Wednesday, 6 November 2013

Alternate Best Actor 2000: Chow Yun-Fat in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

Chow Yun-Fat did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Li Mu Bai in Chow Yun-Fat in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is an entertaining martial arts film about two warriors in search of a stolen sword.

Chow Yun-Fat role is one tailored made for Chow Yun-Fat. Li Mu Bai is the great warrior of the film, although I would very much classify him as lead, he has the least screen time of the film. Li Mu Bai shows up every time in the film to be this wise man who is a master with the sword. He basically shows up pretty much just to get things done by being the most competent person in the room, the courtyard or the forest. Li Mu Bai is a great swordsman and this must be understood. There is not any build up for Li Mu Bai really whenever he shows up it must be understood that he is an impressive force instantly the man to do this is of course Chow Yun-Fat.

Chow Yun-Fat has a terrific amount of natural screen presence which is perfect for this role where he has to make his impact so quickly. Yun-Fat is able to allow us to take it for granted that Li Mu Bai is this great man that the film makes him out to be.Yun-Fat is able to exude the right confidence for Li Mu Bai. Yun-Fat's presence is a unique one where he has strong presence although he always feels rather unassuming in his methods. Yun-Fat never seems uncaring though even as he delivers in the part with such a general ease in his approach. Yun-Fat always brings quiet conviction in his eyes even as he keeps Li Mu Bai a man who is fairly contained with his emotions.

Yun-Fat fits this part without question and makes Li Mu Bai everything that he should stand. Whether it is a wisdom which Yun-Fat conveys through the assured manner he has in the role, or his fighting ability where Yun-Fat of course excels as he is a master of an action scene being believable no matter how absurd a set piece may be. Technically there is also a path that Li Mu Bai is following to find justice for his murdered master, but even this Yun-Fat portrays as a wholly righteous cause. Chow Yun-Fat keeps this as something that Li Mu Bai feels is his duty, but not an unhealthy obsession which is the right way considering the nature of the role.

The unsaid love story between Li Mu Bai and Yu Shu Lien (Michelle Yeoh) is very well played by both actors as they find the right poignancy through just the genuine simplicity of the love they portray between the two warriors. They both suggest so well in their reaction to one another making the moment at the end of the film when they do vocalize their feelings rather moving. In the end this is not an overly complex role for Chow Yun-Fat, what is demanded from him is to be a very traditional sort of hero who is sympathetic and skilled. Chow Yun-Fat absolutely meets these demands and makes Li Mu Bai properly fulfill his role in the scheme of the film.

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Alternate Best Actor 2000: Guy Pearce in Memento

Guy Pearce did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite earning a few critical citations, for portraying Leonard Shelby in Memento.

Memento is a brilliant film that depicts, in reverse chronological order, a man with Anterograde amnesia's attempt to find the man who murdered his wife.

The role of Leonard Shelby is a most unusual challenge for an actor. Most leading parts have some sort of character arc they follow through the film changing in some way as the film progresses. Well Leonard Shelby is a character incapable of such changes in the long run, but not in the short run. Guy Pearce must start fresh in every scene that he has with Leonard as Leonard completely forgets what he just did at the end of the last scene. This seems like something that would possibly make Leonard a character who does not go anywhere, as well technically speaking Leonard never does learn anything, he is incapable of learning anything, but Leonard is made a fascinating character because Pearce makes every scene in the film a self enclosed character arc for Leonard.

Firstly though Leonard does have some constants as Leonard does know who he is, or at least believes he knows who he is, and has his own set of routines he uses to attempt to deal with his rare disability which prevents him from creating new memories. Pearce is excellent in showing this routine that Leonard has devised for himself for how he should interact for every situation. We can see the problem in Pearce's performance as in the start of every new scene Pearce starts with the sense of bewilderment, and the attempt to try to hone in on things to figure out what it is that he is doing exactly. This is one of the best narrations given by Pearce here as his voice always accentuates the learning process and amplifies the strength of his physical performance.

Pearce is an actor with quite the substantial level of charisma which he uses perfectly here to once again show one of the instincts that Leonard has developed due to his condition. Most of the time there is a certain friendliness that Pearce conveys in the way Leonard greets just about anyone. Pearce shows Leonard talk to everyone in a welcoming way to almost cover up or at least excuse his condition to them. Pearce makes it not wholly natural though, as it should be, there is an effort Pearce suggests that Leonard has and that he must always bring himself to keep up his routine of treating everyone like he knows them in some way even he very well might have never met them for once in his life. Pearce properly keeps this with his performance as Leonard handles each situation, at least at first, with his developed instincts.

After the opening moments though there is any way that Leonard might go due to what might occur in the scenes. What might be the most common is Leonard being the detective hero. This one is frankly exactly where Leonard wants to be as Pearce plays it. When there is something that calls for him to be the hero seeking righteous revenge he wears the part as nicely as his well tailored suit. Pearce makes this Leonard's most comfortable act as there is an especially strong drive and conviction that Pearce suggests when Leonard thinks he knows what he is doing. Pearce is terrific in fooling you the way that Leonard is honestly fooling himself. Pearce makes Leonard a man happy to be detective as it is what gives his life the purpose and the direction he cannot find otherwise due to his memory less.

Pearce is our guide to Leonard's most peculiar situation and most a interesting guide at that as Leonard goes about telling his day to day life through the story of man he believes suffered from the same condition as he had. We hear Leonard tell the story of Sammy Jenkins throughout the film and Pearce is incredible as he slowly changes Leonard's manner as the tell the story. At first Pearce delivers it as just a simple sort of way as something he goes by but not something that means too much to him. Pearce though increases the connection that Leonard seems to have to the story as he slowly becomes more emotional and Pearce begins to allude that the story really might be about him. Pearce no longer shows Leonard as the confidant detective who can deal with issue as the fear, anguish and confusion appear which haunt Leonard.

Guy Pearce is outstanding in the way he plays this part with just the right amount of ease. This is not to say this is light weight in any way, but with Pearce's method there is the sense that since Leonard has been this way for so long he takes things in stride. Pearce's approach allows him to very naturally change his manner from scene to scene. Although this film is technically serious there are are actually a few great comedic moments found in the film which are particularly effective because of Pearce's performance. One of these moments being when he accidentally knocks out an innocent man because he misread one of notes. Pearce's reaction is hilarious because it is the reaction of man who just knows that these sort of things will happen with his condition so just a quick "sorry" would do.

There are not just comic moments in store for Leonard as deep down he actually is a tortured soul even if he can't remember that fact. Pearce is very moving whenever Leonard ever takes a moment to think back to his wife who he remembers as almost a puzzle at times. Pearce brings out a different side in these scenes as he portrays Leonard filled with a lament and a certain nostalgic. It is not just a love for his wife that Pearce brings out in these scenes, although that is there, he also gives the sense of Leonard grasping at these comforting thoughts not only in the traditional sense but as well in the sense that they are memories he still has  while he exist currently in a world with no memories of anything good or bad.

Pearce is never at a lost in his performance and any scene wherever it may go Pearce stands firm as Leonard and stays believable. Pearce can go from one scene as a tender caring heroic gentleman to an intense man filled with violence. Pearce accomplishes this every time by creating these miniature arcs for the scenes. Pearce never rushes nor does he skips. He brings Leonard to every extreme point in a completely genuine fashion. In the final scenes of the film some rather disconcerting things come out with what has really been going on with Leonard. Pearce absolutely delivers with the revelations as he reveals the unstable nature of Leonard. When Leonard murder Pearce makes it as a call back to a seed of revenge, as soon as he knows its John G. Leonard can kill without hesitation as Pearce expresses this as Leonard's ultimate purpose.

Memento is a film that has received much high praise and much talk, but I find too often that Pearce is a bit of the unsung hero of the film. Pearce's performance is essential to the success of the film as his performance makes the unusual structure work as much as the screenplay, direction and editing do. With the wrong actor Leonard could have easily been just a boring character, a character completely overshadowed by the film's structure, or just hard to believe in all of the events of the story. He not only flows with the unconventional structure he does it with style. I love Guy Pearce here as he gives a great performance that allows the audience to easily follow the story through his assured portrayal, but gives every moment of the story have all the greater impact through his effortlessly ability to bring the best out of any scene no matter what the scene's tone may even be.

Monday, 4 November 2013

Alternate Best Actor 2000

And the Nominees Were Not:

Christian Bale in American Psycho

Eric Bana in Chopper

Chow Yun-Fat in Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

Guy Pearce in Memento

George Clooney in O Brother Where Art Thou?

Sunday, 3 November 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1999: Results

5. Brad Pitt in Fight Club-Brad Pitt gives a good enough performance that is charismatic enough although not to the level the film suggests his character should be.

Best Scene: "Hit me as hard as you can"
4. Edward Norton in Fight Club- Norton, in the less showy role of the two leads of the film, gives the more consistent performance effectively portraying his character's strange journey through the film.

Best Scene: The Narrator tries to go to the police.
3. Forest Whitaker in Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai- Whitaker performance is all about creating the style of the samurai which he handles wonderfully well. 

Best Scene: Ghost Dog takes down the gangsters.
2. Guy Pearce in Ravenous- Pearce is very effective by being the sane man among the insanity.

Best Scene: Captain Boyd sees his new commanding officer.
1. Jim Carrey in Man on the Moon- Jim Carrey proves himself a master mimic as he becomes Andy Kaufman and every character he played.

Best Scene: Andy's first time doing the foreigner. 
Overall Rank:
  1. Richard Farnsworth in The Straight Story
  2. Bob Hoskins in Felicia's Journey
  3. Jim Carrey in Man on the Moon
  4. Jim Broadbent in Topsy-Turvy
  5. Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense
  6. Russell Crowe in The Insider
  7. Guy Pearce in Ravenous
  8. Forest Whitaker in Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai
  9. Heath Ledger in Two Hands
  10. Anthony Hopkins in Titus
  11. Nicolas Cage in Bringing Out the Dead 
  12. Edward Norton in Fight Club
  13. Tom Hanks in The Green Mile
  14. Bruce Willis in The Sixth Sense
  15. Ron Livingston in Office Space
  16. Al Pacino in The Insider
  17. Mel Gibson in Payback
  18. Terence Stamp in The Limey  
  19. Om Puri in East is East 
  20. Denzel Washington in The Hurricane
  21. Ralph Fiennes in Sunshine 
  22. Brad Pitt in Fight Club
  23. Eddie Murphy Bowfinger
  24. Jeremy Northam in The Winslow Boy
  25. Kevin Spacey in America Beauty
  26. Tom Cruise in Eyes Wide Shut 
  27. Allan Corduner in Topsy-Turvy
  28. Brendan Fraser in The Mummy
  29. Tim Allen in Galaxy Quest
  30. Ralph Fiennes in The End of the Affair
  31. Keanu Reeves in The Matrix
  32. John Cusack in Being John Malkovich
  33. Johnny Depp in Sleepy Hollow
  34. Eddie Murphy in Life
  35. George Clooney in Three Kings
  36. Heath Ledger in 10 Things I Hate About You 
  37. Matthew Broderick in Election 
  38. Jake Gyllenhaal in October Sky 
  39. William Eadie in Ratcatcher
  40. Eli Marienthal in The Iron Giant
  41. Rupert Everett in An Ideal Husband 
  42. Nigel Hawthorne in The Winslow Boy 
  43. Al Pacino in Any Given Sunday
  44. Mark Wahlberg in Three Kings
  45. John Leguizamo in Summer of Sam
  46. Ben Foster in Liberty Heights
  47. Joe Breen in Angela's Ashes
  48. Ciaran Owens in Angela's Ashes
  49. Michael Legge in Angela's Ashes
  50. Adrien Brody in Summer of Sam
  51. Ben Stiller in Mystery Men 
  52. Clint Eastwood in True Crime
  53. Adrien Brody in Liberty Heights
  54. Steve Martin Bowfinger
  55. Robin Williams in Jakob the Liar
  56. Billy Crystal in Analyze This
  57. Robert De Niro in Analyze This
  58. Tom Hanks in Toy Story 2
  59. Tim Allen in Toy Story 2
  60. Sean Penn in Sweet and Lowdown
  61. Hugh Grant in Notting Hill 
  62. Ethan Hawke in Snow Falling on Cedars
  63. Jeremy Theobald in Following
  64. Philip Seymour Hoffman in Flawless
  65. Pierce Brosnan in The World is Not Enough
  66. Martin Lawrence in Life
  67. Matt Damon in The Talented Mr. Ripley
  68. Johnny Depp in The Ninth Gate
  69. Willem Dafoe in The Boondock Saints 
  70. Robert De Niro in Flawless 
  71. Alex Haw in Following
  72. Jude Law in eXistenZ
  73. Arnold Schwarzenegger in End of Days
  74. Joseph Gordon-Levitt 10 Things I Hate About You
  75. Martin Lawrence in Blue Streak
  76. Liam Neeson in The Phantom Menace
  77. Devon Sawa in Idle Hands
  78. Mike Myers in Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me
  79. Thomas Jane in Deep Blue Sea  
  80. Freddie Cunliffe in The War Zone
  81. Adam Sandler in Big Daddy
  82. Steve Martin in The Out of Towners
  83. Sean Patrick Flanery in Simply Irresistible
  84. Tobey Maguire in The Cider House Rules 
  85. James Van Der Beek in Varsity Blues
  86. Norman Reedus in The Boondock Saints
  87. Sean Patrick Flanery in The Boondock Saints
  88. Jake Lloyd in The Phantom Menace
Next Year: 2000 lead

Alternate Best Actor 1999: Edward Norton and Brad Pitt in Fight Club

Edward Norton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying the narrator in Fight Club.

Fight Club is a film with an intense fan club to say the least, but not one that I subscribe to I'm afraid. I don't hate it, and I liked it well enough on my first viewing, but its style really wore thin on re-watch.

Edward Norton plays the unnamed protagonist of the film who starts out as that of the corporate drone who is a numb man going through his life just buying random things for himself. He only finds anything for himself by releasing himself emotionally at various support groups. Norton's performance is that of a very average sad sack suffering from insomnia and just a general detachment from all things. Norton's pretty good in just being a general downer of an individual showing us a man without a past and without much of a future other then faking some sort of ailment for the most basic expression of emotions possible, which really does not bring him to much of anywhere either, but Norton plants the motivation for the narrator's desire to change.

The narrator's life does not really start changing though until he meets Tyler Durden played by Brad Pitt who also did not receive an Oscar nomination for this film. Well here is the spoiler although I am sure you already know it as it is only kept a better secret than the twist ending to Planet of the Apes which is usually used as its poster these days. Anyway the twist is that Tyler Durden is in fact just a figment of the narrator's imagination who the narrator uses as the visualization for himself when he does everything he has dreamed of doing. This means that Brad Pitt does not play a real person rather just an idea of a man, and that idea is being as the ultimate ideal man who is a rebel who wants to make his own cause.

There is not a single scene with Pitt that does not feature Norton but it is Pitt's character that drives Norton's forward making them co-leads who are constantly intertwined in even more way then you think even when they meet near the beginning of the film. Once they meet the narrator always seems one step behind as Durden seems to be shaping him through his long line of tasks which all start with forcing him to get into a violent confrontation as a more volatile way of breaking the narrator's detachment. Norton's and Pitt's performances are on opposite ends. Where Pitt portrays Durden as a constant who always seems to know exactly what he is doing, Norton portrays the narrator as constantly a step behind who is changing due to each of Durden's actions in one way or another. 

Pitt's performance is all about his charisma, and although I will might be severely beaten for this I find that Pitt certainly has charisma here but not all time greatest macho man ever charisma. Pitt is an actor with that natural star magnetism at least in most of his roles and it is present here although I don't feel he goes the extra mile with this performance as Tyler Durden. Yes he is strong and assured in his performance but he never quite makes Durden the figure of almost godly power. I should note this is only criticism of the highest order in that I think the point of Durden is being perfection a point I don't feel Pitt reaches with this performance. Having said that though Pitt is good in the role well at least the first three fourths of the film.

Although I might be burned with acid for this, I'll say that I actually prefer Norton's performance as the narrator. Norton's performance, until the very end of the film, is a reactionary performance and he is rather effective in portraying the way the narrator changes through the story. Norton has the right sort of amazement as the narrator watches and joins Durden as he starts the titular Fight Club and goes on to commit all sorts of mayhem in his anti-establishment behavior. I like Norton's performance because unlike all the supporting players, who I feel terribly overact in this film, Norton conveys the life changing effects of Durden in a believable, far less bombastic fashion, through the way he brings a life to the narrator that was missing at the beginning of the film.

The end of the film changes things for the worse when it comes to Pitt and I suppose for the better when it comes to Norton. Once the twist is revealed Pitt decides to play Durden as a bit more of the villainous character than necessary. Frankly Pitt just needed to continue how he had gone from the start as Durden meets his end, but instead he ends up overplaying Durden in his concluding appearances. The idea that Durden is just a figment of the narrator's mind is taken too far with Pitt as he starts playing him, well as an imaginary character. I suppose that makes sense, but I think it would have made even more sense that Durden stay as he was before as since there is no reason Durden needed to go the way that Pitt takes him at the end of the film.

Norton on the other hand is very good as the narrator is completely taken aback by the revelation and tries very hard to set make some sort of sense of it all and stops Durden(his)'s plan. Norton sells the twist with his performance which excels in portraying the messed up mental state of the narrator as he has to deal with his own disbelief, and fear of what is going on. Most importantly though in these scenes Norton shows the narrator come into his own as a man. Norton loses that detachment from the beginning, but he as well loses that dreamy amazement in Tyler. Norton instead gives the narrator a will of his own and brings the most genuine emotions in the film as the narrator desperately tries to save his although sorta Tyler's lover Marla (Helena Bonham Carter).

Although Brad Pitt's performance is the much more talked about performance in this film, in achieving the purpose of the character Edward Norton's performance is the stronger work. Pitt is just fine in the film but otherworldly he is not, and he comes close to going off the deep end in a bad way in his final scenes which could have highlights of his performance. Edward Norton does not give an amazing performance either and technically, in terms of the heights he must reach, he has far less of challenge, but Norton does meet his lesser challenge much more thoroughly than Pitt does as Durden. Although his character is the one who changes, Norton gives the consistent performance of the two which shows each detail of the journey of the narrator in a convincing manner.
(For Pitt, let the fire rain down upon me)
(For Norton)

Alternate Best Actor 1999: Guy Pearce in Ravenous

Guy Pearce did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Captain John Boyd in Ravenous.

Ravenous, despite its poor critical reception, is a rather effective and most unusual thriller about cannibalism in a remote army base. I would say I can see how its style of a subtle absurdity, if that makes any sense, could turn some off it though.

Guy Pearce is an actor who recently has been cast in the wrong types of roles. For one thing Pearce should be a leading man, this is not to say he can't do well in a supporting part, but leading is where he excels best. I tend to always like Pearce except in the roles of one dimensional villains such as in The Count of Monte Cristo and in Iron Man 3. To be frank, he just seems out of place as villains as they are just not the parts for him and sincerely hope he and the casting directors stop placing him in such spots as he is a great actor when it comes to just about every other type of role but not a great actor when it comes to playing a villain. A weakness certainly but one that can easily be forgiven when he is so good in just about every other type of role.

Anyway with that rant of sorts over on to Ravenous which places Pearce where he should be in the role of Captain John Boyd who at the beginning of the film is a soldier who has recently been promoted during the Mexican American war although he only proved the hero by proving himself a coward who pretended to be dead which placed him under a sea of corpses. For several minutes in Pearce really does not say much of anything but, as he would show later in, The Proposition as well, he is amazing in portraying a powerful internal angst. The film really leaves it to him to show the guilt and shame in his character and Pearce handles his end flawlessly. Even without saying much of anything we see where Boyd is coming from even before he enters the secluded army base surrounded by the wilderness.

Boyd stays rather quiet and reserved until a strange man (Robert Carlyle) appears at the base, who claims to have survived a cannibalistic massacre although things quickly turn for the worse when it turns out that man was actually the cause of the massacre and wishes to make the men at the base his new meals. Guy Pearce is excellent here by just being a man who is way in over his head and correctly reflecting how someone would be in such a situation. While Carlyle, properly so, brings the absurdity of the situation alive through his insane performance Pearce off sets that very effectively by being the sane man in the situation who honestly shows exactly how most people would be through his performance that believably shows all the fear and disbelief that should be shown.

The cannibalism in this film is not shown to be just an extreme survival method but rather a powerful curse that makes you stronger and creates an irresistible urge for human blood once you've tasted a drop. Due to the Captain's time under his comrades' corpses suffers from the curse already. The curse might sound like a somewhat rather silly prospect, and really it is, but Pearce plays it so effectively actually bringing to life in a believable fashion. Robert Carlyle and Jeffrey Jones portray as both going way off the deep end, but Pearce keeps Boyd as the man who wants to retain his humanity and his performance stays far more reserved. Again though Pearce is a master of the silent internal conflict and portrays Boyd's struggle brilliantly.

Guy Pearce gives a pretty terrific performance here actually that does so much for the film. Captain Boyd is a man of few words and his whole point is not going crazy while others do so it would have been easy for him to have been overshadowed. Pearce though owns the film from beginging to end through his assured and thoughtful performance. He makes Boyd's struggle believable and as a guide for the absurd affair brings a surprising amount of realism with his performance. Due to his approach he really builds up the tension of the later scenes of the film because we do care about Boyd. His reactions to the insanity are always remarkable, a particularly love when Boyd sees his new commanding officer turns out to be the cannibal mystery man. This is a very solid turn by Guy Pearce and a good example of the strength as a leading man.

Friday, 1 November 2013

Alternate Best Actor 1999: Jim Carrey in Man on the Moon

Jim Carrey did not receive an Oscar nomination,despite winning a Golden Globe and being nominated for SAG, for portraying Andy Kaufman in Man on the Moon.

Man on the Moon is an interesting and enjoyable film about comedian Andy Kaufman even if you could assemble a great deal of the film with YouTube clips, and it is more of a film about observing Kaufman's antics rather than getting down to who he really was exactly.

Jim Carrey can't seem to catch a break when it comes to the Academy even though he has ventured out from his comfort zone. The reason perhaps though is his most notable films outside of this zone still tend to be funny in some way or another. They might not be broad comedies but perhaps they just are not serious enough for the liking of the Academy for them to be able to accept Jim Carrey as an actor. It seems a shame in that the academy's lineup of 1999 and his recognition in the precursors should have allowed for Carrey to be among the nominees. 99 though is tricky a year for lead actor with the vast differences in the leading lineups presented so it is hard to see if Carrey was knocked out by a Sean Penn which would have been a real shame, or if he was knocked out by Richard Farnsworth which is another story.

Jim Carrey in his standup comedian days was a noted mimic which certainly comes into play here as Andy Kaufman. He not only must imitate Kaufman but he must go to a whole other level by imitating people that Andy Kaufman imitated in the way Kaufman did it. Carrey is simply a master here and if it were not for Carrey very distinct face you would think Kaufman did fake his death just to come back for the film. The funny part is Carrey compensates even with his face though keeping that Andy Kaufman look throughout the entire film. Carrey's voice is as well spot, well not just Kaufman's voice but every voice that Kaufman does is a flawless triumph by Carrey. Carrey who is usually off the wall in his body languages brings it back to reflect that rigid stiff manner of Kaufman as well. Jim Carrey just is Andy Kaufman in this film.

Carrey's work is not a comedic imitation though and he is steadfast in not acting like Kaufman but being Andy Kaufman here right down the line. Milos Foreman's direction puts us not in the mind Kaufman nor as one of his unsuspecting audience members, but rather as a semi-informed party. Yes we know of the pranks and tricks but we don't always know their full extent always, or when something even is a trick. Due to this the film and Carrey make Kaufman a man who seems to always be performing to at least some degree. There are extremely brief moments where we seem to see the true Kaufman only for a moment. These are excellent very short moments in Carrey's performance, but pivotal in creating a fuller portrait of Andy Kaufman as a person.

One example of the real Kaufman is when he has just performed as the foreigner, and his future agent George Shapiro approaches him. Carrey keeps Kaufman performing as the role as the foreigner until Kaufman notices the card. In just a short little glimpse we see just a man who sees a big break. This is a purely honest Andy. Carrey only keeps him completely honest one only for a moment though as Kaufman seems to playing a game again the very next scene. There are few other times, mostly involving Kaufman's girlfriend, and they are all superbly handled by Carrey. The reason is Carrey does show that there is a man behind the endless act, a man with some very normal dreams actually, but a man who chooses to play his games.

For most of the film it is Kaufman do his various types of performances and Carrey excels in each by showing Kaufman excel in each style of humor. There is just the straight forward funny scenes which Carrey is quite at home with. His early act as the foreigner is a perfect bit in Carrey's hands as he goes through the whole awkward part of the foreigner's terrible imitations, to his terrific imitation of Elvis to the hilarious punchline of once again being foreigner. Carrey brings us all the comedic promise by being very entertaining and enjoyable always in Kaufman's style. He never loses the magic of the act of the original act by Kaufman breathing the life into which it deserves. Carrey though continues to be just as convincing though when Kaufman starts to go even further with his brand of humor.

Carrey, just as Kaufman did, let's us decide whether we want to find his antics as the boorish Tony Clifton, also brilliantly imitated by Carrey, or just the random awkward behavior Kaufman does purposefully just to drum up a reaction especially when he becomes a wrestling heel who fights women. Carrey does not apologize in these scenes but with a keen eye of a proper observer you can see the comedic performance. Carrey is the unrepentant jerk, but as well as the man who is winking to the audience in a most peculiar way. Whether it is truly funny comes down to frankly what particularly thing Kaufman is doing as some of his anti-humor worked and some of it I'm sure he found it personally quite side splitting. Carrey replicates the unforgiving nature of Kaufman's brand of humor beautifully even when it gets quite ugly technically speaking.

Even as his antics become less appealing there is a sweet side to Kaufman behind which are displayed at his funeral and at Kaufman's big show at Carnegie hall. These two scenes Carrey makes Kaufman the man he dreamed to be which is a "song and dance man". Carrey brings such a life to these scenes even if that is quite ironic considering one of these scenes is after Kaufman's death. Carrey suggests a happiness lacking in the darker stunts played by Kaufman and honestly portrays Kaufman as a man who wishes to make other smiles. Both scenes work wonderfully because of how Carrey is able to convey a warmth while being entertaining as Andy finally leaves out his dreams. This is a great performance by Jim Carrey as he so fully inhabits every aspect of Kaufman's very complex personality. I would remark though that this could have have ranked among the all time great performances if the film dared just a little more. This is not a slight against Carrey he goes as far with the role as he possibly could in this film, I would like to have seen Carrey tackle what exactly made Kaufman the way he was though.