Showing posts with label John Cusack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Cusack. Show all posts

Friday, 29 April 2022

Alternate Best Actor 1997: Results

5. Sam Lee in Made in Hong Kong - Lee gives an off-beat yet often poignant portrayal of a wannabe gangster.

Best Scene: Failing to be a gangster.
4. Takeshi Kitano in Hana-bi - Kitano gives a very specific yet potent performance that artful stoicism mixed in with punctuations of violence, sadness and love.

Best Scene: In the car with his wife.
3. John Cusack in Grosse Pointe Blank - Cusack gives a terrific subversion and execution of his typical rom com lead by being charming yet psychopathic all the same.

Best Scene: Breakfast.
2. Stellan Skarsgård in Insomnia - Skarsgård gives an uncompromising portrayal of a man who goes to the most vile extremes to do "good".

Best Scene: Seeing the cat.
1. Ray Winstone - Nil By Mouth - Winstone gives a bluntly brutal portrayal of visceral intensity, yet is also quietly heartbreaking as a man whose violence is defined by his painful vulnerability.
 
Best Scene: Nil by mouth. 
 
Next: 1997 Supporting

Thursday, 28 April 2022

Alternate Best Actor 1997: John Cusack in Grosse Pointe Blank

John Cusack did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Martin Q. Blank in Grosse Pointe Blank. 

Grosse Pointe Blank is an entertaining comedy about a hit-man returning to his hometown for a high school reunion. Interestingly also features 2 of the eventual Oscar nominees for supporting actress delivering superior performances than their Oscar nominated turns. 

Once again returning to John Cusack for the fourth review in a short amount of time, after successfully avoiding Cusack reviews for the longest time, we once again return to where perhaps Cusack is most at home, by in a way changing up the expectations a bit. Cusack made his name in teen romantic comedies in the late 1980s, and this film is essentially a basic subversion of that. One side of it is that it takes place ten years after his time in high school, the central set-piece being Martin's high school reunion, the other being that he's also a hitman, dealing with a jealous and controlling hitman Grocer (Dan Aykroyd) wanting to set-up a hitman union while also attempting to deal with somewhat more expected ideas of returning to one's high school. In turn, this performance from Cusack is both the expected Cusack performance and not the expected Cusack performance and combined that really is the beauty of this performance. 

On one hand, you do get Cusack being the sort of fresh-faced, slightly less of a youngster this time around, whose certain charm is kind of based on the fact that he's not quite sure of his charm in a way. Cusack delivers that once again here, but again the comedy of this comes in the form that we have an alternative knowledge about his character as a psychopathic hitman whom we know from the opening scene where he carries out a somewhat bungled job involving multiple hit-men. It is a wonderful combination because Cusack manages to play Martin both as a hitman, and not as a hitman, it is that grey area I think that defines so much of the comedy of the film, which is rather winning in its own way. Cusack establishes this in the early scenes where he speaks to his assistant (Joan Cusack) or his scared psychiatrist (Alan Arkin), about his "job". Cusack's particular casual indifference about it is where the comedy is, as his fixation in terms of concern is far more on the fear of the prospect of his high school reunion than his series of murders.
 
The comedic value of Cusack's performance comes very much from the consistency of his turn here in portraying that sort of blithe indifference about the man's murders, even going so far as to bluntly tell all his old school friends that he was in fact a hitman without hesitation, all of them taking it as a joke initially. The clearest break from this actually being in his hilarious scenes with Aykroyd where in a way you could say Martin is most himself in plying his trade with a fellow craftsman in their moments of mutual hatred for one another. The random, and even kind of goofy, intensity Cusack and Aykroyd share together is rather fantastic. This is particularly well shown in a breakfast diner confrontation where both rush through their lines in such a great way as basically every line being this barb at one another, while their eyes providing the dagger. Again the juxtaposition being the great bits of comedy as the two exist in a seemingly normal reality, while both being focused on their act of killing. I especially love Cusack's extreme way of arguing with the waitress as he tries to run through his order including an empty omelette with his forcefulness of just saying he "wants the protein" to try to end the conversation as soon as possible. 
 
There is more going though as we find in the central romance with Minnie Driver's Debi, whom Martin left cold prom night. Cusack and Driver's chemistry is pretty great here in just this off-beat nature of it. As it is eccentric, charged, but also traditionally sweet. They capture instantly this old fashioned connection but doing so in an oddball way as again Cusack always portraying Martin as psychopathic to an extent even in the way he navigates this relationship with this kind of interesting distance, that makes his sort of verbalization of his feelings towards the end of it actually feel natural because that is how Martin would approach it. Cusack though is fantastic throughout the man seeing his old life as he has great moments of comedy, love particularly his creepy way of hanging out with an old friend who is a real estate agent by saying he would like a "wife" just like the one a potential customer has in a perfectly oddly creepy way. He also though does have moments of theoretical pathos such as going to see his dad's grave or visit his mom in a mental ward. Cusack's actually great by not putting too much on it, rather showing Martin's sense of it in a very Martin way. Cusack's performance is winning here because he actually so well defines his character within the idea of the hitman always being the hitman, even in the moments of theoretical humanity. He never becomes a good guy, he rather states his change of heart in the way a psychopath would, which in a way makes it an atypical comedy, but one that works. Cusack's performance in turn is an atypical romantic lead, but one that works because his performance matches and in many ways creates the film's off-beat energy just as it should. He is a proper psychopath, but one you do end up liking whether he's murdering another hitman, or finding what seems like true love for himself.

Sunday, 20 March 2022

Alternate Best Actor 1997

And the Nominees Were Not:

Ray Winstone in Nil By Mouth
 
Takeshi Kitano in Hana-bi
 
Sam Lee in Made In Hong Kong 

John Cusack in Grosse Pointe Blank 
 
Stellan Skarsgård in Insomnia
And Reviews of:

Mark Wahlberg in Boogie Nights
 
Tony Leung Chiu-wai  in Happy Together

Tuesday, 5 October 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2000: Results

4. Denis Lavant in Beau Travail - Although limited by the film's perspective, Lavant still makes strong use of his unique physicality as a performer.

Best Scene: Final dance
3. John Cusack in High Fidelity - Cusack gives kind of the final sendoff of his romantic leading side, in a wholly winning turn.

Best Scene: A bit of maturity.
2. Sol Kyung-gu in Peppermint Candy - Although the impact of his work is limited by the film's repetitive nature, Sol makes a strong impact of a man slowly losing himself in reverse.

Best Scene: Opening
1. Lee Byung-hun in Joint Security Area - Although a powerful volcanic turn as per usual from Lee, but also a surprisingly heartwarming one as well.
 
Best Scene: Recounting the truth. 

Next: 2000 Supporting

Thursday, 23 September 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2000: John Cusack in High Fidelity

John Cusack did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Rob Gordon in High Fidelity. 

High Fidelity is a rather enjoyable romantic comedy about a sad sack record store owner recounting his top five breakups. 

High Fidelity marks kind of the last hurrah for John Cusack as a romantic comedy lead, after having made his bones basically through the genre, despite attempts to branch out to the more dramatic lead, which has had mixed results throughout his career. This though is basically Cusack within his bread and better, though slightly different from the young man looking for love in Better Off Dead and Say Anything, and now a less than middle age, though no longer a young man, dealing with the baggage of his relationships. Now I've always actually liked Cusack fairly well in these kinds of roles. This as he delivers on this sort of strange every man kind of charm. This as he's only kind of charming, he's more so hapless and kind of pathetic. We get that again here, but as an older man, slightly. The weird thing here is, that I think Cusack's performance is particularly essential here to the success of the film, but in a way it is a performance that is based on a kind of consistency. The consistency being that of not quite seriousness nor quite comedic in a way. Cusack is kind of this exact in-between mostly working within these kind of there between always with that state of a kind of sad sackness. And in this sense, his performance is wholly successful as I think a too earnest performance would've lost the sort of comic tone within the material, while a too comedic one would've felt too detached within the romance. Cusack some how sits between both in just the way needed for Rob.

This as Cusack portrays Rob in each of his "Top five" breakups in a very similar way, but in that similar way that works in creating the state of this perpetual kind of discontent, while also seeming pathetic, yet there is something remotely charming about him in that manner of his. This though as it is also fashioned through this recollections that Cusack presents as this ongoing narration/fourth wall break, with a lightweight annoyance that is funny, but also suggests the sense of memory of pain eased by reflection in a way. This isn't to say that Cusack is one note, because he isn't, it is rather this wavering note, that stays within a certain key signature I suppose, I mean might as well be musically inclined due to the nature of the film. Cusack though has these moments of passion, most passion is reserved for the little outbursts about music where his delivery is particularly direct and sure of himself. This against speaking of his romantic situations where that is downer, but in a way that wholly works from making the film feel like a downer or self-loathing. Really I can see this character being such a failure given the amount of self-loathing in there, but Cusack doesn't artfully so that makes it a joke, while making it feel honest, while also not piling it on too thickly. He's just right in a way, and through that I find this one of Cusack's most endearing performances honestly. 

Again there are variations within his performance as Cusack is hilarious in these switches, particularly the outbursts of anger when at his lowest points of relationships, which Cusack heightens just enough to be both funny while also not making the character too cruel seeming in these moments. Now in the relationships we get Cusack in a way making his chemistry work to the degree it needs to, though in a way by being this man of insecurities more constantly than not. Cusack though just has that enough of an endearing energy, whether the relationship is based only insecurity, a mutual desperation, or something potentially more genuine. The latter being the focal relationship with his most recent breakup in Laura (Iben Hjejle). The two do share a particularly sweet chemistry even though it is in a way in between lines, in a moment of a glance or reflection, which Cusack really so fluidly realizes here. This in that he never exactly shows Rob completely move out of that state of his, yet has these better moments, must as he has his worse moments of frustration. It wonderful rhythm that Cusack achieves and manages to pull off to create the investment in the relationship, as much as Rob consistently makes bad decisions and acts like a real jerk in so many ways. Cusack is what makes the film work actually because he makes Rob work as a character, who should really be an insufferable lead in most hands. Cusack hits that balance, and here I think gives the very best example of Cusack in the form that made him a star in the first place, even if it was for one of the last times.

Monday, 6 September 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2000

And the Nominees Were Not:

John Cusack in High Fidelity
 
Denis Lavant in Beau Travail
 
Sol Kyung-gu in Peppermint Candy
 
Lee Byung-hun in Joint Security Area
 
Sean Connery in Finding Forrester

Monday, 28 June 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2015: Paul Dano and John Cusack in Love & Mercy

Paul Dano did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying young Brian Wilson and John Cusack did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying old Brian Wilson in Love & Mercy. 

Love & Mercy is an effective biopic that follows Brian Wilson during two different tumultuous times in his life. 
 

Watching the film again only reaffirmed my affection for this film, particularly for its off-beat choice in its biopic design. This as the two sides of the man are not segmented into the up and comer, and the old man reflecting, it is something very different here in terms of the way the two timelines play off one another. A reason for this is the central casting of John Cusack and Paul Dano, who are two very different actors, who don't necessarily look all that much like each other and don't look that much like Brian Wilson either. I love this decision actually, one being it separates the design of the film as truly two stories, with two men, as the one man in very different places in life, this accepting of this separation all the easier due to the two actors playing the part. One being John Cusack, a well known actor, and even better known in terms of his type as that charming yet not quiet fully confident type. All that's thrown out here in Cusack probably giving one of his least John Cusack style performances. This as we see in the introduction to old Brian as he is looking for a car with a warm saleswoman Melinda (Elizabeth Banks), while being loomed over by Brian's "bodyguard". Cusack's performance is that of a guy who has been through some kind of hell, and really his only communication now is through almost a kind of whisper. What I love about what Cusack is doing is as affected as his speech is here, that speaks towards Brian's state after years of substance abuse "cured" by psychological abuse, is how genuine he feels in his attitude of this beaten though kind spirit in Brian. It's there as he speaks to why his shoes are off, why he has his bodyguard and even in his brother's death. Cusack brings this meek but wonderful sense of a man trying to reach out in the smallest of ways. 

This seemingly broken man though was supposedly in his prime as we find the young Brian played by Paul Dano, an actor who is one of the more interesting performer in his age group if in part from his willingness to basically just go for it. Dano in his second scene shows a very different Brian, but a Brian who is going through another kind of hell. And again I love the separation it creates by us seeing this man who is on his way towards the other man, but has far to go. This as we see in his breakdown upon a plane, Dano's performance delivers its own anguish but this is raw and extremely painful. Dano effectively going into the full throws of the anxiety of the moment. A moment though as we follow Brian in a very different setting, and I'll just bluntly say that Dano is brilliant here. This in creating a very different idiosyncratic man from Cusack, that feels similar in his particular style of not one's traditional notions of "normal", however here it will strike one a bit differently. Dano captures this very particular state that you can either accept as a man an eccentric genius or a man on the verge of a breakdown...while it's really both. Dano though is great in the enthusiasm he speaks, as he convinces the rest of the band to let him stop touring and just write, is wholly genuine and you see that spark of inspiration in his eyes that is so palatable. At the same time the sort of need within that spark Dano makes almost too intense, however in that built up intensity there is a sense of the man's pain that he himself doesn't know what to make of. 

The film jumps back and forth between the times at will, quite artfully I'd say, each one though showing a different side of Brian though each in a way getting to who he is. Cusack, I suppose fittingly, has the romantic side, though this is no John Cusack romcom performance. There still is something wholly charming and sweet about him here in his lovely chemistry with Elizabeth Banks, who is also wonderful. This as Cusack plays almost the moments between them initially as these little moments of happiness and of a guy just connecting best he can. This as his posture is so defeated as a man, and just is there practically like a beaten animal as he is watched over by his "doctor" Eugene Landy (Paul Giamatti). Cusack's brief moments are so beautifully modest though in the brief indications of tenderness towards her, and gives the sense of a man just so timidly attempting to be happy with something while still being wholly fearful of what is around him. Dano also depicts a man in love though with his young Brian it is being in love with music. Something I love about Love and Mercy, that most musical biopics fail miserably in, is showing the creative process and really the sense of working for true inspiration. This as Dano expresses this value in this act so richly in every moment of creativity. There is an essential moment of performance against the reaction of Brian's father. Dano is heartbreaking in portraying Brian's attempt to describe the song for his father, this as he brings so much excitement in trying describe it, while also showing such a need for approval in his pitch. This making Brian's father's cruel tone all the more painful, as Dano expresses just how much this type of disregard for his art cuts so deep.
 
 Of course not every moment is thankfully always traumatic and my absolute favorite scenes of the film, is when we see Brian exploring his music in a recording session. Dano is fantastic in the scene because of just how alive he is in the sequence. This as his eyes bring that real sense of drive in every moment of examining each instrument, event piece of his song, they are piercing in showing a man striving for a kind of perfection. He balances that though with the sheer sense of fun he brings to playing around with the different musicians and explaining his ideas. Dano shows a man in this moment living his best life in the creative process that is a combination of drive, but also just love of the process. Honestly I could've watched a whole film of just Dano playing around in the studio as he brings so much life to it. The closest comparison I can make is Tom Hulce as Mozart in Amadeus, where both actors are able to make the creative process not some intangible thing, but rather wholly vivid in terms of the sense of the particular rhythm for it, however also through finding the joy in it. What Dano does with this though in a way though is make it in itself something borderline. This as Dano's expression dances between one of sheer jubilation and also nearly a demented state. This as Dano emphasizing how much of just one's man kind of personal will placing himself into this act, and crafting the state of a man who is both intends to make something truly great, while also personally falling apart. 

Where there is the unmistakable connection between both performances is that Brian in a way is a man unto himself in terms of personality. This as even his way of dealing with the world is wholly different from the average person, and in each phase though Cusack and Dano depict this a little disparately. Dano's work is more expressive in this regard as his very energy in a given scene is something special in itself. This as just as he moves around, or even just as he can't quite sit in a seat. The way he looks around and interacts with his space, Dano creates a sense of the man in a way seemingly deciphering the world in his own unusual fashion. He never looks or responds quite the expected way, but entirely does so in the way that feels true to his Brian. Now Cusack is far more subdued within the portrayal of this trait, though it is still evident in his performance. Fittingly though it is of a man who has had much of his life stripped out of him. That specific energy though is still found, even so modestly, in his moments of interaction with Banks, particularly a moment of expressing his love for her via a brief song, that is completely idiosyncratic in a romantic gesture, which Cusack in turn portrays in a wholly idiosyncratic way. Cusack seemingly almost lost in the words, not quite listless though, as there is a purity of the tenderness within it all of again, the man who simply has his own way of interacting within the world. 

The film follows then really on the descent of Brian towards his darkest chapter with Dano while we see the man returning to a semblance of normality through his relationship with Melinda. Cusack's work is one that is built upon that chemistry with Banks that really succeeds. This just in Banks bringing such an abundance of warmth, against Cusack';s moving portrayal of the slow return towards any sense of a mutual affection with anyone. Their final scene I found absolutely heartwarming as it earns the moment of the man returning to himself and showing it to Melinda, and Cusack does this just by being a little more outgoing, still Brian, but now with finally a comfort and pride in himself. Dano on the other-hand powerfully depicts the man falling towards a painful time. This in the moments of overt horror as Brian suffers from horrific audio hallucinations, which Dano grants the right visceral intensity to show just how crippling these are. In this though Dano depicts a man already on edge for a multitude of reasons falling apart all the more. Dano's terrific in showing the different pulls within the man that are essentially tearing him apart, from his strained relationship with his father, his struggles with his artistic endeavors, drugs and just seemingly losing his connection with reality. Dano's performance vividly conveys each factor. This as there is the physical distress, but there is also the emotional. Emotional both of the man just trying to get his vision out there and often facing dismissal, and that of a defeated son looking and failing to see genuine love from his jealous father. And in this we see the connection between Cusack and Dano. This as Dano's descent gives up to Cusack's quiet rise. This of a man taking all of the world in and suffering for it, against a man closed off from all of it, suffering all the same. The two almost wholly separately creating their own portrait of Brian Wilson however mutually making captivating depictions of one soul.
(For Cusack)

(For Dano)

Wednesday, 1 July 2020

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2014: Results

10. John Cusack in Map to the Stars - Cusack might actually play his part too low key as he isn't able to overcome the weaknesses of his film.

Best Scene: Reaction to the fire.
9. Sam Claflin in Riot Club - Claflin is properly despicable but not much more than that.

Best Scene: Club at its worst.
8. Chris Pine Stretch in Pine is a whole lot of something, not quite sure what, but it is definitely something worth seeing.

Best Scene: Ending.

7. Irrfan Khan in Haider - Khan brings the right haunting quality and delivers the right impact in his brief screentime.

Best Scene: What happened.

6. Ricardo Darin in Wild Tales - Darin depicts an appropriate mental descent from dealing with the insanity of bureaucracy.

Best Scene: Losing it.

5. Taika Waititi in What We Do in the Shadows - Waititi gives an amusing performance by always being just so genteel as his vampire.

Best Scene: Wearing the pendant.
4. Michael Parks in Tusk - Parks is a far greater than his terrible film in his properly deranged turn as a walrus aficionado. 

Best Scene: Doesn't need a wheelchair.

3. Damián Alcázar in The Perfect Dictatorship - He manages to be both hilarious and menacing as a politician who in no way hides the shame of his corruption.

Best Scene: Threatening "suicide".

2. Matthias Schoenaerts in The Drop - Schoenaerts gives a terrific portrayal of a wannabe threat in more ways than one.

Best Scene: "I killed Richie Wheeling"
1. Shia LaBeouf in Fury - Good predictions Anonymous, Robert, Tim, Maciej, and Emi Grant.  LaBeouf delivers a performance worthy of a great war film. He's in Fury, but nonetheless LaBeouf gives it his all as a man scarred by war.

Best Scene: "Send me"
Updated Overall

Next: 1966 lead.

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2014: John Cusack in Maps to the Stars

John Cusack did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Stafford Weiss in Maps to the Stars.

Maps to the Stars is a bad David Cronenberg movie that wishes to be an abrasive satire about Hollywood. One is better off just re-watching Mulholland Drive instead, what a great film.

Anyways watching this bad (mostly, I do like Robert Pattinson and Mia Wasikowska in it) David Cronenberg film it got me wondering why do some of his films work so well, and some don't work at all. This definitely falls into the latter category, but I had to examine why. I think arrived to the why pretty easily though. Great to good Cronenberg is when he's making films about real people in strange situations, his bad films are just about strange people. Obviously a man turning into a Fly isn't realistic, but Cronenberg cares about Seth Brundle in that film, and part of the greatness of that film lies within that approach. The only argument against my thesis here may be Dead Ringers, however I'd argue as strange as the Mantle twins are, the emotions they're going through, the way their going through them is depicted with an honest humanity. When he lets his characters be strange entirely his films tend to fall off the rails. Anyways Maps is perpetuated largely with extreme Hollywood types, in which Cronenberg seems to hold very little sympathy, and in turn the film almost seems to become a zoological exercise "look how weird and shallow they are". Speaking of we have John Cusack as Stafford Weiss a Hollywood self-help guru.

I suppose this isn't quite the ideal review to first start with John Cusack, better known as a young leading man of the 80's and 90's, who, much like the academy, I've yet to encounter in all this time of my endeavor here, until now. I say it's not quite ideal as this isn't within his more typical wheelhouse in the strange world of Cronenberg's creatures. Cusack I'm not sure is ideal for this role either off the outset in that he doesn't really have the "look" or presence of the life style guru type. Cusack's vibe is typically more casual even down to earth, so theoretically Cusack should be working against that. We see him early on as he's treating Julianne Moore's neurotic Havana Segrand, and honestly, in a weird way, Cusack's probably the role where going a little broader probably could've been warranted, however he doesn't take this approach. Cusack sort of plays it as this soft speaker of reassurances to his client. These spoken with a thin sincerity in enough for the client yet Cusack grants no real passion within himself as he speaks the words to her. He does his job though in the most limited possible way. There's more to Weiss as he's also the father to a young child star Benjie (Evan Bird). We have a scene where he speaks to his son as sort of an interrogation put forth as a father son heart to heart. Cusack brings the same sort of emphasis on the lack of sincerity though there is a sense of a minor concern within his eyes, not really so much for his son rather his position. Complications ensue more when his daughter Agatha (Mia Wasikowska), who formerly started a fire that endangered the family, comes back to town from a mental institution. Cusack's scene with Wasikowska, has I think potential, but it doesn't quite work. Again, strangely enough, I think Cusack downplays it too much, this in the scene is kind of Stafford being the guru and "loving father"while threatening his daughter to make her go away. Cusack I suppose at least gets this across, but his rather just cold way of playing it makes it a tepid scene. Although again this may be a problem with Cronenberg in general who struggles with comedy, and in turn his actors often do too, unless you're William Hurt...oddly enough. Cusack's scenes honestly just don't work in general, he's just part of that clock that's broken. Cusack eventually breaks that zen state, although even then his zen state wasn't that refined so the break doesn't have that much impact, when he starts yelling about the state of disrepair of his family. Frankly his best scene is at the very end of the film just for the decently realistic reaction to seeing someone on fire (in a scene that otherwise has to be one of the most atrocious scenes from a filmmaker capable of greatness that I've seen due to CGI fire that needs to be seen to be believed). Cusack isn't the worst part of this film, but he doesn't overcome its weaknesses in the least. He's not ideally cast, he doesn't overcome that, and this is just a largely unsuccessful performance from him.

Saturday, 20 June 2020

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2014

And The Nominees Were Not:

Chris Pine in Stretch

Matthias Schoenaerts in The Drop

Irrfan Khan in Haider

Taika Waititi in What We Do in the Shadows

Ricardo Darin in Wild Tales 

Predict those five, these five or both:

Sam Claflin in The Riot Club

Shia LaBeouf in Fury

Michael Parks in Tusk (Do not Watch)

John Cusack in Maps to the Stars

Damian Alcazar in The Perfect Dictatorship