Michel Simon did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Monsieur Hire in Panique.
Panique follows an eccentric outsider as he gets slowly set up to take the fall of a murder by the murderer and his accomplice girlfriend.
Simon honestly doesn’t play a role too far removed from his work with Jean Renoir in La Chienne. Where both films are essentially setups for one man to be treated cruelly by a couple with the woman acting as a black widow to ensnare the unsuspecting man. A key word in both instances however is unsuspecting, not innocent. We first really see Hire from a bit of a distance as a potentially suspicious man as the film opens with the murder of a woman and the whole town wondering who might be the culprit. We see Hire lurking about and Simon in a way creates the potential doubt where the man is knowingly looking on in these moments and it seems like he knows something. Well he does know something as a new woman comes into town, Alice (Viviane Romance), who has already helped the actual murderer, Alfred (Paul Bernard), cover up a different murder before even coming to see him as a false stranger so they can be together while avoiding police suspicion. Simon plays directly a creep figure as he leers at Alice from his window then even approaches her the following day, in no way trying to soften those elements. Although one can argue a noble effort that Hire wants to warn her about Alfred, because he knows for sure that Alfred is the killer, since Hire knows it becomes a strange game he is also playing given he could easily turn over his evidence to the police at any time that he claims to have. Simon though is effective and convincing in presenting the strangeness in a very tangible way where you never doubt that Hire would proceed in this way as the man just has his own way about life and interacting with others.
The film then progresses as Alice is instructed to ingratiate herself with Hire to eventually plant evidence of the murder, meanwhile Alfred spreads rumors around about the already disliked Hire to try to get the town to turn on him. In their interactions Simon manages an artful combination between some genuine pathos as he describes with this accepted manner his own life as an outsider in all places, while holding this cheery disposition when speaking of his own wife who died. In those moments Simon is quietly moving, although at the same time he does bring a certain overbearing quality in moments that again emphasize that eccentricity in ways that are less endearing. While we know Alice is manipulative, and the real reason why she’s there, Simon very much presents a certain obliviousness even with some bits of creepiness as the man is just fascinated by this woman who is bothering to give him the time of day. I haven’t said it in awhile but this film is a bit of a director’s film where the overall vision is most pronounced and to a certain point the characters are more so puzzle pieces in that tapestry more than fully coming to life beyond it. At a certain point Hire is given less time, particularly in the lead up to the climax, although he returns for the climax where Simon certainly is moving and makes his whole scene of becoming a pariah hard to watch. Simon emphasizing just the confusion of the moment that turns to fear and just the final sorrow in his eyes is heartbreaking. There is however a certain limitation by the nature of the script however and by comparison the similar role in La Chienne had more he could sink his teeth into, no pun intended. It’s a good performance as Simon creates the tragedy both in terms of showing why people might not trust Hire, why Hire might conceal his knowledge of the murder, but also how he still is a victim regardless.
Panique follows an eccentric outsider as he gets slowly set up to take the fall of a murder by the murderer and his accomplice girlfriend.
Simon honestly doesn’t play a role too far removed from his work with Jean Renoir in La Chienne. Where both films are essentially setups for one man to be treated cruelly by a couple with the woman acting as a black widow to ensnare the unsuspecting man. A key word in both instances however is unsuspecting, not innocent. We first really see Hire from a bit of a distance as a potentially suspicious man as the film opens with the murder of a woman and the whole town wondering who might be the culprit. We see Hire lurking about and Simon in a way creates the potential doubt where the man is knowingly looking on in these moments and it seems like he knows something. Well he does know something as a new woman comes into town, Alice (Viviane Romance), who has already helped the actual murderer, Alfred (Paul Bernard), cover up a different murder before even coming to see him as a false stranger so they can be together while avoiding police suspicion. Simon plays directly a creep figure as he leers at Alice from his window then even approaches her the following day, in no way trying to soften those elements. Although one can argue a noble effort that Hire wants to warn her about Alfred, because he knows for sure that Alfred is the killer, since Hire knows it becomes a strange game he is also playing given he could easily turn over his evidence to the police at any time that he claims to have. Simon though is effective and convincing in presenting the strangeness in a very tangible way where you never doubt that Hire would proceed in this way as the man just has his own way about life and interacting with others.
The film then progresses as Alice is instructed to ingratiate herself with Hire to eventually plant evidence of the murder, meanwhile Alfred spreads rumors around about the already disliked Hire to try to get the town to turn on him. In their interactions Simon manages an artful combination between some genuine pathos as he describes with this accepted manner his own life as an outsider in all places, while holding this cheery disposition when speaking of his own wife who died. In those moments Simon is quietly moving, although at the same time he does bring a certain overbearing quality in moments that again emphasize that eccentricity in ways that are less endearing. While we know Alice is manipulative, and the real reason why she’s there, Simon very much presents a certain obliviousness even with some bits of creepiness as the man is just fascinated by this woman who is bothering to give him the time of day. I haven’t said it in awhile but this film is a bit of a director’s film where the overall vision is most pronounced and to a certain point the characters are more so puzzle pieces in that tapestry more than fully coming to life beyond it. At a certain point Hire is given less time, particularly in the lead up to the climax, although he returns for the climax where Simon certainly is moving and makes his whole scene of becoming a pariah hard to watch. Simon emphasizing just the confusion of the moment that turns to fear and just the final sorrow in his eyes is heartbreaking. There is however a certain limitation by the nature of the script however and by comparison the similar role in La Chienne had more he could sink his teeth into, no pun intended. It’s a good performance as Simon creates the tragedy both in terms of showing why people might not trust Hire, why Hire might conceal his knowledge of the murder, but also how he still is a victim regardless.


56 comments:
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.
The Best Years of Our Lives cast ratings:
Andrews-4.5
March-4.5
Russell-5
Wright-5
Loy-4.5
O'Donnell-3.5(Mostly for her big scene with Russell )
Mayo-3.5
Carmichael-3
George-3
Bohren-3.5
Collins-3
Baldwin-3.5
Hall-2.5
Luke & Tahmeed: Welp...so much for Netherlands to win it all...
1. Boyer
2. Redgrave
3. Interlenghi
4. Simon
5. Greenstreet
Bryan: I'll take the Germans going home as consolation.
Bryan: Glad Cody Gakpo got his goal at least after the week he's had.
Going out on penalties is always terrible, and I never want to see another stutter step penalty again.
Tahmeed: I despise that too. Your just allowing the keeper more time to figure out which direction the ball's gonna go.
Luke: Out of curiosity, has Louis directly said if he's doing bonus rounds on the 2020s? And do you know if he plans to do anything with pre-1928 films?
Harris: Both after 1928 to 2019 are completed.
OK, thanks.
Dom: My understanding is that the first review is the last time you can change your prediction.
RIP Michael Byrne
RIP Michael Byrne
"And this is how we say goodbye in Germany, Dr. Jones"
RIP Michael Byrne
R.I.P. Michael Byrne
Most effective Grindelwald we've had
RIP Michael Byrne
Harris: I didn't know that, I'll keep that in mind next time I make any new predictions for whenever is the next year that'll be covered
Louis: Could you add my previously proposed question to the FAQ, unless you have any objections? It's under the last post.
Louis: Asking as someone who's generally against AI as a creative tool, what is your personal position on its usage in the film industry beyond the voice editing we've discussed?
Hey guys!
Tell us your ranks of 1946 nominees in each category:
Song
1. "On the Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe" - The Harvey Girls
2. "You Keep Coming Back Like a Song" - Blue Skies
3. "I Can't Begin to Tell You" - The Dolly Sisters
4. "All Through the Day" - Centennial Summer
5. "Ole Buttermilk Sky" - Canyon Passage
Score - Musical
1. The Harvey Girls
2. Night and Day
3. Centennial Summer
4. Blue Skies
5. The Jolson Story
Score - Drama or Comedy
1. Henry V
2. The Best Years of Our Lives
3. Anna and the King of Siam
4. The Killers
5. Humoresque
Sound
1. It's a Wonderful Life
2. The Best Years of Our Lives
3. The Jolson Story
Editing
1. It's a Wonderful Life
2. The Killers
3. The Best Years of Our Lives
4. The Yearling
5. The Jolson Story
Visual Effects
1. Blithe Spirit
2. A Stolen Life
Production Design (B&W)
1. Kitty
2. Anna and the King of Siam
3. The Razor's Edge
Production Design (Color)
1. The Yearling
2. Henry V
3. Caesar and Cleopatra
Cinematography (B&W)
1. Anna and the King of Siam
2. The Green Years
Cinematography (Color)
1. The Yearling
2. The Jolson Story
Motion Picture Story
1. Vacation From Marriage
2. The Strange Love of Martha Ivers
3. The Stranger
4. To Each His Own
5. The Dark Mirror
Adapted Screenplay
1. Brief Encounter
2. The Best Years of Our Lives
3. Rome, Open City
4. The Killers
5. Anna and the King of Siam
Original Screenplay
1. Children of Paradise
2. Notorious
3. The Seventh Veil
4. The Blue Dahlia
5. Road to Utopia
Supporting Actress
1. Anne Baxter
2. Lillian Gish
3. Ethel Barrymore
4. Gale Sondergaard
5. Flora Robson
Supporting Actor
1. Claude Rains
2. Harold Russell
3. Charles Coburn
4. Clifton Webb
5. William Demarest
Lead Actress
1. Celia Johnson
2. Rosalind Russell
3. Olivia de Havilland
4. Jane Wyman
5. Jennifer Jones
Lead Actor
1. James Stewart
2. Fredric March
3. Laurence Olivier
4. Gregory Peck
5. Larry Parks
Director
1. Frank Capra
2. David Lean
3. William Wyler
4. Robert Siodmak
5. Clarence Brown
Picture
1. It's a Wonderful Life
2. The Best Years of Our Lives
3. The Yearling
4. Henry V
5. The Razor's Edge
Louis: Do you have any updated thoughts on Geraldine Page in Hondo since you gave her a 4.5 in your last ranking and had given her a 3.5 before? And what are your rating and thoughts on John Wayne in the film?
Luke: It’s on……(🇲🇽 🇬🇧)
Harry Kane was incredible today btw.
Bryan: Congrats on your victory in advance. Mexico will not let England off lightly after that performance.
And with all due respect to Congo, England shouldn't be struggling against them.
Luke: I don't mind the odd surprise in the World Cup but I do generally like most of the big teams to be in the later stages, have those epic star power filled matches, that's why I didn't really want both Germany and The Netherlands to lose so early.
RatedRStar: If we don't get a France V Argentina rematch in the final, I'll be sorely disappointed.
Luke: I think its possibly my annoyance at the 48 teams, because it feels like their aren't many...must see matches, like I hoped Germany would beat Paraguay simply because it would be Germany Vs France, which I always thought was one of the draws of the World Cup was seeing giants collide.
France should make the final and it'll either be Argentina or Norway from the other side of the draw. I don't think Brazil are good enough to beat the former at least.
RatedRStar: You'll always get those matches in the Euros and Germany would've been slaughtered by France. Rather a closely contested match than a rout.
I saw Scream 7 btw a mostly supportive fan of the franchise...hated it lol.
Makes Scream 3 seem underrated by comparison.
Luke: Even the Euros being expanded has a similar problem, give me 2012 vibes with Germany, Portugal and Netherlands being in the same group lol.
I think it's comfortably France's World Cup to lose. Olise is a magical player, but if they go all the way, Mbappe will definitely get the plaudits.
But yes, Brazil v Norway and England v Mexico will be amazing to watch. Kane's been easily the best in the world this season for me, hope he and England break the 6 decade drought.
Agree with everything here, down to the limitations of the role, but I'm glad you liked him.
Louis: I saw Orders to Kill (which I loved, thanks for the hidden gem recommendation), could I have your thoughts on Anthony Asquith's direction (very atypical to his usual style but in an effective way), and the screenplay? The writing behind Leonie and Lafitte ends up being such a masterstroke to the proceedings.
Also, a 2020s Orders to Kill directed by Bennett Miller
Gene: Garrett Wareing
Major MacMahon: Damian Lewis
Leonie: Rhea Seehorn
Lafitte:...this one is tough
Luke:
Romance - 4(She hits her major notes well enough with being swept up with the questionable man she’s with, then playing the notes of being manipulated while maybe questioning it a bit in the back of her mind. She’s good with Simon in playing between the lines the degree of her own manipulation between moments of maybe genuine sympathy while also playing other moments of hiding a certain disgust. Then her final reactions are also effective.)
Bernard - 3.5(Basically sticks to one note of just pompous disregard though with this smoothness in essentially his own callousness. It works though in that he is convincing in his manipulations even as he is so aggressively detestable.)
Tony:
I think it’s bad for many reasons. One reason is that it squeezes the industry all the more and therefore limits the opportunities of those people who maybe need their chance to show their talents but never get the job or position they need because AI is going to get it. Two the actual quality of most AI is hackneyed trash at best, but even in something like research AI has shown to be confidently incorrect that is likely to lead to error if people truly want to save time since one needs to double check everything to begin with. People will argue that low budget filmmakers could benefit, thoughI think one can even argue this point quite easily, but the truth is it is the studios more than anything that will want to exploit it to the most adverse of impacts. There are even more reasons but those are a few industry specific ones.
Lucas:
No just rating was a bit low in reflection of my feelings. It is a midrange Wayne performance, mostly just his presence, decent example of it, but not great.
Calvin:
Glad you enjoyed it, always loved discovering a film like that.
Asquith’s direction is quite a leap in fact from his stage adaptations for example, though he was quite effective at those as well, but the whole film obviously is of a different intention. Where I think Asquith is successful in very much bringing us into the stage of the mental state of the mission, and I do love that opening shot. Where in the early scenes it does seem like a man on a mission film, and successful in really giving time to show the important steps in that set up, though with just enough signs of potential darkness like the opening shot. Then there’s the first shift where you have that taught tension of a spy thriller where you feel the intensity of the spy mission and the secrecy of the world operating. But most impressive is one more shift towards such surprising, yet earned, brutality particularly in the “completing the mission” scene which he depicts in such a matter of fact way, but a way that makes it all the more painful by how tangible it all is. The screenplay and the direction I think are a particularly strong match as such and it is interesting how it sets itself up more so as maybe this will be a more routine, though good, war film, and essentially the rest of the film is ripping that away. There is great use of a “blank slate” character where we take a good soldier, train him, and slowly remove optimism, then really slowly remove mental stability and it is a fascinating deconstruction. The intention of the screenplay I think wisely though brings us into each phase, with the detailed oriented nature of the training, but then also the the immediate complication of the mission where it is great in showing the different harrowing details of dealing with the darkness of espionage. Before taking that last step where it humanizes the target so much, that you can’t help but second guess, and making the choice that the info was wrong makes it all the more brutal.
Maybe Denis Menochet? Miller would be a great choice for the material.
Louis: Have you ever watched, or plan on watching Song of the South?
Louis: In general, would you say career-best performances by actors are more likely to be in their established type or against type?
So, idk if any of you guys were desperate to know this, but the last season of The Bear is fine. I didn't buy the hyperbolic "return to form" praise, but it's at least on par with S4.
There's still some episodes where little happens, some are a bit padded out with flashbacks, some Fak gags that don't land (though thankfully not too many), but there's at least 2 strong episodes that are worth getting to.
Not crazy about the finale, but it's a decent ending with more than a couple of satisfying moments. Though it sucks the show just never quite reached the heights of S2 again.
Louis: Your thoughts on Mickey Mouse and the Mad Doctor.
Lucas:
I've seen it.
Marcus:
Well I guess it depends on where subversion of type goes in such a distinction where maybe it uses aspects of the expected type in unexpected ways which I would say is found in several career bests as well.
8000's:
Properly creepy in a way that could've only been realized in that period of animation where you get truly deranged elements from the mad doctor's plan, to the truly unpleasant nature of cutting the shadow or where it leaves Mickey. Of course it has "it was all a dream" but what a great nightmare it is before then.
8000S: Out of curiosity, does the S in your username stand for anything in particular? Or is it just another way of typing "eight thousands"?
Luke, Bryan: That was the game of the World Cup so far, brilliant from both England and Mexico.
Tahmeed: It was objectively a great game indeed.
Luke: Best of luck the rest of the way mate. I’ll be glad if Harry and the blokes can bring it home.
At least the USA is still alive, but I was more invested in Mexico. Welp.
Didn't think they would show that much grit and determination against such adverse conditions but fair play to them and the manager.
Having said that, Haaland will be a nightmare to contain.
Louis: agree on Bill Skarsgard being woefully miscast in Dead Man's Wire, who would you have cast instead? I think I'd have gone for Scoot McNairy, or maybe even David Krumholtz if they wanted someone closer to the real guy.
Louis: Do you think you'll watch Dark Matter with Joel Edgerton and Widow's Bay on Apple TV? I finished watching them and thought they were both great
Tony: I think you mean Belgium, but either way, yep.
Both my horses are out now, so I’m rooting Haaland or Kane to win it all now.
Yes, a laughable performance from the US against Belgium. That third goal in particular was pathetic.
Of course one can't draw out these conclusions just yet, but could Pattinson get 5 for both Dune and The Odyssey??
Perfectionist: Possibly though I think Dune 3 has more win potential.
Calvin:
Either of those choices could've worked, particularly Krumholtz as I feel there would be a lot more power if you had the genuine visual of just very much a random guy you might see anywhere having this mental breakdown.
I could also see Angus Sampson, James Badge Dale or John Gallagher Jr. as alternatives as well.
Lucas:
Well I won't NOT watch them.
Post a Comment