a man who knows to allow such choices would lead to the death of all. Nakadai shows in some ways a distance in his eyes even when hearing about one of the deaths after another, his reactions are pitch perfect though because they aren't completely soulless, rather just adjusted to a difficult-to-penetrate shield of the man who must be callous in some ways to avoid dying, And there is still humanity in there, even if it is more intimate, more subtle than it is ever been, Nakadai still conveys it as within Kaji even if nearly dormant. A particularly affecting moment in this regard is when one of the women reminds him of his wife, and Nakadai's way of sort of drifting to the old Kaji in his expression is so heartbreaking because you see it but a momentary lapse into dreaming. 

Surviving the forest with few other than his soldiers, the men do appear to find some safety, albeit momentarily, however just as quickly find themselves right into the fire as the local Chinese have organized militias against Japanese soldiers, and still yet there are Japanese soldiers who firmly believe in their cause. Nakadai is amazing in these standoff scenes because he so naturally shows the growth of Kaji into a true leader as he faces off against one of the Japanese men, and throughout we see this different side of him which Nakadai flawlessly performs. That is in some ways Kaji is the leader of the people; Nakadai delivers this innate strength and conviction to every moment. His eyes become the man of action and Nakadai is wholly convincing in a way of portraying how these ordeals have at this moment strengthed Kaji as a man in some ways. There is a power to him as he manages to talk down to a pompous Japanese soldier and you see the man mixed with survival and idealism. The man who speaks his words as the truth, though now with a specific action to try to avoid the nonsensical continuation of the war and instead attempt to try to get home to his wife. There is a ferocity in Nakadai in these moments that creates a real sense of power even in a moment of seeming hopelessness. Hopelessness is persuasive as they quickly go right back into the fire facing off against the Chinese, who kill the last surviving peasant. Nakadai's great in showing in one moment the persistence in Kaji as he maneuvers around the war scape, bringing you into every moment of it through his moment, while also being devastating in his reaction to losing the woman he had some connection with. Nakadai in this instance shows the earliest Kaji in the pain in his reaction, but also where Kaji has gone in the violence in searing in his eyes as he considers revenge. 

And Nakadai's work is outstanding here in its ability to so reflexively interact with every situation, which manages to convey the heartbreak or horror of it, while often presenting the intensity and chaos. Nakadai never is lost, even if Kaji technically is, creating such a potent centerpiece that is this essential anchor to the film. Take a moment where Kaji, along with the other soldiers, escorts two refugees and Nakadai brings such a strict sincerity in his interactions with the young woman. His performance in the moment of respite brings again a beauty to humanity, albeit briefly however the gentleness is so powerful because you see this return to the man he was, and garners a real poignancy. Similar, though less poignant, is when he briefly talks politics with old friends as he questions a group of Japanese attempt to join the Americans in helping the non-communist Chinese forces, and for a moment you get a glimpse of the student, the socialist and pacifist in his pondering. Of course, such things are cut short when he learns that some of the escorting soldiers probably raped and maybe also murdered the young woman after he left. Nakadai's extraordinary because every time his performance shows you the pain in this unfortunate return back to the present horrors, and the intensity of his distaste is again the man hardened by war. Nakadai shows with so much power the outrage that conspires in Kaji as he goes about beating the man down. Nakadai in his performance alone creates the real tragedy of the story because within it is the human condition as we see that glimpse of the man perhaps finding hope again, only for it to be dashed again by the cruelty of the time and place that he exists in. 

This would maybe be enough for Nakadai to give a great performance, and he has, as we get to the end of seeming the journey as the man is the leader to the men as he goes to a refugee of Japanese women, and attempts to humanely figure out what to do next. Nakadai in this sequence brings a distinct stoic quality that defines the man by his determination to get home more than anything and maintain any decency he has left. Even as he frustrates others with his candor Nakadai exudes this with an honest conviction. There's a great moment where the Russians come calling and while Kaji is ready to battle, in his eyes it is the side of a man hardened by war, ready to kill, until one of the refugee women asks everyone to avoid violence, Nakadai's reaction is perfection in showing Kaji's conscience catching up with him and pulling back from that brink. Unfortunately, capture does not mean Kaji's troubles are over as he finds himself in the stay of the Soviets, who slide around in their compassion, meanwhile, Kaji tries to save the young Terada, which quickly gets him into hot water with the authorities, particularly because he isn't at all helped by the extremely corrupt Japanese "translator" who relays all his messages inaccurately often purposefully dishonestly. And while Nakadai's reaction initially is of the man still going along, still surviving, things only are exacerbated as he finds himself under the thumb again of the corrupt Japanese officers now used to police their own men though under Soviet watch, including the rapist that Kaji had beaten down earlier. 

We have a brilliant sequence for Nakadai as he attempts to negotiate and explain his actions, where he has been stealing minor things for survival, to the Soviets with the "help" of the bad translator. Nakadai's work in this scene is one of the greatest portrayals of frustration I've seen quite honestly as throughout the scene you see the man's passion for life, decency, and even politics waning away to his seemingly uncaring audience. His eyes slowly become more and more lost as it seems his words becoming meaningless, and his delivery goes from passionate, to frustrated to just becoming lost. His whole manner crumbled before the audience and just a man falling nearly into insanity, only getting a reprieve from a somewhat sympathetic Soviet officer who attempts to give him a lighter punishment. Unfortunately, the light punishment proves tragic as it takes him from being able to protect Terada. An important note to be their older/younger brother relationship throughout the film that is particularly striking in the prison scenes. Nakadai brings the last of Kaji's warmth and optimism as he encourages the younger man to survive and tries to help him see potential in the future. Terada though is essentially overworked and brutalized to death by the rapist, and with that, you have Kaji's breaking point. Nakadai now shows a man with conviction but without real hope in his eyes. His delivery is cold in a way that is disturbing as his intention to run from the camp to reunite with his wife no longer seems practical, rather it seems fatalistic. Before he attempts his escape though he first kills the rapist, and while it couldn't have happened to a worse person, Nakadai's performance though doesn't sell it as something easy to reckon with. Rather he delivers this fierce hatred of everything he's been outraging against, the humanity of the man nearly gone as he rages against the man for his lack of humanity. Nakadai is terrifying by showing any warmth left from Kaji as he cuts the man down, destroying him without mercy or pity. This leaves Kaji final march to attempt to get home and to describe Nakadai's work as stellar in this sequence seems an understatement. Nakadai is astonishing every step of the way, and in what is essentially a silent performance, other than his narration which is the repetition of this belief that he can get home. Nakadai's face becomes this state of ever-growing madness in his eyes and his manner as he slowly decays before us. In every frame, Nakadai loses some sense of self and some greater exhaustion. His performance shows in nearly real-time the decay of the man both in mind and body and it is an unforgettable sight as he loses himself. Nakadai is unbelievable as he brings us to the point of mutual breaking that couldn't be more heartbreaking, as his eyes seem to find this state of jubilation as he believes himself to be back home, while his whole physique is that of a dying man. His final moment of falling into his snowy grave is one of the most poignantly depicted losses of life ever onscreen. An extraordinary end to an already extraordinary performance, because Nakadai here he does show us the journey of this man, but potentially any man, attempting to be the best of humanity, while falling to the worst of it by the end. 

Saturday, 1 April 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961: Alberto Sordi in A Difficult Life

Alberto Sordi did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Silvio Magnozzi in A Difficult Life. 

A Difficult Life follows a communist journalist as he moves through life and much political upheaval in Italy starting from the end of World War II. 

This is the third time I'm covering an Alberto Sordi performance, and glad to do so as he has a one-of-a-kind presence onscreen. He's pretty fascinating in his innate presence because he very much looks the part of and has many traits of the comedic leading man. And while that is true, that is but the surface of his talents. It offers though an unlikely presence that also offers a very welcome idiosyncrasy by going through certain stories with such an original character. That is particularly true in this film's case as we follow Silvio in the opening of the film as part of a partisan group attempting to fight the Nazis near the end of World War II. And in these subsequence scenes, we get really what makes Sordi special. Because as this "hero" for us to follow we do get a definite reality upon his expression in the opening, showing a man in an innate state of desperation as he deals with unrelenting oppression, but we quickly see what Sordi can do beyond such overtures. 

His Silvio attempts his escape but soon is captured by a German soldier who intends to execute him. This sequence even is half a serious situation but also a comedic one because the way in which he gets caught is almost a "they're standing right behind me aren't they moment". This reasonably sounds ridiculous or tonally out of place, but it works because Sordi makes it work. Sordi's performance is able to convey desperation but he is also able to as naturally bring this quick instance of levity that makes the maneuver work. Sordi's wonderful because he *does* play into the comedy, but he does it in a way that also feels just so natural. He makes Silvio just naturally funny in a sense and by doing so makes it so for him to be funny in a situation, which just feels right rather than feeling out of place in any way. Sordi is able to not lose either side of the tone, instead blending them beautifully which is what can make a performance ideal given the material simply wouldn't work without Sordi's delivery of it at this moment. 

A defining twist of fate is when Silvio is saved at the last moment by a local woman Elena (Lea Massari) who kills the Nazi to save him and then hides him away. Although the initial encounter is that of mutual survival, which Sordi presents as just a very straightforward graciousness it soon switches to a romantic situation as the two come together as Silvio stays hidden away. The chemistry between Massari and Sordi has an innate richness about it, that isn't exactly simple warmth or love, yet the affection between the two is striking even as it is imperfect. They create the right sense of attraction even as the relationship from the outset is far from perfect. And we see this as soon as Silvio's partisan buddies are nearby he attempts to leave her to join back up. Sordi portrays this moment with a kind of naivety in the manner of just seemingly being a man without responsibilities and their romantic entanglement suddenly meaning less in an instance. Sordi is essential to this because he makes this pigheaded manner somehow not entirely off-putting but continues to have this hapless charm about him even when he is being a completely hapless fool. 

After the war though Silvio wants her back, and in the scene of asking her to marry him you are granted a sense of such sincerity in Sordi's performance. There he brings no sense of manipulation just care and genuine love at this moment. You sense the connection between the two which becomes an essential facet of this film. Because what we see really is not Silvio going through these political upheavals but specifically how he is going through them with his wife. This includes an extended scene where the two join a politically opposing dinner and sit and hear about the political shift. And I love the quiet sense of the pair of the two just in the way they are of a unit, a real duo at this moment, and the two are wonderful together in showing solidarity in this instance. Unfortunately, that doesn't last long as Silvio is arrested for his political activism shortly afterward, missing the birth of his child and even losing his newspaper job. Again powerful is the naturalism that he and Massari strike up in tandem. They just feel real together, in the moments of frustration with a crying child in a cramped apartment, to the joy of seeing their child recover from a serious illness. There is never a disconnect between the bitter and the sweet, the two create this natural flow of to people living life that is just wonderfully realized by both Sordi and Massari. 

I think what you see with Sordi's work, in general, is living in a particular way, which is that life isn't one tone, because this is an entirely convincing performance, even while very funny. There is a great scene for example where Silvio attempts to pass a verbal exam at university. Sordi is able to be very funny as he attempts to glance at the answers, however, in the same moment, his face creates such an easy empathy in the sorrow and frustration as he realizes how out of his depth in the moment. His delivery of Silvio's pleas for understanding is that of genuine passion, but again all in a moment that all feels natural as one. Sordi never loses his step and is impressive just how much he embodies the tone with such ease. Of course, this failure finally leads to a full breakdown of his relationship with Elena, where she leaves due to her dismissiveness towards her desire for stability. Leaving us with the misadventures of Silvio as he attempts to make something with his novel "A Difficult Life". Doing his sort of bumbling through life, finding some success, much failure, and seeing even his family growing up and perhaps even moving on. Sordi's performance is essential, because he is charming, he is funny, even when Silvio's actions are that of a fool, but also just because it all feels wholly honest to the character he has made so tangibly real. This is to the point when his behavior is of a boomerang, he doesn't completely lose you. And again, it is Sordi's ability to play the two sides, because as much as he's a proper jerk when diminishing Elena, his plea of honest care for her feels as sincere. In the end Silvio is a bit of a pathetic fool, but a rather endearing one thanks to Alberto Sordi.

Thursday, 23 March 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961: Peter Finch in No Love For Johnnie

Peter Finch did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning a BAFTA, for portraying Johnnie Byrne in No Love For Johnnie. 

No Love For Johnnie follows an MP as he struggles with love and his political career. As the Labor party refuses to give him a cabinet position and his wife leaves him. 

A quick sidebar I will say the more I see from Peter Finch the more I am impressed by his career-best work in Network, if only because this has been a bit of a reverse-engineered look, where I started with his final and best feature film performance, and have retroactively seen what his more expected presence was. This is to the point, I imagine if I had gone in the opposite direction I likely would've said "I didn't know he had THAT in him in" regarding his final film. Because the rest of his work, while consistently good and often more than that, fits much more within a certain type of somewhat repressed Englishman, dealing with emotional turmoil in a rather subdued way, as seen in Far From the Madding Crowd, Sunday Bloody Sunday, Girl with Green Eyes, and I'm sure more than that. No Love For Johnnie fits right into that ilk, as we enter into the film as we meet the middle-aged man trudging along in his existence, noted because of his political status, though that seemingly goes only so far. 

I'll say perhaps a flaw with the film itself is how it limits our sympathies with Johnnie, I mean come on, young Billie Whitelaw is into you, and she's literally a stairwell away, and you DON'T GO FOR THAT, get your stuff together Johnnie! I mean...uh we don't get really any of the man before this current situation, we get some mentions but even those are limited, so we start with the man in his hole, which is a bit of a curious start. The most we get before this is a brief interview with Johnnie over his party's success, and Finch delivers it with a politician's direct overtures and sort of muted emotion. He presents Johnnie as the statesman even as he suffers disappointment in not being selected for the "front row" and any kind of important position in the government. Finch portrays this rejection with a quiet resignation over the disappointment rather than any kind of more extreme heartbreak. His Johnnie as a politician seems set within a certain line of experience, of a man never quite where he'd like to be, but as someone who managed to be somewhere. 

We follow Johnnie home where his wife announces she's leaving him, and Johnnie is left alone, despite again his upstairs neighbor being quite eager to comfort Johnnie. Again what we see in Finch's performance is mainly resignation over this fact as he just seems to exist within this general sorrow, though honestly only turns to overt frustration when Whitelaw's Mary tries to comfort him. There we see a very aggressive side to the man, one that isn't all that pleasant honestly, and decreases any sympathies one can have for the man, even if he does halfheartedly apologize later on. Finch's performance I should say isn't the issue I have in this, mostly, in that everything he is depicting feels authentic, and in that sense, he makes Johnnie feel real, even if real in the sense Johnnie's isn't someone I'd particularly like to give my time or attention to. I would say perhaps another actor could've had more overt charm, which would've created a more inherent sympathy, even with the character's flaws, that isn't really the case for Finch whose general presence is fairly cold. 

Johnnie's journey is about attempting to reclaim love and his political life, one by dating a young model and the other by attempting some minor disruption of his party. In both, Finch is entirely convincing, albeit not entirely compelling in depicting both of these aspects. We see him in the depiction with the younger woman where Finch presents the sort of dormant lust in the man, and a bit more human desperate need for affection from the woman. Contrasting that as the politician we do get shades of a man a bit shrewder in his methods, whereas Finch does have this sort of precise delivery and manner as per expected of a man deep within the system. Again in both Finch does make the struggle feel real of the man filled with the need for happiness as he pours out all he's got towards the young woman, and contrasting that determination of the man trying to regain his power as best he can. I'll admit as much as I found Finch made all this believable, all this feel real, I just still didn't really care about Johnnie or anything that was going on with him at any point. And I can care about some reprehensible characters if compelling enough, but Johnnie isn't quite there. 

Part of this disconnect for me I do think is that we come into Johnnie with this perspective, where we are barely given a sense of the passion that put the man into politics. This is touched upon very briefly, and Finch has little to work with in terms of establishing this as something more substantial within his performance. The fact that he's even a further left labor politician feels cursory because what the man really stands for doesn't really come up. The most we get otherwise is Johnnie explaining his old struggles with his wife who never shared or showed that much affection for him. Finch is certainly good in the scene in showing the old pains as something that is quite severe in his manner, as tension in his eyes as something he's held onto for some time, but also something he just continues to live with it, even in pain. We see the slow defeat of the man, who has apparently been defeated personally all his life, as the title says there's "No Love for Johnnie". Finch depicts this breakout effectively enough as this breakdown of self-pity, with the emotion of it feeling real, though again still the emotional impact on me, as a viewer stays quite limited. Johnnie never becomes someone I terribly find all that engaging to explore, so he just kind of exists as he is. So when he finally finds some success, with a key conflict within, I personally just felt indifferent. And is this Finch or the writing? Well, mostly the latter I think, which I don't think does Johnnie any favors throughout because I do think the film needed more meat within the character's passions and his loneliness. Finch on the other hand does what he can, and does deliver a good performance, though I do feel strangely limited by shortcomings of that script. 

Saturday, 18 March 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961: Peter Cushing in Cash on Demand

Peter Cushing did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Harry Fordyce in Cash on Demand. 

Cash on Demand is a slight but effective thriller about a bank robber forcing a bank manager to comply with his robbery.

With the Christmas setting and the lead being a money lender, this film is in a strange way kind of reworking of the Scrooge story with Peter Cushing getting his chance to play Ebenezer Scrooge in a roundabout way as the then-modern bank manager Harry Fordyce. Peter Cushing is known best for his role in Star Wars or in various horror films, where he plays on some variation of chilling, kindly, or chilling while being kind. This is a completely different kind of performance from him as Harry Fordyce is just a man, and gives Cushing the chance to very much accentuate different aspects of his screen personality than one often sees from him. Even in the opening of the film where we see Fordyce go about his duties, it is notable that while this could've been the note for a classic cold Cushing note, Cushing actually makes much more of a variation here than that. His performance is actually almost entirely dissimilar, despite being quite effective with that known Cushing chill, this is a much more human depiction of a cold man.

And what that really means is that Cushing very much wants us to meet the manager Fordyce as a particular man but also in many ways a normal man as he comes into the bank. He has an uncaring expression about him, however an uncaring expression of a man who just doesn't care about anything other than doing his job. Cushing stare isn't penetrating rather it is just uncaring and focused upon his position. His delivery toward everyone in the bank is with a careless disregard and just a focus on business. Cushing modulates his work effectively though in portraying a man truly distant yet not nefarious in a traditional sense, just more bluntly kind of a jerk who isn't affectionate towards anyone. When an action leaves some cash missing in the bank by an employee, despite that employee having enough of a reason in his explanation, Cushing has no reaction other than uncaring disregard. His delivery is that of the bank official cutting down any notions of humanity as he is a man fixed just on keeping towards his task with the teller just being in his way. Cushing's performance though doesn't play it as overtly evil, as he certainly could've, but rather just the callousness of a man who puts the profits over people. 

Things change though as our plot begins with the entrance of a man Gore (André Morell) who claims to be there for the security of the bank yet instead is there in fact to rob the bank which he privately reveals to Fordyce. Cushing's performance is terrific even just the introduction of the man we see the coldness becomes alleviated as the man is a technical superior seemingly in the positioning around the bank and Cushing delivers a natural slight insecurity as Fordyce tries to impress the man. When the turn happens though that is even more of a switch as the hectoring Gore reveals he has Fordyce's family held captive, and they will be tortured if he doesn't comply with Gore's demands for cash. Cushing is excellent in showing the man completely and instantly thrown from his cold comfort as he becomes filled with tension and anxiety from the situation. And here is where really his setup was so important because Cushing never showed Fordyce as truly inhuman just very cold, and we see the man forced out of that cold authority with just a scared man beneath it all. Cushing is wholly genuine in reflecting the private man within the professional as his concern for his wife and child is immediate with an authentic immediate sense of real desperation. 

Gore has a complicated plan of robbing the safe which he needs Fordyce to follow every step of the way, and this is where the film becomes a two-hander of Gore purposefully pestering and mentally torturing Fordyce while Fordyce has no choice but to comply in order to save his family. Cushing really makes the movie, though Morell is quite a bit of fun in portraying just how much joy Gore gets out of this act, by creating the essential tension of a thriller of this sort. Every step of the process Cushing is 100 percent dialed in and you get the sense of the man making these split seconds decisions and the extreme nerves of the man every time they come close to failure. Cushing's performance is fascinating because, within this sense of desperation, he also begins to reveal an actual greater warmth beneath all the man. Every moment they come close to it, Cushing shows in his physical performance and with every line delivery how much the man tremendously does care about his family and is truly in pain within every moment of it. The man loses any of that cold control we saw before and just shows the very real fear of a father and husband needing to make sure his family will be safe. Cushing in every turn of the plot is exceptional in showing just how dialed in he is into the situation, making every moment far more tension-filled because within it all you see how much meaning this all has. Combine that with his reactions towards so many of Gore's pestering remarks, Cushing is rather moving even in showing the gradual sense of reflection in the man and sort of this intimate opening up of the man to having a greater sense for others around him. When he eventually pleads to note his family is all he has, Cushing is honestly powerful because in every word the sense of real love for the family but also the desperate loneliness of the man separated by that is remarkably performed. He manages to really play every scene with more than one layer in creating the sense of the immediate concern of "helping" Gore while also seeing that ever-constant anxiety combined with real a man seeing the faults he has in clear view. Cushing successfully brings you into the mind of such a cold man, in the beginning, to create some genuine empathy particularly later on when every one of his pleas is so deeply felt within Cushing's delivery. He even manages to create a convincing change of heart as at the end of the ordeal his greater sympathy to his workers, Cushing makes convincing because he's shown throughout the way the situation has broken down his reserve and forced a better man to come out of it despite it being a terrible situation. It is a terrific performance from Peter Cushing that shows he was very capable even outside of the types of performances he is most known for. 

Sunday, 12 March 2023

Alternate Best Actor 1961

 And the Nominees Were Not:

Peter Finch in No Love For Johnnie

Alberto Sordi in A Difficult Life

Tatsuya Nakadai in The Human Condition III: A Soldier's Prayer

Franco Citti in Accattone 

Peter Cushing in Cash on Demand

Wednesday, 8 March 2023

Alternate Best Actor 2022: Ram Charan & N.T. Rama Rao Jr. in RRR

Ram Charan and N.T. Rama Rao Jr did not receive Oscar nominations for portraying Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem respectively in RRR. 

RRR is a hyper-stylized film about two hyper-powered men during the time of British Imperialism in India. 

Although I wouldn't say my knowledge of Indian cinema is that deep, I'd argue a bit better than the average westerner, however common from what I've seen is the mixing of genres within a singular film, even from that RRR seems a particular extreme even in that regard. It is a dramatic, and at times brutal, Braveheart-style tale of a freedom fighter, it is a wild Fast and Furious-style reality-defying stunt set piece, it is a romantic comedy, it is a joyful musical, and a few more things than that. What is impressive is that all these works are at their extreme and an essential aspect of why that does fall to the performances of Ram Charan and N.T. Rama Rao Jr. Their performances basically must also be all these tones and genres leads of each type of genre as per needed for any given aspect of the film. The two begin from very different places however each initially portrays a sort of the most intense aspects of their characters. Rao begins as a man from a rural tribe determined to find his sister who has been captured by the villainous British. We find him as he's literally capturing a tiger for part of his quest. And in this aspect, this is largely not Rao's presence in the role of Bheem. This is kind of what we eventually see is kind of his fight mode. His fight mode though is that of a very intense pointed quality that shows the man really as his most focused. It is the right offering as it makes Bheem's manner clear as a man you do not want to mess with but is not vicious in that intensity. That is different from as we see Ram Charan as an Indian soldier in the British colonial army who single handed quashes an uprising. Charan's performance now is as intense as you could name any brutal thriller as his eyes are piercing, and on his side in this vicious sense of a man with purpose. Both Charan and Rao are intense, but what is impressive is the way they are intense in very different ways as one is a man with a specific family mission against Charan who at first seems as though he's set up against the world entirely. 

The men, despite being seemingly on opposite sides of a potential conflict, end up becoming friends by chance after a most epic rescue that involves one of the most epic handshakes in cinematic history. And with that, we get perhaps one of the strongest aspects which is the bromantic power the two have in their chemistry with one another. The two in a way take upon a bit of a city/country mouse kind of thing as Charan's Raju and Bheem take on a natural chemistry with one another that just is really a constant exuding of warmth between the two in their interactions. The slight difference being Raju occasionally shows Bheem the ropes about something as Bheem is out of his setting compared to the more seasoned Raju. As much as the two were so convincing when they were intense they are as convincing when they are just being easygoing. The two really manage to bring you into the endearing energy they share together and it is hard not to believe them instantly as an ideal friendship, even while they are technically seemingly dramatically opposed. There is more to this than just a positive outgoing quality though as we see the dynamic between the two as Bheem tries to talk, to the degree that he can due to the language barrier, to an Englishwoman he chances upon. Rao manages to find just the right preciousness in his portrayal of the rather meek way in which Bheem approaches this, and portrays sort of that shy insecurity in a way that is once again very endearing. This particularly contrasts well against Charan's performance that always exudes a tremendous amount of confidence but in turn, when we see him encouraging and advising Bheem, it is conveyed with both a real sense of wisdom on how to project confidence but also this sense of unguarded support towards a friend. 

Within this aspect is the highlight of the film where Bheem and Raju take on the pompous British in a dance off "Naatu Naatu". Something we also get in the closing number "Sholay" is the level of exuberance rarely seen in any performance, and we get that times two here with Rao and Charan. It isn't just that they sing and dance, they sing and dance with as much intensity as they do anything else in the film, except the purpose here is for the sake of just being purely joyous. And the thing is, it is hard not to get caught up with that energy when watching them as the joy is truly infectious as they make for an extremely entertaining pair just to watch have fun in this way. In a weird way, their dance scene doesn't feel like a show-off moment, but rather like a let's all have fun together moment where they bring you into just enjoying the moment with them because their expression of the moment is so very pure. And pure together, as again that bond the two actors establish really is just so very powerful, making everything seem tragic early on as we know the two are on opposite sides, but they don't. And it is an example where earnestness to the extreme works because the two of them are earnest in such an effectively sincere way. When we see Rao playing so shyly, and Charan having that confidence between the two, it is hard not to just see the best for them because every moment of it just feels right even as it is extreme in this sense. We even have a theoretical very melodramatic situation as Raju gets poisoned and finds out that Bheem is a man he is supposed to stop as a soldier. And Charan's quiet reaction of heartbreak very much goes right for the most obvious heartstring, but it is a time when that heartstring is just the right one to be played. 

That is again combined though with the two as these pure action hero types who must also sell every dramatic swing, of which there are many. Both are a bit different in this sense, and again an effective contrast between the two. Rao's performance is consistent as the humble warrior with conviction. His conviction though is very specific in showing it from this modest sort of emotional drive which he depicts well in his one scene in showing his sorrow in seeing his caged sister, and just overwhelming passion as the man of attack. His scenes of action are very specific with this sort of controlled power of the man with this sort of righteous energy that defines him. Rao's performance is effectively straightforward in the right way where he shows really the power in the character's singular conviction to his particular cause that is more so defined by family than anything. Against that is Charan's performance which works in contrast as the more complex depiction of the man really has two shades constantly, and again this singular intensity could be of the villain or of a proper naturally violently inclined protagonist. Charan effectively plays this note and doesn't skim over it showing really the sense of a more pointed manner, that often is speaking two things at once. One is often the friend, with the man trying to find the man, who is his friend, or later when we see him with the British, he presents the perfect soldier, but his eyes always denote that there is definitely more going on. And that is the case as we eventually learn that he too is fighting against the British but in the form of an extremely long-game attempt to try to get weapons for his home army to fight the British. This works as a revelation of a man of the intensity of a man with a singular purpose, but who has also been holding in so much. When the revelation happens it does work because Charan reveals that the intensity was for that purpose, and not for being any sort of brutal investigator. Although I wouldn't say this film gets into too much of the deep problems of being so deep cover, Charan in what the film needs delivers well on a sense of that even if we don't dive beyond a certain point with that. Eventually, the two men do come together, and it completely works because the friendship was so real we just naturally see the two become a team with their intensity coming together in a cathartic act of the two teaming up to take down the British. And with each man, we see their separate power in a way with Rao depicting that kind of more controlled power of Rheem against the more firebrand quality of Raju. The two become proper William Wallaceesque freedom fighters that are extremely easy to root for as they take down their oppressors. Both excel in this ending action, but they really excel in every disparate aspect of the film. The two ease every transition themselves because they sell every aspect with as much heart and passion as possible. Both are intense heroes, charming romantic leads, and wonderful song and dance men. There is no split, they are all of it, and they do it together.