Matthew Macfadyen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Fitzwilliam Darcy in Pride & Prejudice.
Although as I recall when this version came out, the age old question of how many adaptations do we need? Although notably, despite many tv movies/television miniseries, this is only the second straight adaptation of the novel after the 1940 version with Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier in the central roles. That version takes many liberties including fashioning the story in many ways as more so as the romantic comedy standard of that time. This version attempts a more earnest adaptation of the novel, specifically in terms of placing us within a stricter perspective of Elizabeth Bennett (Keira Knightley) as the story unfolds, particularly within how we see Mr. Darcy is played by Matthew Macfadyen. Macfadyen’s performance in turn is not as the instantly romantic seeming man, far from it, and not at all the more benevolent caddish quality of a William Powell/Cary Grant type. This idea being something Macfadyen strictly plays into as we first see him in full brood quite honestly. A man basically just muttering to himself, barely looking at anyone at a party, and being altogether unpleasant in both words and manner.
Macfadyen’s starting point is key for a few different reasons. One is this from the perspective of Elizabeth, so we shouldn’t really like Darcy much either since we are seeing it through her eyes and within that perspective Macfadyen is that you’ll take him quickly as just a pompous prideful man who evidently doesn’t have time with those he’d deem too lowly. Macfadyen’s performance goes beyond that however as what he also does is more convincingly play the introvert here. As introversion is oftentimes one of the most inaccurately portrayed ideas of film, and too often is depicted as basically an eccentric version of extroversion where even the awkwardness of the person seems still part of being outward. Macfadyen’s performance is more honest to the personality type as what his expressions emphasize in these early scenes is a man lost in his own thoughts, perhaps his own insecurities and within his own mental fixations. An honest depiction of an introvert, which again can be tricky as it is all about making it a man in part more preoccupied within his own thoughts, and that is something that Macfadyen conveys quite effortlessly without being vague either.
One other pivotal element within this introduction though is also the starting point of his Darcy as the unlikable man from Elizabeth’s perspective but also the more unhappy man within that from Macfadyen’s performance. We essentially see Darcy at his worst and Macfadyen crafts that convincingly. He could be just that stuffy fellow we never see again so what Macfadyen lays out is essentially a pathway for himself, where the audience along with Elizabeth will discover him, but we also will see what Darcy gains from the discovery. What Macfadyen then creates is the pathway for Darcy as Elizabeth learns more about him, but also the change in Darcy from that process. The second time they even meet Macfadyen is still rather cold as Darcy but we are granted a bit more nuance seemingly suggesting more to the man, even as his presence is still off-putting to a degree. Macfadyen does bring this exact conviction within Darcy’s words as he speaks of George Wickham, who wrongs Darcy in the past despite Wickham claiming the opposite. Further however is Macfadyen revealing more of Darcy such as the introverted creed of not being able to make conversation with strangers easily. Macfadyen’s delivery of this line honestly is pivotal because he doesn’t speak it as a rudeness, rather honesty of a man who finds discomfort in such crowds.
There is the nature of the surprise then of the scene where Darcy rather imperfectly proposes and states his love to Elizabeth most unexpectedly to her and really the audience. Something especially well realized in this idea because Macfadyen has been so cold, dismissive and direct, and could be simply a rude man, or a shy man suspicious of betrayal, something we will eventually learn is largely the latter. Macfadyen’s performance though is key because as imperfect as the surprise declaration is there is an earnestness within the nuances of Macfadyen’s performance. Deep down you can sense there is something so honest in the love as in his eyes there is even less of a weight as he states his intentions, even while still wrapped in the imperfection of the presentation and the context of it all. Something that only gets trickier when Darcy prevents a marriage for one of Elizabeth’s sisters with a degree of carelessness, where again Macfadyen’s delivery presents a man perhaps too gripped by his own logic and distrust as he explains his thoughts with very specific analysis however perhaps without much empathy. Macfadyen manages to present it though as someone too lost in his suspicions than purposeful cruelty.
When however Elizabeth stumbles into a more intimate moment where Darcy is listening to piano with his younger sister we are granted an instance of a different sight of the man, as we see the charm and even glow about him with his sister. We see the introverted no longer so guarded and Macfadyen’s specific expression of joy with her feels so honestly earned as the loving man beneath the armor against both betrayal and just general social requirement. What progresses naturally within the relationship is we both see a better Darcy and the growth of Darcy into a better man. Where Macfadyen does so much with the easing into connection with Elizabeth which is two fold where his deliveries and manner become more open, and wanting with connection. Importantly though this combined with this growing sense of joy that overcomes the weight of brooding, as he expresses in his work even just a levity in movement and a growing joy exudes off of him. Where Macfadyen crafts essentially the journey of the man as the introvert making connections to comfort, but also a man betrayed in the past willing to look beyond suspicion more easily to genuine connection. Naturally earning the shift within Darcy as he helps Elizabeth’s family openly which seems just the honest reaction through Macfadyen’s performance. Earning then the morning mist second declaration of love which Macfadyen plays so pitch perfectly. As now instead of sort of mutedly declaring against his judgement we see a man brimming with a personal confidence as he looks directly upon her and more importantly speaks the truth filled with a calm emotion of someone just stating his love so passionately. Macfadyen’s Darcy isn’t about charm, though I do think there is a charm to him, rather it is about creating a convincing pathway from a cold brooding betrayed man, to a good loving man, which Macfadyen articulates in powerful and moving detail.


37 comments:
I think the key moment in this performance for me is after he says "Not if I can help it" in regards to Elizabeth asking him if he dances. Once she walks away, he has that "Why the fuck did I just say that?" embarrassment on his face.
A shame you still don't like Knightley.
Wonderful performance, and probably my favourite thing about the film. He does very carefully show how his standoffishness is built out of a deep shyness and fear of getting hurt again, but you also believe fully why Elizabeth would be put off by him at first.
He's brilliant here, and I have no hesitation calling it the definitive version of Darcy as written in the novel. As he does convincingly show the transformation from a more taciturn, retiring sort who fucks up to a better person who does make amends.
Unrelated, but I also don't think there's many actors who have looked better onscreen than Macfadyen does here...to the point his Succession casting is something Avy Kaufman deserves all the credit for seeing.
Louis: Any upgrades for the cast, and your thoughts on the direction.
Louis: Thoughts on Hudson and Anderson in Song Sung Blue.
And will you be returning to the recommendations soon.
Excellent work, but sad you still don't like Knightley.
Re: DGA, can't complain too much as I love PTA's work, greatly admired Coogler and Safdie's and even though I didn't care too much for GDT and Zhao's films I'll always be happy to see them get acclaim, plus cool to see Elordi quietly making a case for a potential victory.
Re: ASC, happy to see Hamnet not make it (found Zal's work to be pretty underwhelming), but love four of the nominees and while I don't like Laustsen's work, again I see the appeal.
RatedRStar: This is rather random, but since you mentioned listening to MCR, Paramore, and Weezer a while ago, could I get your top 5 songs for each of them, if you're conversant enough with them to say?
I guess Knightley doesn't have the best reputation in Louis' eyes especially when she plays characters named Elizabeth.
Bafta longlists:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/bafta-film-awards-2026-longlists-one-battle-hamnet-sinners-1236468206/
Another omission for Wagner Moura. I'm done with this awards season.
Also, everyone: what are some of your yearly regular scheduled rewatches? I was checking out the logs for P&P and noticed Robert has watched it annually (which honestly seems like a great thing to do).
Calvin: I rewatch The End of The Tour on my birthday. Been doing it for 5 years now.
Would Hoult be reviewed for Superman, or did Louis gave his rating right away?? I forgot honestly.
Perfectionist: He gave him a 4.
Calvin: It's A Wonderful Life and Scrooge around every December/January.
Regarding BAFTA longlists:
Picture:
OBAA, Sinners, Hamnet, Marty, Frankenstein continuing to show strength. An important comeback for Sentimental Value, Bugonia even stronger than expected. The rest though very much feel like BAFTA only, and I mean I didn’t hate Nuremberg but what the hell is it doing there?
Director:
Del Toro missing in favor of Lanthimos and Trier. Meanwhile neither Mendonca or Panahi, which they didn’t have to show up here, particularly with the required gender split in the longlists, but definitely not a show of strength. Final five will be a tricky prediction.
Actor:
Moura needs to win that Globe. And to be fair Torres was also snubbed here, so I don’t think he’s out, but his competition isn’t showing any weakness as both Bugonia and Blue Moon did quite well overall.
Actress:
That would be quite the comeback if Seyfried gets nominated at this point. Otherwise everyone got in who seems in competition most important for Reinsve to show up here.
Supporting Actor:
The presumed five all here pivotal for Skarsgard, also Caton missing but Lindo getting in honestly just seems to help cement that presumed five further.
Supporting Actress:
SAG five plus Lilleaas, will be interesting to see who gets squeezed out. Maybe Paltrow showing up here complicates things for A’Zion but I don’t necessarily think so. Otherwise I’d say Fanning/Blunt/Close/Hall are all done.
Tony Kim: Love music questions so not random for me lol
ATM I would say:
Paramore
1. Ain't it Fun ( Best Surprise Grammy for Rock Win Ever)
2. Decode
3. That's What You Get
4. This is Why
5. crushcrushcrush
Weezer
1. Pork and Beans
2. All my Favourite Songs (that Grammy nomination was fully deserved)
3. Hash Pipe
4. Say It Ain't So
5. Buddy Holly
My Chemical Romance
1. Welcome to the Black Parade
2. Helena
3. Teenagers
4. Na Na Na
5. I'm Not Okay (I Promise)
Well, Sentimental Value made PGA. As someone who's pretty meh on the film overall I'm happy at least one international film has made a bit of a bounce back and that Lilleaas is in a good position. Gonna be honest and say I have absolutely no interest in seeing F1 (though on the note of blockbusters I'd say Avatar and Wicked missing her basically spells RIP to their chances).
Also, I guess Lanthimos is now officially in the Academy darling's club.
Weapons getting a PGA nomination is certainly good news for Madigan but I'm not sure if I'll predict it for a Picture nomination just yet. F1 is likely a PGA-only thing, I'd predict Accident over it. And I think we can cross off Avatar (thank God) and Wicked: For Good now.
Louis: ratings for the cast of Is This Thing On?
Luke:
Due to the extended period before the actual ceremony my plan is to hit more 2025 films first, then watch more of the recommendations during that time.
Hudson - (Previously have not been the biggest fan of Hudson even in her lauded performances but thought she found the right path with this one. As even the Wisconsin accent which I thought would be grating or false, she makes just a natural part of the character and one where we are granted the sense of someone from a very distinctive place and even more so a distinctive life. Hudson brings forth this certain innate desperation initially mixed with an optimism and importantly the passion within her performance scenes. I was surprised how Hudson even in the theoretically more warm scenes you sense that you need to find happiness as a constant even when nearing the happiness, and that need being more intense than just a general hope. Earning for me then where she goes later and delivering on the specific two notes of just a malaise towards everything or random suspicion. I didn’t feel either note was forced but rather a natural realization of that desperation from earlier taking over in multiple ways. Now also does deliver on the joy, particularly in every performance scene where she has wonderful chemistry with Jackman both on and off the stage. Where you can easily sense the connection between them, and particularly that mutual appreciation of music. Now Hudson won’t be in my top five, but as sort of the traditional Oscar role, I thought she was quite good.)
Anderson - (Thought she managed to avoid the pitfalls of such a role in either overplaying the moodiness or falling into just vagueness. Instead I found she hit a believable note of creating an actual sense of the gradual change towards Jackman’s character that felt earned. Because she doesn’t do it right away, nor is it about this big swing, rather there is this gradual changing of just finding comfort with Jackman’s character and was glad there was no big random moment, and when they do have a moment to confirm their connection, I liked how there was both warmth but still a natural distance between them.)
ahmeed:
I’d move Sutherland up to a 4.
Wright’s direction is easily his best for any film as he seems to come at the angle of the oft told story with a combination of a certain precision of the text and an elevation of the text in a very specific way, in the realization of the environment. Often there is kind of an expectation for the atmosphere of a classic literature piece, but Wright artfully plays around with that, and uses that atmosphere, particularly with Darcy’s two declarations of love, to fundamentally amplify the idea of the scene. Beyond those great moments, there is just a natural sense of finding the path around particular scenes to make them more tangible and even visceral how it emphasizes Elizabeth’s perspective in certain moments without resorting to gimmick. I’m not sure what’s the disconnect in his later work, but his style here feels so natural to the material, where his later work does indeed more often feel like flash for the sake of it.
A:
Well a quick rundown. Bower managed to up his creepy routine effectively in his playing towards the children, while effectively switching on a dime to a full psychopath and most importantly even pulling off the moments of his own emotional desperation and vulnerabilities. Keery’s still charming though not dealing with his best material, made use of when he had a bit more. Harbour even with the most tired material still brought gravitas and emotional conviction. Matarazzo I felt managed to successfully switch to the more emotional Dustin effectively, particularly in his bigger scenes actually showing the level of trauma. Heaton maybe had his best season honestly because I thought he played less of the moody note, finding some actual life to himself in his pivotal scene with Dyer and even more so better sold the emotional moment of Schnapp than Schnapp himself. Though Gelman’s shtick got more tired again this time. Wolfhard I thought fluctuated between some decent moments and moments where he seemed done with the series like last season. McLaughlin mostly had repetitive material but felt he was consistent with what he had. Sink I thought was mostly good but there were some moments of overemphasis with Nell Fisher scenes. Speaking of Fisher I thought did a lot as a late entry, finding a moving combination between naive innocence and petrifying fear. Adding to that though some genuine nuance in the character having her own emotional growth within the plot. Brown I think is Tye Sheridan at this point, as the more she can’t play into sort of broken detached intensity the less convincing she is, and here needing to play Eleven at her most socially connected, she in turn ironically feels her least natural. Hawke still brought her energy and charm though didn’t have too much to work with. Dyer continued to be pretty bland though I thought she was fine with Heaton. Ryder seemed more lost than her character was meant to be I think, and seemed like she didn’t know why she was still in the series or at least was done with it. Hamilton was a complete waste of a casting playing just the most basic “I’m a no nonsense badass” the entire time. Schnapp who I actually did like in previous seasons, seemingly took the wrong lessons, as the moment of opening of the flood gates and instead of playing the desperation towards something else, instead overloaded on it playing with such melodramatic choices every time and to such an extreme each time that he came off a little ridiculous.
Anonymous:
Arnett - 3
Dern - 3
Day - 2
Cooper - 2
Sedaris - 2.5
Ebersole - 2.5
Hinds - 3
Radcliffe - 2.5
Jensen - 2
Regarding PGA:
I'd say that is a pretty clear top eight now, and an important get for Sentimental Value on all fronts. With also important boosts for Train Dreams and Bugonia which were also backed by BAFTA.
That leaves F1 and Weapons both that have a boxoffice narrative that PGA likes, so I think F1 almost definitely misses for another non-English contender, Weapons maybe makes it but I wouldn't be surprised if it misses like A Quiet Place did. My best guess for the I'm Still Here and Nickle Boys type replacements would be The Secret Agent and It was Just An Accident.
Oh, and I can VERY easily live with that set of nominees.
Yeah, I'm locking the same in as my Best Picture predictions.
2025, pretty great year for the Oscars I think.
Yeah, I'm almost disappointed in myself of how much overlap will be on my ballot with the Academy's. Now what will I complain about? (And don't say the state of the rest of the world, that's just a given.)
I feel as though the typical Academy embrace of international films, alongside current events/rhetoric should definitely translate into more love for them come nominations morning. Got to have a few things to be optimistic about lol
Louis: Your thoughts on this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pY-0JfEdLY
Louis: Thoughts on the cast of Train Dreams and Wake Up Dead Man.
I was definitely expecting a lot more love for international films this year and have been pretty disappointed on that front. Still, at least there's the OBAA sweep that I can rely on to be excited about.
Sorry for becoming the resident crank on here through what has been a relatively chill awards season.
Calvin: It’s usually me who’s the crank, so thanks for taking it off my shoulders this year
Louis: Your thoughts on this original song for the Tony Awards? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeOy1WKeTRY
Louis: Do you think Infiniti would be in win contention had she stayed in Supporting?
Post a Comment