Friday 12 April 2024

Alternate Best Actor 1945: Laird Cregar in Hangover Square

Laird Cregar did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying George Harvey Bone in Hangover Square.

Hangover Square follows a pianist and composer who slowly gets more demented as he moonlights as a serial killer.

The nature of this brief synopsis makes this sound like a very similar role to Cregar's performance as Jack the Ripper in The Lodger, the fact that George Sanders is pursuing him, and it takes place in foggy gaslit London only adds to this approach. BUT, it ends up being quite a bit different, one as the nature of this character's evil action, at least initially, are due to schizophrenic episodes. The schizophrenic episodes in a way gave the audience the Cregar they were expecting, almost as an appetizer with the way the film opens, although to be fair even as heavies Cregar was always finding new ways to play them. Here is such an example as he plays a man killing in the initial scene of a random murder to his episode with this specific intensity, though that is granting a chilling quality because of the sort of hollowness of Cregar's performance. He's just going about it as he would do almost anything as we see him killing a man in a fire and it is nothing more to him than just that, before wandering off where we see his George regain himself, and suddenly we see a very different performance, and really a very different looking Cregar as we see a far more slender man than we had ever seen him any films. In fact he almost nearly looks dashing all things considered, and even more so Cregar is allowed to play even more into the idea of sympathy, though I'd argue he always covertly provided sympathy to his fiends most of the time to begin with, but what we see here is a man with an affliction. Where Cregar plays wonderfully the genuine befuddlement as he walks the street wondering how he got blood on himself and is carrying a knife that he believes might've been used at some point.

When we see George contemplate this Cregar's reactions that of true thoughtfulness and even a dreaded horror at the idea that he might be an unknowing murderer. Cregar creating a potent kind of empathy for the poor soul in this moment, particularly as George's choice is to immediately finding Police Psychologist Dr. Allan Middleton (Sanders) in this instance, to try to get the man to prove he is a murderer. And it is indeed hard not to feel sorry for poor Cregar as he speaks every line with such sincere honesty as he speaks of all his fears for what he has potentially done and is trying to be found guilty. Only when it turns out the knife hasn't been used for a murder and that the blood was his own, is George saved from his guilt and Cregar presents the same sincerity in the character's powerful relief. Cregar brings an innocence even that is particularly wonderfully realized, even as it is turned on its head as poor George discovers yet another knife that would make him culpable for the crime. Cregar's reaction again is not of the monster by the sympathetic man, as you immediately sense the confusion in his eyes and even more so a genuine sadness to what he finds. Cregar this time not portraying the criminal element of Bone as something that compels him, rather something that haunts him deeply as a curse upon him. Cregar creating a change within his often played role of the evil man, this time the evil is something the man is unable to escape, and Cregar creates that penetrating and horrible sense of the madness just beneath the surface that the seemingly decent George would just love to be able to hold at bay if he could.

The film then progresses into something a bit more unexpected within the overall design as it becomes more so the good man, despite what we already know of George, getting pulled into the wrong world by a femme fatale, in this instance Netta (Linda Darnell) a pub singer, that catches his eye. Cregar's performance is terrific in being sincere, though sincere in a way that you wouldn't have seen in his other performances, in that he's not twistedly romantic, here he's trying to be genuinely romantic with Netta. This as he plays a song for her that he's written with her mind, and Cregar brings this great combination between confidence and vulnerability in these moments. The confidence as the man introduces the song with this ease as though music just is second nature to him, and there's that passion as just part of him as he plays for her. Contrasting that however is the interest he has in her where in his eyes it is of sincerity and he speaks only with this reserved shyness of the man trying to make something of this relationship, despite it becomes pretty clear she just intends to exploit him for his musical ability by writing "pop" songs for her, as opposed to the more extensive orchestral works that he's passionate for. Something that is additionally represented by the woman genuinely interested in George, Barbara who also supports his musical passion. Unfortunately George is caught up with Netta, where Cregar articulates so effectively the growing desperation that I think he is quite effective in that he doesn't immediately turn this into obsession. Rather he brings initially the real glint of hope and candour in his voice that is of a man who believes himself to be in love, even as Netta only will cultivate despair for him.

And this is where the film does get a bit unwieldy, however Cregar is great consistently. As first Barbara questions his actions causes him to fall into a triggered state of trying to murder her which fails, and we get a respite as George apologizes, unaware of trying to murder her, with a genuine sympathetic manner in his performance. But then Netta prods him once again for gain, and Cregar is terrific in showing his earlier passion going to this pent up rage and really the sense of disgust for both her and himself as he tries to return to his actual life of the passions he cared about. Unfortunately for him things go one step beyond as he goes into a state again, where he goes about murdering Netta, with the murder musical sting from Sweeney Todd to boot, before returning to himself one more time. Although this time he doesn't quite return to himself, and here's where the film gets sloppy however there is an anchor in Cregar. Cregar finds some actual logic within his own performance that seems to suggest that George himself is being driven crazy by all that's going on with him, even as he still is innocent of his worst crimes. Cregar portrays a difference as George goes off the deep end now, because before it was about that eerie calm in his murders, it is with genuine mania. A specific mania though that still denotes vulnerability in the man as he becomes no longer attached to any of the women but now his music, his original passion. In this Cregar finds something especially potent because when he describes his need to get to his concert over the accusations of murder, Cregar presents not as the man avoiding his guilt but rather this completely sincere desperate belief in his real love, which is for his music. His actions then give it his all to be part of his music, though as this self-destructive act that Cregar finds this sense of a man who might as well die with his music as his only solace in his burdensome life. And as he goes about playing his final concerto, Cregar is outstanding in the intensity he brings within the performance, that again though speaks to man trying to find this singular focus as the madness is all around him, to the point that singular focus too becomes its own madness. A madness filled with only passion and leading to a memorable climax, and unfortunately final act of Cregar's entire career, as he desperately and fearlessly continues to play even as the entire theatre burns around him. An outstanding performance, where Cregar once again proves his measure by finding a new avenue with a villain, but in this instance suggesting new pathways for himself beyond where he had been pigeonholed. Cregar leaving one final reminder of the tragic loss of his talent, with his all too brief career.

40 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Jonathan Williams said...

What are your thoughts on Brahm's direction and Herrmann's score.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I've only seen I Wake Up Screaming, where he was fantastic. Awful that he passed away so young, likely related to the weight loss for this final performance of his.

Louis: What are some roles from the 50's, 60's and 70's that you think Cregar could have been great in?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Darnell - 3.5(This seems to be *her* performance as far as I can tell from what I've seen her with this cold but sultry combination of the callous woman who exploits others. Even if it is similar to everything else I've seen her in.)

Sanders - 3(He's good as per usual, but needs something to riff off of to really make something more substantial. But either way, it is nice to hear exposition through his wonderful voice regardless.)

Marlowe - 2.5(Doesn't make too much impression as the "good" woman, though she's more or less okay.)

Jonathan Williams:

Brahm's direction is something I'd call inconsistent to a degree, because there are certain moments that are filled with such potent atmospheres in the camera choice, the lighting, the production design, the use of music and really the use of Cregar. There are the moments where there is such a striking and gripping sense of place and sometimes a gripping sense of psychological place as the use of that Sweeney Todd effect for example, is just creating this sense of a nightmare while in the mind in a fit of madness. There are other moments though that are more perfunctory and in a way perhaps there seems too much less passion for everything around George. There it can be occasionally comparatively straightforward, and sometimes the storytelling is a touch muddled. Mostly though when it seems his heart is in the film is a captivating piece.

Herrmann's score is outstanding work filled with so much distinct mood as is the expectation from him though also so much more. The main theme is a brilliant work where basically it is a combo between madness and beauty as the piano is demented, yet works strangely inline with the score despite being purposefully separate in building towards such a specific emotional mood. Then there is the standout concerto sequence, which is extended work that is absolutely gorgeous and includes parts of motifs that Herrmann would eventually develop even further in Vertigo. The extended musical sequence is basically Herrmann throwing everything into it, and it is crazy in terms of the construction and the disparate parts, yet it completely works within its intention in its combination between seemingly the broken and the sublime.

Tahmeed:

50's:

Addison DeWitt
J.J. Hunsecker
Jonathan Wilk

60's:

Oscar Wilde (though given he made his name through a stage performance about him, I imagine he might've gotten a film made about him earlier.)
Prince Prospero
Gracchus or Batiatus

70's:

Clarence F. Doc Tydon
Howard Beale or Arthur Jensen
Bill Compton

Tony Kim said...

Louis, your thoughts on these episodes?

Seinfeld - The Airport
Frasier - Frasier Crane's Day Off
The Simpsons - Homer the Heretic

Anonymous said...

Louis what were thoughts on Tokyo Vice season 2 overall, and cast ranking?

Tony Kim said...

Mitchell, your appreciation of Silver Joy has been helpful for me in narrowing down selections for an acoustic recommendation. Cna I get your thoughts on this song? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NWjRmfnmIk

Anonymous said...

RIP Eleanor Coppola

Mitchell Murray said...

Tony: Rather brief but also very nice S&G track. Found the soft style of singing to be very appropriate for the song's lyrics, as someone reminiscing about a lost love with both nostlagia and longing.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on LaShelle's work in this film as well as Fallen Angel.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Could you check out Dead Of Night and The Wicked Lady before you finish.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your thoughts on Wrestlemania 40

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I only saw the night 2 main event in full, highlights for the others and the WHC post-match. I thought it delivered and Cody-Roman is one of my all-time favourite mania matches with the last 10 minutes being pure magic.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Have you watched any of X-Men 97?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: What is your opinion on the 2 most controversial things about second season of Fargo - the appearance of UFO and the final episode twist involving Hanzee Dent? Personally I view it as Noah Hawley's major "I'm too big to fall" moment.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

I think I gave you thoughts on the Airport recently.

Frasier Crane's Day Off, long before it happened multiple times to Tony Soprano, experienced the existence of the fever dream, and the episode is quite effective in its moment of the reality of when Frasier imagines Gill and Niles trying to kill him. Great Niles bits as well in his attempt to take over first awkwardly the confidently, and then a great climax in Frasier's medicated mess of an attempt to take over that is hilarious, particularly with Niles's attempted save.

Homer The Heretic is a great episode, and is an example of a great early Simpsons, in that the premise is relatively simple in terms of Homer choosing not to go to church anymore and then goes back at the end. What makes it a great episode is just every moment around that, whether the gags of Homer's particularly indulgent choices on his Sundays off, particularly his moon waffle, to the nature of the frozen church in contrast, then every gag, despite the scene also working with a certain intensity, of Ned doing his best to save Homer, which also in turn naturally bends around to convincingly make Homer change.

Anonymous:

Season 2 was really good, especially the last two episodes which were altogether great. Naturally took all the seeds of the first season and pulled the strands together where it managed to craft a puzzle where it used almost every character piece fit together in crafting such a satisfying plot conclusion which was also steeped in character growth so naturally.

1. Show Kasamatsu
2. Ken Watanabe
3. Rinko Kikuchi
4. Kasuke Tanaka
5. Ayumi Tanida
6. Shun Sugata
7. Takaki Uda
8. Yosuke Kubozuka
9. Atomu Mizuishi
10. Miki Maya
11. Hyunri Lee
12. Soji Arai
13. Ansel Elgort
14. Aoi Takeya
15. Danny Burstein
16. Masayoshi Haneda
17. Kosuke Toyohara
18. Kazuya Tanabe
19. Ayumi Ito
20. Sarah Sawyer
21. Jessica Hecht
22. Rachel Keller
23. Takayuki Suzuki

8000's:

Fallen Angel you could argue is as beautifully shot as Laura in the night scenes anyways, in terms of the dynamic compositions, the especially moody lighting, and the real emphasis on the whole idea of noir as this shadowy more angular world. When not at night, it's still well shot but not as distinctive. But regardless the style form LaShelle is on point as per usual.

Hangover Square is beautifully shot with always the excuse of gaslighting, you get that especially intense and dynamic mood constantly. The whole Guy Fawkes day that is basically a show off sequence that LaShelle does not waste in using the flames to craft a noir hellscape beautifully. And of course the final sequence, along with Herrmann, LaShelle also gets to show off and doesn't waste it in making the compositions of the performance as grandiose and expressive as the work itself.

Robert:

I have, and for me much better than what I got from the trailer.

Ytrewq:

I like em both actually. The UFO I think works because it remains vague enough in its use as is its reference from The Man Who Wasn't There, as this observing thing that never explains itself to those it's observing. The other I get more, story-wise I have no problem with him changing identities then starting his own criminal organization, having said that, the guy he becomes doesn't remotely look like the possibility of any plastic surgery job, but besides that I don't have any issue with it.

Anonymous said...

Louis, thoughts on your Tokyo Vice Season 2 cast top 5.

Luke Higham said...

And during Supporting, could you watch Two People, Paris Frills and Pink String And Sealing Wax.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Is it just me, or did Cal Dodd totally forget how to do the Wolverine voice? His natural Irish accent is bleeding through half the time.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

For Kasamatsu, Watanabe and Kikuchi, I don't have any additional thoughts but rather it is natural continuation and progression of what we got from them in season 1. Especially Kasamatsu, where it is so comical how much more he is the star of the show than Elgort (though he probably is giving his best work here).

Tanaka and I'll also mention Uda, who is also terrific, both thankfully were able to expand way beyond the "best friend" sidekick roles they got in season 1, and we actually got a powerful sense of who they were individually as reporters as well. Each finding their own life, in Tanaka portraying so well frustrations of the character, without just becoming the villain, as the man who doesn't want to just be the sidekick, and managing to do it in a way that conveys humanity of him even if imperfectly. Creating less savory qualities but in a way that granted the character a far greater depth, and I'm so glad they didn't end up making him just a villain for it either.

Tanida I thought was pretty one note in season 1 as the big bad worst Yakuza, though not ineffective in that note, it did feel limiting. Thankfully he gets so much more to do this season in a way that actually made him far more menacing by showing more to him. As Tanida gets to be the charismatic man where we see the false facade of the businessman that can make deals beyond violence even if that is his go to, and even a bit of pseudo warmth and tenderness if imperfectly displayed. Tanida then made it so when he turned on the evil of the character it cut that much more deeply because it was the realization of the real intense violence of the man that was a constant even as he often hides it to be the smiling face. And additionally his performance in his last scene is outstanding in terms of detailing every moment of that realization that becomes especially cathartic, but also not simplistic.

Robert:

Yes, though what I think it is, is he no longer is doing the "Wolfman Jack" part of the voice, that is pretty essential to the sound of the character, which I saw a pretty recent clip where he did the "This One's For You Morph" line and it still sounded the same. My guess, is doing the "Wolfman Jack" voice probably hurts his throat much more than it used to, and they let him not accentuate it...which again I think kind of WAS the voice in many ways.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Ohh, that's right, you did, my mistake. Thoughts on "The Opera", then, and Peter Crombie's performance?

Luke Higham said...

I'm happy you liked Dead Of Night. Looking forward to Redgrave's review, just as much as Karloff's.

A said...

It’s pretty sad how Cregar died.

Louis: who are you favorite silent film era actors/actresses

8000S said...

Louis: I was remembering your cast for a Dieterle Les Miserables, and I'm disappointed how it was never a thing.

Makes one wish it existed instead of Tom "Dutch Angles Everywhere!" Hooper's version, don't you think so?

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

The Opera is an interesting episode as it has genuine thriller elements in it, that are played about as genuine as the show got in terms of the nature of the intensity of the character. And that goes with Crombie's performance who doesn't play the part as a comedic sociopath, though many of the things he says are funny because of how insane they are, but rather as a genuine sociopath. And strangely because he's so straight in his approach that it works in being so quietly intense, such as the scene with Elaine "I like to encourage intruders", or the scene with Kramer. I mean both scenes could be out of a horror movie theoretically, but he's dealing with comedic characters, with just slightly turned up lines, but what's so funny is he's so completely dialed in as the insane man. Otherwise beyond the "thriller" elements that has the ideal button in the end, just hilarious in terms of creating the overarching bits, such as the George being uncomfortable, to Jerry being "tough" with the Opera crowd, or the whole idea of scalping Opera tickets. But the most memorable bits are the Crazy Joe, particularly his scene with Kramer, where Crombie is terrifying, but again how Richards plays it is key, particularly his kid-like "yeah" when asked if he's still scared of clowns.

A:

Chaplin, Laurel & Hardy, Keaton, Conrad Veidt, Greta Garbo, Lillian Gish, though my silent film exposure is comparatively limited.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

I mean, of course. It's a shame that there really isn't a definitive version.

Matt Mustin said...

Funny thing about Cal Dodd is, maybe because I never really watched X-Men the animated series, but to me, the definitive Wolverine voice is actually Scott McNeil.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Have to agree with Matt on McNeil. Evolution wasn’t as good as the 90’s show, but it had good things. One thing it did better was Wolverine. More of a supporting character, great dynamic with Kitty and Rogue, and the best part was no Jean love triangle subplot (because Jean was 17 in that version). McNeil’s take was growly in a way that sounded a little more natural than Dodd, and also noticeably Canadian.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Other thing good about Evolution: It gave us X-23.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt & Robert:

Although to give credit to Dodd, he setup kind of what became more or less the expected voice for the character, as a starting point anyways, particularly when you consider his voice in Pryde of the X-men/Spider-man And his Amazing Friends...where he was Australian for some reason.

Matt Mustin said...

Well sure, Dodd wrote the blueprint and then McNeil perfected it.

8000S said...

McNeil was actually born in Australia, funnily enough.

8000S said...

Louis: By the way, one of McNeil's fellow voice actors that works with him, Brian Drummond, did his own take on Wolverine.

https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/tv-shows/Astonishing-X-Men/Wolverine-Logan/

Thoughts?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

I may be coming out of left field with this one, but for me Mark Hamill is actually the definitive voice of Wolverine, just beacuse of how suprising and cool it is that a man in charge of playing Joker for so long found an opportunity to voice The Man with the Claws as well. And that novelty factor aside, I still find that he gave an effective performance within confines of his story and was able to disappear into the role quite well.

Anonymous said...

Luke, what year in the future do you think Louis will have seen all the 5 star performances from Silents to present day that are available for viewing.

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

I'm gonna say 2036 or 37 is the year where everything that needs to be seen will have been seen by then as he's definitely missed potential fives in the lead actress category like Sandrine Bonnaire in Vagabond, Joanne Woodward in Summer Wishes, Winter Dreams or Isabelle Huppert in Story Of Women etc.

What has had me thinking of late is that although Silents/2020s are expected after the bonus rounds, I would love to have a leftovers season for 1 year beforehand. Get the remaining fives out of the way as well as any critically acclaimed/masterpiece/hidden gem that he missed. Especially from the likes of Ray, Ozu and Koreeda.

And to make it fair for everybody, each can pick up to 5 film recommendations or 1 TV series recommendation that would be locked in during that period.

For content, officially post the Female rankings albeit in an incomplete state because I have now recorded every single 4 (unranked) that Louis has ever given which I'll post/send to him along with the lists that I've been working on.

For reviews, any 5 or really strong 4.5 that he comes across or even a performance that he didn't get the opportunity to write about such as Ewan McGregor in The Ghost Writer.

Luke Higham said...

And to make it easier for him, for each year the more essential films will be at the top of the list.

Tony Kim said...

Louis, thoughts on what's reported in this NYT article? https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/14/business/media/netflix-movies-dan-lin.html

Archived version in case the above link doesn't work: https://archive.ph/6RaGd

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Good, I think with Wolverine you need a combination of intense, commanding but with the edge of being feral, which this carries the idea largely effectively.

Tony:

Bound to happen, though I think the title is slightly misleading, as Lin's cost cutting measures wouldn't just be in the auteur budgets, but all those Netflix original films few have heard of and fewer have watched, given the amount of films being made being decreased was clearly mentioned, which would relate to those one per week films that fall deep in the catalog a second after release. One would hope, perhaps foolishly, that this will lead them to at least try to cultivate quality films if they're going to be a smaller slate, then the Netflix, just release whatever, where really the auteur films were the outliers not the rule. And not surprising given, as the article mentions, after being given the budgets, except for at least Fincher, most of the notable directors they pulled in only made one film with them, and it didn't become a relationship as I would assume Netflix probably wanted.