James Gandolfini did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Carol in Where the Wild Things Are.
Where the Wild Things Are, follows a precocious kid Max (Max Records) as he runs away from home to the titular place.
The titular place is filled with large creatures, however, the large creatures act more like children than large creatures or adults, though they are voiced by adults. The main creature played by James Gandolfini who was most famous for playing the very mature content related to Tony Soprano, and honestly, I wouldn't say this is hidden, as Gandolfini's vocal performance is closer to Tony Soprano than his actual voice, which is a bit fitting because in some ways Tony was nothing but an emotional infant. So really this casting makes perfect sense, even if it might be odd on paper, and it might seem odder in execution, though it is quite brilliant. And what makes it all work is Gandolfini's performance, which, much like his work as Tony Soprano oddly enough, makes a fairly despicable character likable. And one has to kind of wonder why. And yes Gandolfini is a charismatic performer, and I guess the incredible part here shows that his charisma comes through even when just being a voice within a "wild thing". And Gandolfini plays the most childish of the Wild Things, and as Carol, Gandolfini is wonderfully childish, to say the least. You just instantly understand this fact, and is also strangely disarming immediately, despite his character going around destroying things when we first meet him. And what is going with him is kind of this perfect depiction of petulance, in a way that is very bizarrely endearing, if you'd probably hate having to interact with a Carol in real life. Gandolfini though brings anger into his voice, but that anger is just always mixed with a child's vulnerability, even though he doesn't hide the age in an obvious way, he captures the spirit of a child's emotion so tangibly. And there is something special about the way Gandolfini so naturally flows and there is a beautiful purity in the moments where he is speaking the excitement of Carol as Max brings new games. He's just as honest though in his meek shyness when he tries to encourage another of the wild things, who he clearly likes, to stick around. Gandolfini is great because he's everything a child can be in terms of emotion, in that it can be very sweet, very endearing, very moving, but also in a way dangerous if not entirely caustic. Gandolfini though is all of these things, so naturally, and in such a way that you just understand him. He's great in the big expressions, but the quiet ones such as wanting a place where only what you what to happen happens, Gandolfini's performance captures this poignant sense of the comfort anyone may seek, however, especially a child. Gandolfini is great in making the way Carol is all over the place, which includes loving Max one second and then wanting to eat him the next, wholly logical in this way of a child's logic. It is genuinely a moving performance because Gandolfini never winks once, never once seems to say "Hey look I'm Tony Soprano in a kid's movie", he rather seeks to truly articulate all the vulnerabilities, all the difficulties of a child who can control their emotions, in a way that grants a real empathy to what is really in so many ways a mess of irrational thought. Gandolfini's work I think more than any other aspect of the film, realizes its specific ideas of truly exploring a kid's logic in a way that dances around absurdities, but also remains very true and almost covertly heartfelt. And while at the time, Gandolfini wouldn't have been the first person you'd expect in this film, he made himself essential to the film, and showed yet another aspect of his considerable talent that we saw all too briefly.














