Sunday 6 March 2022

Alternate Best Actor 2021: Bradley Cooper in Nightmare Alley

Bradley Cooper did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Stanton "Stan" Carlisle in Nightmare Alley. 

Nightmare Alley is a strange experience for me, in that I don't think I really properly watched the film the first time. Sometimes I'll get a film the second time more because knowing the journey I will more greatly appreciate that journey for what it is, but that's not the case in this instance. Here, I knew the journey from the 47 film starring Tyrone Power against type, which I quite like, even with its production code tacked on pseudo happy ending. So on my first watch I admired the film, however I think I almost did not allow myself to experience the film staying too focused on waiting for the scenes I knew were going to happen, rather letting myself get carried into the story. Well re-watching the film, and now not having my mind try to match scenes in my head, I just got to experience it this time, and much to my surprise I have found it far more gripping, emotional and powerful, keeping in mind that I rather liked the film even with that strange viewing experience the first time.

Although he came up short in terms of acting Oscar nominations, Bradley Cooper had a banner year in 2021, with two wildly divergent turns in Best Picture nominees. One being his scene stealer pseudo one scene wonder of Jon Peters in Licorice Pizza, which is a wild extravagant comedic performance of the highest order, and here where he is the lead dramatic character, who almost appears in every scene of the film. Cooper is Stan Carlislse the seeming drifter who becomes far more than that. Where Cooper does nothing but talk as Jon Peters, Cooper doesn't say a word for about the first ten minutes of Nightmare Alley. In those 10 minutes though Cooper says much as shows his ability to act in silence, and even with only minor actions as we watch Stan enter the film, theoretically Stan at his most true self. An entrance that differs greatly from Tyrone Power's entrance as Stan in the 47 film, who is much more this kind of average man when we meet him. Stan here has a history which we see a snippet of in the very first scene as Stan is disposing of a corpse by placing in a rundown shack before burning the place down. Cooper's performance displaying this calm of a workman in this task before coldly marching off to find some new start. Where Stan in the 47 film seems an affable man at the start of the first film, Cooper's Stan takes you aback a bit as comes off as true drifter, someone moving away from a past he has no desire to stay in. 

His performance in the initial scenes of discovering the carnival crafts a beguiling identity in Stan. His physical manner alone has this tight authority, someone who seems prepared for any confrontation, but also this masking darkness about the man who keeps his head down, and his eyes frequently away from the gaze of others. We follow him into the carnival where Cooper's performance portrays this certain intrigue within Stan as he examines the place though with almost this suspicion. The moment of going to the geek show in a way is particularly essential, as Cooper's reaction is subtle yet speaks so much in the eyes of Stan viewing the lowest of the low though with this quietest of empathy, something we will see only sparingly within Stan throughout the film. Even without speaking what Cooper does here though is the man seemingly looking for some new avenue, there isn't what I'd call a sense of shame exactly but kind of crime about him, though what the crime may or may not be is largely ambiguous as this time, combined though with the man looking for some kind of future. Cooper's work presents Stan really in this transition of Stan as though he is looking for something to be, just the quietest of a hint of ambition as his eyes seem to be seeking something in his surroundings. A minor ambition partially fulfilled as he suddenly finds himself a job moving the carnival for its owner Clem (Willem Dafoe) and its strongman Bruno (Ron Perlman). 

We finally hear Stan utter a word when he is tasked to capture the local geek by Clem within an haunted house attraction. Cooper still portrays Stan as the guarded man in this task still in a way isolating himself even in seeking this man just for some quick cash. Stan finally speaks and we get one masterful aspect of Cooper's performance to first reveal itself, his accents. Again accents aren't something I always focus on because they are often overly focused upon, but when it is a great one, and serves a greater purpose that is notable. Now here the accent might not seem that, though it is extremely well realized in Cooper's vocal turn in crafting an authentic accent fitting someone from the mid-west from a impoverished background. There's more to it though as in this moment in confronting the geek, and really saying he has nothing against him, Cooper's voice is particularly harsh and more earthy in its quality, natural to this man which denotes a hard life. Something that seems to reveal itself faster when the geek attacks him and Stanton lashes back at him quickly and with brutal efficiency. Cooper's performance in this scene is essential and exceptional in the quickness of the ferocity of his violence. It is with this instinctual attack, that goes further than just defense and turns to attack. In this Cooper shows a man as himself ready to fight, ready to kill, as a man who has had to steal and possibly kill to survive. 

After helping capture the geek there is a particularly important moment in Cooper's performance where Clem thanks Stan for his efforts and offers him a job, noting the carnival doesn't mind much about someone's past. In that moment of speaking this, Cooper's manner loosens just a bit and stay loosened in the subsequent scenes at the carnival, showing this at least minor sense of comfort in Stan within the carnival. Stan quickly ingratiates himself within the carnival starting with the fortune teller Zeena (Toni Collette) and her husband Pete (David Strathairn). A key moment to what Cooper is doing in this performance actually is a very brief one when Stan is taking a bath and Zeena begins making a sexual pass at him. Cooper is terrific in the scene because although it seems Zeena is the aggressor, and she certainly is, the moment she mentions his looks, Cooper face switches quickly to a come hither smile, before returning to the younger man just allowing himself to be taken by this older woman. A subtle manipulation which will be Stan's game throughout the film, and a brilliant aspect of Cooper's performance throughout the film. The key to Cooper's performance, which is clear on initial viewing but even stronger on re-watch is that Cooper shows that in almost every situation Stan is playing on something. And while there is a real man within Stan in Cooper's performance there are a whole lot of different shades of the illusions he creates to obscure the man's nature. 

Take in the carnival itself where we get separate qualities of performance in Cooper depending on who Stan is acting besides. One of the immediately obvious is Stan when he is acting as a partial barker for Zeena. There Cooper's accent has a subtle shift to a less harsh mid-western accent, something that is rather affable and sounds almost looks a eager news paperboy at times, the perfect accent to get crowds to believe you and intrigue you into buying into the show. The fascinating bit about that though is we also get that same endearing energy with the pretty young woman who works as the carnival Molly (Rooney Mara). Cooper is amazing in that he adjusts slightly again. The accent is similar but a bit truer with Molly, though still false to the accent we heard when confronting the geek. His physical manner though is wholly different as Cooper becomes genuinely so charming as he tries to win over Molly. Cooper is fantastic because you wholly believe the intention as he brings such excitement in his manner and such spirit in his words as he makes romantic overtures and even romantic gestures such as showing off a new technique for Molly's electricity bit. The thing that Cooper does though is he wholly pulls you into believing Stan as this romantic lead suddenly as he genuinely is endearing when showing off the new trick to Molly, and against one's better judgment you buy into him as this caring soul just trying to give Molly the world.  

This though is different from his performances with his two mentors in the carnivalof Dafoe's Clem and Strathairn's Pete, although even between those Cooper is very different in the way he articulates the relationship each time. With Clem, Cooper portrays this very practical manner of the listener and the follower. Cooper suggests someone just taking in the information and following the orders he need to, in order to get ahead. Clem freely gives his info out and in turn Cooper portrays Stan just going along, close to the more brutal man we saw initially but just slightly more at ease. His delivery though is very direct such as when he notes "he never touches the stuff" regarding alcohol it is with a dismissive straightforwardness that even Clem doesn't fully enjoy. With Pete the relationship though is very different as Cooper takes a slightly more submissive posture even around Pete and almost has these glowing eyes of the young man seeking information from the wise old man, even if that man is a broken down booze hound. Cooper in the same moments though delivers in his eyes this penetrating  expression when Pete introduces his ability of creating a code to read an audience's possessions and his cold reading ability in order to read a person. Cooper creates in these moments this tangible sense of Stan building the path for his future in his eyes as his eyes seem so sharply drawn to the concept, and the power that seems possible within it. 

In his time at the carnival there are a few moments where it seems like we might see the true Stan, or at least some wholly true feelings from him. His interactions with Pete speak to this when Pete does his whole act and creates this entire backstory about the watch that Stan wears that must have been taken from his father who he loves and hated. Cooper's excellent in the reaction of filling with this real sense of the anxiety of this old relationship and that sense of the fear of his past opening up, until Pete reveals that it was just an fixed reading that can work on a great many people. The other are in the moments of the mention of the geek by Clem including when Clem disposes of the geek and then tells Stan how one procures a geek through drugging an alcoholic. In these moments, and another honestly poignant one of Stan going to share a cigarette with the imprisoned geek, reveal the glint of humanity in Stan. I love how Cooper plays these scenes and shows them to be where Stan almost can grant his sympathy or at least pity to the people who he views as having a worst plight than him, which is few. Cooper though goes even further though in presenting this kind of fascination even within this sympathy. There is something about the geek that nags into his inner soul, and Cooper is fantastic in presenting that sharp and specific pain that seems to torment Stan regardless of his position. 

Stan begins to take on the power that he learned from Pete and in turn Cooper is exceptional in realizing this technique that depends so much on a specific kind of charisma. Now charisma might be enough to pull this off, but what takes Cooper to a greater achievement in again fashioning the kind of charisma needed for his specific mark. We first see this when a sheriff comes into the carnival to try to shut it down, and Stan, using bits of information here and there decides to cold read him to get him to stop. Cooper is outstanding in this scene by first presenting this kind of meekness in his manner, an easily believable man of the general place who no one should suspect again. When speaking to the Sheriff Cooper does it with this particular religious inspiration as though he is being pulled to the sheriff to try to speak to the man as some kind of holy prophecy. Cooper's eyes fixated on the man in a mesmerizing state though as though he is a born again preacher delivering the lord to the man via this sermon, when of course Stan is just finding a way for the man to stop. Cooper controls every moment in this performance as he intensifies the state as the Sheriff breaks more and more, and what I love is that Cooper is able to make it this strange attack on the man in terms of his character, by noting the man's pains, yet with this inspirational streak to get the man to believe him as he articulates thoughts of the mother with this kind of poignant pause and empathetic glare. Cooper embodies exactly what the Sheriff is looking for in Stan in order to find some kind of peace. 

We then leap in time as Stan leaves the carnival with Molly to start his own mentalist act though not in venue in an upper crust city. We get yet another accent transformation and even posture change as Cooper performs as "The Great Stanton". Stan when performing now speaking with an overly affluent sounding accent, almost a southern dandy, befitting the group that Stan is now performing with. His manner though totally changed less as the grounded preacher type as he reads the audience and now with this air of natural elevated state as this man who can see the beyond. Cooper's movements in these scenes are that of really an over the top performance, as Stanton is most certainly performing for the crowd to seem so much more than he is. In Cooper's performance you see the sense of power that Stan feels from the situation and the quiet joy in his expression as he wields this control. We see this when the equally amoral Dr. Lilith Ritter (Cate Blanchett) attempts to break the illusion of his show by messing with the code and asking Stan to identify something hidden in a purse. Cooper is again incredible in the moment hesitation before his eyes become so piercing as he successfully describes the contents of her purse before then continuing to pursue her by attacking her based on his read of her. Cooper bringing this vicious incisiveness in the moment and a bit of glee as he attempts to cut Lilith down, before quickly shifting to a new mark, a local judge, by prodding out the information on death of the judge's son creating a new target. 

Again what is so outstanding about Cooper's work is the way he can articulate the duplicity of Stan which differs from person to person, while still revealing elements of the true Stan in part from these acts, but also in the moments where he is caught astray. With Lilith, whom Stan recruits to get info from her work as a psychiatrist on her wealthy patients, Cooper doesn't show Stan exactly as himself really but rather as Stan would like to be seen as by her even, which is as the confident and articulate grifter. Cooper comes in so assured and shows where Stan is embracing his most sinful behaviors in lust but also just in his description of his crimes. Cooper brings such satisfaction as he talks about his technique to her and his love of making the money off the fools that are buying what he is selling. Cooper goes to something beyond though in this enjoyment as it is this satisfaction he has in his delivery of a man who has achieved his goal in life seemingly, which is to steal from those who always seemed so far ahead of him and glory in it. In turn his lustful relationship with Lilith is defined by just that, and his natural transition to sleeping with her and even drinking alcohol with her, Cooper makes it this natural shift into embracing his sinfulness with someone he sees as a mutual sinner. Important to note the scene where Lilith's required session with Stan, the thing that really gets her off more than anything, and Cooper is magnificent in this scene. He naturally portrays the slow reveal of more vulnerability in Stan as she prods him to reveal more including his past and possible murders. Cooper is fantastic as his delivery combines this attempt at pushing aside the past, this attack on the very idea of the past, but also this somber self-loathing when he gives into the thoughts and reveals a bit about his failed family life with a weak willed alcoholic father. 

The near final sequence of the film is as we see really two sides pulling on Stan with Lilith helping him con first the judge, then his reclusive rich friend Ezra Grindle (Richard Jenkins). This is against Molly still trying to have a relationship with Stan and push him towards a less manipulative life. With Molly, Cooper is great in showing really the blithe manner he has towards Molly after seeming so earnest when he had been courting her earlier. When Molly says she won't help him with the spook show, Cooper is marvelous by showing the shift in the manipulation. First in his explaining that he's trying to help Grindle as Cooper gently delivers the description as though he's offering piece of mind with his phony spiritualism. When that doesn't work, Cooper is perfect in the final moments of pleading with Molly where Cooper again does show that really it was all a grift with her too, as he accentuates a caring vulnerability when speaking to Molly and getting her to come back in order to impersonate Grindle's deceased mistress. Speaking of Grindle, Cooper portrays Stan as really fully gone into nearly believing his nonsense as he first shows off with the judge's wife then with Grindle. Cooper presenting these moments without shame as this man prodding and playing with the people, with a sly smile in giving them peace while still prodding for more money and power from them. Cooper is never slicker than he is with Grindle showing the full powers of the man, fascinating as he creates this blend between the showman and the real devious spiritualist, trying to act as though he is uncovering some truth with Grindle while he is in fact just playing with the man's inner turmoil.

The climactic impersonation scene I really didn't give enough credit to on my initial viewing, yet found it magnificent on re-watch, in large part due to Cooper's performance that brings a surprising nuance to the situation. This as while Cooper indeed portrays that Stan is indeed manipulative, as he listens to Grindle's confession where he seems to indicate he may be a serial killer, his reaction speaks to a greater realization of the danger of the man, and the fear that he's put Molly in real danger. In turn when Stan kills Grindle as Grindle's attacking Molly, Cooper's performance delivers a greater depth both as we see Stan return to the man who violently hit the geek once again as he lashes out, but there's an even greater vindictive intensity as he's putting down Grindle. Cooper launching into it almost as he's performing an execution of sorts. The killings leading Molly to finally leave him and for Stan to go on the run. Cooper's physical work again is outstanding because  he so powerfully embodies the tension  of the crime he's just committed, and this certain mania as he tries to cover his track. Just the way Cooper moves around in these scenes is absolutely captivating in creating such a palatable sense of tension. He creates the edge that Stanton finds himself on so powerfully. When Stan seeks an escape route with Lilith, only to find that she's been grifting him out of the cash he's made the whole time. Cooper's reaction is perfection as this shattering of his reality in believing that she was together with him in this mutual lust with the weight on his face of the grifter finally seeing himself as the victim. Cooper brings such dynamic animalistic viciousness as he attempts to get his revenge on her before being forced out due to the police arriving. 

Now before I get to the ending of Cooper's performance, which may be the most essential element to talk about. I obviously already think this is altogether a brilliant performance that only gets better the more you watch it. If Cooper had played the part as Power did, which was as very much an average man where temptation and bad influences get the better of him, that would've been strong work, I'm sure. Cooper makes a different choice though, which makes this version a bit pricklier regardless of the ending, which is to make Stan rotten to the core. Cooper's performance shows a man that sees everyone, except those below him, as a mark to be taking advantage and manipulated in some way. Cooper articulates this through fashioning a different side to Stan and a different song to play depending on the listener. He crafts a multitude of faces both when Stan is actively performing and just when he's with anyone he can get something from. He flawlessly realizes this in every relationship on screen and there always an angle that Cooper is playing, and it is so effortlessly compelling to witness throughout. But let's talk about the black core of the man, which we eventually see when the opening of the film was based on Stan essentially murdering his own father by exposing the sickly old man to the elements. In that scene there is such hate and contempt in Cooper's eyes and such venom in his one line of articulating these feelings to the old man.
 
After running off from Lilith we have a man stuck with himself and in this darkness. Cooper showing now this alcoholic, wounded and broken, and just his expressions so powerfully shows all confidence and ability withered away. His silent work in these scenes alone is true greatness from Cooper, however I still haven't gotten to the best part of his performance. This being his final scene where he finds a carnival to attempt to ply his trade with a new owner (Tim Blake Nelson). Cooper's physical state is of the broken man and I love that he now shows the "sell" is so messy from Stan. This as Cooper attempts the overly refined accent which is ill fitting to his vagrant appearance showing that Stan is slipping, and can't craft any illusions this time that will convince the man that he's of any use. Cooper couldn't seem more pathetic, so then it seems strange when the owner offer him a drink, for a temporary job at the carnival, the geek, but only till they can get a real geek. The words which echo exactly Clem's method for geek procurement. Cooper is beyond astonishing in this moment from the momentary grin as he takes the drink, before he realizes the true nature of the job, then in that moment of realization Cooper has never been better. Cooper manages to convey the horror the realization from his memory, the sadness of this state, but also this strong mania in his eyes as he grins as he accepts his fate with his haunting delivery of "I was born for it". There's something that cuts all the deeper with Cooper's performance as it isn't just the man being sad about becoming the geek, there is this devastation and eerie acceptance of the man mentally breaking as he realizes that despite all his efforts he has fallen lower than his lowest point. His tormented laugh that is both heartbreaking and harrowing in the terrifying combination of horror and joy, reveals a man who can't help but laugh at being unable to escape what appears to have been his dreadful fate by some universal design. It is an unforgettable ending, to this masterful performance by Bradley Cooper, as the portrait of a man, who for all his tricks and charisma could never escape the weight of his dark soul.

75 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Any upgrades.

And damn, all the way up to #2.

And thoughts on Del Toro's direction.

Luke Higham said...

I don't think I've ever seen this many paragraphs for a Lead review.

RatedRStar said...

Weirdly enough while I was watching the film, I really wanted to eat a full English Breakfast after seeing Cooper eat sausage with eggs lol.

Calvin Law said...

With a review with this kind of length and detail (completely agree with you on the climactic impersonation scene, his face when he realises Grindle's deal is just incredible) and the fact the film has shot all the way up to #2, I think this might be the one.

RatedRStar: Same lol. The food in this looked GOOD. That steak and eggs plate Dafoe was gorging on looked dee-li-cious.

Anonymous said...

1. Cooper
2. Cumberbatch
3. Washington
4. Nishijima
5. Rex
6. Jadidi
7. Jones
8. Hoffman
9. Patel
10. Isaacs
11. Birney
12. Stanfield
13. Phoenix
14. Kaluuya

Tim said...

your thoughts on this film's Screenplay and Direction?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Funnily enough the movie lost some power for me on the second viewing (too pretty for its own good, at times), but Cooper’s work just got better. It’s amazing how such an internalized performance never gets drowned out by such big direction.

Luke Higham said...

Yeah, Cooper's definitely doing the double here.

Aidan Pittman said...

Definitely feel that I should rewatch this. Liked it the first time though wasn't fully in tune with the pacing then, and I do think I'd appreciate the thematic elements and Cooper's performance more.

Louis: How would you rank Guillermo del Toro's films you've seen?

Calvin Law said...

Extremely looking forward to Nishijima's review.

HTT said...

Such a great performance from Cooper here. Really considering upping this whole movie up to a 10/10, but I have to wait for when I give it a rewatch.

HTT said...

Also, NISHIJIMA HYPE!

Anonymous said...

Louis, your 11-25 films of 2021.

Shaggy Rogers said...

After this analysis, there is proof that Dicaprio made one of his biggest mistakes in his career. I hope that with Killers of the Flower Moon he has a great performance.
It was my dream to see Louis giving to Cooper 5s.

Razor said...

Louis: Thoughts on Paul Anderson and Holt McCallany.

Calvin Law said...

As per usual, the Spirits really pleasing to me. Passing for Cinematography and Supporting Actress, Rex for Actor.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Okay, I saw The Batman. If it ended maybe 25 minutes sooner and if Dano didn’t try and Ledger it up, I’d put it on The Dark Knight’s level.

Oliver Menard said...

Hell of a long review. I don't think Nishijima could match this praise but I could see him taking runner-up.

ruthiehenshallfan99 said...

Out of curiosity, does anyone think there's a Best Picture Winner duller than Out of Africa?

Oliver Menard said...

Robert: Exactly my thoughts as well. The more I think about Dano's performance the more I realize there's some major problems with it. The Riddler is supposed to be a deranged petty genius but it was too tryhard for it's own good.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

No curiously I feel the exact same way about Blanchett, and actually think maybe they should've cast someone more unexpected, the thing is while I don't think Blanchett does anything wrong with her performance, because it's Blanchett there never is the thought that she isn't playing Stan, which someone who is more naturally disarming could've created more of an illusion, again I think it is more casting than performance however.

As much as I've never been the biggest Del Toro fan, not that I hate him just never quite bought him into the greatest filmmaker, that has always been more so on the writing front than the directing. I loved his direction here that almost might be called Neon noir just by the colorful nature of his aesthetic. I have to say to the point I don't understand his choice of the black and white version, since the colors of the film are such a big aspect of the aesthetic of the film. I love the lurid grandeur of this approach that is almost anti the choices of the 47 film that emphasized obviously shadow and small scale choices. This one doesn't hold back on the production value or the visual grandeur and for me it works in creating this vivid world for the film to take place. In Del Toro's take it isn't trying to craft reality but rather Del Toro's stylized version of the 40's. Del Toro effectively brings you into this atmosphere by taking you from really Stan's perspective of the cold remains of that house, through the fields of Oklahoma to bringing you into this intrigue of the vividly realized carnival. The carnival is very much where Del Toro's heart is, not that the people here aren't duplicitous as written, but his love of "monsters" comes through in the loving detail he brings to every aspect. I love his choice to really show the carnival so many different ways, days, night angles, slow days, big crowds, the interior, exteriors, the off-days of the people and the creation of their particular trade, making it so vivid. You can tell Del Toro's heart is less so in the shift to Buffalo, however I think this is an instance where it works for the film. This as his aesthetic choices become much more formal and colder, still stunning to look at, but far more isolating. The focus of the scenes themselves being on the harsh and cruel nature of the situation, and very much the more brutal side of Del Toro comes out. Overall I think what I love about Del Toro's choices is he is mindful of his performers, particularly Cooper, and capturing what they're doing whether it be big moments or more subtle ones. Like the framing of Grindle's confession the way we see Cooper in there captures so much more than if we had just sat on Jenkins, or the final shot, which Del Toro trusts Cooper to deliver, does need some weird flashes or flashbacks, he lets Cooper say it all, which he does.

Louis Morgan said...

Tim:

The screenplay is by FAR the best screenplay for a Del Toro film, it helps that it is working with great source material, but the screenplay deserves far more credit than that. Though it has been stated otherwise, it really is an adaptation of both the book and the 47 film which it takes a few cues from. This includes removing Stan's time as a Reverend, streamlining the interactions with Grindle as well as Stan's time after leaving the city and giving Stan a response to the alternate carnival owner at the end of the story. What this film does though is really find the essentials of the book, the best qualities of it, and adapts it into a singular narrative, aka a great screenplay. What the screenplay does though is articulate the various elements so successfully by balancing them naturally within scenes and wisely breaking the film into really into two halves of the carnival which is Stan's rise then the city which is his fall. The circus half though so well realized in terms of creating these natural interactions and creating this sense of community by taking this approach. Making it in part getting to know the workings of it both through personalities and just the brutal mechanics of it. In the carnival I think what Del Toro with Morgan, finally embrace something I think he longed struggled with, which is a little thing called the grey. Instead of simplistic good and evil, he allows the characters to be a whole lot of things here particularly in Stan, even the most evil character Lilith he doesn't make her one note, and while that is in the book, he thankfully doesn't lose that. He though actually takes a lot of things further like making Pete more of a presence and more tragic, or giving more life to Clem as this man of the earth. The screenplay creates that sense of place with community and you learn what you need to, with Stan's journey, but you also feel like you've really experienced the life of the carnival. Del Toro/Morgan successfully transitions into the city, and I think makes the wise decision in making it sort of this long heist of each scene being a step of Stan trying to make it to his top with the main grift being Grindle, and they naturally make these complications in this along the way, particularly again with the revelation scene. This before the epilogue which I think is just as it is in terms of crafting the downfall of Stan, with the best version of the ending over the book or the 47 film, by the change of one word. Power said "I was made for it" but man "I was BORN for it" just somehow is just another level of perfection. It also be noted that while the adaptation maintains much of the best dialogue from the book, but successfully adds its own that never feels ill-fitting to hard-boiled original rather fits right. In all of this though the greatest success I think is the detail, and again the allowance for grey, in Stan's personal journey that so potently realizes the potent themes of the piece regarding so many different types of grifters/liars, the nature of self-loathing and the price of ambition.

Louis Morgan said...

Aidan:

1. Nightmare Alley
2. The Shape of Water
3. Pan's Labyrinth
4. The Devil's Backbone
5. Crimson Peak
6. Hellboy II: The Golden Army
7. Hellboy
8. Pacific Rim

Razor:

Anderson - (I mean just intense powerful visceral work, to the point he was completely unrecognizable to me despite finding Arthur to be one of the most consistently compelling parts of Peaky Blinders. He just shows this pit of despair that is the man and shows this feral state with vivid precision. Although I do ponder how he still only plays bit parts like these with Blinders on his resume, but regardless of his over-qualification seemingly, he's terrific in his brief screentime.)

McCallany - (Liked his performance basically as the guy who doesn't buy Stan's BS on any level. He's great in his looks and reactions throughout that are just these blunt contrasts to everyone else and his gaze is of one man who completely sees through Stan at every-point however remains the loyal henchmen.)

Anonymous:

Save it for the results.

Michael McCarthy said...

ruthiehenshallfan99: I had a dream JUST last night that I rad to rewatch that movie for some reason and had a very similar thought.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: To hop on what you mentioned about Blanchett, would you say it's a similar casting situation to the antagonist role in Del Toro's previous film (Michael Shannon already seeming unhinged to begin with)?

Bryan L. said...

ruthiehenshallfan99: I haven't seen all the Best Picture winners (yet), but it HAS to be one of the dullest. Only thing I remember about it is some of Brandauers' scenes, and I only watched it for the first time a couple of years ago.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Oliver: The issue with Dano is that keeps trying to do these unpredictable Ledger-like waves of vocal inflection, and it just distracts from what could have been an interesting spin. I like the idea of the Riddler being so pathetic in the end. But Dano takes it too far.

Not helping his case is that John Turturro is so much more compelling a villain.

Michael McCarthy said...

Robert: Definitely agreed on Turturro, he brought SO much character out of every moment he had.

Anonymous said...

Well, anyone who thinks Nishijima has any chance of winning this then..... LOL. As if male actors of color ever get to win on this blog. Once in a blue moon. Absolute garbage sadly!! Cooper's taking it unfortunately. This blog guy loves his white guys. If Abdi and Ali not winning 2013 and 2016 SA doesn't hint this to you, nothing will.

Robert MacFarlane said...

How may Anonymous (Anonymi?) are we at now?

Matt Mustin said...

AMAZING performance in an amazing film.

Calvin Law said...

Has anyone else besides Matthew seen After Yang yet? More it’s sitting with me more I love it - honestly might’ve already watched my two favourite films of 2022 and it’s only March!

Emi Grant said...

Cooper was absolutely astonishing here and I agree with every bit of praise for Del Toro's work here. It's EASILY his best since Pan's Labyrinth.

Love seeing how in spite of the great length of Cumberbatch and Washington's reviews for their own terrific performances, Cooper's was even longer. This will be a very deserving win on a year of marvelous performances.

Also, fuck that guy.

Matthew Montada said...

Loved The Batman& Drive My Car

Letterboxd Review (The Batman): https://boxd.it/2DOdSn

Cast Ratings:
Robert Pattinson - 4.5
Zoe Kravitz - 4
Paul Dano - 4.5/5
Jeffrey Wright - 4
Johm Turturro - 4
Peter Sarsgaard - 2.5
Andy Serkis - 3.5
Colin Farrell - 3.5

Drive My Car:
Hidetoshi Nishijima - 5
Toko Miura - 5
Masaki Okada - 5
Reika Kirishima - 4
Park Yu-rim - 4.5
Jin Dae-yeon - 4
Sonia Yuan - 3.5
Ahn Hwitae - 3.5
Perry Dizon - 3.5
Satoko Abe - 3.5

Marcus said...

12 paragraphs for Cumberbatch, 15 paragraphs for Cooper. I think this is our winner.

Also, to that Anonymous commenter, touch grass and fuck off.

Calvin Law said...

Yeah missed that almost, nasty stuff Anonymous we don’t need that around here.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous: Exactly. Louis LOVES that shit. He practically lives for it. If it wasn't for white men Louis wouldn't even be watching films anymore. :(

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Again, get fucked. Have some shame.

Tim said...

ruthiehenshallfan99: The Greatest Show on Earth. Fuck that movie.

Shaggy Rogers said...

ruthiehenshallfan99: Cimarron and Mrs. Miniver

Emi Grant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ytrewq Wertyq said...

So apparently 4chan found out about this website's existence, huh?

HTT said...

Before I reveal some cast ratings, let me just say that the anonymous users who are being toxic right now should just leave. Louis has made a great place for people to talk about movies without being judged for their opinions, which is why we need to keep toxic idiots away.

Luke Higham said...

HTT: Hear Hear.

Is there any possibility you could check out Fanny and Alexander (The full 5 hour cut) & Flight Of The Eagle from 1982.

Luke Higham said...

And The Passion Of Anna. I'm curious whether we'll get any more fives for Max Von Sydow.

HTT said...

OK, now that I have gotten my opinion on the toxic people out of my system, here's an update on some films I have been watching.

Two days ago, I rewatched Red Rocket. My overall opinion on the film improved even more. I also raised my ratings for many of the cast members. Yeah, what can I say? It's a damn good movie.
9.8/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/red-rocket-2021/1/
Cast ratings:
Quick side note: If you want my thoughts on all the mentioned performances for this film, read my Letterboxd review, as I have written about them there.
Simon Rex: 5/5
Bree Elrod: 4.5/5
Suzanna Son: 5/5
Ethan Darbone: 3.5/5
Cast MVP: Suzanna Son

Also two days ago, I watched Spielberg's West Side Story. I must admit, I'm a bit dissapointed. I didn't exactly love it as much as some other people here do, as I found it quite lacking compared to the 1961 version, but I did walk out of it quite impressed.
8.4/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/west-side-story-2021/
Cast ratings:
Ansel Elgort: 3/5 - He's fine. He has charisma, he sings well and he dances well. His acting isn't good by any means, but it works.
Rachel Zegler: 4.5/5 - I was honestly stunned by how much Zegler commits to this role. She might honestly become a 5 after a rewatch.
Rita Moreno: 4/5 - First of all, love the casting. Warms my heart that she got casted in this version to. Her performance is also very warm. Not anything stunning, but just a very heartwarming performance.
Ariana DeBose: 4.5/5 - DeBose certainly matches Moreno's energy and presence, if not somehow beating it. She also manages to find the heart of the character. Might become a 5 on rewatch.
David Alvarez: 4.5/5 - Even though he is a bit overshadowed by Faist, Alvarez breathes new life into this role, offering up a take which is intense and energized. Also might become a 5 on rewatch.
Mike Faist: 5/5 - Even if I was underwhelmed by the film as a whole, Faist by all means lived up to his expectations. Maybe the most unique presence of any performance this whole year? Great performance.
Cast MVP: Mike Faist

And lastly, I watched The Batman at the cinema alongside a friend of mine. Looooooooove this movie. Everything I have ever wanted from a Batman movie. Flawed, but an undeniable near-masterpiece.
9.8/10
Letterboxd review here:
https://letterboxd.com/htt/film/the-batman/
Cast ratings:
Robert Pattinson: 4.5/5 - Wether the mask is on or off, there is always a very quiet intensity radiating off of Pattinson, something which in my opinion makes for the greatest cinematic Batman performance to date.
Zoe Kravitz: 4/5 - Basically everything you could ask for when it comes to a catwoman performance. There's emotion, there's charm, there's mystery, there's sex appeal, etc.
Paul Dano: 4.5/5 - Dano sure does overact, but he overacts quite tastefully, creating a performance which is strangely terrifying and menacing. Wether you think he is good or not, you can't deny how entertaining he is.
Jeffrey Wright: 3.5/5 - The constant dark voice Wright talked in became a bit grating after a while, but still, Wright was a good fit for the role.
John Turtorro: 3.5/5 - Didn't realize Turtorro played Falcone, so kudos to the make-up artists. Turtorro is strangely menacing and has a very strange aura surronding him. I think he is a bit muted personally, but he's good in the in the role.
Peter Sarsgaard: 3.5/5 - I felt he overacts a bit, but he is belivable in the role.
Andy Serkis: 4/5 - I never could have seen him in the role of Alfred, but he is a weirdly natural fit. I was pleasently surprised.
Colin Farrell: 3.5/5 - Farrell overacts a bit here and there, but I still felt it was a strong comedic performance that also had some good menace over it. Great make-up too.
Cast MVP: Robert Pattinson

Calvin Law said...

Having seen it twice I honestly found Dano and Pattinson both pitch perfect. Agreed with everyone who thinks Turturro is amazing too because he is, I'm probably bumping him up. Agreed on Serkis who I thought was going to be a weak link but that big scene with him and Pattinson is one of my favourites.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: What are your updated ratings for The Batman cast.

Calvin Law said...

Pattinson: 5
Kravitz: 4
Dano: 4.5/5
Wright: 4
Turturro: 4.5
Sarsgaard: 3
Serkis: 4
Farrell: 4

HTT said...

Oh damen, a 4.5 for Turtorro? I must have misted something lmao. Maybe he’ll get an upgrade with a rewatch

HTT said...

* Damn, not damen

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Whenever you update the nominations page, could you make changes to 1942.

John Smith said...

Fuck anon. Louis has reviewed great performances qnd some less great from qll ober yhe role. If you look trough his 10 nominees of each year and his choice for best movies of year you will find selections from all creeds of life.

Michael Patison said...

ruthiehenshall: Cavalcade, Cimarron, and Greatest Show on Earth perhaps. To me, Out of Africa at least has Brandauer and Barry's score. It's just tedious to the point of feeling pointless 90% of the time. The only great bit of filmmaking is the plane scene.

And the Anonymous wanker can get out of here. Not only is his comment heinous, it's also grounded in absolutely zero fact. I don't have it in front of me until I get home from work, but I'll post something later showing everybody he's ever nominated, but I know for a fact that's bullshit.

John Smith said...

Ima rant but i love this blog and i hate seeing this kind of comments, been here a long time and i dont comment so often but no im gonna use a lot of words.

Even if louis have given more wins to white actors that is more because of the reason that untill recentlhy they were not really great parts for minority actors, the great parts that have been nominated often have the charachters heritage as a chachter trait. Would a studio have backed movies like the 'Green Knight' or 'The Personal History of David Copperfield' in the 2000s or the 90s. Maybe, most likely not. I find it intressen that Anon pushed the theory that louis is racist because he has not given the win to black actors, i find it really disturbing when i take into acount how toxic this is when it comes to discussing cinema or art in general. This is one of the few places that is representative of 'World Cinema'. A place where actors starring in movies from India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, England, Hong Kong and many more countries are discussed, appreciated, analyzed and dissected not based on any biases but only the merit of the film, the performance e.tc

I found this blog when i was 13 years old. By that age i was watching movies that many in my age group could not appreciate the way i do. I felt alone in that aspoect,
I had just finished watching the film 'Punch Drunk Love', a movie that tremendous impact on me. The use of color and clothes to bring life to the charachters, the use of space to put you in leads feet and feel his frustration. I wanted to find a place that was as pissed of that Adam Sandler was snubbed for an oscar. I found Louis review, he really liked the performance but he did not love it as much as me. But thats okay because in the end his words encapslulate what i loved about his performance and it made me more sure of what i loved about it. This place dont care about the coolor of the actors film, it depends on if the performance is good. Whetever it as a so called bad actor like Adam Sandler or a so called great actor like Denzel Washington. It's about the merit. The problem is that opportunities for minority actors havent been plentifull, now its getting better. Hopefullt merit one day wont have a color. Lets start here

The The Times They Are a-Changin'

HTT said...

John's right on the money. Places where you can discuss your interests (like this blog for example) are undeniably important

8000S said...

Anonymous: Mifune, Shimura, Freeman have won Oscars on this blog, and you say crap like that?

Matt Mustin said...

We don't have to give the anonymous trolls so much attention.

Calvin Law said...

Agreed. I will say though, it’s true - without this blog my film viewing experiences would be MUCH less international. Would probably just end up watching the same old same old American films and canon directors - this blog has expanded my worldview of cinema immensely.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Yeah, the horse has been beaten good and dead. Let’s move on.

Anonymous said...

Not the dead horse by the way. But to change the subject. What's everyone's favorite background screenshot?

Luke Higham said...

Barry Lyndon

Calvin Law said...

Same.

Rewatched After Yang today and god I wish it was being distributed by any company other than A24.

Razor said...

Anonymous: That's tough. Valhalla Rising I guess.

Tim said...

Anonymous: can't decide on one. My favoriteS are Memories of Murder, Doctor Zhivago and Unforgiven

Michael Patison said...

By the way, here's a Google Sheets with all the info I've ever kept about Louis's nominations and such all in one easily searchable place. I'm currently trying to find and complete some of the Actress and Supporting Actress years he's already covered twice if somebody wants to help steer me in the right direction.

I know it's available here in one place or another, but I'm a list-maker.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XmXFvBtMQo65vQj1m6rFpCaB1PtBf-ZrdYj76onFO88/edit?usp=sharing

Calvin Law said...

This is awesome Michael, thanks!

Michael Patison said...

I should add that I've done a point system (10 for a win, 1 for 10th) in order to try to make some kind of faux-mathematical way to keep track of both number of nominations and quality of performance (not perfect obviously bc overall strength varies year to year).

Matt Mustin said...

I can't wait to watch this again.

Louis Morgan said...

Michael:

I've been trying to keep my actress rankings to the results of a given year of re-analysis.

ruthiehenshallfan99 said...

My apologies for being late to responding to you all, first of all.

Michael: That sounds very foreboding.

Bryan: I kept hoping that his scenes would be longer, but he would continue to disappear and this always frustrated me, especially since he and Meryl Streep had more chemistry than she and Robert Redford did. (I think I've seen most of the ones that are considered "Dull" up to now)

Tim: That one is a guilty pleasure, even with some moments that I would say are too much even for my liking, and with DeMille explaining a lot.

Shaggy: Mrs. Miniver is actually a favorite of mine, but I totally see why it has detractors.

Michael: Cimarron does have some really long stretches of dullness, but that movie angers me more than it bores me. Totally forgot about Cavalcade for a moment, which is really telling about that... Definitely gives OoA a run for its money. At least that one has a somewhat reasonable length.

Michael Patison said...

Louis: I know that, hence why I haven't asked. Boundaries are important. I've been finding some I missed before I decided to start cataloguing actress is all I meant.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Yes, just like that, where both the castings make perfect sense but an against type might've created something truly special.

Luke Higham said...

Michael Patison: Bruce Dern's a 4.5 for The Hateful Eight and Louis confirmed some time ago that Ben Johnson is a 5 for The Last Picture Show, he just hasn't gotten around to physically change the rating on his review.

Matt Mustin said...

I was kinda hoping for a Jenkins upgrade but oh well.