Showing posts with label Will Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Will Smith. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 February 2022

Best Actor 2021: Results

5. Javier Bardem in Being the Ricardos - Bardem wholly fails to evoke Desi Arnaz just as he fails to seem anything but awkward in bringing the film's "witty" dialogue to screen.
4. Will Smith in King Richard - Smith delivers a charming, humorous and passionate performance here, even if he might be just a little too cautious when touching upon the negative aspects of his character.

Best Scene: Words of encouragement to Venus.
3. Andrew Garfield in Tick Tick...Boom - Garfield puts every ounce of himself into this role and that energy suits the role of Jonathan Larson extremely well.

Best Scene: "Why"
2. Denzel Washington - The Tragedy of Macbeth - See Cumberbatch thoughts.
 
Best Scene:  Is This A Dagger Which I See Before Me
1. Benedict Cumberbatch in The Power of the Dog - Good prediction Calvin, Robert and moviefilm. I love both performances. Both give amazing performances. Both match their unique challenges, are captivating to watch, and give such complex and layered turns. I can't fault either, I can only praise the brilliance of each. So even when I make my decision it won't be that I prefer one, it will be that I just settled on one. 

Best Scene: Rolling a cigarette
Next: 2021 Alternate Supporting

Best Actor 2021: Will Smith in King Richard

Will Smith won his Oscar from his third acting Oscar nomination for portraying Richard Williams in King Richard.

King Richard tells the story of the Williams sisters through the story of their father raising them to be tennis champions from a young age. A wholly fine film though definitely a bit drawn out for its simplistic approach to the material.

Will Smith is an actor who hasn't always been one of my favorites. Although he certainly has an overabundance of charm that suits him well for straightforward leading turns, he can struggle a bit when confronted with either tricky, or more complex characters. The role of Richard Williams is honestly a little bit of both, as it is in part the type of role that plays to Smith's strengths while also technically being a challenge by not being just a simple hero. Richard Williams by all accounts is a whole lot of a man, and idiosyncratic in more ways than one. Right down to his particular way of speaking and even acting in the particular way he pushed his daughters to be champions. Smith's performance is wholly effective in portraying the mannerisms of Williams. His very distinct way of talking, even his extremely hunched over posture Smith brings to the role here. Unlike his turn as Ali, I think Smith fashions this in a way that is convincing within the performance. It feels a little much at first, but ends up feeling true to the character. He most importantly makes it feel just a part of the character after awhile.

Where Smith succeeds in this role is just bringing his charm and charisma even within the fashioned personal style of Richard Williams. Smith has that star quality that comes off the screen well here, and makes for an endearing presence in portraying the character's various moments of essentially inspiration via pushing his daughters again and again. Smith does hit the right note of earnestness here and really prevents himself from overdoing it which would be very easy with the general tone of this film. Smith though is present in these scenes and brings the right tone for each of these scenes. His reactions capture the moments of frustration whenever there is a setback, or the joy whenever there is a triumph. He hits his marks consistently in this sense. When the film wants Smith to deliver a one liner, that particular Smith brings his comedic sensibilities along with the role. What I think is best here, is that Smith succeeds in hitting the comedic lines without resorting to going back to fully Will Smith. They are still Smithesque in the side eye casual cool but he still modulates the performance for it to be naturally as Richard Williams. 

So much of the film wants to push for how inspirational of a story this is, and the film does this one of two ways. This is either Richard disregarding doubters or potential exploiters with derision or by speaking warm support to both his daughters as they climb the ladder of tennis success. Smith effectively executes the moments of Richard presenting his particular way of wisdom as these blunt as possible deliveries of the man who will speak as he sees fit. He has this kind of clarity by in a way, as a man who so easily projects that kind of exact perspective of his. Smith on the other end of supporting his daughters Smith naturally exudes just this warmth and his eyes always seem to convey just the purest of belief in his daughters. Although the sort of inspirational intent of some of these scenes might be a little too obviously calibrated at times, Smith does hit his marks. Smith is an earnest performer, and that passion he brings comes across naturally here. Again though I must credit Smith in even performing these moments with just enough passivity to still be Richard Williams not Will Smith. 

Where the film shows its limitations is when it ever attempts to really exam any negativity around Richard. It seems like the filmmakers wanted to recognize that there are controversial elements of the man, but only just touch on them a bit. It never quite rectifies the idea where it touches upon that his at times he has dictatorial mandates, or kingly to put it nicer, which sometimes send mixed messages like making the girls lives about tennis then punishing them for celebrating too much. He wants their lives to be tennis but then demands very specific things from their coaches based on his personal thoughts of how things should be handled over their advice. This is a complex idea that isn't really given much complexity in this film. It more of touches upon them briefly noting that Richard can be frustrating, even hard to live with, but never goes much deeper than that. In turn Smith isn't challenged too much in this aspect though I guess to his credit the choice here makes it so basically Smith just needs to consistently portray Richard. Here as the film implies, even if it doesn't ring fully true, that any frustrations with Richard are the same as his successes, which is through his just being his eccentric self.

I'll admit I put Smith in the worst possible position by re-watching his film after The Power of the Dog and The Tragedy of Macbeth, and seeing the masterful and complex performances of Washington and Cumberbatch back to back. In comparison, although Richard Williams is clearly a complex figure in reality, here Smith just needs to be this inspirational figure who might be just a bit too eccentric for his own good at times. Richard doesn't really change, he remains just this consistent figure who is who he is and stays as he is throughout the film. This is as written however though and not on Smith I will grant. Instead Smith is good in repeating the old favorites of the one liners towards those questioning his choices or the passionate speeches. When Richard cuts down social welfare checking on his family, Smith speaks the fierce intensity of his belief that he's doing right with anger towards those he believes are doing wrong. He hits his humor in his bemusement as he ignores seemingly one good deal after another for his daughters knowing the better one is coming, or by just being his atypical self among the "posh" tennis crowd. Even when the film mentions some of the potentially ridiculous things Richard said, it is played off largely just for Richard to get the best of the reporter questioning him by just staying charming even when dismissing and technically insulting. This isn't through any change, but just through Richard maintaining that same eccentricity in Smith's performance. This after all is immediately followed by Richard's better self as he defends his daughter from the doubting reporter, which again Smith hits with the needed passion. 
 
Even when their coach (Jon Bernthal), who is shown to be a wholly positive figure in the story, questions Richard it is mainly played for laughs and Smith's performance is still of the same stubborn yet confident man with an air of righteousness. Probably the biggest variation we get is when his wife (Aunjanue Ellis) raises even bigger questions about his character, and the film hits a little bit of a false note as his wife's take down of his faults somehow ends with her propping him up, despite the fact that he never admits that he might be a little wrong. Again I hesitate to blame Smith, because Smith's reactions are fine in showing some sense of frustration but any real depth is more so conveyed by Ellis's performance than Smith's. Smith still shows the guy being himself just a little more frustrated. Although there is that minor variation, more could've been said by Smith's performance between the lines here even if Smith isn't technically at all bad in the scene. Almost to make sure we don't question him too much this is immediately followed by Richard talking up Venus and making sure he knows he believes in her, speaking about not wanting to let his girls runaway from the world the way he had to from racists as a younger man. As much as I think the positioning of the scene is devised to make us forget about Richard's flaws mentioned in the previous scene by showing him at his most sympathetic, I'd be lying if I didn't say Smith delivers with this scene. Again to Smith's credit he does deliver on a greater emotional turmoil even if still highlighting the inspirational overtones as he speaks of a trauma that helped to propel him to wanting more. I think one could argue that Smith might've mined more depth in certain moments, particularly in that fight with Ellis, but he doesn't. His performance instead remains perhaps too consistent and intent on maintaining Richard as a more simple heroic figure within the film. Smith succeeds in being that figure, and that is clearly a major intention of the film. Although even within that intention the potential for a bit more depth here or there seemed possible but instead we get basically get just a crowd pleasing performance for this crowd pleasing film. While that in itself is an achievement, the possibility of doing that while realizing a bit more complexity in Richard seemed possible, and the two ideas are not mutually exclusive from one another. What we instead see are the strengths and limitations of Smith as a performer. We get his humor, his charm and his earnestness, but we also get an apparent hesitation to ever seem less than affable onscreen. In turn Smith delivers a fine performance here, however a greater depth of character did seem possible even within the confines of this tale of inspiration.

Saturday, 12 February 2022

Best Actor 2021

And the Nominees Are:

Andrew Garfield in Tick Tick...Boom
 
Benedict Cumberbatch in The Power of the Dog
 
Will Smith in King Richard

Denzel Washington in The Tragedy of Macbeth
 
Javier Bardem in Being the Ricardos

Monday, 25 October 2010

Best Actor 2006: Results

5. Will Smith  in The Pursuit of Happyness- Smith simply is not very good here, he simply never is authentic as the person he is suppose to be playing, he always stays as just Will Smith, rather than Chris Gardner.
4. Peter O'Toole in Venus- Peter O'Toole is very strong showing the life, and lust of a washed up actor. The film is not particularly good, but O'Toole always stands out well despite this.
3. Ryan Gosling in Half Nelson- Gosling gives a brilliant understated performance, as a drug addict teacher. He never overplays single scene, and stays subtle almost throughout, except a few key scenes where he stands out incredibly well.
2. Leonardo DiCaprio in Blood Diamond- DiCaprio despite some weakness of the film's script, is incredibly strong here, in both a sense of creating interesting character and dealing with the changes of the character very well, and giving a strong leading man performance, which few actors could do as well.
1. Forest Whitaker in The Last King of Scotland- Forest Whitaker is absolutely brilliant in every single scene in his film. He shows a man who is both absolutely insane, but also incredibly charismatic. It is an incredible challenge, and Whitaker achieves completely despite every challenge he must accomplish.
Deserving Performances:
Leonardo DiCaprio in The Departed
Daniel Craig in Casino Royale

Saturday, 23 October 2010

Best Actor 2006: Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happyness

Will Smith received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Chris Gardner in The Pursuit of Happyness.

The Pursuit of Happyness I actually did not mind watching, actually since it was actually upbeat, unlike so many films of this era. I am not saying that many films need to be positive, but not all should be negative as they are these days. I am not saying that it really is all that good of a film, but I liked the change of pace from the other movies with the other nominated performances.

The real Chris Gardner who went from homelessness to millionaire apparently believed that Will Smith was actually a bit of miscasting. I am inclined to agree with the real man for a few reasons. Number one is the role does not really seem to be the right type of role for Smith. Smith an actor who does mostly use his natural charisma for his roles, which does work okay for lighter types of roles. There are a few times he does not really even use that, such as Ali which results in basically a complete failure. His natural charisma is rated differently by many, I think he does certainly have charisma, but it is not anything astonishing.

In this role he actually should have tried to avoid his Will Smithisms. He does not exactly do this for most of his performance and I think that is a bit of a problem in this performance. I feel he usually simply plays the character in more of a superficial way most of the film. I find he mostly just acts it as a Will Smith performance, and I find he does not really get into the heart of the character for most of the time. I think this is particularly in any scene where he is doing something involving the stock broker firm. For some reason I always saw every scene as a little bit false, as Will Smith working hard at his job opposed to Chris Gardener. I just never could see him as the real man, I always saw him as Will Smith. He never was able to override this, fact especially in these scenes stopping his performance from ringing true.

He has some slightly better scenes involving when he is not working toward his prospective job. Still though in scenes where he is yelling at people who cause him trouble, I still felt there was a certain falseness, and I simply never believed him in the role. I want to address that this is not because he is Will Smith, great actors with great personal charisma, can avoid this, but Smith does not do this effectively here.  The part just demands more realism which Smith does not bring to the role most of the time. He is not awful, just simply does not meet the needs of the role.

There are a few scenes where he is a bit better. These are almost all scenes with Chris's son played by Smith's real son. They actually do work well together and obviously do have a natural chemistry. Still I felt I was seeing Smith, and his son, but these worked better for the film overall. His two big scenes involving tear jerking on Smith's part which he does, well enough I guess, but never in any sort of amazing way. I would say he does a good reaction when he learns he has earned his job, his slight display of tears of happiness is well handled. But call be harsh, but for some reason it seemed just a adequate technical feat opposed to a truly emotional reaction. As I said he is not terrible, just simply he never seems to be right in the role.

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Best Actor 2006

And the Nominees Were:

Leonardo DiCaprio in Blood Diamond

Ryan Gosling in Half Nelson

Forest Whitaker in The Last King of Scotland

Peter O'Toole in Venus

Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happyness

So who do you pick, or predict? The mercenary, the teacher who has some problems, the Dictator with very severe problems, the old Actor, or the man who goes from rags to riches.

Friday, 9 April 2010

Best Actor 2001: Results

5. Sean Penn in I Am Sam- A performance that is forced in every single possible way. Penn overplays his mannerisms and his voice. His character is overly positive and really just comes off as one dimensional.
4. Will Smith in Ali- A very poor imitation but also just a bad performance on a whole which lacks any intelligence or depth.
3. Denzel Washington in Training Day- Washington gives a broad turn that is often entertaining and suited to making the most out of the film's lack of certainty regarding what type of film it is trying to be.
2. Russell Crowe in A Beautiful Mind- Crowe gives a very fine performance of a very troubled man. He plays man with severe mental problems yet he never overplays any scene, and instead remains realistic throughout the film despite the obtuse man he plays.
1. Tom Wilkinson in In the Bedroom- Wilkinson is perfect as the father who tries to hide the grief over his son. Every layer he builds into his performance is without fault. In his quite scenes he adds so much with only his eyes and face, and when he becomes a little louder he does not fault instead he excels.

Monday, 5 April 2010

Best Actor 2001: Will Smith in Ali

Will Smith received his first of two nominations for playing Muhammad Ali. Ali goes through Ali's life and Smith plays him the whole time through this rather shaky biopic.

This performance is not a good one at all. Smith here falls in the many pitfalls of a bad performance a real life person. Smith never ever seemed like Muhammad Ali to me, he always seemed like Will Smith failing to try to act like him. His voice is odd and improper rather than effective. The voice does not really sound like Ali one bit, which is just one part of the performance that does not work. The mannerisms are equally faulty, lacking any real effect and they just come off as distracting and false.

Smith is on screen for most of the film and for a performance like that the actor really needs to be on the ball but Smith is not up to the task. For most of the performance Smith just gives the same dispassionate look no matter what is happening, like the scene where Malcolm X breaks down in front of him. All he does is sit there almost not noticing him, what was that exactly. He does do other things he yells but he is never convincing in those scenes either, partially because of the awkward voice. Finally there are all the big show boating sequences at the press conference again he does not come off as natural, charming or funny. For these scenes to work well Smith needed more charisma in his performance which he lacks. Not a good performance but I do not really hate Smith as an actor. He is limited it seems.