Toshiro Mifune did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Isaburo Sasahara in Samurai Rebellion.
Samurai Rebellion tells the story of a highly skilled but unambitious samurai who runs afoul his clan after his son is asked to take the former concubine of their lord.
Samurai Rebellion suffers slightly in comparison to the great Masaki Kobayashi’s previous films about a man against a system of injustice, particularly Harakiri which it closely resembles in the overall plot and the idea of a family being torn about by cruel lords. It isn’t as great as that film, but Harakiri is one of the greatest films ever so being less than that isn’t bad. As it is still well worth watching, even if it isn’t as tight or quite as powerful as that film, in large part we get a very special collaboration by having the great Mifune as Kobayashi’s lead this time around and proof that neither his career, nor his talent ended after this legendary collaboration with Kurosawa. And Kobayashi thankfully challenges Mifune in a different role, despite being yet another samurai, this is a different samurai for Mifune. As this character is neither the great rebel samurai of Yojimbo nor is he a chaotic fake samurai from Seven Samurai, nor the great general from Hidden Fortress, Isaburo Sasahara is kind of just a guy even though he’s in this system. There’s a different vibe Mifune brings here that is just wonderful and shows once again great acting isn’t always playing extremely different parts rather it is finding the differences in similar parts and expressing those differences to make new characters that leave lasting impressions.
Mifune does so here by in no way making Sasahara any sort of larger than life guy in fact accentuating more so the fact that there isn’t anything too notable about him despite his alluded to skills at fighting something we get the sense of as he has casual conversations with his also extremely skilled friend and fellow vassal Tatewaki Asano (Tatsuya Nakadai). Nakadai and Mifune have great chemistry here that is unique to this film given, while there will be a duel between them, this is the only film I’ve seen between them where the pair get to be friends. With Mifune and Nakadai having just work buddy chemistry. It is very easy going with Mifune’s delivery of taking his life as casually as he does, even if in a defeated way at times given he is brow beaten by his wife, isn’t of someone bemoaning his whole existence rather it is just a guy who has accepted his plight having the bit of fun he does get in getting to to express that belief with his friend. The two have a great ease where the sense of respect between the men is just a given and the way Asano describes Sasahara, you see the younger man see the older man for more than what the older man even believes. As whenever Asano builds him up too much, Mifune plays in his eyes almost an embarrassment at the idea that he could be anything truly great and not just a husband and a dad.
Speaking of those two elements we get two very distinct sides from Mifune, and again sides that are unique to this performance from the great actor. The first is that of the husband where the moments we do get of him with his domineering wife, Mifune is remarkable in the years of just accepting whatever his wife says as his eyes have a resignation and his voice has an innate sigh of a man who seems to be constantly saying to himself “it’s just not worth fighting with her”. We also get the latter part as the dad where Mifune certainly played paternalistic father figures in previous films, notably Red Beard as one of his most mature characters, but this is very different as emphasis on the dad dad so to speak. As Mifune is wonderful at being a bit of a fuddyduddy for the lack of a better term. He’s not cool or hip around his son, rather you just get this simple bright smile of appreciation towards his son and just as someone who loves him simple as that. Mifune’s portrayal of not complicating this in any way is so distinct because complication is usually the name of the game, and even in Red Beard Mifune gave his wisdom out in sometimes cold blunt ways. But here Mifune just accentuates a sincere open warmth where every interaction with his son is just as a loving guy who wants nothing more than the best for his son. Mifune makes this pure in every bit we get and consistently expresses leaving a strong impression that is key to the progression of the plot.
The plot appears as Sasahara’s son is asked to take on the single mother concubine of the lord as his wife, something they reject based on rumors of her manner but something that changes when they find that she is a lovely loving woman. I’ll be honest while the relationship isn’t bad in any way I would say it is more of just fine and the film could’ve had something just a bit more potent in showing these two as the perfect couple sort of thing, instead they do what they need to, the actors I think just don’t have that burning chemistry though I think both are more than decent in their roles. Mifune picks up the slack for that however in his reactions to the love he sees between his son and his wife, as his smiles become so much brighter and his speech about the new wife, Mifune gives a glowing delivery of every word where he shows not how much Sasahara is getting out of the new women in a direct way but rather how much he’s getting out of her by seeing how much joy it brings to his son. When he encourages his son about the relationship, Mifune’s speech is tremendous because it contains love, but also the sense of years of burdened somehow relieved as Mifune’s eyes are that of a man who couldn’t have true love himself however that wound is softened by seeing his son find it in the end.
Sadly the plot becomes more complicated when the wife is recalled by the lord at a cruel moment, something the family eventually rejects as a cruelty, particularly after the couple had conceived a child. And when we see the son take the stand Mifune’s laying of the groundwork of the man defined by this love for his son pays off, when we see his son’s happiness threatened Mifune’s work shows this love fueling his conviction to do whatever it takes to defend his son. Mifune’s calm in these scenes shows essentially the great man who always could’ve been in the way we see a man standing firm by his strongest belief that being the belief in supporting his son. Even surprising his son in his steadfast approach Mifune is great in suddenly his presence being the full Mifune of the man who is larger than life, but still different as we see that put upon dad now finding his strength as in every moment of this there is this glint in the eye of Mifune of a man who is doing it all for tender care. Eventually it all falls apart when the Lord refuses to relent leading to both the tragic death of Sasahara’s son and his daughter in law. Then we get Mifune unleashed in one of his all time great just full Mifune intensity here representing not just rage but also such rabid grief as Sasahara kills a substantial number of men from the Lord. Mifune uses all of his physical power and every bit of what his eyes can do like few actors to show the tremendous pain of a father fueled into every moment of the one sided massacre. That moment is followed by such a poignant moment of performance by Mifune as he shifts to such a gentle heartbreaking calm as he buries his family, where Mifune’s quiet in contrast to the earlier explosion is so powerful in showing the same love now just in his promise to try to spread the word of the injustice by escaping the lord’s realm. Leading Sasahara to have to duel Asano as the latter must fulfill his duty as the guard of the border, where Mifune finds such a remarkable quality as he prepares to fight his friend. There is just this quiet calm conviction as he notes what he will do no matter what, you see a man with his eyes set on only doing the justice and promise to his family. It isn’t the eyes of a killer but the eyes of a father that Mifune expresses in this quest. Throughout the incredible duel Mifune’s performance is captivating in the consistency of that conviction until he fatally wounds his best friend. When Asano stops, I love the shift of Mifune as we see that conviction vanish, not because he no longer cares, but now sees his friend as no longer an enemy but just his dying friend. Mifune is so moving by making this shift feel natural as Sasahara still loved his friend even though he had to kill him for his quest. Something we see continue in a final attempt to escape where Mifune again brings such intensity to every moment of the final fight, being this fierce powerful onslaught of that emotional power of a man putting every ounce into himself to try to find justice for his family. Mifune is incredible as he conveys that even as he is physically falling apart from wounds, the eyes never waver as the man is looking to that conviction still. Mifune delivers yet another tremendous performance here, finding a new way to the rebel samurai, this time not as a man who rebels through chaos, but rather just a reflection of love for a father.
135 comments:
Louis: Could you watch Marketa Lazarova, Will Penny, The Young Girls Of Rochefort, Chiriyakhana, The Nun, A Bullet For The General, Custer Of The West, Our Mother's House, Elvira Madigan and re-watches of Wait Until Dark, Far From The Madding Crowd, To Sir, With Love and Cool Hand Luke (If Poitier and Newman could possibly get upgraded) before you finish 1967).
This review feels like the end of an era. Will never see another from the Sensei again.
Louis: Is this Mifune's greatest non-Kurosawa performance for you.
Your thoughts on the top 8 of your Season 4 cast ranking of The Bear, and thoughts on the episodes 'Bears' and 'Goodbye.'
Louis: Your thoughts on the production design of Equinox Flower, Late Autumn and The End of Summer.
Louis: What were your thoughts on Tom Hardy in Mobland?
Looks like we're not seeing Mifune's record being broken any time soon... not like we were going to before, but less so now, lol.
I'd be thrilled if you give the win to Poitier, or a boost in the ranking. And of course, upgrades for Newman, and possibly Hoffman.
As far as Mr Toshiro Mifune is concerned, his acting truly was unparalleled with an unreal catalogue. Seems to me his greatness wasn't cherished enough in his time. This blog has done a great job, in bringing attention to so many of Mifune's and Japan's great works.
Perfectionist: I don't think Hoffman will happen because I think he would've seen The Graduate 4 or 5 times already.
Louis: Could you check out The Incident. Has a 3.9 rating on Letterboxd and Martin Sheen has a leading role in his film debut.
I think a 4.5 is right for Hoffman, but in an ideal world I’d love to see The Graduate’s rating as a film upgraded.
Also I’ve actually seen The Incident, Martin Sheen is VERY good in the first half, unfortunately he takes a backseat in the second half when the film randomly decides Tony Musante is the main character, which is a shame because he takes a much more generic psychopath approach to his role.
Louis: Your thoughts on Cavill, Crowe and Bautista as castings for Stahelski's Highlander film.
Louis: Your top 5 best portrayals of real life serial killers?
4.5 is just right for Hoffman. I'd probably give Bancroft a 5 though.
Has anyone besides me and Calvin seen Weapons yet? It's...something. Still chewing it on a couple of days later.
^That was me.
Bryan: your ratings for the cast (if you do any)?
PS: I’m about to start watching it right now.
Anonymous (not me): Hhmmm I'll go...
Brolin - 4 (Could go up a bit)
Garner - 4
Ehrenreich - 3.5/4
Abrams - 3.5
Christopher - 3
Wong - 3.5
Madigan - 3.5/4
Huss - 3
Long - In it
It is indeed structured like Magnolia, though it's much more of a genre piece compared to the acting showcase of the former.
Tahmeed:
Yes, though Rickshaw Man is close.
8000’s:
I would ask you to refer to my previous thoughts on a then modern set Ozu production design, as I love it but it is even more consistent than Wes Anderson in terms of the nature of the design.
Harris:
Hardy’s best in quite a while, though that is only saying all that much when you consider his fleeting appearances in Alfie Soloman. But Hardy is great here in one of his lowest key turns as the calmest of fixers. Hardy really reigns it in beautifully because as quiet as he is here, the emotions he is working with are all there. We just see Hardy containing them within his portrayal of someone who uses violence as a tool and is in a strange world of entrapment though with privileges but attempts to operate as professionally as he can in his strange situation. Hardy carries that weight so effectively where the minor breaks in his state, Hardy shows it as deep within the “face” of the man which is just the professional. Then of course you have all the professional scenes where Hardy just commands the space like few actors can, where his presence is fully there and there is just a penetrating power to his particular and assertive calm. Hardy always accentuates the man with it all together and makes every one of his “fixing” scenes so dynamic and convincing that one man could do what he does with such remarkable ease.
Luke:
All strong choices for what I assume are MacCleod, Ramirez and Kurgan equivalents. And Stahelski is a great choice to direct, as one thing the film needs is great swordfights which I assume we will get.
Ytrewq:
1. Richard Attenborough - 10 Rillington Place
2. Charlize Theron - Monster
3. Robert Blake - In Cold Blood
4. Michael Rooker - Henry Portrait of a Serial Killer
5. Tony Curtis - The Boston Strangler
Only included those literally named the person hence no Mitchum for Hunter or Perkins for Psycho.
Anonymous:
Cho - (I’ve often found him a *there* actor but I really thought he came to life in this one as an opponent for Charlie in a different way. Playing effectively the obvious conman playing the part essentially of the conman with the sense of the man actively working his ways but only when he’s *on*. Contrasting against that so well in his scenes of playing it straight with Charlie where I really loved the blunt directness of Cho’s delivery of a guy who also overcomes the lying power in a way, not through technique but rather just a lack of concern for the lie as something innate in his blood. Cho has a wonderful ease about his work and just that conman, for the lack of a better word “cool” at times but then also subverts it with this casual manner where he’s just talking to Charlie as a fellow professional. I loved everything about what he did, bringing an alternative take consistently by being the man who is amoral in a different way rather wonderfully.)
Method Man - (Thought he was hilarious as one of the more sympathetic killers, by bringing just such a silly sincerity in every moment of his performance. Playing this eagerness where you do feel sorry for the guy to a certain degree because his attitude towards his gym is just so pure and Method Man’s way of accentuating that genuineness so consistently. Even when it takes the turns, I loved the rather childish approach in his performance of the man even crying moments when becoming more so the villain, I thought he hilariously played the manchild angle beautifully by being so sincerely consistent in his silly but honest stance as the guy reacting to the destruction of his gym like the destruction of a little boy’s dream.)
Martindale - (Also hilarious by starting out with just seeming to be the dismissive headmistress type, then totally subverting that in the way she ends up playing with such strict seriousness the absolutely silly situation of her blackmail situation. Martindale makes every line that is over the top sing, but plays it so much as though she was being blackmailed by some dominant fiend…rather a very evil and creepy little girl.)
Richardson - (Another more sympathetic side to the character, while successfully playing the moment of a desperate insecurity in his wants regarding his specific dream, but brings the right earnestness to the scenes of reacting to what happens because of his criminal choices. Bringing the right shades of a moving regret in certain moments underneath the surface even if it isn’t quite enough for his character to do the right thing.)
Theroux - (Bonus points for the proper Peter Falk impression but otherwise very strong silent acting from him more than anything. As in every sort of instance, where he’s the villain protagonist in a bit of a different way than the other killers so we’re brought into his thoughts mostly through reactions. Theroux runs with this exceptionally well though in playing the moments of more evil calculation but also scenes of concern and possible frustration pent into himself to try to figure out what to do in a given situation.)
Grier - (Just thought his one note was hilarious that being essentially the psychotically vicious apartment manager, and just playing without hesitation his character’s ire towards all his tenets. I especially loved his completely straightfaced delivery of killing someone over having tried to cheat him out of rent in some way.)
Esposito - (An enjoyable alternative because I’m glad he didn’t just do Gus, rather he did find a variation in kind of the early 90’s Esposito mixed together with his menacing side as we get a different combo as he’s a little silly and pathetic in his way that Esposito embraces with a certain messiness and accentuates that rather than any sort of cunning.)
Harrison - (Well spoiler alert, I thought Harrison’s performance worked well as the sidekick, though I predicted the eventual outcome of the character, in bringing at first this sort of spunky energy fitting for Charlie’s seemingly ideal number 2. And finding dynamic moments in playing seemingly more genuine emotions with a good chemistry with Lyonne, though setting up the twist in the way the shift seems to accommodate whatever will work with Charlie. The second shift I thought Harrison was perfectly fine but didn’t blow me away I guess in terms of taking to some next level. I think fully delivers in bringing just a cold villain energy, but I think maybe there was room for something a bit more memorable though Harrison is more than fine.)
Louis: Where would Hardy's work rank overall in his career.
Louis: Your top 10 performances across all three seasons of Squid Game?
Louis: You don't need to go into specifics of course, but which films/performances do you think benefited tremendously (in terms of your perspective) by external circumstances?
I think the most obvious one for me was watching The Thin Red Line during a time of tremendous unrest in Bangladesh last year. I'd consider it a masterpiece regardless of timing, but Malick's commentary on the human condition, and the depictions of loss of life hit hard to the point that it immediately made my all time top 5.
Tahmeed: I watched Casablanca for the first time four days after Trump was elected in 2016.
Louis: Your overall thoughts on the S1s of Mobland and The Studio?
Agreed with everything in this review, he's fantastic and it's one of his best performances, period. No idea why I was seeing people ranking him in third or so for their initial predictions.
Louis: a 2010s version of this with Hiroyuki Sanada and Hidetsohi Nishijima in Mifune and Nakadai's roles?
Calvin: I go with wishful thinking on the odd occasion because at first glance I had enough reason to believe Bondarchuk and Simon could do really well despite Mifune sitting rather strongly at 5th in the overall prior to this.
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on Musante and Sheen in The Incident? I don’t imagine you have much to say about the rest of the cast since they’re all so perplexingly underutilized.
Out of curiosity, what are everyone's Best Actor choices for the 1970's?
Michael: He gives ratings and thoughts after the results.
Luke:
Probably just above Mad Max.
A:
1. Lee Jung-jae
2. O Yeong-su
3. Gong Yoo
4. Lee Byung-hun
5. Kang Ae-Shim
6. Kim Joo-ryoung
7. Ho Yeon Jung
8. Park Hae-soo
9. Park Sung-hoon
10. Jo Yu-ri
Tahmeed:
Watching the Hateful Eight the first time while a blizzard raged outside added GREATLY to the atmosphere.
Otherwise some more mediocre films I'll enjoy more if watching with certain company that loves it, as while it doesn't make me like the film more per se I get joy from their joy making watching the film a better experience.
Harris:
Mobland I quite enjoyed despite a few obvious flaws, those flaws being the writing of all the female characters except Helen Mirren's who really fall into different tropes, Mirren's technically does to, but she elevates it. The main plot though wholly works as one situation after another that Hardy's fixer needs to crack after another with the breakdown of the mob family having plenty of great tension that builds beautifully particularly in the second half.
The Studio I thought was easy enough to watch with fun with the novelty of the cameos and inside talk, but I always thought it could've simply been funnier throughout, as I simply didn't laugh all that much. And again Rogen I just don't like as a lead which maybe always held me back from embracing it more. I'll probably watch next season though as it was easy to get through.
Calvin:
That would be a great pair.
Michael:
I'll get more detailed later, but I'll just say mine are similar to yours.
Louis: If you don't want to comment again on The Bear reprises, could I just have your thoughts on Odenkirk, Deadwyler, Gibson, and Ramos this season?
Everyone, how comfortable are you with the current pop-up format of the comment section? I was thinking about asking Louis if he'd consider changing it to the embedded format, as it's easier and more convenient to access (i.e. you don't have to open a new window and scroll down to the bottom to comment).
Louis: Do you feel comfortable giving your thoughts on the Fantastic Four cast?
Tony: After 12 years, I'm more than accustomed to it by now and it doesn't really irritate me.
Just wanted to say in the topic of watching a movie under external circumstances, I watched Decision To Leave after being awake for 22 hours.
Idk if it added to or diminished the experience, but it was something...
I got another one: First time I watched Blue Velvet, I was high on painkillers I got from wisdom teeth removal.
I'll say that watching the F1 movie with my girlfriend who's very into the ins and outs of Formula 1 made me enjoy the movie a lot more than I probably would have otherwise.
Luke: I do feel it would make things more visually organized, at least. The Reply buttons would be accessed right under the post, so responses can be grouped together more easily.
Louis: Your thoughts on 'My Lullaby' from The Lion King II: Simba's Pride.
youtube.com/watch?v=yJGqxf86cZs&pp=ygUodGhlIGxpb24ga2luZyAyIHNpbWJhJ3MgcHJpZGUgbXkgbHVsbGFieQ%3D%3D
Rest In Peace Danielle Spencer.
RIP Danielle Spencer.
Tim here, i'm out of town for a couple weeks. Anyway, first time i saw The Blair Witch Project was on a VHS tape on a very old TV around mitnight in a house made of wood that would screech every 5 Minutes or so (by the way the only way to really experience that film)
Louis: Even though every performance involves effort, do you think actors like Cooper and DiCaprio's worst performances are when they try a bit too hard to stand out?
Matt: Oddly enough, my girlfriend is ALSO a big Formula 1 fan. We could've watched the movie a few weeks ago, but we decided to wait too stream it, and choose Superman instead.
Louis: Your presently unfindable thoughts on these original songs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkKxiREGDx4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP0zsWupANs
Weapons sure was something, have to say I haven't seen a film like it in some time. It kind of cheats in that while it does have a fascinating premise, instead of playing it straight it sidesteps into being purposefully ridiculous. I didn't love it by any means, but I had a good time.
Brolin - 4
Abrams - 4 (his constant running away got a lot of laughs out of me)
Garner - 3 (starts off a little stilted, but she improved as the film went on)
Ehrenreich - 3.5
Madigan - 4
Wong - 3.5
Christopher - 3
Huss - 3
Tim: Your thoughts on the Scrubs episode My Soul on Fire?
Louis: Thoughts on the Marty Supreme trailer.
Tahmeed: Agreed on the film. Might bump Abrams up a bit too.
Louis, thoughts on the trailer for “Steve”?
Tahmeed:
In terms of the reprises I'll just say each naturally advanced their characters with some standout moments, particularly the final argument between the three where all were truly great.
Odenkirk I thought stepped beyond kind of the cameo setup in creating this curious state of the man who is kind of an outsider but also knew the family closely than Carmy at that very point of comparison. Odenkirk I thought wonderfully combined a certain awkwardness of someone trying to connect but still struggling, with some genuine sense of empathy of someone trying his best to not seem out of place yet still say his piece. It was strong work that like say Curtis turned a cameo into a character.
Deadwyler I thought was a better cameo technically because she seemed just like a character rather than a celeb fan getting a walk on and she goes all into her performance with that in mind. I also enjoyed seeing her really on a different branch of her talents bringing her intensity but in this version a comedic role. And I will say I found that she delivered rather naturally in bringing this sort of force of personality who is just always a lot all at once, but in a way that always felt lived in and convincing.
Gibson I thought was hilarious every time we focused on him in just playing this particularly sort of random yet always believable angle of his character's humble ambition. His chemistry with Reiner was particularly great as they played off each other through really anti-chemistry in a great way, I especially loved their back and forth as Gibson so sincerely stealing from McDonalds and Reiner playing the straightman there of trying to change that urge.
Ramos I felt mostly for her chemistry with Moss-Bachrach which I thought was tremendous in their ease together. Something I also felt in season 2 but I thought they expanded so nicely here and in a way that just felt authentic by having the two get to play off each other in such an easy yet also deeply empathetic way.
Matt:
Pascal - (I was probably most trepidatious about his casting out of the main four because he just didn't wholly give off the Reed vibe in other roles. And I'll say in the early scenes I still wasn't quite sure through his way of playing up sort of the disconnected nature of the character in a fairly mannered way. I will say as the film progressed I felt the choice payed off rather nicely by Pascal using that early setup to then have moments of impact by breaking them in key moments whether that in his moments of being genuinely flustered by Galactus's presence, or his moments of revealing his genuine care for his family.)
Kirby - (Had the most faith in her and obviously it payed off. As she has such a strong screen presence to begin with and just felt ideal for Sue Storm with that innate power needed for such a character, something I'd say was distinctly lacking in the previous actresses in the role. Kirby brings on that front but also went further with me by playing so hard, in a good way, with the notes where she brings that mama grizzly bear energy, I especially loved her delivery of "kill her" being so raw and direct.)
Moss-Bachrach - (Liked what he did in bringing that "old neighborhood" energy but he just didn't get to play with too much in scenes that honestly just felt trimmed to an inch of their life.)
Quinn - (Thought he managed to bring sort of the fireball hyperactive nature of Johnny in a different way that totally worked for me. Showing rather than just being energetic all the time instead showing this specific sort of moments and devotion of energy to certain things as someone who goes all in when he goes in at all.)
Garner - (I don't know she just doesn't quite do it for me yet, I just didn't quite get much out of her performance here either thought she was okay but didn't come of as all that menacing nor did her empathetic moments really hit me hard.)
Lyonne - (Nice to see her shame her scenes were cut as I liked her chemistry with him from what we got.)
Hauser - (I feel his joke would've played better if we actually saw him in his early scenes that were clearly deleted, though I liked him just fine with what he had.)
Ineson - (Seemed to have been cast for the voice, which good choice in that sense.)
Jonathan:
Eh...there's worse straight to VHS sequel songs, but I didn't find this one very impressive. With the rather silly if not overcomplicated lyrics combined with a pseudo melody that just kind of goes up and down and nowhere. Let's just say it's no Be Prepared, despite having a sexy voice behind it.
Marcus:
Yes, at least in terms of the dramatic, as the two can try hard with comedy so to speak and going hard actually works for them then often enough. But with drama both are better if they play a bit more internalized with some externalizations. The problem is both I think want to be Day-Lewis where it is that full force embodiment, and while both are talented, they can quite pull of that and yes in turn that stand out in the wrong way like in Killers and Maestro.
Tony:
I'll say James Brown vocals always do a lot of work for a given song to begin with and this one already has a ton of character just from Brown. But I do like the song beyond that with its lyrics very much that feel 70's NY even if they are a bit random at times as is the instrumentation that goes from moments of just percussion to really light woodwinds, to then the fuller big band sound suddenly, slightly random but I find it works, and again Brown selling it helps a lot.
I mean really like that Guitar riff that keeps the song going just through the color that it brings as Jagger goes off on a rambling screed exactly that I'll admit I don't find the most compelling words he ever wrote.
Jonathan:
I kind of loved it to be honest with that surprise build up to "oh this about ping pong" and here's hoping the Safdie separation just leads to two great films. As I really liked this off-beat approach seemingly there with Chalamet certainly going for it, Paltrow perhaps showing her talents again and here's hoping O'Leary does as well as Safdie's previous non-actor performances.
J96:
I saw Murphy in a lead role and was sold. But the actual film looks like it could hit the potential maybe hit a teacher movie sweet spot (whether that be inspirational or Uncut Gems version hard to tell fully from this trailer), with likely the tough moments not holding back given Mielants's and Murphy's previous collaboration.
Out of curiosity, has anyone seen Ozark? It seems Garner's work is clearly loved in the industry, but also has some loud detractors.
So I actually loved Weapons more or less entirely. Though weirdly, I don't get why you're all singling out Abrams. Found him the weak link. Madigan is fucking amazing, though, and I loved what an absolute shithead Ehrenreich makes Paul.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Chase Sui Wonders in The Studio? And how would you rank the cast of Mobland?
Louis: So here's the thing. I watched 3:10 to Yuma (2007). Man, Crowe is an easy 5 for me there(he is my MVP of the movie)... It's among his top 3 performances for me, the more I think about it. So when 2007 comes down the line, would you consider reviewing him???
Hopefully, someone backs me here on Crowe, so I can use a request lol. I have won a few, but I have used only one I think(for Cumming).
Perfectionist: I saw the film a long time ago, but I loved Crowe's performance in it.
Perfectionist: He'll more than likely give it a re-watch during 07 because he admitted Crowe was lower in the ranking than he should be. If he isn't reviewed, then hold on to that request until that year is completed.
2007 is CROWDED enough as it is. Might be better off to wait until that round is over.
Bryan: Sure thing.
Your thoughts on these fictional titles for movies made by classic Japanese directors.
Akira Kurosawa's The Seven Deadly Sins
Yasujiro Ozu's Early Winter
Kenji Mizoguchi's A Geisha's Misfortunes
Mikio Naruse's Crimson Camelias
Kihachi Okamoto's The Killer Within Me
Masaki Kobayashi's The Massacres of 1923
Harris: while "Hey Yah" should positively never ever be played at a real Wedding, Sam Lloyd's rendition is without a doubt the best i have ever heard. And it perfectly plays over the really romantic final montage that proves just how impeccable the chemistry between the whole cast is. And all of that following the really original and rather moving ceremony (i always love it when the Janitor gets more depth).
Other than that, it just fun. All the relationship conflicts are understandable, we get the ultimate high five, the visuals are nice and a change of setting is always welcome in a hospital Show. I am rather perplexed that this isn't rated higher on IMDB ...
8000s: "Early Winter" sounds like it could've/would've been a companion piece to Late Spring.
Louis: What's your rating and thoughts on Cyril Cusack in The Spy Who Came in from the Cold?
8000S, you have premises worked out in your mind for any of those titles?
Louis: Your casts and directors for 1990s and 2020s versions of Seven Days in May?
Louis: What are the top 10 most disturbing film scenes you've ever seen?
RIP Terence Stamp
RIP Terence Stamp
RIP Terence Stamp.
RIP Terence Stamp
Aw Man! Rest In Peace Terrence Stamp.
2 Superman Actors gone this year.
RIP Terence Stamp
RIP Terence Stamp
RIP Terence Stamp
RIP the great Terence Stamp
R.I.P. Terence Stamp
RIP Terence Stamp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8_mv1na3IM
RIP Terence Stamp.
8000’s:
Akira Kurosawa's The Seven Deadly Sins - (An anthology)
Yasujiro Ozu's Early Winter - (Maybe about a funeral at some point.)
Kenji Mizoguchi's A Geisha's Misfortunes - Sounds like the life of Oharu.
Mikio Naruse's Crimson Camelias - About a woman doing something.
Kihachi Okamoto's The Killer Within Me - Killer Nakadai again.
Masaki Kobayashi's The Massacres of 1923 - Brutality certainly, though always humanity with Kobayashi so what would be the entryway point there.
Matt:
Cusack - (He gives a chilling portrayal of Control which is different from any other version of the character. His version is the man at the top of his game to the point he comes off what would be typically villainous as he lays out the complex and extremely specific manipulations he wants Leamas to utilize. Cusack, no pun intended, delivers every word with the immaculate control though where the future seems essentially something that is already written in his mind he’s just merely setting up one of his pawns for the plan.)
Ytrewq:
Seven Days in May 1990’s directed by Oliver Stone:
General Scott: Harrison Ford
Jiggs: Tommy Lee Jones
President Lyman: Christopher Plummer
Eleanor: Kathleen Turner
Senator Clark: Paul Le Mat
Paul Girard: William H. Macy
Colonel Henderson: Billy Bob Thornton
Seven Days in May 2020’s directed by Christopher Nolan:
General Scott: Hugh Jackman
Jiggs: Cillian Murphy
President Lyman: Gary Oldman
Eleanor: Emily Blunt
Senator Clark: David Harbour
Paul Girard: Josh Hartnett
Colonel Henderson: Sam Worthington
Harris:
Home Invasion - Henry Portrait of the Serial Killer (Honestly I’d prefer not having seen it)
Snap in Half - Bone Tomahawk
The basement - The Road
Zelda - Pet Sematary
Massacre - Come and See
The warehouse - Cure
First Kill - Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Basement - Zodiac
Sloth - Seven
Winkies - Mulholland Drive
Lucas:
I enjoyed her performance. I thought like Barinholtz she managed to dramatize the comedy a bit more effectively. Bringing with her moments of more outrageous reactions, which I thought she did quite well with, combined with a dramatic undercurrent of desperation between those sillier lines that I thought managed to elevate her performance a bit while still selling the comedy.
Mobland Cast Ranking:
1. Paddy Considine
2. Tom Hardy
3. Pierce Brosnan
4. Helen Mirren
5. Geoff Bell
6. Toby Jones
7. Peter Ferdinando
8. Lisa Dwan
9. Mandeep Dhillon
10. Joanne Fraggett
11. Lara Pulver
12. Emily Barber
13. Teddie Allen
14. Janet McTeer
15. Jordi Milla
16. Luke Malby
17. Gemma Knight Jones
18. Daniel Betts
19. Anson Boon
Louis: Thoughts on the rest of your top 6.
Louis: For the characters who represent the seven sins, what do you think of this cast?
Wrath: Toshiro Mifune
Pride: Takashi Shimura
Envy: Isuzu Yamada
Sloth: Minoru Chiaki
Gluttony: Daisuke Kato
Lust: Machiko Kyo
Greed: Masayuki Mori
Louis: Are you going to watch Weapons and/or The Naked Gun soon?
Louis, I feel like you already have, but how would you rank films adapted from those of Kurosawa? If/when you see Highest 2 Lowest, I’d like to know where that film would fall.
Luke:
Considine - (Great as per usual at this point and for a while it seems like he may be just really good in the thankless role of the put upon son and best friend belittled by many. Considine makes the most of that naturally by bringing so much genuine emotion and nuance to every bit of it. Because he avoids tropes playing instead into the sense of history of frustrations that defines the character. Something that he builds upon so his later explosions reveal just how much pent up anger he really has, Considine finds so much there where there is a tremendous power to revealing how much the “calm” family member is keeping inside to keep as calm as he can.)
Brosnan - (Brosnan gives a strong performance where he very much embraces his age within the workings of the character where he plays a contrast between the aging mobster not exactly with the same security he’s had, but with this attempted sense of virility. Something Brosnan plays around with as a constant tug between a man who seems professional and controlled at certain moments, to an old man trying desperately to be some version of his youth, to an old man raging at it all, including his insidious wife not knowing. Brosnan beautifully plays the different notes between fully messy emotions, somewhat controlled menace, and a bit of insanity that feels the most dangerous of all.)
Mirren - (Probably one of the most hateable characters of recent memory with just how hideous she is. Mirren though plays it with aplomb in a similar sense to Brosnan as someone holding onto something they no longer have, except Mirren plays it without any sense of the truth instead playing it with this vicious devotion to her madness. I especially love her moments of encouraging the psychopathy of another family member, in that moment showing the most warmth to anyone pushing for the worst ideas. Against her other moments of such grotesque hideousness that emphasizes her cruelties again and again.)
Bell - (Works as a contrast as someone who isn’t working at some genius level or any sort of extreme plan, rather just plays it as a thug who has done remarkably well in a thug’s business. Bell does well by playing it so straight in his character being just a blunt uncomplex force who uses the methods he has and importantly presents careful moments of genuine emotion because his character does care about his family in the same uncomplex way.)
Jones - (Comes in pretty late but does some expert bits of a creepy kind of expository character who makes a big impact quickly with a quiet unpleasant efficiency from Jones.)
8000’s:
Just about perfect.
Bryan:
Been a bit too busy to get out to the theater but will see them likely soon.
J96:
1. A Fistful of Dollars
2. Living
3. The Magnificent Seven (1960)
4. Django
5. The Magnificent Seven (2016)
Louis: Other than Amadeus, what are some films where you think there's a huge difference in quality based on what version/cut you watch.
Marcus: Honestly, most of them. There's usually a "Definitive" cut of every movie.
Louis: What are the top 10 most suspenseful film scenes you've ever seen?
Matt: Of course. I was more asking about the difference in quality between competing cuts of movies where there's some debate on what is best, like with official director's vs. original release.
Marcus: Ohhh, I understand, OK.
Marcus: Kingdom of Heaven HAS to be one of those.
Louis, thoughts on the trailer for Ballad of a Small Player?
Regarding Highest 2 Lowest
The problem with remaking a great film is that you must compare it to the great film and as somewhat expected Spike Lee’s rendition of High and Low doesn’t match up to that original masterpiece. But if you try your best to remove it out of your mind you can enjoy this remake, which honestly is almost a comedic or at least very lighthearted rendition, and it does seem intentional. As the crime is almost incidental, the tension is very light and thriller aspects not all that thrilling. The elements of class disparity, the moral quandary put to an ambitious rich man and the choices of a poor desperate man are there, however they never have the impact anywhere near the original film in that regard. One of the biggest reasons being the kidnapper, which Tsutomu Yamazaki’s character/performance is one of the best aspects of the original film as a menacing yet haunting depiction. Meanwhile here we have ASAP Rocky as a frankly goofy character, who also is a little unconvincing as performed and written given there is one aspect of his plan that would’ve required far more planning than would’ve been capable of for this doofus we see the rest of the time.
Having said that there are choices that do make for an enjoyable film, from expanding the chauffeur character (and casting Jeffrey Wright in the role), the choice of placing the rich man in the music business allows for an interesting alternative passion, along with Lee getting to show off his love for music and New York, do give the film more than a little bit of life. Even in its alternative approach is it truly a great film, no, but not a bad time at the movies.
Hadera - 2.5
Rocky - 1
Winters - 2
Thompson - 3
LaChanze - 3
Joseph - 3
Potts - 3
Pierce - 2.5
Christopher Wright - 2.5
Marcus:
Best version in parentheses, and only included film's where I've seen both versions.
Apocalypse Now (Theatrical)
The New World (Director's)
Touch of Evil (Murch)
Dumb and Dumber (Theatrical)
Blade Runner (Any non-Narration version)
J96:
Well that certainly was a series of captivating images, with Farrell going all in with a degenerate gambler certainly seems to have a lot of potential, along with wild looking Swinton, I'll certainly take it and hope it is great.
Harris:
A bit painful to narrow down maybe, per decade?
Regarding the Naked Gun:
Can we do the Pam Anderson Oscar buzz this year instead? As I’d be all for it this time. Anyway, finally a good parody again, what’s the difference? Honestly just better gags, better performances and enough of a devotion to telling a story. I guess that is quite a few things but this one pulls it off. Are the gags dumb, mostly definitely and in the best possible way. Are the performances bringing far too much conviction to this stupidity? Absolutely and that is what is the most essential feature of it. I had a great time with this one.
Neeson - 4
Anderson - 4.5
Hauser - 3.5
Huston - 4(His delivery of “You hit me in my belly” was just perfect)
Pounder - 3
Durand - 3.5
Louis: Rating and thoughts on both casts.
Yeah, Huston was unexpectedly the perfect guy for this sort of movie.
I kinda thought, and I don't know why, that Huston would be the one non-comedic part of the film, and just the villain who doesn't get to get in on the fun, but I'm glad I was wrong about that.
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Tsukasa, Nakadai and Kato.
Great to see Newman upgraded for Cool Hand Luke.
Louis: Do you mean a single list made up of one scene per decade, or individual lists for each decade?
So I guess Denzel and Jeffrey are being saved for full reviews. Nice. So, about where would you rank this film among Kurosawa adaptations?
Also, thoughts on the trailer for Black Rabbit?
Louis: Thoughts on 'It's Terror Time Again' from Scooby-Doo On Zombie Island.
Hey guys
Update on my Top 10 prediction of Louis' lead actor in 1967:
1. Delon
2. Mifune
3. Blake
4. Steiger
5. Poitier
6. Newman
7. Wilson
8. Mason
9. Poitier
10. Wilder
Hey guys
Update on my Top 10 prediction of Louis' lead actor in 1967:
1. Delon
2. Mifune
3. Blake
4. Steiger
5. Poitier (In The Heat of the Night)
6. Newman
7. Wilson
8. Mason
9. Poitier (To Sir With Love)
10. Wilder
Louis, you accidentally reviewed Naked Gun twice on Letterboxd.
Your thoughts on the recent casting choices of Wright and Spencer in the upcoming Death of a Salesman film?
Can be wrong, but I think Blake retains here.
Would love to see Poitier take it.
Totally! Give it to both Poitier and Steiger imo. They are both my win for that year in a tie.
Louis: Thoughts on the Anemone trailer.
I hope Day-Lewis will finally become the 2nd actor to have 10 fives on the blog.
The trailer looks awful.
Robert: From what you could remember, was there any noteworthy work in Noises Off (1992).
Luke: Everyone is good, but it is a true ensemble effort. None worth requesting a review.
Lucas and Louis: What was your preference between the 2 seasons of The Rehearsal, and why?
I kinda loved Million Dollar Baby, actually. One of Clint's best performances, up there with Unforgiven and Josey Wales.
Eastwood-5
Swank-4.5
Freeman-4.5
Mackie-3
O'Byrne-3
Martindale-1.5(Although I really put most of it on the script, because I know how talented she is)
Baruchel-1(This one is all on him, because I actually don't think it's inherently a terrible role, but he plays it in the most obvious, over the top, surface way possible)
Tahmeed:
Hadera - (Thought she was largely okayish but underwhelming in terms of truly making us feel concerned for her son. Her approach always feels a touch too light and seems underwhelming honestly for a scene partner for Washington in that regard.)
Rocky - (An utterly ridiculous performance that you can argue is the point but I’d argue that Rocky frequently seems confused with which was to take it. There’s moments where he’s more jokey if not honestly mostly goofy, then there’s others where he’s trying to sell the angst that absolutely fails to bring any of that dynamic power Yamazaki had, or suddenly he tries to be menacing where he is just silly. He’s best theoretically at just being a joke but there’s too much failure in everything around that to really even call that a success.)
Winters - (Kind of Lee trope of having at least one character yelling all their lines and being just over the top to sell some of Lee’s less subtle material. Winters certainly does that, but that doesn’t make it good.)
Thompson - (Certainly not Nakadai to Mifune in terms of stature of his co-star, though you could argue that shines the light on really downplaying the police to a certain degree in this version. His performance I think more or less gets the job done in bringing the calm expository with just brief moments of showing the emotion of moments effectively enough.)
LaChanze - (Brings a bit of extra character to her exposition moments but still not to a lot beyond a certain point.)
Joseph - (Decent enough in his scenes Washington as having a natural enough chemistry though it never becomes anything too dynamic.)
Potts - (Brings enough of a sense of the history between his and Washington’s character to sell the specific studio dynamics in quick moments and is effective as such.)
Pierce - (Comes in for some exposition which he does fine with but nothing too notable.)
Wright - (Wholly fine as the other teenager but also not notable.)
Neeson - (Seeing his guest spot on “Life is Too Short” suggested quite strongly that he could pull this off, and pulled this off he did. Neeson I think hits just the right notes of way too much conviction though with genuine comedic timing of moments that mess with that conviction. Neeson does not mind making himself look silly at any point, rather he consistently owns that fact with a determination that is best described as foolhardy in the right way. I really wish this film had done better because I’d be all for another foray into this type of specific serious conviction in comedic silliness.)
Anderson - (Hits truly the best notes, including her scat bit, where Anderson just goes for it in each and every silly scenario. And goes for it by playing it so seriously while being completely silly in her ridiculousness. Anderson I think elevates even beyond because curiously there are moments where she is playing genuine emotion effectively, without at all spoiling all the jokes around her, or she’s doing herself, but also doesn’t actually wipe that emotion away either. Anderson rather is just pitch perfect in mining every bit of comedy while being in this very specific way convincing as the noir heroine.)
Hauser - (Kind of the most expected ingredient within the scheme of the film so there is less surprise to him playing into the silliness, which I think he actually makes the right choice in not going too far into it either and indeed going for the more so George Kennedy approach of very much just filling in blanks of laughs around Neeson.)
Huston - (Honestly the performance I guess he was always revving up to play, as his tendency to sort of be a bit too overtly villainous in so many of his villainous performances just is absolutely perfect for playing into the comedy of this villain. Where he is the villain but he is a villain who is also absolutely hilarious in the silliness he does. Every time we break that Huston is hilarious by completely subverting the expected presence and playing dumb in the best possible way. Huston plays into gravitas and then makes fun of that gravitas.)
Pounder - (As stated previously here the casting really is much of it, but she certainly delivered on that promise.)
Durand - (Like Huston he works because in his early scenes particularly you get the cliched henchmen in an action movie performance fully to the point. So then when the film starts messing with that it becomes very funny such as his reactions to his infrared or especially his interrogation scene with Neeson where I loved just how confused he played the whole thing.)
Harris:
Individual lists, but maybe 3 decades at a time or something.
8000’s:
Tsukasa & Kato - 3.5(Both give good performances as noted. There’s a naturalism within the sense of generalized love between them and an earnestness in the scenes of portraying the specific passion together that pushes them forward. They aren’t higher only because I don’t quite feel their connection as deeply as what Mifune manages to portray in his empathetic care for their relationship than the relationship itself. They’re good, but overshadowed, despite Mifune not really playing it in a way to overshadow.)
Harris:
Great choices, I mean I’ll always be for any juicy part for Wright and that sounds like an ideal match…and maybe a second Oscar nomination.
J96:
Probably put it above Django.
Anonymous:
No, the film was just so good that I had to review it identically twice.
Luke:
I’ll have to disagree with Anonymous, although a few of the wideshots look a little strange without context, the degree of intensity and atmosphere wasn’t something I expected, and potentially being Sean Bean and Day-Lewis doing the Lighthouse in the middle of the woods could be something special…or maybe too much. But as a mood setting trailer this worked for me.
Louis: Top 10 most suspenseful scenes of the '50s and the 2010s, then.
Louis: Your thoughts on 'Washington on Your Side' from Hamilton? Diggs has one of my favorite deliveries in the show ending with 'this is the difference, this kid is out.'
Matt: Hopefully Million Dollar Baby will be upgraded to more people. It was the best Oscar nominee that year and also one of Clint's greatest films.
Hopefully Million Dollar Baby stays exactly the same, a dull dreary depressing slog with one of the worst supporting actor/lead actress combo wins.
Tim here: i really enjoy Million Dollar Baby a lot, i suppose Aviator more So, but still a lot. And i still think both Swank and Freeman were undeserved wins. If anything, Clint should have won
Post a Comment