Showing posts with label Nick Nolte. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nick Nolte. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 April 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004: Results

10. Daniel Wu in New Police Story - Wu makes for a pretty whiny and obnoxious villain. Not in a way that works either. 

Best Scene: Last "duel".
9. Cameron Bright in Birth - Bright delivers on the specific hollow note asked of him but never makes an impact beyond that. 

Best Scene: Being challenged.
8. Tim Meadows in Mean Girls - Meadows finds the right tone for the material hitting his comedic marks while still being believable. 

Best Scene: Riot control.
7. William Hurt in The Village - Hurt manages to deliver what dramatic heft he can from the tricky material even if it only allows him to go so far with it. 

Best Scene: Explaining his decision. 
6. Bud Cort in The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou - Cort gets the most out of his unusual role being both funny but also finding his own little arc as the surprisingly supportive "bond company stooge". 

Best Scene: Human being. 
5. Billy Bob Thornton in The Alamo - Thornton is the most interesting part of his film finding honesty in his deconstruction of man who knows he doesn't live up to his "living legend" status. 

Best Scene: Talking to Bowie. 
4. Nick Nolte in Clean - Nolte gives a very quiet and moving portrayal of man managing his own grief while also trying to honestly negotiate between family members dealing with the same loss. 
 
Best Scene: Important talk with his grandson.
3. Alfred Molina in Spider-Man 2 - Molina manages to thrive within the idea of the comic book villain while still providing essential grounding to provide balance. 

Best Scene: Finale. 
2. Peter O'Toole in Troy - O'Toole provides honest gravitas to tricky material and even more importantly emotional truth. 

Best Scene: Priam speaks to Achilles. 
1. Al Pacino in The Merchant of Venice - Good predictions Omar, Tony, Bryan, Shaggy, Tybalt, Tahmeed, Ytrewq, Luke, Robert, Harris, Maciej, Tim, RatedRStar, My top three of the year all are dealing with tricky material. O'Toole finding life in material that so many become stiff and awkward from. Hoffman finding genuine comedy even when so much of the attempted comedy around him is falling flat. Then Pacino who is in a slightly different situation in that he's dealing with Shakespeare however trying to accentuate a certain context many would argue was not intended in the original material. Pacino though excelling in this alternative approach and finding humanity within his "villain". Although I still settle on Hoffman. Because honestly being good in the bad comedy is a particularly rare occurrence and it's notable while I still found his film largely unfunny, I still laughed thanks to Hoffman. And really put say Dan Fogler, or even Jack Black into that role, I don't think they would've escaped the mediocrity let alone make the mediocrity into something that actually worked.  

Best Scene: "Do we not Bleed" 

Next: 1953 Lead

Monday, 13 April 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004: Nick Nolte in Clean

Nick Nolte did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Albrecht Hauser in Clean. 

Clean follows a drug addicted woman, Emily (Maggie Cheung), dealing with the aftermath of her longtime companion and the father, a musician, of a child who dies from a drug overdose. 

Nick Nolte plays the father of the deceased man who we see early on taking the news where Nolte’s reactions suggest a dad who really probably had a good relationship with his son at one time but has been lost and separated from his life for a good long time. His reaction to losing him is moving in the rather subdued reaction where Nolte conveys the complicated feelings of heartbreak but with a certain distance of that sense of separation with his son for some time. An idea continued when we first see Albrecht interact with Emily, where he suggests that she give some time away from her own son given the very difficult circumstances of the situation. Nolte’s very good in managing to find a tone within his delivery where we feel no sense of Albrecht playing a note of self-righteousness or meanness. Rather in Nolte’s sensitive delivery you see a certain awkwardness with her, a struggle to speak the words who knows the situation is tough, yet in his eyes and in his manner he is emphasizing a man who very much cares about his grandson’s well being and the ask for Emily to take a step back as she deals with her own personal struggle is from a place of genuine concern. Nolte doesn’t make it simple though and shows that Albrecht himself is just trying to do what he thinks is best in an extremely difficult situation. 

We check in with Nolte a few times as Albrecht continues to deal with the struggles of the dad. We see him in the strange situation as he has to try to make decisions regarding his son’s music. Nolte’s portrayal brings such a sincerity in his slightly confused reactions to talking to the producer and reacting to the suggested artwork for the albums. Nolte captures the sense of a man being in a totally alien world, that grief still nagging in his eyes, and just in every “Sure I guess” delivery being a man who wants to do right by his son yet within that is realizing just how out of his son’s world he was. Something we see extend when Albrecht is speaking to his ill wife about the choices, who speaks her own doubts about. In every word of trying to justify the decisions, Nolte alludes to this messy inability to really know exactly what his son was like but with still a strong sense that he loved his son despite that struggle. A struggle that only continues as the matter comes of whether or not his grandson should interact with the troubled mother or not. Nolte continues to excel in creating such effortless complication in his reactions including even his own grandson expressing his dislike for Emily. Where we get Nolte’s defense for her, which isn’t as simple as a heroic push back, rather again this quiet but powerful earnest understanding and empathy of someone who truly wants to allow Emily a second chance and to get to know her own son. 

Nolte never simplifies an element within this however as when he brings his grandson to spend time with Emily there are some restrictions from the man. Where we saw his empathy for Emily, we see his empathy for his wife and his grandson just as much in this moment as now he’s the one challenging her just as he challenged his wife and grandson’s own views of her. Nolte is able to express this coming from the same place of duty and genuine care. In every word it isn’t a threat, but rather very much a most honest and respectful demand for the sake of everyone that she not overstep these boundaries. Nolte is wonderful in the way he is able to combine simple straightforward love and empathy, with the complexity of trying to maneuver through such a difficult situation that will be good for Emily, his grandson and his wife. Nolte’s performance expresses consistently the weight of such a task, and is very moving because in his eyes you see the man who just wants to try to make the best he can out of a very challenging situation. There were so many ways this performance could’ve mis stepped a little bit into the more melodramatic. Nolte though glides through this work where every moment it is with the strong sense of a history we never saw. The history of a love for his family but even so the extension of that history, where we see the man even extending to a woman he barely knows but knew that his son cared for. Nolte instead of being secondary, he honestly makes Albrecht’s story a parallel moving depiction of grief and the challenges of moving forward with that loss. 

Monday, 16 March 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004

 And the Nominees Were Not:

Al Pacino in The Merchant of Venice

Peter O'Toole in Troy

William Hurt in The Village

Nick Nolte in Clean

Billy Bob Thornton in The Alamo

Predict These Five, Those Five Or Both.

Tim Meadows in Mean Girls

Daniel Wu in New Police Story

Cameron Bright in Birth

Alfred Molina in Spider-Man 2

Bud Cort in The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou

Thursday, 25 July 2024

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1998: Jim Caviezel, Sean Penn & Nick Nolte in The Thin Red Line

Jim Caviezel did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Pvt. Robert E. Lee Witt and Sean Penn did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sgt. Edward Welsh in The Thin Red Line.

I will admit a film I already loved, I might've loved it even more watching this time, perhaps because no matter where the film wanders to there is something to treasure in this unique exploration of a single battle in World War II, covering as a battle, but also a spiritual experience. The key relationship in pondering the key themes of the film is between Jim Caviezel's Private Witt and Penn's Sergeant Welsh. Two characters that are in terms of their original conception continuations of Montgomery Clift's and Burt Lancaster's characters in From Here to Eternity, although adapted in the sequel novel, and adapted again by Malick's screenplay that is far from a straightforward adaptation. Seeing these men as continuations of those men, does make sense, as we open the film with Witt, like Clift's Prewitt, in a state of anti-establishment, here as a deserter with another soldier living an idyllic life with tribal people on a remote island. Caviezel would become best known for playing literal Christ in The Passion of the Christ, plays a Christlike figure, though not as simple as that, as his Witt is of his own place, however it is Christ like in that he seems to be experiencing life beyond what the rest of us are able to see. Say what you want of some of Caviezel's later choices, however he is perfectly cast here, and embodies this role so effortlessly from the first scene we see him as part of this landscape that seems to evoke the beauty of life. Caviezel's performance with minor midwest drawl, though not emphasized, just simply is within this state of mind, something of the joy he expresses as he interacts and almost is one with the natives. Caviezel's specific way though isn't of just simple pleasure of not being at war, it is more fundamental as the man seems at peace beyond just not fighting, rather his soul has found an experience he is able to bond with. Something that ends when an American patrol boat comes across them and takes them into custody.

Leading us to Sean Penn as Sergeant Welsh, a performance that one could describe as the promise I've always seen in Penn, even if he frequently acted in the way of it. As I've made no misconception that Penn is not one of my favorite actors, given he often covers his talent with needless overacting, however within this film this is the purest and most honest performance he's ever given. And we see this in the first of three scenes of philosophical discussion between Welsh and Witt, which I'd say are among my favorite scenes in the film, but nearly every scene of this film leaves me in a bit of awe. Anyway you have contrasting men, and contrasting performances, however connecting all the same which is perhaps where the real power of both performances exist. Penn's performance is without mannerism, without accent, without anything on top of it, he plays Welsh right at you without anything to obscure this man, and is absolutely brilliant in being so direct. Fitting to the direct man that is Welsh, though simple he is not, as we see him breakdown Witt's situation where he's managed to prevent any serious punishment for the man. Something Penn delivers as a blunt stick of a man trying to get through with the rebellion within the squad he "runs". And already there is something special in the chemistry with Caviezel and Penn, because while this film makes no mention of a being a continuation of From Here to Eternity, that sort of history of the man of the army and the man of his own choices, already seems part of them, as the two both seem certain of each other and such a sense of rich history is in every interaction. And that counterpart to Welsh's order comes in Caviezel's performance, which I think shows something more than simply being a Christ-like figure rather he's in this state of transition that he isn't entirely sure of himself. And we see maybe the old Witt, that does seem closer to Clift's Prewitt, as he shrugs off Welsh's "deal", and notes how he can take anything Welsh will give out. There is rebellion in this moment, disregard, and a power to Witt, as he even states that he's "twice the man" Welsh is, you believe him in this almost anarchist strength that reflects their past.

I could try to move on from that scene but there's too much richness in it, as we go beyond the army to the world  as Welsh seemingly tries to get through to Witt, by stating his view of the world, which we have two statements and two layers of Penns' performance. As his first statement that a man is "nothing" and that there "ain't no world but this one", Penn's delivery is a weaponized cynicism, almost gloating in his delivery in a method to have Witt accept the facts as he presents them. Something that Witt immediately counters as "having seen another world", that is one of the most beautiful and poignant line deliveries, as there is such ethereal optimism that Caviezel conveys, however the line itself isn't that of a zealous assurance, rather most men of an honest faith struggling with said faith. As his face so naturally lowers into sadness as he continues the line of he thinks sometimes the other world was merely his imagination. Caviezel effortlessly conveys the conflict of the man's soul of desiring to believe in this better world, but in no way having the certainty of a fanatic. The notion of the "other world" seems to impact Welsh, and Penn's masterful in the way his delivery takes in Witt's words in Welsh's response. He's again coming at him with cynicism, however a personal man to man, even familiar way as he shrugs that Witt's seen something he never will. Penn's performance is the first moment that alludes to far more to Welsh than just being an army pusher, as there's an ounce of regret in his own statement, following by stating a selfish view that in the war basically every man has to look out for himself. Penn's delivery is different from the previous statement on the world, now as this type of caution to Witt rather than a command. Leaving the scene by Welsh noting that he may be the best friend Witt's had. A curious statement given their clash in their scene, and can perhaps be taken as just Welsh towing the army's lines of getting a man in line by being his friend. However, Penn's subtle expressions in the scenes make it anything but as there is far more than that, which I will hold off onto towards the end of this review.

The film progresses into the field of battle, where the film focuses on the lives of so many of the soldiers, where Welsh and Witt occasionally are visited within the chaos of the campaign. Witt and Caviezel's performance are curious within the grand scheme of the film, as much as he's not always on screen, he is a common factor within scenes, and suddenly appears at times, almost as though he is a spirit watching over the men, despite very much being a real man. Curious in an absolutely captivating way as Caviezel's performance expresses this different journey Witt goes through while still being part of the battle, even at one point volunteering again for active duty. He's not suddenly a pacifist within the scheme, but he's also not just one of the men either. He is on his own journey which often is through brief moments as we see Witt within the battle each time, and Caviezel's work is fascinating. Fascinating in a way that if it had not been perfect it would've been terrible, thankfully he's perfect. In that Caviezel's work is always on a different wavelength, and often is a man seemingly between the two worlds he spoke of in mind though perhaps not body. Caviezel's work makes every moment in which Witt appears to have an impact by offering this alternative expression of a soldier that doesn't follow any expected tradition. There are moments he's part of the fight but never do we see aggression. There are moments where he volunteers even, but that doesn't seem like heroism, rather even the way Caviezel delivers these moments is as though Witt must perform the action as though he's called to, rather than commanded to. And what is so fundamentally remarkable within Caviezel's portrayal is that as otherworldly as it is, he presents as this matter of fact truth to Witt. Caviezel crafts this calm yet insight about it, one especially potent moment is during the accidental death of another soldier, and we see Witt watch him die. Caviezel, through the most minute changes, manages to create empathy, sadness, but also a kind of enlightenment as though for a moment he's seeing the man's soul before it leaves this world. Another is when he's observing an enemy soldier, and while we see him take a difficult encampment as a soldier, Caviezel as Witt watches the enemy doesn't see them angrily as killers of his comrades, nor annoyed at needing to deal with them or even the distance necessary to kill. Rather it is with this empathetic calm, and we see him see them as people, only as a man who can tap into this unknown could, and brings such beauty to the moment Witt offers an enemy captive gum, not as a ploy, or even an olive branch, just kindness to his fellow man.

Welsh too is among the men, though certainly differently from Witt, as a man trying to keep them together in their advancement, though Penn carries the expression of the hardened soldier, who is there to survive. As man too who seems perhaps different in his own way, as Penn too is observing constantly in his performance, always present in a way that differs from others as the man observing and trying to understand everyone and everything around him, though if you were to ask Welsh he'd deny such a claim. Welsh being the selfish survivalist, something though he is lying that we alluded to in the first conversation with Witt, but we see more abundantly during the battle when a screaming wounded man is trapped out of cover. Penn's performance is outstanding in the scene as you see him watching as he does, then just have conviction in his eyes as he runs out, as selflessly as you can be as he gets to the man. And Welsh is as empathetic as any man could be as he offers to save the man, and every moment of Penn's performance is wholly in concern for the dying man. Welsh is torn apart as he can only offer the man an overdose of morphine to ease his pain, and Penn is heartbreaking in that moment of realization. When he returns from his selfless mission, Welsh tells the truth, if seemingly towing his callous line, as his Captain wants to cite him for his bravery, however Welsh adamantly refuses any such mentions dismissing medals as property. Penn's performance is incredible because you see the way Welsh instantly hides his empathy in the rejection showing a kind of anger covering it all up, in part in genuine belief for life rather than reward, but also anger of a man who needs to be callous rather than collapse from the emotional turmoil of the moment.

Our second conversation between Welsh and Witt comes in the middle of the battle, where despite the conflict based upon their views, the connection despite the theoretical connection is tremendous. And we see the change in the performances, Penn puts no army bravado, now it is just honesty, even if a bit of personal force behind trying to convince Witt of his single worldview. Penn's subtle shift here though quietly evokes concern within Welsh for Witt, no longer as man just trying to get a soldier to do his duty, now alluding to something more in trying to keep Witt alive. Contrasting that is Caviezel as Witt is further in his journey, no longer needing to argue with Welsh over the notion, rather there is a clarity in his eyes as the man is finding this way to look beyond. The two men, as much as Welsh would never admit, are more connected to what is going on around them then almost anyone else, though Penn's performance is a man of the earth, while Caviezel is the man of the soul as we progress. And we see this as each interacts with other soldiers, Penn is incredible in another scene where a soldier callously dismisses any concern, which Welsh thought he was, and we see in Penn's performance, as he so perfectly articulates Welsh's mindset in this conversation. Because we see the man who thought he was the man he's talking to, numb to the world only caring about himself, however now Welsh explains himself as not there yet based on expectation with an exasperation at first as though he would like to be numb, yet his eyes present a sorrow as he continues to speak, and shows that Welsh will never be that numb, in fact may be incapable of being so despite what he tells others. Penn shows the suffering of a man who wishes he couldn't care, but cares so deeply. Caviezel presents Witt's interactions alternatively as this comforting factor towards almost everyone he comes across, as he walks, nearly glides in his manner that brings this understated warmth of a man who has this peace within himself, even as he exists within a battlefield.

Our third conversation between Witt and Welsh comes during the respite in fighting, and in our most relaxed circumstances between the men. And this scene is as rich as their first together, maybe richer in some ways, as both men are in a different place from the battle and we see them slightly out of the confines of the war, though certainly still aware of it, within the familiarity that Penn and Caviezel deliver in this scene. Each man challenges each other still, though the delivery this time is so different and essential in conveying each man in that different place. Caviezel has that impeccable calm about him as he maneuvers through the lonely hut the two are inhabiting. Contrasting Penn who is exuding the exhaustion of what they have been through so far and brings this casual practicality about it, as man getting straight to it though in what can be described in a friendly way. As he questions Witt if he's "making trouble" by not conforming, Penn speaks not as an attack but as a knowing sort of between friends dig. Something Witt doesn't allow any disconnect in as he speaks with such a powerful yet reserved way of reaching to Welsh with "you do care about me, don't you sergeant? I always thought that you did", is so beautifully spoken as Caviezel brings such a potent sense of love in the words, and breaks down any notion of conflict by pointing out the kindness of Welsh despite how he makes himself out to be a "rock". I adore especially when Witt, with all sincerity from Caviezel, asks if Welsh gets lonely, to which Penn's delivery "only around people" is a bit cynical aside however, in his expression you also see how true it is to Welsh's state as the man who believes he must be hard but is just a soulful deep down. Welsh's followup change of subject "your still believing in the light are you" is this soft challenge, Penn not quite making fun of it, but trying to take away some of the gravity of the idea in his asking at first. However as he continues with "how do you do that, you're a magician to me", Penn so naturally and so honestly shifts with the slight crack in his voice, to see that Welsh does truly want to know. Followed by Caviezel's "I still see a spark in you" with Cavizel somehow so naturally in this place of otherworldly grace as he wholly inspires in the beautiful yet so simple way of expressing it. But even that might not be the most potent moment, as Penn's reaction is heartbreaking as his expression of Welsh is about to break down fully, as though his attempt at a cynical world view is so pained by Witt having this optimism for him. I can praise the actors enough in frankly making for me one of the poignant scenes in any film, and what the scene also shows is getting back to that "best friend" line of the first scene, we know is an absolute truth. Welsh is Witt's best friend, but truer though is Witt is Welsh's best friend, something Welsh knows deep in his heart. And we find this in the final moments of this film, as Witt goes off on another dangerous mission where he makes a heroic sacrifice to draw the Japanese forces away from the rest of his unit, leading him to be surrounded. A scene that works because of Caviezel's performance, where Witt willingly chooses to sacrifice himself and not surrender moving onto another world...or perhaps his imagination, it is for each of us to decide that. But Caviezel's work is astonishing because you see the way, this passage in his eyes, as begins as a man surrounded by enemy soldiers in fear and in adrenaline of the chase, however then Caviezel's expression changes as he so powerfully suggests the man now fully looking beyond his current state and accepting his faith to see another world. Absolutely stellar work, and to compliment that is Penn's heart wrenching final scene as he stands above a buried Witt pondering where his spark is now. Penn's performance is incredibly moving because it isn't the cynical man being proven right or gloating in any way, it is just a friend torn up having lost a man he cared about needing to now continue on this world alone.
Nick Nolte did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Lt. Col. Tall in The Thin Red Line.

Nolte once again in 98 subverts his usual presence, while bringing that presence here to the role of the Army colonel leading the attack on Guadalcanal. A role that in most films would be that of the internal villain pushing the army in the wrong ways and the wrong direction, though while his actions still can be described as villainous, the character of Col. Tall isn't so simple. Part of that is the brilliant way he is introduced as he's receiving his instructions from his superior officer, very much prodding him for success in the upcoming battle, while also essentially noting that the Colonel is a bit behind for his age in terms of advancement in the military. Which already is such a different side to Nolte already as he's very much the submissive in this conversation, which is particularly remarkable when John Travolta is playing the superior officer. Nolte eagerly nodding along to every suggestion, and even threat that he best accomplish what he is being tasked with, and such subtle sense in his work of the glint of fear of the task of a man knowing he will stay exactly where he's been if he doesn't do what the general is asking him to do. But there's more within Malick's genius choice to let us in on the thoughts of the "villain" , thoughts that are filled with such vulnerability, delivered so differently by Nolte than the rest of his performance, as his voice is of an exhausted and sad man. There's no pride in his voice in his contemplation, in his choices to try to fulfill this ambition, it is rather this near heartbreak of an acceptance of a man pushing himself to do what he knows isn't right to do what he thinks he must. As context that instantly prevents Tall from being a standard army brass character, and becoming so much more as the film progresses.

Like Welsh and Witt, Tall too has a counterpart, though very different here in Captain Staros (Elias Koteas), the man leading the direct assault of Tall's campaign. The first instance in which Tall and Staros come into conflict is when the progression of the attack has stalled due to a seemingly impenetrable, from a direct attack, machine gun nest. Nolte's performance is as the villain as he brings such a vicious bluster as he comes in strong and hard, demanding that Staros attack regardless of the extremely likely casualties. Nolte brings this ferocity of something more than just wanting to progress in this battle, but a man whose whole life's purpose is reliant on this attack. Nolte's is great because he doesn't play this one note, despite the fact that Tall is presenting himself to Staros in trying to force the attack, as even the way Nolte wipes his head in the argument that signals a bit of the truth behind the presentation. Staros, who empathizes with his men above all else, refuses directly against orders. Though they are talking over the phone, each performance works against the other so powerfully as Koteas brings this calm against Tall's raging to try to get it, but again Nolte in just a subtle moment shows the weakness in this ferocity. Nolte presents a man who is pushing forth this anger as his way of believing he must. Nolte portrays the character not as a man who is as just as he is, but a man believing he must be something more than who he might actually be.

We see this as he gets towards the front, and Nolte's physicality is just pitch perfect as we see, as his narration also denotes a man very much "playing a part" in his far more somber, far more naturally human delivery within the man's mind. Nolte walks up to the front line with all this swagger, essentially presenting himself as the "ideal" commanding officer as he comes into the front line with two methods in his arsenal. That is more rage with Staros as the dog barking his orders as the tough commander and the other as the inspiring of his troops. There's a great brief moment as he walks through with a stick, tapping it on a soldier and "come on son" as Nolte performs it as though Tall is ready to be photographed for a propaganda poster encouraging men to face their enemy as brave soldiers. Nolte continues this as Tall states his belief that this battle could be the turning point of the war and argues with Staros over what it will take. Nolte is fantastic in the way he nearly rambles on about the potential of the battle with this specific enthusiasm of the man's ambition but also this way he delivers the callousness of which Tall prods Staros about sacrificing his men. Nolte prods with every question presenting as this attempted simplification of trying to avoid really dealing with the idea, rather than making it seem some absurdity that his men won't die. My favorite moment of the scene is after he's done, where Staros very quietly gives a passive "you might be right", Nolte brings vulnerability within the attempted dominating way of speechifying. His "speech" being that Staros should just assume Tall is right, although an attempt at domination, Nolte brings just the right combination between the force the man wants to push but in his eyes not nearly the certainty to truly command the way he would wish.

After the hill is taken, Nolte is just outstanding in the amount of jubilation he brings in just walking it as though he has made the achievement with no sense of the life lossed, just the joy of what "he" has accomplished. When one of his soldiers John (John Cusack), who made the brave move against the hill makes a few requests, Nolte is so good in the way he fluctuates on so many levels of Tall in the scene. When John simply asks for a way, Nolte shows this sort of built in instinct in playing the part of the tough colonel, "Forget the way" with a callous disregard for the health of the very men that have accomplished his "dream" so far. Nolte's amazing the way he shows it though, as the way the man beneath that catches himself when he acknowledges who he is talking to, and suddenly his voice becomes almost whisper quiet, much more human, as he offers some weak attempts at assurances. Nolte moving between the bark and the meek whimper between the two in his argument. As John doesn't relent, Nolte is mesmerizing as he goes off in the very truth of Tall in speaking about what this truly represents to his whole life in the army, there is a thrill in the idea as he sings the possibilities, but in this same mania there is such pontent, and deep seeded frustrations of an older man left behind within his career. Nolte excels in showing all of that vulnerability in the man, trying to present himself as anything but. Within it the true motivation of the man. My favorite moment of the great scene for Nolte is right at the end though where with genuine pride in Nolte's voice Tall thinks of John as a son to him, however again it continues as he notes that his actual son is a bait salesman. Nolte brings so much in this one line, in the way he speaks it so regretfully, and in his eyes you see a man so lost in his life, with this war, in his mind, being the only solution to give it meaning.

The conflict between Staros and tall culminates as Tall relieves Staros of his command. A great scene for both actors because of the disconnect both articulate so beautifully. Koteas so beautifully shows the man who cares about every one of his men, where Nolte comes in representing the "need" for the push for the war. Nolte's performance so flawlessly creates this very difficult idea of a man selling a false bag of goods, who knows it, but isn't *quite* a con man either. Nolte's great in the way he speaks every word of "firing" Staros as not being "tough enough", as he brings this kind of casual disregard as though he wasn't meeting a work quota, rather than was vouching for the lives of human beings. Tall this time stays steadfast, however Nolte still shows that he must sell his own certainty, to himself in a way, as he speaks about the cruelty of the jungle as a talking point, then segues towards this almost friendly way of softening through a "severance package" of military decorations. When Staros asks "why" Nolte is tremendous in the way he wraps this insecurity of the man, by again first just saying for his wounds as though he's doing it as a favor, but as the question needles at him, that bluster comes out again of a man covering up so much to convince himself what he is doing is right. The decision is followed by orders, where we get a final standout moment for Nolte as he looks on silently alone looking at the corpse of dead men. Nolte is outstanding in Tall seeing the dead men he sacrificed, and that loss finally registering on his face so powerfully in his performance. So powerful because we see the man stripped of all his ambition, all of his reasoning, just looking at the result, and Nolte conveys this quiet internal revelation of maybe the better man that was within, which he hid away for the sake of war. Nolte delivering yet another truly great performance in this film, creating such a dynamic and human portrait that creates such tremendous depth to the type of role that usually is one note. Nolte gives his greatest turn by not rejecting the note, rather showing the very real person who has compromised himself to craft that "note". 

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Best Supporting Actor 2011: Results

5. Jonah Hill in Moneyball- Jonah Hill's performance is functional enough, but it never really stands out as anything that needed to be awarded.
4. Nick Nolte in Warrior- Nolte tries hard and gives a descent performance, but as with all of his performances, he never completely realizes the potential of his part.
3. Christopher Plummer in Beginners- Plummer's performance almost seems misused in the course of the film muting his emotional impact, when Plummer is on screen though he gives an effective enough of a performance.
2. Max von Sydow in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close- Although he is in a very bad film, and must support an awful actor in the lead, Sydow's performance is the best part of the film creating a moving and mysterious portrait of a man who refuses to speak due to his past.
1. Kenneth Branagh in My Week With Marilyn- Branagh tops this weak year, although there were plenty of not nominated supporting performances. Interesting enough the order of the nominees is almost the reverse order of how I would rank the films the nominees, something that rarely happens I must say. Branagh stands as my choice with his good but not perfect impersonation of Laurence Olivier. What really gives him the win though is his ability to actually turn Olivier into a compelling character despite the sever limitations of the script, as well as have the potential problem of getting caught trying to make just an impression.
Deserving Performances:
Albert Brooks in Drive
Bryan Cranston in Drive
Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life

Tuesday, 14 February 2012

Best Supporting Actor 2011: Nick Nolte in Warrior

Nick Nolte received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Paddy Conlon in Warrior.

Warrior details a winner take all mixed martial art tournament whose two main combatants are estranged brothers (Tom Hardy, Joel Edgerton) fighting for their own difficult reasons.

Nolte is not an actor I can ever finding myself really liking. His performances usually can be functional but for me he is always lacking that extra quality that really brings you into his character making his performance into something special. Nick Nolte here portrays the formally drunken father of the two brothers, who has a strained relationship with both of them. I suppose his role sort of has Oscar all written over it, as well as seems to have Nolte all written over it as seems certainly cast correctly for the former drunk Paddy Conlon.

Nick Nolte certainly fits the haggard history of his character with his aged face, and his raspy voice that you can almost barely hear at times. Nolte though shows mostly a man who trying to be a reformed man, and is trying to get back what he lost in his bad years. This certainly could have been an extremely flashy role, but for the most part Nolte actually downplays his performance for the most part. He shows mostly his pain rather quietly, but in way to show that Paddy has in a way accepted what he has done.

A great deal of Paddy's character though is shown in his attempts to reconnect with his sons, which he never fully does throughout the course of the film. In scenes with both sons he is always at a distance in their scenes together. Nolte is good in these scenes but I am hard pressed to say he is amazing. He puts a great deal of effort into his performance, but as always with his performances his emotions are right but his performance never becomes as heartbreaking as it should be frankly.

Nolte simply never quite has the emotional impact one would want from a performance like this even in what should be the moving scenes such as when he wants to see his grand children. In this scene Nolte is good enough in that he realistic in his depiction of the scene, but it just never has the extra quality that would have made the scene something truly special. This is really how I felt about the performance as a whole, not bad, even good , but never special.

The film also throws in an Oscar scene unfortunately where Paddy gets drunk again after a troubling scene with his son. Firstly Nolte really did not show Paddy to be that upset after his talk with his son to cause him to have such a break down, secondly the break down seemed unneeded really in the end, and almost seemed to be there to let Nolte show off. Again Nolte isn't bad in this scene though, but it rather just satisfactory enough, but not more than that.

Nolte tries to be the heart of the film, and does give a great deal of effort in his attempt at this, but in the end it he just never comes alive to the extent I would want from a performance like this. It is an entirely descent performance from Nolte, he never has a bad scene or even really bad moment. His performance never really had an especially memorable scene or moment either though.

Saturday, 11 February 2012

Best Supporting Actor 2011

And the Nominees Are:

Max Von Sydow in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Kenneth Branagh in My Week With Marilyn

Christopher Plummer in Beginners

Jonah Hill in Moneyball

Nick Nolte in Warrior

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Best Actor 1998: Results

5. Robeto Benigni in Life is Beautiful- Well he certainly smiles a lot and clowns around but that is basically all he does.
4. Tom Hanks in Saving Private Ryan- Tom Hanks stays as a man to follow through the war epic of a film, and finds time to develop his character despite the nature of the film.
3.Ian McKellen in Gods and Monsters- McKellen gives a very effective, and believable performance as James Whale, suggesting all of his complicated past, and his current predicaments exceedingly well.
2. Edward Norton in American History X- Edward Norton is effective in portraying the intensity of his character's hatred but also the poignancy in his reformation. 
1. Nick Nolte in Affliction- Nick Nolte never gives an effective depiction of a stunted man falling off an edge. 

Sunday, 28 November 2010

Best Actor 1998: Nick Nolte in Affliction

Nick Nolte received his second Oscar nomination for portraying small town cop Wade Whitehouse in Affliction.

Re-watching the film again I had a greater appreciation for it, which I'll admit started to creep up on me long since I reviewed Nolte originally, though there are some slightly iffy moments in direction I'd say this has some of the best writing of Schrader's career even if in a way he explores less than it could.

Part of the choices are fundamental within the character of Wade Whitehouse, who I think is really a brilliant subversion of the rough and tumble type that Nick Nolte was often cast in, but here it is turned on its head. Perhaps I needed more exposure to Nolte's body of work to fully appreciate it, or perhaps for whatever reason I just wasn't able to see it at the time. Because Nolte's performance is as a fundamentally broken man that we slowly uncover that fact, while it being readily apparent right away, however within the sort of Nolte oeuvre of this era. Nolte's early scenes are potentially of the tough guy actor who might be onto something, the town is against him, his ex-wife is against him, he might have something to do about it, however none of that is really the case. Nolte's physical work here is remarkable in creating this alternative setting, helped by great costuming where he always seems to have clothing a few sizes too big, however Nolte's typical physical manner is as a man who doesn't at all know how to stand, how to move, how to do much of anything. Nolte isn't lumbering as a giant, rather he is lumbering as a klutz who can barely keep it together one way or another. His whole early scenes of attempting to act as a small town cop, or even trying to be a parent to his daughter, is of the same fumbling fool who can't stand up straight when speaking to anyone, rambles in his delivery to his daughter that is tries to be warm however fails to be so, and even as a cop his acts of trying to "uphold the law" are of the most tepid kind of spineless acts that barely even register. Even the toothache he begins with, Nolte's performance realistically brings that pestering pain as just another thing that sits on the man, and seems to make him far less than what he claims to be.

I think key to his performance is the potential for a better nature, that soon is used up within the narrative, however seems to have some chance by honestly Wade's best moments as a human early on with Sissy Spacek's Margie, where Nolte portrays not this manly man, or even charming lead, rather there seems to be any genuine tenderness in his interactions with her. Again Nolte subverts typical posturing to be really honestly quite meek in the moments of speaking to her with some real warmth, such as when he asks her to marry him as just an idea. Nolte's delivery of the scene brings Wade most unlike how we will see him in terms of being his father's son, because he not only seems to be genuine in his affection, Nolte's performance is without force, rather a wholly honest gentle ask that suggests there is some care within Wade, even if that will be quickly covered up by so many things as the film progresses. Or really regresses very quickly as Wade visits his tyrannical father Glenn (James Coburn), who we previously saw via flashbacks where we saw him a heavy drinker, an alcoholic and violent abuser of his children. Although the strangeness is perhaps, though perhaps painful reality, in this film it is merely part of the reality, the reality that becomes ever present when Wade becomes once again the realm of his father, due to his mom having died from Glenn's neglect that led to death from the cold of their home. An especially disturbing moment due to the way it plays out so matter factly, and we see Wade's discovery as this very subdued, yet potent reaction of resignation to see his mother having died by his father's lack of care.

Coinciding with the family tragedy is the red herring of the film, the Nick Nolte "vehicle" plot where a local hunting guide goes out with a wealthy visitor, the latter who is killed in a strange hunting accident leaving Wade a bit suspicious of the whole thing. Something that Nolte approaches in his performance however with certainty but not the certainty you'd expect from other hard boiled Nolte characters. Nolte's performance though has almost a humorous undercutting quality of the man playing detective as he makes a curious glance here or there whenever it seems like there is some tidbit of information he might be taking from it. Nolte's performance is key in that there is no great genius behind any of Wade's thinking, rather deep down it is something entirely different. We are allowed to play in the vehicle a bit more when Wade converses over the phone, and eventually in person, with his brother Rolfe (Willem Dafoe) who plays into Wade's ideas of the murder and uncovering an entire conspiracy within the town built around the murder. Something where Nolte's performance is inflamed with passion of figuring out this complex situation against Dafoe who seems to push every idea but in this passive way that encourages, but doesn't entirely involve himself. Wade's pursuit finding little other than freaking out his murder suspect to shoot Wade's vehicle, but even Nolte's reaction to that isn't of some eureka but this simplistic befuddlement. Because all of this paranoia nonsense, where such certainties are lacking in Nolte's performance, not against the performance, but rather illustrative of the man going off on completely nonsensical connections of a man seeking purpose out of anything, even deranged conspiracy.

The third act of the film is both that has some of the best moments, but the whole thing seems like too much of a running train to get to the end of things, that is a little surprising as every mistake Wade makes pile on each other, seemingly the catalyst by the introduction of his dad back into his home life and the death of his mother. I would say I think all maybe could've been told in this time, just it isn't paced perfectly as either scripted or edited, regardless Nolte's performance I think most manages to embody the growing tension. Part of that as we see the man's mistake just adds up and Nolte's performance I think works because of the shoddy sort of foolishness of the way he portrays Wade's more brutish actions that scare away all the women in his life, and he seems to represent his father. What I think Nolte does so well by portraying this is because he doesn't show Wade suddenly becoming his dad, rather he shows the man basically replicating the behavior truly learned, but not understood. A strange idea perhaps, but rather what Nolte's performance does is have the moment of the man in conflict with himself, however the fundamental choice is that Nolte portrays this all as a man who isn't aware of that. When we see him lash out randomly at a bar tender, or even at Margie and his daughter he plays this quick instinctual reaction to distress wholly learned, because after each time Nolte looks at it with not quite demented, but very much a man lost in himself as he realizes what he's done not as shame but more of "oh, what'd I do". Nolte presenting a man completely lost in state of inadequacy symbolized in part by the man broken by himself, in this case symbolized, but also literalized by his infected tooth driving him insane to the point he rips it out with pliers, which is great visceral acting by Nolte in making you feel every bit of that pain in the scene. But that isn't the cause of it all, the cause of it is Glenn, and the adult reactions between Wade and Glenn are key to understanding Wade's broken state. The first being his protective outrage when Glenn gets pushy at the funeral, where it is fascinating to see Nolte, common as the tough guy, bring the rage, yet seem so weak in his physical grappling, and Nolte manages to convey the stunted boy in these moments in the way you see the fear in his eyes even as he's tackling an old man. Their final confrontation in particular is brilliant work from Nolte, and what might seem one of the most nonsensical choices, I think is one of his most incredible, when he accidentally kills Glenn in their final fight. Nolte's playful way of pointing the gun at him, with this grin on his face like it is all a game, might seem insane, but rather speaks to the state of Wade as this child forever still in that infantile state by the abuse of his father. It is this strange father/son game even in the fight, and he reacts as though it is all part of that relationship even when it results in this death as Nolte shows the man completely lost within this state of delusion. Which gives logic to his final action of killing the man he's come to believe is a murderer, with this satisfied grin, of a man completely gone mentally, having fully become lost in the delusions so easily created from his traumatic life. 

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

Best Actor 1998

And the Nominees Were:

Ian McKellen in Gods and Monsters

Tom Hanks in Saving Private Ryan

Roberto Benigni in Life is Beautiful

Edward Norton in American History X

Nick Nolte in Affliction

Who do you predict, and pick?

Sunday, 31 October 2010

Best Actor 1991: Results

5. Warren Beatty in Bugsy- Simply a bad performance which fails at its core. He never finds the right tone for Bugsy, and never seems to be authentic, and many times comes off unintentionally funny in his worst scenes.
4. Nick Nolte in The Prince of Tides- Nolte has a few scenes where he is okay, they are his quiet confession scenes, but everything else he does either comes off as completely false or just weird. He always plays his character artificially and never really gets down to the heart of him.
3. Robert De Niro in Cape Fear. De Niro has some good scenes early on despite his terrible accent, but as the film goes on he simply hams it up way too much.
2. Robin Williams in The Fisher King- Robin Williams at first over plays the role, and cannot stay in character, but as he goes on he gets a bit better in the crazy scenes, and he actually is fairly effective in his quiet scenes.
1. Anthony Hopkins in The Silence of the Lambs- This ought to be a surprise to no one, but Hopkins by far gave the best lead actor performance nominated this year and he can even be argued as not a lead. Still Hopkins is brilliant in every minute of his relatively short performance. He creates a fascinating, memorable, and truly effective character from Hannibal Lecter. Every scene he handles with perfection, never going over the top, or even seeming calculated since all of his motions are brilliant.
Deserving Performances:
John Turturro in Barton Fink

Friday, 29 October 2010

Best Actor 1991: Nick Nolte in The Prince of Tides

Nick Nolte received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Wingo in The Prince of Tides.

The Prince of Tides as a movie is.... wait I erased it from my memory, I'll watch one more time, I'll be right back.......................the horror, the horror.

Anyways Nick Nolte is an actor I will admit, is not a favorite of mine. I just not seen a performance of his that really is all that amazing. It is strange to me that he was a leading man, because he seems to especially have problems with these, and seems like an actor who seems like he would be better as a character actor than a lead actor.

Nolte plays Tom Wingo one of the three children of a very troubled family. He has all sorts of repressed memories from his childhood that leads to troubles in with his own immediate family. Nolte's early indications of the character are just odd, and seem very unnatural. He tries to show Tom as a guy who seems a little off kilter, and has repression, but Nolte failed to do either of these things very well. His mannerisms to show his off kilter problems are weird smiles and such which do not really seem to be correct, and he really he let the movie explain around him that he had repression issues, opposed to Nolte actually showing them in his acting.

Nolte shares many scenes with Barbra Streisand who plays his suicidal sister's and eventually his psychiatrist called Lowenstein. He shares many scenes with Streisand, they are either the dramatic scenes or the romantic scenes together. In the dramatic scenes Nolte offers a very mixed bag of emotions. Many of his scenes where he yells all the time do not really work that well I mean he certainly yells a lot but he does not do all much more than yelling, he plainly adds no substance to his yelling. It just never adds up to emotionally effective scenes, because Nolte simply never seems that distressed about what he is yelling which includes frustrations of his own childhood, and his sisters attempted suicide.  He never seems to be that honestly troubled, keeping Wingo as only really a character as only really emotionally troubled on the surface, and seems fairly artificial.

He does have a few scenes that are better when he quiets down a little bit. I will give him a little credit, his quiet confessions are fairly well done, even if not amazing. His final big confession Nolte does do a fine job with it, but it certainly is wasted since in this movie a person instantly gets over their emotional troubles from talking about them only once, therefore any authenticity from Nolte's confession is automatically wasted. This confession leads to the terrible romantic moments with Streisand. These moments are strange, and absolutely false. Their chemistry is bizarre, and makes little sense, since the relationship makes so little sense. They do not do anything with it and their scenes together are rather cringeworthy at times. He also shares a few scenes with Streisand's real son who plays Lowenstein's son, these scenes are unbearably cheesy, but go along well with the terrible film, and I guess Nolte needed terrible scenes with two generations of Striesands. His overall performance has a few scenes with something to it, but overall he lacks conviction and has some extra bad scenes to make things even worse.

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Best Actor 1991

And the Nominees Were:

Robert De Niro in Cape Fear

Warren Beatty in Bugsy

Anthony Hopkins in The Silence of the Lambs

Robin Williams in The Fisher King

Nick Nolte in The Prince of Tides

Here is the special Halloween edition of Best Actor, since there is not anything scarier than Bugsy, The Fisher King, and the Prince of Tides.