Dean Stockwell did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Ben in Blue Velvet.
Dean Stockwell falls into a specific subset of Lynchian performances where an actor is tasked for brief screen time or a brief scene to make a substantial impact, and Stockwell is game for the part. Stockwell appears during the long night sequence where our hero Jeffrey (Kyle MacLachlan) is brought along for a ride by the psychotic Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) with his gang and the lounge singer Dorothy (Isabella Rossellini). The latter whom Frank is controlling due to holding her husband and child as hostages. The group arrives at Ben’s, which appears to be a brothel of a strange kid that Ben runs. Stockwell doesn’t have much screen time to work with so he doesn’t waste much time in instantly establishing a unique presence to the film and Stockwell. As we see Ben who perpetually wears a robe, carries his cigarette holder and most bizarrely his face is caked with white powder makeup for reasons unknown. Stockwell amplifies the elements with his completely atypical to his typical presence in almost every facet. Stockwell is extremely affected here, though in the best possible way in his way of almost always casually crossing his arms in an overly relaxed yet oddly specific fashion, along with his casual movement throughout the scene where Stockwell makes Ben a strange lord over his very particular domain. Such a manner perhaps living up to Frank’s description of Ben as “suave”, which Stockwell is suave though suave in a way that Frank would find suave, given Ben seems to be the one person that Frank respects in any way throughout the entire film. The specificity of Stockwell’s performance doesn’t end there with his extremely satisfied expression as he glides about his place, and an expression that seems to indicate a state of normalcy where the world of Ben and Frank seems anything but. Stockwell’s vocal performance amplifies this all the more with his extremely gradual way of speaking all his lines with a considerable calm wrapped into every word. Stockwell’s voice would be more suitable for an affected art dealer in some ways yet here as the brothel running drug dealer there is a particularly fascinating quality to his strangeness. Particularly as the scene develops where he receives praise from Frank, which Stockwell’s reactions are both hilarious and off-putting in the very modest acceptance of such coarse yet adoring descriptions. Keeping that manner in mind even as Frank verbally and physically berates Jeffrey for daring not to toast to Ben, something Ben briefly joins in with by punching him as well, though so perfectly weird as Stockwell keeps Ben as calm as ever even in the act of violence. We even get a particularly bizarre moment where Ben even feeds Frank some drugs, where Stockwell is glowing in the moment and the two look more like a pet and a master. All of this oddity would be wonderful where Stockwell crafts such a idiosyncratic creature in Ben that is fascinating to behold, but what takes the performance the next step towards absolute brilliance is when he chooses to serenade everyone with Roy Orbison’s “In Dreams” using the original track and a work light. Stockwell truly makes lip syncing an art form where he is captivating where he might as well be singing the song with how hard it is not to fix upon every single moment of Stockwell’s performance of Ben’s performance. Stockwell takes this idea further in his motions specifically towards Frank where Stockwell’s performance brings this kind of pestering if not controlling motions seemingly to mess with Frank a bit the lyrics clearly mean more to Frank than even people who love the song. My favorite moment from his performance is actually the moment that suggests all of this might be some kind of facade of Ben’s when Frank’s reactions to the song start to become violent. Stockwell’s “Oh shit” expression is perfect as though Ben suddenly realizes the danger of messing with Frank too much and is genuinely concerned, before the music stops and Stockwell returns to Ben’s old manner however now keeping to himself away from Frank. A great moment because Stockwell through the reaction suddenly opens more about Ben’s relationship with Frank and lets us in a bit behind the curtain albeit for a moment. A moment within a scene, and what a scene it is, with Stockwell being an essential facet through his singular creation of Ben that once you’ve seen his work here, you simply don’t forget it.
35 comments:
1. Liotta
2. Stockwell
3. Goodman
4. Ruck
5. Brown
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chow
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
Louis: How would rank all the duos/pairs that have won Lead Actor and Lead Actress in the 2020s so far.
Anonymous:
1. Stone/Murphy
2. McDormand/Hopkins
3. Madison/Brody
4. Yeoh/Fraser
5. Chastain/Smith
Louis: Funnily enough one of my questions was regarding Dean Stockwell, I can't believe it too that Kline was ignored by both and that Roger went with Stockwell, interestingly you'd think WIlliam Hurt was nominated by how often he was mentioned.
I enjoyed it mostly, although I did think Roger Eberts worst nomination was a bit of a weak choice regarding the rules.
Louis: I think it's only 1996 that doesn't have a we picked the winners put up yet?
Louis: Have you settled on a rating and ranking for any of these performances?
Keanu Reeves in Much Ado About Nothing
Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway in Serenity
Ben Affleck, Ana de Armas and Tracy Letts in Deep Water
So suave.
1. Liotta
2. Stockwell
3. Goodman
4. Ruck
5. Brown
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chau
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
1. Liotta
2. Stockwell
3. Goodman
4. Ruck
5. Brown
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chau
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
Louis: What do you think were the reasons for Anora performing so dominantly this awards season (and really being a third consecutive awards juggernaut after EEAAO and Oppenheimer)?
1. Liotta
2. Stockwell
3. Goodman
4. Ruck
5. Brown
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chow
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
I’m going to laugh at all of you when Ruck gets a 5.
An essential part of what's probably the best scene of the movie. I particularly ADORE the way his eyes flutter on "Here's to your fuck."
1. Stockwell
2. Ruck
3. Liotta
4. Goodman
5. Brown
1. Liotta
2. Ruck
3. Stockwell
4. Goodman
5. Brown
1. Noonan
2. Hauer
3. Caine
4. Chow
5. Bowie
Random question, Louis, but what do you think of these two potential recasts of two of this year's Oscar-nominated roles?
Mark Rylance as Cardinal Thomas Lawrence
Rachel Weisz as Erzsébet Tóth (like Brody, she has a Hungarian parent)
1. Liotta
2. Stockwell
3. Ruck
4. Brown
5. Goodman
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chow
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
1. Liotta
2. Ruck
3. Stockwell
4. Brown
5. Goodman
1. Noonan
2. Caine
3. Chow
4. Hauer
5. Bowie
RatedRStar:
I’m not quite sure what Ebert saw with Stockwell in Married to the Mob to that extent, as flamboyant comedic gangsters certainly were nothing new, but hey glad someone got that much out of his performance. I was also surprised that they alluded to Guinness being the favorite, as that’s the first I’ve heard it, based on his globe win I assumed Landau was.
Yeah I would’ve preferred an actual nomination, although that is the start of their conflict with the doc branch, something that will have a vengeance with Hoop Dreams.
And yes only missing 96 at this point.
Lucas:
Those performances are like the identity of Jack the Ripper; they may forever remain a mystery.
Tahmeed:
I think honestly it fits the boxes best of a best picture which has a cathartic ending (which is not the same as a feel good ending) tackles an important issue in terms of perception (treatment of sex workers) oh and a good campaigner helps. And if you look, most best picture winners in the last 20 years have hit these three marks with only a couple exceptions (No Country For Old Men).
Anonymous:
Rylance would be great as he already thrives with greater Straughn scripts with Wolf Hall, and I’d say actually he would’ve been *slightly* better cast, as I think it is easier to immediately buy Rylance as the meek cardinal who keeps his head down than Fiennes (who seemed stronger than Tucci to begin with).
Weisz could go many ways, I think she would probably be more overt with the strength of the character, though something that I prefer how Jones internalized it.
Louis: Yeah I wonder if there was a huge campaign for Little Dorrit perhaps since on paper it wouldn't seem like an Oscar contender due to its length and nicheness. I thought Landau was the favorite as well due to veteran status and the fact that Kline seemed be suffering category confusion. I mean its a pleasant surprise since I didn't think Siskel or Ebert would choose Guinness.
Whats even weirder is Ebert actually gave Married to the Mob a thumbs down, the show was quite unpredictable though which I guess makes it an interesting.
RatedRStar:
Yeah it's interesting to note that Kline missed a Globe nod altogether and didn't win LA, NY, NSFC or NBR. So kudos to the academy for recognizing his genius against the grain.
Louis: Here's what I thought they would predict, what you reckon?
Best Actor - Hackman for Ebert, Olmos for Siskel (he praised him in his review but I also could have seen Siskel go for Hackman)
Best Actress - Meryl Streep for Both (its tricky since I cant find the Gorillas or Accused review.
Best Supporting Actor - Kline and Phoenix, for either Siskel or Ebert, I thought that at least one of them would be chosen since they liked Fish, and I remember them years ago both praising Phoenix as the best thing about Running on Empty which got a split reaction from them.
Best Supporting Actress - Geena Davis for Both (I had a feeling since they loved The Accidental Tourist, I think the pair of them and myself are the only ones that love the film lol)
Best Picture - Tourist for Siskel, Burning for Ebert (its always easy to predict this from their top 10 list)
Best Song - Let the River Run for both (they liked the film a lot, Busters song is too mainstream and they usually don't go mainstream, Siskel didn't like Bagdad Cafe, Ebert did but he was more intrigued by the film)
Worst Nomination - Beaches for Art Direction for Siskel (some nice beaches and hats) Sunset for Costume Design (some nice Cowboy outifts) I thought they would go for small fry like they did with Gerard Depardieu's nose in Cyrano.
Should note on Kline: He was campaigned in lead, so the Academy nominating him in supporting was actually a surprise at the time.
RatedRStar:
Yeah I wasn't surprised by Hackman (as Ebert praised his performance heavily on multiple occasions) or Hoffman entirely, thought both would go with Streep though they loved Working Girl. Although we did get into a thing they often did on the shows where they came up with somewhat arbitrary logic to diminish the other performances, which I always think is unnecessary (when it comes to performance analysis), but goes I think more so in their willingness to disagree with each other more than anything, which to be fair is entertaining. I wasn't too surprised to see both to go with Davis and picture of course was predetermined. With Song I'll say I was a little surprised that they loved them all, but I'll admit I've often had to side-eye their musical tastes at times.
I wasn't too surprised about Weaver just because neither loved the film, also Siskel didn't love Weaver elsewhere, he also dismissed her in Aliens for example. Although I will agree with Ebert that Siskel is underrating her severely, and even falsely, because his analysis kind of totally ignores the later scenes of her performance depicting the character's switch to obsessive and militaristic in her approach to protecting the apes.
Robert:
Which is interesting that he theoretically was a last minute surprise nom, because no one, except maybe River Phoenix, seems terribly surprised when he won.
Robert and Louis: I do love River Phoenix's reaction, Landau seemed happy too, they looked happy that Kline had won lol, otherwise ye he got a fairly muted reaction, it feels weird because..Geena Davis was sort of a surprise winner although that can be explained with the film coming out so late that it got late traction. Stockwell and Guinness got quite a few critics awards so they probably weren't huge surprises for noms, Phoenix got Globe nom, Landau won Globe, I mean Kline might have been a consensual 5 since it doesn't seem like there were that many contenders in the precursors, I mean Raul Julia got the Globe nom but his film wasn't loved, Lou Diamond Phillips maybe....??
RatedRStar:
I actually found the LA times predictions for 89 just to see, and they predicted Kline at #2 for supporting actor and apparently he led some exhibitors poll, so maybe everyone just went by the general vibes back then.
Louis: That nice to hear, seems like the 5 were set, Who do you think was number 6 for 1988 in the acting categories, I feel like Forest Whitaker might have been number 6 for actor but I also feel the buzz for Tourist might have nearly helped Hurt.
My guess on Hurt's snub was they figured "4 in a row is too many".
RatedRStar:
For actor, I lean towards John Cleese because he got the Globe nod, won the BAFTA (which side note if you haven't seen it, he gives one of the all time great awards speeches) and Fish did very well overall. But also it feels like Hurt finally hit the wall of "we recognized you enough" given he didn't get the Globe drama nod either. I lean away from Whitaker only because Bird underwhelmed (despite its random sound win) with it missing all three nods it got at the Globes (including Eastwood's truly random director win). Although I'd like to believe it was Jeremy Irons...but we all know that Dead Ringers was never going to be nominated for anything back then.
Actress I lean towards Lahti who was a prior nominee, was nominated for a Globe, won LA, and her film did decently. Whereas Curtis obviously struggled for Oscar recognition forever, although it could've easily just been MacLaine given her Globe (3 way tie) win and the way certain vets could get noms like that, e.g. Lemmon for Tribute.
Supporting Actor is anyone's guess, I'm biased towards Palin but he makes more sense than most on paper. Given Harris or Julia would've been sole nominees, maybe Lou Diamond Phillips though.
Supporting Actress: I'll somewhat irrationally say Mercedes Ruehl only because she's the best part of that film (though to support my claim she did get NSFC), and they recognized Stockwell, so why not. Certainly wasn't Bujold or Braga, I doubt it was Hershey, could've been Olin maybe because they nominated her the following year.
Louis: Is the Bafta speech the one where he just thanks random people?
Yes
Louis: how do you suspect Gary Oldman would fare as Cardinal Thomas Lawrence?
Louis: Your favorite cinematic 'reason you suck' speeches, and it can't be Kirk Douglas's one in Paths of Glory over and over (which is probably my list).
How close was Vide Cor Meum (Hannibal) making your 2001 original song top 5, I remember you liking it very much and I'd probably have it in 3rd or 4th.
Louis, your present directing choices for Billy Wilder and Frank Capra?
Anonymous:
Again like Rylance I think he innately has a meeker presence, though capable of being extremely incisive e.g. his George Smiley, so he likely would've been a great fit.
Tahmeed:
"I pity you" - Paths of Glory
"Is there an echo in here" - The Insider
ABC - Glengarry Glen Ross
Runway - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Rejecting Potter's offer - It's A Wonderful Life
Afterbirth - There Will Be Blood
Nearly the entirety of the film? - Harakiri
Lipnick's last meeting with Fink - Barton Fink (though I do feel sorry for Barton there)
My hate dies with you - Braveheart
"Herr Janning, it "came to that" the *first time* you sentenced a man to death you *knew* to be innocent." - Judgment At Nuremberg (Shortest but I love the line/moment so much.)
Luke:
The lyrics aren't original, that's also why the Misty Mountains from the Hobbit wasn't included either.
Harris:
Wilder:
Anora
The Death of Stalin
The Holdovers
Frank Capra:
The Shawshank Redemption
The Menu (in Arsenic and Old Lace mode)
Small Things Like These
Post a Comment