Thursday, 29 January 2026

Best Actor 2025: Wagner Moura in The Secret Agent

Wagner Moura received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Armando Solimões aka Marcelo Alves in The Secret Agent. 

The Secret Agent takes place in Brazil during the military dictatorship as we follow one targeted man trying to survive in the regime and escape to safety.  

Wagner Moura joins the small ranks of actors nominated for a wholly international non-English Language film, interestingly with many companion qualities on the surface to Leonardo DiCaprio’s nominated work, though stylistically very differently as he also plays a man who goes into hiding with technically an assumed name after losing the mother of child. Although beyond the description this is a very different performance and for much of the film his performance very much is bringing to life the reality of the situation, which is an interesting aspect given many aspects of this film have a degree of surrealism from director Kleber Mendonça Filho. Moura’s performance is distinctly and often subtly about dealing with the reality of the dictatorship very much as an anchor point. An aspect established in his first scene where he stops at a gas station seeing a dead man just lying on the ground, from a supposed failed robbery, meanwhile the cops stop by at the same station not to take care of the body or even address the robbery, rather to just hector Moura’s Armando a bit and steal what bit of money he has. Moura’s performance captures the reality quite effectively however as a man who has to keep together and find a way to exist within the pressure that if he showed too much sympathy he’d be in trouble with the cops. Moura’s performance is able to express the quiet dismay at the police but also his eyes show a greater distress in seeing the body so carelessly kept rotting away in the sand. 

We follow Armando as he goes to Recife and lives in a refugee apartment essentially along with other refugees run by the idiosyncratic Dona (Tânia Maria). There he catches the eye of Claudia (Hermila Guedes) with whom he quickly begins a sexual relationship. An aspect where I wouldn’t describe it as a romance rather kind of empathy understanding of time and place. Where Moura doesn’t suggest some switch to a new love but rather just the innate attraction to a beautiful woman and an understated yet still palatable connection based upon their mutual situation. We follow Armando as he reconnects with his son Fernando, a kid who due to his age is more interested in seeing the movie Jaws than is really all too aware of all the present situations. Moura though is quite effective in creating the natural sense of the relationship between the two. You see the sense of unqualified love for his son, and really the attempts at bringing just a bit of levity as the dad trying to be the fun dad even though he’s in a circumstance that really prevents him from being the dad he’d like to be. Moura playing the levels where you sense his want to just be there for his son so purely meanwhile having the emotional struggle of the death of his wife and trying to speak to his son about the situation in as calm of a way as he’d understand. 

His son is currently being watched by his father-in-law Sr. Alexandre (Carlos Francisco) who runs the local movie theater. We get another relationship between the two that is rather interesting as Moura in part has moments of a better sense of history as he can’t help but bemused by a woman possessed by the screening of The Exorcist, and we get the connection the two share in their mutual love for Fernando. There’s a complexity though where Alexandre questions if Armando cheated on his daughter while they were married. Moura plays the moment in a very fascinating way because he doesn’t definitely answer the question yet he gives a complex response. Where you see a certain defensiveness, also shame, however not shame of necessarily a cheater but rather just a man feeling guilt over his deceased wife in general. Moura creates the sense of really how much he did love her yet still presenting some conflicting feelings of how he failed her in some ways, which is left open to interpretation though I took it more of his failures to protect her. The common trait consistently in this moment as we get in so many moments though is of creating such a remarkable detail in a man who in a way we only get a brief glimpse of yet Moura intends to tell us a whole life. 

A lot of Moura’s performance is reactionary despite being the lead yet that isn’t in any way a criticism or a limitation. Rather Moura takes into the details of his world by conveying it through his powerful eyes of watching the world around him. As we follow him as he has a job setup at archives, where he intends to find some kind of documentation on the life of his own mother while also avoiding the law, unfortunately the corrupt police chief occasionally uses the building to look more official and is stationed nearby. Moura’s performance takes it all in quite naturally where we get his bits of bemusement at coworkers being attracted to him, his quiet concern but also befuddlement at seeing the sloppy yet oppressive operations of the police near him. Moura in each beat manages to highlight the humanity of the situation by so empathetically conveying what he’s going through in this curious state. A state that isn’t all sadness, there’s moments of joy but it is also just a constant struggle. A struggle that gets greater because the police chief takes a liking to Armando, much to his own chagrin. Moura’s terrific in his finding the face of a man just going along not to upset the chief, who likes to go around hassling a local German mainly, and seeing the understated disgust he manages to hold behind it all, with a bit of concern for his safety. Moura’s performance works very much in the margins here and brilliantly so as we very much live within his headspace. 

We eventually learn what is behind this whole situation and what is really going on in the deep recesses of Armando’s mind when he meets with a resistance group attempting to help him while also documenting his story. This is one of Moura’s most expressive scenes and he does not waste it as Armando begins to speak of how he got here due to his former days as a college professor where his views contrasted heavily with a visiting powerful executive Ghirotti. Moura’s delivery of explaining that he’s killed the man with a hammer is so powerful because he's been such a normal calm guy before this point, but also we see just how much pain from the past is in this single statement. Pain from the interaction we will soon see but also pain for what this man represents to him. We see in flashback a bit of a different man in Armando, and not just the beard. Moura shows an interesting alternative of the man in a way seemingly weighted by his own political passions a bit more in his interactions with the man where he makes it quite openly clear in his reactions even when he doesn’t say it. Moura shows the man ready to make a statement even if he keeps a certain fitting college professor's dignity in these moments. There is also less of a sadness about him given his wife is very much alive, and while the focus of these scenes isn’t strictly on their relationship the two performers quickly, without any fuss, grant you a sense of their ease together. 

Within the flashback you see as Armando makes his disagreements with Ghirotti known with an academic but still passionate candor. Unfortunately Ghirotti doesn’t take it as a respectful disagreement as he, and his equally horrible son, continue to prod Armando and his wife, and so far as to make it wholly personal leading to a physical confrontation. Moura in the scene projects directly his support and care for his wife, and the quiet disgust of the man. The reaction though is of someone with certainty of their belief but also levity of believing that they express themselves freely. Ghirotti however doesn't allow that as he has hired hitmen to kill Armando’s for the disagreement. Back to the present Moura’s reaction is outstanding where we see his genuine disbelief that anyone would go to such a measure mixed within the existential horror and a degree of just being lost in how his world could suddenly come to such a strange place. The group leaves Armando with the warning and the promise of escape however only after a few days. Where Armando continues to try to exist best he can. Where we have a great moment where he and the other refugees bond over their situations. Moura’s delivery of his situation as a man marked for death is amazing because there’s so much sadness to it, a bit of almost comic reaction to the ridiculousness of the idea, but also the painful glint of hope as he shares his struggle with others in a similar situation with such sincere warmth. 

We follow Armando through one more day which begins with a nightmare where he sees different aspects of his life with the reminders of the death threat and Moura’s heart wrenching in his awakening as he gives the most potent reaction in the film. As Moura isn’t just a man waking up from a nightmare, there’s all the pain and fear he’s going through, all releasing itself as he screams without conscious control. Armando continues on however as we see him going about still trying to find the document on his mother to prove her existence, where Moura’s simple yet profound delivery emphasizes just how much the document means as a memorial to her. We also have a truly moving moment where his father-in-law comes to show him a message from Fernando that essentially says he wishes to live with his dad. Moura’s understated reaction of just deep affection, sadness but also love is just so beautifully rendered in seeing how much joy Armando gets from his son wanting to go with him. In the reaction Moura conveys both the sense of love for his son but still the stinging loss of his wife and really his family from the circumstances he lives in now. Speaking of the circumstances, unfortunately a hitman shows up eyeing Armando, where Moura’s performance suddenly becomes the lead to the thriller that the name of the film might suggest. Where Moura takes you through every emotional beat as he keeps the calm manner yet in his eyes you can see the intensity of his anxiety, which he attempts to alleviate by asking the corrupt chief for help. Which results in a bloody gunfight between the chief’s men and the hitman, which Moura’s reactions again are so key in embodying the horror of the moment, though also that they need to survive. As he makes you feel every step of his throughout the scene building to the pressure of making the call and pleading to make his escape. 

The film abruptly cuts to the present day where we find researchers uncovering Armando’s sad story that ends like Llewelyn Moss in No Country For Old Men, with an onscreen death. Which in a way reflects the real purpose of Moura’s performance which is to make you fully understand this life, the fears, the loves, the moments of happiness, just the moments of observation and understand the loss of a single life within this cruel system. BUT, Moura also plays one more part as he also plays the older Fernando in the modern day, now a doctor who speaks to the researcher for a bit. It’s a brief secondary performance, unlike Jordan though it is interesting that he connects to another lead from this year, where Moura doesn’t waste the opportunity to present a very different man in Fernando. He doesn’t simply make him the father, we see the son with a different timbre of voice, different physical manner and just spirit. Not in an overly showy way but a way where you accept him as the son not the father. His scene is brief but well observed where Moura’s delivery offers a combination between a nostalgia for the joy he can feel from the time and the deep existential sadness connected to the fact that he has no conscious memories of his father. Moura’s very moving because you just sense the wishes of having been able to know his father but also the calm acceptance of the man now living on with the blunt truth that Armando is a memory he’ll never have. Both performances offering a beautiful testament to a central idea of the film, of the importance of a single victim and how it echoes through time. 

15 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Thoughts on the direction.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Even if he's my least favorite of the nominees, it's still a really good portrayal of a decent man existing in a dangerous time, that restaurant argument scene is a killer.

Louis: Your past roles for Moura? Also do you think he may be the most extreme actor you ever covered on this blog? It seems that he either gets high 4.5s or more when he's good, but when he's bad, he's lucky to get a 2 from you.

BRAZINTERMA said...

Great review. Congratulations, Louis.
This is the post I've been waiting for my whole life. What a satisfaction to see a Brazilian actor get a 5 here.
I can't wait for the day when Louis and all of you see another great performances by Moura: Elite Squad 1 and 2, the best Brazilian franchise. Two perfect films to watch together, the same way to watch: Cameron's Terminators and Raimi's Spider-Man 1 and 2.

Calvin Law said...

Performance of the year for me and you expressed everything great about his largely reactionary, always potent work here; in particular love the way you discuss his work in the scenes with Francisco (who's shattered my heart every time he appeared). Love the variety of him having a review for this and also Puss in Boots 2.

He's also so great in his final scene that I would honestly have had him in my Supporting lineup if that was his only scene in the film.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on the screenplay, and also the performances of Carlos Francisco, Tânia Maria, Robério Diógenes, Maria Fernanda Cândido, Alice Carvalho and Hermila Guedes (who plays the lover and the performance you are referring to instead of Isabél Zuaa, but it's an easy mistake when writing a review - big cast with a lot of names).

Robert MacFarlane said...

Would you say Moura has some of the biggest extremes in terms of "modes"? I remember you praising him on Narcos not too long after you thrashed him for Elysium.

Anonymous said...

Is this the first time a Best Actor Oscar lineup has featured two actors with dual roles?

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on the rest of the cast of The Secret Agent?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: With ratings/upgrades.

Shaggy Rogers said...

It's also the winner of my overall lead.
You know, a friend of mine said that The Secret Agent is the current film that flirts most with Chinatown for four reasons:
- Visual aesthetics
- That sunny atmosphere of the place
- Narrative deviation. When the films start, we think we're going to follow one type of story, but as it goes on, the plot changes direction
- Film titles that have poetic meaning

Perfectionist said...

I hope Lee takes the overall. He already eclipsed Edgerton as my win in my previous watch. But a recent rewatch further confirmed it as my second favorite performance of the year.

Perfectionist said...

Chalamet has such an unremarkable fucking screen presence. I'm sure, technically it is a solid performance, but Lee is just fucking insane in his performance. Like bonkers. 5th times a charm, finally wins the overall.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Mendonça’s directorial style is quite fascinating because he does extremely stylized in such a “I’m just doing this now” way that has a certain curiosity to it, where we have randomly a CGI cat with two faces, we get an extreme slit diopter shot with the emphasis of the thriller, we get sudden time leaps, we get a hairy leg randomly attacking people, while also presenting the environment more often in a more naturalistic approach, a style utilized by his previous two films although maybe even more extreme feeling here because it does feel like he is telling a more realistic story within this stylizations. Which the strangeness, against moments of just quieter interaction is a juxtaposition that is strange yet works as this kind of highlights of maybe a distorted memory. Although I will say on re-watch Mendonça’s seemingly random approach, that to be fair does cohere, did make me feel the length, as we spend so much time with the random scumbags who are fairly similar in that they’re all retched and I’ll admit his editing choices did feel maybe too relaxed in just a few respects. And could this film be tightened, yes and do I think it would be an improvement, also yes. As you could reduce the scumbag scenes, which set up mostly things we already know about anyway, we could reduce the flash forwards, which have a very distinct purpose, but other than the last scene they are kind of boring as presented in comparison, which again with purpose but doesn’t make them more exciting. But hey, I will still always give all the credit to the failed hit scene, which is just masterful dynamic filmmaking where you see him pull out all the stops, from the choices in shots, to the tension of the music, to the extremely taut editing. It is exceptional.

Ytrewq & Robert:

Well he’s certainly on the list. And live action wise I think he’s better suited to the more subtle. In terms of the extreme hit and missers (and not in a career trend way like say Rod Steiger), I’d say Sean Penn and Mark Ruffalo also fit the bill.

In terms of Past Roles Then For Moura:

Harry Caul
Heurtebise (Orpheus)

Calvin:

The screenplay is fascinating even if I have a bit more reservations about it on this watch which I’ll cover first. Which again not sure we needed so much scumbaggery, to the point of three different sets of scumbags, where except for the last one (which I think is largely performance not screenplay), they are pretty much scumbags in very similar ways, and not all that interesting. I think that’s the point being made in the screenplay mind you, but there’s just way too much of nearly interchangeable guys being slimeballs. Also the present day scenes just are kind of too straightforward and a little “blah” I get its being matter of fact, but it just again seems a place where I think there could’ve been more except for the Fernando scene which is terrific. Which again I still really like the film, but that’s why it remains where it does, for me. Having said beyond that though the film has a tone of brilliance in terms of its construction of a world based upon memory in this way, as we follow this one man’s story and basically how he became an enemy of the powers that be. Where certain asides, like noting what movies were playing, showing Fernando’s Jaws obsession, and depicting different specific elements of the atmosphere in little and big ways, is all great. From the use of carnival, and the death count, to the various refugees, even the hairy leg which is a bizarre choice I don’t mind as a reflection of the essential censorship as the explanation, and part of the “lore” of the period. I think fundamentally just giving Armando’s story specific life, where that is where it plays around less, in depicting his relationships with his father in law and son, and wife. Creating a fundamental anchor at the center of it all.

Louis Morgan said...


Francisco - (Lovely work where you just get the considerable sense of love she had for his daughter and his grandson so earnestly. Especially in just his reactions to the testimony scene where you see how much hearing about it tears him up and really any mention of the daughter, though he doesn’t have a full breakdown you see how painful the wound is. To the point of blaming Fernando a bit as Francisco plays it so well in showing the conflicting feelings even they don’t overwhelm to the point of mistreating him. Contrasting that beautifully is every moment regarding his grandson where he reinforces just the simplicity of the love her has there even a bit of guard in his delivery of Fernando “taking” him away, he manages to convey his heartbreak combined with his understanding.)

Maria - (Just brings an expected sort of color to the flamboyant refugee apartments owner, where you get a quick sense of her passion for it in a specific way even as she is often blunt in her asides which she delivers with such a naturalistic comedic quality. But when explaining her own beliefs you do see the earnest passion about it even as she kind of covers it up with a believable kooky style energy of someone who still absolutely cares even though she’s been through a whole lot.)

Candido - (I think she’s fine but I didn’t really get that much from her performance beyond convincing delivery of her exposition.)

Carvalho - (A short performance obviously however importantly you get a quick sense of her mutual passion with Moura’s where their scenes really aren’t about their relationship directly yet you feel the connection through their mutual sense of what they care about and the connective disgust for the same man, though hers is even more intense and effectively so in that department.)

Guedes - (Again mostly about that specific chemistry with Moura where you sense just really they have an attraction that is a big part of it, but there’s the right combination between a playfulness in sort of enjoying the moment and genuine empathy in her moments of support with him.)

Lucas:

Diogenese, Villela - (The first time as the dad scumbags, where they are both properly sloppy and hideous in their way of just enjoying their terrible power position. And while I could’ve used less of them they do deliver what they need to.)

Martins, De Arajuo, Leone - (These three I thought all hit basically the same quiet psychopath note for scumbag instead, which on re-watch found kind of dull. I do think it is more the writing that draws them all from the same cloth on purpose, but still a bland cloth.)

Venâncio - (On re-watch found him the most interesting scumbag, maybe because he has the least screentime but regardless. Still found there was a little life story we got with that undercurrent of desperation within his danger that was particularly menacing. And in a way he becomes kind of a secondary lead in the final past sequence, which he delivers on creating the sense of vicious intensity of a killer but with a precision of someone who intends to survive.)

Anonymous:

I’m pretty sure it is.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: What are your Top 5 winners of the Best Actor award at the Cannes Film Festival of this decade (2021 to 2025)?