Tuesday, 22 December 2015

Alternate Best Actor 1962: Laurence Harvey in The Manchurian Candidate

Laurence Harvey did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Staff Sergeant Raymond Shaw in The Manchurian Candidate.

The Manchurian Candidate is an effective thriller about a two men being brainwashed by communists with being forced to commit nefarious deeds in order to control the U.S. government from within.

Laurence Harvey plays the central pawn to this plot Raymond Shaw, though Frank Sinatra's Captain Marco is also given ample time who begins to uncover the scheme due to a recurrent nightmare. Harvey's part here is a rather thankless role actually, but it is an interesting one to examine to see what exactly Harvey does within these certain limitations. The first challenge of the part is in the character of Raymond Shaw, who is suppose to be unlikable, which is very important to the plot since one of the things that tips Marco off that something is wrong is that the brainwashed army unit have all been forced to recite how great of a guy Shaw. Well Harvey certainly fulfills this need of the part as he plays much of the role in a very distant and almost viciously cold manner. He makes Raymond like a sharpened stone as he seems unwavering in his manner yet there is something most unpleasant in this determination. This is the right approach though not only to fulfill that plot point, but also Havery utilizes it to show where Raymond has come from. In his scenes with his horrible mother (Angela Lansbury) and his step father we see how Raymond would have become this way.

Harvey's very good in making such a considerable anti-chemistry of sorts in his scenes with his "parents". Harvey plays it as though Raymond is always on the attack with them as he is quite aware of how despicable they both are, and really he does not even know the half of it. Harvey makes Raymond at his most raw here as his searing anger is a constant in his interactions with them, and even when it is just his mother talking Harvey is very effective in the way that he shows that Raymond is pained by her very presence. Harvey makes this as almost a transference in his interactions with everyone else as at the very best he's a bit distant, and at the worst he still seems a bit hostile as though his upbringing has left him at a constant unease with everyone. The only relationship we see that is opposed to this is Raymond's romantic one with the daughter of one of his stepfather's staunchest opponents. This scenes are done in an almost an excessively simple way, which works as a contrast to the details of the main story, but Harvey uses them well. Harvey brings a sincere happiness in Raymond in these scenes, that almost has a certain timid quality to it as though Shaw not only is new to it, but almost does not quite know what to say when dealing with this new experience.

Now of course Raymond purpose in the film is being used as an agent for the communists to commit their plot, which is actually spearheaded by his own mother. These scenes may seem standard enough in portraying just the detached zombie who carries out orders. Harvey does handle them well by never making it seem corny but rather chilling in depicting the single minded yet blank manner of Raymond as he carries out the orders no matter how brutal they may be. Even when Raymond kills it is nothing but a straight forward act as though he is opening a door. This might seem like a minor detail but Harvey uses it brilliantly in his last scene of the film, which also the best scene of the film. As it seems Raymond is still programmed to carry out the assassination which will put his stepfather in power. Suddenly as Raymond is pulling the trigger though Harvey suddenly reveals something that had been lacking in all the other kills, an emotional fury in his eyes, as it becomes clear Raymond is of his own will as kills those who had always been using him instead. Harvey makes the final seconds of his performance surprisingly heartbreaking as he reveals Raymond finally in full control of himself though only to be in the horror that his mother has put him. There is a satisfaction that Harvey reveals at their deaths as well as relief, though also a terrible grief as Raymond is well aware of what his life has been. The moment is swift yet the power of it is palatable due to Harvey so successfully finding the cruelty behind the use of a man as simply a tool.

358 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 358 of 358
Anonymous said...

Luke: Now that I think about it, I see more chances of Cranston winning the Oscar, the Golden Globe and the SAG than DiCaprio.

Anonymous said...

Can anybody watch Trumbo and post the ratings because I dont think I want to watch it without some help as to whether it is good or not?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'll wait until SAG, though if he were to get nominated, hopefully he will take Redmayne's spot, not Depp's.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'll watch it tomorrow morning, as I've almost finished In The Heart Of The Sea and plan on watching Suffragette tonight.

Michael McCarthy said...

I actually saw it a couple weeks ago, I just didn't feel the need to say anything.

Bryan Cranston: 3.5
Diane Lane: 3
Helen Mirren: 3
Louis C.K.: 4
Michael Stuhlbarg: 3.5
Elle Fanning: 3
John Goodman: 2.5
David James Elliott: 3
Dean O'Gorman: 1.5

Luke Higham said...

In The Heart Of The Sea
Hemsworth - 3
Holland - 3
Gleeson - 3.5
Rest Of The Cast - 2.5/3

Anonymous said...

Michael and Luke: Your thoughts on the films?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I thought it was watchable, though a missed opportunity in my opinion. The story deserved a far better director.

Anonymous said...

Luke: So, have you finished watching Suffragette?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Another 40 minutes.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis, what's your ratings and thoughts on Jack Warner and George Cole in Scrooge?

Luke Higham said...

Suffragette
Mulligan - 4.5
Gleeson - 3.5
Whishaw - 2.5 (Wasted again) :(
Duff - 3
Carter - 3
I thought it was fine.

Anonymous said...

Luke: What about Streep?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: N/R. She's on screen for two minutes, and doesn't make much of an impact.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Do you think there are chances of Mulligan getting a nomination? I'd say only at the BAFTAS.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: She's definitely not getting nominated for an Oscar and I'm not even confident for a BAFTA nomination either.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Which is sad, because I would love to see her get another Oscar nomination.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Me too. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: I think Louis will find Man of the West (the film I requested for the bonus reviews) to be pretty flawed.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I guess you're hoping for a 4.5 or more with Cooper.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Let's just say that Cooper was miscast in that movie. He was 56 at the time of filming, and he's supposed to play a 36 year-old man. Heck, Lee J. Cobb plays an older man than Cooper's character despite being ten years younger than Cooper.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'm looking forward to that review. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: I have to say I wasn't impressed with the film itself. It is very flawed when it comes to certain scenes, the music and of course, Cooper and Cobb's miscasting. I much preferred Cobb's performance to Cooper's. Cooper was certainly unfit for darker roles. Stewart might have been a better choice, but he was also way too old, although he was seven years younger.

Anonymous said...

*than Cooper.

Anonymous said...

Luke: This film also inspired Eastwood's Unforgiven.

Anonymous said...

Luke: But I'm not expecting Louis to be impressed with Cooper's performance, and I wasn't impressed with him either. But we'll wait and see, right? :)

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Actually I watched Trumbo yesterday.

Probably not in regards to the Revenant (in fact I'll probably having to do the long wait) but I'll be seeing The Hateful Eight Tomorrow.

Anonymous:

Arquette - 2.5(There's nothing wrong with her performance but she really does not stand out in a positive or negative fashion. She's mostly just there. The film really is all about Morse, Mortensen, and to a lesser extent Bronson.)

Hopper - 3(There's nothing to the role, but Hopper's good enough to give enough color in just his few moments of screen time to make him more than just a background character)

Golino - 3(Similar to Arquette in that she is overshadowed but I do feel she makes a bit more of an impact offering decent enough support though never exactly shining on her own)

Dennis - 3(Her screen time is extremely limited but I thought she found her character's distressed state in well enough fashion for her like one scene she's in)

Niven - 2(Everything that's not Sellers is very easily forgotten in this film Niven including. He feels like he's coasting the entire time. He can be charming but that's not the case here.)

Cregar - 3.5(Not enough of Cregar if you ask me, but that's the case of every film I've seen him in. Cregar is great as a particularly friendly devil and makes his bookend scenes two of the best scenes of the film thanks to his mere presence. He's such a grand perfectly diabolical creature.)

Let me check on Marvin and Wayne, as I might have given my thoughts before.

Anonymous:

Really in regards to Cranston over DiCaprio? I really don't see any reason to doubt DiCaprio, the only reason I've seen is the nature of the role and the nature of the film. Well the Academy loves Inarittu and they're pretty big on DiCaprio as well. Hugh Glass might not be the typical Oscar winning role, but they'll go outside of their comfort zone from time to time if they really like the actor. Jordan Belfort is not the type of role that gets nominated either, but DiCaprio managed to.

Matt:

Warner - 4(A great three scene wonder as he gives so much life to his sleazy yet extremely endearing businessman. You completely understand his character, and makes his philosophy quite endearing in just a few scenes. With him as the mentor you can easily see how Scrooge would be swayed into a somewhat similair lifestyle.)

Cole - 3.5(He does not exactly go one to one with Sim, but that's the case for all the younger Scrooges besides Albert Finney. Cole though is given more than most actors as young Scrooge though and makes the most of it. His slight arc of going from a hopeful young man to a bitter hateful one is effectively handled as well as rather moving in parts)

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on Trumbo, as well as Your ratings & thoughts on the cast.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Well, call this a hunch, but even if Trumbo is getting mixed reviews or whatever, I can see them awarding the Oscar to Cranston instead of DiCaprio, due to veteran status. DiCaprio probably will win an Oscar when he's 60, like Paul Newman.

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: No way are they giving Cranston the win for this. No way at all. A nomination would be his award.

Anonymous said...

Matt: So who do you think might win the award?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Get you those soon.

Anonymous:

Cranston's doesn't exactly have veteran film career status, say in the same way Alan Arkin or James Coburn had when they won. If the tide is going DiCaprio, which I feel it is, that wouldn't stop it anyway. Peter O'Toole couldn't win for Venus after all. Besides one could easily argue DiCaprio is just as much, if not more than, of a film "veteran" as Cranston. Cranston's film career started only a few years before DiCaprio's, and Cranston did not get prominent roles until long after DiCaprio.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Have you seen Lonely Are The Brave with Kirk Douglas?

Calvin Law said...

DiCaprio winning is pretty much set in stone. If you've seen the film it is a VERY Oscar baity performance (although interestingly enough, the film itself, not so much).

He's very good. Oscar-worthy? I would disagree. Far from his best work, and in fact watching him in Catch Me if You Can the other day just reminded me how much more I love him in roles he utilises his natural star charisma for. I won't mind him winning since none of my top 5 besides Damon are going to be nominated. Still...

Anonymous said...

Calvin: Yes, I've seen the film and he's easily a 5 for me.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: different strokes for different folks I guess.

On a separate note I'm also finally starting on Breaking Bad. And I definitely see what I've been missing. Cranston is so effortlessly fantastic. Aaron Paul I feel I might need a bit of time to get used to but he's excellent too.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Trumbo basically hits the same beats as The Front almost forty years ago now except replace with the morally questionable protagonist with a self-righteous one. The film uses a heightened style as though it is a 50's movie, though it makes a mistake believing that 50's film were all over the top, and the actors were incapable of subtly. That approach as well as some of the imitations can be a bit grating, the film itself though is enjoyable in parts, if a bit thin, and moving at times, if a bit on the nose, in telling the story of the black list in the broad strokes that certainly does not avoid straw men and simplifications. It's nothing great, but hey I'd describe it as watchable.

Mirren - 3.5(She's one note evil, though not in a fashion that it's her fault. Every scene she's shown to be essentially personally leading a witch hunt. She's entertaining in delivering that one venomous note, though frankly the film actually could have let her play it up even more since the intentions of Hopper are so simply used)

Lane & Fanning - 3(Both are good in just portraying a quiet warmth with just the right passionate disapproval at times when it is required that they question Trumbo. They're not given too much to do but they do well with what they have)

Louis C.K. - 4(As basically Zero Mostel in The Front he's moving in portraying the slow deterioration of his character as he portrays an earnest passion that he shows gradually wains as he cannot find solace. In addition he finds the right tone for his performance as he has edges of sardonic humor yet he never allows this to overwhelm his character, still keeping the poignancy well intact)

Goodman - 3.5(Felt a little bit like he ran out of Coen Brothers film. Goodman is enjoyable in portraying basically a more supportive version of Mike Starr's character in Ed Wood. He's makes him the crass shlockmeister he should be. He's also a bit fun in his few asides with Stephen Root, whose also fun as his meeker brother.)

Elliot - 1.5(Felt his performance to be a weak John Wayne imitation but worse than that his whole performance is controlled by that imitation. Never felt like more than just an act that would be more fitting in a comedy sketch.)

O'Gorman - 1.5(Same as Elliot really except its a Kirk Douglas imitation)

Berkel - 3(Felt his Otto Preminger imitation was a bit better, but it was probably helped by the fact that his character was only really there to be funny, which luckily he was)

Stuhlbarg - 3.5(He really does not bother to imitate Edward G. Robinson at all, which is probably the better idea since he actually does not seem like simply a parody. Stuhlbarg instead tries to find just sort of the essence of his style, and the emotional truth of how he is as a character. This is not Martin Landau in Ed Wood mind you, but Stuhlbarg manages to make his portrayal of Robinson's struggle rather affecting. Though it should be noted that the film unfairly treats Robinson.)

Anonymous:

No I have not.

Michael McCarthy said...

Am I the only one who isn't a huge fan of Catch Me If You Can? Like I think Leo is good in it but the story just feels so sloppy and uneven to me that I could never call it a great performance.

Michael McCarthy said...

Also I very much agree with Louis's thoughts on the film, particularly with C.K. and Stuhlbarg. I hated what they did with Robinson.

Calvin Law said...

Trumbo ratings:

Cranston (4)
Mirren (4)
Lane (3)
Fanning (3)
Louis C.K. (4)
Goodman (3.5)
Elliot (1.5)
O'Gorman (2.5)
Berkel (3.5)
Stuhlbarg (3.5)

I actually enjoyed the film a great deal. It's no masterpiece that's for sure, but I found it an intriguing enough look into that particular period of time in Hollywood. In terms of just being a biopic I thought it was actually more enjoyable than Steve Jobs overall. Roach's direction is definitely not on the level of Boyle's but I thought McNamara's screenplay was rather good, the supporting cast was consistently entertaining (with Berkel being particularly hilarious, Stuhlbarg being quietly moving although I agree with Robinson being treated unfairly, and my personal favourite of the 'real life' supporting cast Mirren was just plain entertaining).

Louis C.K. was a revelation, I've been really impressed in all the movie roles I've seen him in so far. As for Cranston I thought he was rather good, and in fact a re-watch could bump him up. He had a couple moments of overacting and that 'mouth agape' look he gives sometimes is a bit grating, but overall I thought he was a very engaging lead, far better than Fassbender in Jobs at compelling the audience to follow his journey. I will not mind if he gets nominated so long as it's not at the expense of Damon, and even then I won't blame him because there's Fassbender's undeserving nomination, and also presumably Redmayne (ugh need to check that out soon).

Calvin Law said...

Also I thought Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje was rather good as the prison guard and would give him a 3.

Anonymous said...

Louis: You said that one of your dream movie pairings would be John Wayne/Clint Eastwood. What would the plot be like to you?

Anonymous said...

John Smith: Hi amigos!

Just watched two movies.

The Force Awakens:
Ridley: 5 (Mvp)
Boyega: 5
Driver: 4.5
Fisher: 3
Ford: 4
Oscar Isaac: 4
Gleeson: 4

Legend:
Hardy: 5
Thelwis: 3.5
Browning: 1 or 1.5 (Being generous here)



Luke Higham said...

Trumbo
Cranston - 4
Mirren - 3.5
Louis C.K. - 4
Stuhlbarg - 3.5
Lane - 3
Fanning - 3
Goodman - 3
I liked it well enough.

Anonymous said...

Also watched Trumbo as well.
Cranston: 4
Mirren: 3,5/4
Lane: 3
Fanning: 3
Louis C.K.: 4
Goodman: 3,5
Elliot: 1,5
O'Gorman: 2
Berkel: 3
Stuhlbarg: 3,5
I found it watchable.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on The Hateful Eight and your ratings & thoughts on the cast.

Best Possible Lead Actor Nominees
Cranston
Damon
Depp
DiCaprio
Jordan
As everyone knows, I've no problem with Fassbender getting nominated for Steve Jobs, which is very likely at this point, (I found the third act very problematic and didn't think he managed to overcome it. Despite that, I still think it's a good performance from him) though I wish he was getting a lot more recognition for Macbeth.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Are you really that confident that Jordan will get a nomination?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I think he has a slight chance and I've ruled out McKellen completely.

I'm judging the contenders based on quality.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: No Category Frauds.
Supporting Actor:
Rylance
Elba
Stallone
Hardy
Keaton

Lead Actress:
Larson
Ronan
Blanchett
Rampling
Tomlin

Supporting Actress:
Leigh
Winslet
McAdams
Banks
Vikander (Ex Machina)

Anonymous said...

Luke: Have you updated your predictions on who's gonna win the Oscars?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Picture: Spotlight
Director: Scott (A Three-Way race between Scott, Haynes and McCarthy)
Actor: DiCaprio
Actress: Larson
Supporting Actor: Rylance
Supporting Actress: Mara

Anonymous said...

Luke: I would be glad to see Scott finally win. :)

Michael McCarthy said...

If Mad Max gets a Best Pic nomination (which it probably will) I could totally see Miller getting Best Director.

Luke Higham said...

Michael McCarthy: I want Miller to win and think he has a good chance, though the other 3 are more likely to take the gold.

Anonymous said...

Michael: I don't see Mad Max getting nominated for Best Picture, but I could see Miller getting a nomination for Best Director and probably some nominations in the technical department.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Your Acting winners for 2015.

Calvin: My Supporting Actress winner is Vikander in Ex Machina.

Anonymous said...

Luke:
Lead Actor: DiCaprio (McKellen's 2#)
Lead Actress: Ronan
Supporting Actor: Rylance
Supporting Actress: Leigh

Anonymous said...

Luke: Oops, my mistake, my Supporting Actress winner is also Vikander in Ex Machina, not Leigh.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Saw Joy. Don't get the hate.

Anonymous said...

Robert: You liked the movie?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mostly. The family stuff was redundant Russell territory, but the business stuff and subtext about Capitalism hit home.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Nolan's next project 'Dunkirk'.

It's rumoured to star Hardy, Branagh and Rylance. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: Nolan, Hardy, Branagh and Rylance? Sounds very interesting.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I already know my top 2 anticipated films for 2017, this and The Snowman (Tomas Alfredson 'Let The Right One In & Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy'/Michael Fassbender). I hope PTA's next project comes by then as well.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'm relieved that he's not doing Akira or any other Sci-Fi film for that matter.

Luke Higham said...

*Nolan

Robert MacFarlane said...

The Academy wouldn't play by Nolan's rules, now he'll play by theirs.

Michael McCarthy said...

I can say with no hesitation that my most anticipated film of 2017 is Three Billboards.

Calvin Law said...

I will be so, so very pleased if Jordan gets nominated and upsets one of the 'certain' trio of Fassbender, Redmayne (who I've seen now) and DiCaprio as I feel like he gave an amazing performance. I am seriously considering moving him into my top 5 but I can't quite move Fassbender in Macbeth out, because he was great too.

Dream Lead Actor lineup (fantasy):
McKellen
Damon
Segel
Hardy
Fassbender in Macbeth/Jordan

More realistic dream lineup:
Damon
Depp
DiCaprio
Jordan
Cranston

Also Redmayne wasn't bad at all but a bit underwhelming. Vikander was fantastic though. I also quite liked Schoenaerts. Hopper's direction was very mediocre. Whishaw was quite poor actually.

Calvin Law said...

Also Haynes needs to win. Miller, Scott, and McCarthy all directed their films beautifully and I don't want to begrudge Scott a hugely deserving career win but Haynes' work in Carol is just some of the best direction, ever.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: What about the other three acting categories. (Fantasy and Realistically)

Luke Higham said...

R.I.P. Lemmy

Anonymous said...

John Smith

The Limey:

Terrence Stamp: 5

Luiz Guzman: 4.5-5

Fonda: 5.6

Calvin Law said...

Actress (fantasy)
Mara
Blanchett
Blunt
Larson/Mulligan

Realistic
Mara (I still think there's a chance to avoid fraud)
Blanchett
Larson
Ronan
? (need to see Joy first)

Supporting Actor
Stallone
Elba
Rylance
Del Toro
Hardy

Stallone
Elba
Rylance
Hardy
Tremblay (fraud I know but hey if it gets him in)

Need to think about S. Actress

R.I.P Lemmy


Luke Higham said...

Calvin: If you've seen Room, can I have your ratings & thoughts on Larson and Tremblay.

Anonymous said...

R.I.P. Lemmy

Anonymous said...

John Smith: I just watched 'Come And See'. It left me kind off emotionally crushed so i give 100 out of 10.

Entire Cast: 5/5

It contains the two greatest child performances ever by Aleksey Kravchenko and Olga Mironova

Luke Higham said...

John: I'm glad you liked it. :) It's quite the memorable experience.

Anonymous said...

Luke: It was memorable indeed. I can't say i like it, but i love the fact that it exists and i admire what it managed to convey. War can sometimes feel accelerating and this movie made me kind of envy the dead. I hope Louis does a bonus review for Aleksey in the future. I really like Private Ryan, Schindler's List, The Pianist, The Thin Red Line but in terms of immersion and realism the winner without a doubt is 'Come And See'.

Anonymous said...

The next movie on my watch list is 'The Deer Hunter', but i should propably wait till tomorrow until i watch another traumatic war movie.

Anonymous said...

John Smith:
The next movie on my watch list is 'The Deer Hunter', but i should propably wait till tomorrow until i watch another traumatic war movie.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

In regards to Nolan's next project it sounds interesting, including that cast, and I am curious to see him move possibly out of the certain zone he's been working in. I hope maybe it will reduce the excesses that made his last two films problematic.

I'm afraid I must sleep, but before I do.

Suffragette which had many problems but its leading performance was not one of them:

Mulligan - 4.5
Gleeson - 3.5
Basically everyone else - 2.5

The Hateful Eight which I loved (outside of one fairly minor thing) and is my #2 of the year.

Need to think things through but right now I'll just give you:

Leigh - 5(My Win)
Bichir - 3.5
Madsen - 3.5
Parks - 3
The Other - 3
Tarantino - 0(His narration is the minor thing)

Calvin Law said...

Interesting, judging by the reception I was definitely not expecting so enthusiastic a response. I am guessing:

Jackson: 5
Goggins: 5
Russell: 4.5
Roth: 4/4.5
Dern: 3.5/4

Anonymous said...

Louis: Would Carol be in your top 10 movies for 2015? Because it's probably my first.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I'm so pleased you liked Mulligan and loved Leigh. :)

Your thoughts on Mulligan, Gleeson and Those from The Hateful Eight Cast, that you've given your ratings to.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: More detailed thoughts on Suffragette and The Hateful Eight.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin:
Jackson - 5
Goggins - 5
Russell - 4/4.5
Roth - 4
Dern - 4

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'm gonna give Concussion a miss, though I'll be watching Diary Of A Teenage Girl, sometime tonight.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I saw Creed.
Jordan: 4,5
Stallone: 4,5

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Realistically, who do you hope gets nominated.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: For all 4 acting categories.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I'm probably the only one here who wants Stallone to beat Rylance.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Realistically?
Lead Actor
DiCaprio
Fassbender
Depp
Damon
Cranston

Supporting Actor
Rylance
Elba
Del Toro
Stallone
Hardy
Keaton could get in...

Lead Actress
Blanchett
Larson
Ronan
Mara
Lawrence

Supporting Actress
Leigh
McAdams
Winslet
Allen
Vikander

Anonymous said...

Luke: In my fantasy...
Lead Actor
DiCaprio
Fassbender (Macbeth)
McKellen
Depp
Damon

Supporting Actor
Rylance
Keaton
Hardy
Elba
Del Toro/Goggins

Lead Actress
Blanchett
Larson
Ronan
Mara
Rampling

Supporting Actress
Leigh
McAdams
Winslet
Allen
Vikander (Ex-Machina)

Luke Higham said...

Robert: If Stallone wins, I'll be pleased as much as you, even if Rylance is my preference. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: I'd be pleased if anyone of the Supporting nominees won.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'd be happy with the other contenders as well. :) Supporting's been absolutely extraordinary this year.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Time flies fast, doesn't it? Soon we'll be in 2016.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: The only films from 2015, that I'm still needing to watch are:
Macbeth
Son Of Saul
Anomalisa
The Diary Of A Teenage Girl
45 Years
Grandma

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: 300 Comments. :)
Your most anticipated films for 2016. (Updated)

Anonymous said...

Luke: I already told you that my most antecipated films are Silence and Hail, Caesar.

Anonymous said...

*anticipated

Anonymous said...

Luke: I'm also anticipating X-Men: Apocalypse and Deadpool.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: What are your hopes for Silence, Hail, Caesar!, X-Men: Apocalypse, Deadpool and Rogue One.

Anonymous said...

Luke:...oh, and The BFG.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: And The BFG.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I hope that they are great movies. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: And that Nolan project with Hardy, Rylance and Branagh is probably my most anticipated project of 2017.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: My hopes are:
1. Garfield, Neeson and Clooney give 5 star performances.
2. Isaac giving a great villainous turn as Apocalypse and Fassbender gives his best performance as Magneto.
3. Deadpool lives up to the hype.
4. Disney, not giving Rogue One the Marvel treatment.
5. Rylance being terrific as always.

Luke Higham said...

Louis & Everyone else: What are your hopes for 2016.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I just finished watching Macbeth.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Most Anticipated films for 2017. (I'll not being mentioning it again for another year, but would like to give the list now)

Dunkirk
The Snowman
Star Wars: Episode VIII
Alien: Covenant
Three Billboards

Least Anticipated - Avatar II

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Ratings for the cast. Did you watch it online or in theaters.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Watched it online. Anyway, it is a very good adaptation. It has this gritty atmosphere that makes it very worth watching, due to the cinematography and art direction.

Ratings:
Fassbender: 5
Cotillard: 5
Harris: 3,5
Considine: 4
Reynor: 3
Debicki: 3
Thewlis: 3,5/4

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Please give me a link. Thoughts on Fassbender & Cotillard.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Can't remember the site where I watched (sorry about that) it, but here's my thoughts.
Fassbender: His best performance of the year for sure. It's great as Mifune's performance in Throne of Blood, although it's a very different take on Macbeth.
Cotillard: One of the best performances of Lady Macbeth. She is properly caring and loving in a convincing way but is manipulating in a great way that no one notices her.
Overall, they have amazing chemistry.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I swear to god, I'm gonna be livid if it doesn't turn up on Putlocker within the next 7 days.

Anonymous said...

Luke: All I can say is that Larry and Viv would be proud of their performances. :)

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'm sure they will. :)

Looks like, I'm gonna be right on my Fives prediction for Supporting Actress. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: I don't know, but I think Louis will post his next review (probably Mitchum) in the first day of 2016.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I hope it's a bit sooner, because we'll have to keep our comments to a minimum by then.

I can't wait for his New Year Predictions. Look forward to seeing which pictures he'll be using for the contenders/reviews.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I'd like him to post it today.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Me too. :)

Anonymous said...

Luke: Actually, I only watched Man of the West after I requested a bonus review.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I've done it a few times myself. :) I initially requested Kravchenko, before seeing Come And See, then changed it to Massoud.

Anonymous said...

Luke: I'd say that Douglas, Lancaster, Mitchum and Holden would have done better in the role than Cooper.

Anonymous said...

*also say

Anonymous said...

Luke: For his bonus reviews of mini-series, I would like to see Louis review Robert Duvall in Lonesome Dove.

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Rylance, Lewis, Pryce and Lesser in Wolf Hall
Whishaw, Irons, Hiddleston and Simon Russell Beale in The Hollow Crown
Giamatti, Wilkinson and Dillane in John Adams
Irons and Dancy in Elizabeth I
Irons, Andrews and Olivier in Brideshead Revisited
Lewis, Livingston and others in Band Of Brothers
Oscar Isaac in Show Me A Hero
Edgar Ramirez in Carlos
Tim Curry in It
Thornton and Freeman in Fargo
McConaughey and Harrelson in True Detective

Anonymous said...

Luke: What are your rating predictions for all of those performances you listed?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
Wolf Hall/Rylance - 5/Lewis - 4.5/Pryce - 4.5/Lesser - 4/4.5
Hollow Crown/Whishaw - 5/Irons - Henry IV Pt I - 4.5, Pt II - 4.5/5/Hiddleston - Pt I - 4/4.5, Pt II - 4.5, Henry V - 4.5/5/Beale - Pt I - 4.5, Pt II - 4.5/5
John Adams/Giamatti - 5/Wilkinson - 4/Dillane - 4
Elizabeth I/Irons - 4.5/Dancy - 4
Brideshead Revisited/Irons - 4.5/5/Andrews - 4.5/Olivier - 4/4.5
Band Of Brothers/Lewis - 4.5/Livingston - 4/4.5
Isaac - 5
Ramirez - 4.5/5
Curry - 5
Thornton - 4.5/5
Freeman - 4.5/5
McConaughey - 5
Harrelson - 5

Calvin Law said...

Robert: You're not alone. Stallone is my win for the year.

Also Andrews will probably get a 5 for Brideshead.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have you thought about doing those Mini-Series/TV Film reviews concurrently with the bonus rounds. I ask this, because I really want a Rylance/Wolf Hall review sooner rather than later.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: I only ever saw the first episode of Brideshead, though since you think Andrews might get a 5, I'm interested in getting back to it again.

I saw The Hobbit: The Battle Of The Five Armies Extended Edition and it's a slight improvement.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Yes it would be.

Luke:

Suffragette as a film fails to really find any direction in its depiction of its story, as well as just does not have a clear view of what exactly it is trying to aim for. It jumps around too much for its own good trying to come up with random bits of character for the other suffragettes but unfortunately they seem more haphazard than anything else. This is particularly true in regards to the use of Emily Davison, who the film probably should have given a stricter focus, since her actions at the end were meant to serve as the climax. The way the film uses her though makes her actions seem random, and lacks the power that seems would be inherent from the story. The film’s whole aesthetic also is harmful as the insistent shaky cam is only a distraction, does anyone really think it creates realism? There’s more wrong with the film which I will get to in a moment.

Mulligan – (Mulligan is the one who keeps the film from being a complete failure. What’s remarkable about Mulligan’s work is the film actually does not give her that much to work with. As her character is basically given a set of points to meet to basically be every suffragette in one woman. Mulligan never makes this whole approach feel disjointed though as she so effectively captures each side, and is able to emotionally find the character’s transitions no matter how swift they may be. She finds the right curiosity timid quality at first then transition to a certain maturation of the spirit, while capturing the fear of the reprisals by the law. Mulligan final step to that of an unshakable passion is well earned, and Mulligan never loses her character despite the film offering little help for her. Also when the film goes extremely melodramatic, such as the adoption scene, Mulligan is so good that she stops the film from going off the rails in these moments. Her so genuine work manages to make such a moment moving, even if the manipulation in terms of the script is far too excessive. I would have loved to see what she could have done with stronger material, but Mulligan deserves a great deal of credit for never faltering despite the film’s weaknesses)

Gleeson – 3.5(Gleeson makes the most out of his part by refusing to ever play him as a villain. There are plenty chances were his lines could have easily been eschewed as a pompous hatred, but Gleeson refuses the simplification with his performance. Gleeson offers an actual man who obviously knows and understands the situation, though still makes his stance for the law a considerable threat without needing to act as the devil. Instead Gleeson honestly depicts man doing his job, which entails cruelty, that he takes no pleasure in yet in no way will yield his position)

Louis Morgan said...

Again I loved the Hateful Eight far more than I even expected to. I found every moment of it gripping and was particularly surprised by how well it was paced given its length and the nature of the story. Tarantino deserves a great deal of credit as director here as he makes the blizzard a force all in its own, and the atmosphere of the isolation created by it is palatable. Perhaps as remarkable is how energetic and lively he keeps the film all while being enclosed into a single work. He makes the most of that one location, as well as so effectively builds that gradual tension that he does not lose until the fantastic final scene. And of course as usual he deserves credit as a writer. One might make the charge that more time could be given to some of the Eight but I feel he finds a right balance that even those with less focus are compelling within the limits we see them in. The film is very funny, with some juvenile moments of course, but I found the story in general far more mature than Django Unchained while still fitting in a similar “exploitation” style. There is an emotional core to the work that ends up making the film quite affecting even with some of the explosive bloodshed found within it. The technical aspects must be praised particularly the costumes, which give so much character all on their own, and of course that score by Morricone. What can I say other than once again that I loved it, almost every minute of it, again except for that one thing.

Leigh – (Though she won’t win since she plays a crude villain instead of a suave one, she deserves to since first of all she’s actually supporting but also because she’s amazing. Leigh knows exactly how to stand out in the ensemble as she is so lively just in the margins in the early scenes it is remarkable. She successfully is a joy to watch as there is so much energy to her work yet she never appears to be vying for undue intention she simply earns it. There’s not a wasted reaction of hers, she adds to every scene she’s even in the background of. Now that’s just the half of it really as I also love how she crafted Daisy’s devious personality. I like how on the surface she essentially played her as the dumb stereotype of a racist wild woman, yet within her laughs and uncouth remarks Leigh finds this truly incisive quality in her venom, suggesting that it’s a bit more calculated than the behavior of a simple lout. Leigh’s excellent in the way though that she just as easily seems wholly disarming when Daisy calms down as though, she seems just like a slightly curious woman, nothing more. When Daisy takes action Leigh is great in revealing the true psychotic madness of Daisy, as Leigh portrays Daisy as relishes every moment of the chaos she creates.)

Louis Morgan said...

Bichir - (Quite liked his oddball work as everything he said was masked in a scrapie gasp, and he was so good at being so obviously shady to the point that you know he’s guilty of something it is just a matter of finding out what exactly.)

Madsen - (As long as Madsen tries in a role like this, he’s good and with Tarantino he tries. He fits like glove as the apparent standard thug, and it’s completely fine work.)

Parks – (He offers fine support as the most straight forward character in the film. He’s good by not being particularly notable so to speak.)

The Other – (He’s good making enough of an impact though I can’t help but ponder if another actor could have done even more.)

Tarantino – (The narration really was not needed. The second time you could take it away as is, and the first time would probably only need some slight adjustments. It does not help that Tarantino delivers in a way that one might think they turned on the audio commentary in the theater.)

Dern – 4.5(I’ll admit I loved the whole presentation of the character to begin with but Dern does not coast on that. He finds a terrific balance in his performance as he delivers the mean bile deep in the man’s bone. You can sense his defeat in the war in his very being. What’s great though is that Dern does not leave him as just a racist general caricature. Dern brings a real depth to the somber place of his character is in, and is actually quite moving when he reveals the simpler sadness of man having lost everything. He’s particularly strong in his final scene as he brings so much in just his silent reaction)

Roth – 4(A very entertaining performance to be sure as he is doing his best Christoph Waltz imitation. Roth though makes it feel completely natural to his character, but also he’s just a whole lot of fun to watch perform here.)

And for fun:

The Hateful Eight 70’s directed by Sergio Leone:

Major Warren – Woody Strode
John Ruth – John Wayne
Daisy – Shelley Winters
Mannix – Bruce Dern
Bob – Mario Brega
Oswaldo Mobray – Peter Ustinov
Joe Gage – Jack Elam
General Smithers – Walter Brennan

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Can you review Goggins, Jackson and Russell all at once, just so there's review slots open for other performances like Isaac's or Tucci's.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Certainly.

Matt Mustin said...

Is everybody supporting in Hateful Eight, or is there a lead?

Luke Higham said...

Matt Mustin: The closest to being argued as Lead is Jackson, but since it's an ensemble piece, he's supporting for me.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

All supporting, though Jackson could be argued as lead.

Luke Higham said...

Updated Supporting Predictions
Nominees:
Rylance
Stallone
Elba
Shannon
Keaton

Alternate:
Hardy
Del Toro
Jenkins
Hoult
Cohen
Goggins/Jackson/Russell
Tucci/Schreiber
Isaac
Driver
Schoenaerts/Sheen

Matt Mustin said...

Louis, did you see The Hateful Eight in 70mm?

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

Yes.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Who would be your choice for Bruce Wayne/Batman in a version of The Dark Knight in the 50's?

Calvin Law said...

Love that Hateful Eight 70's cast.

Luke: I have seen Room now.

Larson: 5 (wonderfully poignant work that's just so filled with warmth. She still wouldn't make my top 5 but that's more due to the strength of Mara, Ronan, Blanchett, Mulligan and Blunt more than anything Larson does wrong. It will be a very, very worthy win.)

Tremblay: 5 (supporting will be THE biggest category fraud ever. Having said that I won't mind that much if he gets nominated, especially if it's ahead of Shannon who is definitely supporting, but who is also definitely not particularly impressive. Rylance, Elba, Stallone, Hardy/Keaton, and Tremblay would be a splendid 5 even if Tremblay is definitely lead. Anyway enough about that. The performance. Tremblay doesn't show a hint of inexperience in carrying the film. He is just so realistic in first presenting this portrayal of pure innocence and then as experience overwhelms him, is just so realistically moving. A perfect Blake-ian performance in that sense as he moulds Innocence and Experience into one hell of a song)

Calvin Law said...

Also Tremblay would be my tied 6th for lead, with Michael B. Jordan in Creed. Either of them could overtake Fassbender at some point although I'd hate to knock Fassy out considering the lack of love I've shown him over the years.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: Might be a bit premature but as it stands, what are your top 10 films (don't have to be in order) of the year.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

Obviously I have some I still need to see, Macbeth and The Revenant in particular. As it stands in alphabetical order:

Bone Tomahawk
Bridge of Spies
Brooklyn
Carol
The End of the Tour
The Hateful Eight
Mad Max: Fury Road
Sicario
Spotlight
Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Calvin Law said...

Damn surprised to see The Martian's dropped!But pleasantly surprised to see The End of the Tour and Sicario on the list (bodes well for Del Toro's review).

Is Blunt still a 4.5? Not trying to sway you at all but a recent re-watch of the film showed me a LOT I'd missed first time round from her.

Louis Morgan said...

The Martian did not have that much of a lasting impact for me, not that I dislike it now, it would still be in my top 20 after all.

Blunt is still the same at the moment, but I haven't re-watched the film.

Calvin Law said...

Hopefully Carol and Brooklyn will continue to have a lasting impact on you. Would particularly recommend re-watching Carol if you feel any urge to as that's what I did. Three times.

Really need to check out Bone Tomahawk.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Anomalisa and The Big Short are on Putlocker.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: I'm kind of hoping, that Tremblay does get nominated in Supporting, because it will free up a spot for Alternate Lead and Keaton's probably gonna be reviewed alongside Tucci and Schreiber in one post, if that were to be the case.

I hope Rylance, Stallone and Elba do make it in, so that everyone I've listed in my supporting predictions will get reviewed.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Don't forget Son Of Saul. :)

If you can't review Rohrig, by the time you finish alternate lead, could you move on to supporting and come back to him, whenever you do see him.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin & Anonymous: My Top 3 Child Performances of 2015.
1. Abraham Attah/Beasts Of No Nation (5)
2. Jacob Tremblay/Room (5)
3. Milo Parker/Mr. Holmes (3.5/4)

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 358 of 358   Newer› Newest»