Mads Mikkelsen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tonny in Pusher II.
Pusher II is a unique sequel that changes protagonists to one of the supporting characters from the first film, while also including other key characters from that film.
The great Mads Mikkelsen was that supporting character in the first film and honestly the standout, albeit very briefly, in that film as the joyful and manic buddy of the main character, who leaves poor Tonny beaten. We jump into Tonny’s story within prison where he is awaiting release and we see a very different man from the one we saw in the original film. Mikkelsen however did not forget how to play Tonny rather what we sense is the experience of life on his character and his performance here being a natural extension of that. The signs of the more manic Tonny are in and around moments in Mikkelsen’s performance, as when he gets excited in the few moments that he is allowed of that, we see that same zest for life with perhaps foolishness in so firmly buying into the notion for a moment, such as when we see Tonny steal a car thinking it will be an impressive act. Beyond that however we see a man having gotten more than a few lessons from life, someone who most certainly was beaten by his best friend and has spent a few years in prison. Mikkelsen wears this history within him from his opening scene, where there’s the glint of an old smile but even that is something quickly drifting off when faced with the reality of his life.
We follow Tonny as he leaves prison and attempts to reconnect with his small-time crime boss father the duke. A scene that is all about Mikkelsen’s performance in creating the relationship between Tonny and his dad. As when he comes in Mikkelsen brings a combination between a certain shyness, shame but also an eagerness. Mikkelsen shows Tonny wanting to connect with his father, but you also see the weight of a lack of connection. Something that becomes very clear as his father almost immediately begins to disregard Tonny and only halfheartedly takes on his own son as one of his men to commit crimes. Mikkelsen is fantastic in the way he so easily brings us into the headspace of Tonny in these interactions. Mikkelsen brings so much internalized pain in just every glance of hoping for any kind of approval, the eagerness to try to speak towards him with warmth, but a downturned brow that repeatedly emphasizes a man who has learned only to be a disappointment. Mikkelsen shows us the landscape of the man just eking out not just a living but really the life of a son as his dad allows him to be near him, however even that the dad treats as an inconvenience barely even a duty.
As the film progresses we see Tonny work the menial jobs, within the criminal organization, which include a robbery where in the getaway Tonny doesn't even get a seat in the car, just the trunk. Mikkelsen in these moments brings such a sadness to it that really amplifies because as much as we see the little smiles outwardly towards his dad these are between the quiet frustrations. Mikkelsen makes it much more heartbreaking because you see that Tonny does understand what is going on yet so much wants to hold onto any idea that his father will be a good man throughout these moments. Mikkelsen’s eyes showing someone looking for those moments only to have them dashed again and again, where Mikkelsen brings such power in showing the glint of hope fading as frustrations mount. Something that is exacerbated as his father not only continues to mistreat Tonny, he also shows constant favor towards Tonny’s younger half brother, as essentially the son that he always wanted in comparison to the obligation of Tonny.
Speaking of father and sons, the most poignant element of the film is as Tonny is confronted by his old girlfriend that he has a son of his own. Although her presentation of this is with as little warmth as possible as she is very direct in just wanting the child support from him. Mikkelsen is great in portraying the initial reaction as surprise with maybe a small bit of frustration however within it you can see a quiet urge towards someone finding more within looking at his son. Something that expands in each subsequent interaction where Mikkelsen with such modesty yet power reveals the best of Tonny as he spends time with his infant son. There’s a growing warmth in Mikkelsen but also his presence suddenly exudes a greater maturity and even satisfaction in these moments. You see a man who has any kind of real purpose that isn’t just trying to impress his father. Tonny however still lives in a toxic world, which includes his son’s mother who also is a drug addict and at times reveals herself to be as careless as anyone else. The later scenes of the film become the natural revelation to what Mikkelsen has expressed within his work for the rest of the film. His journey with his father leads only his father to make a truly wretched request for Tonny to murder a woman. Tonny initially agrees to which Mikkelsen presents as the most desperate last ditch effort to please his dad, even though in his eyes undercutting any notion that he can go through it. Something we see reflected when he goes to the woman and Mikkelsen’s terrific in playing the immediate anxiety within himself that leads him to egress from the scene leading to a confrontation with his father. A scene where Mikkelsen delivers the rage of Tonny so convincingly of not just the moment of rejecting the heinous act but the years of being put down as a lesser son. We see the same in regards to his son with two different acts. The first being Tonny doing what he knows, and Mikkelsen effectively plays it with the raw visceral energy of a man in a violent world when he lashes out at his son’s mother for doing drugs instead of minding their son. His reaction is the same violence he knows with Mikkelsen emphasizing that lack of thought. His final act though is different, although the good intention is there for both in caring for his son, the second it isn’t violence just taking his son out of the environment. A silence sequence where the emotion is potent just in Mikkelsen’s reactions throughout shows Lonny not only being a father, showing warmth and care, but also in his eyes there is also being a man without violence quietly embracing the potential for something better. What can one say but yes Mads Mikkelsen is terrific once again. Finding all the nuance in the role and naturalizing realizing the humanity of the violent “thug”.
75 comments:
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.
1. Considine
2. Pacino
3. Mikkelsen
4. Bale
5. Bernal
1. Yagira
2. Leung
3. Murray
4. SRK
5. I. Khan
Louis: I found myself intrigued. What are your top ten favorite performances of all time, across every medium and category for both men and women?
As for small personal annoucements I have joined Letterboxd a few days ago, link is on my profile page here. And hey, it involves a name reveal as well!
Ytrewq: Followed.
Tahmeed: Happy birthday, man.
Ytrewq Wertyq: I never thought I'd see anyone give Fellowship less than 4 stars.
Tahmeed: Happy Birthday!
Tahmeed: Happy Birthday.
Luke: I should clarify that around 50 of these movies I have rated on another website like a decade ago back when I wasn't into films much and I didn't really know how to assess them, but now that years have passed I'm planning to give LOTR a rewatch at some point.
Tahmeed: Happy birthday!
Happy Birthday, Tahmeed!
Regarding Anemone, Three different elements make up this debut by Ronan Day-Lewis. Stylistic shots that have little meaning, sometimes result in a cool but perfunctory shot since they aren’t properly attached to the story. Two wholly dull scenes of a son character who was better left off screen despite having the talents of Samantha Morton to try to help these scenes along, but they just add up to absolutely nothing. Then there is basically the elder Day-Lewis’s one man show, despite Sean Bean being there. Because as much as the situation seems primed for two men to go at it with differing world views, which would’ve been something, Bean’s character is so severely underwritten, he mostly just listens as Day-Lewis monologues as one would in a one man show. Which hey that’s where the film does work to an extent as you have arguably the greatest living actor doing the one man show. Honestly though this film is best watched at home, and just skip to whenever DDL is doing his acting showcase.
Bean - 3.5
Morton - 3.5
Bottomley - 2
Oakley-Green - 2.5
Happy Birthday Tahmeed
I gather from your thoughts, that if he does get a five, he'll more than likely not make the top five in the Lead overall.
Thank you for the lovely birthday wishes everyone.
Thoughts on the Anemone cast? And is Bean Lead or Supporting?
Louis: I'd like to take the request I won from Supporting Actor '24 and use it on Jack Benny in TBONTB.
Tahmeed: Happy birthday,
Harris:
Bean - (He's the most supporting a lead's ever been. As in terms of the setup and screentime he's lead, but MAN is he so underdeveloped. The annoying thing is the little crumbs of character we get are intriguing, Bean is more than game in bringing this conviction yet calm manner of the responsible brother, but sadly he only really gets lines to setup and facilitate Day-Lewis, when there was room for a real two-hander conflict where the men truly challenge each other. Bean has the presence to do it, and gives us the appropriate striking strength within himself but sadly the film just isn't interested in him.)
Morton - (She's game to bring the emotional exhaustion of a strained mother looking for help and to get her son out of his troubles. But her lines are repetitive and sadly it just doesn't go anywhere.)
Bottomley - (Not as a bad as the son in the son, but similar which is bad enough. Just brings a disinterested one note and gives us no real sense of who he is beyond the note or any real sense of history with his life)
Oakley-Green - (Not bad in a truly pointless role.)
I enjoyed The Smashing Machine in its idiosyncrasy that is neither the Wrestler nor Warrior, despite theoretically dealing with elements from both. It also is neither Uncut Gems nor Good Time, closer to Heaven Knows What in being a fly on the wall on an atypical existence. Which includes some dramatic moments, but a lot of just moments of naturalistic interactions. Something I found actually worked in its curious way, where a casual conversation before the match is treated as importantly as the match. Where a couple playfully argues about going on an amusement ride is as important as their toxic shouting matches. Having said that, a few of Safdie’s song choices are a little strange and the film doesn’t truly add up to something more in this approach. But it was easy enough to enjoy.
Blunt - 4.5
Bader - 3.5(Falls into the rare example of an "obviously bad performance that works regardless".)
Rutten - 3.5
Thoughts on the cast?
Louis: Your category placement for Blunt.
Louis: Your opinion on these hypothetical casts?
1990s The Pawnbroker directed by Paul Thomas Anderson
Sol Nazerman: Albert Brooks
Marilyn Birchfield: Susan Sarandon
Rodriguez: Ving Rhames
Jesus Ortiz: John Leguizamo
2020s The Pawnbroker directed by Brady Corbet
Sol Nazerman: Paul Giamatti
Marilyn Birchfield: Jodie Foster
Rodriguez: Laurence Fishburne (here I envisioned him as more of an experienced kingpin and Sol's age-mate rather than young, ambitious criminal from the original)
Jesus Ortiz: David Alvarez
2000s Thunderbolt and Lightfoot directed by George Armitage
John "Thunderbolt" Doherty: Russell Crowe
"Lightfoot": Ryan Reynolds
"Red" Leary: Ron Perlman
Eddie Goody: Steve Buscemi
1. Considine
2. Pacino
3. Mikkelsen
4. Bale
5. Bernal
1. Yagira
2. Murray
3. Leung
4. SRK
5. I. Khan
Hey guys!
Tell us your ranks of 2004 nominees in each category:
Song
1. "Al Otro Lado Del Río" - The Motorcycle Diaries
2. "Accidentally in Love" - Shrek 2
3. "Believe" - The Polar Express
4. "Look to Your Path" - The Chorus
5. "Learn to Be Lonely" - The Phantom of the Opera
Original Score
1. The Village
2. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
3. Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
4. The Passion of the Christ
5. Finding Neverland
Sound Mixing
1. Spider-Man 2
2. The Incredibles
3. The Polar Express
4. The Aviator
5. Ray
Sound Editing
1. Spider-Man 2
2. The Incredibles
3. The Polar Express
Editing
1. Collateral
2. Million Dollar Baby
3. The Aviator
4. Finding Neverland
5. Ray
Visual Effects
1. Spider-Man 2
2. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
3. I, Robot
Makeup and Hairstyling
1. Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
2. The Passion of the Christ
3. The Sea Inside
Costume
1. Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
2. The Aviator
3. Troy
4. Ray
5. Finding Neverland
Production Design
1. A Very Long Engagement
2. Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
3. The Aviator
4. The Phantom of the Opera
5. Finding Neverland
Cinematography
1. A Very Long Engagement
2. House of Flying Daggers
3. The Passion of the Christ
4. The Aviator
5. The Phantom of the Opera
International Feature Film
1. Downfall (Germany)
2. Yesterday (South Africa)
3. The Sea Inside (Spain)
4. The Chorus (France)
5. As It Is in Heaven (Sweden)
Animated Feature Film
1. The Incredibles
2. Shrek 2
3. Shark Tale
Adapted Screenplay
1. Before Sunset
2. Million Dollar Baby
3. Sideways
4. The Motorcycle Diaries
5. Finding Neverland
Original Screenplay
1. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
2. Vera Drake
3. The Incredibles
4. Hotel Rwanda
5. The Aviator
Supporting Actress
1. Virginia Madsen
2. Sophie Okonedo
3. Laura Linney
4. Cate Blanchett
5. Natalie Portman
Supporting Actor
1. Thomas Haden Church
2. Clive Owen
3. Morgan Freeman
4. Alan Alda
5. Jamie Foxx
Lead Actress
1. Imelda Staunton
2. Kate Winslet
3. Catalina Sandino Moreno
4. Hilary Swank
5. Annette Bening
Lead Actor
1. Leonardo DiCaprio
2. Don Cheadle
3. Clint Eastwood
4. Johnny Depp
5. Jamie Foxx
Director
1. Mike Leigh
2. Clint Eastwood
3. Alexander Payne
4. Martin Scorsese
5. Taylor Hackford
Picture
1. Million Dollar Baby
2. Sideways
3. The Aviator
4. Finding Neverland
5. Ray
Luke:
Sylvester - 3.5(Plays his horribleness with an ease about it where there’s not even a second thought it is just his whole natural instinct to be terrible. He doesn’t bring any pride or even joy about it, just a cruel disregard for any typical decency.)
Sorensen - 3.5(Also horrible but in a different way because she plays the note of sorta caring seemingly but seems more content in her ambivalence towards life in general including giving too much time to her own child beyond using it for material wealth.)
Hagen-Traberg - 3(He’s fine but I didn’t find he really stood out in any particular way.)
Nielsen - 3.5(Fits the name of his character where he just emphasizes the, for the lack of a better word, greasy disgusting nature of the character who goes along in just the most insincere and sleazy way. Where like the others there’s no thought of decent as their world is defined by the same disregard.)
Perfectionist:
I’d rather not create such a list at this time.
Harris:
Blunt - (Very much not what the trailer is selling where it seems like she’s going to be doing some variation on Amy Adams in The Fighter. That is not the case, though she’s theoretically working within the “status” type, something I found Blunt excelled with. As it is very easy to come off as “slumming it” but Blunt finds honesty with every moment of her work. Hitting just the right thickness with it to be too much in the right way but not become a caricature. Her setup works but she expands beyond that in creating the extreme emotional states of her character. Playing through her emotional vulnerability that combines with some joyous moments, but also her moments of being this grating desperation of someone purposefully choosing to push the buttons. Blunt makes these shifts feel wholly natural and convincingly creates the constant swings from the “trophy wife” to one half of a toxic relationship.)
Bader - (Again everything he does one would describe usually as bad acting, from his extremely simplistic line deliveries to reactions, but for whatever reason this approach makes him the right kind of calming and caring figure every time he pops up.)
Rutten - (Pretty good as himself, and it goes beyond just being a natural character, which he is, but he is more than that. Bringing some real nuance in his reactions to show the greater depth of the trainer who does care about his fighter beyond the win.)
Luke:
100% supporting.
Ytrewq:
Pawnbroker 90’s great fit particularly for Brooks, and Rhames, definitely would need Leguizamo to be directed well but PTA would be one to do it.
20’s
Giamatti’s a natural fit, as are Foster and Fishburne and Alvarez.
Armitage is an interesting choice that could work. Reynolds is ideal for Lightfoot, as is Crowe for Thunderbolt. Perlman and Buscemi would make for a great duo.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Zlatko Burić in the first Pusher film?
Louis: Your thoughts on these following Succession scenes?
Logan "negotiates" with Greg
Roman and Kendall argue with Matsson
Choosing to call the election
Louis, have you read Vineland or any of Pynchon's other works? If so, which specific works of his have you read?
Shaggy:
Animated Feature:
3) Shark Tale (WTF Academy?)
2) Shrek 2
1) The Incredibles
Visual Effects:
3) I, Robot
2) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
1) Spider-Man 2
Sound Editing:
3) The Polar Express
2) Spider-Man 2
1) The Incredibles
Sound Mixing:
5) Ray
4) The Aviator
3) The Polar Express
2) The Incredibles
1) Spider-Man 2
Make-Up:
2) A Series of Unfortunate Events
1) The Passion of the Christ
Costumes:
5) Ray
4) Finding Neverland
3) Troy
2) A Series of Unfortunate Events
1) The Aviator
Production Design:
4) Finding Neverland
3) A Very Long Engagement
2) The Aviator
1) A Series of Unfortunate Events
Song:
2) "Believe"
1) "Accidentally in Love"
Score:
5) Finding Neverland
4) A Series of Unfortunate Events
3) The Village
2) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
1) The Passion of the Christ
Editing:
5) Ray
4) Finding Neverland
3) Million Dollar Baby
2) The Aviator
1) Collateral
Cinematography:
4) House of Flying Daggers
3) The Aviator
2) A Very Long Engagement
1) The Passion of the Christ
Adapted Screenplay:
4) Finding Neverland
3) Million Dollar Baby
2) Sideways
1) Before Sunset
Original Screenplay:
4) The Aviator
3) Hotel Rwanda
2) The Incredibles
1) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Supporting Actress:
4) Natalie Portman
3) Cate Blanchett
2) Sophie Okonedo
1) Virginia Madsen
Supporting Actor:
5) Jamie Foxx
4) Alan Alda
3) Morgan Freeman
2) Clive Owen
1) Thomas Haden Church
Lead Actress:
2) Hilary Swank
1) Kate Winslet
(Thought occurs to me I'm not well watched in lead actress ...)
Lead Actor:
5) Jamie Foxx
4) Johnny Depp
3) Leonardo DiCaprio
2) Don Cheadle
1) Clint Eastwood
Director:
4) Taylor Hackford
3) Alexander Payne
2) Clint Eastwood
1) Martin Scorsese
Picture:
5) Ray
4) Sideways
3) Finding Neverland
2) Million Dollar Baby
1) The Aviator
Mescal will be campaigned in Supporting for Hamnet. Very early days, but interesting to have three strong contenders in him, Penn, and Skarsgård so far.
Tahmeed: Definitely think it was the right call.
Louis: Your thoughts on this voice for Catwoman. It's done by Elizabeth Gillies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFogd0oIEpU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVftEagCBF8
8000S: She sounds a lot like Laura Bailey when she played Lust on Fullmetal Alchemist. Which was always my headcanon voice for Selina in the comics, so that's a compliment. (Also, I saw ads for months on Facebook of Gillies playing Audrey in the on-going Little Shop of Horrors production, wonder how she was)
Luke: At this stage, who do you think will be Louis's choices for Actor and Actress.
Anonymous: Timothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme and Jessie Buckley in Hamnet.
If he's actually co-lead and not supporting, Elordi sounds like a performance up Louis's alley for a win. The second trailer sold me on the performance.
Robert: Will he like the film enough is the big question because usually strength of film matters alot when it comes to Lead winners.
I'm predicting Moura/Buckley at the moment.
Luke: I mean, he's given wins to films he's meh on before.
Robert: Not recent history though.
Tahmeed: I think Chalamet and Moura will be the top two this year.
I wouldn't count out Hyung-Lee Byung reuniting with Chan-wook Park just yet, fwiw.
I do agree with everyone's bets on Buckley, though.
Emi: I'm rather hesitant on betting on Lee because only 1 South Korean performance has ever won Lead Actor and that was Choi in I Saw The Devil.
Emi: His name is Lee Byung-hun.
I wouldn't underestimate DiCaprio, guys.
I have a friend who's been to a few festivals, and he even saw Marty Supreme. I asked him who are the best male and female lead of 2025 and he said Moura and Reinsve.
Matt: I'd be all for that, love every second of his work. It's been a while since we've had a more comedic lead actor win so that would be awesome.
On an OBAA related note, Infiniti will be campaigned in Lead. I could go either way on her placement, but given the third act and how instrumental she is, I get it.
Taylor's case remains vexing to me as she's lead in her screen time, and her influence is felt throughout.
Tried to go with his name first and forgot how to spell it entirely, lol. My bad.
Luke: True, but he's come real close to take the win in the bonus rounds twice now, and one of those was with Joint Security Area.
Tahmeed: While I guess she could be argued as lead in a Hopkins in The Silence of The Lambs way, I'd be surprised if she has more than 30/35 minutes of screen time total.
Luke: I have no idea what that’s supposed to mean, Louis has had plenty of Korean actors in second/third place on his rankings especially Lee, who is his favourite actor point blank; not odd to think Lee could take the overall, so not sure what you mean with that statement.
^that was me, once again getting Anoymous'ed. I'm predicting DiCaprio/Buckley/Penn/Lilleaas to be his winners, though I would love to see Lee or especially Moura take it; they'll be hard to usurp as my top 2.
Also, love seeing Infiniti campaign in lead, especially since she could get away with Supporting and it wouldn't even be fraud; but this shows great confidence in her. May we be gone with the years of campaigning people in Supporting for no reason other than 'they're young'.
Also, Louis, if you get the chance I highly recommend you check out Urchin. Harris Dickinson is a phenomenal director and I could see you vibing very much with Frank Dillane's performance.
Calvin: your ratings for the casts of Steve, Twinless, Urchin, and A Big Bold Beautiful Journey?
PS: I wish that Dylan O’Brien was getting more awards recognition. His performance in Twinless is my current runner-up for Lead Actor behind DiCaprio.
Steve
Murphy - 4.5
Ullman - 3.5
Lycurgo - 3.5
Ajikawo - 3.5
Watson - 3.5
Twinless
O'Brien -4.5
Sweeney - 4
Franciosi - 4
Urchin
Dillane - 5
Northam - 4
Khymchuk - 3.5
Marie - 3.5
Waked - 3.5
Dickinson - 3.5
A Big Bold Beautiful Journey
Farrell - 2
Robbie - 2.5
Kline - 2
Waller-Bridge - 2
Magnussen - 2
Gadon - 2.5
So these are my current acting predictions:
Actor: DiCaprio/Chalamet/Moura/White/Jordan Alt: Hawke
Actress: Buckley/Reinsve/Erivo/Stone/Byrne Alt: Infiniti (she was just confirmed to go lead)
Supporting Actor: Skarsgard/Penn/Mescal/Del Toro/Elordi (NGNG pick) Alt: Sandler
Supporting Actress: Madigan/Grande/Taylor/Lilleaas/Hall Alt: Fanning
Let's check back in two months to see how I'm doing post-GG/Sag noms.
Robert: I can see Infiniti getting in over Byrne. She's borderline supporting, sure, but OBAA will be more widely-seen by AMPAS members than If I Had Legs.
I actually do consider Infiniti lead, and I’m confused by the pushback. The entire last third of the movie is from her perspective and the ending thesis os essentially “it’s her turn now”.
Calvin: Could it happen, perhaps, but I need Louis to really love that film to be willing to predict him.
That’s not the point. It’s the rationale that a performance being in Korean would be less likely to win the overall which is odd with no basis.
Calvin: We'll speak again in February about it. If he wins, I'll gladly say I was wrong.
Lou, your thoughts and ratings on the cast of The Lost Bus?
Robert: Then can I ask why you're stopping short of predicting her at the moment? I feel what you've just pointed out will boost her chances of a nomination, if anything.
Tony: I’m already predicting 5 performances from the film getting nominated. If I predict 6, that breaks the record.
My current predictions are:
Buckley (winner)/Reinsve/Infiniti/Erivo/Byrne
DiCaprio (winner)/Chalamet/Jordan/Moura (critics will *have* to rally behind him though)/Plemons
Taylor (winner)/Lilleaas/Fanning/Grande/Madigan (though I am increasingly being sold on Hall)
Skarsgard (winner)/Mescal/Penn/Lindo/del Toro (and again you could sell me on any one of Elordi, Song, or Sandler though I'm certainly hoping no for the latter)
And for director I have PTA (winner)/Coogler/Zhao/Trier/Bigelow, though you could sell me on Mendonça, Park, Panahi, Josh Safdie, or even del Toro.
Louis: I understand, man. I do realize that that's condensing way too much... I personally do have such a top 10, but my limited exposure to Hollywood and Western cinemas relative to yours, also factors in that.
Louis: Your top 5 to 10 British/Irish actors that have emerged in the last 10 years.
Robert: If your aim is to predict only 5 acting nominees, what would make Infiniti a riskier prospect than Hall? As you yourself point out, the former has a far more narratively dominant role. Besides, if you look at the Lead Actress field, she's in what's likely the BP frontrunner, and her competition for a nomination are from films that will simply be much less acclaimed/seen (Stone, Seyfried, Byrne).
I hope Hall gets nominated, she gave my favourite performance out of the whole cast. But her role in the overall film - compared to her co-stars - is somewhat limited. I haven't made up my mind on who to predict for the S. Actress lineup right now, but to predict OBAA getting 5 acting nominations and not have Infiniti being among them doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
Calvin Law: Did you give your reason why you disliked Sandler?
Anonymous: Read his letterboxd review.
Hamnet looks magnificent, even more excited than I already was.
Post a Comment