Thursday, 22 October 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1990: Jon Polito in Miller's Crossing

Jon Polito did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Giovanni “Johnny Caspar” Gasparo in Miller’s Crossing.

A funny thing that can occur with a character actor is that you sometimes mistakenly believe them just to be that character they are most famous for or the style of performance. Polito falls into such a strange situation, though probably helped by the fact I’m guessing a lot of later directors might’ve asked him to “do Johnny Caspar” because of how distinctive his delivery and manner is here, that isn’t at all how Polito actually speaks or even moves around. Polito constructs such a unique character for the character of Johnny Caspar, the Italian gangster who gives the opening speech of the film. What Polito’s performance essentially is doing is creating the contrast between what Caspar wants to be taken as to what he is, which is more than a weight deficit between those elements. Polito very much does not choose to emphasize a tough guy gangster type nor the cold businessman, but rather portrays the falsehood that Caspar is trying to create. Polito’s screeching voice, his beetle like movements, they both are revealing of an innately pathetic man, yet behind all of that is the passion of someone who demands to be treated seriously as an honest threat. 

In the opening speech we get the whiplash of Caspar’s perspective of himself as he first delivers a long speech about how he thinks things should go in the underworld where he states his need that everyone follows certain ethics, albeit criminal ethics, and someone who cheats those ethics, bookie Bernie Bernbaum (John Turturro) be killed for violating that code by not abiding by how fight fixes should go. I love the rhythm of Polito’s speech where at first he does get into a somewhat believable directness of a proper gangster albeit still somewhat of a put on, however as a man who can help himself, he starts festering with rage over Bernie giving his hand away completely as the man who desperately wants to be taken seriously as a force to be reckoned with yet can’t quite fit the part. When head Irish gangster Leo (Albert Finney) disregards his desire to abide by “ethics”, Polito loses it more though with this very specific way of trying to adhere to this certain command yet just letting the rage seep out again and again. I especially adore his delivery of “I’m sick of getting the high hat”, as a man trying to be in some kind of control it yet seething with a uncontrolled desperation for what he wants to achieve yet is denied. 

Polito presents Caspar as a man, an Italian, who basically wants to be in charge of the world, as he sees it, presents himself as capable of it through his approach to the criminal world, yet just like his American name versus Italian name, it is very much a facade. That isn’t to say Caspar isn’t powerful or dangerous, he is, but in a way his power and danger comes from that degree of instability created by the facade that Polito reveals so effectively in every choice he makes throughout his performance. A performance which needs to be said is also very much in creating the strange nature of the man, a strange nature that feels consistent within Polito’s performance. You take any moment with Leo’s right hand Tom (Gabriel Byrne), who Caspar wants to switch sides, where everything is about glad-handing the man he respects. Polito’s wonderful though in the way his glad-handing is so phony in how over the top it is, and correctly so because if need be Caspar has no scruples of having Tom either beaten or even killed at times. All of those are merely un-pleasantries however which Polito again plays as a hand wave as though it isn’t something major to Caspar in his warped perception. A common element, and one random aside I love is Caspar’s advice to get a cold shave where Polito delivers such certainty, such stupid certainty, that it is the best kind of shave as though he is this genius man about town, rather than just a fool pretending he is one. 

The strength of this performance is fitting to the Coen Brothers which is the success of idiosyncrasy. There are no gangster performances quite like Polito in this film, it is entirely its own beast yet works in his own particular way. Where we have actually a pretty fascinating juxtaposition where the “heroes” of the film are the ones who are scheming and making choices just based on personal wants, everything Caspar does show that he does genuinely believe in his ethics, which quick aside Polito’s way of delivering that alone deserves special mention as a gold bit of performance gold, despite his ethics being that of a criminal. His “honesty” makes him a prime target for Tom’s manipulations by making Caspar think his right-hand man Eddie Dane (J.E. Freeman) is betraying him. That prodding results in some excellent reactions by Polito where you see his mind trying to comprehend the idea, first with a quick disbelief then the nagging frustration and eventually that rage against a betrayal of ethics. The rage scene is a terrific moment from Polito because you see again that limited facade break as Polito looks like a bursting pressure cooker as he goes about killing his most loyal man and even loudly proclaims the importance of putting “one in the brain” as a grandiose gesture. Polito makes it this great explosion of that rage of being given the high hat that very much defines him where his attempted “wisdom” of killing this time is delivered as the ravings of a violent madman that Caspar fundamentally is deep down. Jon Polito delivers a truly great performance as he creates a wholly new take on essentially a well worn “genre” of a character. Polito creating a dynamic portrait of a man who knows all the required notes to play the part of boss but maybe doesn't know how to play them. 

58 comments:

Tim said...

R.I.P. Tom Skerritt

RatedRStar said...

RIP Tom Skerritt

Matt Mustin said...

He's terrific here and I miss seeing him pop up in stuff.

RIP Tom Skerritt

J96 said...

Rest In Peace Tom Skerritt.

Luke Higham said...

1. Dourif
2. Polito
3. Hoskins
4. Wilson
5. Ward

RIP Tom Skerritt

Jonathan Williams said...

1. Dourif
2. Hoskins
3. Polito
4. Wilson
5. Ward

Jonathan Williams said...

RIP Tom Skerritt

Maciej said...

RIP Tom Skerritt

Shaggy Rogers said...

1. Dourif
2. Hoskins
3. Polito
4. Wilson
5. Ward

Louis Morgan said...

RIP Tom Skerritt

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Tom Skerritt

Nigel said...

RIP Tom Skerritt.

Perfectionist said...

1. Dourif
2. Polito
3. Hoskins
4. Wilson
5. Ward

BRAZINTERMA said...

5º Fred Ward
4º Thomas F. Wilson
3º Bob Hoskins
2º Jon Polito
1º Brad Dourif

Louis Morgan said...

Rose has a great sense of place and performance from Hüller. The film intriguing setup is most compelling in the first half in creating just the attempt to lead the secret life before the eventual breakdown of it. That is where the film feels more expected and a little rushed. Having said that, the emotions of those sequences still do resonate in larger part because that is when Hüller fully lets loose and delivers on that eruption.

Hüller - 5

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Polito
2. Hoskins
3. Dourif
4. Wilson
5. Ward

Luke Higham said...

Robert: Who was your cast MVP, Mulligan, Tremblay or Waits.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Luke: Mulligan, probably. Lee would be next, then Len Cariou (GENIUS bit of casting there).

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the direction & cinematography for Dreams?

Anonymous said...

Does anybody know where in the comments are Louis' thoughts on Jean Simmons in Spartacus and Elmer Gantry? I have been searching for a few days with the "site:actoroscar.blogspot.com" technique without success.

Anon said...

Anonymous: Maybe you could just try asking him for them directly,

Anon said...

Rewatched Wilson's scenes in BTTF 3, and he's better in it than I remembered. I really enjoy the way he immerses himself into the "Western villain" mannerisms of the role, he's almost like a Deadwood character.

1. Hoskins
2. Polito
3. Dourif
4. Wilson
5. Ward

Lucas Saavedra said...

1. Polito
2. Dourif
3. Hoskins
4. Wilson
5. Ward

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding Wild Horse Nine, when Malkovich as a CIA agent starts talking about memoirs, you just know things are going to get a little crazy. Anyway that is probably indicative of the nature of this film which is very much a variation on a theme than a completely new approach from Martin McDonagh, a film that will be unlikely to convert the doubters, let alone the nonbelievers however the devout will find much to love. As an unabashed fan of McDonagh, I certainly did find much to treasure here even if we once again have two killers by trade, going on a vacation, talking about death more than once and maybe one even finding the connection with a local animal, though not a miniature donkey. It helps that the wholly new dialogue is frequently comic gold but also often quite moving as where McDonagh wholly excels is in the specific exploration of one idiosyncratic man dealing with his idiosyncratic life that probably is far more impactful on the whole world than one would like. Although some might want something completely *new* I found plenty new within the variation in going from a young man dealing with his first mistake in a life of potential violence and instead the journey of an old man trying to reckon with perhaps a life of mistakes in both hilarious and heartbreaking detail.

Waits - 3.5
Posey - 3.5
di Girolamo - 4
Salas - 3.5

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: Do you think Rockwell is lead or supporting?

Anonymous said...

Your rating for Caro Braun in Rose?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Eric Bauza. And at such young age too, just terrible.

Anonymous said...

Louis, could I get your thoughts on Jean Simmons in Spartacus and Elmer Gantry, and Curtis, Lom, Gavin and Dall in Spartacus? Thank you

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Peter Robbins' Charlie Brown and Christopher Shea's Linus.

Anonymous said...

Luke, rating predictions for Bardem, Malkovich, Rockwell and Buscemi.

Luke Higham said...

Bardem - 5
Malkovich - 5
Rockwell - 5
Buscemi - 4.5/5

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Although not an epic in storytelling due to the vignette nature, it is one more epic in terms of the visual ambition of Dreams by Kurosawa. Kurosawa offers one more visual masterpiece, before his truly quietly intimate final epilogue films, where very much creating the larger than life nature of dreams for every story is what he seeks to achieve. Where everything is too much in a way because of the way dreams can be too much and where in a way you can see more through a specific intensity of the dreams. Kurosawa’s style of course wavers wonderfully within the film as we have the sequences like the opening which is a totally playful dream that is one you’d have as a kid that is just a good time, or even the ending where it is of the elder man now but with a similar spirit of a joy of dream where Kurosawa gives himself almost to a musical style emphasis on really the pageantry of it all. You have the artistic dreamer where Kurosawa just lovingly goes big with all the imagination and it is wonderful in just embracing the creative spirit. Contrasting all of those heavily though are two very different nightmares. The soldier’s nightmare is amazing in the imagery but also the haunting quiet way he slowly builds up that nightmare. Against the nightmare of basically realizing I Live In Fear’s worst thoughts, where it is far more explosive even a demonic type of nightmare. In both examples Kurosawa’s amazing in the way he is able to craft two distinct types of feeling in the nightmare one of the quieter regrets and guilt and the other of the most extreme fears being realized as bluntly as possible. A fascinating final directorial showcase where Kurosawa showed he still had it in that grand scope even if he chose to close out with his very intimate personal narratives.

The cinematography is amazing and you see Kurosawa with Takao Saito and Shoji Ueda very much utilizing what is allowed by in a way having no limitation of reality. Where they’re like let’s just have this visually gorgeous work, within some outlandish sets and make it look just incredible. The scope of every shot is just incredible here where he chooses his subjects to purposefully be small within the frame that they then fill up with so much wonder so dynamically and with such rich use of lighting and colors. Which again Kurosawa sometimes just makes it beautiful to see in those fantastical dreams, yet the work is as pronounced with the almost psychedelic quality of the demon sequence or the stark specificity of the ghost soldiers. Every frame here is very intentionally a painting, with the allowance of the material to go for such an obvious extreme, and they do not waste it.

Lucas:

100% co-lead. I would wager that Malkovich and Rockwell’s screentime is even closer together than Gleeson/Farrell’s in In Bruges.

Anonymous:

3.5

Anonymous:

I feel I definitely gave most of those somewhere at sometime, particularly Simmons, unfortunately sometimes some thoughts just seem impossible to find even with a google search.

8000’s:

Both are definitely little kids doing voice work and I would say without too much of a real professional quality in a certain sense. I would say though there happens to be a certain charm in the occasional rough around the edges because you get that specific child’s energy in a weird way.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Do you intend to see Wildwood this week.

Matt Mustin said...

RIP Eric Bauza. Just awful.

Matt Mustin said...

RIP Walter Koenig as well

Louis Morgan said...

Google users' comments only for awhile. Maybe permanently.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the "Got milk" commercial directed by Michael Bay.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: now that you've seen WH9, what do you make of its overall Oscar prospects?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Walter Koenig

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I think you should disable anonymous/non-google comments whilst reviews are ongoing (from memory, it's the time that clown usually shows up) and reinstate them only for lineup/results pages for predictions/requests/recommendations. Awards Season's going to be a drag as usual and need enough options to get you through that period.

Louis Morgan said...

8000’s:

A classic bit of 90’s pop-culture honestly where the whole being unable to say Aaron Burr has never left the cultural lexicon entirely. A comedic enough setup with the over the top set, which is the most Bay thing, of the man’s Hamilton collection with the rather devoted performer with just how distraught he is at his loss makes it such a memorable minute of advertising.

Calvin:

I think it will do fairly well as weirdly it is one of the more traditional contenders as a previously lauded/academy supported writer/director making a dramedy given all the international films involved, You Can See Everything even The Odyssey is more atypical in some respects. It also helps that clearly there is that strong vein of support for McDonagh and the specifics of a year always help.

I think Picture nomination is locked (don’t think it wins), Malkovich will definitely be nominated and definitely can win, Rockwell will definitely be nominated if he stays category frauding, I don’t think he wins though. I think McDonagh right now looks in prime position to finally win the Original screenplay. As I think The Debut will be more so about Moore and Giamatti, I don’t think they will go THAT far with their potential Obsession love, certainly don’t see FJord taking it, and everything else will fall into the “happy to be nominated” club at least from what we can see at the moment.

I think McDonagh probably gets in director, though in some ways it is his least showy film in that regard, but you can never say for sure given he wasn't nominated for Three Billboards despite that film being his best performing film wins wise. Right now though it certainly looks likely.

Buscemi will probably need a “best day” scenario as it isn’t a huge role, supporting actor also looks like it could go a lot of different ways beyond Giamatti/Rockwell/Leguizamo at this point.

I would say some years Di Girolami wouldn’t happen but the category seems open enough for her to get in on the strength of the film.

Otherwise Casting and Editing seem pretty likely, maybe Score based on Burwell getting in for Three Billboards and Banshees though that category is getting pretty competition so probably not.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Though you haven't seen it yet, what do you make of Wildwood's prospects.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Hey guys
Regarding Louis’s wallpaper, I’d like to know which films the two new frames are from:
- Face covered in red
- Country house with a rainbow

These two new frames appear between: No Other Choice and Days of Heaven.

Tim said...

1) Dourif
2) Polito
3) Hoskins
4) Wilson
5) Ward

Tim said...

R.I.P. Walter Koenig

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: With you having rewatched Misery recently for this round, could I have your thoughts on this recent (heartbreaking) Kathy Bates interview regarding her Oscar speech?

https://x.com/ClipperRen/status/2114723473725559028?a=ICZ2iUNVDTEGGr1OsZg&s=20

Louis Morgan said...

With Wildwood I wish I could declare this as a masterpiece as some have but reservations I do feel. I’ll get those out of the way just because I think there is much to praise. Unfortunately, I think some regards of the fantasy world it creates it utilizes a little too many archetypes without enough variation within those archetypes for them to stand out as they do in a great fantasy like Lord of the Rings. They’re more of bits, which I did enjoy to be sure, or they’re very standard types like the bandit leader, the wise sage or the vicious right-hand, more than serviceable renditions however not overly distinctive either. The villain thankfully is fairly distinctive, and while the “outsiders” of our hero and her kind of friend are also types they find more distinction in the specifics of their personalities and in the emotions of their journeys. I think where that limitation was most felt for me was moment of uniting the factions to take on the villain. It just seemed kind of easy and isn’t quite the triumphant moment it should be because the factions were kind of vague. I feel they all could’ve had a bit more idiosyncrasy to them particularly given the film’s longer than average runtime for an animated film. Having said that, the animation is outstanding throughout. It is honestly just one of the most gorgeous films to look at, no qualifier needed. There are so many astonishing sequences just on that level that make the film worth watching. I also thought the humor here was more naturally implemented than in Kubo. The score is absolutely beautiful as well. The vocal performances are strong though I kind of wish Charlie Day and Awkwafina weren’t in it, though they're not bad, in that it feels like a different kind of animated film when they first start talking where you notice the performer rather than just say hey that’s a wolf or a rat. Although even within that reservation what happens with Awkwafina’s character ends up being surprisingly impactful. That is where the film does also work which is the most direct emotional moments and the emotional journey of our main character and her need to find her brother. Although I do think there could’ve been just a bit more within some side characters, in the in-between bits, when the film goes for the big swings of scope and emotional impact, it does absolutely deliver particularly in the third act.

Lee - 4.5
Tremblay - 4
Mulligan - 4
Ali - 3.5
Awkwafina - 3.5
Stenberg - 3
Waits - 3.5
Day - 3
Bassett - 3.5
Grant - 3.5
Johnson - 3.5
Erskine - 3.5
Cardinal - 3
Danner - 3
Cariou - 3.5
Delaney - 3
Clement - 3.5
Jackson - 3.5

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the cast.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I think it probably wins animated feature as thankfully box-office performance has become far less important recently in the category. If it was a hit I'd say best picture is on the table, but since it's not, I don't quite see it going that far. I think VFX is in play, as it was for Kubo, score also is a distinct possibility although as previously mentioned that is becoming a tough category to crack. Probably will get nominated for song, but that category can also always be a bit random. It should be up for PD but there are enough strong live action contenders that I'm not sure this is finally the year that gets an animated film in there.

Tahmeed:

Pretty heartbreaking that Bates in a way never let herself forget "forgetting her mother" even though she didn't but speaks very much to the way one can be on the top of their world of their field yet the parental approval still is what one remembers most whether received or withheld. Where with Bates you can see how much she wears the weight of knowing the sacrifices her mother made for her, to the point of totally allowing for her mother's certain disregard to her achievement. Although her reaction to seeing herself is probably astonishing as in a real time moment you can see the relief on her of suddenly realize that she in fact did the thing she had regretted not doing for so long.

Perfectionist said...

Tahmeed: So darn twisted dude. Convincing your daughter that she didn't thank you. And that you should have her life. Freaking hell.

J96 said...

So Louis, how do you rank Laika to include Wildwood?

And do you still think Wildwood will become the fourth animated BP nominee? Would you have it on your ballot?

Bryan L. said...

Luke: Your thoughts on Harry Kane winning the Ballon d’Or.

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: Happy that a brit won it for a change. Was the most deserving this year.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: It was due, and fitting enough that it was Kane.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I'm not sure if it goes hand in hand with Production Design but thoughts on Caleb Deschanel's Cinematography.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Late Fame.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Lee - (Her performance is a truly great vocal turn where while there is especially strong emotional portrayal in the animation she amplifies that consistently throughout. There isn’t an aspect that her vocal work leaves to simplicity rather in the opening making her a bit more complex and genuine in her judgy qualities at first. Then finding all the different notes she needs to play throughout the journey. Moments of genuine emotional desperation, combined with moments of playfulness, disbelief or even comedic befuddlement. She truly embodies the character with a consistent life where in a way it does what a great vocal performance should do which is just makes the animated character we see fully alive without any disconnect between the animation and the performance.)

Tremblay - (Although given slightly less meaty material like Lee really gives a consistent life to his character with a lot of nuance. I think there was a particular trap in playing the nerdiness of the character but Tremblay manages to play that in a funny yet also genuine way without ever falling purely into type. Tremblay is effective particularly in presenting the degree of growing maturity in the character and as is expected when Tremblay needs to deliver on an emotional moment he absolutely does so with ease.)

Mulligan - (In part she is about bringing the regal gravitas you’d expect from a dictatorial witch type as we very much get what probably would’ve been Mulligan’s take on the White Witch if she had played that part. Where I think Mulligan stands out most is selling the moments outside of the gravitas where she plays a bit of this more overt insanity that comes out in certain moments that she makes quite natural. There are times where she delivers as part of an overpowering madness of grief, yet also moments where you see she is just around the bend such as a late moment with the baby where she manages to be funny while also being disturbing.)

Ali - (Fine gravitas, though can only do so much with the fairly straight forward role.)

Awkwafina - (Although what you’d expect for much of it, she does deliver in her last scene beyond that expectation.)

Stenberg - (Fine, not overly distinctive.)

Waits - (Properly growly work from him where you hear him consistently going for selling the rabid part of a rabid wolf quite wonderfully.)

Louis Morgan said...


Day - (Exactly what you’d expect, though it’s fine.)

Bassett - (Great gravitas with a little wrinkle of playfulness in the character’s own trust in her ability. I wish she had been more honest.)

Grant - (Quick bit of expository gravitas where he brings enough of a slightly atypical approach that makes it a little more distinct.)

Johnson & Erskine - (Exude the certain eccentricity with warmth early on but also bring the emotional intensity later on in their own exposition. It is their scene and both do deliver on finding the emotional nuances in portraying the desperation of their decisions though combined with a certain disbelief that it came to fruition.)

Cardinal & Danner - (Fine general witchy gravitas though not much more than that.)

Cariou - (Thought he brought a lot of character with some natural comedic energy in his relatively brief bit. He makes his stamp quickly however to the point I wish he had more because Cariou really gives it his all and adds a natural push into the new world.)

Delaney - (Enjoyed his quick nonchalance.)

Clement - (Excellent Timothy Spall impression where I thought he really overplayed it in the right way of just emphasizing the slimy weasel with a false regal quality quite distinctly in his brief screentime.)

Jackson - (An enjoyable second half of Clement in delivering every line where he sounds like he’s more than a little lost.)

J96:

1. Coraline
2. Wildwood
3. Kubo
4. Missing Link

As stated previously, I don’t think so because of the boxoffice, though it’s probably going to be a weird year in some ways so you never know for sure.

Well currently it certainly would, but I still have quite a few to see.

Luke:

I’ll have to do more research on the production to see the specifics of his contribution.


Dafoe - 4(An interesting role for Dafoe in that it is just asking him to be pretty straightforward which obviously isn’t what Dafoe is usually called to do. He’s good though in wisely playing into the film’s modest ends. He finds a natural charm in the character getting caught up into the nostalgia of the seeming admiration however is as effective in his fairly understated way of slowly becoming disenchanted with his young admirers. Dafoe never goes big here and it works quite nicely in just pulling us into his quiet little journey.)

Lee - 4(I’ll admit I did think her performance was possibly terrible at first but then eventually it is revealed that is the point. That alone wouldn’t be enough given how ridiculous she is at first, but Lee wisely shows once the reveal happens the nuance and decrease of that extroverted “character” she presents. She plays well the moments of losing really the passion of the performance and bringing genuine emotion within revealing the frustrations the character tries to hide with the character that she plays.)

Donovan - 3.5(I’ll say when he starts screaming he reminded me of Glenn Howerton’s method of screaming therefore I found it absolutely hilarious albeit partially unintentionally. Beyond that he’s good in presenting the false intellectual manner of the character which he slowly erodes throughout until he basically is going off like a rejected golden god.)