Wednesday, 8 February 2017

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2016

And the Nominees Were Not:

Stellan Skarsgård in Our Kind of Traitor

Damian Lewis in Our Kind of Traitor 

Sam Neill in Hunt For the Wilderpeople

Ben Foster in Hell or High Water

Alden Ehrenreich in Hail Caesar!

Ralph Ineson in The Witch 

Harvey Scrimshaw in The Witch

For Prediction purposes:

Skarsgård from Traitor

Ineson from the VVitch

 And they also were not:

Shinya Tsukamoto in Silence

Yoshi Oida in Silence 

Tadanobu Asano in Silence

Liam Neeson in Silence 

Issey Ogata in Silence

Yosuke Kubozuka in Silence

For prediction purposes:
 

Tsukamoto out of the villagers.  

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Results

5. Adam Driver in Paterson - I approach the keyboard to write the results of the year. I ponder if I chose Driver because he's the only actor from Silence I left off on the supporting shortlist. I continue to think and realize that this is a performance worth writing about.
4. Michael Keaton in The Founder - Keaton gives an entertaining performance as Ray Kroc but also manages to take his film to the darker places it needs to go in his revelation of the true nature of a cutthroat businessman.

Best Scene: Bathroom meeting.
3. Chris Pine in Hell or High - Chris Pine has an unassuming role yet gives a powerful portrayal of his character's motivations without being overshadowed by his more colorful co-stars.

Best Scene: Final scene.
2. Joel Edgerton in Loving - Edgerton gives a brilliant understated performance internalizing so effectively both the character's turmoil due to his hardship but also the love for his wife.

Best Scene: First meeting with Cohen.
1. Andrew Garfield in Silence - Good Predictions Calvin Law, and Robert MacFarlane. Due to only having five slots this may seem a weaker year, but that's in large pat because the Academy really did their job this year. It was a strong year for lead actor with Andrew Garfield giving the crowning achievement. He gives the most powerful performance of the year. It is an emotionally devastating performance to watch, but so much more in his profound realization of his character's unique journey of faith.

Best Scene: Garupe's test.
Overall Rank:
  1. Andrew Garfield in Silence
  2. Jeff Bridges in Hell or High Water
  3. Viggo Mortensen in Captain Fantastic
  4. Joel Edgerton in Loving
  5. Denzel Washington in Fences
  6. Shahab Hosseini in The Salesman
  7. Hiroshi Abe in After the Storm
  8. Andrew Garfield in Hacksaw Ridge
  9. Chris Pine in Hell or High Water
  10. Casey Affleck in Manchester by the Sea
  11. Ryan Gosling in La La Land
  12. Michael Keaton in The Founder 
  13. Adam Driver in Paterson
  14. Song Kang-ho in The Age of Shadows
  15. Tom Hanks in Sully
  16. Russell Crowe in The Nice Guys
  17. Ryan Gosling in The Nice Guys
  18. Robert Downey Jr. Captain America: Civil War 
  19. Ryan Reynolds in Deadpool 
  20. Trevante Rhodes in Moonlight
  21. Ethan Hawke in Born to Be Blue
  22. Luke Treadaway in A Street Cat Named Bob
  23. Adrian Titieni in Graduation
  24. Jarkko Lahti in The Happiest Day in the Life of Olli Mäki 
  25. Julian Dennison in Hunt for the Wilderpeople
  26. Lewis MacDougall in A Monster Calls 
  27. Ashton Sanders in Moonlight 
  28. Anton Yelchin in Green Room
  29. Nate Parker in Birth of a Nation
  30. Don Cheadle in Miles Ahead 
  31. Nawazuddin Siddiqui in Raman Raghav
  32. Jesse Plemons in Other People
  33. Daniel Radcliffe in Swiss Army Man
  34. Paul Dano in Swiss Army Man
  35. Oscar Martínez in The Distinguished Citizen
  36. Benedict Cumberbatch in Dr. Strange 
  37. Jake Gyllenhaal in Demolition
  38. Chris Evans in Captain America: Civil War 
  39. Jeremy Irons in The Man Who Knew Infinity
  40. Jonah Hill in War Dogs
  41. David Oyelowo in A United Kingdom
  42. Dan Fogler in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
  43. Jim Broadbent in Ethel & Ernest
  44. Bryan Cranston in The Infiltrator
  45. Hugh Grant in Florence Foster Jenkins
  46. Cillian Murphy in Anthropoid
  47. Mark Rylance in The BFG
  48. Dave Johns in I, Daniel Blake
  49. Michael Fassbender in The Light Between Oceans
  50. Sunny Pawar in Lion
  51. Dev Patel in Lion
  52. Gong Yoo in Train to Busan
  53. Mel Gibson in Blood Father 
  54. Josh Brolin in Hail Caesar! 
  55. Gong Yoo in The Age of Shadows
  56. Taron Egerton in Eddie The Eagle
  57. Joe Alwyn in Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk
  58. Eddie Redmayne in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 
  59. Miles Teller in Bleed For This
  60. David Oyelowo in The Queen of Katwe
  61. Diego Luna in Rogue One
  62. Dwayne Johnson in Moana
  63. Paddy Considine in The Girl With All The Gifts
  64. Ferdia Walsh-Peelo in Sing Street 
  65. Alex Hibbert in Moonlight 
  66. Joe Seo in Spa Night
  67. Jean-Pierre Léaud in The Death of Louis XIV
  68. Matthew McConaughey in Free State of Jones
  69. Michael Shannon in Elvis & Nixon
  70. Vicky Kaushal in Raman Raghav 2.0
  71. Joseph Gordon-Levitt in Snowden
  72. Denzel Washington in The Magnificent Seven 
  73. Mark Wahlberg in Patriots Day 
  74. Majd Mastoura in Hedi
  75. Casey Affleck in The Finest Hours
  76. Jason Bateman in Zootopia
  77. Ben Affleck in The Accountant
  78. Stephen Lang in Don't Breathe
  79. Markees Christmas in Morris From America
  80. Miles Teller in War Dogs
  81. Michael Shannon in Midnight Special
  82. Blake Jenner in Everybody Wants Some
  83. Peter Simonischek in Toni Erdmann 
  84. Matthew McConaughey in Gold
  85. Keegan-Michael Key in Keanu 
  86. Mark Duplass in Blue Jay
  87. Lucas Jade Zumann in 20th Century Women
  88. Chris Pine in Star Trek: Beyond
  89. Ben Affleck in Live by Night 
  90. John Krasinski in 13 Hours
  91. Casey Affleck in Triple Nine 
  92. James Badge Dale in 13 Hours
  93. Mark Wahlberg in Deepwater Horizon 
  94. Jamie Dornan in Anthropoid 
  95. Jack Black in Kung Fu Panda 3
  96. Art Parkinson in Kubo and the Two Strings
  97. Jordan Peele in Keanu 
  98. Ulrich Thomsen in The Commune
  99. Dev Patel in The Man Who Knew Infinity
  100. Mungau Dain in Tanna
  101. Oakes Fegley in Pete's Dragon
  102. Ben Affleck in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
  103. Jesse Eisenberg in Cafe Society
  104. Kwak Do-won in The Wailing
  105. Max Records in I am Not a Serial Killer
  106. Ewan McGregor in Our Kind of Traitor
  107. Chris Pratt in Passengers 
  108. Jaeden Lieberher in Midnight Special 
  109. Logan Lerman in Indignation
  110. Chris Pine in The Finest Hours
  111. Neel Sethi in The Jungle Book
  112. Henry Cavill in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
  113. Brad Pitt in Allied
  114. Eddie Murphy in Mr. Church
  115. Jake Gyllenhaal in Nocturnal Animals
  116. Will Smith in Collateral Beauty

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Andrew Garfield in Silence

Andrew Garfield did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Father Sebastião Rodrigues in Silence.

Silence is a masterful film about two Jesuit priests who travel to Japan to attempt to spread Christianity and discover the fate of their mentor.

Andrew Garfield was unable to be nominated for his performance in this film since he was already nominated for Hacksaw Ridge. Both films have at the very least portions that take place in Japan and Christianity plays a large role in terms of the motivations of each man he portrays. In Hacksaw Ridge though we are given a man whose faith is an unquestionable facet, and his story is more about conviction to those firm beliefs. In Silence the focus is more closely on the faith itself. We are introduced to the Catholic Father Rodrigues, as he and Father Garupe (Adam Driver), as they learn that their former mentor, Father Ferreira (Liam Neeson), has apparently surrendered his mission in Japan, and denounced God. The two decide to go to Japan themselves in order reestablish Christianity within the country and find out the truth in regards to Ferreira. Prior to 2015, Andrew Garfield was an actor whose performances I found myself strangely detached to yet with each new performance I've found him to be an actor with such an eloquent understanding for tone and character. Garfield here embodies the man that is Rodrigues, I do not mean he merely provides a consistent accent, which he does, but that is only a minor facet of this process.

Garfield's work is that of more than one would ever assume. In the opening moments Garfield expresses the devotion of a faithful priest in the service of God. He speaks of his support for the mission to discover their lost mentor, and for the support of Catholicism itself. There is no simplicity in this conviction, as truthful as it is, through Garfield's work. Throughout the film we hear Rodrigues's narration and his thoughts. These moments are not to be forgotten and are not a footnote to this performance. Garfield speaks of the "vision" of Christ's portrait by El Greco, it is a calm astute belief not zealotry. We hear the years of a devotion to God, that is defined by comfort not an overt passion. In order to travel to Japan they find a guide in an alcoholic Japanese Fisherman in Macau by the name of Kichijiro (Yosuke Kubozuka), Rodrigues watches the man whose wretched nature seems obvious, yet in this early on Garfield provides only an understanding and empathy in the eyes of Rodrigues for a man who appears to be "the least of his brothers". Garfield offers no judgment in Rodrigues towards this man, only an open heart, as his very physical manner is that of welcoming guide for anyone who may be lost.

The priests successfully reach Japan and discover two villages filled with loyal Christians who are more than appreciative to be granted two new priests to help practice their faith once more. These scenes have an incredible, subtle, beauty to them by revealing how genuine the solace the villagers are granted through their interactions with the priests. In Garfield's own physical and verbal interactions there is only a warmth, a real honesty in his strive to support the Japanese Christians. Garfield's work is remarkable by creating such a lack vanity in his portrayal of Rodrigues's own reflections upon this experience. The joy expressed is a powerful understated quality in Garfield portrayal where Rodrigues's own faith seems only to be rewarded, by that solace the peasants feel by his mere presence. There is a specific lack of indulgence within this though as Garfield expresses an equal understanding of the hardship of their lives. During this time Rodrigues is also made aware of Kichijiro's own tragic story, where his whole family was slaughtered and only he survived by renouncing God. Rodrigues acceptance of this confession, is made earnest in Garfield's performance which reflects a wish to offer comfort yet once again has empathy for his terrible suffering.

Eventually this pleasant time is ended when the Japanese inquisition visits the town in order to find the priests and purge the Christians from the land. They choose hostages to pay for these "crimes". Rodrigues advises the hostages to trample on the Fumie (image of Christ). Garfield speaks the words "Trample, trample" not lightly. It is with a pained conviction that Garfield gives, presenting the attempt in Rodrigues to allow the men to live, assuage their conscience even while he struggles with his own by giving this instruction. The hostages, except one, Kichijiro, fail to apostatize to the inquisitor's satisfaction, leaving them to be slowly executed by being placed on wooden crosses within the ocean. Rodrigues and Garupe can but watch at a distance as it unfolds in front of them. Garfield's work is very poignant in the sequence as it is more than even reflecting the distress of witnessing the men's slow death. Although that is shown there is even more as the initial conviction of the man begins to waver. Garfield conveys the confusion of this development as he attempts to ponder the suffering with an ever loving God. At the end of the execution Garfield has shown Rodrigues own loss of certainty through only his soft narration and scarce reactions.

Rodrigues and Garupe separate for their safety leaving Rodrigues to trek alone in an attempt to continue the mission. Garfield is exceptional in revealing the difficult state Rodrigues is in, experiencing almost his own Gethsemane as he wanders attempting to find direction. Garfield reveals a madness of this as Rodrigues grapples with now a palatable doubt. Garfield presents a harrowing vision into Rodrigues's mind as a man who is truly lost, finding his only companion to be, Kichijiro, a man who appears to be without a single conviction. Garfield earns the almost venomous description Rodrigues grants to the man, suggesting Rodrigues at his lowest point still distraught over all that he has witnessed. His broken state reaches a tipping point as he attempts to find water, and this time literally sees a vision of El Greco's Christ in his own reflection. Garfield is rather amazing in the scene by throwing himself into the insanity of Rodrigues in the moment, as he is unable to contemplate the meaning. Shortly afterwards he is caught by the Japanese inquisitors, having been betrayed by Kichijiro, and placed with a group of Japanese Christian prisoners. It is here that Garfield crafts a fascinating juxtaposition between what Rodrigues presents outwardly, and what is found internally.

Initially Rodrigues scolds the Christians over their calmness given the situation they are in, Garfield expressing still that madness stemming from his doubts. When one of the young Christians though offers words of comfort while turning to Rodrigues for assurance, Garfield is exceptional in the way he is able to realize this switch in Rodrigues in a moment. The change is not a true change, he offers an attempt of bringing that sort of guidance he had before. It isn't quite the same though as Garfield expresses Rodrigues's concern still for the people, yet he no longer has the same convictions himself. Rodrigues becomes a target of sorts by the inquisitor, who intends to have him apostatize in order to be an example for all the remaining Japanese Christians. Garfield's performance manages to find this strange dichotomy as Rodrigues, because of the inquisitor's plan, becomes set on becoming an example of conviction. Garfield's work is outstanding as he is able to provide these two mindsets outwardly and internally in tandem. As Garfield offers the spirit of a righteous man standing for his beliefs as he positioned in front of one challenge after another, meanwhile given time to look inwardly while true convictions are fading.

The Japanese attempt to break Rodrigues through a series of horrible acts. There is one unforgettable scene where Rodrigues is presented with a captured father Garupe who is given his own chance to apostatize to save the Christians, but instead chooses to attempt to physically save them leading to his own death. Garfield gives one of the most harrowing depictions of anguish you'll see on screen as he struggles to cry out to Garupe but is held back by his captors. Garfield is incredible in the moment yet what makes this leave the greater impact, is the way he effectively depicts Rodrigues take in every violent act. They do phase him then they are gone, Garfield gives us a man haunted by every death. He's incredible as he captures the sheer intensity of such torture in his very being. There is no point lost in this portrayal of Rodrigues, we understand every moment both as he is face to face with his persecutors and as he is speaking within his own soul. One of the final attempts to break Rodrigues comes with being presented with father Ferriera a broken man. Garfield is heartbreaking as he begins to merge the internal and the external as argues with his own mentor. The feelings of betrayal are palatable as is his own terrible distress fitting as the very man who helped teach him the faith now wishes for him to abandon it.

Silence is a masterpiece. Martin Scorsese directs the film aware of the inherit strength of the story. As with his work on The Wolf Wall Street, where he did not tell these men were bad he rather showed them in their natural despicable behavior, Scorsese does not hold your hand through this story. He allows one to experience it for themselves. This approach makes Andrew Garfield's work paramount to the film's success. Rodrigues struggle must be through Garfield, and Garfield must be the one to realize through his performance the most daring finalization of his journey. We are given in the end a man who makes not the sacrifice you'd expect, as Rodrigues does tread on the Fumie, but it is not as the act one would believe to be. Garfield grants the emotional weight in the moment but it is not the desperate act of a broken man, as it may have been for Ferriera when he did the same. There is pain but so much more as Garfield embodies this man who closer with God than ever while technically refuting him. This journey needs to be understood for the film to be successful. Garfield's performance is a powerful performance in terms of sheer emotion. What makes it extraordinary is, again, is his embodiment of this man. His portrayal goes beyond any simplifications of martyrdom, to offer a truly profound experience of man finding his faith through silence.

Tuesday, 7 February 2017

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Michael Keaton in The Founder

Michael Keaton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Ray Kroc in The Founder.

The Founder tells the story of the foundation of McDonalds. The film isn't bad but it is a little weird because director John Lee Hancock doesn't seem to understand the nature of the story.

John Lee Hancock oddly directs with the same old bag of tricks that he used in his earlier films like The Blind Side and Saving Mr. Banks. There's no cynicism to his work, in fact there only seems to be optimism which is a strange fit to even the screenplay itself which plays out more like the Social Network than The Pursuit of Happyness. As bizarre as it is, Hancock and a few of the minor actors in the film are the only ones who seem lost in regards to what the tone should be. The man who seems to understand it the best is Michael Keaton.Technically speaking though in the early scenes of the film we are given a Ray Kroc who might be a bit more suitable to the type of character that John Lee Hancock likes to follow. Kroc in the opening scenes is just a past his prime salesman still trying to hock goods, in this case milkshake mixers. Keaton doesn't quite make Kroc Shelley Levine from Glengarry Glen Ross, but he does gives us a salesman whose beginning to show his rust. Keaton brings still that idea of the energy needed for a salesman, even when he is failing to make his sales, but he grants the right sense that the pitch has been delivered a few too many times.

Keaton makes Kroc a washed up salesman but a likable enough washed up salesman. Keaton brings that Keatoness that only Keaton could possibly bring which has a definite charm to it, and is a great fit for Ray Kroc. Kroc comes across something new by discovering the innovative fast food design of McDonalds, owned by the McDonald brothers Mac (John Carroll Lynch), and Dick (Nick Offerman). They give them their history, of failure yet eventual success. Keaton's terrific as he brings out this certain spark back to Kroc, possibly from his prime, as he looks upon the brother's successful idea. What's special about what Keaton does though is even in these early scenes there is something a little devious in his eyes. As he pitches the idea of McDonalds as a franchise to the brothers, he pitches it as basically something for America. Keaton makes the passion in Kroc's voice real and even makes it rather endearing yet not wholly truthful. Keaton shows just enough of it to be act in the way he portrays Kroc's glances at those golden arches. His eyes are not filled with hope for all of three of them to achieve their dream, rather a selfish desire only for himself.

It is easy enough to sympathize with Kroc early on still as Keaton so effectively realizes the sheer exuberance in the man as he goes about his attempt to begin the franchise. He underlines this though with a bit less certainty in Kroc with every initial failure. Keaton uses his few scenes with Kroc's first wife Ethel (Laura Dern) particularly well. In these scenes Keaton gives us an actual vulnerability in Kroc as he reveals the desperation in his ambition actually. When he says that "enough" will never be enough, Keaton does not deliver it as inspirational, rather he undercuts it with a certain distress in Kroc's voice. Now the following scenes probably wouldn't work with so many actors in the role. They are just Kroc at first working out the various kinks in the plan, while dealing with the frustrations related to the McDonald brothers who take a long time to make any decision. When Kroc is just "hoofing" it, dealing with some of the most minute details of the business, Keaton manages to make these scenes work better than they should because he's such a naturally entertaining and engaging presence, even when doing something such as yelling at an investor for using lettuce on the burgers.

We are given pure premium Keaton though as the franchises take off and Kroc only gets better at his task. Keaton is brilliant as the pure salesman selling more than just the idea to the investors, selling a dream instead. Keaton brings the grandeur needed in it all as he sells it all, and makes the success convincing just through the magnificent of his pitch. Keaton even maintains some real sympathy for Kroc by so bluntly still portraying the initial frustrations with the brothers who delay him at every turn. There is a change though as Kroc decides to take things into his own hands by essentially stealing the company out from underneath the brothers, and becoming the "true" founder of McDonalds. This is kind of where we have this certain conflict between Keaton and the film itself. In that Keaton knows where the story needs to go, but the film seems a little unsure of itself. Keaton is not afraid though to take the darker turn as he has Kroc reveal his true colors. The thing is Keaton never hid the seeds of this, having the devious quality from his first sale, but he takes it to the next level as Kroc goes about removing any obstacles in his path.

Keaton just relishes in the metaphorical kill as he takes any loophole he can to remove the McDonalds' claim. I have to admit my particular affection for his callous delivery of "Contracts are like hearts, they're meant to broken". Kroc's no prisoners attitude though extends even to his personal life as he decides to drop his wife for another. Although it is an extremely brief scene, as though the film is in some way timid towards the subject matter, Keaton is not timid as he so coldly delivers Kroc's demand for a divorce. Keaton inflicts within it no shame, just a heartless sentiment of a man who intends on getting whatever he wants no matter what. Keaton simply excels in the final moments of the film as Kroc secures every last part of McDonalds for himself. He's outstanding in the scene as he bothers with the good old salesman just one more time, offering such sincerity as he says he'll honor their bargain with a handshake. Keaton compliments this perfectly with the perfect smug satisfaction exudes a scene later when he tells Dick McDonald why he stole their idea in this exact way. Keaton's performance doesn't just elevate the film it gives the proper meaning to it. Keaton never sugarcoats his Ray Kroc, he goes about giving an honest depiction of a businessman who will do whatever it takes to get on top.  By taking the darker turn he needs to take with his performance Keaton shows that this isn't an inspirational portrait of a man achieving his dream, it's the story of a man stealing someone else's dream and making it his own.

Monday, 6 February 2017

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Joel Edgerton in Loving

Joel Edgerton did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Richard Loving in Loving.

Loving tells the true story of an interracial couple in the 60's whose marriage would eventually challenge the law against it in the supreme court. Interestingly enough the film is best just when it depicts the people living their life, although I will say this is in part due to whatever Nick Kroll is doing as the Loving's attorney, Bernie Cohen. If director Jeff Nichols needed a Jeff Goldblum surrogate again why not use Adam Driver as he did for Midnight Special, but I digress.

Joel Edgerton is an actor who has flown under the radar for awhile even though his profile has gradually risen with every year. This seems to have happened once again with this film, as he did receive just a few notices for his work though his co-star Ruth Negga, as Richard's wife Mildred, was Oscar nominated for her work. The funny thing about that is though out of all the actors who kind of where in the realm of being potentially nominated this year, Joel Edgerton's work is perhaps the most transformative out of all of them, the problem being it is the kind of transformative work that you need to be a little more known to begin with for most to notice. To explain, Edgerton's work here is a far cry from his performances as the sleazy FBI agent in Black Mass, or the creepy loner in his own directorial debut, The Gift. Richard is nothing like those men, and here Edgerton seeks to embody a different kind of man, far beyond merely his blond hair and crew cut.

Edgerton's work is technically speaking extremely mannered, in his attempt to fully embody this very particular sort of man. This of course relates to his consistent and authentic Virginia accent, but that's only part of it. Edgerton speaks with a low rumble, speaking as a man who only really wants those closest to him to hear him. Even the deliver itself reflects this certain idea in Edgerton's particular contortion of his mouth, fitting to a man who mostly doesn't speak. His physical approach conveys this natural reluctance towards the spotlight, a shyness to ever seek attention. What is most remarkable in all of this is how natural Edgerton makes it all feel. The way he portrays Richard is forgotten just a few minutes into the film as you quickly accept that you just merely are watching Richard. Again it is technically speaking extremely mannered turn yet Edgerton does not make seem fussy at all, strangely enough it seems decidedly non-fussy. Edgerton through his approach never seeks attention which in turn fits this man who never desires attention.

A remarkable aspect of the story is that the Lovings were not what would be considered radical at the time, and in fact didn't really seem to be all that politically minded. Their story is far simpler in nature as the two merely came from the same county of working class people who just didn't really distinguish by race. A central aspect of Edgerton's performance is this idea. He presents Richard's love for Mildred as about as pure as something can be. It is rather fascinating what Edgerton does here in that his depiction of this is so genuine in its simplicity that he even creates an understanding that the idea their marriage would get them in any real trouble never even crossed his mine. In one of Edgerton's earliest scenes we see this as Richard shows Mildred where he is going to build their future home, and where he pledges to marry her. There is something ethereal in the moment, yet it still feels entirely of this earth. Although Richard's words are minor, and Edgerton's delivery unassuming you'll find few declarations of affection that feel as honest as the one in this scene.

Looking at the film is fascinating in that the film itself seems a bit like the Lovings. In that the Lovings just wanted to just be left alone to live their life, happily married in Virginia, and the film seems like it wants most to stay just with these two people doing just that. What interferes with this though are the authorities of Virginia who repeatedly emerge in order to keep the two separated from each other. This is even handled in a fairly low key fashion, even having the racist Sheriff be relatively calm figure all things considered. Nevertheless the two still are arrested for their marriage and presented at trial. Even in the court the two basically let their lawyer do the talking but that is not to say they have nothing to say particularly Richard who only says a scant few words, and performance wise Edgerton quite frankly almost makes Chris Pine in Hell or High Water look like Denzel Washington in Fences times with just how understated he is.

Edgerton does not seem to need words because of how he embodies Richard's personality. In the first trial sequence, where Richard also is not allowed to personally bail his wife out of prison, we see Richard go from one authority to another in order to be reunited with his wife. Edgerton is outstanding in the way he creates the sense of the emotional intensity in Richard without raising his voice. In just the most slightly halted breath, a turn of his brown, and crook in his mouth you can sense the man holding back so much. There is incredible moment where Richard waits outside after a non-fortuitous trial. The distress in Edgerton is so powerful in the scene as he realizes it just in his eyes, and his bones as he is merely just smoking a cigarette. Richard stays together, but Edgerton wears the turmoil in his very being. Richard throughout his and his wife's troubles keeps the idea that above all he just wants to be left to live his life. One of my favorite moments in the film is when Richard explains this fact to Cohen, as he just asks if can just tell the judge that the "won't bother anyone". This could seem silly in its naivety but Edgerton makes it heartbreaking by making this simplicity of the demand so painfully honest.

Again though I think the film thrives most just letting us see the Lovings as they are, and Edgerton thrives within this as well. He's still quite tight lipped, but that is never to say he's not expressive. Something I love is his chemistry with Ruth Negga, which interestingly outside of their initial scene together we do not hear the two of them vocalize their love directly to one another all that often. Their love though is never in question, and not just because of those earlier scenes. I love the physical way in which Edgerton portrays his true devotion to his wife. There is such a comfort in the way they touch other, and interact. They just merely seem right in the others' embrace, they do not even need to say they love one another to each other because it is already evident without a word. Richard is a man who is more or less a constant in terms of personality. The major change in the man is just the frustrations in dealing with law against his marriage. There is something I love about Edgerton work that he realizes in this. In that throughout he does convey the underlying fear in Richard as he watches his family knowing there is a danger, but also the unease as the spotlight is shown on them. Edgerton brings the right difficulty in Richard just to withstand the press and even his own lawyers, reflective of a man who only ever just wanted to live out in the country with his family. When it is all over though, and he finally hears that a court has found in his favor, Edgerton reacts with just a simple smile. That's all he needs though, and it is such a beautiful moment since as the joy feels so genuine to this man Edgerton has shown us. This is a brilliant subtle performance by Joel Edgerton as he realizes this man and his struggle with such eloquence and a true poignancy.

Sunday, 5 February 2017

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Chris Pine in Hell or High Water

Chris Pine did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Toby Howard in Hell or High Water.

Chris Pine and Gil Birmingham have gone to be somewhat unsung elements of Hell or High Water playing the less flashy side of the central duos of the robbers and the cops. Pine, despite his fairly high profile as an actor, went unnoticed for the most part where Jeff Bridges as the Texas Ranger Marcus Hamilton, and Ben Foster as Toby's brother Tanner basically were the only actors to receive best supporting actor wins from critical bodies without the name Mahershala Ali. What about Pine though, a slightly underrated actor actually since some just take him as a bland leading man, evidently those people have never seen him in his collaborations with Joe Carnahan. This though does gives himself the chance the prove he can thrive without going partially insane. This is the type of role though that does not often get an actor noticed though, even though he plays the co-lead, some even argue sole lead, along with Jeff Bridges, he is the far more understated role when compared to the flashier nature of Bridges's and Foster's characters.

Pine plays the role of the lead robber Toby who actually is the one that sets the story in motion by coming up with the plan to steal from the bank that holds their family's ranch's mortgage in order to pay off the debt to the same bank that was accrued by their recently deceased mother in order to also keep the recently discovered oil on the land. Toby though is new to this recruiting his ex-con brother Tanner, with a past in robbery, in order to pull off the jobs. In this Pine is very effective in portraying this straight shooter attempting to be a criminal. In the robbery scenes, even though his face is covered, Pine is very good in just bringing this physical awkwardness to everything he does. The way he holds a gun on the people in the bank has this lack of confidence alluding to the the idea that the man not only hasn't done it before, but is not at all comfortable with endangering others. Pine brings the right hesitation in it, making so even when he finally fires a gun during the robbery he shows it to be such a flimsy desperate act, as he is clearly still trying not to hurt someone who is definitely trying to hurt him.

Although it is also easy enough to overlook that, what really makes this performance special is its Gary Cooperesque quality, though of course I mean more that idea of a Gary Cooperesque quality that is apparently suppose exist in Gary Cooper. Pine work so well in the limits of his portrayal of Toby, which purposefully never breaks the style of the character. In that Toby is a man of few words, and Pine respects that with his minimalist portrayal. He keeps his approach as very internalized and feels very authentic of this Texan man who is just trying to do what he believes is the right thing to do. Pine portrays no real thrill in the act itself, even creating the sense of a certain reluctance to it despite the fact that it is Toby's idea. Pine makes this make sense though as his portrayal captures this specific individualistic morality in Toby. Pine in the way he speaks of the plan creates the sense of the righteousness of his passion but also his understanding that what the act entails is not wholly moral. There is a great moment where Toby tells one of his sons that he should believe whatever they say about him, its an incredible moment for Pine as in his voice there is this conviction that what he is doing is the right thing but has to do it in the wrong way.

I will save some of what I have to say in regards to the central relationship of Toby and Tanner for another review. I will say though Pine on his end is absolutely fantastic as the "good brother". He never simplifies the relationship. He portrays the connection, even with some surprisingly effective bit of humor in there, but also the distance as they are men of a very different nature. Again more on that soon enough, but it should be sufficient to say that Pine is excellent on his end of crafting this layered and rich history the two men share. The main conflict though being that Tanner's motivations are not nearly as pure as Toby's. Pine again, in his so subtle way, keeps this conflict as a constant. In the robberies, only when we see Toby's eyes, Pine is terrific in portraying that concern as he believes that his brother could possibly go too far at any given point. When he does go too far we get really the only moment where Pine breaks from his more understated approach, which is wholly earned since Toby is suffering from bullet wound as well at the time. Pine delivers the palatable anguish in his scream, as well as the direct pain, as Toby realizes it has gone too far.

Pine's work though is so much quieter but this in no way mutes his impact at any point. Although again more on that relationship later, but it is Pine who finalizes it. It is a heartbreaking moment for Pine as he portrays the sadness in hearing about his brother's final end. What makes it so moving though is the way Pine shows it is less as a surprise but more of an acceptance of something he knew was going to happen eventually. Now in my review of Bridges's work I praised his final scene in particular, which is one of the best scenes of 2016 in terms of writing, directing and acting. That acting includes Pine just as much as it does Bridges. Something that makes the scene so compelling is how we understand exactly what is going on with both man. Pine is amazing in the scene as he matches Bridges in bringing that underlying intensity. Both actors are so good at essentially giving this understanding between the two men even though it is never precisely stated. It's quite something that it is one of the most tension filled scene in years but there's basically no music, no one raises their voice, and no violence occurs. Bridges and Pine again are so pivotal to this. There is a glint of hatred in his eyes that conveys exactly what Marcus took away from Toby. Pine does not let that define his work though. There's far more as he portrays an unease in Toby as though he is attempting to decipher the old man's intentions exactly as they speak. When Marcus presses Toby for his motivation, Pine is truly remarkable as subtly portrays the moral compromise but also the moral conviction in just the most minor facial gestures, and his gentle delivery. We know exactly where both men stand due to their performances, and that is what makes their final trade off leave such an impact. Pine and Bridges allows us to sympathize with both man as they leave with their haunting offerings of "peace". Pine's work here should not be overlooked when discussing the film. He gives a captivating performance, that is not overshadowed which very easily could have been when ole Ben Foster your co-star. Pine though also makes us emphasize wholly with Toby as he never simplifies the man, or the decision that he makes.

Saturday, 4 February 2017

Alternate Best Actor 2016: Adam Driver in Paterson

Adam Driver did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning and being nominated for several critical prizes, for portraying Paterson in Paterson.

100 percent about what is about to be said may be all false or 0 percent of it may be true. There is also a 72 percent chance that none of it is true, but also a 88 percent chance that 25 percent of it is.

Paragraph 1: I approach my keyboard preparing to write a review for Adam Driver in Paterson a film where he plays a bus driver for the city Paterson while playing a man named Paterson. I notice there is a hangnail on one of my fingers. It could easily be pulled so I retrieve nail clippers from a drawer and remove the unneeded attachment. I return back to the keyboard. I press on the f key, it's a bit sticky, I should replace it. I type noticing that there is strange task in reviewing this performance in a film about seemingly nothing. Who is this Adam Driver guy anyways? I probably should investigate. I go off to the local library only to find there are no books written about Adam Driver, though there is a book on how to drive a Vauxhall Adam. A random bystander passes by exclaiming "that dudes Kylo Renn, he's got his light saber he goes broommmmm, broommmmm, he killed Han Solo, screw that guy".

Paragraph 2: I return to a keyboard somewhere to continue to the review. I find in the comments section of my last review a question "Thoughts on Buddy the Wonder Dog in Air Bud?'. I ponder the question. The comment continues "Big fan of the air bud franchise but I noticed you've barely ranked any of the dogs.". At this time my own dog barks in the room. I walk outside to notice that the light is on in my car. I turn off the light, and see my neighbor is home. He beckons me to come inside. My neighbor is playing darts with a picture of himself across the room. He asks what am I doing. I say I'm reviewing Adam Driver in Paterson. I explain it is a hard nut to crack. He asks "why". I explain that it is a curiously compelling work even though he doesn't seem to do anything. "Sounds boring" he says as he throws a dart in his own photographic eye. I say but it's not.

Paragraph 3: I decide to take a break from the rigors of performance review and go off to the store in order to gather food for my dinner. As I wait in the line I stand behind two shoppers deep in conversation. The first person exclaims "Count Chocula doesn't taste like it used to" the other person asks "What do you mean?", the first continues "Count Chocula doesn't taste like it used to", "the cereal?" the other inquires, "who else is there?" the first counters "I sure love Boo Berry" the other claims, "What are you talking about? It doesn't taste the same anymore either" the first finishes. After my dinner, I continue the review questioning what it is there about this portrayal of a bus driver who likes to write poems is engaging. I ponder if it is the way Driver says certain words like "Blue Tip", there may be something to this.

Paragraph 4: I arrive at a local bar sitting at the counter to contemplate the performance further. I am approached by an actor who overhears my dilemma. "What's the drama, where is the conflict?" the actor inquires. I explain that there is none. We mostly just observe this man who goes about his day, a few slightly atypical things happen, nothing major and he treats any of the strange things in a pretty straight forward fashion. "What? You gotta have conflict to connect.". I attempt to tell the actor that there is just something strangely fascinating about watching the man be himself, perhaps there's just something strangely fascinating about Adam Driver. "Nothing bad happens to him?" the incredulous man asks. I reply that his poetry book is ruined by his dog. "That's it! I'm dealing with real drama" the actor balks at the idea. What you are in? I ask. "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, I'm the titular role".  Where? "At the High School down the street." You're a student? I wonder aloud. "I'm the janitor, they let me play there though, it's going to be great.".

Paragraph 5: Still unsatisfied I walk down to a park, sitting at bench next to a trickling stream. A German approaches and sits next to me. The German has a book that reads "Performance Review". "I love a good performance" the German exclaims. I say, huh? "I write reviews of performances, this is my book." Is there a performance your currently writing about, I ask. "Jerry Lewis in The Day the Clown Cried.". Haven't seen that one, how is it? I pose the question. "Heartbreaking work, deals with a clown during the holocaust" I say oh, then explain that I am also writing a review, about a guy who just kinda gets upset in a normal fashion over having his poetry destroyed. He never gets too upset no matter what happens, somehow it feels natural, and is actually pretty funny as well as endearing. It's a performance that fits the film's tone perfectly, and just happens to be captivating in this unique way. "Hmmm" the German nods, "Give him a 4.5". The German leaves the park. I wait a moment more before getting up myself, walking home, and going to bed.