Richard Dreyfuss did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying The Boy Wonder in Inserts.
Inserts comes off a bit like a play that wasn't adapted all that well, even though it isn't based on a play, but it does hold some interest at the very least as one of those 70's films that would only ever have been made in that decade.
One of the most intriguing facets of the film is the central performance by Richard Dreyfuss during his heyday as a rather young leading man. He fittingly plays a boy wonder here as well though in a different profession in the film industry. Here we find him as a director already left behind by the film industry, due to the transition to sound, leaving him to resort to making pornographic films in his large isolating mansion. Immediately to his credit is Dreyfuss's ability to be convincing in creating the very idea of the character. This being this young man who is already spent and more or less done with life. This weariness is wholly captured in his worn eyes, and whole physical demeanor that feels like that of a man who has stayed up all night for the past 10 years. One can feel tired just looking at Dreyfuss here as he makes this man who has wholly burned out that exudes from his very being at every moments he is onscreen. Although we don't know the exact journey that lead him down this place, though we do get a few details, Dreyfuss immediately creates a vivid sense of a long painful history that brought this boy wonder to a rather dark place.
Dreyfuss is an interesting performer with a natural energetic talent, even if it isn't always used perfectly, but this is just right for the boy wonder here. Dreyfuss is fascinating in that he manages to create both a man at the end of his rope, but still realize this idea of the wunderkind of Hollywood who has wasted away. This is through his very specific sort of exasperation that Dreyfuss realizes in his work that manages to wield that energetic style of his in a rather unique fashion. There is this inherent intensity that Dreyfuss finds in the souse director that are this embers of the brilliant talent. A certain unpleasant frigidity quality he brings even in that exhaustion. There is a burden in this that Dreyfuss is able to play into the part that makes the man seem especially uncomfortable in his state. Dreyfuss doesn't make it wholly natural, but instead rather directly atypical. He is not a man who has settled into his state of life. He is writhing within it that allows Dreyfuss to deliver this viciousness of a personality deep within his eyes that are never only glazed rather still piercing in their own way. He creates the sense of the man who is almost in this state of a madness created by his descent towards nothingness.
There is more to the boy wonder than a husk, though not too much, which we see particularly through the other supporting characters of the film. Now on one end we have his relationships with the other men including his male "star" Rex (Stephen Davies) or his producer Big Mac (Bob Hoskins). In his relationships with the men there is a more overt derision that Dreyfuss portrays in every venomous delivery towards them. In these moments he accentuates a most powerful callousness that shows so well the boy's disregard for fellow "users" of the same industry where he's now applying his trade. Dreyfuss differs this subtly within his two "starlets" one former in the heroin addict Harlene (Veronica Cartwright) and later the potential newcomer Cathy Cake (Jessica Harper). With the former Dreyfuss and Cartwright are simply excellent together. In just a few minutes we quickly see their rotting relationship through their performances. There is a certain tenderness even sweetness the two brings in their interaction, even as one drinks towards death, and the other shoots up her arm towards the same fate. They create a warmth though even in this that suggests an older friendship even within this certain grotesque state of their current mutual rot as people.
Dreyfuss has one great moment early on with Cartwright where the boy wonder warns her about the drugs she's taking. Dreyfuss's tired delivery on the surface still shows the man beaten down by life, but deep within it is still an earnestness that reflects an honest concern still somewhere in the man. When she rather suddenly exits the picture Dreyfuss is again remarkable in creating the state of the man. Dreyfuss finds a callousness in his delivery as the boy wonder makes an obscene suggestion in regards to the news, yet again he underlays it with a quiet yet still palatable sadness deep within that reveals itself as this piercing anguish internalized in Dreyfuss's beaten down face. Now this a little bit different from his relationship with Cathy who is initially introduced to him as the girlfriend of Mac, and seems to have a strange interest in the concept of inserts. Dreyfuss initially brings the same disdain towards her initially until she begins to challenge him beyond what he expects. When her interest in him grows, and she begins to encourage his inspiration, in more ways than one, Dreyfuss slowly moves to this genuine interest along with almost a hint of hope at times. Of course this is a little separate, though effectively so, from when we see the boy wonder direct his "films". Dreyfuss is brilliant in these scenes where he does show a spark in the man, though specifically related to the act of directing. This is as he essentially embodies that ambition of a great director as Dreyfuss switches it on suggesting the man the boy once was. This too is unpleasant in its own, mostly due to the end result, though he is amazing as he one moment becomes the tender lover and another the vile sadist. In each though Dreyfuss is absolutely convincing in the success of the man, and in revealing the man in his purest state as a director. Dreyfuss though depicts these as only minor relapses though never wholly bringing the man out of his decay, powerfully showing the man is perhaps beyond recovery. Dreyfuss's work is consistently captivating as he makes use of his best qualities as a performer to craft quite the unique character as this man both bursting at the seams and dying inside.
61 comments:
Louis: Your thoughts on the screenplays of The Maltese Falcon and Double Indemnity.
Louis: Seems like an intriguing performance. Paul Dano in the lead role for a 2010s version of this film?
Shame no fives from this line-up
Charles: Unless Mr. Tognazzi has something to say about that :o
Thoughts and ratings for the rest of the cast? I thought he was absolutely brilliant here, and would give him a 5, and loved Cartwright too. Also kinda hope there’s a chance he might be upgraded for Jaws.
I have to agree with Calvin that Dreyfuss needs a 5. He, Scheider and Shaw are flawless.
*needs to be upgraded to a 5.
Also for the 2010s cast:
Boy Wonder: Dano would be a great choice, alternatively Anton Yelchin
Cathy: Analeigh Tipton
Harlene: Emma Stone
Mac: Burn Gorman
Rex: T.J. Hoban
Louis: your top ten Choi-Min-sik acting moments
Fukunaga’s doing the next Bond. I must say, fine choice, haven’t loved anything of his so far but he does seem to suit it.
Calvin: I think he's a good choice, sure Beasts Of No Nation was flawed in it's second half, but I did see some potential then even if he wouldn't immediately spring to my mind on who I would like to see direct a Bond film.
I personally do wish we're getting the Napoleon Mini-series sooner rather than much later.
Forgetting about the top 8 (That includes Schell), who do you predict coming 9th to 20th. I'm leaving out Tognazzi since he could be Supporting.
4.5
9. Dreyfuss
10. Munzuk
11. Redford
12. Olbrychski (The Promised Land, I think Pszoniak may be Supporting)
13. Curry
14. Mitchum
15. Dern
16. Bates (Cox could be Supporting)
17. Bronson
18. Hackman
4
19. Curtis (Lepke)
20. Connery (The Wind And The Lion)
Louis: Who's your favourite American Actor, James Stewart or Gene Hackman.
Louis: Could Rains go up for Caesar And Cleopatra.
Yeah Dreyfuss and Munzuk are definitely the closest to being 5's out of this lineup, so I agree with your ranking pretty much. I honestly think there might be potential for Curry to be moved to Supporting.
Maybe it's because I'm a bigger fan of his more than people around here, but I would have preferred Michael Mann to direct the Bond film. His most recent film wasn't received very well, so I would have liked him to direct something with a better script.
I'm not sure if the Napoleon mini-series will turn out great. With Kubrick, we probably would have gotten one of the greatest films ever made, but in other people's hands, not sure if we'll get greatness.
Louis: Your thoughts on this deleted scene from The Godfather Part II:
https://youtu.be/15Ucj4YFosk
Louis: Your thoughts on the If Beale Street Could Talk trailer.
Louis: Lastly, could either Caine or Haley go up for 2006 supporting.
Louis: So before he set his eyes on making Public Enemies, Michael Mann collaborated with John Logan on a script that was set in 1930's Hollywood at the MGM studio lot. DiCaprio was supposed to play a private eye that investigates if an actress murdered her husband.
There would have been real-life figures in the film such as Clark Gable, Louis B. Mayer, Judy Garland and Bugsy Siegel and some crucial sequences took place in the sets of The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind.
People's thoughts on the script is mixed. Some people thought it was great while others felt it was good but flawed, particularly the private eye character (they felt that there wasn't much to his character). It was going to have a feel reminiscent of L.A. Confidential, Chinatown and Sunset Boulevard.
Thoughts on this unproduced project.
Louis: Could you clarify whether Swinton is a 4 or 4.5 for Narnia.
Louis: your top 10 michael richards and jason alexander acting moments
Louis: What are your thoughts on John O'Hurley on Seinfeld?
Louis: The Deadly Affair is 1967 by your rules. It says 1966 on Wikipedia but IMDB claims otherwise.
And was Bafta-nominated in 1968.
Anyone else watching Maniac?
Calvin: I'm planning to this weekend.
I'm a little late on this one, but I finally got to see "Hereditary" last night, and uhh.... yah, I'm not getting that one out of my head any time soon.
So apparently Life Itself is this year's Collateral Beauty.
Calvin: On one hand, I weep for Oscar Isaac's career. On the other hand, I would not miss this trainwreck for the world.
Robert: Fuck, didn't realize till you brought it up, but Apocalypse, Suburbicon, Annihilation and now this. Not good.
Calvin: And The Promise, Operation Finale and The Last Jedi (to an extent) as well. Glad that At Eternitys Gate is getting good reviews at least.
Oscar Isaac is probably my single favorite actor who has given several bad performances. High peaks and deep valleys.
Isaac just needs the right scripts and he'll be fine.
He was good in The Promise to be fair and I’m in the minority who really liked his arc in TLJ...but yeah, he’s gotta kick back into high gear soon.
Anonymous: True, but to be fair, Suburbicon was originally a Coen brothers script before Clooney and Heslov did a major rewrite on it, aside from directing it.
Louis: Have you seen Woman in the Dunes from 1965. Your thoughts on it?
Charles: Woman In The Dunes came out in 64.
Luke: I think he prefers Hackman to Stewart.
Charles: I don't think he has.
Everyone: Thoughts on this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke6DoZucws0
Anonymous:
The Maltese Falcon's screenplay is an interesting one to examine particularly as it is both an adaptation and in certain sense a remake of the far inferior 1931 film. One film is a masterwork the other is decidedly not. Now part of this comes from John Huston's direction, which helped to define the nature of film noir, but his writing is perhaps as essential in the success of this version. Now both films more or less have the structure of the novel, although sometimes that is important as the "less" Huston allows by tightening a few points only adds to a greater general urgency within the plot. For example making the ending a whole lot shorter and much more powerful. One of the greatest additions actually though comes strangely enough from Huston working within the strict Hays code, which was not the case for the original film. Huston in turn creates a far more vibrant and clever screenplay than what was in the original film. Now this is in some minor ways, such as Spade not have an affair with his partner's wife that makes the character more likable, but more overt within key bits of dialogue. This is especially within the three villains, where you understand that their homosexuals without having to spell it out. This done far more effectively through Huston's allusions in their memorable exchanges, that make you wholly understand the villains without being so obvious. Of course the major additions of Huston is in parts of the dialogue, which is what help to set that noir standard. Again the story is more or less the same, but the impact of it is made far more potent by just a few additional words/revisions that Huston uses to define it. The greatest example of this being the haunting, near, final line of the film, which actually isn't present in Huston's original screenplay though one has to assume it was done in a revision, that grants a far stronger poignancy to the story than was even in the novel.
It is a little funny as neither Double Indemnity the screenplay or the novel has a great ending, but the film does. The novels being downright ridiculous for cinema, whereas the screenplay goes on a little too long. That great ending, found in the editing process, though this already existed within the screenplay. This being from the touch of granting an explanation to the narration by having Neff tell the story as his confession as the film begins where it ends, eventually in that ending that was eventually found. That structure is a brilliant touch within there anyways though that allows for so many of the words of the novel to be transferred naturally by granting an inner monologue that is extremely effective in crafting the emotional nature of the story, while also streamlining the story. Now as with Huston with Falcon, by Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler himself. in creating such brilliant techniques to work around the Hays code to essentially create the sex in the margin both through the exchanges of lust between the leads, but also in making those certain gaps in-between the scenes. Mostly though it succeeds in crafting such a powerful descent though of a single man, and doing it such a particularly captivating way, both in the tension realized through every character interaction, and plot development but also in that so well realized monologue that creates the real sense of that descent. The greatest element of the work though I think is perhaps the extra bit of development within the friendship between Neff and Keyes, which brings the right sort of intensity as the unknowing pursuer, but also genuinely creates a friendship, with such great little touches such as the match lighting, that pays off so perfectly with that great ending. Even if that great ending is quite intended by the screenplay, it is still a masterfully written piece of work with such brilliantly realized characters, with Wilder naturally moving from his witty banter of his romcoms twisted with a darker bent that is still as clever though used to a different end.
Calvin:
Cartwright - 4.5(She is exceptional, as usual, though in what is really a very risky performance. The biggest risk being the flapper voice she chooses to use which is often leads to disaster. Cartwright though not only pulls it off but it adds greatly to creating the sense of this character. This actresses who would have fit right into the time. Cartwright allows this to add just a touch of the grotesque through this, though only in the reflection of the fallen state, as she carefully avoids becoming a caricature. This is in part how lived in the voice seems but more importantly how emotionally honest her performance is. The sincerity of the voice makes her all the more heartbreaking as there is this inherent optimism within that and her general demeanor. This in turn makes her desperate state all the more painful as she portrays it as this delusion of hope she creates for herself that allows her to live in this state. Subtly within her eyes is a sadness sewn deeper within than that of her attempted happiness as she tries to smile through it.)
Davies - 2.5(His performance is a little much and without the depth to his work that Dreyfuss and Cartwright find in their characters. He's not so much that he's truly terrible but he is easily the weakest link of the ensemble.)
Hoskins - 3.5(His performance isn't nearly as complex as his co-stars but Hoskins is still effective as man who is a bit less conflict it seems. Hoskins offers the appropriate bluster as you'd expect in sort of the traditional producer role, with also the right amount of sleaze to go along with it. It's not overly memorable as Hoskins turns go, but he makes an impression as he usual does.)
Harper - 3.5(From what I've seen Harper isn't quite a great actress, but she isn't a bad one. In fact she mostly suffers here when compared to Cartwright given she kind of replaces her within the narrative. Harper is more than fine as first the slightly pompous "innocent" that slowly reveals herself to be as debauched as the rest. I do quite like the way she doesn't go over the top in the depiction of this shift in her scenes with Dreyfuss, effectively portraying this growth in lusty quality that still seems natural to the character she established when she entered.)
Anonymous:
Choi:
1. Finding the bug - I Saw the Devil
2. Family album - Oldboy
3. Final Face off - I Saw the Devil
4. Happiness? - Oldboy
5. Taxi - I Saw the Devil
6. Sad show - Oldboy
7. First Murder - I Saw the Devil
8. Meeting the mystery man - Oldboy
9. Hospital monster - I Saw the Devil
10. Torture - Oldboy
Luke:
Hackman, though Stewart is very close.
Probably not, but maybe for all of those.
4.5
The Beale Street Could Talk trailer looks visually stunning, feeling that Wong Kar Wai influence once again, which is a good thing. I will say though that is some very stylized dialogue, but given the film's reception I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt and imagine it probably works in full context.
Matt:
O'Hurley - (He's absolutely hilarious in every one of his spots, I will Seinfeld particularly excelled in having great boss characters. O'Hurley could be the best with his marvelous pompous yet mad yet also rather endearing approach to the part. That is particularly in that he actually makes Peterman strangely likable in all his overly grandiose style and overly dramatic manner. I honestly love just everything he does by how he stays so dramatic whether he is reciting lines of Brando from Apocalypse Now or simply sulking over having forgotten to buy plant food again.)
Anonymous:
Richards:
1. Undercover
2. Interrogation Breakdown
3. Cigarette Face
4. "I am Batman"
5. Movie Phone
6. Detective Joe Friday
7. Marriage Explanation
8. "Breakup" with George
9. JP Pennpacker
10. Cable guy Hug
Alexander:
1. A true marine biologist
"2. It's not a lie if you believe it"
3. Independent George
4. "Probably because this universe is against me"
5. Front of a movie theater
6. "greatest" comeback of all time
7. Fire Explanation
8. George the bad boy
9. Doing the opposite
10. "Why'd the police man have to yell at me"
Tahmeed:
Well it's a good thing it was cut. Not that it is a terrible scene in itself so to speak, in fact I like the idea of remembering Sonny's family, but it is terrible if you view how it would have fit into the rest of the film. It would have completely undermined Michael's character, and specifically how he differed from Vito which is such a central element within the juxtaposition of the two stories. Throughout the actual film we see Michael taking actions to protect his family the way he sees fit, yet through these actions ends up isolating himself from that family. This scene shows Michael essentially doing what Vito would have done in the situation, which is all wrong for the character. I greatly prefer how instead the one major "seeing the Don" moment during the party is instead Michael "protecting his sister" by admonishing her which creates only further tension.
Charles:
I have not.
Anonymous:
Well here's hoping the whole project isn't Phoenix's own Venom, as the only creative force I have a great deal of faith in from it is Phoenix himself. Having said this, I actually quite like the look of this, and if I had to name one current actor who I think could do his own thing with the Joker, after Ledger's undeniable impression on the role, it would be Phoenix.
I just watched Mandy, which I admired more than I liked. That said, I was SUPER enthralled by Linus Roache’s batshit work.
Anonymous: I like the look their going for, I admire Phoenix greatly as an actor, and I'm confident he could bring something fresh and inspired to the Joker. Based on my own conceptions of the character Phoenix's personal style wouldn't be my immediate choice; He's played crazy roles before but in a manner of speaking, they've been coiled in their approach, or anchored in some deep tragedy IE Freddie Quell. I'm having a hard time picturing Phoenix giving a purely extroverted, somewhat zany performance like we see in so often in the Joker, though again, that doesn't seem to be the entire story when it comes to this.
Roberts: Thoughts on Cage?
Louis: Your cast and director for your dream/ideal film (or films, since a two-parter or even trilogy could also be made) about the Revolutionary War? I too am curious about the shortage of such movies about the time period.
Louis: Your thoughts on the cinematography of The Adventures of Robin Hood, The Age of Innocence and Bram Stoker's Dracula. It's funny, everytime I think of The Adventures of Robin Hood, I swear I think it won an Oscar for its special achievement in Technicolor photography, but it didn't. Instead it was a musical with Jeanette MacDonald.
Louis: Do you intend to move The Deadly Affair and James Mason over to 1967. By the way, Bafta rules were a bit different back then when films were only eligible by their UK release dates and A Man For All Seasons which although came out in 66 was first shown in the UK in 67 and that's why it was nominated for the 68 Baftas instead of 67.
So The Deadly Affair was actually shown first in the US in January 67 then shown in April in the UK that same year.
There must be a reason why The Deadly Affair on wiki say it was released in 1966, information like that doesn't just get put on there without something validating it for so long.
RatedRStar: It might've had a private screening or something but I find IMDB alot more reliable and If it was 66 it would've been nominated in 67 instead of 68.
RatedRStar: Also, everyone thought Brighton Rock was 47 for the longest time until recently. Sure, anyone can make an edit on Wikipedia and I've tried to find review evidence from 66 and found nothing.
And BFI says 1967. Now surely they know what year it came from since it is a British production.
Finally saw Sorry to Bother You. As a whole I really enjoyed it, especially when it took a turn for the more serious which I found surprisingly effective. And I hate that Stanfield is only 4th in my Lead rankings.
Stanfield - 5
Thompson - 4
Hammer - 3.5
Fowler - 3.5
Hardwick - 3
Yeun - 3.5
Glover - 3
Cross - 3
Louis: And The Servant is 1964 instead of 1963. It was shown in two festivals in 63 and was first shown theatrically in January 1964.
Yesterday i saw First Man and i really liked it, and will probably be a big tech player this season, at the moment i think it could win both the sound categories, scores and editing.
As for the cast:
Gosling: 5
Foy: 3/3,5
Clarke: 3,5
Chandler: 3
Stoll: 2
I was wondering why I wasn’t hearing much about Stoll.
Mason remains 6th in 67 and Bogarde is now 3rd in 64.
Omar: How did you see "First Man" exactly? Where I live its not coming out for another three weeks. Glad to see another 5 for Gosling, though.. Hope I feel the same.
I saw A Simple Favor today. It’s pretty much a total mess, I usually like Anna Kendrick more than most and even she blew it here.
Anonymous:
Logan's script sounds interesting enough, and having an observant type of protagonist in no way would ever destroy a film. Based on Mann's work with Public Enemies, such as his choice to shoot so overtly digital, though would give me trepidation over taking on a period piece.
Bryan:
Let me give that some thought.
Anonymous:
The Adventures of Robin Hood is really a definitive technicolor film and helped set the standard for color films of the period. This in realizing that of such a vibrancy granted to every color in the film through the particularly intense lighting of the period. Although its framing and composition is pretty standard per period, though not in a bad way, it also has a little bits of fun here and there such as the shadows fighting in the final duel.
The Age of Innocence is beautiful work by Michael Ballhaus. This is in the vein of the period pieces of the time to be sure particularly in the choices in a more generalized sense. His work though goes further than a little of the period pieces of the time though, realizing sort of the emotion within the repression so wonderfully in the visuals of the film. This includes just careful choices in which to allow the emotion to witnessed within the performance from the composition of certain interactions, but further in the exact lighting. Again reflecting the period with a certain control, but with these particularly poignant moments of more expressionistic bent that makes it particularly distinct among its contemporaries.
Ballhaus's work in Bram Stoker's Dracula is brilliant as he takes ideas of the color horror films from the 50's and 60's and honestly brings them to the next level. This in ideas such as such extreme contrasts in color, particularly red, which are especially vibrant. This though is with far more dynamic lighting than was traditionally in the case of those films, bringing together the best of both worlds in crafting one stylistic scene after another. This includes the composition and framing of so many shots, that have such a powerful mood in that alone. This is also not to forget the incredible voyeuristic camerawork, especially in the werewolf attack, that helps to make the film a one of kind horror movie.
A Simple Favor looks so odd...
Post a Comment