Tuesday, 17 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: Jesse Plemons in Bugonia

Jesse Plemons did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for SAG and BAFTA, for portraying Teddy Gatz in Bugonia. 

Bugonia follows a conspiracy theorist who kidnaps a powerful CEO Michelle Fuller (Emma Stone) because he believes she is an alien. 

The last time I reviewed Jesse Plemons it was also for a Yorgos Lanthimos film where he successfully found his away around the peculiar nature of pure, as in written and directed, style of Lanthimos without being lost within the direction through three different vignettes in Kinds of Kindness. Plemons returns to work with him again, once again with Emma Stone, though this time to portray a directed but written by someone else Lanthimos, which always results in a different kind of film. It is still a dark comedy as all of Lanthimos is, however the comedy of this darkness isn’t without the detached alien world of pure Lanthimos, which affords an even greater opportunity for the actor who seems to be a favorite among so many talented filmmakers. Plemons here gets to play the role of Teddy Gatz who we follow in the opening of the film as he is emotionally preparing his co-conspirator, though an unfortunate follower is probably a better description, Don (Aidan Delbis). Plemons is a master of the tone for this film, which while sharing some of the DNA is no way a copy of Kind and Kindness and in many ways trickier because there’s more emotional depth allowed. Plemons in the opening scenes is amazing in his particular delivery where it isn’t exactly monotone, but almost pseudo professional as he goes about telling Don all the “truths” he knows. Although it is darkly comic, Plemons is also though convincing in not playing it with the strictest purity of that spirit. There is the sense of the drive to convince Don and maybe even a bit of the insecurity of bringing Don within this mission even as he speaks with that particular form of conviction. The key moments being when Don asks follow-up questions, and Plemons shows that Teddy stumbles more than with his monologues. I especially love the moment where Don asks if two random people are aliens, and Plemons’s essentially “oh no not them, but they’re lost” is such an artful combination of someone being shaken off their false rhythm then creating the strange momentum of trying to make any kind of recovery within the sentiment. It isn’t that Plemons plays that Teddy is lying, however his convictions are representative of an emotional mess of a mind trying to create some kind of truth as he sees it. 

Teddy and Don successfully kidnap Michelle and bring her back to Teddy’s remote and ramshackle house as a prison for the woman he believes to be an alien. Plemons’s amazing in this scene where with Don there was more of hesitation in some aspects of the conversation, despite being mixed with his strange conviction, here it is with an eerie conviction that is quite startling while also being quietly comical. Plemons’s masterful in the exact delivery he is able to find as he explains to Michelle that he had to cut off her hair in order to prevent her from contacting her ship. Plemons’s eyes capture such an unnerving mania in the moment because within those eyes we see the assertiveness that Teddy does fine when presenting it directly to Michelle. An assertiveness that will speak to more things than that, but in the opening of this conversation between the two the cold exactness of every word that Plemons brings is disturbing within the specificity of that conviction. Maybe he does have doubts related to Don but when with Michelle and directed at Michelle Plemons shows a man with a purpose, a completely demented purpose it would seem. There’s one line in particular that Plemons colors a certain way, a color that you don’t know about the first time but is chilling the second. Which is noting that “they all” deny being an alien but admit it eventually. That line has an absolute certainty in Plemons’s performance more than anything else and within that certainty he is at his most disturbing, which we later find out why he is so particularly certain that someone kidnapped by him will admit to being an alien. Plemons tells a fundamental truth about Teddy in this moment though we won’t know what this truth means precisely until much later in the film. 

We see Teddy occasionally outside of the situation directly where Plemons is also incredible in how much he does with a little at times, as really just the way he silently rides his bike a few times throughout the film is a bit of a showcase on how to do a whole lot in a performance in a theoretically simple situation. Yet the specific lack of normalcy and more readily this directed purpose of his performance in these scenes reinforces Teddy as a man with a mission, although not a mission most would consider let alone sign up for. I love Plemons even in some incidental moments such as when he’s talking with a coworker, “acting natural”, which for Teddy he never quite can act natural. But Plemons is rather fascinating when he advises a worker to get compensation for their injury and even says that things are going to change in their world soon. Plemons’s exact delusion is just so brilliantly spoken in every word because there’s this quiet unearned pride in his delivery as he eagerly presents himself to the other person essentially as a hero with a plan he can’t quite reveal to her yet. Teddy unfortunately for his plan is also frequently pestered by a local deputy sheriff Boyd (Stavros Halkias) who was also a former babysitter for Teddy. In each of these scenes they share, Plemons manages to thread a needle while playing the more surface note. The sort of quiet intensity in his eyes in these moments, the short delivery of every response as “let’s get this over with it”, speaks to a criminal not wanting to speak to the police, however Plemons puts just a bit more emotion and intensity into both of these where there feels the personal direction. Where one can sense that Teddy’s issues with Boyd go even further than just wanting to keep his kidnapping of Michelle a secret. 

Where Plemons very much excels in bringing the seemingly demented state of Teddy alive so effectively where this takes on even greater heights is bringing in what I fundamentally always appreciate in not-written-by Lanthimos, which is raw emotion. An aspect we are introduced in part, which honestly is some of my favorite radical cinematic imagery from 2025, where we see the past through the Teddy filter where his mom is literally floating within a coma due to the drug treatment by Michelle’s company. Once again outstanding silent work from Plemons, in fact if we were just giving an award for a single facial expression Plemons would be a tough one to beat with how much he does with his facial expression in the flashback. As Plemons is able to show a younger man, a more naive man, a more emotionally broken man in a pure sense where you are granted a degree of the real pain and most of all just this state of a being absolutely lost in the world as in his mind he’s literally holding onto his dying mother like a balloon. That fundamental grief is what we see fuels Teddy more than anything and this is what Plemons runs with in this performance, particularly as we get to a scene between Teddy, Michelle and Don as they dine together. Michelle plays her hand noting that she does remember Teddy and his mother. Plemons is just altogether amazing as we see in his eyes and his expression building volcanic anger in Teddy. In every moment she speaks to him about her mother, Plemons, despite playing such a bent character, honestly is even moving because he shows just the raw unmitigated grief that is just bubbling under the surface in Teddy for every second that Michelle mentions his mother’s name. Plemons so powerfully builds to every second before wholly earning the animalistic rage that takes over as Michelle’s words lead him to literally run across a table and physically attack her. 

The mess of the kidnapping becomes more rabid when Don begins to have more doubts, particularly when Teddy “tests” her by electrocuting her to get “readings”. A fascinating scene however, and one again where Plemons alludes to more than we know about Teddy though in a different arena, when he apologizes to Michelle because the “readings” note her as of royal alien lineage. Plemons’s words of reverence towards her are real and authentic as anything else he’s done and again the conviction in his eyes speaks to more than just someone saying whatever nonsense comes to their head next, there’s genuine belief there. Complicating things further is Deputy Boyd’s appearance at the house, who essentially reveals to having sexually abused Teddy when he was younger, something that is already apparent within even just Plemons’s physical work around him where he is looking away and down and out like a dog who was beaten too many times. Taken even further though when Boyd is alerted to something when Don kills himself with a shotgun, leading Teddy to stun Boyd with his bees before beating him to death with a shovel. The emotion behind that shovel beat down again made more than just a man getting rid of an obstacle rather you see Boyd as a true fixation of Teddy’s hatred. Plemons at this point somehow taking an already extreme emotional state and going further with it in a most impressive display, as Plemons’s reaction to Don’s death is filled with real emotional devastation where he is able to contain within the mess of Teddy’s mind fear, and anger towards how the situation has gone along with hints of genuine shame in culpability nagging at the back of his mind. 

Michelle is able to get Teddy to leave by essentially telling him to poison his own mother with antifreeze by telling him it is in fact a formula that will cure her. A totally insane prospect that Plemons honestly sells through every bit of his physical and verbal life where he shows a man basically mangled by his life and his plan as he rushes to enact Michelle’s fix. Where Plemons is particularly amazing is as totally insane of a situation as Teddy poisons his own mother leading to her death, the raw emotion of Teddy’s grief is absolutely real. Plemons delivers real heartbreak of the tragedy even as he presents a totally deranged person he presents that core of a real man that came to this place. A fascinating element as Plemons manages to ground the character Teddy even as he is so successful in presenting the extremes of him at the same time. An element that is pivotal in his final sequence of the film when Michelle, having discovered that Teddy is in fact a serial killer who killed many other people and “aliens” explaining his previous use of they when talking about his victims admitting their alien, Michelle then readily admits, seemingly, that she is an alien, however she presents this in a confrontational dominating way. Plemons is wholly convincing in his reaction now as someone lost but gripping onto the only reality he can know which is the one Michelle is presenting so ruthlessly to him. Plemons brings this penetrating fear in his reactions to every one of her cutting words even as he’s the one still holding the gun, believably conveying this apologetic tone to the alien in the same vein as his previous reverence. Michelle offers Teddy a trip to the mothership to negotiate, and Plemons is outstanding throughout the sequence. As he carries the underlying tension of the man still holding the hostage and still being very much dangerous in the situation as he and Michelle very conspicuously move towards her office. He also brings in the conflicting elements of his derangements, bringing even genuine warmth when asking if Don can come to the ship as well, despite being dead, but also a brilliantly realized combination of doubts. Plemons is able to create this convincing smear of emotions as there are moments where it seems like Teddy is most doubting the ideas as he’s closest to it, while also being extremely nervous at the notion of actually essentially coming face to face with his foes. Plemons not being vague but rather very particular in creating so convincingly this wholly broken state of a man as he’s at his least assured when theoretically he’s nearest to his final goal. In case the rest of the review didn’t make it clear I adore every moment of this performance which is out on a limb and thrives for every second of it. Plemons is masterful because he does sell the darkest of comedy, the most extreme bits of madness a human can muster, yet does so in a way where there is a deeply human core to all of it that manages to be both heartbreaking and bone chilling. 

Monday, 16 February 2026

RIP Robert Duvall

It sadly was around this time last year that I had to make a post for one of the other greats of the 70's Gene Hackman. Although like Hackman both really came up before then making an impression in small roles before breaking out fully as a leading men. Duvall quite frankly having one of the most amazing debuts in terms of leaving a cinematic impression with Boo Radley in To Kill a Mockingbird, as that truly remarkable character introduction wasn't just the memorable reveal for that film but a reveal of someone who would become an essential cinematic talent. Duvall who would sweep through such unforgettable films of cinema such as The Godfathers, the Conversation, Apocalypse Now, and Network, always adding his talent and realizing the strength or elevating the nature of his material. Always being a reliable presence where so often it was the ease of his performances that were the key. Where Duvall simply said the truth in so many different roles and films. Where even if the film was faulty, Duvall always could be depended on to bring something authentic through his presence. Shame we will never have that comfort of the dependability of a given Duvall performance again, but certainly will always appreciate how much of his talent he shared with us over the years. 

Sunday, 15 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: Dylan O'Brien in Twinless

Dylan O’Brien did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Rocky and Roman in Twinless. 

Twinless follows two men who meet in a support group for twins who have lost their siblings. 

That is the theoretical setup and spoiler alert right away that is fashioned as a false start for the film on purpose by writer/director and co-lead James Sweeney as Dennis, a man who claims to have a dead twin in order to meet Roman the twin of the man he had a brief romantic fling with Rocky. Dylan O’Brien obviously plays both brothers, an actor who thankfully, as I’ll always celebrate an upswing for a performer,  has steadily grown in my estimation in the past few years. As he started for me as a bit of a non-entity performer until I found him a decent likable lead in Love & Monsters, then was impressed by his take on a young Dan Aykroyd in Saturday Night with an even greater step up here in the twin roles.  The briefer of the two being Rocky which O’Brien’s work very much works in contrast to Roman who meet technically first though second chronologically and O’Brien excels in creating that contrast. His performance as Rocky is technically working within the frame of generalized traits of a homosexual character, however an instance where this approach does wholly work. The big reason why not only does O’Brien make even the certain flamboyance within his physical manner and voice feel natural to the character he also makes it extend within the overarching traits of the character. The traits being that character’s popularity and confidence. Where O’Brien carries that so innately and you get the sense of the almost breezy approach to life where Rocky can casually approach every relationship, even dealing with the result of ghosting, O’Brien brings a callous but also carefree reaction of someone who just knows he’ll be able to charisma his way out of it. O’Brien convincingly created the “legend” of Rocky as the brother who is so self-assured and seemed to be walking on air…well until being accidentally run over during the confrontation by Dennis. 

O’Brien’s work as Roman then is the “other” brother and O’Brien performance is distinctive in creating a combination of elements in Roman. His whole manner is of the submissive second combined with someone also being a bit lost in his grief and losing his twin. O’Brien has a natural sullen manner he realizes and even more so archives the difficulty which is managing to play a not particularly bright character in a way that doesn’t fall into easy stereotype. O’Brien finds a convincing delay in his speech and manner of someone who just has to think about everything with a bit more time and a little harder to get anywhere. Combined with a convincing sense of the emotional state of someone just a bit lost in life. O’Brien finds an emotional nuance because he’s able to convey the shy, almost beaten down state of being told his whole life that his brother is better, while also able to create genuine empathy for the character who really is lost and without purpose as he’s not with his brother for any kind of guidance. He makes it convincing when Dennis approaches him lying about his own brother in a strange form of trying to continue the relationship with Rocky by spending time with the not at all homosexual Roman. O’Brien excels though in the quiet warmth he gets just from seeming to have some kind of sounding board of any kind, combined though with the general sloppiness of the person. Such as when Roman even says some potentially insensitive questions and statements about homosexuals, O’Brien is able to deliver them with a convincing naivety of someone who truly just doesn't really know how to speak for himself. 

Within the relationship O’Brien is very effective in showing this quiet bit of growth in the relationship with Dennis, but just eking out this believable sense of Roman coming a bit out of his battered shell which unfortunately for Dennis leads him to connect to Dennis's coworker Marcie (Aisling Franciosi). Dennis tries to push his fantasy continually on Roman, and again a lot of these scenes wouldn’t work at all if not for how convincing O’Brien is in the role. The setups where Dennis basically wants to touch Roman potentially suggestively shouldn’t work, but O’Brien is so convincing in the certain simplicity of Roman that in his slightly confused but passively accepting manner he convinces you that Roman would allow Dennis to touch his feet…up until a point when Dennis tries to suck on them. Even then O’Brien reactions are less straight anger but rather naturally weaved in with confusion before Dennis admits to his whole deception. Where again O’Brien’s performance is key to the resolution of the entire film because even in his violent reaction the fundamental choice is that of an instinctual reaction of a man who takes things very much on the surface and the reaction is a betrayal of the man’s nature to be so trusting. An extension of this with his relationship with Marcie where the two of them mostly just work as two people loving each other in their mutual simplicity in a way. The only break in Roman letting out his frustrations with the situation with Dennis and Rocky, again as just very genuine frustrations of someone who really doesn’t even know how to broach someone trying to trick him. O’Brien makes this feel so natural just as natural as his wholly earnest apology to her when she calls him on his anger. O’Brien’s realization of the nature of Roman is honestly the only thing that at all earns the ending of Dennis and Roman becoming friends through it all. As O’Brien throughout the film has convincingly shown someone who would just let such betrayals just breeze by him at a certain point given his attitude towards life. O’Brien delivers two strong distinctive performances which facilitates the film effectively and finds genuine emotion consistently. Even more so it is a continuation of exhibiting a greater talent and growth as a performer. 

Friday, 13 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: David Jonsson & Cooper Hoffman in The Long Walk

David Jonsson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Peter "Pete" McVries nor did Cooper Hoffman for portraying Raymond "Ray" Garraty in The Long Walk. 

The Long Walk follows a contest where young men must continue to walk at 3 miles an hour until only one of them is still left alive. 

One of the successes of the Long Walk are the performances which very much are not treating the material as an exploitative horror piece that certainly could’ve been a possibility. They are treating it with a reality which is emphasized best by the pair of leading performances of two of the most talented young actors working today. First in the primary lead role, whom we follow into the starting point of the walk as he’s left off by his emotional mother, played by Cooper Hoffman. Someone who made a striking impression through his comedic work in Licorice Pizza, showing himself not to be merely the son of a great actor, but having the potential to become a great actor himself. Hoffman stretches himself away from that comedic work there in very much taking upon the “any man” type lead as the young man choosing to join the walk despite his mother’s protests. From the outset Hoffman brought such a striking sense of the emotional weight of the decision immediately. His performance in the reaction to his mother’s horror conveying the undercurrent of his heartbreak, even as in his eyes conveying some distant determination that is in his head as he arrives at the starting point where we also meet David Jonsson as Pete McVries played by David Jonsson. Jonsson’s an actor who has already substantially impressed me first for his likable nerdy turn as the romantic lead of Rye Lane, then upped the ante through the different sides of an android in Alien Romulus which went above and beyond the calling of that film, so I was excited what more he had in the tank when it came to this role, and the answer is a lot. Jonsson’s performance is entirely new from him as his previous two turns were working some framework of nerdy in presence, here in many ways he’s the tougher confident one and while he’s got some biceps to back him up here, it is far more so brought to life by Jonsson who is wholly natural despite also being wholly new in his presence here, from his accent, demeanor and just style onscreen. Quite the accomplishment because you’d think the way he acts as Pete is just how he acts and speaks because Jonsson’s entirely natural. 

As the walk begins we instantly start getting the sense of chemistry between Jonsson and Hoffman, which is so tremendous right off the bat that it was not surprising to learn the two are teaming up again with how natural they are as a pair. There’s just this ease with them where the sense of friendship between the two just feels real and jumps out. Once they start talking to one another you see the connection and it just feels absolutely authentic. Where the two are wonderful in connecting the differences between the two within the connection. Hoffman emphasizes an interesting yet convincing combination between this certain optimism in attitude towards those around him while also presenting a very direct distaste for the very concept of the walk despite having signed up for it himself. Jonsson on the other hand presents a certain bluntness as Pete initially says he won’t save Ray if he falls before they start, yet in general brings such a positive disposition. Each offering in a way the same philosophy when you get to the heart of it yet each approaching it their own way as each is a mix of both pessimism and optimism yet present it on their own terms. Something we see as the walk begins where the two discuss what they can do with the money. Jonsson as Pete that he’ll do good is filled with such confidence and assurance in that belief. As assured though is Hoffman’s doubtful words about the nature of the walk and that it is all a falsehood that isn’t at all this random culling it is presented to be. Yet words between the words of intention create such camaraderie, along with the two of the other young men, where every little exchange builds such a palatable sense of warmth and real sense of the mutual spirit between the two guys. Hoffman and Jonsson are so good, and I love particularly Jonsson’s delivery of basically the “screw it” at the idea of not making friends on the walk. As in his eyes there’s such an appreciation for the people around him, it is absolutely wonderful work. 

Within their conversations we learn more about each man, one of the most pivotal when Ray pushes to ask about Pete’s scar across his face, the one moment where that innate positivity of the man stops, not that he becomes sorrowful yet Jonsson conveys a lot of history that he’d rather not get into in this moment as his delivery is of the quiet change of the subject. With Ray, Hoffman’s performance so much is a reflection of the character’s connection with the death of his father, which was personally performed by the chief villain of the piece the Major (Mark Hamill), and something that we watchers of cinema can’t quite separate which is Hoffman’s connection with his own father. Something that the young Hoffman even commented on as pivotal within his performance of someone reckoning with such a painful trauma. Hoffman’s incredibly moving in his portrayal of the moments of the character articulating this not through sadness, but rather this sense of very distinct pride in every word against the system and when he specifically names his father as his hero. Hoffman’s performance has such a tremendous weight within every word where you see just how fundamental the man was in his life and in who he is. Combined then with the moments where he reflects Ray’s passions to fight against the system with this certainty in belief going so far as to want to personally execute the Major if he wins the walk. Hoffman’s delivery of this intention is with such a specific and penetrating hatred that is so remarkable in the moment and you see the festering rage all bottled within a single intention that he whispers to Pete. It must be said Jonsson carries with Hoffman in every moment through his powerful reactions where you see the man genuinely taking in everything his new friend has said and factoring it into his mind. 

Within the walk itself almost all the actors, including Jonsson and Hoffman do a great job of portraying the physical weight of the walk and just creating a convincing progression of showing the phases of exhaustion throughout, including moments of dazed sleepiness, to re-finding their energy, to just getting to the point of being almost completely lost from the weight of the physical exhaustion. Of course reacting more within the walk is dealing with the violence of every “loser” in the game while also dealing with the other players. An element where again there is a great contrast between Jonsson and Hoffman. Jonsson excels in just having such a striking presence defined by confidence, where even when he’s targeted by the insults of another, Jonsson’s delivery is so great in emphasizing the way the man kind just walks right past every insult and so believably creating the resilient spirit of the man. Contrasting that Hoffman is also great in portraying a less convincing confidence. Presenting it as something that isn’t the natural state of Ray rather something he’s striving for. We see this when he tries to help the men falling behind where Ray’s encouragements are real but also have a degree of desperation. Hoffman articulates naturally the degree of vulnerability within Ray who is striving to win yet might not entirely be able to face what that means. Earning then the moment where Ray almost dies by almost falling asleep right before a long hill with his sudden outrage against Pete not as hate but rather the man being overcome by too much fear in the moment leading him to lash out at anyone. Hoffman created that unpredictable random emotion of the state of Ray in that moment. As convincing and even more powerful is the moment where Pete just goes about saving Ray, Jonsson’s performance is incredible because in his face you do see that he took in Ray’s words in the moment, yet at the same time you see that resilience and even belief in humanity as he takes charge of Ray’s walk helping him get to safety. 

The guardian for Ray aspect is where Jonsson’s work just goes above and beyond in portraying such sincerity the real friendship for Ray with the conviction not to let his friend die despite the “winner takes all” nature of the game they’re in. Jonsson’s articulation of Pete’s optimism is absolutely stunning work from Jonsson and frankly managed to give me chills by just how much emotional truth Jonsson manages to bring to a convincing belief in humanity within a nihilistic game. Jonsson’s performance is so great because he shows, as Pete says, that it’s not easy, it's hard. Jonsson describes Pete’s violent past filled with such detail where you sense every moment of the man’s horrible emotional turmoil in the nuance in Jonsson’s expression as he explains how he got his scar. His face is of a man who has been through hell, yet within that situation has come out not to hate humanity but to believe in it. Jonsson’s passionate ask of Ray to take the joy in life where and when he can has such poignancy, because Jonsson manages not to only convey that this is absolutely a fundamental belief to Pete, he convinces us as the audience to give it a chance, by showing every word coming through a man who we understand as gone through a grinder to come out still with this sense of hope. There’s nothing forced about it, it is absolutely real and Jonsson makes it real. And through that reality we believe every moment of Pete refusing to let Ray die and convinces us of the purity of his belief even as they go through one harrowing moment after another. Where Hoffman and Jonsson make you feel every loss we witness, because their reactions show both men taking in each kill deep into their souls. Whereas much as we see the physical toll of the walk, even more profound is the emotional toll that each depicts in similar yet also very specifically honest to the characters of Ray and Pete. 

At a certain point in the film it does strike you that both of them cannot survive and I love Jonsson’s subtle work in suggesting just how deeply Ray is starting to mean to him every time this comes up. We know both cannot survive and we start to feel the impending devastation before it even comes because you want to see these two survive and continue the profound friendship we’ve witnessed and brought to life so beautifully by both actors. Building up and leading to the climax where they are the final two. One pivotal moment when Ray almost dies as he stops to see his mom where Hoffman is quickly devastating in showing the intensity of his emotional distress and seeing just how painful it is to see his mom in the moment. Jonsson’s also great in the moment bringing as much passion though fashioned in Pete stressing that Ray can’t let his mom see him be executed and funneled through that specific empathy. The final scene of the film I’ll be perfectly honest, on re-watch stands as the most heartbreaking scene from 2025 for me with Cooper and Jonsson’s performances being essential to this realization. As they bring that warmth and love of friendship between every moment, as first in Jonsson’s reaction of contentment as he sits down to let Ray live, to Ray then bringing the brightest smile as he gets Pete walking again before sitting down himself to allow him to be shot. Hoffman’s final impassioned delivery that articulates his love for Pete but also even more so his belief that Pete can do good, rips my heart straight out. Particularly his delivery “that’s why I love you” that’s filled with that love but also acceptance of his faith for the sake of Pete. If that wasn’t brutal enough it’s Jonsson’s depiction of his immediate visceral grief at the death of his friend that just twists the knife. There's so much humanity within every cry out of Ray's name and you feel every bit of the tremendous sorrow within Jonsson’s heart wrenching performance. Jonsson’s performance though still has to thread the trickiest of needles to deliver on the film’s ending which frankly wouldn’t work if Jonsson’s was less than perfect. Well he is perfect in the sequence as Jonsson’s portrayal of Pete’s decision to ask for a gun and complete Ray’s wish by killing the major himself manages to in a way combine the cynicism and optimism in the act. Showing the intention of violence but within his eyes the heartbreak of the man who is killing the major not for himself but for the sake of his friend. Jonsson being as captivating then in the specific almost levity in his manner as Pete turns and continues to walk into the night. Both deliver great performances and is the chemistry between them really elevates the entirety of the film. Hoffman proving that his previous performance wasn't a fluke. Jonsson though maybe going even further in showing such a compelling presence and incredible emotional range. Together though creating such a poignant yet painfully tragic portrait of friendship. 

Thursday, 12 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: Frank Dillane in Urchin

Frank Dillane did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Mike in Urchin. 

Urchin follows a homeless drug addict. 

Frank Dillane, son of Stephen, plays the role of the homeless addict where we enter the film seemingly as the man is at his lowest where we see him begging for money, loitering inside and fighting with another homeless addict. With such a performance it really is all about whether or not it feels like a put on, which with Dillane it does not. As he delivers from the start the physicality of the man who seems to be in a state of physical unease if not pain at all times. A degree of potential violence in every word he speaks there’s kind of an unpredictability. His eyes and expression filled with the history of a man who has mostly spent his life in this way and along an unpleasant path. There’s rarely any joy and there’s an innate messiness of the man who we see obviously no clarity in his shambling way of even walking. The eventual act of Mike violently attacking a man who has attempted to help and befriend him, is particularly unnerving because within the act there is no hesitation and his immediate apology of “sorry sorry’ isn’t precisely fake however just within Mike’s sorry state of only existing within the idea of the momentary fix. 

When being interrogated for his crime Dillane’s denial of any cause and an explanation that it was the other’s man’s fault is bad lying in his delivery but not in terms of doubt, rather just in terms of it being too exact in his rambling as someone far too comfortable in coming up with bad lies. Something we see followed up closely as he calls someone he knows to say he’s been arrested again and is sentenced for months of prison time. Dillane’s specific delivery of “I’ve been arrested again” speaks to such a history as he says it so easily so calmly, so much of someone who's been through this before and doesn’t even see it as an out of the ordinary experience for him. We jump ahead after he’s cleaned up through time in prison and meets the condition of his parole. Where the familiarity in itself is almost the same as when he was homeless. Dillane’s performance is one defined by the lack of surprise, even when he tries to fashion a kind of hope his expression almost denotes it being as a delusional joke that he is aware of just as much as the person he’s talking to. 

We follow Mike as he has the potential job as a chef at a hotel, where Dillane’s great in the scene of the interview in putting forth the attempt at earnest interest. Where he is able to convey the challenge in the young man who wants to try to do something, even an earnest bit of excitement in it, but a limitation in all his reactions where there’s the barrier of the man from a state of true normalcy. The moment with the owner asking him about his crime, just for his own awareness of the nature of his violence, Dillane’s delivery of the explanation carries so much in the simplicity of it. There is shame as he explains what he did but again there’s also a directness though of someone whose committed desperate asks like that before and may do so again. Where we even see the intensity within the man that speaks to the challenge of his life as he wears the stress of an irate customer so fiercely in his eyes or when he challenges a mediator for the voice he’s using with a sensitivity of someone on this emotional edge even when he’s supposedly “healthy”. 

There are slight comforts as he bonds with his coworkers but even then to describe Dillane as truly calm would be false and he keeps the sense of despondency within the man who is just above the water yet hardly safe. When he meets with his victim in a court ordered session, Dillane’s performance exudes the uncertainty of the man’s mental state where again there is the pain of shame but in no way is there any true understanding of any sense of how to proceed forward with himself, barely getting to look at the man or even acknowledging the mistake to the man. We find then the progression of Mike essentially moving back to the beginning even as he has a romance with a coworker that only leads to him being introduced to drugs again. A pivotal scene in Dillane’s performance is the taking of the drugs that are offered to him casually. Mike refuses them at first then takes them. Dillane doesn’t put a lot on the decision but in doing so shows within it this being a cycle for Mike. He takes the drugs and then he’s just back in it again. What we see is going from the nervous man on the edge of the drugs to becoming the completely lost man we saw at the start of the film. Dillane naturally reverts back to his more disjointed manner and ever increasingly paranoid man until he’s fully back to the start again. It’s a captivating performance with a very specific intention. Which isn't the recovery of the addict, but rather fully the cycle of one. Dillane effectively detailing each step from the dangerous homeless man on the edge of life, to the man straining for recovery, to falling to his demons, to back to that edge again. 

Wednesday, 11 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: Joel Edgerton in Train Dreams

Joel Edgerton did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Robert Grainier in Train Dreams. 

Train Dreams tells the life story of a logger who lived from the late 19th century to the mid 20th century. 

I return to the very talented Joel Edgerton interestingly in another role that Robert Duvall probably would’ve knocked out of the park. As Edgerton plays Robert Grainier a man representing history, though not historical but really could be any number of men of the period, who were part of the creation of America as we know it however no one would pay 25 cents to walk in the rooms where he grew up, no children would be named after him, though someone might plagiarize the Assassination of Jesse James to describe the character. Edgerton is constructing a man of a specific time but a specific one in which in many ways must still be universal. Something he achieves frankly with such remarkable ease in terms of the conception of his performance. Edgerton is one of those actors where you’d never think he’s Australian as Robert in reality, in fact you wouldn’t even second guess him as just being this logger. A logger who began his life as a train orphan sent into the west and finding a life for himself largely isolated within himself as he goes about his work as a logger. Edgerton’s work is able to embody silence so potently where he never simply is on the screen and importantly there is the life of the character within the silences. Where Edgerton’s performance alludes to a man already living with an innate sadness as the abandoned child, not as a man overwhelmed by this emotion but one who regardless lives with it. 

The importance of Edgerton’s performance in many ways is the lack of importance of it. Edgerton fashions nothing within Robert to make Robert any more or less than he is. Edgerton instead does not create any semblance of quirk or eccentricity, he is just any old man in so many ways and the way Edgerton can embody and make that compelling is what is the greatness of this performance. Because Edgerton seeks only to present life, and within that, even though technically he doing an accent, technically he is doing much in terms of the physicality of the role, particularly the way Robert is so often turned in towards himself in terms of his body language and so often looks down rather than up, speaks much about who is is as a man isolated in the world, none of it feels like a bit of effort from the performer. Edgerton makes the most essential success in this performance which is simply existing as the man. Never is there a question of performance, he is just this man, and that is the essential truth that needs to exist so we can then just follow Robert in his journey. Edgerton never gets in the way of seeing the man as he is within each moment of it and there is the fundamental great success of this performance from his starting point. 

Edgerton’s performance wears a difficult life, his eyes begin with a weariness, not one that needs to grow and speaks to where the man has already come from and the work he has already done in the dangerous work he performs as a man. With an early traumatic event coming while Robert is on a bridge building crew and a group of men go about casually murdering one of the Chinese workers. Edgerton’s performance in the scene is a pivotal establishment of the observing man as in his eyes we do see the concern even in his ask of “what’s he done?”, however at the same time a man unable to break a general complacency as the murder happens in front him. Edgerton’s reaction in the moment and thereafter showing the haunting vision of the crime still being worn in Robert’s eyes as he must now live with regardless of what he does with his life. Contrasting that an early light comes in the form of his eventual wife Gladys (Felicity Jones) who makes advances towards Robert far more than Robert does towards her. What Edgerton captures with Jones isn’t this red hot sort of romance, but rather a very poignant calm connection between the two. Where Edgerton just exudes a greater comfort, speaking a few more lines than usual, and within those lines Edgerton emphasizes a degree of growth of the man reaching out a bit more by being awoken by his wife. There’s a natural sincerity in their chemistry that makes their connection and initial life together as they make a log cabin home near a river, that powerfully illustrates the importance of being taken away from isolation even more so than love. 

Robert must return to his logging job every year far from Gladys where Edgerton is able to artfully yet quietly reflect the often harsh elements, not in big reactions but little ones that convey the constant threat of death. An element that Edgerton doesn’t portray as a debilitating fear but rather a subdued awareness of the nature of the space. Within this time we see him react to a few people, particularly explosive expert Arn Peeples (William H. Macy), where we get just a bit of camaraderie between them. Edgerton’s performance is notable in his reaching out to the older man with an earnest interest in what he has to say and more importantly an earnest wish to make connection with him. Edgerton, something he does consistently throughout, is putting just enough on a given moment of bringing us quietly within his mental space. Particularly in moments such as seeing a dead man’s boots placed into a tree, where within Edgerton’s performance you see in his eyes how much these losses do follow him, yet within that expression there is also just the quiet resilience of keeping that path. This is even to the point of Arn’s own death from a random fallen branch, where Robert stays with him in his final moments, which Edgerton is able to emphasize the empathy in Robert’s watching and listening but also the powerful sense of a man being unable to know what to say or how to really understand the man’s death. 

The respite being consistently for Robert with his wife and eventually his daughter as well. Where Edgerton brings the beauty of the simplicity of the joys in spending time with both of them and finding the pain of separating from them. Making it so when a massive forest fire ravages his home while Robert is away it is absolutely devastating. And what we see is the true power of his performance, because as much as Edgerton quietly carries the film through so much of it, when he raises his voice it has such a tremendous weight to it. In this instance portraying the penetrating anguish as he looks for his wife and daughter within the ashes of his home. Edgerton’s eyes filled specifically with such a pain of the man being lost and alone as he wanders around the graveyard of his life. Edgerton having one of his most verbal moments as he looks upon the image of the Chinese man who haunts him, where Edgerton’s delivery which is apologetic but with the terrible sadness as he states that his wife and daughter were too much a cost for the “payment” of his past failure. Only finding any respite between frequent visits from local shopkeep Ignatius Jack (Nathaniel Arcand) and finding stray dogs. Edgerton is incredibly moving in creating the small steps away from the sorrow. A sorrow he never entirely loses but finding a man having moments of connections when he can. Finding in particular his interactions with the dogs having a poignancy of a lonely man finding some relief for his isolation.

We follow Robert then as an aging man including one more trip to a logging expedition where Edgerton is almost silent in this sequence, yet amazing work in providing the way that Robert is even more lost than before. Including a moment where he speaks to another former fellow logger talking about Arn, where the older man can’t tie his shoes nor even remember that Arn died. Edgerton’s reactions in these moments are so subdued yet heartbreaking in his reactions of empathy towards the man but while also being struck at seeing his potential future if he were to keep coming back as a logger who no longer has a place on the jobs. Leaving Robert instead as providing essentially a local taxi service via wagon where Edgerton projects in his physical manner so effectively the detachment to his customers even when he’s directly speaking to them. That is until he takes a forest service worker Claire (Kerry Condon) where he finally has a longer conversation. Initially just from her more brazen personality where she leads the conversation where Edgerton’s great in the shyness of his work that grants years of not being the focus of conversation or even having someone to converse with in such an open way. Which eventually leads to a more poignant discussion between the two on their mutual losses including Robert finally talking about having lost his family. 

Edgerton is masterful in this scene bringing such a weighted sense of the life the man has lived in every word, the painful sorrow in every word as he speaks about the pain of his loss at times being too much. There is so much within it that he lets out just a bit, but the amount that we can see in his eyes is almost more than he can bear. Just the way in Edgerton’s voice just a bit, as he doesn’t even entirely lose his composure is so heartbreaking, because you do know the years have past, the nature of the man is to keep it inside, yet the emotions we see still are so raw and honest in every moment of Edgerton’s performance. Love also Edgerton’s consideration of Claire’s words about her own loss and the importance of every little thing. Edgerton’s great because it isn’t a simple comfort, just consideration and attempting to find that meaning in his eyes of man lost. Yet there is something as powerful in his minor chuckle at the idea of him being a hermit in the woods and being of some kind of importance. A meaning though that is Robert’s focus as we follow him in his remaining years. Visiting a phony freak show that promises answers with Edgerton’s quiet breakdown carrying remarkable punctuation of man struggling at the lack of one. The moment of looking at himself in the mirror Edgerton is amazing as you see the man surprised at the years represented by his own face and a man lost even within himself in a way. Contrasting that however is the film’s final scene where he takes a plane ride and while observing the size of the world below him, Edgerton’s reaction is that comfort in the way and even contentment. It is only a reaction yet speaks volumes of the native tongue of silence for Robert. Edgerton delivers an a masterclass in subtlety built upon not noise rather on hushed tones and often silence. Finding so much nuance, so much texture and so much soul in every second we spend with the type of man who wouldn’t be noted by history but is reflective of the history of so many lives. 

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: David Strathairn in A Little Prayer

David Strathairn did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Bill in A Little Prayer. 

A Little Prayer follows a father as he has to deal with knowledge of his adult son’s infidelities. 

David Strathairn had a low key but actually fairly remarkable 2025, although in part from two of those films, including this one’s, delayed releases, regardless making the most of three very different roles. Whether that is playing the game show producer who sees his gamble go astray in The Luckiest Man in America, a role that would’ve been easy to play simplistic jerk note but Strathairn found quite a bit of complication within that part, as well as even his work in Zootopia 2. Strathairn was not just cashing a VO paycheck with that, giving his all to really put the lynx in a billionaire villain lynx for all that it was worth. But his most remarkable work is his extremely low key performance in in this film as the patriarch of a seemingly close knit family with his reenactor wife, Venida (Celia Weston), his son David (Will Pullen) whom he runs the family business with and his daughter-in-law Tammy (Jane Levy). Strathairn in the early scenes brings a nice ease of place and exudes very much the history of his Bill. Which is just a man who lives for his family and has been through some things but we just sense someone who is seemingly mostly at ease with his life. Strathairn brings this innate subdued warmth about him, particularly in his interactions early on with Tammy where he shows just a genuine care for her. 

Strathairn’s performance then becomes one of the leads though within an observational place as we follow Bill within his workplace and notices his son acting a bit strangely with one of their employees. Strathairn does a lot with his eyes here in conveying the thoughts that Bill is going through and does bring something really in basically any glance. Completely conveying the determination that his son is sleeping around on his wife. Strathairn’s reaction initially I think manages to say a great deal because the reaction isn’t of extreme horror rather of this quiet disappointment in the realization. And within the realization Strathairn has a degree of exasperation in his eyes of not a man fed up with his son but rather too much of an awareness of the failings of his son, or at least to a degree that he is aware of. So when he attempts an initial attempt to talk to David about his behavior, Strathairn’s delivery is very modest but very earnest. There’s less of trying to punish his son as he converses with him and more so trying to talk to him in regards to what he sees as the value of Tammy in the family. Unfortunately the conversation goes nowhere as David shuts it down by saying it is none of Bill’s business, and Strathairn’s quiet defeat is a defeat of years of dealing with a son who seemingly rejects his father’s advice on a consistent basis. 

We follow Bill then as he tries to uncover more information about what his son has been doing and unfortunately for him this eventually leads to a conversation with the woman his son is having the affair with which only reveals that David is even worse than he thought as she reveals that David also was verbally and physically abusive towards her. Strathairn’s reactionary work is incredibly moving because you see within his quiet distress there’s such pain and more than a bit of shame that David is his son. Strathairn carefully not presents this as a reaction of superiority rather just the sense of being lost, not lost for words how his son could be such a bad person but rather lost how he could raise such a son. Well this is going concurrently Tammy also having figured out David’s infidelity chose to abort their child, and eventually Tammy and Bill meetup to discuss the situation by spending the day together. This is the best scene in the film as both Strathairn and Levy are great together. 

What is so remarkable is the way they are able to create such a unique yet winning chemistry with one another. Which isn’t romantic yet is filled with such a sense of warmth and Strathairn’s great in showing how her presence in a way seems to illuminate and inspire the best of Bill. Creating the important sense of additional motivation in Bill initially to fix the relationship because within Strathairn’s performance you see the strong uncomplicated love for Tammy that Bill no doubt would want to have for his son, yet his son’s deep flaw can never allow for such simplicity. Strathairn finds such poignant chemistry with Levy in their conversation where he actually ends up advising her to leave. In Strathairn’s delivery there is a powerful combination of conviction of his sentiment of every word as the right thing but with the underlying burden of knowing this will end the relationship with someone he has come to deeply care for. An element that only becomes all the more painful when Tammy admits her connection with Bill as a “kindred spirit” and Strathairn’s reaction to this “confession” is heartbreaking because you see in his calm yet still devastated expression of someone feeling every bit of this loss that is only amplified by seeing that her love for him has been as great for him. It is a beautifully rendered scene by both actors where they create such a state of pure sincerity where all the complications involving David is still weighing on both, yet the direct honesty of the real affection between the two makes it far from just a moment of mutual suffering. It is with that specific shared spark of joy that leaves such a memorable impression so naturally realized by both actors as a true connection. While this whole performance is naturally realized by the talents of Strathairn, a performer who is always a welcome presence and hopefully we get a few more filmmakers to utilize this in the upcoming years. 

Monday, 9 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025: Paul Mescal in Hamnet

Paul Mescal did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a SAG and a BAFTA, for portraying William Shakespeare in Hamnet.

Hamnet follows the life of Shakespeare through the relationship with his wife Agnes (Jessie Buckley). Paul Mescal takes on the role of the bard in decidedly different terms than the more lighthearted depiction by Joseph Fiennes in Shakespeare in Love. This version attempts a more realistic, only within limits, depiction of Shakespeare and really in part his come up as a writer, though the ambitions of such are specifically within the context of his relationship with his wife and family with any focus on sort of what we know Shakespeare as being relatively limited till the third act of the film. Mescal fittingly doesn’t give importance to his Will, and what I mean by that is that there is no presentation of Shakespeare as a legend in the making. Rather we find him initially as a latin tutor who doesn’t exactly take his position all too seriously. And the nature of the structure of the film is Mescal essentially depicts different phases of the man’s life, because there are consistent though unstated time jumps throughout the film. This opening Mescal brings a sort of flighty quality of the ambitious young man stuck in a place where such ambition seems to fall upon mostly deaf ears if not even the direct ire of his rather strict and humorless father. Mescal effectively brings more so a boyish energy in these moments, an impishness really in creating the degree of immaturity of Shakespeare at this time and really leaving much room to grow as a man. 

His initial scenes with Agnes Mescal bring that same quality and his fascination with her is largely that initially. Where he creates the intrigue with her and is drawn into her unique qualities as a person, as this seeming connecting point with nature…atlhough I will say watching the film again that particular aspect only became more halfbaked if not a bit silly at times. Will brings his own value within the relationship as we get very directly his storytelling ability as he recounts the tale of Orpheus’s descent into the underworld. Mescal is truly great in this scene because for this scene he becomes a great storyteller and shows a preview of the storyteller that Shakespeare will become with his own material. Mescal reciting the tale though is captivating by managing to bring this very particular pace and rhythm as to entrance the audience into the particular tragedy of this story. Mescal has that particular ability here to emphasize a pause or a word that just brings together the emotion of the story and not just the plot of it. Making it so Mescal lets you feel the tragedy of Orpheus as he creates even the particular pace to build towards the climax of the piece and make you feel the impact of Orpheus's loss. It’s a standout moment for Mescal and suggests the greatness of Shakespeare before he has become great. 

We have our first kind of jump in time when Will impregnates Agnes, which even within that Mescal’s effective in bringing moments of immaturity though with the poetic license such as his delivery of having no ability for waiting, but afterwards with a quiet conviction of the man who will stand by his action to take Agnes as his wife. Where we get the first step to then just the playful married couple which is a very short segment, however Mescal’s good in playing Will, even as he’s going off to London to make a name for himself is still in the newlywed sort of state in his ease of excitement with wife and just a clear sense of love for her. Where we get another jump where it is now Will, Agnes and their three children including the young twins of Hamnet (Jacobi Jupe) and Judith. Mescal again changes his presence a bit to now very much the more mature dad. We still get the spark of mischief when playing with the kids, however there is a greater sense of emotional maturity. Mescal’s pivotal scene with Jupe expresses this beautifully as he brings first this quiet delivery of a father very seriously tasking his son with being mature himself, before breaking and his repeated “will you be brave” where he so wonderfully changes to the fun loving father just wanting to play with his son. An element reinforced in his scene with Agnes discussing where they will live in the future, where she’s adamant to stay in the country meanwhile Will’s destiny is in the city. Mescal’s very subdued work illustrates the greater maturity of Will at this point with an honestly quieter sense of romance, where the warmth is still there but the emphasis now is on the contemplation of the future.

A future that becomes cloudy when while Will is away Judith falls ill, almost dies, followed by Hamnet also falling ill and dying. Mescal’s performance isn’t the one accentuated in these scenes but he’s still great in delivering the gravity of the loss from what we do see him. We see the initial reaction of pain and he is heartbreaking in bringing that so tangibly to life in these moments. The third act though takes Will again away from his family seemingly living within his grief on his own as he’s putting on one of his most famous plays named Hamnet. Where we get two similar scenes, one amazing one less so. The first being the scene of the actors playing Hamlet and Ophelia the off to the nunnery speech, where Mescal’s incredible in his work as he’s pacing about and continuing to ask them to play it “again”. His delivery of again, his expression, is filled with so much complicated emotion as we see the pain of his loss, the frustrations with his life, and most importantly the rage of the world. Where Mescal is outstanding in his own delivery of the speech to the actors. As I love that Mescal is able to deliver it as the meaning not so much as it is in the play but as it represents Will in this moment. Where there is some anger of the director struggling with his actors, but even more so the rage against the world which the speech represents in itself as Hamlet notes the pathetic state of man. Mescal doesn’t become Hamlet in the moment, he is Shakespeare in the moment, completely conveying his emotional state behind the words so powerfully. 

Needlessly doubling down the film immediately has Will alone where he recites “To be or Not to Be” as he seemingly contemplates suicide at the docks of London. I say needlessly because the previous scene I think made essentially the same point more naturally, more efficiently and more effectively, using a less frequently spoken part of Hamlet, meanwhile this is arguably Shakespeare’s most famous. Having said this I hang none of this at Mescal’s door, and while not as powerful as his previous scene, Mescal still delivers on the speech by again playing as the writer reflecting on his work rather than Hamlet, here less rage and just pure sorrow into the words that reflect upon death. Although I’d argue his less "substantive" in terms of Hamlet’s text work as the “ghost” when we finally see the production, it also better serves the idea. Where Mescal combines the sense of genuine emotion and performative emotion, delivers this quiet grief stricken darkness to the ghost as he delivers his message to Hamlet on stage. Mescal conveying in the moment the burden to be caught within this state of death and really in the painful state of grief. While not the focus of the final moments, Mescal’s reactions are pivotal as he reacts to the crowd and really his wife’s reaction to the end of Hamlet…well forgetting Fortinbras and all that but I digress. My joke aside, Mescal is great in the way it is less of a cure but rather the grief is there but intertwined with hope. Hope in his eyes that he and Agnes will find any closures and catharsis in this attempt at a reflection of their loss. Mescal finding just the right subdued even meekness in the man only carefully looking up to see if he has made the connection. Although Mescal became an afterthought within the praise of the film, though I think in part due to the misguided category fraud, it is unfortunate as his performances is essential to the film. First in creating the jumps in time, where we don't see the steps, yet Mescal makes each phase feel natural from the last in creating detail and nuance in the life of Shakespeare here presented with a purposeful vagueness at times. Mescal never feels vague, and even champions the film's most overt moments in terms of referencing the bard. And while I do have mixed feelings on the two most overt uses of the words before the ending, none of those feelings come from Mescal who always finds the power in the words but power not from Shakespeare as a literary legend but from Will as a man. 

Saturday, 7 February 2026

Alternate Best Actor 2025

 And the Nominees Were Not:

Lee Byung-hun in No Other Choice

Jesse Plemons in Bugonia

Joel Edgerton in Train Dreams

David Jonsson in The Long Walk

Paul Mescal in Hamnet

Feel free to predict these five, those five or both.

Robert Aramayo in I Swear

Josh O'Connor in Wake Up Dead Man

Dylan O'Brien in Twinless

David Strathairn in A Little Prayer

Frank Dillane in Urchin

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2025: Results

5. William H. Macy in Train Dreams - Macy delivers an impressive transformative turn that represents his film's time and place with such poignancy.

Best Scene: Reflection on the trees.
4. Tyler Okonma in Marty Supreme - Okonma delivers such a wonderfully charismatic performance that sings through his chemistry with Chalamet. 

Best Scene: The hustle.
3. Russell Crowe in Nuremberg - Crowe elevates every bit of his film he can in presenting the evil of a man who believes himself above traditional moralities. 

Best Scene: Tale of his uncle.
2. Jacobi Jupe in Hamnet - Jupe gives a heartbreaking and endearing performance as he manages to deliver a child's earnestness with an adult's emotional conviction. 

Best Scene: Cheating death.
1. Jack O'Connell in Sinners - O'Connell delivers a truly great villainous turn where he manages to be truly menacing, rather funny, quite charismatic, wonderfully musical and even finds a bit of pathos in his vampire. 

Best Scene: First attempt at entrance. 
Overall Ranking:
  1. Sean Penn in One Battle After Another
  2. Jack O'Connell in Sinners
  3. Jacobi Jupe in Hamnet  - 5
  4. Benicio del Toro in One Battle After Another
  5. Russell Crowe in Nuremberg
  6. Ralph Fiennes in 28 Years Later
  7. Tyler Okonma in Marty Supreme
  8. William H. Macy in Train Dreams
  9. John Leguizamo in Bob Trevino Likes It
  10. Delroy Lindo in Sinners
  11. James Raterman in One Battle After Another - 4.5
  12. Danny Huston in The Naked Gun
  13. Charlie Plummer in The Long Walk
  14. David Bradley in Frankenstein
  15. Lewis Pullman in The Testament of Ann Lee
  16. Peter Mullan in I Swear
  17. Kevin O'Leary in Marty Supreme
  18. Kenny Rasmussen in The Plague
  19. Abel Ferrara in Marty Supreme
  20. Géza Röhrig in Marty Supreme
  21. Aidan Delbis in Bugonia
  22. Josh Brolin in Wake Up Dead Man
  23. Lee Sung-min in No Other Choice
  24. Joe Alwyn in Hamnet
  25. Noah Jupe in Hamnet
  26. Jeffrey Wright in Highest 2 Lowest
  27. Alexander Skarsgård in Pillion
  28. Daniel Craig in Wake Up Dead Man
  29. Andrew Scott in Blue Moon
  30. Ryusei Yokohama in Kokuho
  31. Conan O'Brien in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
  32. Leo Woodall in Nuremberg
  33. Will Patton in Train Dreams
  34. Jay Lycurgo in Steve
  35. Tom Burke in Black Bag
  36. Pedro Pascal in Freaky Tales
  37. Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts
  38. Nicholas Hoult in Superman
  39. Tut Nyuot in The Long Walk
  40. Christoph Waltz in Frankenstein
  41. Carlos Francisco in The Secret Agent
  42. Patrick Kennedy in Blue Moon
  43. David Strathairn in The Luckiest Man in America
  44. Alden Ehrenreich in Weapons
  45. Nathaniel Arcand in Train Dreams
  46. Tony Goldwyn in One Battle After Another 
  47. Ratso Sloman in Marty Supreme
  48. David Harbour in Thunderbolts
  49. Josh Brolin in Weapons
  50. John Hoogenakker in One Battle After Another 
  51. Liev Schreiber in Caught Stealing
  52. Bobby Cannavale in Blue Moon
  53. Chris Evans in The Materialists
  54. Ben Foster in Christy
  55. Andrew Garfield in After The Hunt
  56. Jonah Wren Phillips in Bring Her Back
  57. Garrett Wareing in The Long Walk
  58. Joseph Quinn in Fantastic Four: The First Steps - 4
  59. Rupert Evans in Truth & Treason
  60. Akira Emoto in Rental Family
  61. Cha Seung-won in No Other Choice
  62. Vincent D'Onofrio in Caught Stealing
  63. Douglas Hodge in Pillion
  64. Kaiony Venâncio in The Secret Agent
  65. John Carroll Lynch in Sorry Baby
  66. Joshua Odjick in The Long Walk
  67. Cary Christopher in Weapons
  68. Rolf Saxon in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  69. David Strathairn in Zootopia 2
  70. Kevin Durand in The Naked Gun
  71. Ben Mendelsohn in Freaky Tales
  72. Edi Gathegi in Superman
  73. Christian Slater in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
  74. Peter Dinklage in Roofman
  75. Luke Manley in Marty Supreme
  76. Nick Nolte in Die My Love
  77. Park Hee-soon in No Other Choice
  78. Koto Kawaguchi in Marty Supreme
  79. Tramell Tillman in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  80. Paul Walter Hauser in The Naked Gun
  81. Robert Aramayo in Palestine 36
  82. Skyler Gisondo in Superman
  83. Chad L. Coleman in Christy
  84. Tom Hanks in Freaky Tales
  85. Aaron Taylor-Johnson in 28 Years Later
  86. Jim Downey in One Battle After Another
  87. Omar Benson Miller in Sinners
  88. Nathaniel Arcand in Train Dreams
  89. Paul Rudd in Friendship
  90. Joel Edgerton in The Plague
  91. Patrick Warburton in Zootopia 2
  92. John Catsimadtidis in Marty Supreme
  93. Christopher McDonald in Happy Gilmore 2
  94. Paul Grimstad in One Battle After Another
  95. Kayo Martin in The Plague
  96. Benedict Wong in Weapons 
  97. Ralph Colucci in Marty Supreme
  98. Bill Kelly in Christy
  99. ASAP Rocky in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
  100. Michael Cera in The Phoenician Scheme
  101. Eric Schweig in One Battle After Another
  102. Ebon Moss-Bachrach in Fantastic Four: The First Steps
  103. Andy Samberg in Zootopia 2
  104. Ryan Bader in The Smashing Machine
  105. Penn Jillette in Marty Supreme
  106. Mark Hamill in The Life of Chuck
  107. George Gervin in Marty Supreme
  108. Gabriel Spahiu in Kontinental '25
  109. Daryl McCormack in Wake Up Dead Man
  110. Jon Bernthal in The Accountant 2
  111. Paul Schneider in Train Dreams
  112. Bas Rutten in The Smashing Machine
  113. Robério Diógenes in The Secret Agent
  114. Ahn Hyo-seop in KPop Demon Hunters
  115. Luke Ayres in Steve
  116. Joshua J Parker in Steve
  117. Araloyin Oshunremi in Steve
  118. Tut Nyuot in Steve
  119. Richard E. Grant in Nuremberg 
  120. Kevin Tighe in One Battle After Another
  121. Jay Ellis in Freaky Tales
  122. Yul Vazquez in The Lost Bus
  123. Chris Cooper in The History of Sound
  124. Lee Byung-hun in KPop Demon Hunters
  125. Takehiro Hira in Rental Family
  126. Pico Iyer in Marty Supreme
  127. Roney Villela in The Secret Agent
  128. Șerban Pavlu in Kontinental '25
  129. John Diehl in Train Dreams
  130. D.W. Moffett in One Battle After Another 
  131. Edvin Ryding in 28 Years Later
  132. Anthony Carrigan in Superman
  133. Wyatt Russell in Thunderbolts 
  134. Nathan Fillion in Superman
  135. Tom Hiddleston in The Life of Chuck
  136. Lukas Gage in Companion
  137. Lars Mikkelsen in Frankenstein
  138.  H. Jon Benjamin in Familiar Touch 
  139. Timothy Olyphant in Havoc
  140. Dennis Quaid in Sovereign 
  141. Benjamin Pajak in The Life of Chuck
  142. Christian Convery in The Monkey
  143. Jeffrey Wright in The Phoenician Scheme
  144. Steven Yeun in Mickey 17
  145. Simon Delaney in Blue Moon
  146. Soya Kurokawa in Kokuho
  147. Fisher Stevens in Song Sung Blue
  148. Cosmo Jarvis in Warfare
  149. Joseph Quinn in Warfare
  150. Jason Schwartzman in Mountainhead
  151. Pruitt Taylor Vince in Superman
  152. Min Tanaka in Kokuho
  153. Ken Watanabe in Kokuho
  154. Hudson Hensley in Song Sung Blue
  155. Shamier Anderson in The Luckiest Man in America
  156. Benedict Cumberbatch in The Phoenician Scheme
  157. Carl Lumbly in The Life of Chuck
  158. Bryan Hibbard in Christy
  159. Adonis TanÈ›a in Kontinental ’25
  160. Harrison Ford in Captain America: Brave New World
  161. Chiwetel Ejiofor in The Life of Chuck
  162. Jesper Christensen in Sentimental Value
  163. Pedro Pascal in The Materialists
  164. Amr Waked in Urchin
  165. Harris Dickinson in Urchin
  166. John Magaro in The Mastermind
  167. Griffin Dunne in Caught Stealing
  168. Aubry Dullin in Nouvelle Vague
  169. Ralph Ineson in Fantastic Four: The First Steps
  170. Laurence Fishburne in The Amateur
  171. LaKeith Stanfield in Roofman
  172. Udo Kier in The Secret Agent
  173. Sam Worthington in Relay 
  174. Bill Camp in The Mastermind
  175. Bruno Dreyfürst  in Nouvelle Vague
  176. Øyvind Hesjedal Loven in Sentimental Value
  177. Daniel Dae Kim in KPop Demon Hunters
  178. Bill Lee in Eephus
  179. Akemnji Ndifornyen in The Ballad of Wallis Island
  180. Jim Belushi in Song Sung Blue
  181. Stephen Lang in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  182. Stavros Halkias in Bugonia - 3.5
  183. Tim Blake Nelson in The Testament of Ann Lee
  184. Tom Hanks in The Phoenician Scheme
  185. Bryan Cranston in The Phoenician Scheme
  186. Emory Cohen in Roofman
  187. Ted Williams in Marty Supreme
  188. Charles Melton in Warfare
  189. Louis Cancelmi in Sorry Baby
  190. Riz Ahmed in The Phoenician Scheme
  191. David Cale in The Testament of Ann Lee
  192. Michael Gandolfini in Warfare
  193. Will Poulter in Warfare
  194. Pierce Brosnan in Black Bag
  195. Jeremy Irons in Palestine 36
  196. Christopher Abbott in The Testament of Ann Lee
  197. Mathieur Almaric in The Phoenician Scheme
  198. Saul Williams in Sinners
  199. Daniel Zolghadri in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
  200. Simon Pegg in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  201. Michael Stuhlbarg in The Amateur
  202. Regé-Jean Page in Black Bag
  203. Richard Ayoade in The Phoenician Scheme
  204. Kamel El Basha in Palestine 36
  205. Ving Rhames in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  206. Yao in Sinners
  207. Harry Shearer in Spinal Tap II: The End Continues
  208. Pedro Pascal in Eddington
  209. John Douglas Thompson in Highest 2 Lowest
  210. Michael Shannon in Nuremberg
  211. Walton Goggins in The Luckiest Man in America
  212. Harvey Guillén in Companion
  213. Rob Reiner in Spinal Tap II: The End Continues
  214. Javier Bardem in F1
  215. Ke Huy Quan in Zootopia 2
  216. Holt McCallany in The Amateur
  217. Ben Mendelsohn in Roofman
  218. Forest Whitaker in Havoc
  219. Austin Butler in Eddington
  220. Ethan Slater in Wicked For Good
  221. Sebastian Stan in Thunderbolts
  222. Carl Lumbly in Captain America: Brave New World
  223. Henry Czerny in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  224. Austin Abrams in Weapons
  225. Paul Walter Hauser in Fantastic Four: The First Steps
  226. John Slattery in Nuremberg
  227. Liam Cunningham in Palestine 36
  228. David Wilmot in Hamnet
  229. Colman Domingo in The Running Man
  230. Tracy Letts in House of Dynamite
  231. Tobias Menzies in F1
  232. Michael Imperioli in Song Sung Blue
  233. Lucas Hedges in Sorry Baby
  234. Anders Danielsen Lie in Sentimental Value
  235. Ramy Youssef in Mountainhead 
  236. Jonathan Bailey in Wicked For Good
  237. Hadis Pakbaten in It Was Just An Accident
  238. Matt Smith in Caught Stealing 
  239. Mark Hamill in The Long Walk 
  240. Keith William Richards in Eephus
  241. Frederick Wiseman in Eephus
  242. Russell J. Gannon in Eephus
  243. Charles Dance in Frankenstein
  244. Jason Clarke in House of Dynamite
  245. Alex Jennings in Ballad of a Small Player
  246. Josh Brolin in The Running Man
  247. Chiwetel Ejiofor in Eleanor the Great
  248. Matthew Maher in Relay 
  249. Stephen Graham in Deliver Me From Nowhere
  250. Thomas Haden Church in Wake Up Dead Man
  251. Italo Martins in The Secret Agent
  252. Igor de Araújo in The Secret Agent
  253. Gabriel Leon in The Secret Agent 
  254. Ken Jeong in KPop Demon Hunters
  255. Ebrahim Azizi in It Was Just An Accident
  256. Paul Walter Hauser in Deliver Me From Nowhere
  257. Jeff Bridges in Tron Ares
  258. Daniel Zolghadri in Lurker
  259. Josh O'Connor in The History of Sound
  260. Jeremy Renner in Wake Up Dead Man
  261. David Dastmalchian in Dust Bunny
  262. Stephen Lang in Sisu: Road to Revenge
  263. Jeff Goldblum in Wicked For Good - 3
  264. Tim Blake Nelson in Captain America: Brave New World
  265. Buddy Guy in Sinners 
  266. Billy Crudup in Jay Kelly
  267. Jacob Batalon in Novocaine
  268. Daniel Ezra in The Running Man
  269. Manuel Gracia-Rulfo in Jurassic World Rebirth
  270. Giancarlo Esposito in Captain America: Brave New World
  271. Colin Hanks in Nuremberg
  272. Andrew Scott in Wake Up Dead Man
  273. Cosmo Jarvis in The Alto Knights
  274. Esai Morales in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  275. Rupert Friend in Companion
  276. Steve Carell in Mountainhead
  277. Billy Howle in Palestine 36
  278. Benny Safdie in Happy Gilmore 2
  279. Chris Addison in Spinal Tap II: The End Continues
  280. Mark O'Brien in Nuremberg 
  281. Chris Evans in Honey Don't
  282. Lee Pace in The Running Man
  283. Jared Harris in House of Dynamite
  284. Anthony Ramos in House of Dynamite
  285. Idris Elba in House of Dynamite
  286. Jim Broadbent in Jay Kelly
  287. Cliff Curtis in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  288. David Thewlis in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  289. Cory Michael Smith in Mountainhead
  290. Tom Bateman in Hedda  - 2.5
  291. Ben Wang in The Long Walk
  292. Adam Sandler in Jay Kelly
  293. Bradley Cooper in Is This Thing On?
  294. Dean Winters in Highest 2 Lowest
  295. Michael Stuhlbarg in After The Hunt
  296. Mark Ruffalo in Mickey 17
  297. Rupert Friend in Jurassic World Rebirth
  298. Holt McCallany in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  299. Danny Ramirez in Captain America: Brave New World
  300. Colin O'Brien in The Monkey
  301. Bad Bunny in Caught Stealing
  302. Beck Bennett in Superman
  303. Bad Bunny in Happy Gilmore 2
  304. Jeremy Strong in Deliver Me From Nowhere
  305. French Stewart in Bob Trevino Like It
  306. Robert Morgan in The Accountant 2 
  307. Nick Offerman in Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning
  308. Nick Offerman in The Life of Chuck
  309. Haley Joel Osment in Happy Gilmore 2
  310. Andy Samberg in The Roses
  311. Michael Cera in The Running Man
  312. Brendan Cowell in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  313. Will Pullen in A Little Prayer
  314. Ray Nicholson in Novocaine - 2
  315. Britain Dalton in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  316. Bruno Bichir in Kiss of the Spider Woman
  317. Gabriel Basso in House of Dynamite
  318. Samuel Bottomley in Anemone
  319. Jemaine Clement in Avatar: Fire And Ash
  320. Evan Peters in Tron: Ares
  321. Jack Champion in Avatar: Fire and Ash
  322. Charlie Day in Honey Don't - 1.5
  323. Asap Rocky in Highest 2 Lowest
  324. The Golfers in Happy Gilmore 2 
  325. Ben Stiller in Happy Gilmore 2 - 1
Next: 2025 Alternate Lead. 

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2025: Russell Crowe in Nuremberg

Russell Crowe did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Hermann Göring in Nuremberg.

Nuremberg follows the trial of the Nazi high command for crimes against humanity through the perspective of psychiatrist Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek).

Russell Crowe depicts the highest ranking Nazi still living Hermann Göring who goes about purposefully surrendering to the US allies. The piece is very much structured as Göring as the representative of the Nazi ideology to be examined and potentially taken down by crusading allied lawyers but more importantly as the scene partner for tête-à-tête of psychiatrist and evil patient in a not entirely unlike Hannibal Lecter kind of way. Although Crowe’s performance is not one that actually emphasizes the evil of the character and is far more interesting in his choices in very much presenting Göring as someone who intends to present himself as a respectable leader simply trying to run and protect his country as he sees fit. A performance that emphasizes the presence of the character, which Russell Crowe has a tremendous presence innately as a performer that isn’t the hardest for him to achieve. As we have from the first scenes between Crowe and Malek, who sadly is not up to snuff in any way shape or form and is overshadowed completely constantly here, Crowe’s performance does elevate the material consistently and makes scenes shine. As Crowe plays this almost jovial quality that doesn’t denote Göring as nice in anyway rather presenting someone who reacts to his confinement as some kind of bemusement to himself more than anything and treats the allies he sees around him including Kelley, as curiosities to him, particularly early on as he pretends not to speak English and Crowe’s whole performance is watching with a calculating and also somewhat degrading stare. 

When Göring reveals his English speaking to Kelley, Crowe’s work often is of this specific state of pretending to be far less than he is and is quite compelling in playing the elements of the character. As Crowe’s delivery of Göring’s claims of being unaware of the final solution, there’s a clever combination Crowe manages to pull of in his eyes and delivery where he manages to earnestly state the claim though with his eyes there’s always a sense of calculation waiting for people to believe his claims with the cunning of a politician and power player behind every false word. Crowe excels in creating the specific narcissism where even in the moments where it seems like he is sharing a mutual interest, like magic, or a mutual endeavor of exposing Rudolf Hess as a fraud, Crowe presents a specific quality that is less of real affection and more of an allowance for personal entertainment. Crowe never portraying direct and genuine warmth between himself and his new confidant, rather presenting a paternalistic quality of someone being amused by for him is essentially is a new underling. Crowe doesn’t soften Göring rather presents a man who believes himself to be in control of this specific situation by essentially pretending to be far less than he in terms of maliciousness but at the same time very much brandishing his intellectual skill at attempting to slip through the hangman’s noose through this particular form of subterfuge. 

Crowe only fully lets in on the character in a moment where he describes a relationship with a Jewish uncle who had invited his family into their home when he was young. Crowe first tells the story as though it is a bit of nostalgic remembrance before getting to the strange specifics that his mother was given the room near the uncle meanwhile his father was given a room with the servants in order for the uncle to have sex with his mother. Crowe’s minor yet pivotal switch in delivery stating that just because man may help does not mean they are your friend, has an incisive delivery. A delivery that speaks to a merciless man of war, and also alluding to a man with the real capability of the extreme antisemitism and atrocities his regime was responsible for. An idea only expanded upon when footage of the concentration camps incenses Kelley to directly confront Göring over his guilt and Crowe lifts the curtain on the man. Presenting just a cold resilience to criticism where anything he parries, Crowe with a confidence in his eyes and defiance in his voice always turns it around back at him with dishonest precedence. Leading to his cross-examine first by American lawyer Robert Jackson (Michael Shannon), who fumbles against Göring’s ability of obfuscation based on minor details. Crowe’s delivery of this scene, along with his physical approach where he almost sits as though he’s at a sofa, emphasizing the dismissive and controlling tone as man getting away with his crimes essentially by the small print. Only when British lawyer Sir David Maxwell Fyfe takes on the cross examination by essentially setting up that Göring would have to be a fool to not be aware and to get him to denounce Hitler do we see Göring fall. Crowe excels in this moment as well by bringing the fragility of the ego where we see the man unable to hide as he’d be a criminal one way or an idiot other, and accepting the former as the lesser of two evils to his deranged view. Crowe’s performance isn’t a big breakdown rather this quiet resignation of a man seeing that there’s no trick for him left other than in his death. Although this is hardly a great film, Crowe makes the most of what he has, even though a better script and a better co-star, this could’ve been a truly unforgettable turn, as is it is a very good one from a great actor.