Ian McKellen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Sherlock Holmes in Mr. Holmes.
Mr. Holmes is an effective film about life of elderly Sherlock Holmes where he's tasked to solve a few mysteries of a different sort.
The most substantial portion of the film follows Holmes at the latest part of his life in retirement in an English cottage where he is tended to by the housekeeper Mrs. Munro (Laura Linney), and spends time with her son Roger (Milo Parker). McKellen actually is aged up considerably in the role in terms of makeup but also through his performance. McKellen adds to this through his troubled movements, and his rather cracked voice as Holmes. He carries himself with a slow pace, and even amplifies the makeup through his often haggard expression. I was actually somewhat concerned on my first viewing that McKellen might be reducing Holmes to a crotchety old man type. This was merely through his introductory scene where he corrects his fellow train passengers that an insect in sight is in fact a wasp and not a bee. McKellen brings a considerable disdain in his voice as he states that a wasp is different creature entirely, but as the rest of the film reveals this is merely to illustrate Holmes's attitude towards wasps, and perhaps a bit of exasperation just from his long trip, rather than his normal attitude towards life. McKellen does not make Holmes a curmudgeon as he finds already some enthusiasm, though still reduced from age, when he goes about his one remaining passion in life which is tending to his bees.
An even better side of Holmes is quickly shown by McKellen when the housekeeper's son Roger inquires about one of his cases that he had been writing about. McKellen is splendid in bringing this spark of light into Holmes the moment he is asked about his old days as a detective. There is such a nice light touch of humor McKellen brings as he calmly discusses his old method of deciphering people's intention, I particularly love the quiet sense of pride McKellen shows when Roger states that the process as the thing that Holmes does. McKellen though is quite moving though as he is asked for more at the time, and portrays the sorrow in the man as he struggles with his memory. McKellen is terrific in finding this internal frustration in Holmes any moment where he must recall something, and McKellen finds this anguish to perhaps be even more considerable as Holmes was once a man made by his mind essentially. Of course this leads to what seems like an essential question on McKellen's performance, which whatever his exact approach to Sherlock Holmes is. This something always rather interesting to examine considering all the different portrayals of the detective that have been seen over the years.
McKellen even as the elderly Holmes is able to find his Sherlock Holmes so to speak. McKellen finds this exact method of the man as he keeps this observant quality about him at all times, as though he's always, just by instinct, observes carefully all those around him. McKellen in his body language and the way he speaks make this precise manner to the man who does try keep these exact movements just as he once did, and even reveals a bit of a frustration almost when his age keeps him from being exactly as he wishes he should be. McKellen does something essential for the character in that he finds basically how Holmes's views the world, which is that of the logical spectator. McKellen plays this well by allowing a cursory glance to make this appear as though this might be that of a cold man, but as we get to know Holmes through the story that's not the case. McKellen's performance keeps this needed internalization in terms of Holmes's emotions. McKellen does not make this a case of an unemotional man, rather he instead presents a man almost more comfortable keeping his distance while dealing with anything the way he is most accustom to, which is logically. McKellen shows this in almost a delay of a personal reaction at times, as though Holmes can't help but try to find the solution before even speaking of the problem.
There are a set of flashbacks throughout the film which depict Holmes's final case which involves a man who wishes Holmes to get to the bottom of his wife's strange behavior. McKellen is outstanding in finding so well the youth of the character, even though he's obviously not young still. McKellen though presents Holmes as a man absolutely still in his element as he brings such confidence and grace about the man as he goes about the case. McKellen speaks with such unquestionable authority revealing the intelligence of the man in every glance, and movement. McKellen's approach though Holmes, which I find particularly special, is the way he portrays this joy of performance. In this case not McKellen own performance, although I'd say you can see that as well, but the joy that Holmes takes in performing his duties as detective. McKellen creates the idea that Holmes is a man who's great at his job and loves doing it. In creating this idea though McKellen actually gives understanding to Holmes's somewhat closed off emotional state suggesting that satisfaction he found in his investigations was on the surface enough to seemingly have a fulfilling life. As one would expect Holmes quickly figures out the secret behind the case, and McKellen brings the expected energy you want from the typical moment where Holmes quickly deciphers each piece of evidence.
The end of the case though is Holmes discovering the woman Ann Kelmot (Hattie Morahan) purposefully tried to string along Holmes to make it appear as though she's going to murder her husband, but naturally he figures out that she in fact plans to commit suicide. McKellen is outstanding in portraying the somberness in the man, that is hidden behind the joy he gets from his work, as he admits to his own loneliness in an attempt to convince Ann not to go through with her plan. When she offers a completely alternative plan that they deal with their loneliness together McKellen's reaction is flawless. He's heartbreaking by for once showing Holmes caught off guard and for once unable to actually decipher what is being presented to him since only an emotional, rather logical, response is possible. McKellen renders the moment beautifully as discovers such genuine pain in Holmes in his usual hesitation as it seems he could say yes, but then returns to proper detective form to simply instruct her to go back to her husband. This leaves to tragedy though when she still goes through with her plan, leaving Holmes to observe that he made the logical, yet wrong decision. There is such a poignancy McKellen finds in his expression that shows how haunted Holmes is by the mistake, and that his retirement was simply inevitable as there was no way he could find joy in that work again.
That brings us to Holmes's current life where technically he is an odd state as for much of the time since he cannot recall what even made him retire in the first place. This in no way brings his joy back fully, the fact that he failed is one thing he does remember, but he keeps that certain detachment. McKellen suggests that the old investigative joy returns in his interactions with Roger, as the boy is also fascinated by Holmes's old exploits. McKellen and Parker are charming together finding well the connection as Holmes is allowed to remember the good of his past again, though the pain seem to lie dormant. The detachment though surfaces in his interactions with Roger and his mother. There's two scenes that I especially love when Roger insults his mother, and as usual Holmes's reaction is slightly delayed by McKellen yet considerable in his dismay when it comes as he portrays such palatable passion that he never treat someone with such little regard. The other comes after Holmes has managed to recall how he failed his final investigation, and Roger has been seriously wounded by what looks like bee stings, though Holmes knows better. Holmes wishes to protect his bees, from Mrs Munro's wrath, when she calls him out on his distance, McKellen makes it a very moving moment as he shows Holmes's break down allowing the emotions rather than logic rule for once in the moment to show just how much he has cared this entire time. McKellen's work here is excellent in that he not only finds his own captivating take on the often played character, but also in creating an affecting portrait of man coming to terms with his life.
39 comments:
This might just be my personal favourite of his. :)
Louis: YESSS its a five, do you think this could be well, the final hurrah for Ian McKellen, same with Tom Courtenay in 45 Years?
RatedRStar: Your nominees for 87 and 88?
I found the film a bit uninteresting, but he's simply marvelous.
Anonymous:
No reason to believe that for either of them. McKellen always seems like a particularly youthful guy, and Courtenay seems to be actively getting back into films again.
Can't wait for the last two reviews. :)
Great review. He definitely was amazing in every scene. Can't wait for Fassbender and Hardy.
Louis: What are your thoughts on Lewis Milestone, Michael Curtiz and William A. Wellman as directors?
Absolutely brilliant work that I have no qualms in calling his best work of all-time. One of my favourite actors, and my top male performance of 2015 by miles.
Really glad how you covered how each aspect of his characterization builds up to that conclusion.
Louis: Ranking of your top 5 McKellen performances.
This has to be my favorite McKellen performance as well.
I loved this performance, definitely among his best work.
Robert: Have you seen The Witch yet.
Re-examining these reviews, I won't be surprised if either one of Jordan or Foster make it into the top 5 either. McKellen's review does feel like it could be a winner's review, but we'll wait to see about Hardy and Fassbender.
Calvin: I'm glad it's quite unpredictable at this stage, especially compared to last year when Gyllenhaal's win felt like an absolute certainty.
I'd be pleased if any of the three Brits won.
Anonymous: I'm completely amazed that Louis' given 29 fives for 2015 and still has two reviews left to write. :)
Looking at some of your rankings of older years, Louis, and I'm wondering why for 2001 Danny Glover is ranked so low for Royal Tenenbaums.
Luke: This has been truly a great year.
So Franciosa actually won a Volpi Cup for Best Actor for his role in A Hatful of Rain. Wow...just wow.
Funny you mention Francisco, I'm watching him right now in Across 10th Street and he's surprisingly decent. Yaphet Kotto and Anthony Quinn are great in it too.
Calvin: Looks like Mr. Franciosa gave another good performance.
Anonymous: He's been surprisingly good in some things I've seen him in. Agree that he's terrible in the likes of A Face in the Crowd and A Hatful of Rain, but he definitely had talent.
Calvin: Have to see those good performances from Franciosa. And of course, I still have to see a masterful performance from Arthur Kennedy.
I think he's pretty great in Lawrence of Arabia. My favourite in the cast after O'Toole, Sharif, Quayle and Rains.
Although I think Quayle gives the most impressive performance in the film with how much he does with such little material.
Calvin: Louis needs to see a performance that is truly masterful from Kennedy. And I'm quite sure that he's going to give him a 4. He would be a 4 for me as well.
Anonymous: your ratings for the Lawrence of Arabia cast
O'Toole: 5
Sharif: 5
Guinness: 4.5
Hawkins: 4/4.5
Rains: 4.5
Kennedy: 4.5
Quinn: 4
Quayle: 5
Calvin: I think I already did this, but, oh well.
O'Toole: 5
Sharif: 5
Guinness: 4,5
Hawkins: 4,5
Quinn: 4,5
Rains: 4,5
Quayle: 4
Kennedy: 4
Calvin: Kennedy must have been a great Biff Loman in Death of a Salesman. I mean he won a Tony Award and Cobb didn't for his role as Willy.
I really want to see footage of Cobb, Kennedy and Philip Seymour Hoffman's performances as Willie Loan. Dustin Hoffman was great as him though.
Calvin: Cobb was one hell of a character actor. Played older characters that were younger than his age. Death of a Salesman, Golden Boy, Man of the West (The best thing of the film)...
Really need to see Man of the West.
Calvin: I don't know if you are going to like it. Cooper is supposed to play a 36-year old ex-outlaw, yet he was 56 at the time of filming. But the film is considered Anthony Mann's masterpiece.
I generally like Cooper a great deal so I will probably take to it.
Calvin: I saw and I found it disappointing, to say the least.
*it
Anonymous:
Milestone - (At his best, and even at his somewhat middling, he was a man who had real daring vision with his work. All Quiet on the Western Front deserves mention with Milestone as it is stunning to see what he did given the time, and the nature of so many films at the time. There's nothing stagy about his work as he clearly sought to make use of what film was truly capable. From what I can tell of his later work though his passion obviously diminished quite a bit)
Curtiz - (Being as prolific as he was obviously there were going to be a few lackluster efforts. When he was on though he was really on. A visually captivating director when he chose to be yet knew when to pull back and allow the emotions to shine through when they needed to. He clearly had an eye for character, and certain films so quietly yet powerfully build right within the action)
Wellman - (I've said it before I'll say it again, he is one of the most underrated of the period. Again he was someone who knew how to capture the atmosphere of setting, his films tended not to just be anywhere, he made you know where it happened. What I find most notable about his work is how well he would tell these rough films, yet knew how to underline them with such honest humanity)
Calvin:
1. Richard III
2. Mr. Holmes
3. Apt Pupil
4. The Fellowship of the Ring
5. Gods and Monsters
The top two could change with time though.
Great review. He was amazing and he had one of the best years of his career.
Louis: Who would be your cast and director for:
Road to Perdition (1930's version)
Cop Land (1970's and 1980's version)
Post a Comment