Nawazuddin Siddiqui did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Detective Dayashankar Kapoor in Mom.
Mom follows a college professor Devki (Sridevi) who seeks revenge for her step daughter after she is brutally sexually assaulted by a group of men.
I will say Nawazuddin Siddiqui is an actor I reviewed three times before this and in each instance has been a disparate performance and character. Siddiqui physically in each instance looks very different, no more so than in this film as he appears as a mostly bald private detective with a style all his own, who happens to hear about the plight of Devki’s stepdaughter, being missing initially, who is eventually found near death. Unfortunately for Devki, due to the stepdaughter having been drinking her testimony is put into question and the four men are exonerated by the courts despite their obvious guilt leading Devki to take the law into her own hands. In order to do this more effectively she calls upon Siddiqui detective Kapoor to help her. Siddiqui’s initial appearance is well performed in establishing the idiosyncratic nature of his character. Siddiqui is once again very much doing his own thing and successfully in the way he holds himself as a purposeful peculiarity. Something that works as presents himself as a peculiarity, where Siddiqui specific eagerness to help he paints with the right ambiguity between someone who is genuine in his keen eyed interest as he almost looks like a dog waiting for a treat with his specifically curious eyes and particularly accentuated grin, that may denote almost an ambulance chaser version of a detective, or just a man who presents his genuine interest in helping in his own unusual way. Well it becomes the latter clearly when Devki utilizes his skills as a detective to track down and find different ways to seek revenge against each of the guilty men. Siddiqui continues his ambiguous but entertaining note, where basically what he does is offer some levity within the rather dark situation. He does so in a way that works just through his off-beat delivery that fits and works for this off-beat oddball character. So every time he comes in for some exposition or moment of maneuvering the revenge plan, Siddiqui comes at it with his own unique angle that fits this eccentric character. What Siddiqui does effectively is show sort of the growth and investment of Kapoor into the revenge that is beyond monetary benefits. Something we see when he keeps mentioning his mother, something that Siddiqui plays initially seemingly within the eccentricity of Kapoor, but as he continues to mention it his eyes effectively denote a real care and outright empathy where his mother represents what Devki is doing for her stepdaughter. Siddiqui utilizes just that much more investment, he doesn’t lose the eccentricity by revealing sincerity as the ambiguity leaves to show that his investment goes beyond monetary compensation. An element that is featured even more strongly in his final scene where he comes face to face with the most dangerous of the men. Siddiqui’s wonderful in this scene by playing the shades of a sense of dread, but with a bravery of a man who has no desire to suffer fools of this hideous man. His delivery of correcting the man about a correct pronunciation is pitch perfect because he manages to make it a joke to Kapoor but also with it this real belief in Devki as he spells out the man’s own doom. Siddiqui hitting his height in this moment that exemplifies his overall effectiveness in the role, that makes the comedic elements of the character speak to more than just the comedy, though it works straightforwardly as well, by funneling within a highly specific character that he makes believable, while also using it to allude to a greater depths to the real motivation of the man. It’s a strong performance that really other than Sridevi, manages the very tricky tone of the film to deliver another wholly engaging performance, that for Siddiqui is yet another performance that didn’t for a moment make me think of the other performances of his I’ve reviewed here.
12 comments:
Louis, your ranking of the films of Danny Boyle (based off your previous rankings, I predict you will have SM at the bottom), and once you’ve seen it, about where would you insert 28 Years Later?
J96:
Trainspotting
Shallow Grave
28 Days Later
Steve Jobs
Sunshine
T2
127 Hours
Slumdog Millionaire
Louis: Your rating and thoughts on Sridevi and the rest of the cast? I'm glad you appreciated Siddiqui's work as much as you did here, he's truly terrific in a different way compared to his other performances.
When Louis rewatches Blade Runner 2049 I hope he gives Ford another chance.
John Smith: Damn i now regret my request of hedlund i ådalen 31. I should have requested the best nawaz performance which is in photograph ):):):
I hope Jackman will remain in your top 5.
You plan on rewatching Lady Bird?
Louis: Could I have your thoughts on these scenes from the film?
The attack
The verdict
Ending (I was relieved that it didn't go full Promising Young Woman with Devki)
Shaggy: I agree, Ford is an easy 4.5 for me.
Louis: Have you watched any Ken Burns documentaries, and if so which is your favourite?
Louis: How many episodes from Boardwalk Empire Season 4 do you have remaining.
28 Years Later is neither a failure nor a knock out. The narrative very much is a part of hopefully a satisfying whole. As a piece it contains some effective tense moments, some interesting world building, and a few good performances, particularly Fiennes. But the biggest emotional moments also felt a bit muted, there are a few dumb character actions, the Alpha zombies are eeriely close to the same exact things in Army of the Dead, and Boyle does a bit of his famous overcooking with his edits. Still found it compelling enough albeit a film I always felt should've been more compelling than it is.
Comer - 4
Taylor-Johnson - 3.5
Williams - 3.5
Fiennes - 4
Riding- 3
O'Connell - TBD (Will have to see where they are going with it)
Post a Comment