Matthew McConaughey - Dazed and Confused - Alright Alright Alright. Dazed and Confused follows multiple high school students on the last day of school in the 70's. Matthew McConaughey does not play one of the students instead appears as a man, David Wooderson, in his twenties who prefers to spends his nights still hanging around with the high school crowd. This was McConaughey's first role, outside of course being murdered on Unsolved Mysteries, and well he already had it, what ever it was. This role is a great example of the sort of McConaughey wackness that is very specific and something that only he is able to pull off. McConaughey is very entertaining here with his dumb grins, and excessively relaxed delivery bringing life to a guy whose more than a little stuck in arrested development. The thing is though is he loved every minute of it. McConaughey is a delight here though as he makes his role of Wooderson a highlight of the film. McConaughey technically does not avoid the underlying sleaze related to the role, but rather wears it in a way that makes him kind of endearing in a strange way including his speech about the agelessness of "high school girls". It's a fun performance that really could have only been delivered by McConaughey.
Monday, 23 January 2017
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1993
Matthew McConaughey - Dazed and Confused - Alright Alright Alright. Dazed and Confused follows multiple high school students on the last day of school in the 70's. Matthew McConaughey does not play one of the students instead appears as a man, David Wooderson, in his twenties who prefers to spends his nights still hanging around with the high school crowd. This was McConaughey's first role, outside of course being murdered on Unsolved Mysteries, and well he already had it, what ever it was. This role is a great example of the sort of McConaughey wackness that is very specific and something that only he is able to pull off. McConaughey is very entertaining here with his dumb grins, and excessively relaxed delivery bringing life to a guy whose more than a little stuck in arrested development. The thing is though is he loved every minute of it. McConaughey is a delight here though as he makes his role of Wooderson a highlight of the film. McConaughey technically does not avoid the underlying sleaze related to the role, but rather wears it in a way that makes him kind of endearing in a strange way including his speech about the agelessness of "high school girls". It's a fun performance that really could have only been delivered by McConaughey.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Glad all of them got good scores, at least.
Louis: What would you say is the most depressing film that you've ever watched?
Keaton was a hoot. Glad you loved him.
Louis: Could I have your rating and thoughts on the rest of the cast in Much Ado about Nothing?
Louis: Thoughts and ratings on the rest of the cast of A Bronx Tale?
Ahh I was hoping Keaton and McConaughey would be a little higher but this is cool. Also I totally agree about Reeves, it's impossible to take him seriously when he tries to be an imposing villain but that's really the whole point of Don John as a character.
Louis: I checked the 97 results and I only saw your thoughts on Leguizamo in Spawn. Thoughts on White, Sheen and Williamson?
Tahmeed:
Maybe Leaving Las Vegas, as fictional films go.
Washington - 3.5(Washington's delivery is just ever so rusty, but not enough to be problematic. What's more important though is the amount of charm he provides in the role, and really brightens the screen in the way the Prince should.)
Leonard - 2(I'm noticing that he's pretty bad in most things. His delivery is very stilted and I'd say he's even blander than was the intention for the role.)
Beckinsale - 2.5(She has the right sweet simplicity down, and works in terms of her purpose in the story. I don't think she goes much further than that, and is very much overshadowed by everyone else, except Leonard who she overshadows.)
Blessed - 3(Good as per usual but a small role.)
Staunton - 3(Same as Blessed)
Reeves - (Hard to analyze in a way. Everything that Reeves does provides a pretty laughable villain, but it all works so well for the part.)
Charles:
Capra and Brancato - 2(Unfortunately both don't quite have it, and it is really De Niro and Palminteri that make the film work, even past the fact that they directed and wrote it. They're not bad entirely but they have bad moments unfortunately. They have decent moments too but it's easy to see what stronger actors could have done with the part.)
De Niro - 3.5(One of his better "late" works. De Niro is good in also providing the two sides of the man in that he brings the right warmth to the caring father, and passion in his determination to keep his son away from the troublesome elements of the neighborhood. De Niro however does well to allude to the father's own insecurities which also keeps from being his son's only father figure.)
Pesci - 3.5(A pretty good one scene wonder as Pesci instantly gives life to his character's own history with Sonny. Pesci's moving in revealing his own debt of sorts to the man, while also still carrying a certain edge reflecting where his character also comes from.)
Anonymous:
White - 2(He's a charisma deficient performer unfortunately. He definitely tries in the dramatic scenes, but he's never very compelling. Worse though is he just doesn't have the presence needed to lead the film, or convey his journey of redemption of sorts.)
Sheen - 3(He definitely hams it up a bit but to an entertaining extent for the most part.)
Williamson - 3(Mainly there to offer a bit of gravitas with exposition, something he certainly brings.)
Louis: Do you have more extended thoughts on Moonlight now, or do you reckon you'll wait till the (hopefully inevitable) review?
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Ken Page in Nightmare Before Christmas?
God, I hope Your Name makes it in for Best Animated Feature. It's a goddamn beautiful film.
Louis: Could you watch Jackie tonight.
Robert:
Page - 3.5(Always felt Oogie Boogie was a little underrated as animated villains go since I do think he makes a pretty strong impact for his very limited screen time. Page's work adds so much to it as he is a lot of fun with his manic delivery, yet there is this certain intensity about that actually makes his madness genuinely menacing even while being just quite entertaining.)
Luke:
Maybe.
20 minutes to go =D.
Michael Shannon got in for Nocturnal Animals instead of Hugh Grant.
Post a Comment