Gabriel Byrne did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Reagan in Miller’s Crossing.
Miller’s Crossing falls into one of the Coen brothers films for me where I actually preferred every re-watch than the initial watch because once you know where all the twists and turns exist, there is becomes a greater appreciation for them once you understand them all, know where they fit, and can more fully connect with how every character fits and lives within them. At this point I love this film where once you know what will happen it is all the more fun to go along with each beat, all the more intriguing to truly see just how much depth there is to these characters and just soak in the specific atmosphere and style of the film. Gabriel Byrne’s performance perhaps best represents this appreciation because so much of his performance comes in actually carefully denoting who Tom is, while playing it all so close to the chest, and his work becomes a treasure trove in discovery and frankly unlocking the seeming enigma of Tom on that first viewing.
Byrne however is carefully crafting just who Tom is throughout and it becomes a little bit of a thrill to track Tom throughout the film once you know what he knows. Take the opening scene where up and coming Italian gangster Johnny Caspar (Jon Polito) comes to meet established Irish gangster Leo (Albert Finney) in order to get a hit sanctioned against extra corrupt bookie Bernie Bernbaum (John Turturro). Where Caspar wants Bernie dead because he cheats the cheats essentially where Caspar feels a general mob code must be upheld, however Leo refuses based on the fact he’s romantically tangled with Bernie’s sister Verna (Marcia Gay Harden). Leaving Caspar, and his cold righthandman the Dane (J.E. Freeman) essentially to swear that “it's not over” leaving Tom, Leo’s righthandman, to discuss. Byrne’s performance is perhaps Tom at his most direct in a way where as he calls it a bad play by Leo Byrne delivers it without hesitation and very much an earnest intelligence as both a business partner gives his council and a friend with a little exasperation noting that Bernie is as corrupt as they say. Something, the honestly simple natured, Leo ignores speaking with loving overtones regarding Verna which are clearly clouding his judgment.
That is the inciting incident where Tom will need to play many roles in order to “make things right”, and it is all the different shades of Tom that Byrne brings about so naturally and suggests a lot about the character that is rarely spoken. I think a pivotal aspect of Tom is when he is out of righthandman mode where we find Tom as the aimless man in most ways, literally chasing his hat around most of the time, often drinking himself to a stupor and failing to make a winning bet at any time. Tom is actually a man without a plan when he is given seemingly the most difficult task of just being himself. Byrne’s performance is fascinating in creating this sense of the drifting kind of anxiety within a character who we’ll see is often pinpoint accurate in his life and death choices. The “backbone” of Tom however Byrne reveals quiet listlessness. Where Tom left completely to his own devices is wholly lost except finding escapes in losing himself in the drink or a bad bet. Byrne makes the most of these moments showing a fundamental truth in Tom in a way, who odd as it seems, the difficult situations created within the plot of the film to be able to come to a different kind of life. As when Tom is alone Byrne’s expression truly of a painful detachment with a need to get lost in those vices, an element that feels so natural as a core to the character that in a way is covered up by all the various roles Tom needs to “play” throughout the film.
Byrne has a brilliant way of playing the levels of honesty which means a lot of different things when it comes to Tom, and finds a specific captivating style within Tom’s way through the underworld. One of the roles he plays is the righthandman of Leo, but not when Leo is around, which is a different character from when Leo is around. We see this when Tom is chatting up other men in the organization, Leo’s barkeep, the constantly complaining chief of police and really anyone else who is part of the general status quo or at least won’t be influencing that status quo. Byrne wonderfully plays up a little bit gangster with this just slightly overt overly chummy way at times that segues towards a direct and also played up tough guy act. Byrne in these scenes represents the quick talking brains behind Leo where Byrne projects someone who seemingly always knows what’s up, while also knowingly brandishing the degree of power. I especially love Byrne's way of letting the chief vent before bluntly shifting to frankly menace as he reminds the chief exactly of his position. Byrne so effectively plays this certain style of power broker where he convinces those who don’t need too much convincing of his, though really Leo’s, power.
We see Tom struggle far more to play his part in the scenes where he has to deal with Leo and Verna, because Tom is also having an affair with Verna therefore betraying his #1. Tom’s way of dealing with each though reveals much which Byrne amplifies in every instance we get between the trio. Tom with Leo is a great relationship as Finney and Byrne do suggest a long friendship, albeit with distinctly the since that Leo accepts himself as the brawn figurehead while Tom is the brain, who isn’t always listened to. Byrne is able to bring these complicated shades where there is an openness with Leo in moments supporting the friendship, yet when Verna or Bernie comes up, the shade of complication, some guilt, some frustration keep even a separation between Tom and Leo. With Verna Byrne is fascinating in playing between the margins of the moment because there is an overarching presentation of a coldness between sex, particularly when talking about her brother or accusing her of purposefully manipulating Leo. Byrne wonderfully plays the smallest moments where you sense the smallest break where we see a glint in his eyes of either a bit of self-loathing or genuine love that Byrne shows the act of bottling it up to attempt to present it as a heartless meaningless affair, even though it really isn’t.
Then there is Tom as he deals with the various other players of the game where Byrne is fantastic in accentuating different sides depending on the mark. With Caspar, Byrne delivers every word with the utmost confidence and support, even greater than when being Leo’s man, Byrne’s charisma makes it entirely convincing that he sways Caspar to the degree as the man who sees all the angles, and would be even willing to betray Leo seemingly. Contrasting that however is dealing with the Dane who quite frankly has Tom pegged from moment one but just can’t prove it to his boss. Where we get the moments of Tom frequently taking punches from seemingly everyone, including Leo when Tom reveals his relationship with Verna, and honestly I do love Byrne’s reactions to “here comes another one”, suggesting a man who can take the punch, is willing to, but really doesn't want to still. Byrne finding a natural humor in those moments, yet within the plan Tom runs into more than a few problems. The first being when he sells out the corrupt Bernie, Tom finds unexpectedly he is tasked with killing Bernie by Caspar and the Dane. Byrne is amazing in the scene because you see throughout it his failing to “act” where his face manages to convey the man trying to keep together his composure yet terrified to go through with actually killing a man. Byrne in a way offers his least convincing version when he tells Bernie to go because he brings the fear of the situation in his eyes even as he threatens Bernie to go and not come back.
Unfortunately for Tom, Bernie is as duplicitous as he seems as he almost immediately starts to make his presence known again, severely jeopardizing his scheme to make Caspar think that Tom is fully on his side. This is to the point Dane takes Tom back to the forest where he was supposed to kill Bernie to find a corpse, which Tom will be offered as the replacement if it is not found. In a way this is one of Tom’s most honest scenes because while Byrne still shows Tom keeping it close to chest, within that chest you see a man nearly petrified for his life as his whole expression in the scene is a man keenly aware he has no plays in the situation with Dane and is about to die. When Tom is saved last second because Caspar’s men find another corpse, murdered and placed there by Bernie, Tom’s relief as portrayed by Bernie is not of a cool composure rather this subdued yet potent combination of relief and even disbelief that he managed to survive this one. Although equally sloppy for Tom is when he runs into Bernie again, who blackmails him to kill Caspar, where Tom tries to get the drop on Bernie and Byrne’s physicality is great in the scene because you see the attempt from Tom to be the cold operator in the moment yet failing completely as Bernie instead trips and degrades Tom again. Where again Byrne doesn’t play it as particularly graceful, rather the Tom losing a bet and getting drunk as he sits on the ground.
What we then see is essentially Tom building the confidence in his biggest gamble which is to essentially get Caspar to kill the Dane then hope Caspar and Bernie kill each other. Byrne’s fantastic in presenting Tom getting basically into this flow state as he speaks every word so confidently as the truth as prods Caspar into believing his false story that the Dane has been conspiring against him, leading to the Dane’s death and even more easily getting Caspar to go his apartment where Bernie will be. Byrne’s fantastic because he manages to show the confidence of that performance, and the performance. I particularly love the way he very much whispers venom into Caspar’s ear as very much this move by Tom is so well realized by Byrne’s performance. This leaves only his greatest act as he leads to the ambush where Bernie kills Caspar leaving only Bernie to be dealt with. Byrne’s outstanding in the sequence because you see him playing the levels and really playing towards maybe his toughest mark in the exceedingly conniving Bernie. Byrne initially plays the man Bernie thinks he is, as he speaks openly it would seem, suggesting that they can pin Caspar’s murder on someone else, and playing in a way the old Tom who could never kill him. Byrne needs to convince both us and Bernie that he could get the gun away from him, and Byrne does by being the Tom who would only never scheme not kill. Once Tom has the gun though his whole demeanor changes, and before when Tom was trying to get the courage to kill Bernie essentially Byrne expressed the anxiety of someone with too much empathy to do it. Tom this time, aided by the truly wretched nature of Bernie, allows Tom to change to be truly cold and Byrne delivers in the real hollowness as now there’s no question if he can do it. The cherry on top being when Bernie again cries for his life, despite earlier claiming it to be an act, asking Tom to look into his heart, where we get the absolutely pitch perfect delivery from Byrne in the pure uncompromising moment of soulless determination as he replies “What heart?” before executing Bernie. We see the man Tom needs to become to finish his “smart play”, something Leo compliments him in the final, Bernie’s funeral, where we see Verna fully reject Tom and Leo’s intention to marry Verna. While not as cold as when he killed Bernie, Byrne exudes a changed manner in Tom, having a far more downplayed playfulness in his one liners, being altogether colder reflecting the man he needed to theoretically be to get back to the status quo. But as warm as Leo is towards him, we see in Tom/Byrne’s eyes that change as he essentially rejects Leo’s offer to come back. Byrne shows Tom brutally honest in rejecting the notion of being forgiven by Leo, where we sense both heartbreak in this but also a more pointed version of that old frustration towards his old friend. Tom chooses to remain where Byrne’s final expression powerfully presents the quiet sorrow of now truly solitary Tom where yet another bet has in the end made him again very little if perhaps nothing at all. Gabriel Byrne delivers a brilliant performance that gets better in every viewing where you see in his performance all the different angles Tom is playing, the fun of it, the thriller of it, but also the sadness of it as in every bit we see just a little more of just who Tom is behind it all.
Miller’s Crossing falls into one of the Coen brothers films for me where I actually preferred every re-watch than the initial watch because once you know where all the twists and turns exist, there is becomes a greater appreciation for them once you understand them all, know where they fit, and can more fully connect with how every character fits and lives within them. At this point I love this film where once you know what will happen it is all the more fun to go along with each beat, all the more intriguing to truly see just how much depth there is to these characters and just soak in the specific atmosphere and style of the film. Gabriel Byrne’s performance perhaps best represents this appreciation because so much of his performance comes in actually carefully denoting who Tom is, while playing it all so close to the chest, and his work becomes a treasure trove in discovery and frankly unlocking the seeming enigma of Tom on that first viewing.
Byrne however is carefully crafting just who Tom is throughout and it becomes a little bit of a thrill to track Tom throughout the film once you know what he knows. Take the opening scene where up and coming Italian gangster Johnny Caspar (Jon Polito) comes to meet established Irish gangster Leo (Albert Finney) in order to get a hit sanctioned against extra corrupt bookie Bernie Bernbaum (John Turturro). Where Caspar wants Bernie dead because he cheats the cheats essentially where Caspar feels a general mob code must be upheld, however Leo refuses based on the fact he’s romantically tangled with Bernie’s sister Verna (Marcia Gay Harden). Leaving Caspar, and his cold righthandman the Dane (J.E. Freeman) essentially to swear that “it's not over” leaving Tom, Leo’s righthandman, to discuss. Byrne’s performance is perhaps Tom at his most direct in a way where as he calls it a bad play by Leo Byrne delivers it without hesitation and very much an earnest intelligence as both a business partner gives his council and a friend with a little exasperation noting that Bernie is as corrupt as they say. Something, the honestly simple natured, Leo ignores speaking with loving overtones regarding Verna which are clearly clouding his judgment.
That is the inciting incident where Tom will need to play many roles in order to “make things right”, and it is all the different shades of Tom that Byrne brings about so naturally and suggests a lot about the character that is rarely spoken. I think a pivotal aspect of Tom is when he is out of righthandman mode where we find Tom as the aimless man in most ways, literally chasing his hat around most of the time, often drinking himself to a stupor and failing to make a winning bet at any time. Tom is actually a man without a plan when he is given seemingly the most difficult task of just being himself. Byrne’s performance is fascinating in creating this sense of the drifting kind of anxiety within a character who we’ll see is often pinpoint accurate in his life and death choices. The “backbone” of Tom however Byrne reveals quiet listlessness. Where Tom left completely to his own devices is wholly lost except finding escapes in losing himself in the drink or a bad bet. Byrne makes the most of these moments showing a fundamental truth in Tom in a way, who odd as it seems, the difficult situations created within the plot of the film to be able to come to a different kind of life. As when Tom is alone Byrne’s expression truly of a painful detachment with a need to get lost in those vices, an element that feels so natural as a core to the character that in a way is covered up by all the various roles Tom needs to “play” throughout the film.
Byrne has a brilliant way of playing the levels of honesty which means a lot of different things when it comes to Tom, and finds a specific captivating style within Tom’s way through the underworld. One of the roles he plays is the righthandman of Leo, but not when Leo is around, which is a different character from when Leo is around. We see this when Tom is chatting up other men in the organization, Leo’s barkeep, the constantly complaining chief of police and really anyone else who is part of the general status quo or at least won’t be influencing that status quo. Byrne wonderfully plays up a little bit gangster with this just slightly overt overly chummy way at times that segues towards a direct and also played up tough guy act. Byrne in these scenes represents the quick talking brains behind Leo where Byrne projects someone who seemingly always knows what’s up, while also knowingly brandishing the degree of power. I especially love Byrne's way of letting the chief vent before bluntly shifting to frankly menace as he reminds the chief exactly of his position. Byrne so effectively plays this certain style of power broker where he convinces those who don’t need too much convincing of his, though really Leo’s, power.
We see Tom struggle far more to play his part in the scenes where he has to deal with Leo and Verna, because Tom is also having an affair with Verna therefore betraying his #1. Tom’s way of dealing with each though reveals much which Byrne amplifies in every instance we get between the trio. Tom with Leo is a great relationship as Finney and Byrne do suggest a long friendship, albeit with distinctly the since that Leo accepts himself as the brawn figurehead while Tom is the brain, who isn’t always listened to. Byrne is able to bring these complicated shades where there is an openness with Leo in moments supporting the friendship, yet when Verna or Bernie comes up, the shade of complication, some guilt, some frustration keep even a separation between Tom and Leo. With Verna Byrne is fascinating in playing between the margins of the moment because there is an overarching presentation of a coldness between sex, particularly when talking about her brother or accusing her of purposefully manipulating Leo. Byrne wonderfully plays the smallest moments where you sense the smallest break where we see a glint in his eyes of either a bit of self-loathing or genuine love that Byrne shows the act of bottling it up to attempt to present it as a heartless meaningless affair, even though it really isn’t.
Then there is Tom as he deals with the various other players of the game where Byrne is fantastic in accentuating different sides depending on the mark. With Caspar, Byrne delivers every word with the utmost confidence and support, even greater than when being Leo’s man, Byrne’s charisma makes it entirely convincing that he sways Caspar to the degree as the man who sees all the angles, and would be even willing to betray Leo seemingly. Contrasting that however is dealing with the Dane who quite frankly has Tom pegged from moment one but just can’t prove it to his boss. Where we get the moments of Tom frequently taking punches from seemingly everyone, including Leo when Tom reveals his relationship with Verna, and honestly I do love Byrne’s reactions to “here comes another one”, suggesting a man who can take the punch, is willing to, but really doesn't want to still. Byrne finding a natural humor in those moments, yet within the plan Tom runs into more than a few problems. The first being when he sells out the corrupt Bernie, Tom finds unexpectedly he is tasked with killing Bernie by Caspar and the Dane. Byrne is amazing in the scene because you see throughout it his failing to “act” where his face manages to convey the man trying to keep together his composure yet terrified to go through with actually killing a man. Byrne in a way offers his least convincing version when he tells Bernie to go because he brings the fear of the situation in his eyes even as he threatens Bernie to go and not come back.
Unfortunately for Tom, Bernie is as duplicitous as he seems as he almost immediately starts to make his presence known again, severely jeopardizing his scheme to make Caspar think that Tom is fully on his side. This is to the point Dane takes Tom back to the forest where he was supposed to kill Bernie to find a corpse, which Tom will be offered as the replacement if it is not found. In a way this is one of Tom’s most honest scenes because while Byrne still shows Tom keeping it close to chest, within that chest you see a man nearly petrified for his life as his whole expression in the scene is a man keenly aware he has no plays in the situation with Dane and is about to die. When Tom is saved last second because Caspar’s men find another corpse, murdered and placed there by Bernie, Tom’s relief as portrayed by Bernie is not of a cool composure rather this subdued yet potent combination of relief and even disbelief that he managed to survive this one. Although equally sloppy for Tom is when he runs into Bernie again, who blackmails him to kill Caspar, where Tom tries to get the drop on Bernie and Byrne’s physicality is great in the scene because you see the attempt from Tom to be the cold operator in the moment yet failing completely as Bernie instead trips and degrades Tom again. Where again Byrne doesn’t play it as particularly graceful, rather the Tom losing a bet and getting drunk as he sits on the ground.
What we then see is essentially Tom building the confidence in his biggest gamble which is to essentially get Caspar to kill the Dane then hope Caspar and Bernie kill each other. Byrne’s fantastic in presenting Tom getting basically into this flow state as he speaks every word so confidently as the truth as prods Caspar into believing his false story that the Dane has been conspiring against him, leading to the Dane’s death and even more easily getting Caspar to go his apartment where Bernie will be. Byrne’s fantastic because he manages to show the confidence of that performance, and the performance. I particularly love the way he very much whispers venom into Caspar’s ear as very much this move by Tom is so well realized by Byrne’s performance. This leaves only his greatest act as he leads to the ambush where Bernie kills Caspar leaving only Bernie to be dealt with. Byrne’s outstanding in the sequence because you see him playing the levels and really playing towards maybe his toughest mark in the exceedingly conniving Bernie. Byrne initially plays the man Bernie thinks he is, as he speaks openly it would seem, suggesting that they can pin Caspar’s murder on someone else, and playing in a way the old Tom who could never kill him. Byrne needs to convince both us and Bernie that he could get the gun away from him, and Byrne does by being the Tom who would only never scheme not kill. Once Tom has the gun though his whole demeanor changes, and before when Tom was trying to get the courage to kill Bernie essentially Byrne expressed the anxiety of someone with too much empathy to do it. Tom this time, aided by the truly wretched nature of Bernie, allows Tom to change to be truly cold and Byrne delivers in the real hollowness as now there’s no question if he can do it. The cherry on top being when Bernie again cries for his life, despite earlier claiming it to be an act, asking Tom to look into his heart, where we get the absolutely pitch perfect delivery from Byrne in the pure uncompromising moment of soulless determination as he replies “What heart?” before executing Bernie. We see the man Tom needs to become to finish his “smart play”, something Leo compliments him in the final, Bernie’s funeral, where we see Verna fully reject Tom and Leo’s intention to marry Verna. While not as cold as when he killed Bernie, Byrne exudes a changed manner in Tom, having a far more downplayed playfulness in his one liners, being altogether colder reflecting the man he needed to theoretically be to get back to the status quo. But as warm as Leo is towards him, we see in Tom/Byrne’s eyes that change as he essentially rejects Leo’s offer to come back. Byrne shows Tom brutally honest in rejecting the notion of being forgiven by Leo, where we sense both heartbreak in this but also a more pointed version of that old frustration towards his old friend. Tom chooses to remain where Byrne’s final expression powerfully presents the quiet sorrow of now truly solitary Tom where yet another bet has in the end made him again very little if perhaps nothing at all. Gabriel Byrne delivers a brilliant performance that gets better in every viewing where you see in his performance all the different angles Tom is playing, the fun of it, the thriller of it, but also the sadness of it as in every bit we see just a little more of just who Tom is behind it all.


117 comments:
Now only Malkovich left from the '98 Musketeers to yet get a five.
Louis: Any upgrades and could you possibly review Polito along with Dafoe and Farnsworth.
Amazing performance that does indeed get better with every viewing.
Hey guys
Say your update on Louis's predicted Top 10 lead actors of 1990:
1. Caan
2. Byrne
3. Lone
4. Rooker
5. Irons
6. Liotta
7. Patric
8. Leung
9. Cage
10. Pszoniak
Wouldn't be surprised if Byrne takes the win by the sound of this review. Very, very strong year.
Louis, do you have a top 10 of your favorite The Twilight Zone (original) performances?
Back in college, my girlfriend and I created a drinking game where we and our friends had to take a shot every time someone said "Jesus, Tom". Within 20 minutes everyone was sloshed.
RatedRStar: Love Taskmaster. What have been some of your favorite moments from the show over the years?
Man, seems like makers of Primetime were more insistent on full blown character assassination than nuance 🤣🤣.
Harris Marlowe: There are so many over so many series, ill give you 5 that I can think of off the top of my head.
1. Joe Wilkinson potato moment
2. James Acaster and Greg Davies box moment
3. Jessica Knappett falling off stage
4. Ed Gamble and David Baddiel team task on stage meltdown
5. Hugh Dennis having a sky appreciation subscription
What's your top 10 list of 1990?
RatedRStar: Thanks.
Anonymous: There's a link on the sidebar named "Top Tens" that you should acquaint yourself with, though he'll be updating the list once he finishes Lead.
Louis: Do you think you will add another shot from a film to your blog background?
With Digger AGI once again hedges his bet by accusing himself of the cinematic “crimes” he has indulged in similar to Bardo where he had a critic voice all his problems as a director, he does so once again here in saying that his satire is indeed over the top and ridiculous. But does admitting it make it better? Not really, probably makes it worse. Well really what makes it worse is that he also claims it’s funny…which it is not. It’s just loud and quickly tiresome. Where we then also are given a labored dramatic speech to know just how important it all is, and that its ridiculousness is important to the cathartic nature of such a piece. But really who cares, it isn’t entertaining, it isn’t biting, it's obvious, which can be okay if you’re funny but again it’s not. The separate human elements are insanely simplistic and add up to very little. Also with this, Mickey 17 and Don't Look Up, would the next filmmaker attempting political satire please note obviously fake looking teeth AREN'T FUNNY!!!
Huller - 2.5
Goodman - 2
Stuhlbarg - 2
Plemons - 2.5
D'Arcy - 3
Wilde - 2.5
I assume Riz Ahmed's MVP then.
Louis: Aw that is such a shame about the film but also about John Goodman, I think we were all originally so excited about him potentially finally getting an overdue Oscar Nomination but I'm afraid that is up in smoke now.
I tend to get more upset about this than most because I really am a huge advocate for actors getting their first Oscar nomination, especially if they are way overdue for one.
RatedRStar: Especially in Goodman's case, opportunities are getting fewer and fewer.
Luke, who do you think will be MVP of Primetime.
Anonymous: Gisondo. I'm revising my rating prediction from a 4 to a 4.5. and Pattinson from a 4 to a 3.5. Considering all the hype behind him this year, I'll be disappointed if Pattinson doesn't get a single five.
Now I know that the latter two still have the case going on for them, but it's still super disappointing to realize that this could've been the year with all members of The Coens' 3 (Goodman, Buscemi, Turturro) getting their first Oscar noms.
Luke, what ratings do you predict for Cruise & Ahmed?
Ytrewq: It unfortunately happens often during Oscar Season, we always get excited thinking an actor can finally get a nomination and then things change... a recent example.. Adam Sandler, I would have originally loved to see him finally recognised but then Jay Kelly comes out. Isn't very good and he surprisingly isn't good either.
Cruise - 3
Ahmed - 4/4.5
Luke: I am getting a bit worried about Best Actor now, two months ago I was really excited about it, I really hope Andrew Scott delivers.
RatedRStar: I'm not worried at all about Scott, Looks safe enough from the trailer I saw.
And for my Alternate lineup prediction, I'm swapping out Cruise for Mahershala Ali in Your Mother Your Mother Your Mother.
It kinda hasn't been a very good year for Best Actor, has it?
Matt: If by today's standards we have less than 8 fives then it's a disappointing year.
RatedRStar: I think he's been acclaimed to the point that you needn't worry.
Your thoughts on the script, cinematography and score of Miller's Crossing.
Do you know what was the saddest part of the Digger disappointment? Cruise won't be able to pull off the same feat as legends Charlie Chaplin, Henry Fonda, and Paul Newman: winning two different Oscars in consecutive years — first an honorary one, and then a competitive one.
so, with The Cruise probably not happening, and Robert Pattinson's chances seemingly going down ...
What are the odds for Ryan Gosling?
Your thoughts on the rest of the Primetime cast, Louis?
Tim: I think the window for him could be opening up again. Also, years ending in "6" might be a good luck charm for him in terms of Oscar nominations (Half Nelson in 2006 and La La Land in 2016.)
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Carolina Caroline.
Luke:
Got a bit more out of Freeman this time around and would move him up to a 3.5, as I do like how he plays his emotional connection with Mink as entirely genuine.
Anonymous:
How about a top five per season though important note I’ve seen many episodes but not every episode.
Season 1:
1. Gig Young - Walking Distance
2. Murray Hamilton - One For the Angels
3. Burgess Meredith - Time Enough At Last
4. Ed Wynn - One For the Angels
5. Cecil Kellaway - Elegy
Season 2:
1. William Shatner - Nick of Time
2. Art Carney - The Night of the Meek
3. Dick York - A Penny For Your Thoughts
4. Burgess Meredith - The Obsolete Man
5. Joseph Ruskin - The Man in the Bottle
Season 3:
1. Donald Pleasance - Changing of the Guard
2. Gladys Cooper - Nothing in the Dark
3. Robert Redford - Nothing in the Dark
4. Theodore Bikel - Four O’Clock
5. Joseph Schildkraut - The Trade-Ins
Season 4:
1. Dennis Hopper - He’s Alive
2. Pat Hingle - The Incredible World of Horace Ford
3. Martin Balsam - The New Exhibit
4. James Whitmore - On Thursday We Leave For Home
5. Robert Duvall - Miniature
Season 5:
1. Jack Klugman - In Praise of Pip
2. George Takei - The Encounter
3. Neville Brand - The Encounter
4. William Shatner - Nightmare At 20,000 Feet
5. Mickey Rooney - The Last Night of the Jockey
Lucas:
I stopped adding them because it has become almost impossible to see the next line beyond the first one, though I guess I should replace the third and a few of the later ones to change the repeats that are visible albeit just barely. At least this is from what I can see.
Anon:
The screenplay is one of the great screenplays from the Coens where they managed to devise both a send up and just also ideal execution of a 30/40’s gangster/noir film. A screenplay where I’ll admit I didn’t perfectly follow the plot the first time around, though I think part of that is the opening speech references Mink and Bernie before you know who they are and once you do it is actually surprising just how easy it becomes to follow it. There are many twists and turns within the idea of the double crosses and the great thing here is all the double crosses add up within Tom’s “smart play”. What makes it all the greater is how the double crosses are all connected and distinctly within each character that the Coens flesh out beautifully, I mean they even manage to do it for Mink despite his very limited screentime. I love that the villains technically are those who are holding to their codes, though criminal in nature, as the Dane is always right, never tricked by Tom truly, and does honestly care about Mink. Caspar does honestly believe in his idea of ethics even though his ethics are about fixing yet the realization is of a man who is true to his claim. Where Tom is able to play him by playing into that personal “purity” of his spirit. Conversely you have “our” guys Tom and Leo. Leo who is screwing over Caspar just because of Verna, Tom who knows that is wrong but is also sleeping with Verna. Verna who is sleeping with Leo to protect her brother, then maybe sleeping with Tom from genuine desire or not. Tom and Leo are honest friends, but Tom is sleeping with Verna, and Leo is also not listening to Tom. Bernie then is just the most horrible person in every regard who just wants to cheat to his heart content over everything and everyone. And even Mink who is earnestly afraid, but even that fear over his relationship causes his pivotal action. As precise as the plot, it is the flaws of each person that propels them in the mess and that is part of the brilliance. That isn’t even mentioning the great dialogue, with memorable lines and just gliding this line between comedic style per the period/style but also still being wholly convincing as actual people.
Barry Sonnenfeld’s cinematography does make one ponder a bit of what might’ve been if he hadn’t switched over to directing, given his last two films in this role, Misery and this film, are remarkable in that regard. Although of course Deakins replaced him so it is doubtful we’d have gotten better shot films from the Coens, but it is interesting to think about. Though regardless of what could’ve or could’ve not been, Miller’s Crossing is a beautifully shot film. There are really two types of shots that Sonnenfeld and the Coens pull off, one are the great exterior shots which have a lurid naturalistic quality in the lighting that for me very much evokes a specific type of fall weather. Brilliantly composed in the moments of creating the isolated figures, especially the titular scenes that are just striking in a way that evoke both period and a visceral place. The interior scenes though are as important, as theoretically there are a lot of scenes where people are just talking, yet everyone is shot dynamically by the trio, where there is particularly such a striking emphasis on creating the clarity of composition but also the dynamic nature particularly who is near who, behind who or with who. To have so many scenes of dialogue and to never seem dull is quite an achievement while somehow making it look easy.
The score is another amazing adapted score from Carter Burwell, which is why you won’t see it in my nominees because the main melody is lifted, but nonetheless an absolutely incredible use of the preexisting melody realized with such beauty in Burwell’s arrangement. There's a combination between this melancholy and majesty, where you are granted a really powerful sense of the dramatic nature of these figures we’re dealing with but an underlying sadness within the violence and real faults of every one of them. In terms of the purely original elements you do get that distinct Burwell mood music which is always striking and to the point. Relatively minimalist but effective to the point instantly creating a quick sense of dread or sudden doom.
Louis: What do you think of Steve Buscemi in these roles?
Abe Karatz
Bernie Rose
Bobby Hicks
Calvin: Can I get your rankings of the East of Eden cast?
Louis: Oh I'm aware it's an adapted score.
Thank you for the Twilight Zone rankings (some interesting choices). Would you mind writing a few quick words (a line is enough) for the performances or at least for your top choices as I am quite interested to hear your thought process?
Robert: Sure. Hurts to say I do agree with you to an extent on Abbott, I didn't dislike him as much but definitely one of his weakest performances.
1. Hoon Lee
2. Ciarán Hinds
3. Florence Pugh
4. Mike Faist
5. Martha Plimpton
6. Costa D'Angelo
7. Joseph Zada
8. Tracy Letts
9. Christopher Abbott
10. Tom Sweet
11. Joe Anders
12. Zoe Phillips
Also so glad for this upgrade and your overall love for the film. Assuming your thoughts on Turturro are the same, who would you have cast as Bernie? (though I like him more than you do).
I feel like Paul Reiser, Robert Downey Jr., or Mandy Patinkin could've been very good choices, Sean Penn on a good day, Rick Moranis maybe for a big swing that could've landed or not. Or hey, Buscemi himself maybe.
Calvin: your ratings for the casts of The Uprising, Primetime, and Forgotten Island?
Anonymous:
Wever - (The role itself is extremely standard as the producer who is driving for the number 1. Regardless, Wever is good in conveying a certain charisma of confidence of someone who is very assured in her ability to get things done. She delivers on that even though her arc of being concerned then not being concerned is honestly so simplistically written there’s not too much to do with it. She’s more than fine though in portraying a quick bit of frustration that then switches essentially to her satisfaction with own abilities.)
Maher - (Why oh why has he become a go to character actor as he always manages to overact at least a little, this is no different, not an especially terrible version of it but not a change in the trend either.)
Faris - (Totally one note role, she’s okay with that one note.)
Woodbine - (Just your run of the mill over the top “Sheriff” type of performance.)
Winter - (Actually effective enough for his very brief bit in one presenting the overly confident attorney type then just a strange drifting vocal manner of someone who is all over the place in their mind.)
Bridgers - (As the voice of discontent entirely delivers on that as well as her quick bits of acting the decoy bits. Doesn't have too much to work with but is good with what she has.)
Revolori - (Like Winter finds a reality of the immediate scene of the man suddenly caught and going through a range of messy emotions.)
Bratton - (Brings an effective viciousness in his quick bit.)
Luke:
Weaving - 4.5(Manages to really enliven every aspect of the film by providing the initial combination between the building thrill of her crimes along with the sense of very real frustration and some wistful hope for something other than her existence. Finding then great chemistry with Gallner where the two manage to in part show the direct thrill of the moment with the charged lust around, yet also show genuine moments of quiet connection that are as real between them, finding a sense of fun in moments of bickering while bringing that charge of their attraction for one another. Then in the process of becoming the criminal, finding the moments of real fun she is having at becoming better at the crimes, bringing the intensity when needing to be the robber, yet convincingly presenting her moments of desperate hesitations when she feels she is going too far in the moment. She brings this consistent spark towards every scene where she finds the honesty of the sense of escape, the reality of her real love, yet also the nagging element of the personal distress that truly propels her throughout.)
Gallner - 4(He is less focused overall within the scheme of the film, but like Strange Darling in a way he is a good facilitator for his co-star to have the more dynamic role. Gallner brings a genuine charisma where he manages to balance a natural combination between just real disarming warm charm with the sense of a certain danger about him. He’s particularly good in presenting the turning on and turning off of those instincts of the man living as a criminal for some time, even while showing the man beneath it all who does love this woman even if they’re both gripped by the same desire for the shortcut.)
Gries - 3.5(I liked the genuine warmth he brought in the overall somewhat lost dad yet very earnest in his manner towards his daughter regardless. I particularly liked his vocal work over the phone trying to basically ease the pain of dealing with her mother where Gries makes it all real of a dad trying to soften the obvious pains created from the past.)
Sedgwick - 3.5(Appropriately horrible in her scene as I did like how she brings a sense of wanting to have fun initially it is only when her daughter reveals the truth, switching immediately to a callous indifference of someone who revels in the idea of rejecting any and all responsibility.)
Anonymous:
Young - (A moving portrayal of essentially a painful nostalgia.)
Shatner - (I’ll say his brand of acting works for the heightened tone of the series anyways, but Nick of Time is an especially ideal use. Shatner's brand in a way very much sells the concept of the instant obsession, and Shatner one of a kind of strange intensity works perfectly for the concept.)
Pleasance - (More of a showcase than many episodes and Pleasance makes use of it as a man finding meaning in his life.)
Hopper - (The full on intensity where Hopper brings all the desperation but also fiery fearmongering needed for a wannabe dictator.)
Klugman - (For the quick switch brings the cynical quality before immediately being an emotional wreck that he powerfully delivers on.)
Harris:
Karatz - (Ideal role for Buscemi honestly as he has that hangdog quality, while also could bring enough of a little bit of shade to allude to the character’s not entirely on the level past.)
Rose - (I mean sure however I’d assume it would be a variation on Nucky essentially, which would work.)
Bobby - (I mean Buscemi has I think a similar ability to be off-beat but can be sincere like Dafoe, so yeah. Although I feel like the warmer qualities Dafoe brings out might not come out as strongly.)
Calvin:
I mean theoretically Turturro on a good day as well, and I don’t entirely hate his performance, it's just the pure evil Bernie I just don’t buy. Probably would say Buscemi and would be fine with the pure swap, as Turturro’s desperation is what I believed most and Mink is pure desperation.
I have no problem with Turturro's performance.
Could you watch Paris is Burning next for 1990?
Could you watch The Exorcist III next for 1990?
Anonymous: He'll watch it later for Dourif's review.
hiiiiiiiii
Bryan L: No worries if not, but are you okay with giving ratings for performances, and if so, could you give them for the cast of Digger?
Has anyone watched Lioness, thoughts, cast rankings?
(On any or all seasons)
Harris: I'll cop out and say the same as Louis's, with a 3 for Ahmed and a 3.5 for Cruise.
(I mentally checked out halfway through though.)
Can’t wait to see your Lanterns review! I predict Chandler at #1.
(Still gotta catch up though! LOL!)
Louis: Your thoughts on the cast of The Rivals of Amziah King?
I thoroughly *loved* Lanterns, way more than I ever even expected to. I thought they manage to ground the idea of Green Lantern perfectly while still never forgetting the alien, the magic and the comic book elements. It's kind of the perfect example of how to do one of these things, an it's all brought together by the trio of great performances at the center, although one performer is the particular MVP.
Cast ranking:
1. Kyle Chandler
2. Kelly MacDonald
3. Aaron Pierre
4. Nathan Fillion
5. Garret Dillahunt
6. Chris Coy
7. Paul Ben-Victor
8. Ulrich Thomsen
9. J. Alphonse Nicholson
10. Jasmine Cephas-Jones
11. Shea Pritchard
12. Poorna Jagannathan
13. Jason Ritter
14. Hannah Christine Shetler
15. Laura Linney (Although she's not awful by any means, but she always feels just a little off for some reason)
RatedRStar: Your top 5 favorite individual tasks on Taskmaster, in terms of how the contestants executed them?
Harris: Which would you like, tasks that were really well done or ones that went horribly wrong for the individual?
Tasks that went horribly wrong, please.
RIP Eva Marie Saint
RIP Eva Marie Saint
Gone is the last of the oldest surviving Oscar winning actors.
Harris Marlowe: From what I can remember off the top of my head.
1. Claudia Winkelman for attempting to use a 420cm pole, to run through an obstacle course, hitting virtually everything numerous times.
2. Desiree Burch attempting to pop a balloon with every bought item and missing every single attempt and then losing more time for buying the scissors which then also didn't cut right away.
3. Ardal O'Hanlon trying to find the right shoe and then throwing it out of the window, he also claimed he could find the shoe without asking questions and then proceeded to ask a bunch of them.
4. Iain Sterling trying to move sand from one bucket to the other, breaking every single rule which the task said not to do, which was touching the sand and the buckets.
5. Sophie Willian trying to throw hula hoops onto a moving object on the river then struggling to survive in the water when she walks through it.
RIP Eva Marie Saint
RIP Eva Marie Saint. As sentimental as it may sound, it saddens me whenever one of the surviving Golden Age stars passes away.
RIP Eva Marie Saint
Oh My goodness! Rest In Peace Eva Marie Saint. 102 years. What a blessing!
RIP Eva Marie Saint.
RIP Eva Marie Saint.
Louis, your present day roles for Robert Shaw?
My sentiments exactly.
R.I.P. Eva Marie Saint
Luke, who do you think will be Louis' choice for Best Actress.
Anonymous: Julianne Moore in The Debut or Sandra Huller in Rose.
RIP Eva Marie Saint
Could I get your thoughts on Cooke and D'Arcy in this scene from HOTD? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qillYsPzEs0
RIP Eva Marie Saint
Louis: thoughts on the trailer for The Exorcist: Martyrs?
Regarding the Social Reckoning:
Speaks to the magic trick of filmmaking in a way that in one way the same trick can look brilliant and another it’s a guy holding a card in-between his fingers. That’s the case here where technically Sorkin employs so many of the same things he does in so many of his films, where he wants to craft heroes, specific idiosyncrasies of his protagonists that force them bounce off each other, one liners to create a button on a scene or some truly random aside. He did that before successfully, he does so here unsuccessfully. Yes, part of it is that Sorkin is the director again, a role that does not serve him well both in terms of his own technique but also the elimination of a second voice to round off his excesses and amplify his virtues. Where his settings seem either dully passive, where the comedic timing becomes especially clunky, or excessively dramatic, where yes we do get a triumphant choral piece and, which was my favorite moment in the film for the unintentional comedy, where we get a militant theme when Frances meets Zuckerberg that gives off the vibes as though we’re meeting Hitler in the scene.
But even if you had Fincher, or even Boyle, I don’t think they could’ve made this a great movie, probably not even a good one, even if it would be better than this one. As yes they might’ve made the joke less of lead balloons, they might’ve gotten some re-writes for the better, like maybe not having the Frances wearing sexy dresses as a disguise, which was probably one of the most ludicrous bits I’ve seen in a film recently just for the sake of getting Mikey Madison essentially back into her Anora style wardrobe. However, they still would’ve been working with Sorkin trying to craft a neat little package out of a story that decidedly is not one. Yes his fastball is slower in terms of his wit here regardless, but the core of this one is just fundamentally rotten in trying to treat this topic as something that can be cured with just a few good men or women, with a few quippy one liners and maybe a quirk or two.
White - 2.5
Madison - 3.5
Burr - 3.5
Mosaku - 3
Magnussen - 3.5
Gilpin - 2
Louis: I assume you never watched Sonic SatAM?
Hey Louis
If Fincher had agreed to direct the sequel and had Eisenberg as Zuckerberg, what would the cast have been?
Lanterns I found to be pretty good with some conveniences and character decisions that maybe kept it from true greatness for me, along with a finale that I thought tied things up well enough however not in a way that sort of elevated to something amazing. I will also say the killer’s explanation didn’t quite earn the “let’s let em go” response for me. Still as superhero shows go, definitely one of the best with some great moments throughout, particularly just every interaction between Hal and John. They carry the series to the point I do hope that they find a way to carry on the dynamic if there’s a season 2.
1. Kyle Chandler
2. Kelly MacDonald
3. Aaron Pierre
4. Paul Ben-Victor
5. Ulrich Thomsen
6. Chris Coy
7. Nathan Fillion
8. J. Alphonse Nicholson
9. Garret Dillahunt
10. Jasmine Cephas Jone
11. Shea Pritchard
12. Laura Linney
13. Poorna Jagannathan
14. Hannah Christine Shelter
15. Jason Ritter
Anon:
McConaughey - (Giving one of his most McConaugheying performances he’s ever given, where there is just an intensity about everything he does but specifically with that very specific energy of his. In this instance, rather than say in Wolf, it is that of a benevolent sort however similar in style in the way of just being so sincerely pure in his manner. McConaughey’s performance manages to sell the overt style of the film just because he is owning it all with his own performance where he does manage to find some style that is endearing to a degree. This carries the film to the degree he can…for as long as he can.)
Russell - (Not really given all that much to do other than just stand around and look menacing. He does that. He is given really one scene where he offers a nice bit of charisma with the shades of darkness beneath that surface effectively.)
Lookingglass - (A terrible role as mostly she’s asked just to look innocent and optimistic. She theoretically does this but it feels so thin and ridiculous at a certain point. Amplified by what her character ends up doing yet she maintains the same manner nearly the whole time to the point of comical ludicrousness. She does have one scene when talking about her past where she does convey more genuine emotion yet it feels so different that it feels like a different character only reinforcing how limited the rest of the character/performance is.)
Morgan - (Standard sort of “Stable presence” performance from him. He does fine with it but not really the biggest challenge.)
Shepherd - (A fine Boomhauer impression that is one of the few big style swings in the film that I did feel worked, largely because Shepherd goes for it and is consistent with it.)
Anonymous:
Well I guess doing various horror movies is one way for Ejiofor to get prominent roles at least. Otherwise it seems like an interesting enough angle to go at the material from with serial killers, while technically going into the original’s crime story that becomes a super natural setup. I seem to find more flaws with Flanagan’s work in general than most, but this at least is compelling enough, though I do think it could easily go either way.
Harris:
Not regarding the performances, it is a shame that the writers seem to totally have forgotten about this scene with Alicent's “yeah kill my kids I don’t care” attitude in seasons 2 and 3. But D’Arcy and Cooke are great in the scene in portraying the level of viciousness in their emotions. One that represents the scene but even more. In that the levels they bring in sort of the emotive tension and exhaustion of each interaction speaks not of just two people at each other's throats, but two people in that position who were once so close. They’re particularly great at the build of it where D’Arcy wonderfully plays the certainty of the lie Rhaenyra has told with even a sense of the privilege of being the daughter of the king, against the slow frustrations of Alicent, where Cooke’s reactions are that of “do we really need to pretend” before eventually boiling over fully into the rage.
8000’s:
Did see some random episodes back in the day that I remember nothing from.
Shaggy:
Well having now seen the film I’m frankly glad Eisenberg turned it down not just due to the film’s overall quality but how thin the Zuckerberg role is this time around. It isn’t a continuation of the character from the first film, he’s instead just a vague generalized impression. The rest of the cast I could theoretically see Fincher direct, though I do think maybe he would’ve argued for someone who actually was representative of Frances Haughen’s actual age or general appearance. Although the whole re-written age part of the character is definitely fundamental to how Sorkin decided to approach the material.
Louis: What are your thoughts on the cast of Digger, unless you want to hold off on that?
Luke, rating prediction for Jeremy Strong in The Social Reckoning.
1.5/2
Lucas:
I feel I should wait a bit longer, unless everyone who hasn't seen it doesn't care about spoilers at this point.
Wildwood has been getting rave reviews. Should be winning Animated Feature.
How's Madison in TSR, unless you want to wait on that too?
Hi Luke, I might consider recommending Paranorman in December. Wildwood's trailers really struck a chord with me that I think Laika should be celebrated for their success.
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Brad Pitt in Heart Of The Beast.
Louis: What are your ratings and thoughts on J. K. Simmons and Anna Lambe in Heart of the Beast, and Cole Sprouse, Jake Horowitz, and Tony Revolori in The Rivals of Amziah King?
Louis, thoughts on the cast of Lanterns?
Louis: Do you intend on catching up on 2026 releases before moving onto Supporting.
I’m liking the positive early reviews for “Wildwood”!
I think Carey Mulligan could be a dark horse for the Supporting Actress win if it's a fiveless year.
And it might be our first ever animated Production Design winner.
Louis: Do you intend to watch the recently annouced Darkwing Duck reboot?
i just saw the film Reign Over Me, a movie that has always been on my periphery which i had been excited to see for quite a while now ...
too bad it's horrible.
Sandler - 2.5 (the .5 is literally just for ONE scene)
Cheadle - 2.5
Smith - 2
Tyler - 2
Burrows - 1.5
Sutherland - 3
Dillon - 2
Novak - 1.5
This movie legitimately made me angry
RIP RJ Mitte. Incredibly tragic, and so young.
RIP RJ Mitte
RIP RJ Mitte
Rest In Peace RJ Mitte. Goodness.
RIP RJ Mitte.
RIP RJ Mitte.
R.I.P. RJ Mitte
RIP RJ Mitte. Just tragic.
RIP RJ Mitte
Luke, which 2026 animated films would make your films to watch list for Louis.
Anonymous:
Wildwood
Ray Gunn
Forgotten Island
Shaun The Sheep: The Beast Of Mossy Bottom
Hoppers
Hexed (If it's 80% or higher on RT)
Iron Boy
Tangles
Rest Easy, RJ Mitte.
Louis: Thoughts on The Magician's Nephew trailer.
Dang, you beat me to it!
I have felt really hollowed out lately by couple of celebrity losses over the past 2 years.... but even then young deaths and especially suicides fuck me up even worse. If wishes came true, would wish for a world where no feels suicidal anymore. If anyone is here is going through something, I pray for ease.
Luke:
Pitt - 4(A good leading man performance from him that really is most successful in creating such a real connection with the dog. Pitt manages to capture the warmth of it but also the guarded connection of the two being both deeply wounded creatures. The moments that just devote fully to the two truly bonding Pitt finds a real heart to every moment of it and an earned warmth. Unfortunately there’s a few places where it could’ve pushed further and I honestly think this could’ve been a truly great performance from him. Unfortunately it settles to a certain point with the fairly repetitive survival scenes, but Pitt is good consistently.)
Lucas:
Simmons - 3(Simmons is a quick wise old man bit. He delivers in bringing a slight variation as more of a mountain man presence offering enough of a combination between a wise warmth but also his own beaten down quality.)
Lambe - (She’s in the movie.)
Sprouse and Horowitz - (Honestly feels like they could’ve been a merged character though they are both fine in offering a little emotional depth in mostly expository performances.)
Revolori - (He’s there just for a quick visceral bit and he delivers on that visceral reaction and comedic surprise well enough.)
J96:
Maybe narrow the list down a bit.
Ytrewq:
Maybe if it goes above and beyond.
Jonathan:
I thought the first part of the trailer was quite magical, then it was full Flash Gordon and was a little taken aback, though not necessarily in a bad way. Gerwig is definitely making her own stamp on the material unlike the earlier films, and looks like it could work out to something special, though there is always the chance it won’t as well.
Louis: Thoughts on your top 7 for the Lanterns cast.
Post a Comment