Monday, 16 December 2024

Alternate Best Actor 2010: Vincent Gallo in Essential Killing

Vincent Gallo did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning the Volpi Cup, for portraying Mohammed in Essential Killing. 

Essential Killing follows a member of the Taliban as he attempts to escape a detention center in Europe as he's pursued by the American military.

That creatively named member is named Mohammed, though really he could just be called the running man as that is the basic nature of the role played by Vincent Gallo. Vincent Gallo a director and actor who is known both onscreen and offscreen for his rather unappealing presence and personality. Gallo is a strange example because he's someone who when you see him and usually when he speaks there is just an innate unlikable quality that exudes from him, however there is something very strange about Gallo because he is oddly captivating to watch despite his presence to the contrary. His role in essential killing theoretically removes one of his most unlikable features being his unpleasant voice and his far more unpleasant words as the character of Mohammed is mute other than grunts and screams related to survival situations. We don't get a deep background on this guy, why he was fighting or anything like that. We just follow him as he kills a soldier, is captured, then needs to escape. The most we get in terms of some sense is a vision in one scene where he sees a woman in the desert, which doesn't say much other than the vaguest of spiritual beliefs. Gallo's performance just shows some awe, establishing I guess that the character has some religious conviction, maybe, but otherwise than that the nature of the role is one in the moment, in reaction and action towards the idea of escape and survival. 

The survival is much of the film as we see Gallo, we see Galllo run, see Gallo run, go Gallo go, see Gallo go, see Gallo step in a bear trap, see Gallo scream, scream Gallo scream, see Gallo breastfeed, breastfeed Gal...actually I'm done with this bit. The performance is a survival film performance where it is very much about the visceral reaction in the moment to the situation or moment. As performances of this ilk goes, I have to say, I don't find Gallo's performance especially captivating beyond a certain point. I think he's perfectly fine in terms of just portraying realistic reactions in terms of the physical wear of the situation, whether that is just general physical exhaustion of his constant running, or more specific intensity of falling through rocky terrain or getting his foot in a bear trap. Gallo's anguish is convincing enough, though I wouldn't say it kind of goes beyond a surface interest. I certainly don't turn my gaze from Gallo here, but he doesn't pull me into the psychological existence of Mohammed, I just see a man running for his life. His checkpoints of this idea are perfectly fine in the moments we get respite when coming across as a random French woman. He portrays that innate desperation and fear of the man in the race, less a dogged conviction of a man with a plan, but just the conviction of a man with the will to survive. The progression of his performance is just of the increased physical exhaustion. It isn't more or less than kind of what can be believable in a general sense. I don't feel I've come to know the character from the progression of this, I don't feel I see this natural change in the state of man's nature either, I feel Gallo just kind of *is* what he needs to be, but doesn't go beyond that. The moments where he is nursed to health by the French woman, we get maybe bits of silent tenderness there, almost like a childlike reduction in the manner of the man from overt fear, however I don't think it still amounts to all that much. It's a good performance, however it isn't more than that. For it to be great, I'd say it would've had to truly elevate the piece to me becoming fully invested in his silence, which I wouldn't say was quite true. 

76 comments:

Robert MacFarlane said...

Gonna change my predictions a bit:

1. Cumming
2. Leung
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Luke Higham said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Gallo
5. Owen

Luke Higham said...

Happy Berenger's gone up.

Jonathan Williams said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Gallo
5. Owen

Bryan L. said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Lucas Saavedra said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

A said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Matt Mustin said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Tony Kim said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Owen
5. Gallo

Dirk Richter said...

Louis: Thoughts on the rest of the cast of The Apprenctice?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Also love that Berenger got upgraded. Amazing how he humanizes such a monster. One insight Berenger said in an interview: He played the start of the scene where he confronts them after Elias is killed as Barnes initially wanting to apologize before swallowing it down.

I need to rewatch Platoon and Blue Velvet soon. Hopper, Berenger, and Day-Lewis are all so close together than I almost want to do a three-way tie.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast?

Matt Mustin said...

Lucas: Is there any other cast?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Are you saving Tim Curry, if not, can I have your rating and thoughts on him.

Anonymous said...

Louis: ratings and thoughts on the cast of Legend?

Perfectionist said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Gallo
5. Owen

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the Oscar shortlists.

Shaggy Rogers said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Gallo
5. Owen

Louis Morgan said...

Dirk:

Donovan - (One of those very mannered performances that is entirely convincing, as this isn't at all Donovan's typical presence yet you just immediately buy him as Fred Trump without exception. He's terrific even though limited in bringing the constant sense of exasperated disappointment towards his sons bringing the same blunt annoyed quality in each moment of someone who has never suffered fools up till this point. Contrasting that though he's effective in showing the man losing his mental faculties in showing the formerly powerful personality losing his grasp in a particular tangible way because of the two sides he makes as convincing.)

Bakalova - (Her performance works as an effective victim within the crosshairs, showing in her early scenes a more natural humanity who is contrastingly earnest in every way and just direct in her emotions without any particular compromise with being herself. Her performance naturally works in contrast by just being honest in her emotions without any play about them. Her portrayal of her natural heartache at first that segues to just a somber disgust brings the right sense of a commentary and is moving in showing how she begins to bright and appreciative and is spent by the end of it.)

Luke:

Curry - 4(Curry's performance obviously is amplified by the sound design and the extremely impressive makeup job, where the work within his visual intro is rather incredible. Having said that, Curry impressively is able to act through the makeup and unlike I'd say the other makeup performers in the film you do get some real nuance within the archetype. While Curry certainly fulfilled that aspect with the booming voice and the intense yet alluring eyes, he goes further in the moments of speaking of his desire for the princess. Curry could've played it as one note "I'm evil and want things" type of approach, however Curry underplays the lines presenting it as genuine fascination with her rather than something over the top and just part of the bigness of the character. When having the "courting" conversation with Sara, Curry is at the height of his work and in turn it is the height of the film because his expression manage to get beyond his literal devilish face, to show this curious attempt at tenderness and a sense of real need of Darkness ot make the connection with her. Something plot point wise ends up being pretty simple and basically gets dropped in the climax however Curry makes the most of the scene.)

Anonymous:

Cruise - (Not his finest hour and probably one of the least confident performances Cruise ever gave even within work I don't love of his. As Cruise seems a little not very Cruiseish because of that quality. I don't think he's even terrible exactly, he's more of attempting to find somethings into the part, I just don't think he finds it. A problem being the role being SO vague Cruise in turn honestly seems lost. Not sure how to play the hero, or the hapless hero or something successfully in-between.)

Sara - (She's very bland as the princess side and even has some rather stilted line deliveries in there, particularly in her one on one with Curry despite the visual transformation. When she plays the fully evil version of her character, she certainly goes for it, and is a little bit of fun, however I wouldn't say it makes up too much ground in the scheme of things.)

The other creature performances are off-putting, I'd say purposefully, though more so on Scott's choice here to make all the fantasy creatures, evil or good, rather alien.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Where would you rank Curry for Supporting Actor 1985.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Documentary:

Doesn't surprise me in the least that Super/Man was left off here given the branch's aversion to mainstream recognition for the most part.

International:

I will admit I was hoping beyond hope we'd get a jaw dropper with Perez being left off, but alas we are likely doomed to see one of the worst winners the category has ever seen. Otherwise, always enjoy my watchlist.

Makeup and Hairstyling:

Well deserved recognition for A Different Man and The Substance hope they make the final round. Not surprised Furiosa missed out given so much was redone work from Fury Road.

One sore thumb in Perez, because as I did find Gascon's drug dealer makeup pretty ridiculous. But everything else is fine to good.

And always enjoy a swerve like Waltzing with Brando showing up , based on the trailer, potentially deserved.

Score:

Funny Beetlejuice and Gladiator can qualify, where the most memorable work was reused work, but Dune can't...typical Score branch.

The Substance here and Sound showing some weakness after the Globe support. And I'd certainly take it's score (along with A Different Man's) over Blitz, Romulus, Blink Twice, Emilia Perez, Gladiator II, Hororizon, or Wicked's.

Sound:

Big misses from Furiosa, Twisters the Substance, and certainly would take both over much of the lineup.

VFX:

Cool with Here missing, and for me one of the weakest aspects of Furiosa to me so don't hate that miss, though Gladiator II's Baboon should've kept it from anywhere near any best of list.

Anonymous said...

Louis: your directors and casts for a 90’s, 2000’s, 2010’s, and 2020’s version of Legend?

Dirk Richter said...

1. Leung
2. Cumming
3. Hoffman
4. Gallo
5. Owen

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Thoughts on the uses of music in these scenes?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw6zrT_K_vM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2l2h4pMrZiM

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this scene

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L5kZ5hOUO78

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: What are your thoughts on Blue Velvet's sound mixing?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Carry On.

BRAZINTERMA said...

5º Vincent Gallo
4º Clive Owen
3º Philip Seymour Hoffman
2º Alan Cumming
1º Tony Leung Chiu Wai

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

Not my favorite Tarantino needledrop to be perfectly honest. Out of the time being fairly on the nose in setting up the dread of the Tate murders, which isn't my favorite aspect of the film to be perfectly honest. And while the airport walk with Cliff behind with the bag is a very nice touch, the rest is a testament of the non-Menke languid editing where, while I don't find it truly glacial, it is a bit drawn out and for me diminishes the use of the song as punctuation as compared to the very best uses of music by Tarantino.

Now the Sopranos is also theoretically on the nose with "head filled with ice" as we have Fat Dom's literally frozen head, however sometimes on the nose works perfectly as the song underscores the squaring of some business though that will set more fire in the feud Phil first more indirectly with the corpse disposal then the explosion. A song choice that sets that distinct mood that isn't exactly satisfying but there is a certain easy calm about it though a cautious one.

Anonymous:

A scene that suggests maybe I was a little too hard on Cruise, and common to my earliest reviews my feelings about the over the top scenes with his family after coming back might've weighed too much on my overall decision. This is genuinely good work from Cruise in the somber but clear way of Cruise's delivery initially as the guilt begins to overwhelm him and pierce through his soul even so brutally in his breakdown. A quiet power to his work, though I will say you do see a bit of over excess on Stone's part in this film in the needless cutaway in the scene. But overall far more restraint is shown and Cruise's work does resonate.

Matt:

Lynchian and particularly fantastic because the nature of the film doesn't necessarily require this mixing theoretically as a noir, however Lynch's choice to do so forces a luridness that goes deeper psychologically for that. Such as the opening where the sound takes from the idyllic Americana underscored by Blue Velvet before the sound takes us even more than the visuals to the festering darkness of those ants on the severed ear. But take any moment that Lynch plays with there and there is such precision in the technique. For example the final moment of brilliance for me in the face off where it goes silent for a moment, cutting the score, focusing on the strange sounds as Frank unloads randomly into the tv and the yellow man, before laying the score back, with the sound of Frank's mask building together as a most unique orchestral swell with a certain gunshot as the climactic note of the sound.

Luke:

I originally had longer thoughts for the Carry On cast, sans Bateman who I'm saving but were lost despite putting them in an auto saving doc...anyway. Egerton I think gives an endearing straightforward average performance so to speak where bringing the right sense of gravity and just has a nice earnest chemistry with Carson. Brings the right emotional gravitas. Nothing amazing but both solidly good. And I did like Carson as well largely for that chemistry but thought she effectively segued to the more dramatic conviction moments later on. Deadwyler I don't think really does much with her exposition device. Rossi I think manages to be ridiculous in a part that allowed for a little overacting yet was still too much...still don't know how he pulled that Emily The Criminal performance out...Norris I will say is a little too bad that he's basically gone back to the type of roles he had before Breaking Bad, but did think he did what he could with it.

Egerton - 4
Carson - 3.5
Deadwyler - 2.5
Rossi - 2
Norris - 3

Louis Morgan said...

Ripley cast Ranking:

1. Andrew Scott
2. Maurizio Lombardi
3. Johnny Flynn
4. Margherita Buy
5. Kenneth Lonergan
6. Bokeem Woodbine
7. John Malkovich
8. Fisher Stevens
9. Dakota Fanning
10. Louis Hoffman
11. Eliot Sumner

Matt Mustin said...

Glad you're saving Bateman. And totally agree on Blue Velvet's sound, I think it's some of the greatest mixing in any film honestly.

Matt Mustin said...

Is Hopper still your favourite performance as Ripley?

Bryan L. said...

Blue Velvets’ sound mixing is actually what I think of the second-most about the film, after Hopper of course.

Marcus said...

Louis: Thoughts on your top 6 from Ripley.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: What's your category placement for Bateman.

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the Japanese dub of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcD_2cphVDw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHCEebTdeoY

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on the trailers for Karate Kid: Legends and Superman.

Michael McCarthy said...

I managed to see an advance screening of A Complete Unknown last night. I would say it’s an above average if not great musical biopic, it benefits from being *perfectly* cast and quite well directed, however it’s intentionally underwritten in spots in a way that doesn’t always work, presumably with the intention of highlighting Dylan’s enigmatic nature. Norton is MVP, I’m glad he’s building traction.

Chalamet: 4/4.5
Norton: 5
Fanning: 3.5
Barbaro: 4
Fogler: 3
McNairy: 3
Butz: 3.5
Harrison: 3
Holbrook: 4

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the Superman trailer.

Dirk Richter said...

Michael: What were your thoughts on Barbaro and Norton?

Matt Mustin said...

Superman trailer gave me chills.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

With regards to Superman, that is how you cut a trailer.

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

Hopper is still #1 for me and honestly part of that is that chemistry with Ganz, but Scott is very close and hope if they do Ripley's Game eventually that they get a great co-star for him in that one.

Luke:

Supporting.

8000':

I mean all three are fairly decent renditions I will say in evoking a general feeling of the three performances.

Anonymous:

Karate Kid looks fine though not quite seeing the relevance of the connection yet other than the obvious selling point, and was hoping the trailer would illuminate why Mr. Han and Daniel are teaming up particularly in terms of chemistry. Didn't quite get that, but could be good regardless as a slightly more serious approach than what Cobra Kai has been doing.

Watched the Superman trailer a few times, and the more I watched it the more I'm liking it. Obviously built on iconography and can't complain with the very much embracing the "super" aspect and the earnestness of the character in the imagery here particularly the use of Krypto and the shielding the young girl scene. And the stylization of the Williams theme I thought was pretty ideal, and do not mind the reuse at all as I do think you can take it as James Bond style definitive and should just be an aspect of the character. But that stylization is kind of also the trailer as we get some modern aspects with the old school and that blend here anyways was definitely working and seemed balanced in the right way. Also will never say no to some Hoult as a villain. Obviously could all not work in the end but this was a strong first impression.

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

Scott - (His performance here is rather fascinating because of the certain degree of averageness about his Ripley in a way, which this isn't to say he makes Ripley in any way an average man. But what Scott does is humanize Ripley by in no way making the character impervious to the situations or the challenges of it. He isn't perfect and Scott curiously brings you into Ripley's mindset by making him less than perfect. Throughout the series Scott portrays the quiet frustrations of Ripley as he calculates moments of choice in proceeding with his advancement in society. There aren't easy moments rather we see that sense of intelligence but honest intelligence that Scott plays it as. He isn't just brilliant and doesn't share with us a far away concept, he brings us within his thought process just through minor nuances in his reactions. Reactions that weirdly humanize Ripley because he shows us the effort the man does have to take even though he is a genius, he doesn't play it as easy and by doing so makes Ripley less distant. That isn't to say that Scott hides the psychopathy because that is certainly not the case, but what Scott brings there is the greater ease of the character's psychopathy. Whenever he commits his most heinous crimes Scott's performance presents it as merely the logical, and easiest choice for Ripley in the moment without hesitation. In these moments taking almost a reptilian predator's efficiency in the kills, as there is no mercy possible, it is just what Ripley is doing and will do without hesitation. But contrasting that again living the high life and lower life depending on the situation in his impersonation of Dickie, Scott again weirdly brings us into the world of the little moments of speaking to us, though never to the people he's fooling in seeing the man presenting himself a certain way to pretend to be hiding his guilt as Dickie, though isn't hiding his guilt as Ripley when confronted by the inspector, or presenting himself as the completely innocent Ripley who can't believe any of it. Scott naturally jumps from any different shade of Ripley per the situation where there is a captivating quality again letting us in on the method of the illusion and creating a Ripley where he lets us in to a degree. No that there aren't still ambiguities naturally there are but Scott never uses it to be too vague or too exact, finding a balance that makes him the villain certainly still, yet allows us to see within the mind our protagonist.)

Louis Morgan said...

Lombardi - (Well not to get too Frank towards Ben from Blue Velvet, but he is extremely suave to say the least. Lombardi brings this ease towards the detective of the man who too is constantly calculating in thought that feels like an actual proper opponent to Ripley, where in the other two versions you never really feel that sense from any one investigating the crimes. With Lombardi you feel he is on Ripley's trail the whole time with often just his piercing eyes where you see the man trying to decipher the truth and love his delivery with the eyes often complimenting each other to dig towards a deeper truth each time. Lombardi has a great style that makes every single scene of his wonderful to watch because he is within his work just captivating to watch him work the case, and reminded a lot of Jouvet in Quai des orfèvres in his approach. He excels though as the investigation goes on breaking his calm appropriately in moments of having to deal with far less competent individuals into the investigation or particularly the biggest break which is his perfect reaction to the final revelation in the series.)

Flynn - (As noted before far less complex of a Greenleaf than played by Law, although that isn't a slight on Flynn that is just the writing behind the character. This Dickie mostly is just a playboy just doing nothing on his parent's money taking interest in Tom just as a distraction, and while slightly duplicitous with Marge, he's not fully manipulative. Flynn though works well in playing into the note of just someone looking for these distractions wherever they might be, including with Tom who Flynn honestly plays as treating fairly respectably even when Ripley does something nefarious. His performance in many ways emphasizes a certain innocence, not that his Dickie is in any way perfect, but Flynn plays him very much as just an average, albeit wealthy, guy who doesn't really have any way of being on the level of Ripley in terms of manipulations and calculations. Even when breaking the news of kicking Tom out, Flynn presents it as just a very straightforward dismissal with no big overtures of disgust or anything else, just someone he doesn't want to see anymore, which outlays a certain privilege however presented as Flynn as a man just tailoring his life as he believes it should be not as any overt pompous control however.)

Buy - (Brings a nice life in quality to theoretically a servicing role, but any chance she does have offers a little bit more character to the proceedings. You are granted the sense of her performance, which is technically just fulfilling a hotel's roles but just with a bit more personality, however in each instance brings an honest quality that fills out the moments she has.)

Lonergan - (Glad he never yelled out "Great parenting". Anyway, actually is completely good in just bringing the right sense of a completely exasperated parent in his early scenes that eventually transfers to grieving parent where we see the weight of the relationship with Dickie change from just annoyance to genuine sadness. A limited role but very well played.)

Woodbine - (Basically Mike Milligan as a private detective but it works.)

Anonymous said...

Louis, thoughts on the Florida Film Critics Circle being the first awards body to award Culkin for Best Leading Actor?

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Hey, finally an honest group. I will say in a way the critics groups backing up the fraud I find more irksome than the industry awards, since there's no reason for them to be so beholden to the studio mandate yet they follow suit every time.

Tony Kim said...

Anonymous: They also awarded Best Film to The Beast and gave Seydoux Best Actress. It's good to see at least one regional group do their own thing.

Luke: Has anyone actually argued that Bateman might be a co-lead? He seemed to be firmly Supporting to me.

Luke Higham said...

Tony: I asked that question so I'd know where to put him on my saves document.

Tony Kim said...

Luke: Ah, I see, cool.

Dirk Richter said...

Louis: Thoughts on the rest of the Ripley cast?

Louis Morgan said...

Wolf Hall The Mirror and the Light cast top five:

1. Mark Rylance
2. Damian Lewis
3. Timothy Spall
4. Lilit Lesser
5. Harry Melling

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Is Rylance's collective performance across Wolf Hall and The Mirror and the Light now your favorite TV performance ever, or is that still Cranston in Breaking Bad.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Unless you're still committed to doing a write-up on Rylance in the future, your thoughts on his work and the rest of the top 5 plus Phillips, Walter, Pryce and Jennings.

And if you've finished your TV viewings for 2024, your top 10s in each category.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you're still doing a write-up, any possibility we could get it after the 2024 reviews. Been waiting 9+ years for it.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Is it also a career peak for Lewis and Spall.

Dirk Richter said...

Louis: You can ignore my earlier request regarding the Ripley cast; I'll just ask again later. Wouldn't want you to get carpal tunnel.

Louis Morgan said...

The Seed of the Sacred Fig Cast Ratings:

Golestani - 4.5
Zareh - 4
Rostami - 4.5
Maleki - 4.5
Akhshi - 3.5

J96 said...

Louis, your top 10 superhero films of all time? I know Watchmen is in there.

Mine would be roughly:

The Dark Knight
Logan
Spiderman Across the Spider Verse
Spiderman Into the Spider Verse
The Batman
The Incredibles
Watchmen
Superman the Movie
Captain America the Winter Soldier
X Men Days of Future Past

J96 said...

Louis, your op 10 opening credits and closing credits sequences?

Tony Kim said...

Watched Conclave and Carry-On a few days ago. I actually enjoyed the former essentially the same way I enjoyed the latter: as a pulpy thriller at its core that's more entertaining the less seriously you take it.

Fiennes - 4.5
Tucci, Lithgow, Castellitto - 4
Rossellini - 3.5/4
Msamati, Koman, O'Byrne, Diehz - 3

Egerton, Carson - 3.5
Bateman - 4
Deadwyler - 3 (How did she get billed below Carson?)
Norris - 3
Everyone else is basically in the range between 3 and "they're in the movie".

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I'll have to think about that one. 

Luke:

Ask again about TV top tens in the 1st of the year predictions.

Let me get to Rylance last.

Lewis - (His performance is one that particularly utilizes the nearly 10 years since the first series as Lewis wears age within his performance and creates an even more paranoid and petulant Henry. While there are the occasional moments of seeing the leader he is supposed to be, more frequently we see the man who never quite grew up, with some honestly comedic moments where this most comes out that Lewis plays directly as such, particularly when he states his ridiculous choice to come into disguise when coming to see Anne of Cleves or even more so his complaints about her after their wedding night. When not being comedic he is terrifying however in showing the intensity that alludes to his danger as a King when he threatens his own daughter or his council for not getting her to do what he wants. He's particularly terrific in the moments with Rylance where he treads between seeming still trusting him and other moments where we see the man becoming exasperated by what he believes to be his once loyal subject. That isn't to say he isn't without pathos, as he really brings such genuine heartbreak in the scene after Jane Seymour's death, and even in the final moment contemplating Cromwell's fate, Lewis is amazing bringing a certain sensitivity mixed in with blunt dismissal wrapped together to suggest an old loyalty yet still dismiss it in the end.)

Louis Morgan said...

Spall - (A great prick for the lack of a better word, Spall plays just into making Norfolk as brazen and hideous and possible, nailing it consistently by making it so easy to hate him immensely as he delivers every hideous word without hesitation or care. Spall brings though such self-satisfaction of a man built upon his privilege and Spall brings that ease of the horribleness of a man who just thinks his right to be as bad as he is. Spall sneers most perfectly here in just making Norfolk a constant reminder of this old brass with a particular venomous undercurrent and sense of unearned superiority that is something he constantly brandishes with almost grotesque disregard.)

Lesser - (Thought she brought really a great deal of complexity to Mary particularly in terms of the possibility of playing a character who many characters want to use as various pawns. Lesser manages to play the layers of first of the wannabe martyr by presenting the utmost righteousness, then later the overly dutiful daughter as seen fit. She undercuts this nicely in her private scenes with Cromwell where she brings such a sense of intelligence in the way she reveals the much more complex person beyond the presentations she needs to perform in order to survive court. Having particular this fantastic way of saying all of her emotions beneath the lines in her subtle facial changes, as she mostly speaks moments of performative statements, yet what she really is thinking is always artfully shown within that by Lesser.)

Melling - (The writing largely shifts what I thought would be Richard Rich's role to Wriothesley. Melling though makes for the proper weasel regardless, by in the early scenes showing the theoretical value in the cutting nature of the man who seemingly speaks right to the core of matters, though in fact speaks to the core of matters that will serve him. Melling makes the most of key reactions to build towards the betrayal by showing the man taking in certain statements almost as a bank to be used against Cromwell. He's then terrific in the later scenes in showing that come to fruition through with complication as Melling effectively drifts and alludes towards enough of a sense of guilt that he comes in and out of throughout the scenes. Showing that it never quite gets the best of him, but it comes close.)

Phillips - (Phillips gives a nicely sincere performance because she very much plays Jane as someone who doesn't have some grand plan as so many and particularly in contrast to Claire Foy's Anne. Phillips shows her manner as someone who genuinely wants to love Henry, and is particularly good in the questioning of his choices scenes because she plays it as wholly sincere, even perhaps naive, but honest to someone who doesn't see the world in the greys so many of the characters do. She brings the straightforward quality that effectively contrasts against everyone else essentially in the series.)

Walter - (Her performance is regulated to only a few scenes, but brings the right sense of political cutting in the few moments she does. And to her credit doesn't fall into the cold viciousness she's been cast as in Last Duel and Succession, she nicely eases on that enough to just show someone comfortable with the game and just speaks to that without overt cruelty however.)

Jennings - (Plays well the opponent of Cromwell who is the most direct, playing it with a certain patrician dismissal of the man, but not thinly. Rather Jennings effectively portrays it almost as him seeing Cromwell consistently as some fad that will be gone away sooner than later and requires not much more energy than that. He's especially striking in his final scene with Rylance where he that directness almost seems to create empathy, though it is not, but Jennings plays it well as basically one expert player to another giving him the bluntest truth.)

Louis Morgan said...

J96:

Superhero films:

The Batman
Batman Begins
Captain America: The Winter Soldier
The Dark Knight
The Incredibles
Logan
Spider-man Across The Spider-Verse
Spider-man 2
Spider-man Into the Spider-Verse
Superman

Note: I think there are great things in Watchmen (Opening Credits, Haley and Morgan's performances) but think it has many flaws as well.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the direction of Liz and the Blue Bird and Look Back.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Aside from The Brutalist and Nosferatu, which films do you still need to see before posting your 2024 top ten.

Dirk Richter said...

Louis, on the subject of '24 films, do you have interest in catching up with any of these?

My First Film
Sasquatch Sunset
In a Violent Nature
My Old Ass
Good One
Touch

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Well there's a few more than that remaining, like Nickel Boys and Hard Truths for example and OF COURSE Vengeance Most Fowl.

Dirk:

I'll probably be watching some of those. But I can already say I'm not particularly interested in In A Violent Nature.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could you check out How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies for Usha Seamkhum, curious to see how you take to her work.

Dirk Richter said...

Louis: Fair enough, I haven't seen it myself but I'd heard from a couple people who really liked it.

Thoughts on the rest of the Ripley cast?

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I intend to at some point.

Dirk:

Malkovich - (He's only in it briefly but ideal as the art collector type, with maybe a slight meta moment in his initial appearance. But an example of Malkovich just playing into type that works.)

Stevens - (He's in it for like a minute but it's a good minute of playing an uncaring and direct banker.)

Fanning - (I've yet to be impressed by a Fanning performance fully. There's just something that always feels a little off about her performances for me, or that she just goes for kind of a surface/obvious note. I feel that is frequently the case here, which is okayish for the moments where Marge is just being lost, but when she needs to play deeper shades I found her a little lacking. And there's a lot of strong material for the character in terms of her unexpected switch that could've been more enigmatic in playing against Scott, but Fanning plays it all so straight that it ends up making her too easy to read in turn, seeming less of a danger the whole time.)

Hoffman - (Has like a minute of screen time and just wasn't notable one way or the other.)

Sumner - (A casting choice that is very purposeful however something that needs to also have a purpose. As on one end have Freddie be trasngender, non-binary or some shade of that, then the series should deal with it in some way, or if not the performance needs to be such a great approach that there is no distraction since they are just that good that you believe the character no matter what. Unfortunately Sumner's performance putting behind all that, just isn't particularly good. Very artificial deliveries and just put on the whole time. There's no sense of the history of Freddie with Dickie and just plays an obvious dislike of Ripley but without really a lot behind the most surface note. Compared to PSH where you understood so much of Freddie from his few scenes, here Sumner just makes the role seem excessively simple yet doesn't even play that simple note particularly effectively.)

Bryan L. said...

Me today: www.youtube.com/watch?v=n57aQQsQiwc

Jonathan Williams said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Langella in Masters Of The Universe.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Rylance's performance across both is one of mastery of the craft and where you see his incredible talent in such unquestionable control. As Rylance masters the small in so many moments of just having that innate power of presence within the microcosm of thought. Something that ironically shares a similar quality to Scofield in A Man For All Seasons, where the intelligence of an intelligent man ends up being such a captivating quality through the performer. Rylance achieves that with such ease where he brings you right within Cromwell's thinking in any given moment, something that sounds simple but isn't at all. Because there is such tremendous nuance that Rylance is able to express on his face, and how much he can change through a slight change in that. Rylance pulls us right within the man's mind so powerfully that we are part of it, while also just seeing the immense power of the man as he exudes a very certain command, a command however in the ease. The ease though that is of calculation but also tenderness and thought. Something that Rylance can be so warm, and heartfelt in one moment, as he can be so calculating cold in another. All natural to the situation to the way Rylance is never just a scene, he always comments on it, yet somehow maintains this natural ease within a scene to never artificially so. Rylance never steals scenes, he just simply owns them in the most fascinating of ways. Rylance is not quiet in any singular way, he expresses himself differently depending on each and every character, finding variation. From his greater deference but also undercurrent of fear when talking to Henry. The sense of keen admiration when speaking to Wolsey where you suddenly see so much youth in him. The graciousness and warmth when speaking to his sons and his closest assistants. The exasperation and hidden, and eventually not so hidden exasperations for the men whom he has no respect for like Norfolk. Or the wisdom and calm consideration when speaking to the Queens and princesses as you see the calculation mixed in with concern. Rylance no leaves no relationship just for one moment, but shows the way Rylance both plays to each person, however must also be a different person. And it is in the mastery by the way Rylance makes it seem all so easy in the way he commands the changes in Cromwell, which Rylance is so powerful in his reserve to begin yet whenever he breaks that reserve it is cutting right into the heart of a moment so extraordinary effectively. When Rylance tells Rich to "Look at him" with honest rage, you sit up just as the characters do because Rylance unleashes such intensity at a moment's notice and coming from his reserve makes it all the power pointed. But when we see Cromwell going through nightmares it is that much more stressful because Rylance makes it as natural, as potent, as any performer presenting such wretched emotions and makes it all so natural at that much more penetrating by the shield we see come undone. The same is when the moment he named earl, and Rylance revealing the heartbreak in Cromwell for all that he's lost and all the people who can't see his loss, is absolutely devastating in the way you sense the years of loss in the man's eyes in a second and see how far a journey it was making so tragic at a moment's notice. The final episode truly is just Rylance running the viewer through the emotional ringer, because we see so many breaks and there is so much power in each and everyone. Where we see the man fundamentally broken by his defeat, yet still cunning and fighting for his life, and Rylance gives such detail to this breach, through the moments of anger, sorrow but even tenderness such as his goodbye to Thomas Brodie-Sangster's Ralph that is particularly poignant. Rylance masters this character like few performers do where indeed he could just read the phonebook as Cromwell and be captivating, yet there is so much he finds within every moment of the man's life, to be so much, so many things, yet so singularly one person all the same.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Well happy birthday, even with the feelings that song evokes.

Jonathan:

Langella - (Langella more than anything just goes for it, and doesn't really put on any hesitation towards playing Skeletor. he wants to make him as real as he can be and particular does bother to actually act with his eyes which notable given that it would be easy enough to just scream the line. Langella though plays the role with conviction and care even. As much as owning sort of the overt pageantry of the voice and the extreme mannerisms, he does attempt nuance, like his own line about the loneliness of evil. I still wouldn't say it saves the film, nor would I say one needs to seek out his performance from the film, but he is good within a film that definitely is not.)