Jeff Daniels did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain in Gettysburg.
Gettysburg divides its time between the Union and Confederate forces during the battle of Gettysburg. The southern forces focal character is sort of General James Longstreet played by Tom Berenger, one of the leading generals on that side. That character is more passive in a way, and his story is in way dealing with the various personalities of his fellow southern leaders. On the northern side though the focus is given to a lower ranked colonel, but one who ends up playing an essential role in the titular battle. This focus is one of the strongest elements of the film, and a great deal for that being the performance of Jeff Daniels as that Colonel. We get a very narrow perspective in his scenes as we are given a man who must deal with everything as they are, and what comes to him. Now what comes from these scenes goes beyond I feel than even just the events of his portion of the battle. Chamberlain story begins when his unit receives a group of soldiers, considered deserters by their refusal to fight, where he is given the choice to deal with the men as he wishes, which includes the possibility of having them shot. At this time we are also introduced to Laurence's brother Thomas (C. Thomas Howell) a lieutenant under his command, and his more battle worn Sergeant Buster Kilrain (Kevin Conway).
Daniels instantly establishes something that contributes so much to his work, which is his approach to portraying Chamberlain. He does not present him as this man of the military, which is fitting having been a college professor before the war, but even more so seems so much of a man than a period figure. He never seems to be that to merely represent something, as Daniels performance feels so lived in and authentic even with that overgrown mustache needed to match the historical portrait of the man. Daniels in the early scenes brings this lightness to his performance, that does not stem from a lack of understanding for the material, but rather an effective realization of the state of the person. Daniels shows a man technically living his life, though his life is an unorthodox circumstance. Now in this approach Daniels adds so much more to the role by this. Daniels brings these nice touches that he delivers in such a casual yet wholly authentic way, such as his humorous attempts to get his brother not to refer to him as Laurence. Daniels is great in this moment as he does no show the unease in him stemming from trying to be some tough guy soldier, but rather just so earnestly presents a guy attempting to fulfill his position properly.
In his first scenes we see him deal with the problem of the deserters, and I love how Daniels handles the scene. As he speaks with the man Daniels actually doesn't express the utmost command as he deals with the man, instead portraying a man of a different nature trying to gently get through the situation. In the scene where Laurence speaks with the deserters' spokesman, who names his amount of engagements as well asking Chamberlain his own amount, the humble way Daniels delivers the admission of "less" so effectively realizes the Laurence's modesty. In order to deal with the deserters though Laurence attempts to encourage the men to continue fighting essentially by telling them his own purpose in the war. This is an essential moment not only for Daniels's performance but for the overall film as it gives life to pivotal element in the civil war that is virtually left out due to the constrictions of the narrative. That element being slavery. Daniels in the scene so beautifully renders Laurence argument for the cause to end slavery. It is actually a very quiet and calm yet powerful speech that Daniels gives, so eloquently verbalizing not only his distress towards the institution but also his passion for ending it in order to free men. The majority of the deserters end up joining with Chamberlain, and it is Daniels's performance that makes that result absolutely convincing.
Again though so much of the strength of Daniels's work comes in the quieter moments, and something I love is the way he crafts the relationships with both Howell's and Conway's characters. With Howell, Daniels is terrific in that awkwardness he brings of the older brothers attempting to look out for his younger brother, while trying to be his commander at the same time. Daniels is great in realizing the difficulty in that and helps to suggest how their relationship was before the war, with Thomas perhaps expecting too much from his older brother with Laurence possibly giving his younger brother a bit too much leeway, yet behind it all there is a very assumed love of such a relationship.A different relationship though is with the hardened vet Kilrain. Daniels and Conway's chemistry is even stronger in a way than with Howell, as the two actors convey so honestly this mutual respect the two have one another. It is often stated yet so perfectly assumed in the way Daniels shows just the way he listens in their scenes together. Daniels shows the way that Chamberlain is really taking in what the man has to say and so values not only his experience but also their friendship. It is all so effortless though as you can see the two have spent some time serving together in their ease and warmth in their interactions.
The middle section of the film ends up being the pivotal part that Chamberlain plays in the battle, which is on the second day where he must defend a hill known as Little Round top. The hill is essential to preventing the South from flanking the Union army. This engagement is the strongest sequence in the film, and Daniels's work is one of the major reasons why. Daniels throughout the scenes always so effectively continues to show this man, this professor of etiquette, in this dire situation as he must lead against the onslaught of southern soldiers attempting to take the hill from the Union army. There is nothing taken lightly in this situation as Daniels brilliantly realizes the wear of the battle not only in terms of the physical degradation but also the mental degradation of the fight. Again though he's also a brother in the situation, and one of the most moving moments in the film for me is the anguish Daniels brings in Laurence, brief as it must be given the battle, as he has his brother plug a hole in the defense. Daniels is incredible as he completely shows a commander trying to keep his troops together, a soldier trying to keep himself alive, and an older brother's terrible concern for his sibling he cares dearly for. Daniels makes the distress feel so real, especially in his harrowing scream of "Tom!" when it appears his brother is about to be shot. So much of the intensity in the sequence comes from Daniels's devoted performance, that never allows a single moment to lay flat. He internalizes all of it into his performance. It doesn't end there as Laurence must make a daring decision to lead a charge in order to defeat the southern forces after he runs out of ammunition. Daniels is downright amazing in the scene as he makes it more than simply a man taking the charge when he most needs to. Daniels realizes that of course, but throughout the moment he also keeps alive a real fear of a man who's not entirely sure of his action but has no other choice. Daniels makes it a particularly rousing moment though because he earns it so much be finding Laurence's inexperience in the moment making the victory all the greater. Daniels only brings this home all the more in the relief and just the right amount of joy Daniels expresses in this success. The pain of the battle is completely embodied by Daniels work yet he makes the triumph all the greater, as this is just a normal man accomplishing something he perhaps wasn't even aware that he could do. Again the whole sequence is made something truly remarkable through Daniels's portrayal of a real man going through every second of the attack.
Now that sequence is when Daniels leads the film, but he continues to appear in the final day of the battle which focuses upon the South's last effort to advance. Daniels has a few key moments, that have a great impact through everything else in his performance that already helped to establish. Daniels in these scenes again wears the battle, not only in his direct leg injury, but also in the haunting way he presents the horrible experience of it all even now that he is given a "break". The loss of that attack technically is not finished though as evidenced when his brother reports on Killrain's condition, who was shot twice during the battle, which is to reveal that the man died. Although the death is off screen it is the most heartbreaking one in the film, Daniels devastating in his reaction, showing just how torn up Laurence is by the news, and conveys just how much Laurence cared for his friend. His simple delivery of "yeah" to acknowledge his friend is all that is needed, as Daniels infuses it with such honest emotion. In the end Laurence's final scenes in the film are simple yet fitting entirely to the character, and does not feel underwhelming due to all that Daniels brought beforehand. The final sendoff being but an embrace between the Chamberlain brothers after they have survived the events of the entire battle. It is poignant and all that is needed. This is an exceptional turn by Jeff Daniels. I love the performance as it is such nuanced and powerful depiction of one man within a great war.
Showing posts with label Jeff Daniels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeff Daniels. Show all posts
Tuesday, 3 January 2017
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2005: Results
5. Jeff Daniels in The Squid and the Whale- Daniels is terrific at being
one of the most self indulgent character's ever, he never strives from
the indulgence instead reveling in it creating a rather entertaining performance.
4. Val Kilmer in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang- Kilmer is just excellent in giving a deliciously amusing and cynical performance that compliments Robert Downey Jr's leading work marvelously.
3. Mickey Rourke in Sin City- Rourke unlike so many of his co-stars finds just the right tone for the material giving an effective turn that is easily the best part of the film.
2. Barry Pepper in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada- Pepper is great here giving a moving performance as a foolish man who is forced to change when confronted with his crime.
1. Ed Harris in A History of Violence- This was an extremely difficult year to choose as I loved all of these performances, and the top two of Pepper and Harris were very hard to choose just one. For the moment though I will go with Harris who despite having the least screen time out of all gives performances he has just as great impact with his powerful villainous turn in this film.
4. Val Kilmer in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang- Kilmer is just excellent in giving a deliciously amusing and cynical performance that compliments Robert Downey Jr's leading work marvelously.
2. Barry Pepper in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada- Pepper is great here giving a moving performance as a foolish man who is forced to change when confronted with his crime.
1. Ed Harris in A History of Violence- This was an extremely difficult year to choose as I loved all of these performances, and the top two of Pepper and Harris were very hard to choose just one. For the moment though I will go with Harris who despite having the least screen time out of all gives performances he has just as great impact with his powerful villainous turn in this film.
- Ed Harris in A History of Violence
- Edward Norton in Kingdom of Heaven
- Val Kilmer in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
- William Hurt in A History of Violence
- Keanu Reeves in Thumbsucker
- John Hurt in The Proposition
- Ghassan Massoud in Kingdom of Heaven
- Cillian Murphy in Red Eye
- Cillian Murphy in Batman Begins
- Danny Huston in The Proposition
- Donald Sumpter in The Constant Gardener
- Heath Ledger in Lords of Dogtown
- Min-sik Choi in Sympathy of Lady Vengeance
- David Thewlis in Kingdom of Heaven
- Jeffrey Wright in Broken Flowers
- Donald Sutherland in Pride and Prejudice
- Peter Sarsgaard in Jarhead
- Vincent D'Onofrio in Thumbsucker
- Chiwetel Ejiofor in Serenity
- Kevin Costner in The Upside of Anger
- Clifton Collins Jr. in Capote
- Matt Dillon in Crash
- Brendan Gleeson in The Goblet of Fire
- Gary Oldman in Batman Begins
- Stephen McHattie in A History of Violence
- Ciaran Hinds in Munich
- Jeremy Irons in Kingdom of Heaven
- Christopher Plummer in The New World
- Stephen Dillane in Nine Lives
- Boris Leskin in Everything is Illuminated
- Chris Bridges in Crash
- Tom Hollander in Pride and Prejudice
- Liam Neeson in Kingdom of Heaven
- Paul Giamatti in Cinderella Man
- Danny Huston in The Constant Gardener
- Rockmond Dunbar in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
- Joe Mantegna in Nine Lives
- Alexander Siddig in Kingdom of Heaven
- Vince Vaughn in Thumbsucker
- Mathieu Kassovitz in Munich
- Kenneth Nkosi in Tsotsi
- Jack Black in King Kong
- Michael Caine in Batman Begins
- Jamie Foxx in Jarhead
- Christian Bale in The New World
- Hugh Dillon in Down to the Bone
- Jared Leto in Lord of War
- Liam Neeson in Batman Begins
- Powers Boothe in Sin City
- Linus Roache in Batman Begins
- Richard Jenkins in North Country
- Hanns Zilcher in Munich
- Ian McShane in Nine Lives
- Ralph Fiennes in Wallace and Gromit Curse of the Were Rabbit
- Paddy Considine in Cinderella Man
- Michael Anganaro in Lords of Dogtown
- Mothusi Magano in Tsotsi
- Michael Pena in Crash
- Wes Studi in The New World
- Tom Wilkinson in Batman Begins
- Beau Bridges in The Ballad of Jack and Rose
- Clive Owen in Sin City
- Daniel Craig in Munich
- Julio Cedilla in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
- David Wenham in The Proposition
- Zenzo Ngqobe in Tsotsi
- Ethan Hawke in Lord of War
- Don Cheadle in Crash
- Mathieu Amalric in Munich
- Alan Rickman in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Ryan McDonald in The Ballad of Jack and Rose
- Benecio Del Toro in Sin City
- Skandar Keynes in The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe
- Woody Harrelson in North Country
- Nick Stahl in Sin City
- Billy Nighy in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Frank Langella in Good Night and Good Luck
- Chris Cooper in Capote
- Graham Greene in Transamerica
- Rutger Hauer in Sin City
- Omar Metwally in Munich
- Elijah Wood in Sin City
- George Clooney in Good Night and Good Luck
- Dwight Yoakam in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
- Brian Geraghty in Jarhead
- Terrence Howard in Crash
- Kurt Russell in Sky High
- Sam Rockwell in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Ralph Fiennes in The Goblet of Fire
- Tom Hollander in The Libertine
- Chris Cooper in Jarhead
- Jason Isaacs in Nine Lives
- Dave Foley in Sky High
- Ian Holm in Lord of War
- Bruce Campbell in Sky High
- Christopher Lawford in The World's Fastest Indian
- Corbin Bernsen in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
- Kevin Mcdonald in Sky High
- Craig Bierko in Cinderella Man
- Robert Downey Jr. in Good Night and Good Luck
- Alan Tudyk in Serenity
- John Malkovich in The Libertine
- Morgan Freeman in Batman Begins
- Jon Finch in Kingdom of Heaven
- Geoffrey Rush in Munich
- Michael Sheen in Kingdom of Heaven
- Christopher Lee in Corpse Bride
- Mos Def in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Brendan Gleeson in Kingdom of Heaven
- Jason Lee in The Ballad of Jack and Rose
- Jeremy Renner in North Country
- John Malkovich in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Walton Goggins in The World's Fastest Indian
- Christopher Walken in Wedding Crashers
- Brian Cox in Red Eye
- Albert Finney in Corpse Bride
- Brian Cox in Matchpoint
- Burt Young in Transamerica
- James Cromwell in The Longest Yard
- Sean Bean in North Country
- Bruce Willis in Sin City
- Matthew Goode in Matchpoint
- Michael Chiklis in Fantastic Four
- Michael Clarke Duncan in Sin City
- Peter Stormare in The Brothers Grimm
- Chris Evans in Fantastic Four
- William Baldwin in The Squid and the Whale
- Tim Robbins in The War of the Worlds
- Ryan Phillippe in Crash
- Owen Kline in The Squid and the Whale
- George Clooney in Syriana
- Jonathan Pryce in The Brothers Grimm
- Ashton Holmes in A History of Violence
- Michael Gambon in The Goblet of Fire
- Marton Csokas in Kingdom of Heaven
- Paul Dano in The Ballad of Jack and Rose
- Robert Dawson in The Sun
- Brendan Frasier in Crash
- Bradley Cooper in Wedding Crashers
- Ian Mcdiarmid in Revenge of the Sith
- Julian McMahon in Fantastic Four
- Kevin James in Hitch
- Kevin Zegers in Transamerica
- Kyle Schmid in A History of Violence
- Chris Rock in The Longest Yard
- Keir O'Donnell in Wedding Crashers
- David Tennant in The Goblet of Fire
- Michael Madsen in Sin City
Monday, 17 December 2012
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2005: Jeff Daniels in The Squid and the Whale
Jeff Daniels did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe for portraying Bernard Berkman.
The Squid and the Whale is an intriguing and entertaining film about the conflict that develops when a literary family is broken apart by divorce.
Daniels anyway is brilliant in this performance in just the way he creates this character. This is a performance that can be taken as almost one note in the broad strokes, though that is not true due to the subtleties of Daniels's work. What Daniels does here is take self absorption to an all new level with his performance here as a once great writer who still considered himself so, even though no one else seems to. Daniels always is reassuring the fact that Bernard is as much into himself as a man possibly can. Daniels doesn't show a hint of doubt as he says such things as the Tale of Two Cities being "lesser Dickens" or than Kafka was one of his predecessors.
Daniels makes it clear throughout the film that he has no concerns in any way if people even doubt his genius because he is so self assured. Daniels is terrific here because there is not ever a doubt in our minds that he has no doubt about himself. Daniels is actually quite hilarious in how pure the self absorption is in his performance. Daniels portrays Bernard as a man very much in love with himself without the need for anyone else's approval because they are not geniuses like him anyways. It is almost a derangement considering how sure of himself he really is, but Daniels of course shows it only ever to be a calm very very collected derangement that Bernard has.
It is a brilliant note that Daniels plays the part at and really it would be wrong for Daniels to ever get off that note as Bernard never does lose his intense devotion to himself, even at the end of the film Daniels still stays firm in support of Bernard's derangement. Daniels shows that Bernard simply is incapable of losing his superiority complex. Daniels is pure as whether it is trying to teach his kids a lesson, or fighting with his wife Bernard never stops with his own approach of quiet reserved smugness. The only time he really breaks this frame is when he is shown not to be the best, and Daniels is quite good that only when pushed into a corner that exposes an inferiority does he break out in anger.
Daniels is brilliant in his broader creation of course, but his best moments perhaps are in the silent expressions of his performance. He is particularly excellent in any scene where someone praises Bernard's wife's writing in his presence. Daniels always portrays a deep wound in his face in Bernard anytime that he hears that his wife may be a better writer than he. Daniels is equally strong in his moments of interacting with his kids particularly when he expresses love to them. Daniels is particularly interesting in these seems as when Bernard tries to talk warmly to them he does and he doesn't. Daniels finds just the right difficult tone needed as Bernard does love his kids, but never enough to love them more than he loves himself.
This is a terrific performance by Jeff Daniels where he succeeds in making an extremely unlikable character extremely enjoyable to watch. The challenge of this character really is a big one in that Bernard could easily just be obnoxious with his constant self promotion, or dull with his relaxed manner of doing so. Jeff Daniels though more than meets the challenge presented by the character with such an effortless assurance with his performance. He simply has a grasp on the part, which is essential for this character to work as he really cannot have even the slightest doubts to be believed. Daniels makes the character his own being the entertaining despicable "genius" Bernard Berkman should be.
The Squid and the Whale is an intriguing and entertaining film about the conflict that develops when a literary family is broken apart by divorce.
Daniels anyway is brilliant in this performance in just the way he creates this character. This is a performance that can be taken as almost one note in the broad strokes, though that is not true due to the subtleties of Daniels's work. What Daniels does here is take self absorption to an all new level with his performance here as a once great writer who still considered himself so, even though no one else seems to. Daniels always is reassuring the fact that Bernard is as much into himself as a man possibly can. Daniels doesn't show a hint of doubt as he says such things as the Tale of Two Cities being "lesser Dickens" or than Kafka was one of his predecessors.
Daniels makes it clear throughout the film that he has no concerns in any way if people even doubt his genius because he is so self assured. Daniels is terrific here because there is not ever a doubt in our minds that he has no doubt about himself. Daniels is actually quite hilarious in how pure the self absorption is in his performance. Daniels portrays Bernard as a man very much in love with himself without the need for anyone else's approval because they are not geniuses like him anyways. It is almost a derangement considering how sure of himself he really is, but Daniels of course shows it only ever to be a calm very very collected derangement that Bernard has.
It is a brilliant note that Daniels plays the part at and really it would be wrong for Daniels to ever get off that note as Bernard never does lose his intense devotion to himself, even at the end of the film Daniels still stays firm in support of Bernard's derangement. Daniels shows that Bernard simply is incapable of losing his superiority complex. Daniels is pure as whether it is trying to teach his kids a lesson, or fighting with his wife Bernard never stops with his own approach of quiet reserved smugness. The only time he really breaks this frame is when he is shown not to be the best, and Daniels is quite good that only when pushed into a corner that exposes an inferiority does he break out in anger.
Daniels is brilliant in his broader creation of course, but his best moments perhaps are in the silent expressions of his performance. He is particularly excellent in any scene where someone praises Bernard's wife's writing in his presence. Daniels always portrays a deep wound in his face in Bernard anytime that he hears that his wife may be a better writer than he. Daniels is equally strong in his moments of interacting with his kids particularly when he expresses love to them. Daniels is particularly interesting in these seems as when Bernard tries to talk warmly to them he does and he doesn't. Daniels finds just the right difficult tone needed as Bernard does love his kids, but never enough to love them more than he loves himself.
This is a terrific performance by Jeff Daniels where he succeeds in making an extremely unlikable character extremely enjoyable to watch. The challenge of this character really is a big one in that Bernard could easily just be obnoxious with his constant self promotion, or dull with his relaxed manner of doing so. Jeff Daniels though more than meets the challenge presented by the character with such an effortless assurance with his performance. He simply has a grasp on the part, which is essential for this character to work as he really cannot have even the slightest doubts to be believed. Daniels makes the character his own being the entertaining despicable "genius" Bernard Berkman should be.
Friday, 14 December 2012
Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2005
And the Nominees Were Not:
Barry Pepper in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
Jeff Daniels in The Squid and the Whale
Ed Harris in A History of Violence
Mickey Rourke in Sin City
Val Kilmer in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Barry Pepper in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
Jeff Daniels in The Squid and the Whale
Ed Harris in A History of Violence
Mickey Rourke in Sin City
Val Kilmer in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Friday, 29 June 2012
Alternate Best Actor 1985: Results
5. Jeff Daniels in The Purple Rose of Cairo- Daniels gives a very strong
performance as both as the actor and his character. He does a
particularly wonderful job portraying the subtle differences between the
two.
Best Scene: Gil Shepard and Tom Baxter meet each other.
4. Jonathan Pryce in Brazil- Pryce has a difficult role being a film very much controlled without question by the director. Nevertheless Pryce stands as the solid straight man of the film, giving a likable as well as moving portrayal of a normal man in an overly complex world.
Best Scene: "Brazil"
3. Tim Curry in Clue- Tim Curry gives a very enjoyable performance where he infuses a great deal of energy in every scene as well as he works wonders with the rest of his cast.
Best Scene: Wadsworth recreates the night's events.
2. Michael J. Fox in Back to the Future- Fox tempted me greatly into giving him the win with his absolutely terrific performance in this film. He carries the film brilliantly with his perfect performance that adds both weight and humor to the film.
Best Scene: "Earth Angel"
1. Raul Julia in Kiss of the Spider Woman- This is an especially shameful year for the academy who nominated several mediocre performance when they could have nominated this terrific line up instead. This was also particularly hard to decide on my ranking on the bottom three, the top two, and even the overall number one. Julia though I give both the win here, as well as the overall along with his co-star Hurt, because what makes both of their performances as tremendous as they both are because of the truly fascinating relationship they create with each other. Both are completely amazing in their roles, but I still should say Fox is right behind them with his equally great even though very different performance.
Best Scene: Kiss of the Spider woman.
Overall Rank:
Best Scene: Gil Shepard and Tom Baxter meet each other.
4. Jonathan Pryce in Brazil- Pryce has a difficult role being a film very much controlled without question by the director. Nevertheless Pryce stands as the solid straight man of the film, giving a likable as well as moving portrayal of a normal man in an overly complex world.
Best Scene: "Brazil"
3. Tim Curry in Clue- Tim Curry gives a very enjoyable performance where he infuses a great deal of energy in every scene as well as he works wonders with the rest of his cast.
Best Scene: Wadsworth recreates the night's events.
2. Michael J. Fox in Back to the Future- Fox tempted me greatly into giving him the win with his absolutely terrific performance in this film. He carries the film brilliantly with his perfect performance that adds both weight and humor to the film.
Best Scene: "Earth Angel"
1. Raul Julia in Kiss of the Spider Woman- This is an especially shameful year for the academy who nominated several mediocre performance when they could have nominated this terrific line up instead. This was also particularly hard to decide on my ranking on the bottom three, the top two, and even the overall number one. Julia though I give both the win here, as well as the overall along with his co-star Hurt, because what makes both of their performances as tremendous as they both are because of the truly fascinating relationship they create with each other. Both are completely amazing in their roles, but I still should say Fox is right behind them with his equally great even though very different performance.
Best Scene: Kiss of the Spider woman.
Overall Rank:
- William Hurt and Raul Julia in Kiss of the Spider Woman (Tie)
- Tatsuya Nakadai in Ran
- Michael J. Fox in Back to the Future
- Eric Stoltz in Mask
- Griffin Dunne in After Hours
- Aleksei Kravchenko in Come and See
- Tim Curry in Clue
- James Mason in The Shooting Party
- Jonathan Pryce in Brazil
- Ken Ogata in Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters
- Jeff Daniels in The Purple Rose of Cairo
- Clint Eastwood in Pale Rider
- Klaus Maria Brandauer in Colonel Redl
- Albert Brooks in Lost in America
- Harrison Ford in Witness
- Jeffrey Combs in Re-Animator
- Mel Gibson in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome
- Tsutomu Yamazaki in Tampopo
- Judd Nelson in The Breakfast Club
- Paul Reubens in Pee Wee's Big Adventure
- Rutger Hauer in Ladyhawke
- John Cusack in Better Off Dead
- Nicholas Rowe in Young Sherlock Holmes
- Gordon Warnecke in My Beautiful Laundrette
- Gene Hackman in Twice in a Lifetime
- Jeff Bridges in Jagged Edge
- Anthony Michael Hall in The Breakfast Club
- Timothy Hutton in The Falcon and the Snowman
- Ethan Hawke in Explorers
- Bobby Fite in Explorers
- David Huddleston in Santa Clause
- Sean Astin in The Goonies
- William Ragsdale in Fright Night
- Alan Cox in Young Sherlock Holmes
- Mickey Rourke in Year of the Dragon
- William Peterson in To Live and Die in LA
- John Getz in Blood Simple
- Sylvester Stallone in Rambo First Blood Part II
- Emilio Estevez in The Breakfast Club
- Michael J. Fox in Teen Wolf
- Val Kilmer in Real Genius
- Dudley Moore in Santa Clause
- River Phoenix in Explorers
- Sylvester Stallone in Rocky IV
- James Garner in Murphy's Romance
- Jon Voight in Runaway Train
- Sean Penn in The Falcon and The Snowman
- Tom Cruise in Legend
- Matthew Broderick in Ladyhawke
- Gabriel Jarrett in Real Genius
- Robert Redford in Out of Africa
- Chevy Chase in National Lampoon's European Vacation
- Roger Moore in A View To Kill
- Jack Nicholson in Prizzi's Honor
- Grant Bardsley in The Black Cauldron
- Bruce Abbott in Re-Animator
- Mark Patton in Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Alternate Best Actor 1985: Jeff Daniels in The Purple Rose of Cairo
Jeff Daniels did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Baxter and Gil Shepherd in The Purple Rose of Cairo.
The Purple Rose of Cairo is an enjoyable film but also horrifying in its depiction of film characters who are sentient but still forced to reenact the same scenario over and over again. Anyway it is about a woman Cecilia (Mia Farrow) who tries to escape the troubles of the great depression by escaping in films, but finds one of the characters notices her and walks right out of the screen.
Jeff Daniels portrays both the character who comes out of the screen Tom Baxter, and Gil Shepherd the man who portrayed the character of Tom Baxter for the film. Tom Baxter really is not based on any particular character as the Purple Rose of Cairo is not poised as any sort of masterpiece. Instead it is shown to be clearly an especially lightweight piece of work, which is reflected well in the character of Tom Baxter. Something that is interesting actually about Daniels's dual role is that he does not portray them especially differently like say Peter Sellers plays his three parts in Dr. Strangelove. This is not a criticism though, because although his portrayals are not massively different they are not the same either.
As Tom Baxter Daniels portrays a very simple character who is suppose to be simple by the nature of that he is suppose to be a fairly simple character in the film within a film. Daniels is quite believable as this character within this film, which is just a character who is suppose to be a wide eyed optimist. Daniels plays up this fact in his portrayal as that is exactly what Baxter does. He looks at things in a wide eyed almost always happy fashion, and with a constant interest with his new surroundings once he finally decides to go and leave film. Daniels manages to bring the charm what is fitting in the role by just playing up how simple and nice the character of Tom Baxter is suppose to be.
Daniels actually has a very particular posture and style of movement for when he is Tom Baxter that emphasizes the fact that he is a film character, and not a really person. He always is very much proper in his posture, and his movement are always tight and distinct very much like the way the actors would move at the time. One thing he never does is ever really convey his emotions with his body more of just fairly simple facial expressions. He is always proper as the character's in those films were so often portrayed as there is not a hint of method acting in Tom Baxter. This actually a brilliantly handled aspect by Daniels, as he never brings to much attention to it, but still manages to show how Baxter is otherworldly.
Now of course Daniels also portrays Gil Shepherd the actor, and as I said he does not portray them all that differently. The truth is though he really should not portray him in an exceedingly different fashion though since Gil Shepherd is not suppose to be any sort of Laurence Olivier, in fact in many ways is suppose to be a fairly stock actor therefore he is not an actor with a great degree of range who becomes inseparable from a role. He is not even suppose to be a star actually, and Daniels therefore only really has small subtle differences between his two performances. One of these being his posture is more lacking, as well as he does express his emotions with his body quite often something that Tom never really does.
It is quite amazing actually the way Daniels so carefully pulls off the difference between the performance and the performer but he does it marvelously. Their other main difference comes in their attitudes and Daniels shows their differing personalities well. Gil is not a simple optimist in anyway instead he is a very self involved actor. Daniels is quite good here as well because he does not overplay this and make Gil some sort of self indulgent pompous jerk. Instead he portrays him fairly realistically downplaying the whole ego aspect, but still making it clear that Gil is always contemplating in his head his thoughts about his career first.
This is particularly well handled in his scenes with Mia Farrow. Daniels still has a certain charm as Gil, but there is always a particular drive in his performance that always seems to move toward something about himself. Daniels shows that even when Gil is talking to her pleasantly enough he only really comes to life whenever there is something mentioned about how great he was in something. On the other hand Daniels portrays that Tom is always light up in every moment he shares with Cecilia no matter what the situation. He never loses that simple outlook and his romantic love he shows for her is always absolutely genuine even if rather simple.
Jeff Daniels performance here is quite an achievement actually because of how carefully he does portray the two different men. He creates an interesting portrait of both a fantastical creation limited by the constraints of the black and white world he comes from which contrasts well with his realistic portrait of an actor who is very concerned with his own image and career. Both of his characters are both interesting in their own right, and Daniels manages to never overplay either character even though both could have been heavily. This is a strong performance that manages to bring life to this quite peculiar story.
The Purple Rose of Cairo is an enjoyable film but also horrifying in its depiction of film characters who are sentient but still forced to reenact the same scenario over and over again. Anyway it is about a woman Cecilia (Mia Farrow) who tries to escape the troubles of the great depression by escaping in films, but finds one of the characters notices her and walks right out of the screen.
Jeff Daniels portrays both the character who comes out of the screen Tom Baxter, and Gil Shepherd the man who portrayed the character of Tom Baxter for the film. Tom Baxter really is not based on any particular character as the Purple Rose of Cairo is not poised as any sort of masterpiece. Instead it is shown to be clearly an especially lightweight piece of work, which is reflected well in the character of Tom Baxter. Something that is interesting actually about Daniels's dual role is that he does not portray them especially differently like say Peter Sellers plays his three parts in Dr. Strangelove. This is not a criticism though, because although his portrayals are not massively different they are not the same either.
As Tom Baxter Daniels portrays a very simple character who is suppose to be simple by the nature of that he is suppose to be a fairly simple character in the film within a film. Daniels is quite believable as this character within this film, which is just a character who is suppose to be a wide eyed optimist. Daniels plays up this fact in his portrayal as that is exactly what Baxter does. He looks at things in a wide eyed almost always happy fashion, and with a constant interest with his new surroundings once he finally decides to go and leave film. Daniels manages to bring the charm what is fitting in the role by just playing up how simple and nice the character of Tom Baxter is suppose to be.
Daniels actually has a very particular posture and style of movement for when he is Tom Baxter that emphasizes the fact that he is a film character, and not a really person. He always is very much proper in his posture, and his movement are always tight and distinct very much like the way the actors would move at the time. One thing he never does is ever really convey his emotions with his body more of just fairly simple facial expressions. He is always proper as the character's in those films were so often portrayed as there is not a hint of method acting in Tom Baxter. This actually a brilliantly handled aspect by Daniels, as he never brings to much attention to it, but still manages to show how Baxter is otherworldly.
Now of course Daniels also portrays Gil Shepherd the actor, and as I said he does not portray them all that differently. The truth is though he really should not portray him in an exceedingly different fashion though since Gil Shepherd is not suppose to be any sort of Laurence Olivier, in fact in many ways is suppose to be a fairly stock actor therefore he is not an actor with a great degree of range who becomes inseparable from a role. He is not even suppose to be a star actually, and Daniels therefore only really has small subtle differences between his two performances. One of these being his posture is more lacking, as well as he does express his emotions with his body quite often something that Tom never really does.
It is quite amazing actually the way Daniels so carefully pulls off the difference between the performance and the performer but he does it marvelously. Their other main difference comes in their attitudes and Daniels shows their differing personalities well. Gil is not a simple optimist in anyway instead he is a very self involved actor. Daniels is quite good here as well because he does not overplay this and make Gil some sort of self indulgent pompous jerk. Instead he portrays him fairly realistically downplaying the whole ego aspect, but still making it clear that Gil is always contemplating in his head his thoughts about his career first.
This is particularly well handled in his scenes with Mia Farrow. Daniels still has a certain charm as Gil, but there is always a particular drive in his performance that always seems to move toward something about himself. Daniels shows that even when Gil is talking to her pleasantly enough he only really comes to life whenever there is something mentioned about how great he was in something. On the other hand Daniels portrays that Tom is always light up in every moment he shares with Cecilia no matter what the situation. He never loses that simple outlook and his romantic love he shows for her is always absolutely genuine even if rather simple.
Jeff Daniels performance here is quite an achievement actually because of how carefully he does portray the two different men. He creates an interesting portrait of both a fantastical creation limited by the constraints of the black and white world he comes from which contrasts well with his realistic portrait of an actor who is very concerned with his own image and career. Both of his characters are both interesting in their own right, and Daniels manages to never overplay either character even though both could have been heavily. This is a strong performance that manages to bring life to this quite peculiar story.
Sunday, 24 June 2012
Alternate Best Actor 1985
And the Nominees Were Not:
Michael J. Fox in Back to the Future
Jonathan Pryce in Brazil
Raul Julia in Kiss of the Spider Woman
Tim Curry in Clue
Jeff Daniels in The Purple Rose of Cairo
A year without a single actor yet to be nominated for an Oscar, good luck on your predictions.
Michael J. Fox in Back to the Future
Jonathan Pryce in Brazil
Raul Julia in Kiss of the Spider Woman
Tim Curry in Clue
Jeff Daniels in The Purple Rose of Cairo
A year without a single actor yet to be nominated for an Oscar, good luck on your predictions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











