Showing posts with label 1960 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1960 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts

Tuesday, 20 January 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Chhabi Biswas in Devi

Chhabi Biswas did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Kalikinkar Roy in Devi.

Devi takes place in the home of a lord who begins to believe that his daughter in love may be the goddess that he worships. 

Previously on the obsessive characters of Chhabi Biswas, Jalsaghar followed him, also a wealthy man obsessed with music to the point of losing sight of everything around him, although a delusion one could argue was as much to do with his trauma as just perhaps his love of an art form. Said process is a little different in this film, in part, because Biswas’s character of Kalinkinkar Roy is a supporting role in the scheme of the film, although the film’s particular tapestry only leaves Sharmila Tagore as the young bride Doyamoyee, as her onscreen husband Umaprased Roy, played by Ray’s frequent collaborator Soumitra Chetterjee has a strong presence however he too comes in and out of the film. We find the elder Roy though from the open as a very specific sort of religious zealot and what Biswas’s performance is, is an articulation of the different forms this realizes itself in, within his relatively sparse, but impactful scenes. One of his earliest scenes is holding a ritual in front of his statue of the goddess where Biswas’s particular portrayal of devotion is beyond just faith or belief. There’s something deeply resolute in his eyes and more importantly a conviction that is clear obsession as he looks upon the statue as his whole life, not just an aspect of it, or just an important part of it that gives him meaning. When Biswas looks up to it we see Roy seeing everything that is of value to his reality in that statue, a fundamental anchor that will define this man going forward. 

We see as the elder Roy has a dream of Doyamoyee as his goddess and Biswas’s performance in the moment is a man captured by the fascination of the idea. Where we then find as he now accepts this as a simple truth to everything, Chhabi’s performance successfully brings this specific sense of a spiritual passion within the man that is never doubting and just pushing him through. Every delivery within his idea of pushing forth Doyamoyee as a reincarnation of his goddess is with the utmost belief and determination. Biswas portrays someone who firmly believes this and in that approach is convincing in creating this unlikely situation from occurring as this powerful man goes about fulfilling essentially his own prophecy. When his younger son is horrified to discover this, the Biswas’s performance as the elder Roy is a man beyond gone within his mania, to the point that he’s essentially singing the words to his son of how meaningful and how true his prophecy would be. Biswas’s performance is marvelous because as much as it is an expression of self-delusion essentially what he creates is a purity within it, where even the “singing” delivery is a man fully embodying every notion of the spirit he believes he’s captured by making Doyamoyee essentially this living altar. An altar going so far as to supposedly provide healing to the Elder Roy’s grandson, of Roy’s older son, until it no longer works and we see the end result. Biswas’s final scene is remarkable as we see the dejected man, because it is with the same intensity as we saw with his blind devotion that Biswas portrays the man’s broken faith in his crafted deity. Biswas doesn’t portray a specific moment of true self-reflection or clarity, rather the despondency he brings so palatably is within the same narrow focus, and intensity that created his prophecy in the first place. Biswas crafts a striking portrait of the progression and regression of a personalized zealotry. 

Sunday, 30 October 2016

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Results

5. Martin Stephens in Village of the Damned - Stephens gives an effectively creepy kid performance, though it feels but a warm up for his more impressive work in The Innocents a year later.

Best Scene: The kids tear down the "brick wall"
4. Robert Mitchum in Home From the Hill - Mitchum avoids falling into overblown melodrama by giving an unassuming yet commanding turn that successfully realizes the two conflicting sides of his character.

 Best Scene: The captain tries to win back his wife.
3. John Mills in Tunes of Glory - Mills gives perhaps his best performance, in his tragic portrayal of a soldier being slowly broken down by his own men.

Best Scene: The final party.
2. Peter Sellers in Never Let Go - Sellers more than proves his merit in a wholly dramatic role, through his compelling portrayal of a vicious and desperate criminal.

Best Scene: The final fight.
1. Renato Salvatori in Rocco and his Brothers - Salvatori gives a powerful performance as he realizes the descent of a simple man into a form of madness in chilling detail.

Best Scene: The Murder.
Overall Rank

Next Year: 2005 Lead

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Renato Salvatori in Rocco and His Brothers

Renato Salvatori did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Simone Parondi in Rocco and His Brothers.

Rocco and His Brothers tells the story of five brothers from a rural town trying to make new lives for themselves in the city of Milan.

Renato Salvatori plays the second oldest brother, who unlike the eldest brother Vincenzo, is new to the city life as the film opens. Salvatori portrays Simone in these early scenes as a man who was perhaps most suited for the life in the country where the family began. Salvatori manages to pull off the trick of playing a simple man without giving a simple performance. In the early scenes Salvatori offers a rather endearing presence as he portrays Simone as just an easy going sort. Salvatori brings an innate likability in this as he brings this optimism about Simone as the brothers try to get started. Salvatori importantly establishes just the way of Simone as he is very much a man of the moment. This happens to work as the brothers first enter Milan as they just try to get by with small jobs, still as a family unit. Salvatori makes Simone the life of the room in the right way as he shows a real earnestness as he goofs off slightly, but always in an encouraging humorous way for his brothers. Salvatori shows the right fun energy of just a man who lives in the time right in front of him.

Salvatori makes Simone a man who would have been perfect for a simple life, but that is not the nature of life in Milan. This is made readily apparent when the family is visited by a woman Nadia (Annie Girardot), who unknown to the brothers is a prostitute. Salvatori is great in this initial meeting by realizing so well the straight fascination in Simone at the sight of her. Salvatori in this moment shows absolutely no hidden motives in this, or even a lust exactly. It is a purer fascination at this moment, as Salvatori reflects this shyness in Simone of a man with a simple crush. This relationship though is changed when Simone finds success as a boxer in Milan, which acts as a short cut to success for him. Nadia decides to rope Simone along a little bit, though she has no serious intentions for him. Salvatori finds the tragic element in this treatment because he brings only a real earnestness once again, and reveals such pure joy when it seems she is interested in him, even though she's really not. Salvatori's performance echoes the important idea that Simone, is not ready for this sort of game, as he makes Simone's emotions absolutely pure.

The film takes a slight time jump after Simone's younger brother Rocco (Alain Delon) has served time in the army. In the time Nadia has moved on from Simone, and meets Rocco where they honestly connect. We find Simone again essentially ruined by the city, and as he finds Rocco with Nadia his descent only continues. What Salvatori does that's so remarkable with this performance, is that his transition is not a black and white shift, from endearing brother to the man he becomes. This is shown in the scene where Simone discovers Rocco and Nadia, and proceeds to beat his brother and then rapes Nadia. Salvatori makes this an especially disturbing scene because he does not make this a different man from before. Instead that same simplistic outlook is once again brought to Simone even in this act, as Salvatori makes the scene still about Simone failing to understand the complexity of the situation. The problem is in this case instead of merely being duped, Salvatori shows the frustration of the man as he lashes out. In the moment after the act Simone explains what he did, and Salvatori plays it as an older brother teaching his younger brother a lesson. Salvatori keeps the same earnest quality as before, still showing a simple man, but the problem is it is now attached to horrible behavior.

Rocco in his belief of family unity does not try to avenge Nadia, but rather encourages her to go back to Simone. In an act of desperation she does go back to him, which Simone is more than willing to accept. Again Salvatori never makes Simone a villain but is absolutely chilling by realizing this natural perversion of his older self as he fails to acclimate to his new environment. Salvatori's work establishes that Simone has not really learned anything from what he does, and is completely genuine as he attempts to show his love to the woman he previously brutalized. Simone's problems build up though as he not only fails to understand his relationship with Nadia, but also fails to comprehend the underbelly of Milan he gets involved with through his boxing career. Simone ends up in debt, and is the victim himself in the hands of those who choose to manipulate him further. There's a terrific scene for Salvatori as Simone goes to a man for help, and Salvatori presents him as a man who is completely lost in the situation. Simone eventually is exiled from Milan, where he once again finds Nadia who has returned to prostitution. It's an incredible scene for Salvatori as he portrays the mess that is Simone, as he gives us a man who is failing to deal with the trauma caused by their relationship. As Simone once again violently reacts in hate it is intertwined with a vicious attempt to love at the the same time, this hypocritical act Salvatori makes wholly convincing by suggesting the hate comes from his inability to understand how to express his love in the difficult circumstances. This is a brilliant performance by Renato Salvatori as he gives a powerful portrait of a simple man broken by a complex world he could never begin to understand.

Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Peter Sellers in Never Let Go

Peter Sellers did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Lionel Meadows in Never Let Go.

Never Let Go is crime film about a man, John (Richard Todd), who intends to prove his measure as a man by getting his stolen car back himself. The film has potentially interesting ideas along with a certain bit of style, but most aspects of the film are underwhelming in some way.

This film is one of the few strictly dramatic roles for Peter Sellers, and the only one I've ever seen anyways. Though there is a certain undercurrent of drama in both of his Stanley Kubrick collaborations, and Being There is firmly a dramedy. In those three films though there are plenty of moments where he is playing for laughs, there's not a single laugh to be had from him here, and that's not a knock against his performance. Sellers plays a career criminal Lionel Meadows who runs a garage that specializes in stealing the rebuilding cars. We briefly see Sellers in a silent moment early in the film as he's just going about this business, we do not see him again for a good twenty minutes before he reenters the film, after John has made considerable trouble for Lionel's business by refusing to let the theft of his stolen car go. Sellers shows up with a smile to talk to one his associates but he's not there to tell jokes.

Sellers's approach to the part with some adjustment the other way could easily be comedic performance, after all he gave a rather enjoyable turn as a similair type of criminal in The Ladykillers. Sellers though utilizes his approach, in creating a distinct accent and mannerisms, but uses them for an entirely alternative purpose here. Sellers plays Lionel almost as proper car salesman on the immediate outer surface. He seems to almost as brimming with a certain jovial quality, all the while keeping the proper posture of someone who is ready to sell you something special. Lionel though isn't there to give or even sell though, as he is in the taking business. His voice always attempting to be reassuring about something, the problem being that something is entirely unknown to both the person Lionel is talking to and Lionel himself. Now Sellers isn't portraying exactly quite facade, but is very intriguing in the way he more of presents this behavior as Lionel's attempt to exist as person in decent society at all.

The real Lionel is always right there too clawing to be set free, and Sellers suggests the whole act as the man trying to balance himself. The problem being is just being the razor thin surface is the criminal. Sellers though portrays Lionel as barely functioning criminal, presenting a man absolutely gripped with so much hate for everyone around him. Sellers is volcanic as he depicts the violence as something Lionel almost needs to come out, even though he has his thin attempt to hold it in check in some way. Sellers utilizes this brilliantly to create a real menace with his performance. He does not try to make Lionel as some sort of cunning mastermind. He rather bluntly instead makes him a man who just wants to continue to live as he currently does, and will lash out at anyone he thinks is getting in that way. Sellers is surprisingly intimidating in the part as he goes about attempting to plug the leaks in his organization, not as some refined hitman, but rather as a caged animal lashing out in rage. I'll admit there is something a little extra chilling about these scenes, as it is so unexpected to see Sellers not only commit the act but be convincing in the act.

One of the aspects of the film that is underwhelming is in the arc of the main character as he tries to find some personal pride through retrieving his car, but in doing so becomes involved in sordid elements. Todd tries but isn't able to overcome the limits of the writing. Sellers on the other hand, which almost seems like it wasn't written this way, gives a matching and more effective portrayal of Lionel attempting to hold onto his own pride, though that means a very different thing for him. Sellers even as he goes violently assaulting and accosting everyone who he thinks will implicate him in the crime, brings a real desperation in the act. He conveys this underlying fear of sorts in Lionel as he attempts to control the situation, though he is trying very hard to live up to be the man he thinks he should be. Sellers through this makes Lionel more than a one note hood, as he makes it rather fascinating as he reveals Lionel essentially going through the same thing as John just through a different perspective. In the final showdown between the two men you really feel what the moment means to Lionel because of Sellers's performance. In the fight Sellers shows exactly what Lionel is fighting for, in every wretched attack of his. I only wish the film itself, and Todd had managed to match Sellers's own work, since Seller's portrait of Lionel is rather special. It's such a shame that the film's tepid reception apparently made Sellers swear off taking dramatic roles, since this is a great performance that suggests we never got to truly see everything Sellers was capable of as an actor.

Monday, 24 October 2016

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Martin Stephens in The Village of the Damned

Martin Stephens did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying David Zellaby in The Village of the Damned.

The Village of the Damned is a fairly effective horror film about a group of strange children "miraculously" born in an English village all at the same time.

The film very much depends upon the potential creepiness of children through its monsters being a group of blond haired, light skinned, kids. Now their very image is off putting, particularly when they are all together, but a little more is needed that little more being Martin Stephens. Stephens plays the only one of the odd children who speaks. Stephens's speaks with an excessively articulation that is most off putting. Although it should be noted that they rerecorded Stephens's lines which makes his voice all the more disturbing since it seems partially detached from the image. Stephens's voice is incredibly creepy though since he does not make anything specifically monstrous about it. He instead delivers his lines as a proper English schoolboy, a too proper English schoolboy for sure, and the sophistication of his voice makes him seem truly alien.

Stephens's work goes beyond merely being the only one of the children who speaks. There is more tasked from Stephens as David also acts as the child who explains a bit of their intent, and philosophy of sorts to his "father" Gordon Zellaby (George Sanders). The philosophy being a maniacal lack of emotion, and Stephens is terrific in realizing this in his hollow expressions. He adds a bit more there within that as there is always an eerie contentment in his description as though the lack of concern is the better way to exist. The film never allows their exact intentions to be explained other than general survival. There is a sense of dread created though and Stephens contributes greatly to this. The soulless quality in David that Stephens brings so effectively suggests a terrible intent since there is such a clear lack of empathy for what surrounds them.

This is technically a one note performance for the most part, but that is exactly the point. Stephens is not playing a real boy but rather a creature in boy form. Stephens though makes the most out of that one note as he is absolutely menacing despite his rather unassuming frame. Stephens brings the demonic presence  to the part, and manages to make the eye glow scenes far more chilling than they would be otherwise. Now I wrote one note for the most part because at the very end of his performance there is a bit of emotion. It's just a brief second but Stephens's portrayal of David realizing he's made a terrible mistake is extremely satisfying due to his oh so consistent portrayal of David's contentment beforehand. This is a striking turn by Martin Stephens but I will say in the end this feels like a warmup. The warmup for his masterful turn as a "creepy kid" in the Innocents.

Saturday, 22 October 2016

Altenate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Robert Mitchum in Home From The Hill

Robert Mitchum did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Capt. Wade Hunnicutt in Home From the Hill.

Home From the Hill is a decent melodrama about a young man Theron (George Hamilton) who attempts to make something of himself but in doing so discovers the dark secrets his family holds.

Robert Mitchum plays the central figure that all the other characters revolve around in this film but he is not the lead. His lack of screentime and perspective make him a supporting character, though the story could not exist without Captain Wade Hunnicutt. The reason being everyone in his home, and the town around seems affected by the man in some way, usually in the negative sense. This is made clear in the film's opening scene where the Captain is shot by a man for having an affair with his wife. The Captain scoffs off both the man and the wound as though it happens all the time. The film builds up the character, mostly through exposition of both just how great the man is at first, then soon followed by how terrible he is. They make him into as though he is some sort of living legend and it is easy to see how this character would've wholly fallen flat with the wrong actor in the role. Luckily they cast Robert Mitchum.

Robert Mitchum is perfect for the part and he absolutely knows it through his ease onscreen throughout the film. Mitchum makes the reputation of the character earned since he seems rather larger than life himself. Mitchum just exudes the confidence of Hunnicutt as he should, as he suggests a man who has always gotten what has wanted but also always has taken what he has wanted. Mitchum though is able to do something essential for the part which is to create the idolization of the man that we see in his son. Mitchum effortlessly brings an undisputed charm about the man that actually comes in part in that confidence as he shows a man who is truly comfortable with himself. He even makes the opening scene work where he scoffs getting shot, as Mitchum successfully makes sense out of the moment by portraying him as a man completely comfortable with who he is to the point that he also wholly accepts the violent consequences of his actions.

A pivotal relationship in the film is the Captain's relationship with his wife (Eleanor Parker) who is bitter over his lecherous ways, and basically wants to keep her son away from the man's influence. Mitchum is excellent in the way he maneuvers scenes between the two of them. In the confrontational scenes Mitchum technically presents a very sleazy man as the Captain wears his transgressions with pride, however again the sheer power of his presence overrides this in a most curious way that only few actors could possibly get away with. Mitchum though also utilizes this approach to actually earn the other side of the relationship that we see a few times where the Captain attempts to win back his wife. The warmth that Mitchum brings suggests a genuine love for his wife and is convincing that he could ease any of her bitterness. What's so interesting about this is that Mitchum does not define these moments as lying, but still the Captain being a man who, for better or worse, is himself no matter what.

Eventually the Captain's son learns that one of their workers, Rafe (George Peppard), is in fact the Captain's bastard son, which leads to central conflict of the film, as the son's image of his father is shattered. The film is directed by Vincent Minnelli who in a few of his other efforts in similair stories does not exactly avoid over the top melodrama. Now it is easy to see where that could have come most strongly with the character of Captain Hunnicutt, but is avoided through Mitchum's work. As this point comes as his son demands answers, and the Captain still stands by his choices no matter what, Mitchum holds his ground. He stays in a measured work that's true to the way he set up the character. There is a moment where the Captain explains the refusal, as basically he gets to do what he wants, Mitchum is great in the moment because his portrayal makes it so the Captain simply stays with his personal resolve. This is a very strong performance from Robert Mitchum as his low key approach not only earns the two perspectives of the character but also successfully merges them as one man.

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: John Mills in Tunes of Glory

John Mills did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite receiving a BAFTA nomination and winning the Volpi Cup, for portraying Lieutenant Colonel Basil Barrow in Tunes of Glory.

John Mills's place in this film has a bit in common with his character in the film. In that as Colonel Basil Barrow, who is taking over command from Major Jock Sinclair (Alec Guinness), he should be the lead of the film and the man in charge. Unfortunately old Jock and Guinness insist on being the center of attention, and poor Colonel Barrow can't even quite make it as a co-lead since all his actions in the end relate to the way they effect Sinclair. That's in no way to dismiss Mills's performance though, as he has quite the challenge and thankless job to fulfill, much like the Barrow as he tries to clean up the rowdy unit he has taken on. I will admit that Mills is an actor, though more than reliable, often is overshadowed by his co-stars. That is technically the point of Barrow in the film as he's suppose to be overshadowed by Jock, but in a weird way Mills isn't actually overshadowed here. In fact he very much plays his part quite cleverly in the restricted margins.

In the early scenes of the film Mills effectively puts up the front of the proper leader who wants to get his regiment into shape, in a normal fashion. Mills does well to actually play into the thinness of this prospect as he does not portray a direct passion, rather he emphasizes just a man who wants things in order as they should be in a professional fashion. This earns the man little respect from most of the men, particularly not Jock who worked his way up to command after starting out as a boy in the regiment. Mills again is good in portraying the internalized exasperation of the man as he conveys the active effort of Barrow to stay on good terms with everyone, while attempting to lay down the law as a proper commander. The problems only continue as Jock's behavior only gets more out of control and the insubordination continues. Mills's performance works wonders as he reveals technically the man's fault as he does not press issues, but also a real earnestness as he shows only a man with the utmost respect for the regiment itself.

In the scene where Barrow reveals his own connection to the regiment, having been part of it the same year Jock was in prison for his usual drunken behavior, Mills reveals such a genuine passion in the man's words as he attempts to explain how important the regiment truly is. Mills is painful to watch, in a good way, in the moment because he has Barrow only reveal the truth as though he is talking to a trusted friend, yet Jock only continues to mock him when he learns Barrow was a POW in the war. Now this aspect of Barrow's past is especially well handled by Mills's performance. Mills never emphasizes in order to wholly reveal what his terrible prison time has done. Instead Mills wears it within Barrow as a man which again is a brilliant approach. Mills in doing so quietly reveals the trauma in his more intimate moments yet the wear the rest of the time seems to paint the man as though he does not quite have the needed confidence for a proper leader. Mills allows us to see the man while at the same time he presents the "coward" to Jock.

Jock forces a direct power struggle by hitting an enlisted man, an action that should lead to court martial but it is up to Barrow to initiate the charges. Again what's great about Mills's work is that he gives us everything while having Barrow only exude an indecisiveness towards the rest of the men. Mills gives us a man conflicted by his belief in the regiment and desire to hold true to the old guard, but again it only appears as weakness at a glance. Eventually Barrow decides to try to make truce with Jock, and again Mills is incredibly moving by bringing such honesty in the warmth he brings as man who only wants best for regiment. Jock claims to agree to support him but such support never materializes. This unfortunately also leads to any potential support to dry up since he did not court martial Jock when he should have. Mills is heartbreaking in the scene as he watches this betrayal, as the men mock his authority right in front of him. Mills wears the terrible anger and despair so effectively, that he makes Barrow's final actions merely seem an inevitability. It is the best performance I have seen by John Mills, as he matches Guinness's work not trying to go against him, but rather by working around him to craft a tragic portrait of soldier broken by his own men.

Sunday, 16 October 2016

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960

And the Nominees Were Not:

Peter Sellers in Never Let Go

Robert Mitchum in Home From the Hill

John Mills in Tunes of Glory

Martin Stephens in Village of the Damned

Renato Salvatori in Rocco and His Brothers

Thursday, 18 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Results

5. Gene Kelly in Inherit the Wind- Kelly plays with his type once again playing a loud showman, but this time with a deep rooted cynicism.

Best Scene: E.K. Hornbeck's cynicism is questioned by Drummond. 
4. Charles Laughton in Spartacus- Laughton gives a nice enjoyable performance that creates a believable portrait of a politician who uses quiet methods of persuasion.

Best Scene: Gracchus shares a meal with  Lentulus Batiatus.
3. Fred MacMurray in The Apartment- MacMurray is quite good in role giving a commanding presence that revels to just the right degree in his character immorality.

Best Scene: Sheldrake tries to bribe Baxter one more time. 
2. Laurence Olivier in Spartacus- Olivier as usual gives a great performance here as the main villain of the film. He is effectively a tremendous force of evil, but as well still creates a three dimensional character out of the tyrant that is his character.

Best Scene: Crassus tries to understand Varinia's love for Spartacus.
1. Eli Wallach in The Magnificent Seven- This was a very close one for me, and yes I was ready to give Olivier by lead and supporting for this year. Wallach though is equally excellent in his role in the Magnificent Seven, and manages to do basically anything he possibly could with his role. Even with his role being very limited Wallach never makes it feel that way giving an extremely entertaining as well as being appropriately menacing as well.

Best Scene: Calvera's introduction. 
Overall Rank:
  1. Eli Wallach in The Magnificent Seven
  2. Laurence Olivier in Spartacus
  3. Peter Sellers in Never Let Go
  4. Peter Falk in Murder, Inc.
  5. Peter Ustinov in Spartacus
  6. John Mills in Tunes of Glory
  7. Chhabi Biswas in Devi
  8. Masayuki Mori in When a Woman Ascends the Stairs
  9. Masayuki Mori in The Bad Sleep Well  
  10. Robert Mitchum in Home From the Hill
  11. Fred MacMurray in The Apartment
  12. Shin Saburi in Late Autumn
  13. Ryuji Kita in Late Autumn
  14. Nabuo Nakamura in Late Autumn
  15. Steve McQueen in The Magnificent Seven
  16. James Coburn in The Magnificent Seven
  17. Peter Ustinov in The Sundowners
  18. Roger Livesey in The Entertainer
  19. Takeshi Kato in The Bad Sleep Well
  20. Charles Laughton in Spartacus
  21. Sal Mineo in Exodus
  22. Tatsuya Nakadai in When a Woman Ascends the Stairs
  23. Martin Stephens in The Village of the Damned
  24. James Mason in The Trials of Oscar Wilde
  25. Ralph Richardson in Oscar Wilde
  26. Michel Constantin in Le Trou
  27. Raymound Meunier in Le Trou
  28. Jean Keraudy in Le Trou
  29. Philippe Leroy in Le Trou
  30. Woody Strode in Spartacus 
  31. André Bervil in Le Trou
  32. Michael Craig in The Angry Silence 
  33. Richard Attenborough in The League of Gentlemen 
  34. Max Cartier in Rocco and His Brothers
  35. Spiros Focas in Rocco and Brothers
  36. Tatsuya Mihashi in The Bad Sleep Well 
  37. Alan Bates in The Entertainer 
  38. Enrique Lucero in Macario
  39. Bryan Forbes in The League of Gentlemen
  40. Geoffrey Keen in The Angry Silence 
  41. Roger Livesey in The League of Gentlemen 
  42. Jack Nicholson in The Little Shop of Horrors
  43. Gene Kelly in Inherit the Wind
  44. Arthur Kennedy in Elmer Gantry 
  45. Nigel Patrick in The League of Gentlemen
  46. Martin Balsam in Psycho 
  47. Bernard Lee in The Angry Silence 
  48. Daisuke Kato in When a Woman Ascends the Stairs
  49. Takashi Shimura in The Bad Sleep Well
  50. Trevor Howard in Sons and Lovers
  51. Paolo Stoppa in Rocco and his Brothers
  52. Robert Coote in The League of Gentlemen
  53. Hume Cronyn in Sunrise at Campobello
  54. Herbert Lom in Spartacus
  55. Jack Kruschen in The Apartment 
  56. Norman Bird in The League of Gentlemen
  57. Maurice Ronet in Purple Noon
  58. Ray Walston in The Apartment 
  59. John Mills in Swiss Family Robinson 
  60. Ed Wynn in Cinderfella
  61. Dennis Price in Tunes of Glory 
  62. Michael Gwynn in Village of the Damned
  63. Harry Morgan in Inherit the Wind 
  64. Brad Dexter in The Magnificent Seven
  65. David Lewis in The Apartment
  66. Albert Finney in The Entertainer
  67. Richard Conte in Ocean's Eleven
  68. Adam Faith in Never Let Go
  69. Andre Checchi in Black Sunday 
  70. Laurence Harvey in The Alamo
  71. Charles Bronson in The Magnificent Seven 
  72. John Neville in Oscar Wilde
  73. Laurence Naismith in Village of the Damned
  74. Tony Curtis in Spartacus
  75. Richard Widmark in The Alamo 
  76. Robert Vaughn in The Magnificent Seven 
  77. Dick York in Inherit the Wind
  78. John Wayne in The Alamo
  79. Alan Young in The Time Machine 
  80. Alexandre Rignault in Eyes Without a Face 
  81. Billie Kearns in Purple Noon
  82. Dennis Weaver in The Gallant Hours
  83. Miles Malleson in Peeping Tom
  84. Katamari Fujimara in The Bad Sleep Well 
  85. Ivo Garrani in Black Sunday 
  86. Joseph Wiseman in The Unforgiven 
  87. Cesar Romero in Ocean's Eleven  
  88. Cecil Parker in Swiss family Robinson
  89. John Fraser in The Trials of Oscar Wilde
  90. Francois Guerin in Eyes Without A Face 
  91. Nigel Davenport in Peeping Tom 
  92. George Peppard in Home from the Hill
  93. Albert Salmi in The Unforgiven
  94. Horst Buchholz in The Magnificent Seven
  95. Ko Nishimura in The Bad Sleep Well 
  96. Everett Sloane in Home from the Hill
  97. Charles Bickford in The Unforgiven
  98. John Dall in Spartacus
  99. Dean Jagger in Elmer Gantry
  100. Sammy Davis Jr. in Ocean's Eleven
  101. Dean Martin in Ocean's Eleven 
  102. Edward Chapman in Oscar Wilde
  103. Michael Anderson in The Sundowners
  104. Akim Tamrioff in Ocean's Eleven 
  105. Sessue Hayakawa in Swiss Family Robinson
  106. Chill Wills in The Alamo
  107. John Ireland in Spartacus
  108. John Gavin in Psycho
  109. John Gavin in Spartacus
  110. Kevin Corcoran in Swiss Family Robinson 
  111. Paul Lukather in Dinosaurus!
  112. Claude Akins in Inherit the Wind
  113. Vladimir Sokoloff in The Magnificent Seven
  114. Alan Roberts in Dinosaurus!
  115. The Rest of the Villagers in The Magnificent Seven
Next Year: 1999 Supporting 

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Fred MacMurray in The Apartment

Fred MacMurray did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jeff D. Sheldrake in The Apartment.

Fred MacMurray despite portraying three important roles in best picture nominees like Double Indemnity, The Caine Mutiny, and best picture winner The Apartment he was never nominated. This is particularly odd for the latter two since he was not nominated in favor of actors in far smaller simpler roles who gave far less impressive performances. I suppose one could say perhaps the snub came from the lowly nature of his character compared to Jack Kruschen's, but that would be hard to say since in the same year they nominated Peter Falk, and Peter Ustinov who played a hit man and a slave holder respectively.

Perhaps what really hurt MacMurray though was that what he was good at was too problematic. MacMurray in most of his less famous roles portrayed usually kindly likable fellows, here and his other darker turns he does not entirely refute his other performance even though he is playing despicable characters. MacMurray even in this role as the amoral womanizing insurance executive still has the same sort of Fred MacMurray charm, yet he brilliantly redirects here to show it being used to troubling end. Although Sheldrake is a very reprehensible sort, MacMurray portrays the part through the film showing that he either does not care or is not aware how bad of a person he is.

Fred MacMurray carries the part excellently as he makes the command of Sheldrake entirely believable in both the business sense and the personal sense. In the business sense Sheldrake pushes everyone around in the office apparently, and gets his way doing so. MacMurray with his sly grin, and his casual but no nonsense approach fully controls the scenes he is in during the early parts of the film. MacMurray equally is effective in his scenes with Shirley MacLaine. He makes the affair believable because again there is a certain charm in his performance and even a dominance in his performance that makes it so the affair can actually be believed. 

Sheldrake is a constant in the film though in that he never changes really in tone, or even in his own sense of morality. When he does something that hurts someone else MacMurray portrays as only interested to a point of pure selfishness. Even when his actions hurt himself there is no change portrayed by MacMurray, but MacMurray entirely earns the lack of change. MacMurray is steadfast in making Sheldrake the unrepentant selfish jerk he should be. There is nothing learned, when something does go wrong MacMurray portrays it as only an internal annoyance for Sheldrake, that he only really cares about how it harms him. MacMurray plays the part straight and works just as it should for the part, and the film as a whole.

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Gene Kelly in Inherit the Wind

Gene Kelly did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying E.K. Hornbeck in Inherit the Wind.

Gene Kelly's on screen performances for the most part are very similar. They are basically only slight variations on the performance that he gave in his Oscar nominated performance in Anchors Aweigh. Kelly though plays a far more dramatic role here as the news paper writer who comes to town to cover the story of a teacher put on trial for teaching evolution in the classroom. Kelly portrays Hornbeck who is based on H.L. Mencken, who was interestingly also the basis for Arthur Kennedy's character in Elmer Gantry, although his character in that film is given a little less focus than Kelly here.

Kelly plays his part as a cynical showman, and actually he uses well his usual screen persona well refuting it in a way at the same time. He of course as the same voice, and one could argue almost the same delivery as in his musicals as Hornbeck, but with Hornbeck there is always an underlying deep rooted cynicism that always prevails. Kelly infuses every line he has with a great deal of enthusiasm and well showmanship, but below everything that he says there is always an unmistakable amount of venom within it.

This is a fairly limited role for Kelly actually after his speeches early in the film he mostly just has a quick reaction that only ever is brief, which is especially true in the court room scenes where he takes a back seat. That is not to say Kelly is forgotten, and he is good in coming in whenever he can bringing about the sharp wit of his character very well. He does not do a great deal though more until the end when Spencer Tracy's character questions his cynicism. Kelly is quite good in this scene as he shows Hornbeck feign any feelings of self-doubt, and quickly go back to his old ways. This is a pretty simple, Kelly does play it well though, and it shows that he had more in him than the Gene Kelly musical character.

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Laurence Olivier in Spartacus

Laurence Olivier did not receive an Oscar nomination although he did receive a globe nomination for portraying Crassus in Spartacus.

Crassus is the main villain of the film a powerful Roman military commander who tries to seize all the power in Rome. He is a powerful man who tries to manipulate all to get the power he desires. Laurence Olivier here takes on the part with a forceful presence. He is very different from Laughton's Gracchus in that Olivier shows that Crasssus is one who directly forces his will on another through his own incredible force of will, something Olivier is simply incredible at doing. In every scene that he is in Olivier leaves not questions to who the commanding presence is, he is always controlling in almost every way as Crassus.

Olivier conveys especially well the pompous superiority in Crassus, that almost never ceases, especially since he is never truly defeated in the film. Even though Crassus repeatedly claims that he is a Roman true and true, and his passion for Rome comes from his own heritage as a patrician, Olivier is keen in showing that really his since of honor is entirely about himself. Olivier is terrific because he tells both a lie and the truth when telling others about his belief in Rome, and his love of his heritage. Olivier appropriately puts the conviction that makes it believable to all others would buy his sentiment, but Olivier brilliantly in his eyes suggests the truth that Crassus only cares of himself. 

As a villain Olivier is excellent in portraying the brutal intelligence of Crassus quietly. He is able to create the brilliant strategist that is Crassus in both quiet and louder moments. In the louder moments he is the dominate personality that makes Crassus a true dictator who has absolute sway. In the quieter moments Olivier never fails to still pull you in with a great intensity. In the final battle scene for example Olivier almost barely moves but nevertheless the intelligence, conviction, and even is brutality is all shown in Olivier's pronounced and unwavering expression.  He make Crassus simply a force that is not to be reckoned, Olivier actually makes Spartacus's eventual defeat an inevitability.

Now importantly Olivier never plays Crassus as just a one dimensional evil tyrant, he certainly portrays him as an evil tyrant but never a one note one. Olivier does this best in the scenes where he interacts with Spartacus's love interest and later wife Varinia (Jean Simmons). Olivier who so perfectly showed the power of the man in the political arena now just as effectively portrays the weakness of the man in the personal arena. Olivier is astounding as he honestly brings to light the pain in Crassus over his inability to understand how she can love Spartacus and not him. It is a entirely genuine struggle and fear in Crassus that Olivier conveys within Crassus over her inability to love him in that same way.

This is just a brilliant performance from the great Olivier. He only succeeds in the role of Crassus creating a fascinating villain that can't help but be a villain. One of my favorite moments of this performance is when Crassus is trying to woo Varinia, and he threatens his child. Olivier plays it so wonderfully because he doesn't pile on the menace like Crassus is just trying to be evil, no instead he does it entirely casually as if Crassus do to his life as a Roman can't help but be evil. This is a terrific work by Olivier as he masterfully creates Crassus into an overpowering villain, and he never once fails to be the worthy adversary needed for the film, but just as well always succeeds in making Crassus a three dimensional character as well as a villain.

Monday, 15 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Charles Laughton in Spartacus

Charles Laughton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Gracchus in Spartacus.

Charles Laughton portrays Gracchus the powerful Roman senator who is described as the head of the mob. He stands as the most powerful opponent to the wannabe dictator Crassus (Laurence Olivier), but he himself is not exactly opposed to certain vices like making somewhat shady deals to get his ends.Watching the film once again I must say that I ended up being a little less impressed by Laughton and more impressed with Peter Ustinov who Laughton appears in many scenes with. I must say in fact I upped Ustinov to a 4 and he now stands second place out of the nominees.

Laughton though is certainly is usually enjoyable self in the role of Gracchus bringing his usual sly manner and wit to the part that is fitting for Gracchus who is constantly playing the politics within Rome to try get what he wants. Laughton makes Gracchus a likable, quietly charming sort, although he effectively inserts the technically unsavory qualities of his character in the usual Laughton style. He is an enjoyable character when he is on screen and his scenes with Ustinov are particularly entertaining as the two play off of each other splendidly.

Laughton is properly believable though in the scenes of the political fighting. Laughton takes the opposite approach to Olivier in that he shows that Gracchus moves to get his way through indirect manner. He does not push his personality on the others rather Laughton shows a far more calm sort of charisma that shows the presence and strength of Gracchus in the political setting well. He creates an interesting contrast with the forceful performance by Olivier, and makes their scenes where they go head to head quite powerful.

This is not quite an incredible performance by Charles Laughton but it is most certainly is a good one. Laughton makes Gracchus a worthy opponent to Olivier's Crassus. He as well creates some of the most entertaining moments in the film through his fun scenes with Ustinov that are work especially well. This is a worthy performance that adds well to his film working well to make the political aspects of the story just as  if not more interesting than the slave revolt.  

Sunday, 14 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960: Eli Wallach in The Magnificent Seven

Eli Wallach did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Calvera in The Magnificent Seven.

The Magnificent Seven although holds a certain entertainment value certainly is flawed, and inferior to the Seven Samurai.

I actually considered doing all of the supporting six of the Magnificent seven as one group of reviews, but I thought I could just handle them at the the beginning of this review. Steve McQueen shows conviction with every line whether they deserve them or not, and is quite good in his usual way. James Coburn probably is my favorite of the seven even though, or perhaps because he has the simplest role, but he is great at being the stoic bad ass of the group. Aside from McQueen and Coburn the other four all of their little human stories to go with them for better or worse.

Charles Bronson and Brad Dexter are decent even if they are saddled down by dealing far too much with terrible actors supporting their stories. Robert Vaughn has perhaps the most baity role actually, in that he most certainly has the traditional "Oscar scene". Vaughn actually is fine at being quietly uneasy throughout, but his big break down scene doesn't really work even though again he has to deal with terrible supporting actors for the scene. Vaughn does not really earn the scene enough, but I suppose it probably would have been better if he was not supported in such an awful fashion.

Horst Buchholz technically speaking is almost lead as he is sort of playing the Toshiro Mifune role, although Vaughn sort of elements of his role as well, but the role is truncated and heavily changed from the original. Buchholz certainly gives it a try, he is no Mifune, but he is also no Steve McQueen when it comes to conviction and likability. Buchholz just does not make his character of Chico very endearing. He unfortunately becomes actually rather annoying. In fact his performance is the least effective of the six supporting heroes, even though he might actually get the most time individually.

The Magnificent Seven certainly has many reasons why it is inferior to The Seven Samurai. Kurosawa's film is very much a director's film and through his direction he avoid many of the flaws in this version. For example there is far too much on the villagers who are the awful supporting actors I referred to. This version also suffers through clunky philosophical dialogue, and even though there is greater emphasis on the performances in this version for the most part most of the actors do not capitalize on this fact. The Magnificent Seven must be given its due in two points though it has a great score, and a far more memorable villain than the original film.

Apparently Wallach originally wanted the role which was going to be the Toshiro Mifune equivalent character, but ended up being wanted for the role of the leader of the bandits Calvera. Wallach apparently only would take the role if he was allowed to have Calvera look like a man who actually spent his money from his thievery, and this request of Wallach is a great indication to the fact that he refuses to ever allow Calvera to be just a throw away villain. Wallach takes the role that could have been absolutely forgettable, and seeks to make the most of him even with the little time he is actually given.

Wallach in his opening scene brings a great deal of fun and style into the role. In the scene Calvera goes on about telling the village about how he will steal their crops, and their is not anything they can do about it. Wallach is very entertaining in this scene having a certain charm even while carrying the underlying threat perfectly. Wallach takes on the role with such naturalism actually, he does not play Calvera with anger until Calvera would actually get angry. Wallach has a joy here as Calvera tells the people about how he sees the world. Wallach with ease honestly turns Calvera into an actual person first as there is no reason he should be constantly evil.

When Calvera does kill one of the villagers Wallach plays it out brilliantly he does not laugh or enjoy killing in any way. Instead Wallach more realistically portrays Calvera being frustrated with indignation to the villagers for forcing him to kill him. Wallach makes a great first impression and really there could not be more that one would want from a character like this that Wallach gives. To be absolutely truthful Wallach does not make one dread the return of the bandits as one might thing, but the only thing the return of the bandits means more of Wallach's performance as Calvera.

Wallach in all of his appearances manages to liven the screen with his presence, stealing every scene that he is in completely through the great style he brings to part. Every moment and every line delivery he never leaves simple, and makes Calvera a truly entertaining villain. Due to the fact that he never focuses on the menace, Wallach actually creates a far greater impact when the more intense side to Calvera does come out. This is simply just an expert depiction of villain where Wallach does far more than the part required, which perhaps is best shown in his death scene.

Throughout his performance Wallach brilliantly added touches of a certain underlying philosophy in Calvera, that brought about his actions in the film. He lightly portrays the quiet sense of superiority Calvera feels over the villagers that leaves him flabbergasted over the Seven's repeated attempts at helping them. Wallach is simply marvelously as he honestly portray the lack of understanding Calvera has for their heroic actions, particularly in his death scene. Wallach almost allows us to sympathize with Calvera for a moment because he truthfully portrays the moment of disbelief than realization without fault. An incredible performance by Wallach only held back by the limitations of the part, but Wallach shows exactly how a great actor can make the most out of any part.

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1960

And the Nominees Were Not:

Fred MacMurray in The Apartment 

Eli Wallach in The Magnificent Seven

Charles Laughton in Spartacus


Laurence Olivier in Spartacus

Gene Kelly in Inherit The Wind