Showing posts with label Basil Rathbone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Basil Rathbone. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 March 2016

Alternate Best Actor 1939: Results

5. Henry Fonda in Young Mr. Lincoln - Fonda gives an atypical performance as Lincoln, but an effective one finding the right charisma within an unassuming personality.

Best Scene: Lincoln stops a Lynching.
4. Conrad Veidt in The Spy in Black - Veidt effectively humanizes his character making his German spy far more than just a villain who needs to be stopped.

Best Scene: The ending. 
3. Basil Rathbone in The Hound of Baskervilles - Rathbone earns his place as the most iconic Sherlock Holmes by giving a well rounded portrayal of the character. As he delivers the right command in the role, but also finds a certain humor which never undercuts the gravity of the situation.

Best Scene: Holmes's introduction
2. James Cagney in The Roaring Twenties - As per usual Cagney gives a strong portrait of an intimidating gangster, but also as per usual he ends up being surprisingly moving as well.

Best Scene: Eddie's final confrontation with George. 
1. Charles Laughton in The Hunchback of Notre Dame - Laughton gives a downright brilliant performance capturing the physicality needed for Quasimodo, and the emotional core of the character in heartbreaking detail.

Best Scene: "why was i not made of stone like thee"
Overall Ranking:
  1. Charles Laughton in The Hunchback of Notre Dame
  2. Clark Gable in Gone With The Wind
  3. James Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
  4. Laurence Olivier in Wuthering Heights
  5. Robert Donat in Goodbye, Mr. Chips
  6. James Cagney in The Roaring Twenties
  7. Basil Rathbone in The Hound of Baskervilles
  8. Conrad Veidt in The Spy in Black
  9. William Powell in Another Thin Man 
  10. John Wayne in Stagecoach
  11. Cary Grant in Only Angels Have Wings 
  12. Basil Rathbone in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
  13. Henry Fonda in Young Mr. Lincoln
  14. Edmond O'Brien in The Hunchback of Notre Dame 
  15. William Holden in Golden Boy
  16. Stan Laurel in The Flying Deuces
  17. Oliver Hardy in The Flying Deuces
  18. Brian Aherne in Juarez
  19. Gary Cooper in Beau Geste
  20. Ray Milland in Beau Geste 
  21. John Clements in The Four Feathers
  22. Melvyn Douglas in Ninotchka
  23. Victor McLaglen in Gunga Din
  24. Nigel Bruce in The Hound of Baskervilles 
  25. Paul Muni in Juarez 
  26. Cary Grant in Gunga Din
  27. George Brent in Dark Victory
  28. Charles Boyer in Love Affair
  29. Henry Fonda in Drums Along the Mohawk
  30. Mickey Rooney in Babes in Arms
  31. Tyrone Power in Jesse James
  32. Robert Kent in Convict's Code
Next Year: 1939 Supporting

Alternate Best Actor 1939: Basil Rathbone in The Hound of Baskervilles

Basil Rathbone did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sherlock Holmes in The Hound of Baskervilles.

The Hound of Baskervilles is a fine version of the story about Sherlock Holmes investigating the mystery involving a possibly mythical creature.

The Hound of Baskervilles marks the first of a total of fourteen films with Rathbone playing the most famous detective of literature. Rathbone certainly is the most prolific performer as Holmes, at least in terms of cinematic output, and I would say is definitely the most iconic depiction of the character. When the standard image of Holmes is thought of it is probably of Rathbone in the deerstalker. What of his actual performance as the detective though? I must admit I don't find Basil Rathbone to be the most consistent performer. When he goes over the top he's a rather bad ham, and there are times were he can be quite bland as well. Thankfully one would not notice this is they only ever viewed his performances as Holmes. The interesting thing though is that the story of the Hound of the Baskervilles features Holmes in a rather limited quantity, with Doctor Watson (Nigel Bruce) receiving more screen time given that he arrives on the foggy moor to investigate at a much earlier time than Sherlock Holmes. Once again though thankfully this does not seem to matter as Rathbone certainly uses the screentime he does have at his disposal to realize his own approach to the often played character.

Rathbone on the outset certainly succeeds in his creation of Holmes's personal style. Rathbone exudes that considerable confidence needed for the part as he suggests Holmes as a man who is absolutely in command of the investigation. Rathbone brings the needed eloquence to Holmes as he goes about deciphering the case, and is the smooth detective he should be. The intelligence of the character is made simply a constant by Rathbone as he makes it completely convincing as Holmes does not lose a moment in his attempt to decipher the clues. Now another pivotal aspect to any Holmes portrayal though is also how the actor plays Holmes as a man and not just a detective. This area is technically limited here once again since there is not a great deal of Holmes in the film, but also given the specifically non-personal association Holmes has with this case.  Nevertheless within these margins Rathbone is still able to realize the nature of his Holmes as a person. Rathbone's approach to Holmes is rather interesting and quite surprising in terms of both Rathbone as a performer, and the character. That being Rathbone brings a considerable sense of fun to the detective. 

Now Rathbone does have that certain lack of courtesy that is common in Holmes's portrayal, that being he never minds showing off his own intelligence and does not mind indicating the lack of intelligence of others. That goes even to Dr. Watson in this version which is fitting given that Bruce's approach to the character is that of really a buffoon. Rathbone does not make this seem as cruel as this probably should be given how there is a definite warmth that Rathbone carries in his approach that always keeps his ribbing of others rather good natured. Rathbone carefully avoids being smug in the least always providing a definite charm to the detective who does not mind letting everyone know he's a genius yet does in a fashion that somehow is rather endearing. Rathbone importantly keeps a complete lack of malice in any of this as he portrays a genuine friendship with Watson, but just happens to be aware of his friend's shortcomings as well. Rathbone doesn't overwhelm with levity either though as Rathbone's performance never loses the gravity of the situation created by the mystery. His reactions are particularly effective in that they do not reveal some otherworldly immortal especially during the climax where Rathbone reveals some understandable fear in the detective. Basil Rathbone's success in the role is evident, and his many returns are understandable as he gives an appropriately well rounded and appealing portrayal of Holmes. His detective is the genius he should be, with an ego to be sure, but still a man who cares about those he is trying to help.

Thursday, 3 March 2016

Alternate Best Actor 1939

And the Nominees Were Not:

Charles Laughton in The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Conrad Veidt in The Spy in Black

Henry Fonda in Young Mr. Lincoln

James Cagney in The Roaring Twenties

Basil Rathbone in The Hound of Baskervilles

Thursday, 4 July 2013

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1938: Basil Rathbone in The Adventures of Robin Hood, Pat O'Brien in Angels With Dirty Faces, Edward Arnold in You Can't Take It With You, and Results

Basil Rathbone did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sir Guy of Gisbourne in The Adventures of Robin Hood.

One must really question what the academy is thinking sometimes like in 1938 when they nominated Basil Rathbone for his performance in If I Were King instead of his performance in The Adventures of Robin Hood which was nominated for best picture. Rathbone's performance in If I Were King is a rather strange one playing the scheming King of the film like a kooky old man for some reason. Rathbone in The Adventures of Robin Hood, as the main physical threat to Robin Hood, gives the much stronger performance then in his Oscar nominated turn.

Sir Guy actually is not the most complex of parts, as he is the bad guy who definitely wants to kill Robin Hood, and at least at first wishes to marry the Maid Marian for himself. There technically is not too much more of him so the rest is really left to Rathbone. Firstly Rathbone is the right physical presence for the role. When he fights he has that right menace to seem the appropriate threat to Robin Hood. More than that though Rathbone plays off Errol Flynn well by counteracting the pleasure Flynn shows in his role, with pleasure in Guy when he tries to kill Robin Hood, a different kind of pleasure though a sadistic pleasure.

Past the action scenes though Rathbone handles Guy well particularly in his relationship to Maid Marian. Although at first Rathbone shows an interest in her as more of for a prize more than anything else, but this soon changes to brief frustration then quickly suspicion when Robin Hood seems to be having a little too much help. Rathbone is very good in his portraying the cunning in Guy as he figures out what Marian is doing, and he does well to make Guy more than just the man who Robin constantly gets the upper hand on.

Rathbone plays the straight villain quite well here while leaving Claude Rains to play the much more flamboyant role of King John. Rathbone does well not to try to attempt to one up Rains in any way instead while Rains takes the high road Rathbone takes the low road. He allows Rains to be the villain who just loves being a villain while he acts the far more serious threat who actually attempts to figure out way to kill Robin Hood. Rathbone stands well within the film allowing Flynn and Rains to be the more lively presences, but all the while making his own impact as the real threat in the film.
Pat O'Brien did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Fr. Jerry Connolly in Angels With Dirty Faces.

Pat O'Brien plays the adults of one of two boys who committed small time crimes when they were young. There difference came in that Jerry was able to outrun the police whereas Rocky (James Cagney) was not able to get away. This created their paths in life with Rocky only becoming more hardened in prison, and slowly becoming a man deeper into the life of crime, whereas Jerry took a very different path becoming a priest who only wishes to do good to help his community particularly the neighborhood boys who could either take the right path or fall into crime as Rocky did.

O'Brien actually has a rather similar role to Spencer Tracy's Oscar winning role in Boys Town. O'Brien's performance and the role though are far more complex than Tracy's work though. One of the best parts of Angels with Dirty Faces is the fact that the good priest and the bad criminal are friends in the film. This might not have worked so well but O'Brien and Cagney, who were best friends in real life, have terrific chemistry together. They just have such a natural warmth to one another and both Cagney and O'Brien suggest the past with one another incredibly well, and O'Brien does well to suggest that Jerry does have a certain nostalgia for his days as a juvenile delinquent along with Rocky.

Jerry and Rocky due come into conflict due to Rocky still engaging in criminal activities well Jerry is trying to stop the criminal activity in the neighborhood. O'Brien is excellent in portraying the humble conviction in Jerry as he tries to stop Rocky from corrupting the boys who idolizes him. The reason O'Brien is so effective though is that within his strong passion for his cause he does as well express his friendship with Rocky. O'Brien suggests that to a certain extent that pressing Rocky in this way does pain Jerry. O'Brien is very genuine as he shows that although he hates what Rocky stands for, he cannot ever forget his strong friendship with him.

O'Brien by always being genuine in portraying how he feels about Rocky gives a true power to his character, and never for a moment does he make Jerry seem the least bit sanctimonious. Near the end of the film Jerry asks Rocky to swallow his pride and do something good with his final moments by pretending to yellow before he is executed that way the boys will not look up to Rocky. This is a difficult scene for O'Brien as Jerry is asking Rocky for a lot in what is his final moments. O'Brien though absolutely earns the moment though because O'Brien is able to express the heartbreak in the scene as it is not just anyone he is asking to go out like coward, its his best friend.

O'Brien performance is essential to the film as one could easily be distracted by all the gangster half of the picture, and actually forget about O'Brien part. O'Brien does not allow that instead he and Cagney make the dynamic between the lives of Jerry and Rocky the best part of the picture. O'Brien's Jerry acts as the perfect anchor to Cagney's Rocky, as he takes the high flying action of the mob dealings and takes it down with the true weight of what those actions bring. The very best moment of O'Brien's performance comes at the end when he asks to boys to pray for the boy who could not run as fast he could. O'Brien gives the line the true poignancy it deserves and makes the conclusion of the film truly heartbreaking.
Edward Arnold did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Anthony P. Kirby in You Can't Take it With You.

You Can't Take it With You is a nicely handled film by Frank Capra about the clash between a family of free spirits the Vanderhoffs and a rich stuffy family.

Edward Arnold plays the head of the rich family who is on the verge of a take over. Arnold is a bit of an underrated character actor of the period who often plays rich and powerful types. Arnold when given the opportunity could do more with his roles than just be commanding in his presence, even though he could be commanding with ease to. At the beginning of this film he plays mostly the rich man who does not seem to care too much about anything other than making more money even if that means walking over his colleagues or demolishing peoples homes if they interfere with his plans.

Arnold is always good at being the rich Scrooge type with his strong forceful personality. Where many actors might have been just only been the rich man, Arnold does bring some nice bits of humanity in the part. Importantly they are short rather subtle moments so no one would think he isn't a ruthless business man, but Arnold does bring these short little moments to establish that there is another man in there trying to get out. These short reactions are very well handled by Arnold such as when shows that Kirby does enjoy some of the antics of Vanderhoff family while his wife is completely appalled by their behavior.

Where every other character in the film is pretty much set in their various roles, Arnold has the one role that changes throughout the course of the film. The change is played out in Arnold's performance in an almost exclusively silent fashion. Arnold therefore has to carry most it himself and he does not disappoint in this regard. He conveys the internal struggle in Kirby in brief little moments that are very well handled. He shows so much in just the way Kirby looks as the harmonic he got from the Vanderhoff's home, and he expresses just how much Kirby honestly wishes to break out of his life.

When Kirby does have its turn around it not only is moving, but it is as well entirely believable because Arnold plants the seeds of the change earlier in the film. Arnold carefully does not go to far with the moments beforehand and does make Kirby the hard shell he should be as well. He earns this change in Kirby, and enables to to have the impact on the film it should. He is the one that makes the very last scene as heartwarming as it is because he only ever portrayed an honest transition from a man who only cares about money to a man who wants to enjoy life for all that it's worth.
Other Performances:
Claude Rains in The Adventures of Robin Hood- As I said in Rathbone review Rains gives the flamboyant villain turn in the film, and actually gives the performance Rathbone should have given in If I Were King. Rains is no stranger in playing evil characters, and Rains usually finds a one to make one evil baddie at least a little different from another. As Prince John Rains plays him as a man who was always a spoiled brat. He does this rather well and is quite good in showing his tyrannical behavior mostly comes from childlike selfish sensibility. Rains is very good in taking the limited role and making entertaining by adding this little eccentricity. It also adds much more to his character by showing why exactly Prince John would act the way he does. Prince John could have been a one note jerk. Rains does more than that though by playing him as a fancy boy, and giving a fairly entertaining performance.
Lew Ayres in Holiday- Lew Ayres plays Katherine Hepburn's brother Ned who is both a musician and a drunkard. Ayers basically does two things in this role saying cynical lines that refute his father's view of the world or cynical lines that support Cary Grant's character's views. Ayres does this rather well actually as always the somber, but not sober source of wisdom. There is not a whole lot for him to do, and unfortunately he doesn't really get to get on the more comedic moments of the film. He does fulfill his part of the story rather well though.
Overall Rank:
  1. Pat O'Brien in Angels With Dirty Faces
  2. Edward Arnold in You Can't Take It With You
  3. Michel Simon in Port of Shadows
  4. Basil Rathbone in The Adventures of Robin Hood
  5. Claude Rains in The Adventures of Robin Hood
  6. Walter Brennan in Kentucky
  7. Erich von Stroheim in Les Disparus de Saint-Agil
  8. James Stewart in You Can't Take It With You 
  9. Louis Jouvet in Hotel du Nord
  10. Pierre Renoir in La Marseillaise
  11. Michel Simon in Les Disparus de Saint-Agil
  12. Franchot Tone in Three Comrades
  13. Pierre Brasseur in Port of Shadows 
  14. Louis Jouvet in La Marseillaise
  15. Robert Morley in Marie Antoinette
  16. Lew Ayres in Holiday
  17. Ralph Richardson in The Citadel 
  18. Paul Lukas in The Lady Vanishes  
  19. Armand Bernard in Les Disparus de Saint-Agil
  20. Humphrey Bogart in Angels With Dirty Faces 
  21. Marcel Mouloudji in Les Disparus de Saint-Agil
  22. Ralph Richardson in The Divorce of Lady X 
  23. Charles Coburn in Of Human Hearts
  24. Basil Radford in The Lady Vanishes
  25. John Carradine in Of Human Hearts
  26. Robert Young in Three Comrades
  27. David Niven in The Dawn Patrol
  28. Edward Everett Horton in Bluebeard's Eighth Wife
  29. Gene Lockhart in A Christman Carol 
  30. Benard Blier in Hotel du Nord
  31. Naunton Wayne in The Lady Vanishes 
  32. Wilfrid Lawson in Pygmalion 
  33. Basil Rathbone in The Dawn Patrol
  34. Billy Halop in Angels With Dirty Faces
  35. Harry Davenport in You Can't Take It With You
  36. Fernard Ledoux in The Human Beast 
  37. Donald Crisp in The Dawn Patrol
  38. Joseph Schildkraut in Marie Antoinette 
  39. Ralph Bellamy in Carefree
  40. Edward Everette Horton in Holiday 
  41. Don Ameche in Alexander's Ragtime Band 
  42. Allen Jenkins in A Slight Case of Murder
  43. Walter Catlett in Bringing Up Baby
  44. James Finlayson in Block-Heads
  45. Cecil Parker in The Lady Vanishes 
  46. Rex Harrison in The Citadel 
  47. Aime Clariond in Les Disparus de Saint-Agil
  48. Claude Rains in Four Daughters
  49. Cecil Parker in The Citadel
  50. Billy Gilbert in Block-Heads
  51. Leo Gorcey in Angels With Dirty Faces 
  52. Eugene Palette in The Adventures of Robin Hood 
  53. Alan Mowbray in Merrily We Live
  54. Misha Auer in You Can't Take It With You 
  55. Humphrey Bogart in The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse
  56. Nikolay Okhlopkov in Alexander Nevsky
  57. Charles Ruggles in Bringing Up Baby
  58. George Bancroft in Angels With Dirty Faces 
  59. Barry Fitzgerald in Bringing Up Baby 
  60. Chico Marx in Room Service
  61. David Niven in Bluebeard's Eighth Wife 
  62. Spencer Tracy in Test Pilot
  63. Harpo Marx in Room Service
  64. Robert Newton in The Beachcomber
  65. Andrei Abrikosov in Alexander Nevsky 
  66. Joseph Calleia in Algiers 
  67. Rex Harrison Sidewalks of London 
  68. Jean-Pierre Aumont in Hotel du Nord
  69. Ian Hunter in The Adventures of Robin Hood 
  70. Walter Brennan in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
  71. Frank McHugh in Four Daughters
  72. Gene Lockhart in Algiers
  73. Donald Meek in You Can't Take It With You
  74. Herbert Mundin in The Adventures of Robin Hood
  75. Victor Jory in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
  76. Samuel S. Hinds in You Can't Take It With You
  77. Leo G. Carroll in A Christmas Carol 
  78. Charles Coburn in Vivacious Lady
  79. Melville Cooper in The Adventures of Robin Hood
  80. Tom Brown in  Merrily We Live
  81. Henry Kolker in Holiday
  82. John Garfield in Four Daughters 
  83. Tyrone Power in Marie Antoinette
  84. Barry MacKay in A Christmas Carol
  85. John Barrymore in Marie Antoinette
  86. Basil Rathbone in If I Were King
  87. Terry Kilburn in A Christmas Carol
Next Year: 1994 lead

Thursday, 22 September 2011

Best Supporting Actor 1938: Results

5. Basil Rathbone in If I Were King-Rathbone sometimes just gives a rather dull villainous performance, but other times he gives a needlessly strange performance as if the King was a crazy old man.
4. John Garfield in Four Daughters- Yes it is true Garfield has an intense on screen presence, but unfortunately in this case he does not serve it to really create a character. Instead he only ever scratches the surface with his performance, and unfortuantely at the end of his performance he overacts a great deal.
3. Gene Lockhart in Algiers- Lockhart is able to be pathetic enough as Regis the informer, but unfortuantely he always seems miscast in the role. This is because he never seems like a truly convincing slimy rat he should be.
2. Robert Morley in Marie Antoinette- Morley gives a good humorous performance in his first half, and than an effectively sad performance in his second half. It never is quite a great performance, and he is forgotten for a good deal of the picture, but it remains a good one.
1. Walter Brennan in Kentucky- Yes Walter Brennan is one actor the academy got absolutely right, every time he won, he deserved to win. Brennan gives an effective performance as an old man with a grudge, as well as love. Brennan who transforms himself to almost double his age seamlessly also manages to show the grudge as something the old man simply cannot shake since it has been something with him for so long, as well as his love for horses as something just as deep as the hatred, even deeper, since Brennan carefully shows it overcome his feelings of hatred.
Deserving Performances:
Pat O'Brien in Angels With Dirty Faces
Edward Arnold in You Can't Take it With You

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Best Supporting Actor 1938: Basil Rathbone in If I Were King

Basil Rathbone received his second and final Oscar nomination for portraying King Louis XI in If I Were King.

If I Were King tells the story of a rebellious poet who ends up as Grand Constable in France.

Rathbone portrays King Louis XI who is an incompetent, and rather unintelligent King who attempts to scheme to keep power by using the Poet Francois Vilon (Ronald Colman), but the Poet constantly gets the better of him. Rathbone really plays the part rather oddly because sometimes he plays it fairly normally, but other times he acts like some sort of kooky old man for no apparent reason. There is not a consistency between these two portrayals.

Both portrayals are not particularly interesting as well. When he is the Kooky old man he is really over the top with his mannerisms, and not very amusing except for one line at the end of the film, but one line out of as many as he has is to few. When not acting kooky he is just rather dull, so either way this is just not a very interesting performance by Rathbone. Yes he gets the incompetence down, but doing that is not that hard, if he had been infused with some more humor perhaps his performance could have been something memorable but as it is his performance is rather forgettable.

Best Supporting Actor 1938

And the Nominees Were:

Gene Lockhart in Algiers 

John Garfield in Four Daughters

Walter Brennan in Kentucky

Basil Rathbone in If I Were King

Robert Morley in Marie Antoinette 

Thursday, 15 July 2010

Best Supporting Actor 1936: Results

5. Mischa Auer in My Man Godfrey- Auer's whole purpose is to be funny, and I never found him to be so.

4. Stuart Erwin in Pigskin Parade- I sort of liked Erwin's performance as the hill billy football star because he did not go over the top, but he was not exactly amazing either.
3. Akim Tamiroff in The General Died at Dawn- Tamiroff at least does not go over the top with his Chinese general but he is so stiff that his performance never holds much interest.
2. Basil Rathbone in Romeo and Juliet- Rathbone is fine as Tybalt, although not great, but than again Tybalt is not much of a character. 
1. Walter Brennan in Come and Get It- Brennan accent is not perfect and his role becomes too reduced for most of the film, but he is incredibly strong in the early scenes when he needs to be.
Deserving Performances:
Frank Morgan in The Great Ziegfeld
Peter Lorre in Secret Agent
Robert Young in Secret Agent

Best Supporting Actor 1936: Basil Rathbone in Romeo and Juliet

Basil Rathbone received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Tybalt in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.

Romeo and Juliet is a fairly poor adaptation of Shakespeare's plays because they fail to really make language work, and many of the performances are incredibly dull.

Basil Rathbone plays Tybalt who is hardly the greatest of Shakespeare's characters. In fact Tybalt does very little in the play therefore he does very little in this film. He is merely one of the Capulet's who want to get in a good fight with the Montagues. He does very little until he kills Mercutio and then is later killed by Romeo. He really is more of a plot catalyst than a real character. He lacks any big speeches, and his biggest scenes are sword fights. I hate to sound repetitive  but he is another nominee with very little to do.

Tybalt is no Hamlet, and Rathbone I suppose is no Olivier. He does not really make it come alive though but he handles it well enough. He never is really interesting though with his performance, but Tybalt himself is not a very interesting character anyways. He does just what about should be expected from Tybalt I suppose but that is very little. The biggest thing expected of him is to perform well in the sword fighting scenes. Rathbone excels at this I suppose, but then again maybe he is too good since it does not really look like Leslie Howard's Romeo really had a chance, and Rathbone losing seems a little forced. Rathbone is not bad as Tybalt, Tybalt just is not much of a character but someone still could have been better as Tybalt.

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

Best Supporting Actor 1936

And the first ever nominees in this category were:

Mischa Auer in My Man Godfrey

Basil Rathbone in Romeo and Juliet

Akim Tamiroff in The General Died at Dawn

Stuart Erwin in The Pigskin Parade

Walter Brennan in Come and Get It

Who do you pick? What do you predict my ranking will be?