Wednesday, 3 December 2025

Alternate Best Actor 2004: Paddy Considine in Dead Man's Shoes

Paddy Considine did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Richard in Dead Man’s Shoes.

Dead Man’s Shoes follows a man returning to his hometown to seek revenge for the mistreatment of his younger intellectually challenged brother Anthony (Toby Kebbell). 

The underrated Paddy Considine, though that seems likely it might finally be changing somewhat, has a most unusual role here both as a leading man and as the specifics of the role unravel/realize itself. As if you were to hear the basic description of the film you’d think Richard is a hero who is set to go about seeking a righteous revenge against those who wronged his brother, however you’d be dead wrong to take that view. The film takes an atypical approach as in a way it is as frequently from the perspectives of the idiotic villains who are sorta a gang, but more accurately a group of half wits who hang around in a small town. They in a way are granted frequently the more traditional human perspective, despite being obviously flawed morons, as the story unfolds. Considine on the other hand enters the film a bit like a pale rider as we see him walking with purpose towards the town. Considine’s physicality being key to the entirety of his work, as a fundamental brilliant choice. Considine’s march here is fascinating as the way he walks so enclosed within himself, yet so distinctly there is an innate intensity about it, even as Considine performs it with an ease where you don’t even second guess it. Considine presenting in just this walk a man with a mission, a man in a certain headspace and the history of the man who had just obviously come out of the army having seen more than a few things in his life. 

The first action of his Richard is to enter the local pub, seemingly with his brother in tow, where he comes across Herbie, one of the least impressive of the impressive crew who comes into the bar. Considine’s stare down towards the man is the start of honestly one of the most terrifying performances I’ve seen which subverts many expectations because one he’s our theoretical hero and two what he technically is doing seemingly is right, yet how it proceeds ends up feeling wrong. Even in this as Herbie tries to play the tough guy by asking “What are you looking at”, Considine’s brilliant delivery of more than a rabid dog, rather a dog whose already sinking his teeth into a man’s jugular, of “you yah cunt” doesn’t just put the man at unease it puts us at unease as well. Considine sunken within his army uniform, and the wild eyed look that doesn’t lose a bit of his intensity as the man slinks away like a dog, fashions a kind of outsider of a figure, one that you’d pass by randomly in the less ideal part of a neighborhood, someone you know is dangerous and don’t want to have much to do with. This man though is a “hero” though, even as Considine plays with this notion again and again, in ways that knocks us off any easy sense of comfort just as it does with the men he is coming to terrorize. 

After the exchange there’s a hint of a demented glee in Considine’s eyes, but not something that gives you any more comfort, even if there is the sense of a game of Richard. Something that we get quickly finds more layers to when Richard goes to the same man with an apology, where Considine performs it as a seemingly less harmful mentally not quite there man. Considine putting on the front for a moment though even within that there is this chaotic quality just beneath the surface of the act that denotes even this as part of the game to play with the men. Where we see Considine observing the men the danger of him becomes all the more evident, where there is an intention in his eyes, and even more this disturbing calm of a man conducting a specific military operation. The group of idiots eventually figure out who Richard is and their de facto leader Sonny (Gary Stretch) decides to take some kind of action against him. The first major confrontation scene being Sonny going up to Richard and trying to intimidate him. Considine is outstanding in this scene in the specific energy he creates where he takes disrespect to new levels as he barely looks at him. As Sonny tries to be the tough guy and I just adore Considine’s way of “taking in” the threats with the least serious essentially “oh you’re a big guy” disregard for every threat. There’s more though as Considine is basically burning from the inside out with his real intention barely something he can hold in. When he notes he's not threatening, Considine just speaks truth in a way violent promises are rarely made through a performance. 

Considine’s clap back scene should be legendary as clap backs go, from just his way of indicating that Sonny is in his hand where Considine implements his intensity with such a ferocious specificity. Before then finally turning to Sonny and letting him know exactly what he will do. Considine brings the searing rage into every word of his insults to Sonny and you see more than anger, there is a fundamental hatred, however a hatred of the man as though he sees him as just filth he will be cleaning up soon enough. Something that quickly realizes itself as the idiots attempt to later confront him with some actual weapons, where Considine’s performance is just dismissive towards them even when they’re aiming a gun his way. Considine weaponizes the disrespect still towards the men, but within the action the glimpses of Richard’s insanity. As walks towards them welcoming any attack from them with a complete calm. Considine’s eyes are of a man in so many ways around the bend, and with that psychotic intensity, even if it is technically towards men who are seemingly deserving of this treatment. Where we take the next step in Richard’s plan and he goes for his revenge directly, and we find out what Richard is truly capable of. 

But before that throughout the film we have various moments where Richard is spending time with Anthony away from the situation. Moments where they seem to reflect back on their lives and even just casually being with one another. Considine makes the absolute most of these scenes because while Considine is calm in a scary way in other scenes, here we see a man with some genuine calm in terms of his soul. Considine brings such a natural warmth in these moments where he speaks to Kebbell in a specific loving, wistful but also haunted way. Within the conversations Considine’s performance still has a weight of it, though here the weight of memory. His delivery has actual loving sense in it and you get the glimpse of a man appreciating life if just for a bit. Considine finds such a natural balance and poignancy in these moments however because he sets up the twist within them, while also hiding it. Which is that Anthony is dead before the film begins and Richard is talking to no one. What Considine shows in these scenes then still is the same demented state, but really the purer motivation of that state. As Considine is quietly heartbreaking in showing the quiet sincerity of what Richard did get out of the relationship with his brother, and more specifically why stripping that from him would be so fundamentally cruel. I love that Considine in no way makes it this perfect relationship, the differences between the two are still fundamental, but regardless it was pivotal for Richard’s connection to humanity. 

Speaking of a lack of humanity, we follow Richard as he’s drugged the main members of the crew who were supposedly preparing to go kill Richard but are instead left in a daze. The sudden appearance of Considine among them is honestly terrifying when you see the intention in his eyes as Richard is nearly done playing with food and is ready to chomp down. There is visceral brutality within Considine’s work where he is unsettling just watch as he maneuvers around the scene more so as a personification of death stalking his next target. Within that we have a different side as he dispatches each man. Starting with Sonny where Considine shows the most blunt brutality of it all and there is the manner of the man as though he is just disposing of garbage he casually bags the man’s head before shooting him dead. When another of the men is dazed trying to leave in fear, Considine is unnerving in the rabid way he does grant the man leave, leave to die and the complete lack of hesitation within Considine’s work makes Richard horrifying despite technically killing bad men. This leaves only Herbie, and Considine somehow is even more off-putting as he smiles and puts on a little charm to pry information on the remaining member of the gang. Considine’s delivery is horrifying as the sense of the danger is ever present as even his “kind” way of speaking each word you see in his eyes that he is just letting the man on. Even showing the man another of his victims so matter-of-factly Considine emphasizes every bit of psychological torture to perfection. We see a man utterly in control in a way that as much as these were horrible men, Considine makes the vengeance as disturbing as their crimes. Particularly when Herbie is done telling him the info and Richard gives him a bit of hope saying he’d let him live. The switch in Considine from the fake smile to unbridled rage as he dispatches the man is such a chilling realization of Richard’s specific insanity. 

With all the men dead Richard seeks the final man, Mark, who unlike the other men has not only moved on to start a family, but we see that Mark is a regretful onlooker who is filled with shame for what he was part of and failed to stop. And if somehow we were comfortable with our violent “hero” the rest of the film, the greatest challenge comes as we see Richard trying to prompt the man towards his own death. We even have a moment where he mocks Anthony seemingly to get Mark to mock him with him to enact the final step of his plan, however Mark stands firm in his regrets. Considine is truly amazing as we see Richard now unravel as he speaks of the situation openly to the man even admitting to becoming the monster to enact his vengeance. A careful contrast to a late brief flashback where we see Richard attending Anthony’s funeral, and Considine makes the most of the silent moment as you see such simple sadness in a lonely man. Contrasting what that sadness led to as we see Richard now wholly deranged, where Considine is all too believable in the wildly intense swings between his rage, sadness, shame and even self-hatred as he prompts Mark to kill him instead. Considine makes this moment heartbreaking and horrifying because every emotion is as natural as the next, but all in this complete mess where the man’s anguish has never been more tangible. Considine reveals the best and worst of Richard in this terrible dance of the man’s face as he’s racked with guilt, yet wholly broken by it all. Considine portrait of revenge is truly unlike any other. Where we have the qualities of the cool or badass hero. He is a badass, he has that violent calm many attribute to your usual revenge seeking hero. His intensity is equal to so many characters many often would find cool. What Considine does though is tip it that much further to create such a disturbing yet wholly human sense of the festering emotions and real psychotic rage needed for a man to take such a dark and unforgiving path. A performance of such visceral power which never sugarcoats any notion, instead forces you into a place of fear just to witness him. 

117 comments:

Luke Higham said...

The wait's finally over. :)

Louis: Any upgrades.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Yeah, I gotta see this at some point.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

"Yeah, well he was an embarrassment to me" is an all-timer line delivery. Phenomenal performance.

Matt Mustin said...

A searing, unforgettable performance. It also should be said that this would probably be my ensemble win if it weren't for Nobody Knows.

Kevin said...

One of the most visceral performances I have seen in awhile, what are your thoughts on the rest of the cast?

Also on the topic of Tarantino's comments towards Dano, that and the Matthias Schoenaerts news just re-establishes my firm belief that the art and artist should always be viewed as separate entities as best as possible. Of course that is easier said than done

RatedRStar said...

Love this film and performance, cheers me up from looking at my Spotify Wrapped earlier lol, how can so many songs I liked not be in my top 100 lol.

Marcus said...

Louis: Your top 5 Considine performances and thoughts on the direction and ending of this film.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Excellent review, but I think the penultimate paragraph ends on an incomplete sentence, "With all the men dead."

8000S said...

Louis: Watching Queen Christina again just makes you appreciate Garbo's acting talent and beauty more and more.

Speaking of Garbo, I ponder how she would have done as Lady Macbeth. Now that's a role she would have been fantastic in.

Tybalt said...

Louis: Thoughts and ratings on the cast of It Was Just an Accident?

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: Regarding A Little Prayer, my understanding is that it premiered at Sundance in '23 but was released theatrically this year, and thus would be eligible as a '25 film by your rules. I've noticed IMDB has listed a 2023 limited release date, but my research indicates that it was merely the originally planned date before a deal with SPC broke down and Music Box eventually picked up the film. Would you consider watching the film earlier now with this information?

Calvin Law said...

Great review of an amazing performance - my personal win as well. My prediction for the final top 10:

1. Cruise
2. Considine
3. Yagira
4. Murray
5. Ganz
6. Pegg
7. Leung
8. Bardem
9. Carrey
10. Bacon

Tim said...

RatedRStar: THAT'S your problem? MY MUSICAL AGE IS 36!

Perfectionist said...

My prediction for the final 10:
1) Cruise
2) Considine
3) Murray
4) Ganz
5) Yagira
6) Carrey
7) Leung
8) Bardem
9) Pegg
10) Bacon

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Tim: Mine is 73...oy.

RatedRStar said...

MY MUSICAL AGE IS 60! are 60 year olds really listening to My Chemical Romance, Weezer and Paramore????

Shaggy Rogers said...

I confess I've never quite managed to fall in love with Considine's performance like many of you have. His acting always reminds me of Laurence Olivier, apathetic and grumpy in Wuthering Heights and Rebecca.

Hopefully Cruise will keep his position.

Shaggy Rogers said...

My prediction:
1. Cruise
2. Considine
3. Ganz
4. Yagira
5. Murray
6. Pegg
7. Leung
8. Bardem
9. Carrey
10. Bacon

Luke Higham said...

I really didn't expect Giamatti to go up to a 5.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Could you re-watch Spider-Man 2, The Prisoner Of Azkaban and The Incredibles before you finish Lead.

Tybalt said...

I think his top 10 will be:
Cruise
Yagira
Considine
Leung
Ganz
Murray
Bardem
Carrey
Giamatti
Bacon

Michael McCarthy said...

I have to say I’m kind of hoping Cruise is dethroned this year. In my ideal outcome it’ll go to Leung, Carrey or Yagira.

Perfectionist said...

Michael: My ideal outcome is Carrey.... But I think Cruise's brilliant atypical turn, makes for a perfect win.

Matt Mustin said...

I'm fine with Cruise keeping the win. He wouldn't be my choice, but he's amazing and in my top 5.

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding Hamnet, Having had a certain musical piece being used here spoiled for me, in the context if I had been overused, I will say the moment I heard it begin all I could think was “NOPE” as the film came to a magnificent close. But as cathartic as the ending is, the film earns the moment in its ethereal yet at times bluntly real depiction of the relationship of William and Agnes Shakespeare. Which is emotionally fraught, yet never for me was overwhelmed by the careful balance Zhao crafts by also depicting the beauty of life and those moments of joy. Although there are plot beats, particularly in the establishment of the central relationship (and honestly the moments where it tries to more verbally detail Agnes as some kind of "forest witch" I found the weakest and probably would be my only minor criticism of the film), the film is built on more so the emotional experience of these people, which in that sense it cuts deeply, painfully, but also poignantly.

Buckley - 5(Big surprise I know)
Watson - 4
Alwyn - 4
Wilmot - 3
Lynes - 3.5
Breathnach - 3.5
Noah Jupe - 4

Robert MacFarlane said...

It's kind of weird how Alwyn has become a traditionally handsome character actor that's a good luck charm to prestige films.

I can't wait for Jacobi Jupe's review. That kid hit me HARD.

Harris Marlowe said...

I could be wrong, but if anyone can dethrone Cruise, I'll say it's Leung or Yagira.

Marcus said...

Based on the praise in this review, I'd say Considine is #2 minimum. Amazing year for lead actor, that Ganz, Carrey might not even be in the top 5.

Marcus said...

Based on the praise in this review, I'd say Considine is #2 minimum. Amazing year for lead actor, that Ganz, Carrey might not even be in the top 5.

8000S said...

Louis: Oh, and uh, what do you think of this cast for a Japanese Seven Days in May?

Toshiro Mifune in Lancaster's role
Tatsuya Nakadai in Douglas' role
Takashi Shimura in March's role
Machiko Kyo in Gardner's role
Daisuke Kato in O'Brien's role
Susumu Fujita in Balsam's role

Luke Higham said...

10 fives overall for Buckley at 35 years old is astonishing.

Emi Grant said...

Alright, Mr. Morgan... nowhere to hide now

*cocks gun*

Tell us... Stone or Buckley? (and if you can, how do you think they compare and measure up to each other based on their talents and strengths?)

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa

RatedRStar said...

RIP Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Do you still intend to review The Aviator and Million Dollar Baby before finalizing the lead results?

Shaggy Rogers said...

RIP Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Do you still intend to re-watch The Aviator and Million Dollar Baby before finalizing the lead results?

Luke Higham said...

RIP Warner Bros

Tim said...

R.I.P. Cinema itself, you had a decent run

Anonymous said...

Louis, thoughts on the Critics Choice nominations.

And thoughts on Netflix buying Warner Bros.

Anonymous said...

Do you guys find it alarming that the set of nominees for best picture is… bad?
I still haven’t seen five of them (Wicked, Marty Supreme, Hamnet, Jay Kelly, Bugonia). I hope they’ll be good (especially MS and hamnet) but what I’ve seen so far is meh.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I’d move Stretch up to a 4 as well.

Anonymous:

Sullivan - 2(A performance that suggests talent but just isn’t utilized effectively. She instead begins at a nearly screeching note and continues on the screeching note. So when she cries out it just feels repetitive at a certain point, and almost gets comical. There’s no nuance within the extreme making the extreme just over the top. The emotion feels so enforced and never does it feel like genuinely losing realization itself through hysterics. It also doesn’t help when you have to act in such silly scenes such as staring forwards while splattered with someone else’s blood, as an attempt to show “she’s in shock” but instead just seems ridiculous).

Mobasseri - 3.5(There’s a decent foundation in this performance where he gets the average life of the man early on to create some degree of grounding, which then instantly shifts to an intense emotional drive. The problem is the film weirdly puts him off to a backseat as he defers to everyone else in the situation, making it so that starting drive slowly becomes diluted over time. It is a good performance, but the promise of the premise of the performance begins in a far more compelling way than where it ends up.)

Afshari - 4(I got the most out of her performance where I felt we got a better sense of who she was outside of the circumstances, in her manner where initially dealing with this problem is just some nagging noise, before she reveals a greater anguish that we see the way she’s pushed it down, before building towards a release of it. So her rage does feel very real and with a greater sense of depth where it reveals more of her character as we witness it.)

Louis Morgan said...


Azizi - 3(Hardly pulling a Ben Kingsley here in terms of playing into different ambiguities of the character and forcing the viewer to struggle to ascertain his guilt. Instead he feels like a fairly thin character leading up to his big emotional scene which felt fairly surface level than something deeper and more disturbing.)

Pakbaten - 3(Fine but didn’t really make much of an impression for me either way.)

Elyasmehr - 2.5(Pure rage is an especially difficult note to pull off though in the right performance can be truly powerful, or just a bunch of hot air. Sadly this was one where the rage just felt surface level as performed and became symbolic rage, rather than understanding someone’s pain that is also a form of symbolic rage.)

Kevin:

I believe I’ve given them before.

Marcus:


1. Dead Man’s Shoes
2. House of the Dragon
3. A Room For Romeo Brass
4. Journeyman
5. MobLand

Meadows’s direction very much is one where the theoretical weaknesses play into the strength of the film. As the almost camcorder quality of the approach to the film makes the experience of the film particularly tangible and visceral. Particularly as he portrays the state of the villains with this particularly casual atmosphere that feels very believable as essentially a group of drinking buddies who unfortunately take everything a step too far. So when Richard’s plan goes into place, the switch over is that much more disconcerting because everything has felt so natural, that the matter of fact way he goes about the more violent acts are just as natural but in turn most disconcerting because of that. The casual depiction of Considine in the gas mask, suddenly at the drug induced party that starts as silly foolishness that turns to brutal murders, amplifies the specific horror brilliantly. Meadows contrasts that with the black and white sequences that are more formal memory as like true crime, combined with the use of a more operatic score of presenting that dramatically as crime. The contrast for me effectively creating the sense of the fundamental past against the messiness of the future.

The ending is kind of a point of contention, where it perhaps doesn’t live up to the unexpectedness of the rest of the film, though aided of course by performance. It’s one where I think the ending makes sense for the film, does work well enough, but isn’t an ending that kind of elevates the film to even greater height like truly great endings do.

Shaggy:

I’m done watching Million Dollar Baby.

Emi Grant:

Buckley, ever so slightly, though Stone for me still has the highest height between them via Poor Things. The primary reason why is that it is slightly more difficult to see Stone in Buckley’s roles in War & Peace, Chernobyl or Hamnet. Where she utilizes modesty as a pivotal aspect of the performance, whereas I could see Buckley certainly as Abigail but even as Bella Baxter, and she’s one of the few actors of their age group other than Stone who I could see pull it off. Now would she be *as* good as Stone was in that role, maybe or maybe not. Having said that though, I do think Stone does have a slightly greater innate star presence, and perhaps comedic sensibilities, though again part of that is the degree each has been tested. And notable of both I do not think we’ve seen all either have to offer, and it is quite possible Stone would knock out a completely introverted modest role, and Buckley would a fully comedic star turn.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Well of course.

Japanese Seven Days, all ideal choices for each.

Harris:

If it is indeed 25, I'll check it out at some point.

Anonymous:

Typical Oscar predictions from them.

Not good, potentially taking such a large studio and placing it purely for Netflix will be a great disservice to theaters.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Do you find it odd that BAFTA's nominations are 5 days after the Oscars.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Going back to the old days I guess, and will make the actual nods harder to predict without seeing the BAFTA perspective first. I honestly don't mind.

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: Thoughts on the acting in these clips?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Cbv8yXxMTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQCqmyvqfzQ

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I know this maybe uncomfortable conversation for some but with Supporting Actor, who's more likely to upset (I won't say steal because you haven't seen either yet) Elordi for the 5th spot, Adam Sandler or Kevin O'Leary (Marty Supreme).

Matt Mustin said...

Luke: Is O'Leary in the conversation?

Harris Marlowe said...

Matt: I personally haven't seen anyone predict him, not sure why Luke brought him up instead of (say) Lindo.

Luke Higham said...

Matt: I've heard he's been getting a strong amount of praise along with Odessa A'zion and Gwyneth Paltrow and if Marty Supreme performs extremely well at the Globes and SAG then he could cause an upset. If Elordi fails to get SAG then I'd be greatly concerned for his chances.

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding Jay Kelly. Noah Baumbach is really excited to let you know he's seen Bergman and Fellini movies, in his most "produced" work in a film that probably needed the most honesty to make it work. Instead it feels aggressively glossy in its presentation but worse is just how hollow it is in its explorations. Everything is not built on finding believable people interacting, instead it is the most basic setup and the most basic observations.

Dern - 2.5
Crudup - 3
Keough - 3.5
Edwards - 2.5
Keach - 3
Broadbent - 2.5
Gerwig - 2
Wilson - 2
Rohrwacher - 2
Mortimer - 2
Rowe - 2.5
Partridge - 2

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Crudup, Keough, Keach, Broadbent and Gerwig.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Luke: It might be best for the MS publicity team to distance themselves from O'Leary as much as possible.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

O'Leary even if he is great, I don't think has a chance at a nomination. Sandler could happen, if Jay Kelly becomes some sort of "old school" player that gets some minor momentum (I don't think it will be big no matter what, but I could see it be like a Nyad.).

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: Is Sandler Lead or Supporting for you?

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

Definitely supporting.

Kevin said...

Rip to the future of cinema... this Netflix Warner deal is really worrying, talk about destroying what makes the cinema-going experience special

Matt Mustin said...

Kevin: I guess I get what you're saying, but first of all, people have been saying "This is going to kill movies" about various things for centuries, and also Paramount would've been much worse.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Yeah, keep in mind Paramount is currently mounting a blacklist. A complete monopoly from them is worst case scenario for mainstream entertainment.

Kevin said...

Matt & Robert:
Actually agreed that David Ellison and Paramount woulda been waaay worse, but I guess its just my dislike of this whole "streamification" direction and my worry that more and more films that deserve their time and a proper run on the big screen might just get shoved straight to streaming after a few days. (Had no chance to see Frankenstein in cinemas where im from, although tbf I still loved it even viewing at home). And I'm also all for it if that means Netflix giving smaller filmmakers their chances with films like Train Dreams

Shaggy Rogers said...

You know, when this kind of situation happens, I wonder what the great personalities of cinema from the past would do in these situations?

- How would the founders Louis B. Mayer, Darryl F. Zanuck, Harry Cohn, David O. Selznick or the four Warner brothers deal with the issue of streaming services with their studios?

- Would those Hollywood blacklist directors like Orson Welles, John Cassavetes or Michael Cimino agree to release their films on streaming services as a form of revenge against the studios?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

To offer you a little break from current controversies, I have finished watching The Batman animated series from 2000s. Now this is clearly a cartoon that reeks of era it was made in, as it definitely is oriented more towards younger audience and selling t...I mean, aiming for action instead of layered storytelling, but still with some deeper dives into its world from time to time. It also introduces some rather big changes to the estabilished cast of characters from designs to writing, which some people like a lot and some...well, REALLY don't. The end result is a show that feels quite interesting and cool when at its best and pretty shallow and bad when it misses the mark. Bottom line, if you're a DCAU purist who loves "definitive" takes on Batman mythos, then run for the hills. If you're willing to explore a fresh take however, then give this one a shot. I personally found it to be better compared to average Beware the Batman and very mediocre Caped Crusader.

1. Kevin Michael Richardson - 4
2. Glenn Shadix
3. Rino Romano (a better Batman than I initally remembered)
4. Steve Harris
5. Dan Castellaneta
6. Jason Marsden
7. Robert Englund
8. Tom Kenny
9. Evan Sabara
10. Patrick Warburton
11. Alastair Duncan - 3.5
12. Ming-Na Wen
13. Wallace Langham
14. Hayden Welch
15. Ron Perlman
16. Peter MacNicol
17. Gina Gershon
18. Mark Hamill
19. Jeff Bennett
20. Clancy Brown
21. Brandon Routh
22. Danielle Judovits
23. Jim Cummings
24. Frank Gorshin
25. Phil LaMarr
26. Patton Oswalt
27. Miguel Ferrer
28. Adam West
29. James Remar - 3
30. Edward James Olmos
31. Will Friedle
32. Joaquim de Almeida
33. Mitch Pileggi - 2.5
34. Udo Kier - 2 (so you cast him only to give him 1 line? Bravo)

Anonymous said...

Hi guys, how do feel about DDL missing in the critics awards? is it bad?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: His hopes already died with the film's muted response.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Shouldn't surprise anyone, I almost adored every bit of Hamnet.

Buckley - 5 (will be a PHENOMENAL winner)
Mescal - 5
Jacobi Jupe - 5
Noah Jupe - 4
Watson - 4 (she knocked out that monologue)
Alwyn - 4

Luke Higham said...

Louis: This is a list of leading Performances to watch before posting your final ranking.
Timothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme
Lee Byung-Hun in No Other Choice
Josh O'Connor in Wake Up Dead Man, The Mastermind, Rebuilding and The History Of Sound
Sope Dirisu in My Father's Shadow
Frank Dillane in Urchin
Jeremy Allen White in Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere
Brendan Fraser in Rental Family
Paul Mescal in The History Of Sound
Jonathan Majors in Magazine Dreams
David Strathairn in A Little Prayer
Nick Offerman and Jacob Tremblay in Sovereign
Harry Melling in Pillion
Ben Whishaw in Peter Hujar's Day
Billy Zane in Waltzing With Brando
Diego Luna and Tonatiuh in Kiss Of The Spider Woman
Scoot McNairy in Fairyland
Jorma Tommila in Sisu: Road To Revenge
Miles Teller in Eternity
Mads Mikkelsen in Dust Bunny
Will Arnett in Is This Thing On?
Tom Waits and Adam Driver in Father Mother Sister Brother
Everett Blunck and Kayo Martin in The Plague
Hugh Jackman in Song Sung Blue

And For Supporting:
Keanu Reeves in Good Fortune
Ethan Hawke in Black Phone 2

Michael McCarthy said...

For anyone interested, here are my acting top fives for the year so far:

Actress:
1. Byrne
2. Reinsve
3. Buckley
4. Grande
5. Stone (I’ve rewatched Bugonia, a lot of it improved for me but I definitely still have big reservations)

Actor:
1. Plemons
2. Jordan
3. Skarsgård
4. Mescal
5. DiCaprio

Supporting Actress:
1. Infiniti
2. Lilleaas
3. Anderson
4. Mosaku
5. Blunt

Supporting Actor
1. Lindo/Penn/Del Toro (For the life of me I haven’t been able to settle on a ranking yet)
4. O’Connell
5. Jupe

Anonymous said...

I still have it as a no guts no glory prediction that Leo gets snubbed yet again, recently he seems to have that effect.

Perfectionist said...

I'm going on a limb, to say that DiCaprio wins the Oscar in fact. for a film, with such an epic scale. I think it could possibly be an Oppenheimer kinda sweep at the top.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Michael:

Actor

1. Skarsgärd
2. Edgerton
3. DiCaprio
4. honestly, Tatum
5. Mescal

Actress

1. Buckley/Reinsve/Byrne (need to decide)
4. Lawrence
5. Stone

Supporting Actor

1. Elordi
2. Jupe
3. Penn
4. Hoult
5. Ehrenreich

Supporting Actress

1. Madigan
2. Lilleaas
3. Dunst
4. Taylor
5. Hall

Matt Mustin said...

Perfectionist: I think it's a safe bet that he'll win, at this juncture anyway.

Michael McCarthy said...

Idk why I wasn’t thinking of Teyana Taylor, she’d be third in supporting actress for me

Calvin Law said...

My personal top 5’s for now:

Actor
1. Moura
2. Lee
3. Dìrísù
4. Dillane
5. DiCaprio

Actress (still need to see Sentimental Value and Hamnet)
1. Byrne
2. Infiniti
3. Tompa
4. Hawkins
5. Melliti

Supporting Actor
1. Fiennes
2. del Toro
3. Rahim
4. O’Connell
5. Lindo

Supporting Actress
1. Afshari
2. Yeom
3. Taylor
4. Comer
5. Abela

Anonymous said...

Calvin: Cool to see Fiennes at number for you. He is glorious!!

Anonymous said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the casts of Predator: Badlands and Kiss of the Spider Woman.

Anonymous said...

Calvin: ratings for the Sentimental Value cast?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on LAFCA.

Harris Marlowe said...

If both Clooney and Sandler aren't nominated, there's a good chance all ten of the male acting nominees will get 5's from Louis. And wouldn't that be the first time that's ever happened?

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: Have you read Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth and if you have do you think it could be adapted in any way?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Byrne won the critics triad. I think we can pencil her in safely now.

Tony Kim said...

Not quite, we still have NSFC coming up.

Calvin Law said...

So happy for Byrne, god that performance is otherworldly amazing.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous:

Reinsve: 3.5
Skarsgard: 3.5 (holy fucking category fraud man, is this the worst we’ve seen in awhile?)
Lilleaas: 5
Fanning: 3
Danielsen Lie: 2.5
Loven: 3
Christensen: 3

Tybalt said...

Louis: Just to make 100% sure, do you consider Mescal a lead in Hamnet?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Mescal is lead, and would have slot into the Lead Actor lineup effortlessly with the material he has (although it is Buckley's show through and through).

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on Notting Hill as a film, and Grant & Roberts in it?

Calvin Law said...

I will say the silver lining of so much category fraud is that it's been making room for Wagner Moura this season, who might not have been a priority for NEON otherwise.

Tony Kim said...

I finished The Crown S1 recently. Overall, good if decidedly inconsistent. It was at its most compelling when being a character study about Elizabeth, showing how she deals with her new responsibilities and how they affect her various relationships. The rest was a bit scattershot, and there's one plot point in the season finale I found really contrived (though Foy very nearly sells it).

1. Claire Foy - 4.5
2. John Lithgow
3. Jared Harris
4. Vanessa Kirby
5. Pip Torrens - 4
6. Matt Smith - 3.5 (Pretty limited role that he at least imbues with some charisma, though he got a bit grating by the last 2 episodes)
7. Victoria Hamilton
8. Stephen Dillane - 3
9. Alex Jennings - 2.5
10. Jeremy Northam

Found 7-10 to be just varying degrees of serviceable (thought they could've done more with Dillane in particular) and everyone who's unlisted just didn't leave that much of an impression. No truly bad performances, but a fair number of forgettable ones.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the voice of George Macready.

Anonymous said...

Louis, thoughts on the Globe nominations.

Anonymous said...

Calvin:

Could you please explain what you thought of Reinsve?

Perfectionist said...

Damn, kinda exciting lol. They got all the favorites in, like Lee, Edgerton and Moura. Doesn't rule out any of them so far.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Finally, the Golden Globes fully recognized the PTA.

J96 said...

I haven’t seen all of the films, so I don’t have a ranking yet, but to give my gut feelings on who I think will win

DRAMA - Hamnet
COMEDY - 1. Marty Supreme, 2. OBAA (though without Safdie in Director, it might be vice versa.)
DIRECTOR - 1. PTA, 2. Zhao, 3. Coogler
ACTOR DRAMA - 1. Moura, 2. MBJ
ACTOR COMEDY - 1. Chalamet, 2. DiCaprio
ACTRESS DRAMA - Buckley
ACTRESS COMEDY - 1. Byrne, 2. Infinity, 3. Stone
SONG - 1. I Lied to You, 2. Golden,
ANIMATED FEATURE - Kpop Demon Hunters
SCREENPLAY - 1. OBAA, 2. Hamnet
SUPP ACTOR - Mescal (Del Toro and Penn will likely cancel each other out.)
SUPP ACTRESS - 1. Taylor, 2. Grande (I think the film plus the lead/support argument helps her)

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

My "guesses" at this point:

Drama - Hamnet
Comedy/Musical - OBAA
Director - PTA
Drama Actor - Moura
Comedy Actor - DiCaprio
Drama Actress - Buckley
Comedy Actress - Byrne (although I think Infiniti might need a win here for the Oscar nomination)
Supporting Actor - del Toro/Skarsgård
Supporting Actress - Grande (although Wicked missing Comedy/Musical is quite surprising)

Matt Mustin said...

Naked Gun getting snubbed at the Globes is surprising and would be upsetting if I cared about them.

Anonymous said...

Luke, are there any Leading Actress performances that you would like for Louis to watch before posting his rankings.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'm sure there will be suggestions from others but Amanda Seyfried and Tessa Thompson stand out the most.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:


Crudup - (Honestly probably lower to a 2.5, as I found him just there for a scene, okay in his first scene of playing the awkwardness, but found him less believable when he was trying to play the bitterness more openly. Became more cartoony than real as someone living a life of bitterness and letting it out at this moment.)

Keough - (Working with some super cliches here consistently, with some really bad lines in there, but I least found her generally believable which is better than nothing I guess.)

Keach - (Nice to see him in something but barely gets to do much other than be the distant dad. Hits that note fine but really nothing to work with.)

Broadbent - (Found his approach slightly odd in playing the mentor director role, where the real sense of connection and history with Jay didn’t really feel tangible in his performance. Instead he came off as an only fashioned version of such a character.)

Gerwig - (Yeah I always prefer Gerwig behind the scenes and this is no different. Just very mannered as she usually is and fundamentally I rarely buy her in such a role.)

Anonymous:

One Battle, would need to fall off its frontrunner perch for any chance for DiCaprio to miss this time. With Don’t Look Up that film still did okay, but its final Oscar nominations tally showed it was losing momentum up till nomination day. For Killers, that also fell a little bit with its screenplay miss as well and his performance was far more divisive.

Anonymous:

Fanning - 4(I’ll give her credit for trying to spice things up whenever she has a line to bring a bit more character to it like the “good luck” line, or her intro moment. However the sort of wry attitude isn’t really in the character as written Fanning just seemed like she was trying to bring a bit more life to those moments. Which I’ll give her credit for successfully doing but in turn slightly disappointing in how the majority of her lines end up just selling the message in an overly obvious way again and again. Which I don’t think Fanning does poorly, there just seemed a more dynamic presence possible here. In her other performance she’s fine at just being cold but again wished there was more to the role than “the evil one”.)

Tonatiuh - 4(The version of Molina here is written far lighter, in terms of depicting his own flaws and his own situation. Something that I think makes the character far less interesting. Tonatiuh’s performance within that specific scheme of the character though I think works to an extent. He delivers an honest charisma in the role, and more so than Luna I think he is able to manage sort of the over the top elements of the fantasies with the more dramatic notions of reality. Now unfortunately the latter it feels like he could’ve gone further with but the direction/tone keeps him playing the lighter note. Particularly in terms of the character’s innate betrayal that is the starting point of the relationship, which seems like an afterthought here.)

Luna - 3.5(Again depicted with far more of as an idealized rebel than where Julia was playing a passionate man with a cause, but also a man with his own flaws. Luna is working with a heroic framework, which he handles with his own charisma and is more than fine in this limited work. He’s a bit lower for me because of his performance in the fantasy scenes where he’s a little stiff at times and seems to struggle to find the appropriate tone for the character.)

Lopez - 2.5(She’s not horrible, but her performance lacks the specific kind of magnetic quality to be this unbelievable “star”, that is so many things at once. Whoever played the part needed to be intangible in a way, and her presence was beyond human in a very specific sense. I’ll admit a tricky note to play, but regardless Lopez’s performance lacks something beyond. Instead she plays everything fairly straight as “I’m just doing a musical number”. Which she doesn’t do terribly but she’s not what this role needs.)

Louis Morgan said...


Bichir - 1.5(Just a brief role but found her managed to overact every single line he had. Where he came off as just this goofy character, in a role that needed a strict believability fitting the tone.)


Luke:


Prediction Wise:

One Battle is looking more and more to be PTA’s Oppenheimer or No Country.

Byrne is now cemented as the critical brass favorite, whether or not she wins NSFC (I’d be surprised if she didn’t), although one should not forget the fate of Marianne Jean-Baptise last year, though I don’t think that happens to Byrne. Though she is on shaky ground in the sense that on her film’s best day, she’s still the sole nominee, but given the category is unlikely to be filled up by actresses in major contenders she does feel very likely at this point.

Actor will not have a sweeper obviously and Hawke just needs to stay on the conversation in any way.

Supporting Actress: No sweeper either obviously so it will be interesting to see who takes the lead. Taylor seems viable given the strength of her film.

Supporting Actor: Important for Skarsgard to hit here to prevent Del Toro to become a sweeper, though the latter is still in a strong position. Side note, critics should be ashamed for just going along with studio fraud.

Quality Wise:

All for PTA just taking a victory lap. Byrne’s extremely deserving. I’ll certainly take Taylor as one of the options.

Matt:

I have, and I do think it could be adapted in terms of a director pulling it off, particularly someone with a strong stylistic vision. However, kind of getting the rights to pull it off so to speak seems far less likely.

Harris:

Notting Hill I don’t hate just find it slightly cloying as it hits some expected romcom beats from the mistaken identity situation albeit only briefly, a final over the top declaration, over the top sidekick friends and particularly here where the conflict seems a little forced. Both Grant and Roberts are playing into their then expected presence per the genre. Something I like well enough with Grant, and don’t care for with Roberts.

Louis Morgan said...


Tybalt:

Yes he’s lead.

Calvin:

To be fair, the Culkin/Saldana two punch was just last year. And supporting actress looks like it could be fully clean if Grande misses, and if she makes it that’s the only example there. Supporting actor is the worst since 2020 I suppose, with Odom, and somehow both Judas and the Black Messiah (which honestly that situation is what should’ve created a rule but alas we’re still here). Mescal and Skarsgard are unquestionable fraud, though I put Elordi in lead personally I wouldn’t qualify that as true fraud, and Penn to me is a true borderline where I think either placement is completely fair, and have no reservation placing him in supporting.

8000’s:

Classic regal quality that could be dignified or weaselly somehow without any direct change.

Anonymous:

Kind of a stage setting nomination list except for Avatar showing up almost nowhere (though I’ve heard claims that it wasn’t widely seen) and Wicked falling flat despite Erivo and Grande both making it. Notable that No Other Choice did so well with it showing up in Musical/Comedy and Lee getting in, which looking forward to seeing the film soon but that’s just cool to see him recognized.

Everyone who was expected to hit, hit essentially. No true surprises in terms of what seem like the “top five” except maybe Josh Safdie missing director, but again still got screenplay, picture and Chalamet so didn’t do horribly.

Actor:

Feels like a longlist, as I think everyone got in who seemingly had any chance.

Actress:

Same as actor.

Supporting Actress:

Blunt needed this, though I don’t think she and Johnson can last the whole season. Otherwise Hall and Mosaku missed, I think one of them probably is the spoiler, though the other five could easily be the final nominations.

Supporting Actor:

Seems like a logical final six (Lindo desperately needs SAG). I could see Andrew Scott maybe getting in at BAFTA (though given his snub for Strangers maybe not).

Calvin Law said...

Louis: oh, I didn't mean the year as a whole, I meant Skarsgard specifically is just one of those 'I can't really see how you can even make a case for fraud' for me. I haven't seen Mescal but I actually think Elordi is perfectly acceptable in Supporting (honestly I've considered putting him there despite the screentime), and Penn as well, not category fraud at all by any stretch.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: I thought Reinsve was good as she always was, particularly in her scenes with Lilleaas (which are the best of the film for me) and selling the general state of emotional mess and turmoil to her character, but I don't know, the way the film's general approach left me feeling a little distant prevented me from connecting with her and Skarsgard's performances beyond a certain point. Fully aware I'm in a definite minority here and I won't begrudge any awards love they get.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Aragorn being recast in Hunt For Gollum.

Tim said...

i mean, Viggo right now is older than Ian McKellan was during the Rings shoot

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I mean I'm far more concerned how they're going to make the story compelling in any way and not seem completely superfluous.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on Joe Keery's performance in the first season of Stranger Things?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Lucas: The moment I knew he was a star was when he jumped like four feet in the air over the bear trap in the living room.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: What's your take on the historical validity of the central thesis that Hamnet poses with regards to Shakespeare honoring his son through the play?

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: Unless it isn't playing anywhere near you, do you have any interest in seeing The Whole Bloody Affair?

And while we're on the subject of Shakespeare, your thoughts on the acting in these clips?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Cbv8yXxMTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQCqmyvqfzQ

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

A career making and character making performance. Where obviously Steve was designed to be the cliched jerk jock character. What Keery managed to do within the rather strict margins of that part was bring genuine charm and hints at nuance even when playing into the part of the guy interested in only one thing. Even when playing the jerk moments Keery carefully didn’t overplay it making even those moments play into a sense of honest insecurity within his more negatively inclined actions. Where you can see what the potential was to then give him the redemptive arc, where Keery’s performance of wanting to help clean up his vandalism has the necessary strict sincerity needed for the moment. Before we also get his being thrown into the supernatural, where Keery just brought a natural comedic edge that I think tiptoed the tone rather remarkably to set himself as the most engaging of the teenage characters.

Tahmeed:

I think there is obvious credibility to the theory, as Shakespeare changed the name of the character from Amleth in his adaptation. A character that personifies a youth struggling with death in multiple ways, to say it is just a coincidence seems fairly unlikely. Furthermore even the attempt to downplay saying that Shakespeare more immediately after the death wrote comedies, that even makes sense as someone dealing with grief by first emphasizing more joyful bits in life, before coming to terms and finding a way to verbalize some of his feelings in writing after time by writing Hamlet. Of course actual biographical information is limited, since biographies weren’t really a thing at the time, which is why we must suffer the silly Anti-startfordian theory, so we can only know by what he wrote, and by what he wrote, it’s more than just a good guess.

Harris:


Given I intended to re-watch 2 anyway, I was planning on checking it out at some point.

The first clip might require more context, as Ronan is saying her lines naturally enough but I’m not quite getting who her Lady Macbeth is exactly from this scene. Again just this scene. McArdle is pretty big, going for quite the mania pretty early, though again maybe in context it would work, but here felt like a little much.

Older actors always have a bit of a challenge in playing these parts to begin with and found both Buckley and O’Connor splendid in this scene. Buckley, at least in this scene, finds ways in her reactions to find maturing within the scene. Showing her in a way discovering the affection for Romeo as they speak, and almost surprising herself as she becomes more in love with him as the scene proceeds. O’Connor plays the lovestruck incredibly well and with maturity to a degree as well, where he presents his reactions to Juliet as someone becoming entranced and really finding a new life to live in just every interaction with her. Presenting the pure joy of finding someone truly new, and truly special.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Thank you for the response. I also personally found it rather cathartic that Hamnet depicts so well the love that he had for his wife and family (even if complicated by circumstance), while some historians seem to take the harsh view of them being distractions/burdens to him.

This is with the obvious caveat that we don't know the historical, emotional truth, but I definitely know which view I prefer.

Tybalt said...

Louis, your thoughts on this scene from Clouds of Sils Maria? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nETpqcZK8lc

Anonymous said...

Louis, ratings and thoughts on the cast of The Heart is a Muscle.

Louis Morgan said...

Tybalt:

The film within the film is one of those moments where strangely one can't help but ask "have filmmakers actually seen any movies", as that doesn't remotely resemble any blockbuster, certainly not one that would be considered good by anyone. In turn making the discussion silly of trying to make the "highbrow" type see that a performance can be worthwhile within such a film. Having said that, Binoche and Stewart deliver the scene well, particularly Binoche's extremely authentic laughing throughout the scene particularly with the punchline.

Anonymous:

Arrison & De Vries - 4(Both give real emotions to their situation and create that believable tension connected with genuine tenderness beneath the situation. The characters themselves a little too straightforward leaving them to be more representative of an overly generalized idea. They're more than good with what they are working with however, consistently elevating each moment just by playing it in a straight and somewhat moving fashion.)

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your cast for an Ingmar Bergman version of Sentimental Value?

Also, if James Whale had cast someone in the vein of Jacob Elordi for The Monster, which actors back then do you think could’ve worked?