Saturday 6 July 2024

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1998: Thomas Bo Larsen in Festen

Thomas Bo Larsen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Michael in Festen.

Festen depicts a family gathering for the family patriarch's sixtieth birthday...naturally things don't go according to plan. 

Frequent Thomas Vinterberg collaborator Thomas Bo Larsen plays Michael the son of the birthday man, and the brother of Christian (Ulrich Thomsen) who has a vendetta to expose his father as a pedophile sexual abuser of his family, after his and Michael's sister commits suicide. Where Christian is weighed down by that abuse, Michael is a very different man. In fact Bo Larsen's performance is one of a kind of id as we see him even coming to their gathering place without any sort of good grace and manners. Bo Larsen throws himself into the scene in a way where there is no sense of any kind of balance of the man. Bo Larsen's performance is that of this ball of energy that isn't exactly the most pleasant however, as it goes in about any direction with a sudden specified outburst, in moments of very unexpected cruelty whether that be a moment of seemingly more silly flamboyance before a celebration, or more disturbing moments of sexual cruelty, misdeeds or overt racism towards his sister's African American boyfriend. Bo Larsen presents it as all in this way a disturbing ease in the way he unleashes himself so naturally, that it seems as authentic as any moment of calm, and painfully presents Michael as just the way that he is.

The revelation that perhaps explains parts of Michael is in Christian who reveals his father's abhorrent treatments of his own children in a toast, that despite the revelation the party proceeds as though nothing has happened. None the less it seems to grant understanding to the behavior of each of the children even if it is never stated as such. As we see this most evidently so when their father speaks to Michael with very specific instructions for the ceremony, and the potential reward. The usually so brazen Michael is very much a different man, Bo Larsen becomes retiring a moment, fearful as quickly and just listening as a little boy would if he was on the edge between punishment and reward from a parent. Bo Larsen in just a brief mostly reactionary scene reveals so much of what defines Michael as a man broken by his father as Christian is, but how his own trauma reveals itself couldn't be more different perhaps in the specific nature of that trauma. As we see rather a man suffering in his trauma as is the case for Christian, Bo Larsen portrays the man in a way almost recreating the manner in some degree, as though the implication perhaps is that Michael may not have been sexually abused in the same way he was regardless still cruelly treated in some way. In turn Bo Larsen presents a man who covers up his own experience in part by hedonistic pleasures or becoming cruel in his own ways. It is all just the natural thrust within Bo Larsen's performance that creates this intensity within Michael as a man who clearly acts first and thinks later as related to both his urges and any reaction to any emotion. When their father attempts to deny any wrongdoing, Michael reacts by becoming his personal hatchet man by both physically beating Christian and leading a racist chant against his sister's boyfriend after the latter presents sympathy for Christian. Bo Larsen is impeccably vile in these scenes, with a key animalistic approach to every one of these moments in emphasizing Michael as a man doing it with very little thought, and just the most immediate action as to please his father. Change only comes when their living sister reads the suicide note of their deceased sister that supports all of Christian's claims, and Bo Larsen does much with his genuine reactions of a man who finally has to think for once, being less of a surprise and more of a forceful acceptance to something he likely already knew deep down within himself. Leading however to less thinking as he goes about brutally attacking his father instead as the same id action, though the difference being there can be any good of it. Bo Larsen earns the final scene of his character finally being supportive of his brother, because he doesn't make it this grand shift, rather a gentle one of a man no longer being caught within the viral poison of his father. Bo Larsen's performance most needs to ride the line of the blunt reality the film is crafting due to the overt nature of Michael, yet as extreme as his character is, he feels as authentic as any other element because of the honesty of Bo Larsen's performance which simply IS, Michael and realizes an authentic extreme. 

78 comments:

RatedRStar said...

I am very happy I requested him lol =D.

Louis: if what some others is said is true and that 1977 is next, 1977 is the year I am most excited about, there is a potential for so many hidden gems.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast

RatedRStar said...

Thomas Vinterberg getting that Oscar win and director nomination for Another Round is one of my favorite all time Oscar moments. 2020 is widely regarded as a terrible year for everyone but bizarrely, my favorite film and videogame so far this decade both come from 2020.

Shaggy Rogers said...

I wished 76 to come before 77.
I always thought 1976 was the worst of the 70s.

Tony Kim said...

Luke: That's not quite what I meant, but I'll just ask Louis about it directly.

Louis: How did you decide on that specific sequence when planning out your reviewing schedule? As in, the particular permutation of reviewing a year in the 90s, then the 70s, and then the 80s, etc. Did you review years based more on the quality of performances when first starting with the alternate 1971 lineup, and how has the schedule "evolved" since then?

Marcus said...

Tony: I think the first time around he simply chose the years he was most interested in. 1971 makes sense as a starting point, as there were a fair few high-quality and famous performances that were snubbed from the official line-up (McDowall, Wilder, Attenborough, Caine).

Tony Kim said...

Marcus: Yeah, that's the impression I got when looking through the older reviews.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Except House of the Dragon, have you seen any TV recently?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on this film's screenplay?

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Thoughts on Robert Loggia and Polly Bergen in The Sopranos?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on the trailer for F1?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Thomsen - 4.5(Although I think the film is close to a pure ensemble I think he gets just enough of a singular focus that I do think he is the lead. Anyway, he's terrific here in presenting the weight of the character's situation at all times, creating this sense of a seething anxiety of the man who is both coming from the trauma of his sister's death to the trauma that led to that, and just the quiet fixation on doing what he must do. There Thomsen is great in every revelation scene because he brings such a meek quality of just the years of frustration within it, yet he's just still barely eeking out that pain even though within it there is so much pent up anger. His reactions towards so many denials Thomsen depicts kind of accepting part of the rage as the expectation and even when he is being attacked Thomsen shows this nonviolent kind of resistance of the man expecting to face this before he began. He's terrific though in not being one note in the character's journey, in creating within the trauma the very powerful sense of the emotional connection to his sister the whole time, so you always understand what truly motivates him. With his performance being essential in creating the most powerful moment because his reaction within it helps to make it as haunting as it is.)

Moritzen - 4(Horrendous in the most effective way as he gives shades of just the domineering father in his early scenes where there's this ease in the way he puts forth his demands that has a certain innate cruelty even though he doesn't over do it to become over the top, and even allows the revelation to be quite shocking. Mortizen in the moments following portrays well the sense of obvious guilt but in equal measure the denial for much of the film as the sick man who has not nearly enough shame. His final scene even though it is a change, Mortizen still presents it in a way of the man not truly fully understanding his faults even if he accepts them.)

Steen - 4(Her horrified reactions are consistently effective in creating just the horror of her family and how she sees them particularly when her boyfriend becomes mistreated as well. She's mostly good with that, but truly great in reading the suicide note sequence where she delivers such a gut punch in giving such poignancy to the words, while in her reactions showing her own heartbreak just as she dleivers the truth.)

Neumann - 4(Quite effective in her parallel horribleness in presenting it as this sort of detached acceptance where she brings subtle shades to show that she is going through some emotion as related to the truth, and revealing it, however is at the same time blithely accepting it with this despicable calm. )

Henriksen - 3.5(Liked the sort of "wingman" quality in bringing this tough but supportive delivery everytime in showing someone who actually cares as well and is trying to promote Christian's intention.)

Dakinah - 3.5(Really captures that very specific awkwardness of going to your girlfriend's family's function and just trying to get by while dealing with the stray things that go your way.)

Tony:

Honestly it was mostly random. 71 was first because it had several notable performances/snubs, so it seemed like a good start, and then 39 was last because it is often hailed as such a remarkable year.

I feel I gave those before, particularly Loggia.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Vinterberg at his best manages to artfully mix extreme traumas of life, but with specific pointed bits of happiness that creates a particular catharsis. As for much of the film Vinterberg doesn't hold back in creating the horribleness of some of the character's, naturally and quickly granting the difficult family dynamics and tensions within this very specific celebration. With ease revealing everyone within conversations, and creating distinct parties in each of the characters and so many of the side people we come across through it. As with Vinterberg's best there is a key "hook" that sort of breaks the establishment of a controlled reality, whether it be the accusation in the Hunt or the drinking experiment in Another Round, here it is the revelation that then creates the upheaval for the situation and the characters where Vinterberg brilliantly crafts the way this basically unearths everything. Again though the key is his care for his characters as people rather than props, despite going through such horror, and allowing such genuine poignancy in the near darkness scene, that is a genius swing within the screenplay and makes this story more than one of just suffering.

Anonymous:

Very cliched song choice, visuals look fine, but there was nothing in that brief trailer that suggested this would be unique as a racing movie by any means. Almost seemed to say "I exist" as a film and gave little more than that.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous & Tahmeed:

Well the Bear, which I honestly found to be pretty disappointing. The two single character focus episodes I thought were terrific but even then, unlike Fishes last season, they weirdly barely impacted anything going forward unlike the single character episodes which built towards the later episodes. The first episode of the season, aka an episode long montage, I was on the fence on depending on if it would set us up for the season or just be a stylistic exercise, well since Carmy goes nowhere from that montage, in the end it felt like an indulgence. But honestly this whole season seemed like people sitting around not knowing what to do next, which it's okay to depict stagnation, but for basically 7 out of the 10 episodes? Carmy, Ritchie & Sydney barely go anywhere this season to almost a comical degree, and again, maybe a season break would've made sense here, as except the two focal point episodes, everything else could've been accomplished in 3 episodes. Also there was WAY TOO MUCH Matty Matheson this season, he's always been the nadir of the series, so it was strange they doubled down on his hijinks.

Any way Top Five...as while most are unquestionably good, I really didn't feel passionate about any of the performances past this set:

1. Abby Elliott
2. Liza Colon-Zayas
3. Jamie Lee Curtis
4. Jon Bernthal
5. Oliver Platt

HM: Joel McHale and Gillian Jacobs, who both do a lot with very little. I still remain very impressed by how menacing McHale is.

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the following scene from American Gangster? I feel like it suggests a better film than the one we actually got.

(www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tnudwh58rY&t=13s)

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on House Of The Dragon S2E4.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Unfortunately, I couldn't find your thoughts on Loggia and Bergen, so do you mind briefly giving them again?

And as an addition, thoughts on this scene, particularly in terms of the acting?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldsF16Gts2o

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Speaking of McHale and Jacobs, did you ever find the time to start Community, or did its first few episodes not do it for you?

Robert MacFarlane said...

As a Community diehard, I admit difficulty in recommending it based on any episode before the Debate 109.

Tony Kim said...

Robert: Really? It's been a while since I've watched S1, but I recall the early episodes being quite good, just very different from what would come later.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Brilliant House of the Dragon, and just like the last episode which involved an encounter between dragons, I loved a certain change they made to the source material. I have absolutely no idea how the show will top Rook's Rest when they get to the Battle Above God's Eye, as this was masterful.

Eve Best MVP, followed by D'Arcy, Mitchell, and Smith. Also found Fabien Frankel (who honestly looks like Colin Farrell with that haircut) to be at his most effective.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

I mean classic Bugs Bunny staple is the random song rendered in his way, here with the entertaining gag of the extra prep for his beloved carrot which he also serenades.

The type of 4-d chess that is the best types of gags with Bugs seemingly having the power to change the oven, though as a trick to entice Sam in there, only for there to be indeed a party in the oven after-all and with the cherry on top of Bugs just embracing the party rather than continue any sort of conflict after all.

Bryan:

American Gangster probably is a particularly strong example of a film, where you see the potential for greatness in moments or scenes throughout, even if the film frustratingly never achieves that greatness. This is probably one of the scenes closest to that because you have the promise of the star pairing here that mostly lives up to it in terms of Washington bringing all the thunder in trying to charisma his way out of his conviction and Crowe, smartly in this scene, underplaying it as Richie not falling for any of it and knowing exactly how to play Lucas in this instance without needing to for even in a moment "get into it" with Lucas. It's a scene that works on the actors and sort of meeting the corrupter against the uncorruptible within the scene and successfully bringing that innate life to the scene...though even then I'd say the scene is far from perfect with the cutting to the court room honestly being just distraction that only detracts from the rest of the scene.

Tony:

Bergen I think is completely fine in playing into a very specific type, in offering sort of that old school flamboyance though weathered by her age, though still playing into her old role as the mistress to the mob.

Loggia gives probably his best performance making such an impression in such short time, in offering potentially what could've been Tony's greatest rival, because unlike Richie, he was entirely charismatic yet just as determined and bitter about being seconded to an old "kid". Bringing such ease between the sort of old man everyone loves, with just the blunt brutality of plying his trade. With him probably having one of my favorite moments being the cut to his death stare at Tony while everyone else was being sycophantic in their bogus laughter.

Very interesting scene in terms of theoretically the best place for Paulie and Christopher's relationship, as Paulie is being genuinely fatherly, and even offers advice by not being so fixated on his deficiencies unlike Christopher. And is truly Paulie in being the perpetual survivor despite his massive flaws, with his often "so what" attitude saving him, with Sirico excelling in this different slightly warmer shade, which as he always did, despite being so specific a character always stretched his range when asked to. On the opposite end Imperioli
showing the consistent flaw of Christopher, sunk his depression and fatal analysis of his "arc", despite not seeing perhaps try to find any redemption is the often, yet his fatal flaw never being able to see a way out of the mob world that constantly digs him deeper into his despair he's too thick to fully understand.

Tahmeed:

Unfortunately I just keep not watching it, not purposefully, just need to rectify that at some point.

Luke:

I will concur with Tahmeed, a great episode where the battle did not disappoint packing the wallop as needed both emotional impact and physical spectacle. Although I'll also add that i also loved the haunting scenes of Daemon's literal haunting. Honestly might go D'Arcy MVP yet again, despite the brief screentime, as every time D'Arcy is onscreen Rhaenyra is such a captivating presence.

Tim said...

R.I.P. Jon Landau

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on these scenes from recent House of the Dragon episodes?

Otto's breakdown/'And we are the poorer for it'
Both young Rhaenyra visions (amazing how chilling Alcock is with such little screentime)
Rook's Rest betrayal

Louis Morgan said...

Maxxxine has a great aesthetic but a terrible script. Ti West the director succeeds in crafting an eye-catching and grimy thriller in the vein of De Palma, Friedkin and D'argento. Making use of his greater budget for some gnarly gore effects, and captivating production design/cinematography. Goth, though this might be the weakest of her three performances, still makes for a terrific lead. Unfortunately, all of this is let down by the script that is absolutely paper thin, which could be okay if it embraced just being fun, but like X and Pearl, has these odd delusions of grandeur about it. It is thematically hollow, like those two films, however the script is worse because it wastes more potential, with creating a proper black glove killer mystery, unfortunately no such mystery exists because if you can't guess the killer in about .00000000001 seconds of screentime, you're as dumb as every character in this film. Worse though is that scenes don't build on each other in any way. They occur just to do something for a scene, there's a PTSD subplot that just kind of goes away, and obviously was only for some jump scares, there's the whole notion of Maxine's attempt to become a star, which also just kind of exists and doesn't develop her as a character further. None of the characters develop, the plot barely develops, things just kind of happen. West is just not a good writer, and it's a shame as I think if he'd maybe just get a "story by" then, let a talented screenwriter do the rest, this whole trilogy could've been something truly special. Instead West the screenwriter lets himself down as a director and Goth, even more so this time than before. 

Goth - 4
Debicki - 3
Sumney - 2.5
Monaghan - 3
Cannavale - 3
Collins - 3
Esposito - 3
Prast - 1.5
Bacon - 3

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Goth.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

The Otto scene successfully gave more depth and detail to a character we mostly saw as a cold calculator, to show that he isn't *quite* as a heartless as all that in his pursuit for power, and remarkable in showing the man experiencing basically the buyers remorse for creating this backed side and causing the conflict within itself. Ifans makes the most in showing the man kind revealing the real person under the veneer now powerless within what his lust for power has wrought.

Both scenes are wonderfully disorienting in creating the way they go within themselves and the way it confuses us initially as it does Daemon in being faced with his crimes both times, with Alcock indeed being great, not as Rhaenyra as we know her or even knew her, but rather the haunting spectre of the memory of her representing Daemon's misdeeds.

An effective change from the source and making a more dynamic sense of the inner turmoil on each side, although also made more impactful by turning it much more into Aegon's attempted hero moment, only then to find him the punching bag for both dragons.

Luke:

Goth - (She does what she can, the problem is the film offers no genuine development or even consistency for her character. We have a vague sense of her wants, but everywhere there could be further exploration the film fails to write. Goth to her credit excels with anything she does have, conveying any emotion whether that is scared potential victim or resilient badass, which the film kind of switches on a dime for whatever she needs to be. Goth to her credit switches on those dimes as eloquently as she can, even though the film unfortunately doesn't let her build towards anything, just rather do whatever a given scene needs her to do. She does that, but sadly the limitations of the bad script limit her.)

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could I have your thoughts on the writing, voice acting and music of this scene from TeamFourStar's Dragon Ball Z Abridged? I believe I asked your thoughts on this same scene from the original show, and this is a (mostly) comedic spin on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW5_7MsFLuA&ab_channel=DragonballHaven

Bryan L. said...

I’m getting annoyed at the recent crop of horror filmmakers who just shrug at the craft of actual screenwriting.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Batman: TAS episodes Harley and Ivy, Harlequinade, and Harley's Holiday?

8000S said...

Louis: Kurosawa said that with Ran, he was trying to say that the gods, God, or whatever was up there feel sad about how human beings destroy each other and how even they feel powerless to affect their behavior.

Thoughts?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Jerzy Stuhr

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Gladiator II trailer.

Luke Higham said...

I liked what I saw from the footage, but the music choice took away all the gravitas that one would expect for a sequel to the original.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

All three are very entertaining episodes utilizing Harley particularly well by putting her into three unique situations, the first becoming pals with Ivy then having the comedic duo of Cold Ivy and flamboyant Harley, the second just having her be a specific thorn in Batman's side as an anchor of the ally, then the third being a series of unfortunate events. Each running with their strong core concept to make strong use of the character by putting her with something new each time, while each coming from her relationship with The Joker, but naturally expanding on her past that.

Tahmeed:

Within my limited context, I'll say the voice acting does a successful approximation of that type of dub voice acting though tilted ever so slightly in being more directed in a purposeful comedic element. And I'll say managed to have some dramatic emphasis in the more down to earth build up speech, though with some hilarious comedic moments from the "ows" when hitting his head, the "ahead" remark and even the "he doesn't have a soul" line though also working as a cold villain line.

8000's:

Well that makes sense, as the conflict within Ran, and Lear, is not about accidental circumstances rather human weaknesses consistently, despite the hubris of our central figure believing just be setting the power structure, everything will be fine, which of course it isn't.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

I honestly didn't hate the music choice, though I highly doubt anything like that will be in the final film so perhaps a strange choice there overall, but it didn't take away from my enjoyment of the trailer, and I think it is a bit of a shame that it has almost entirely controlled the comments on the trailer so far. As everything within the trailer visually looked great, I liked the promise of potentially juicy roles for Mescal, Washington, Pascal and Quinn. BUT, Scott's problem is rarely the visuals, it is the script. And while I like the promise of the various players going for the throne, Scarpa has yet to write a great film, so a strong introduction but again, whether or not he film will work on a story level will only be known when we can see the actual film.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Don't get me wrong, I was referring only to the trailer, I trust Gregson-Williams to do a solid job.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: What do you think of these Batman: TAS scenes, esp. Hamill's acting in the first clip?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOd79cgq8rQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz1O7SMh_-s

J96 said...

Hey. A little late to the party. I agree that the music choice felt out of place. Same for the "Napoleon" trailer. I don't quite have an opinion formed for this film. It looks "not bad". Maybe the next trailer will do it more justice.

Matt Mustin said...

The Superbowl spot for the original Gladiator used a Kid Rock song.

8000S said...

Louis: Not that it was some great part, but what do you think of either Rod Taylor or Cliff Robertson in Gavin's part in Psycho?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Going out on a limb and saying there's going to be some McPoyle brothers vibes from those co-emperors.

Tony Kim said...

Honestly, I thought the Jay-Z/Kanye song spiced up the trailer and gave it a fresh twist. And I'm not even a Gladiator fan.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

As someone who's not a fan of Kanye or Gladiator, have to say that was a strong trailer.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Yeah, I’m decidedly not a Gladiator fan, but the trailer was great.

Luke Higham said...

Generally speaking, I guess Hip-Hop/Rap ain't my cup of tea but fair enough guys. Anyway, on the performance side, I'm looking forward to Washington and Quinn the most out of the cast.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the We Live In Time trailer.

And Napoleon: Director's Cut has been rated by the MPAA, so hopefully it'll come before Gladiator II.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Before 98 ends, if you have time, watch the film Claire Dolan with a great performance by Katrin Cartlidge.

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Any upgrades to the Out Of Sight cast.

Tony Kim said...

Luke: I'm slightly curious about Hechinger because he's been starting to show up everywhere recently. And it looks like he might have the "biggest" performance in the cast, given that his role was originally Barry Keoghan's.

8000S said...

Louis: Your top 10 movie dads and moms.

Louis Morgan said...

With Kill came in expecting The Raid on a train, got that in part, but also got I Saw the Devil on the train in a way I did not expect. Viciously brutal in its action, which is in part for the thrills, but as much is in showing the very raw collateral damage of such an endeavor, not just in terms of literal viscera but rather more so in the human toll of every loss.

Lakshya - 4
Juyal - 4
Chauhan - 3.5
Maniktala - 4
Vidyarthi - 4

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts and category placements for the cast.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Out of curiosity, have you thought about how you'd categorize performances by nonbinary actors such as D'Arcy in your TV rankings? Giving it some thought, I'd probably wait to see how their team submits to awards bodies, although I can confidently say their performance so far is my favorite TV performance of the year

Tony Kim said...

Louis: One of my favourite "what could have been" casting stories is that the Breaking Bad writers originally wrote the part of Gale Boetticher for Philip Seymour Hoffman after hearing he was a fan of the show. Thoughts? How do you think his take would've differed from Costabile's?

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

One of the great scenes from the series, where Joker is genuinely upset, if in his Joker way, about Batman's "Death", realized within Hamill's fluctuating performance, going from his purely comedic, to his menacing as he reveals his rage, before digressing, playing nearly randomly in the best Joker way, where Hamill captures that beautifully by going from just funny to psychotic with such ease. Capper on the scene is the "burial", from Harley's kazoo playing, to Joker's tear perfectly undercut by his purely joyful final "that was fun".

Definitely more on the "kids" show aspect, but not in a bad way given it is a comedic episode. With genuine sweetness on both ends of Harley's and Batman's interaction in his show of kindness, before the kiss, that is made largely by Robin and Ivy's reaction to it.

8000's:

I mean neither Taylor nor Robertson is a better actor than Viggo Mortensen, and even he could only do so much. Could they have been better, probably but neither could've made it a remarkable role.

Luke:

I mean with such subject matter could be overwrought very easily, and the screenwriter's track record doesn't fill one with too much confidence. The trailer suggests could be either or, but Garfield and Pugh look promising at least.

Jonathan:

Move Clooney up to a 4 just.

8000's:

In terms of the best parents, or just the most interesting ones?

Luke:

Hard to avoid spoilers, but Lakshya is sole lead.

Tahmeed:

Since I haven't seen D'Arcy object to being placed in Best Actress for Emmy submissions or the Globe nomination, that's where I will place D'Arcy.

Tony:

Well, obviously love Hoffman as an actor but I think that could've been potentially distracting to have such a known presence in that relatively minor part, and feel maybe he would've had more scenes then. As I think Hoffman could've been as meek or pathetic if needed, but given his notoriety and strong presence, I think his theoretical Gale would seem less innocent and potentially seemingly more overtly culpable in Gus's eventual plan to remove Walter.

Matt Mustin said...

Sooo Donald Sutherland is kind of amazing in Without Limits.

8000S said...

Louis: The best parents.

RatedRStar said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

J96 said...

Rest In Peace Shelley DuVall.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

Tony Kim said...

RIP Shelley Duvall.

Luke Higham said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

Louis Morgan said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

RIP Shelley Duvall.

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
A said...

R.I.P. Shelley Duvall.

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Moms:

Mrs. Brisby
Ma Joad
Rachel Cooper
Aunt May
Bridget Fagan Brown
Mary Brown
Mrs. Incredible
Mother Parker
Molly Weasley
Mrs. Jumbo

Dads:

Shukichi Somiya
Atticus Finch
Waymond Wang
Henry Brown
Isaburo Sasahara
Man (The Road)
Henry Jones Sr.
Giuseppe Conlon
The Old Man
Calvin Jarrett

Jonathan Williams said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

8000S said...

Louis: I know that Nakadai's character literally dies at the end of Harakiri, but I think you could argue that he was already dead before he did that, in terms of soul, that is, since you know, his loved ones had all died, and all he wanted to do was join them.

What do you think?

Matt Mustin said...

RIP Shelley Duvall

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Well that's the whole point of the title of the film. Tsugumo isn't lying to the Lord when he comes intending to commit harakiri, he entirely intends to kill himself, he just intends to do it while laying as much waste estate before doing so.

Marcus said...

Louis: Your ranking of all the rulers of Westeros across Game of Thrones and House of the Dragon S1 from least to most incompetent.

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

The actual kings or all the different leaders?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Just finished Late Spring, and I agree completely that Shukichi Somiya is one of the best film dads.

Tony Kim said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tony Kim said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tony Kim said...

Louis: Have you ever listened to any film-related podcasts? Have you read any nonfiction books on filmmaking or film history that have been of interest to you?