Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 February 2025

Best Actor 2024: Results

 5. Timothée Chalamet in A Complete Unknown - Chalamet gives a pretty hard to believe impression that leaves Dylan as a mystery that it doesn't even seem he knows the truths of. His musical performances are fine, albeit unspectacular, at least.

Best Scene: One of the songs I guess.
4. Ralph Fiennes in Conclave - Fiennes elevates every moment of his potboiler and brings an emotional honesty to an often very silly film that takes itself very seriously. 

Best Scene: Confronting Aldo about Tremblay
3. Sebastian Stan in The Apprentice - A very close #3/#2  because I think both are great in very different ways. Stan delivering on tremendous challenge of playing Trump without falling into caricature. Instead artfully builds towards the Trump we know, while also successfully showing the steps into corruption. 

Best Scene: After his brother's death. 
2. Colman Domingo in Sing Sing - Domingo gives such soulful and genuine work in portraying such endearing and infectious energy for the healing power of acting. Finding that though with a moving portrayal of the weight of living behind bars for a crime you know you didn't commit. 

Best Scene: Parole hearing.
1. Adrien Brody in The Brutalist - Good predictions Anonymous, Calvin, Lucas, Michael McCarthy, Emi Grant, Maciej, Harris & Perfectionist. But as much as I loved Stan and Domingo, there was no competition for me here in Brody just giving one of those performances where you just feel you meet this person, every bit of his complicated traumatic history, and through every bit of his life including his ambition, his moments of joy, and his many moments of intense hardship.  

Best Scene: Car breakdown. 
Next: 2024 alternate supporting.  

Saturday, 1 February 2025

Best Actor 2024: Colman Domingo in Sing Sing

Colman Domingo received his second Oscar nomination for portraying John "Divine G" Whitfield in Sing Sing.

Sing Sing follows a theater program in a prison. 

Colman Domingo earns his consecutive Oscar nomination, after receiving one for a truly run-of-the-mill biopic thankfully was able to follow up on that momentum for something far more interesting here. Domingo plays a real person in Divine G one of the men who were part of the real program, where he is surrounded largely by the real life former prisoners of the program, but also Domingo’s real life friend Sean San José as fellow prisoner Mike Mike and Paul Raci as the director of the program Brent Buell. So Domingo in a way has a bit of dual challenge going in one part is to successfully bring basically the reason for his casting via professional cred/talent to the film, but also not actually stick out too much in terms of seeming at all inauthentic within the so much of the rest of the cast that are telling their own true stories meanwhile Domingo is representing the real Diving G, who featured very briefly in the film. So opening the film we basically do get that as we begin with a production of A Midsummer’s Night Dream with Domingo delivering his monologue straight to camera most successfully, most professionally though I think most essentially with a certain zest for the performance beneath the lines as you see the outlet from Domingo in Divine G in this scene. Something we contrast most remarkably by the following scenes where where we watch Divine G going about day in the life of Sing Sing prison, walking around the tall stone walls, sitting in his small cell, listening to the intensity between a guard with a prisoner and even having to drop when an alarm is called in the yard. As much as this is all silent work, it is all great work from Domingo because he manages to grant you the years of doing this, as we see every moment of it as just routine, though importantly routine but not pleasant. It’s not a surprise to drop in the yard, but rather an unpleasant reminder of his life. 

So we are contrasted that greatly by Divine G as he works in the committee for the theater group that determines what they’re going to do next and who gets to join the committee. Domingo brings a far greater ease to this and you see much more than just a man in a theater group suddenly and no longer a prisoner. But Domingo doesn’t make it so simple as I really love in the moments where people bring up Divine G’s own writing, Domingo brings a potent humbleness about the man who does like to share his creative spirit but it is against his nature to boast about it. Domingo brings a bit of a retiring quality to it as he conveys a man who is passionate about his work but doesn’t exactly have absolute certainty with his talent either. There’s a particularly strong honesty about his work as such as even his admittance that he can’t write a comedy and notes that “I write satires” as Divine G admitting to what he can and cannot do without any ego to it. We see the guy come up with choosing a new member and decide on potentially recruiting a prison drug dealer Divine Eye (Clarence Maclin). Domingo’s great in the recruitment scene by just what is doing around the asking as there’s a keen eye that Domingo has in each moment of watching Divine Eye, including when Divine Eye goes about hectoring another prisoner in a very much acted performance. Domingo’s own performance of calling Divine Eye out at being an actor is with a knowing near smile of game recognizing game essentially. Domingo brings such a potent sense of the man’s eagerness to find this talent while also doing it in a way that we see the man working with their atypical recruitment situation, therefore has a bit more of an earthy than always artistic approach in his insightfulness. 

One of the great things Domingo brings here is really just the charged energy of his performance that enlivens so many scenes by just how much of it he has to share. We get some of this in his scenes with Mike Mike as his and Sean San José’s probable real life chemistry translates so well to the screen. Particularly a moment where they are practicing Divine G’s parole hearing and they go from a genuine grilling where Domingo brings such a potent sense of the character’s hidden frustrations that so naturally segue to just having fun in the moment with his buddy when Mike Mike’s questions go to an unrealistic and silly. The two are great together in that moment and you get such endearing warmth between them that is absolutely lovely to say the least. Of course Domingo can be great fun on his own as well such as when we see him along with a few other actors selling their theater program to some officials by acting out a gladiator scene. Domingo frankly brings more entertainment here than we got in Gladiator II, in just his over the top yet absolutely infectious way of truly playing out the sword fight. As we see in Domingo even when Divine G isn’t playing the most serious of roles, he still will put every ounce of himself into the performance into the moment, and just be so filled with the George C. Scott’s joy of performance, which is multiple layers here as we get the gladiator’s joy of battle, Divine G’s joy of performance, and Domingo’s own joy of performance all in this scene. Acting isn’t all serious, even if it times it is, in Domingo’s portrayal bringing out so much life to the entire experience of an actor.

Something the film does particularly well is combine the process of acting with the process of healing, something we find by focusing on Divine Eye and Divine G’s relationship throughout the film. As Divine Eye comes interested but also very cynical towards the notions of what the theater group can actually offer him. Initially on the serious side Domingo is so good in bringing forth such weaponized passion about the potential, but with this so potent sense of empathy as he tells Divine Eye what can be got from it. I especially adore the moment where he shuts down Divine Eye use of the N word, with just this bluntness of an intolerance of toxicity not in self-righteousness but rather someone with genuine improvement in mind. Part of what we see in their relationship advance as Divine Eye begins to act, even taking the part of Hamlet in their weird comedic hodge podge play they’re doing in this cycle. Something that Domingo plays so well as you do see the edges of disappointment in his reaction, in that he doesn’t love losing out on his desired part, but it also leads him to challenge Divine Eye, who notably had strongly suggested that they do a comedy rather than a serious drama. Domingo’s delivery of confronting Divine Eye over the hypocrisy so effectively because while again that hint of disappointment is there in his own love of the part, there is more so this penetrating desire for empathy and exploration in the man. He asks directly but with care as we see Divine G genuinely trying to get Divine Eye to accept his artistic aspirations and not let himself be held back by all the tough guy grandstanding. 

The process scenes of the film are among the best in which we see Divine Eye working the part and through working the part we get Divine G making his suggestions to help the first Divine Eye hone his craft. Domingo’s terrific in just every moment of this as he brings such a sense of the knowledge of the man but also his own talent as he comes in with such distinct charisma and wisdom in these moments. I love it though, especially the way you see that Domingo is aiming his suggestions with Divine Eye in mind. The moment where he pushes Divine Eye to walk not as a prisoner keeping his head down but as a prince of Denmark, Domingo’s way of speaking every word of this has this incisiveness to it, but also this active encouragement. There’s a great evolution to this as they continue on where he helps to get Divine Eye’s Hamlet to be a little less just anger placed and to make his emotion more complicated, more internalized. Even the way Domingo is watching before making the suggestions brings such a needed sense of the man’s mind just going with the idea of acting just being something that is part of his every breath in a certain sense. Bringing the professionalism of a great theater director himself as he pushes Divine Eye with his directness but with always that sense of warmth behind it. Domingo shows how Divine G wants Divine Eye to do his absolute best, and will cut it straight fitting for the man yet still with an unquestioned concern behind it all. Something that extends beyond just their theater practice as Divine Eye begins to pick his mind for more wisdom than just in acting, but also finding a way to get outside of the prison at some point. 

Domingo and Maclin also have fantastic chemistry in the way they connect with dealing with the years of prison. When Maclin questioning Divine G’s own losses outside the prison, Domingo finds the right sense of the way Divine G too is definitely holding things and holding things back in his notably short way of not quite dismissing the lives of his family by presenting the way that Divine G has purposefully compartmentalized that aspect of his life so it doesn’t hurt him too much in his incarceration. And something I noticed on re-watch that is very important for a later aspect of the film is that we see in terms of Diving G’s own plight, Domingo performs hesitation to talk about too much unless it is specifically about his opportunities to get out of prison. Domingo doesn’t make so much full repression but rather someone who very much finds a reason for being in what he can do for others. Because what we get when Divine G encourages Divine Eye to properly prepare for his parole hearing, Domingo’s performance carries with it such weight of wisdom with always the accentuation on the potential of the man rather than the negative. Whenever Divine Eye comes up with a self-defeating word, Domingo brings such natural strength to every word in Divine G’s impression repertoire, as each of them is filled with inspiration but a believable inspiration that a man like Divine Eye could believe in. Domingo in these moments accentuating Divine G as someone who can believe in others in many ways more than himself. 

This leads into the last act of the film which I still have mixed feelings about because it does a dogpile on Divine G which I don’t hate what is included, I’m just not sure it was all needed or maybe because of the way it does one then the other. But anyways, the first tragedy comes in with the death of Mike Mike from a brain aneurysm, and I will give Domingo all the credit in the world for just his outstanding work in the scene that leads up this between the two performers. There is such earnest connection as each speaks quietly about their lives outside, with such nuanced history in every word combined with the sense of loss mixed so succinctly as one. It’s a beautiful scene, made as such by the performers. And Domingo is also great in showing how shaken Divine G by the loss as we see a man more internalized, quieter and more in his own thoughts. Something that is amplified by also a parole hearing where some evidence that proves his innocence and should guarantee his freedom is missing. All of this I will say in terms of the whole seems like it should’ve either been explored more or left off, just because we get so little of it and it seems like there was a lot in terms of Divine G’s wrongful criminal conviction. HAVING SAID THAT, Domingo is fantastic in the scene, from the way he talks about the crime as a man lost, truly innocent of the facts and just separated from that. When asked about his acting, Domingo brings such sweetness in his little smile that shows just how much he’s gotten out of it and believes in the program. The way he articulates every word with such sincere belief, remarking his own acting with such modesty, while just propping up the collective good works as such a sharp point of happiness for him. Which the board undercuts by asking him if he’s acting to lie in this hearing. A line I don’t love because it feels a little on the nose to beat down Divine G further but HAVING SAID THAT again, Domingo’s reaction to it is just so heartbreaking in the way his flustered way of speaking shows how Divine G never would have believed someone could misinterpret something he finds so pure, and just his quiet horror at their failure to see is devastating. Which follows with a scene of the dress rehearsal where Diving G has a breakdown based on all that he’s gone through, which HAVING SAID THAT, Domingo’s portrayal of the build up is great as you just see for the first time no joy in his performance on any level that just becomes more repressed, more restrained and his final outburst is of a man who really maybe has deferred to much of his pain to help others and offers such ferocity as he lashes out. Domingo delivers such intensity potently and brings forth the weight of all his pain in the moment. Which eventually later Divine Eye calls him out on in such a poignant scene where the student becomes a teacher, and I love Domingo letting Maclin mostly have the moment, and leaving his moments to his reaction where you see the spark grow just as he sees Divine Eye now being the preacher of the message himself. Domingo going from that internalized coldness to just appreciating another again, is all that the scene needs to show Divine G is back. Followed by the actual performance, where Domingo brings just the most lovely honesty in his apology where in his eyes you see someone reaching out for that joy again, which everyone lets him in on. Which then he gets his release, which I do think is a little rushed in terms of pace, but HAVING SAID THAT, Domingo’s performance of just the building jubilation of feeling the warm outside air riding as a free man in a car, says it all. As it isn’t the everyday joy, it is a joy of years of denial and finding such appreciation in even seemingly such a small happiness a free person would take for granted. Domingo delivers an absolutely wonderful performance here that sells the whole concept of the film with such winning passion and charisma, while also even when the film missteps slightly, he does not, delivering honest emotion to every scene and giving such a powerful depiction of a man whose spirit endures through his acting.

Friday, 31 January 2025

Best Actor 2024: Adrien Brody in The Brutalist

Adrien Brody won his second Oscar from his second Oscar nomination for portraying László Tóth in The Brutalist.

The Brutalist follows a Hungarian architect as attempts to make it in America after having survived the Holocaust. 

After Adrien Brody’s surprise though worthy Oscar win at the young age of 29 for The Pianist, his career never quite seemed to match that break out, though to be fair to Brody there were good films and performances within the period regardless and even before this film he certainly found some prominence again via Wes Andersons’s House For Actors Who Are Talented But Maybe Didn’t Make The Best Career Choices alongside fellow 2024 nominee Edward Norton. But regardless this film feels special within the trajectory of Brody’s career particularly as one could argue that this film in some way picks up where The Pianist leaves off, though I will say while the characters share some traits in common László Tóth is not just a continuation of Władysław Szpilman in terms of Brody’s own performance. Brody simply is Tóth in a way few performances are, and it is one of those surprises that he wasn’t intended for the role originally since he simply is this person from the first bits of acting within the film. As we open his story as he is shuffling off the dark innards of a boat as he enters Ellis Island. Brody’s delivery of just his first lines establishes already an aspect of the accent that is an example of a truly great accent where it should be mentioned because not only is it natural, it grants an immediate sense of period, time and place the moment we hear his voice. It doesn’t feel like a point to show off, it just feels like the character, and the accent never overwhelms the performance; it is just a natural part of the character. And it is felt from his first words as making sure he is stolen from, we hear the man from Eastern Europe but more so the hesitating fear in his voice as he tries to secure himself. The voice of a man who has been through much, and it is no way out of hell even after he escapes the seeming hell of the bowels of this ship. 

Escaping the hell though is part of what I adore about this performance and this film, as we find Tóth leaving the ship with his friend he clearly found on his way crossing the Atlantic. We have the moment where they both see the Statue of Liberty, though skewed which is one of my favorite shots of last year, where Brody’s jubilation isn’t some surface emotion, there is such a deep cry of joy as in his eyes this is clearly a man who has been in a desperate state just a the past few days, but even more so beyond that. His reaction is of a man who believes he is seeing the promise of the American dream in this brief celebration of the men, as we see someone seeing some potential of escaping his horrific past. Unfortunately his friend only takes László to a brothel off the ship, where Brody continues to convey the history of the man as László fails to perform, and Brody brings such a remarkable awkwardness throughout the interaction. There is an attempt at a kind of tenderness that reflects a man who hasn’t been touched in any tender way even via payed overt sexuality, but still the sense of a pressured shame of his inability to perform but I’d say even more so the weighing since of his wife who he believes to be deceased at this point. Brody brings out within the “failure” of László  in the moment to hold such a clear attachment to still being stuck in that old existence. Before leaving New York to see his cousin on the outskirts of Pennsylvania, even Brody’s performance of the goodbye from his friend within the ship, is such tremendous work in terms of how much weight we bring as Brody suggests the potency of connection for László fitting a man who likely had few friends, or least not many alive friends, in the last few years of his existence. It is only the scenes before even the title card, and Brody is letting into a great novel’s details in this man’s life mostly just through his performance at this point. 

László arrives at his destination greeted by his Americanized cousin Attila (Alessandro Nivola) where Brody brings so much weight to the moment in bringing an immediate sense of the history between the two but more so Brody’s expression denotes the discovery a familiar smiling face after years of not seeing any. His performance as much as it shows the joy initially is filled with that pain before this moment. When Attila tells László that Erzsébet (Felicity Jones) is alive, Brody’s work is simply extraordinary in the soulfulness and the gamut of emotions he so naturally purges out in this single breakdown in the moment. As you see the immediate surprise, segueing into excitement then sudden sorrow and even shame as he begins to collapse, showing in these changes completely naturally portrayed by Brody as an unleashing of this emotion which also speaks to the history. The surprise of a man who truly thought his wife was dead, that sense of the separation of time from the last time he saw her, the joy of the old relationship and love within that excitement, the sorrow of the idea of the loss, but also that shame that perhaps alludes to his time at the brothel revealing almost the man punishing himself for having given into the despair that she was dead. We finally perhaps have some hope for the future as Attilia shows László around his furniture showroom along with Attila’s very American wife Audrey (Emma Laird). Brody’s great in setting up this initial state of László in this new land though as there is humble core to the demeanor as he moves around in this perpetual state of gratitude, as Attillia gives him a place to work and even a place to stay, albeit a bathroom less showroom closet essentially. Brody’s sincerity though takes this in even as an opportunity for anything and the quietude of the man is someone who will not speak out at this moment just accepting what it is that he can be given at this time. 

We see initially a progression within Brody’s performance in portraying László trying to find his strength as a man again. We have the moment where he assures another immigrant Gordon (Isaach de Bankolé) and his son that he will make sure to find them food after a charity runs out of supplies. Brody’s quiet warmth in the moment is notable as just there’s a little bit of a confidence within it, not much yet but enough as we see the man establish the friendship with Gordon, though there will be negative aspects of that friendship soon enough. Within the world we see László develop his own minimalistic chair for his cousin, and in that process there’s a quiet precision within Brody’s performance where we see man developing purpose again. He’s no longer the fearful man in a new country but slowly finding something for himself again. Brody still keeps a certain protection within his work, partially opening up but not fully. And frequently there’s so much that Brody does internally in a given scene such as when he, Attila and Audrey are celebrating and Attila tries to get László to dance with Audrey. Brody’s expression brings so much reservation with the internalized knowledge that this could lead to bigger problems, before the urging finally convinces him to do so, and Brody is great in the slight hesitation however moment of familial joy that takes over as they dance. Something that is nearly crushed as she makes dismissive remarks to a drunken László afterwards where Brody’s reaction has a remarkable sense of defeat and pathos. Lost in the moment of knowing what really to say, and Brody’s eyes rather reflect a man not wanting to give himself to more pain by getting into this conflict with her. 

Eventually Attila receives a commission from the wealthy Harry Lee Van Buren (Joe Alwyn) who wants Attila to refurbish Harry’s father Harrison Lee Van Buren (Guy Pearce)’s library, which Attila wants László to oversee. And here is where Brody absolutely excels in making us see glimpses of perhaps László before he suffered through the holocaust, right from when they are setting up estimates for the job and Brody looks around where you see the man actively trying to realize something special in his mind. When Attila is more compromising in his way about Harry, Brody’s terrific delivery of the doubled estimate is spoken with such confidence of a man who believes he can make a masterpiece out of the library. Within the sequence of the building of the library to László’s minimalistic specifications, Brody is the man now in control of the situation, where the way even how he sweeps dust with the attention to detail, and his specifications for the very exact way he wants the room constructed is with the charisma of a true genius. When something even goes wrong with the job where the removal of the glass roof that breaks, Brody’s quiet indignation over the mistake is with the man who is truly the mastermind behind the project who knows how it should all be done, and within this we see the once master architect nearly back to life. Even with Harrison unexpectedly returning home furious at the mess created by the job, there is a power in the calm that Brody brings in his replies to the anger, just by urging the man to see what the job is meant to be and then his delivery of just leaving and accepting of the man’s dismissiveness, actually isn’t a moment of weakness, rather we see still confidence in Brody of a man who knows that his work was great so doesn't need to argue for it at this point. This contrasts heavily however when Attilla soon afterwards states that the Van Buren’s are refusing any payment and worse than that is kicking him out for a false claim by Audrey that László made a pass at her. László is the opposite here in just accepting the charge and his fate of exile from his cousin’s home. Why this makes sense is Brody’s performance where in his reaction we see the far greater weight to the accusation from a family member, than just an angry customer, showing instead a heartbreaking sense of defeat in his reaction with the sense of any dream he had for America crumbling in his eyes as Atilla tosses him away like trash. 

We cut ahead in time as we find László with Gordon living in Catholic charities and eking by doing construction work, while the two of them take heroin on their off time, László doing it more so than Gordon. Brody’s portrayal of the heroin addict, which he got his first unfortunate taste of on the ship before the film began when he severely injured his nose, is a man easing away within a depression. Brody doesn’t portray it as the action that finds jubilation, rather as something that makes him able to exist in his sorrow at first, and becomes just the point of habit afterwhile. Brody’s manner in these scenes are of a man going through the motions in almost a zombified state. Brody brings just the barest energy of the man existing far more than living as we see him shoot up, work construction and dig ditches, until by chance Harrison returns looking for László. Harrison from the reaction to László’s library now has become fascinated with the work with the man and learned of his background as a renowned architect in Hungary before the war. I love the entirety of what Brody does in the scene with Pearce as the two talk about László’s past accomplishments. Initially Brody’s spark of life is still limited even as Harrison begins to complement him, I especially adore Brody’s repeated delivery of “doing construction on a Bowling Alley” that he delivers with this specific resignation as an odd acceptance of a seemingly pointless existence he now in given his talents. However when Harrison shows László’s old work we finally break that spell and Brody is again wonderful in showing the history of his connection, his old passions and his old heartbreak as he so tenderly mentions that he thought all of the work had been lost. Brody reveals the old wound and finds life again through this seeming appreciation for that lost work once again. 

Brody once more builds up László a bit to at least to some life again when Harrison invites him over to a dinner at his estate, where Harrison lavishes László with praise for his work in front of all of his guests. Where László’s plight becomes the point of focus and Brody’s amazing throughout the scene as you see such careful anxiety within the scene with just a bit of suspicion to the whole affair but an attempt at appreciation. His exasperation when noting with such sadness that it seems unlikely to himself that he will be able to find a way to get his wife and his niece over the America, we see the old despair for a moment, until Harrison’s Jewish attorney shows both the recognition for their mutual faith and informs László of a law that will help László reunite with his family. Brody’s manner changes instantly to bring sudden hope in his eyes again and seemingly just genuine appreciation to what seems possible in his life, with the most sincere delivery of his pat on the arm as a thank you to Harrison for seemingly setting all this up for him. Followed by a pivotal scene where Harrison tells his tale of dismissing his own grandparents who begged him for money before wanting to learn more about László’s method behind his minimalism. Brody is fantastic in naturally rearranging László again into what was likely his former self, more so than ever as he suggests a man believing that Harrison is speaking to him as an equal and brings those walls down to allow himself to be his old self for just a moment. And I’ll say Brody touches even just a bit of the pompousness of a genius as he describes his method as something that lasts against all other things, and while there is absolute passion in every one of the words the way Brody positions it as a doctrine. Brody now in this moment becomes the intellectual architect professor, no longer the fearful immigrant or survivor. 

Something that ends up working out as Harrison not only brought László to praise him but to also show him the setting for a community center that he wants László to build in memorial for Harrison’s late mother. Brody’s gradual progression through the scenes up to the intermission are masterful in Brody’s progression in confidence. Finding initially the right cautiousness in his requests to Harrison’s dream. Creating texture within every conversation that grants us a sense of the complication now as Brody shows László in working mode. When he first hears the idea from Harrison who mentions “losing a dream”, there’s such sincerity at first to sharing that idea and the nuance in the quiet reaction is perfection from Brody. But as is the conservations following where the job seems quite enormous in nature and Brody brings a convincing degree of mentally taking it in as a man trying to place all of the ideas Harrison is throwing at him in a single usable way. When he is forced to work with a practically minded builder Leslie Woodrow (Jonthan Hyde), Brody brings a down to earth quality as though László has been in these rooms before, albeit a long time ago, with his exciting push for his ideas over those of compromise and there is such a way that Brody accentuates the moments of specific ideas where there is just this specified intensity of a man where his passion is exact. Brody is amazing in the town hall scene where he presents his ideas to the committee, and you see László at his apex. Brody isn’t braggadocious, rather he brings that specific power to László in this scene. He brings such nuance when talking about the perception of his background where you see in his eyes going through an internalized minor exasperation beyond the prejudice, but has a force to go beyond as he presents the key to his building as a beacon literally for the community, where Brody has this easy command of someone presenting his genius where he knows his ideas are a kind of truth. A truth that in this moment he is able to convey to all others with such conviction. 

After intermission we come back some years later where we get some extreme contrasts which again Brody is an essential facet in terms of making the contrasts illuminations of the situation rather than unnatural disparate ones. The opening is when he is finally reunited with Erzsébet which is heartbreaking work from Brody again because there is only the sincerest hopeful joy until he actually sees she is in a wheelchair stricken with osteoporosis due to famine, where Brody’s expression shifts to concern than sorrow so naturally once again in conveying the years of painful separation. Still even then the way he embraces her is filled with love regardless. This is heavily contrasted though in their first night together where Brody and Jones go from the outward loving chemistry to the extreme intimacy of the two as a long married couple. They are exceptional together because even the way they bicker quickly about other matters, each's delivery to others has the old shorthand of that married couple that is fascinating as you instantly are granted the sense of history beyond the separation. Something that goes further as Erzsébet seeks László’s physical affection. An element that is performed with a particularly potent realism in the way there is something different, even more specific in that sexual intimacy yet wholly the same people however revealing that much more detail of their connection. Something though that comes out part in the lust and love we see naturally intertwined however complicated as their mutual traumas reveal themselves as authentically as the lust, as Brody brings such a sense shame and sorrow of the years apart, his failures but also pivotally the still very real love he had almost forced down within his pain. 

Contrasting that is his ongoing relationship with the project where essentially László becomes a director much of the time trying to get final cut with his project, meanwhile his “producer” in Harrison is becoming more demeaning at times and starting to purposefully undercut him. Brody’s excellent in playing the note of no longer any notion of equals when speaking with Harrison and instead his face bears years of minor abuses as he interacts with him and just keeps it down into his throat best he can. Any notion that László is his equal is obviously lost. In the project itself Brody weaponizes the frustrations of the artist into every moment of dealing with the penny pinchers that Harrison purposefully brought on, and secretly and not so secretly supported by Harrison to keep going against László’s wishes. Brody excels in taking it all in with this combination of still granting the vicious sense of purpose, of the dream, of the ambition of the wish in his eyes, but now sharpened actually by his constantly needing to fight for every aspect of his specific designs. We see the moments of holding in from the year before, no longer can be done and he comes lashing out at the people he is able to, and within that Brody offers such real conviction for that vision. Making so when a disaster hits causing Harrison to shutter the project, Brody is marvelous in the combination between defeated heartbreak as he tries to brokenly argue to keep going, only to be shouted down by Harrison, then unleashing his wrath against his own work with the anger of a man who is almost screaming at the very idea of a dream by seeing it go up in smoke, which too results in him being reprimanded but this time by his wife. And I love all these moments of Brody and Jones, as much as they’ve been through they are truly an old married couple in the way Jones cuts through while Brody quietly resigns, though doesn’t wholly give in to her wisdom each time. 

Unfortunately Harrison decides to continue the project which leads László to go with him to pick up a piece of marble to help complete the project, which during this time during a heroin induced stupor László is raped by Harrison. After this point what Brody portrays is László fundamentally twisted with  all the frustrations and disappointments of his life coming to the surface without exception which he held back before. Brody’s ferocity in the anger of these scenes is no longer a man with passion for his project fighting for it, it is now a temper without a fuse, as Brody makes every lash out such an instinctual response of someone rotting to the core of his mind. Brody expresses the fundamental horror of living with what happened to him, but as a catalyst to unleashing his anger over it all from his first days of disappointment with his cousin in America. Brody is outstanding in his long argument with Erzsébet in the car over his anger. Brody is devastating in bringing forth not just of the moment, but of the years of his frustrations all at once. His repeated, defeated, and so pained delivery of “they don’t want us here” rings so powerfully as it isn’t just a personal sense but the very idea of being this unwelcomed outsider left to fend for himself among wolves like Harrison. Unfortunately Erzsébet is similarly pained though physical anguish leading both of them, by László’s sudden choice, to give them both heroin, which they briefly escape together both through drugs and sex, until László discovers Erzsébet nearly dying from an overdose. In a moment of true horror that Brody brings such incredible heart wrenching intensity in his pleas to the hospital to save his wife and the moment where you seem to fully see just what losing her is to him. Leaving the two survivors of so much finally reconnecting, in a scene that seems simple enough yet is pivotal to both performances, and both characters. As finally the embrace doesn’t have a moment's complication, we saw love between them before, but in this moment they are as one in their loving connection each seeing the value of each, with László hardly at peace, but Brody showing someone truly in a state of comfort through this uncompromised love. Brody delivers a masterful turn, he carries the more than three hours of this film, he captures every burden of the character and to me does where it is powerful, convincing and pivotally never feels forced. As much as László goes through, as much pain as he suffers, Brody makes it all real, because that is not all there is to his performance, he finds the nuance within the ambition of the man, the genius of him, the joys he does have, the love he finds and as much as László could’ve been just a suffering symbol, Brody makes him and his journey wholly real. 

Thursday, 30 January 2025

Best Actor 2024: Timothée Chalamet in A Complete Unknown

Timothée Chalamet received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Bob Dylan in A Complete Unknown. 

A Complete Unknown is largely your run of the mill musician biopic this time about Bob Dylan. 

Timothée Chalamet has been making a name for himself as both an actor and a movie star. Taking the momentum from his Oscar nominated role in Call Me By Your Name right to several other daring roles or at least collaborations with remarkable filmmakers. Chalamet continued this trend in 2024 with his blockbuster performance in Dune Part II, and his performance in this film, which actually has been doing okay relatively speaking at the boxoffice as well. But the film seems like a required part of a notable actor’s career, and it is something that will come up at some point where they take on the role of a well known figure. Chalamet takes on a particularly well known figure in Bob Dylan, which goes into an even less remarkable trend of the musician biopic, to the point that this is retread from Mangold himself having done an extremely similar film with Walk the Line about Johnny Cash, who is also featured in this film. All that was parodied by Walk Hard successfully, and unfortunately Walk Hard had very little impact apparently when it comes to self-awareness as it failed to make many filmmakers change their ways and make their musician biopics more inventive, as except for some elements of the first act we get yet another run-of-the-mill Dewey Cox tale here. 

I will begin with the positives, Chalamet’s musical performance as Dylan is reasonably convincing, I would say he does go slightly too nasally towards the overt impression closer to John C. Reilly’s Dylan impression to be perfectly honest, but for the most part it is a believable enough approximation of Dylan’s musical performance style. Of course Chalamet doing his own singing and guitar playing is most of it, as Dylan’s stage presence is all about very little in terms of overt showmanship as he’s very minimalist when compared to say a Ray Charles or a Freddie Mercury especially. There’s not too much to imitate in that sense, but Chalamet more or less brings what he needs to in the musical performances. However in his non-singing Dylan voice he actually makes a critical error in doing his singing voice as Dylan’s talking voice, which while not dramatically opposed like Freddie Mercury’s two voices, it is still a more subdued voice with even less of that nasally extreme that is the focus for a Dylan parody. Chalamet makes this error as his speaking voice of Dylan is as much with nasal and does feel like a put on, particularly if you compare what Chalamet is doing here to what Blanchett did as her version of Dylan in the vastly superior I’m Not There, which notable given Blanchett is a woman playing a man yet felt far more natural despite even having room to be overt in her style given the film’s more impressionistic take on Dylan. 

So there’s one thing that I don’t quite believe him as Dylan, as it does feel like an actor with the too nasally voice, and his arching of his back, are all actions to create Dylan but don’t make me believe Dylan. Even within this there’s a strange choice by Chalamet where he always brings this intense glare at times, even in some of the musical performances, which is not really at all the presence you get from Dylan from that period. But the film, and Chalamet fall into what I suspected could be a pitfall of the film and the performer going in, which something I’m Not There brilliantly played with, which is that Dylan is such a mythic figure to so many, a living legend, that the filmmakers might be too timid to treat him as a person. And the film immediately makes this failure, as Dylan is looked at through the broadest of strokes to the point that we even get a character noting that he’s just this mysterious musical man. To be fair you can have a character that lives in ambiguities and the gray areas, but then at least the actor playing the part needs to know the essential truths of the character to give us hints into what might be going on behind that curtain. Unfortunately Chalamet is as lost as anyone else when it comes to who Dylan is as an actual person. He instead squarely performs into playing into the stoic mystery man who starts as the seeming young drifter just there ready to perform masterpieces, with random asides of a seeming sage wisdom at a young age, and there’s little in terms of a real build up towards a man creating an image of himself, or even letting us know just a hint of who this guy really is behind that image. 

The biggest difference between the early scenes of Dylan and the later scenes is less of anything that Chalamet does, and really all of his arc is defined by him now wearing sunglasses most of the time. Chalamet plays into the mysterious man from the opening scenes, and just goes even harder into it. When he reacts or interacts within a scene, we don’t get the sense of internal logic in his performance, something I’ll admit becomes even harder when sunglasses are blocking the window to the soul, but regardless, we get a lot of mumbling from Chalamet and general posturing as his form of Dylan. We don’t cut deeper other than he is this mystical man who will do his own thing no matter what, and the most we get is his quiet frustration. The frustration though even too comes out in just random mumblings of the mystic man still and it doesn’t allude to the real man getting annoyed by being put in a box. When he starts to expand his repertoire, builds his band, using an electric guitar, Chalamet puts no commentary on any of this within his performance, he just does it within the same Dylan “cool” as the rest of his performance. Even the climactic sequence which is causing a near riot for playing with his band at the Folk Festival, where much of the crowd boos him and calls him “Judas”. Chalamet plays all of it like it doesn’t phase him and he is just doing the same Dylan thing as the rest of his performance. It is all just the surface of Dylan and as though none of it impacts him whatsoever, which even in the real footage of Dylan’s reaction to being called Judas, you can see more emotion and more layers than Chalamet’s perfunctory note we get here. 

The aspect that theoretically should be Dylan at his most personal are when he’s with his two love interests the artist Sylvie (Elle Fanning) and fellow folk singer Joan Baez (Monica Barbaro). Notably both Fanning and Barbaro give the most naturalistic performances out of anyone in the film, which is particularly notable for Barbaro given that she too is playing a known figure though her realization of such is convincing without being overt. I mention that because they both seem like real people against Chalamet who even in these scenes still is doing his Dylan impression with too much of it just being that impression. When interacting with them he maybe brings a bit more overt charm, if rather minute, within the mannerisms but it speaks very little to anything going on internally with Dylan. He has a relationship with each woman who questions him about things, and his response is always some mumbling or to play songs. In both reactions Chalamet does little to convey whatever is going on beneath just being the wandering mysterious musician. How’s he really feeling about both women? He likes them I guess. How’s he feeling about basically betraying both of them? Unknown. How’s he feeling about relationships on the whole? Unknown. He just kind of does “I’m Dylan and I’m above it all” and calls it a day. There’s no real hidden vulnerability, there’s nothing nagging at the edges, there’s no transition for the man from his pre-fame phase to his post-fame phase. It’s just the impression of an unknowable image. The ending scene sums it up pretty well for me where we see Dylan visit the dying Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy) and we don’t see the fan, the grieving loved one, the artist looking for comfort or closure, the mentee looking for a last bit of wisdom, no what we get is just Chalamet looking above it all like Dylan as though he’s a superhero. It honestly wouldn’t have been too out of place if as Dylan was riding away from the folk festival if a kid went up to Pete Seeger (Edward Norton) and asked “Why’s he riding away” and Seeger says with his sage wisdom “Because he's the hero folk music deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll criticize him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a mumbling guardian, a watchful poet. He’s a Bob Dylan.” I joke because there’s not a person here that Chalamet plays; it is a vague image of a man that the filmmakers, and Chalamet fail to give earnest life to. He makes no commentary on this icon, offers no insight, just delivers an impression, not the worst ever, but also not a particularly good one. 

Wednesday, 29 January 2025

Best Actor 2024: Ralph Fiennes in Conclave

Ralph Fiennes received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Cardinal Thomas Lawrence in Conclave. 

Conclave follows the titular event as Catholic cardinals must decide on a new Pope, naturally complications ensue.

The great actor Ralph Fiennes finally receives Oscar recognition again, after a nearly 30 year drought, despite delivering several great performances between his last nomination to now, with I’ll note that his miss for the Grand Budapest Hotel being particularly unpleasant given he was more deserving than 4 of the nominees there and in a top five contender…but I digress. The stars finally aligned again for Fiennes within the intense drama side of his oeuvre, though personally I won’t hesitate to note my preference when he gets to be more playful. Regardless Fiennes’s talent is obvious and such talent is called upon for this film in a very specific targeted performance in playing Cardinal Lawrence, the Dean of Cardinals tasked with making sure everything runs smoothly to the election of a new Pope after the death of the much beloved former Pope. What Fiennes brings more than anything here is his considerable gravitas as a performer, which is very much required to attempt to sell this Papal thriller within the film’s overarching largely very serious approach. Fiennes being the great actor he is, certainly is game to offer his dramatic ability here to bring as much reality and severity as he can to the film. Even the way he walks and maneuvers through a scene Fiennes very much steps with purpose and has that emphasis on the considerations of it all seems to be actively weighing on him at all times. Fiennes’s brow is burdened with the thoughts of what his duty is and grants us immediately that sense of a man who is filled with doubts about his faith and about himself. 

Fiennes being the consummate professional as a performer does seek to really make anything he can in the part to add a little more while very much servicing the story. Take even the very judicious albeit simple moment of taking his time with his reading glasses where Fiennes very much adds just a believability within the whole act of ceremony, that adds in the time he takes in these moments that adds the reality of someone needed to do something minor everytime in order to proceed. But further is the exposition upon exposition that Fiennes either needs to hear or deliver, such as when it comes to going from one moment to the next of setting up the titular conclave, hearing when he gets every little tidbit of potential complication as the conclave is about to begin. Fiennes has a great ability in his delivery to often underplay the gravitas, because he has such innate gravitas it comes out more naturalistic despite being often fairly overt lines. Fiennes will emphasize at times but more often benefits from his own grand presence because he can create the levels of that weight so effortlessly. Fiennes brings the right quality in the early scenes of the film as the not quite neutral head of the Conclave, however a man who will attempt to proceed with what he sees as a degree of impartiality. Something we see in his interactions with the key players vying for the papacy which includes the liberal favorite Aldo (Stanley Tucci), the African conservative Adeyemi (Lucian Msamati), the overt Italian conservative Tedesco (Sergio Castellitto), the moderate Tremblay (John Lithgow) and the obviously going to be important if you’ve seen the Best Man surprise Cardinal late entry dark horse Benitez (Carlos Diehz). 

Fiennes again just brings an ease to his performance in hitting each note with relative but wholly convincing ease. With Tucci’s Aldo, Fiennes brings a nice warmth initially where you see the sense of an old friendship, held back just a bit for being appropriate to the situation, and even a little extra modest Fiennes’s in his delivery to suggest his admiration for the man he initially wants to see as Pope. Contrasting that is with Tedesco where Fiennes is terrific in presenting the impartiality as far as he can in his reactions to the man’s overt racism and espousing beliefs that Lawrence clearly finds deplorable. Fiennes brings the restrained disgust and quiet disinterest in the man in general within a surface graciousness. With Lithgow who Lawrence suspects is untrustworthy, in part due to an unverified claim that he as fired by the Pope, but I’m thinking more so because he’s played by John Lithgow, Fiennes brings a cautious distance and an exacting stare as he tries to uncover the truth of the man. With Benitez Fiennes offers a graciousness to the man initially within his eyes a quiet sense of interest due to the secretive nature of the man’s appointment. Lawrence though surprises all by opening the voting with a speech of his own, a character point of action that I feel still comes too early, but anyway, we get Fiennes amplifying the weight with such ease in his delivery that when Fiennes gives the speech about the sin of certainty, you absolutely believe it as the truth through his power as a performer. Fortunately, or unfortunately for Lawrence it leads to him receiving unexpected votes making him a player in this race too. 

The film then becomes the game of revelations where Fiennes must be the one often delivering the moment of action, the first coming in as early favorite Adeyemi is faced with a nun he had an affair with in the past. Leading Lawrence to confront him, and Fiennes is great in the way he brings just the right degree of a comforting warmth as he informs Adeyemi he will never be Pope, while still having this direct strength with his performance as he bluntly tells the man the truth. Meanwhile he finds damning evidence that Tremblay is crooked, where Fiennes is also terrific this time in bringing no warmth but more a righteous indignation as he stares down a man he knows to be phony. He’s also very effective in his dueling scenes between Tucci and Diehz. With Diehz, Benitez admits to voting for Lawrence, which Fiennes initially brings a real humbleness and surprise to this man. When it seems more that his vote could cost Aldo the election initially, Fiennes becomes more forceful in one of his loudest deliveries of “I don’t want your vote” which while bigger still tuned ideally for the role, as he reveals less a man trying to convince Benitez he’s not worthy, but rather trying to reinforce to himself that he is unworthy in his own mind. With Tucci in each successive scene, where it goes from Lawrence cautioning action against the much more direct Aldo to eventually Lawrence being the insistent one, is strong work from Fiennes as he goes from that more deferring quality in his early scenes, to just tipping his work to a more overt confidence to the point when he says that Aldo is too cowardly, Fiennes doesn’t deliver it with a hint of hate, but just a blunt truth in seeing his friend isn’t quite there to be the true leader. Their friendship though still feels intact and when Lawrence reveals his Pope name to Aldo, as it seems like he could win, Fiennes’s simple yet just so assured delivery of “John” shows a changed state in the relationship yet still the friendship remains. 

It probably sounds like all I do is have praise for Fiennes, which is largely true and what I’m about to get into isn’t a criticism of Fiennes rather just of the limitation of the part. Lawrence states his overall conflict with his faith and his complicated relationship with the Pope’s death since he was seeking to retire from his position just before he died, but the Pope insisted he stay. And bits of here are just a little messy, particularly the relationship part as we have a key scene where Lawrence enters the Pope’s sealed chambers to find evidence against Tremblay, and we have Fiennes break down over the Pope's death. Great emotional work from Fiennes, absolutely convincing, but the weight of it is a bit obscured because the relationship just is a little too vague at a fundamental writing level. Even the idea of Lawrence’s faith, beyond the faith in himself that part works, but the faith overall always feels indistinct for much of it then too easy by the end of it as you get the simplest good versus evil showdown between Benitez and Tedesco that makes it all seem far too easy to decide the conclave. Benitez becomes the easy person to believe in, and Lawrence is all but satisfied until we get the twist that the dark horse is intersex, but thankfully the Pope already knew about making it so Lawrence has no real decision to make. The reason I jammed that altogether is because it feels jammed together narratively, and too easily so as the previous Pope being truly all knowing makes it so Lawrence gets easy certainty by the end of it without truly having to make a decision. Which by the way,  none of this is Fiennes’s fault, he does what he can with these bits, it just never becomes as powerful of an arc to acceptance of Diehz as it could’ve been. The twist is there, but the film barely reckons with it. Having said that, Fiennes still has a final moment of greatness in his performance where he returns a turtle in the Vatican to outside, where Fiennes does so much in his walk and his expression that we see the weight from before is now alleviated, and you see man content in his more modest plight. And while I wish the final revelations to get Lawrence to this point were articulated by the script in a more dynamic, less simplistic, fashion Fiennes still delivers on that final note. Much like how Fiennes delivers throughout the film, he consistently elevates the material, every line he finds the avenue for, and is the most captivating aspect of the entirety of the film. And while this might not be my favorite performance of is, it is regardless a strong testament to his immense talent. 

Tuesday, 28 January 2025

Best Actor 2024: Sebastian Stan in The Apprentice

Sebastian Stan received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Donald Trump in The Apprentice. 

The Apprentice follows the rise of a young Donald Trump under the tutelage of crooked lawyer/power broker Roy Cohn (Jeremy Strong). 

I will say Stan getting this nomination at all is quite the achievement as he managed to go the distance of lawsuits to prevent the film from being released, dealing with his own fellow performance in A Different Man, and dealing with who I’m told is a fairly charged figure at the moment, I should note I live on Mars. But the biggest of all is the challenge of the performance itself. It is one thing to play a real person, it is another thing to play a real person that almost all viewers have a strong knowledge of how they look, behave, sound etc., it is even more so when that person has such an extreme personality and mannerisms that it is hard to see how one could possibly believably play such a part without falling into overt caricature, given caricature is the starting point. Thankfully Stan comes at that whole complication with a honestly kind of a masterful choice considering the challenge in front of him, which is approaching the creation of Trump as an objective within his performance. As the opening of the film, Stan’s amount of mannerisms that one would immediately identify as Trump are pretty light, vague would be probably the best description in that you might sense some minor accent, but nothing too thick, which keeps him from starting as that caricature. Instead Stan allows you into accepting Trump as a person as a character within the scheme of the film first, before we get to other things later. As we come in with Trump before he really is any public figure and instead is just a rich kid essentially trying to go to the restaurants to see if he can spot any actual power players. So there’s a pitfall already that Stan tiptoes around because there was potential to be too much of an innocent in the early scenes, something Stan avoids remarkably. Although corruption will be the arc, Stan’s performance isn’t from a good person to a bad person, he makes it a little more complicated than that. 

From the outset Stan’s performance rather purposefully portrays a man searching for something to be, as when you see him admiring the power players from afar it is with a keen interest in his eyes, and already some desire for whatever it is that they have. When Roy Cohn (Jeremy Strong) spots him and invites him over, Stan isn’t playing the naive innocent rather the sycophantic note looking for some kind of favor. What I think Stan does so well is his ability not to overplay a note, as to come in as the guy seeking this approval or way through others could’ve been an overdone note of just seeking so thinly, but Stan consistently brings more to the role than that. There is the putting on the front seeking to show his admiration for Cohn and his friends, but his asking for help with the cases he and his father are facing from Federal charges, there’s a genuine though not good quality in his asking of Roy to be his lawyer. Stan brings an innocence but the innocence doesn’t denote a goodness, rather just the lack of knowledge of how anything works in the world of political backdoor dealings, there is though the eagerness all the same in trying to find some way in. There is some reservation in Stan’s work, some moments where his eyes reflect someone not at all within the world at Cohn at this point when he doesn’t really want to drink or is even surprised by just how blunt Cohn is in terms of his more nefarious connections. Stan’s hesitation he plays though again is never of disgust precisely towards the immorality at least, but rather a more genuine surprise fitting for someone who really doesn’t know this way, yet in his way is making the choice to also begin taking this path himself. 

Cohn takes Trump under his wing which begins the journey of this film, and while some may balk at giving Trump any humanity to lose through the scheme of the film, I would say creating a dramatic arc tends to be more compelling that a character who starts fully evil, continues to be fully evil then stays evil. But what works about it anyways, is it is not that Trump is depicted as good, just he’s not on the level of Cohn at the start, which is a whole different thing. What Stan does so well is create a natural balance that does humanize Trump, but humanizes him in a way in which we do see a downfall in his morality, however it is a walk rather than a leap. In one of the earliest scenes between Cohn and Trump, Trump is trying to get Cohn specifically remove the federal charges that are built around denials for African Americans. The line that is key and Stan makes a meal out of is when he argues to Cohn that their company does allow African Americans into their housing with this mix of phoniness and misplaced earnestness as though he’s getting some kind of brownie points for it, before following up to explain that to get housing they have to prove they have far greater income than is the standard. Stan in the one line does several pivotal impacts, one is that his explanation isn’t a real defense of actual morality rather just a selling point, there’s no actual shame even if he’s shameless, however the actual presentation of the shamelessness and the sell is relatively subtle without someone who really knows how to sell a fairly faulty point at this avenue. Stan presents the man still learning with the leaning less of good or evil, but rather just the level of shame presented. The scene that soon follows, after Cohn  wins the case through blackmail, where Cohn coaches Trump’s phone interview, to go bigger, where Stan’s hesitating delivery to go bigger is just perfect, how he makes the awkward jumps to sell his Trump tower as bigger and better than any in the world, and the ups and downs in his rhythm are ideal in Stan’s performance. We start to hear a bit more of the Trump delivery in his voice and we start to see the basis from which he will expand in more ways than one. 

The most human elements we do see come in the scenes where we see Trump at home with his family and later also with his first wife Ivana (Maria Bakalova). The former we get two important relationships, the one with his father Fred Sr. (Martin Donovan) and Trump’s older brother Fred Jr. In the former relationship we see Stan bring the same attempted approving manner in his delivery, something he gets from Cohn, but his father almost always consistently shuts down. With his brother Stan fashions the least calculated chemistry out of any in these scenes. We just see brothers between them and even a bit of warmth in a connection. You get a sense of their history with Stan just playing a certain sincerity more so than any other moment in his entire performance, as really does, at this moment, look up to and care about his brother, despite his brother being treated as a failure by their father. The other is with Ivana, which is where Stan is extremely successful in the way he plays within the image of Trump in the eyes of her. We both get a potential better man and a much worse man in tandem in these scenes. Stan in presenting his interest in her in the lower key moments of being attracted to her and admiring her, he’s very earnest and creates even a charming chemistry between himself and Bakalova early on. However at the same time even some of his methods, we see the Cohn rub off on him, as he goes about brandishing his wealth a bit more and when doing so Stan’s performance is outstanding in the way he weaponizes these tipping points towards something broader. It becomes the shades of a side to him at first, and in turn in these moments we get a bit more of the Trump breathing, the Trump delivery all becomes a little stronger, not too much but just enough. Stan is effortlessly convincing in this and more importantly you accept him as such as he builds up just a little bit more towards the expected version of Trump. 

The build up of the nature of Trump is so key here as we see him go about getting his Trump tower financed through rather duplicitous means including a massive state tax break that even Cohn is taken aback by the boldness and shamelessness. Stan’s delivery of the scene with the potential investors is so good where he says he has it all in his “pocket”, there’s a little build to convincing himself, something he won’t need later, but there’s growing confidence once he gets the words out. His posture gets a bit more swagger and Stan shows the way Trump begins to fully own the idea of making ridiculous promises that he just assumes he can keep, or maybe not even that. Stan is amazing throughout these scenes as he begins to show the wavering sides, there’s hints of the naive guy looking for the name for himself, but we also begin to see the man who firmly believes in his own hype. Stan starts to deliver daggers when the immoral bluntness begins to take hold that much more, such as when he begins to remark his wife as his business partner, with such callous disregard. Any of the love we might’ve seen, even hints of charm in that relationship are gone, and there is just a black hole there. Something that once again seems to become amplified when Trump’s most human connection is lost after his brother dies, and the scene afterwards where Ivana tries to comfort him is just outstanding work from Stan. Stan brings such genuine devastating emotion in the emotional distress, where you see the real sense of grief in there just nearly completely bursting out at every seam of the man, but as Ivana tries to comfort him, his attacks at her to “keep away from me” are as convincing in portraying the man trying to purge himself of any of that kind of weakness even if it is in this vile twisted way that rejects his very humanity. 
 
After that point Stan turns his performance just a bit more, the voice is even closer now, the mannerisms even more overt, everything getting closer to the known image of Trump, though with just the right convincing distance given he is playing a younger Trump, where Stan rather brilliantly matches up also in giving the outward facing version of the man in his TV interview scene. Stan starts showing a man who has fully accepted his hype without exception so he begins to basically brandish his own personality, and brandishes it by turning it up to a brazen shamelessness. When Trump states his goals or his intentions with everything, there is always the degree of the oversell now which Stan does so well in just now being rid of any hesitation. Now the selling constantly is just second nature and every bit of it is just who he is now. I particularly love the scene with his father, who is now suffering from dementia, where Stan has still a certain petulance to it, as the son of the disapproving father but now his manner towards him is mocking as the man with the power wanting to show his dad up instead of getting his  approval. His scenes with Bakalova are particularly disturbing because where Bakalova still plays towards someone trying to connect in affection with one another, Stan presents a man who dismisses her as just a waste of time for himself at this point. When he says he is no longer attracted to her, Stan is truly brutal, because there’s not a hint of the old affection but rather speaks like he’s talking about his old car that has gotten too rusty. He only shows any genuine, though not positive, emotion when she begins to make fun of him back, where Stan brings such a terrifying degree of ferocious pathetic insecurity as he goes about raping her as an act of pure hatred. 

After that we get to basically the final form of Trump where Stan’s masterful approach comes fully to fruition, where he has become just about the Trump caricature in terms of the mannerisms, the intonation of his voice, the effort of his breathing, the "stank face", the common places of impression are now there, but the way Stan went about it was to make us completely believe him. He does not become a cartoon version, rather we’ve seen him grow into this state bit by bit, so he becomes completely believable even when being the broadest version of Trump. The fascinating part is that Stan does this little by little so eloquently that you have just accepted him as such, but even more so he’s so successfully makes it completely go hand in hand with the arc of Trump fully embracing corruption. Where in Strong’s performance we saw the humanity of Cohn as he contracts AIDS and starts dying, Stan on the other hand purges any remaining feature of Trump’s humanity as such a striking contrast to Strong. Now when we see Stan in the boardroom, on tv or wherever, Stan absolutely owns every word, so confidently, so much without hesitation, not a hint of shame, in fact an overt shamelessness to everything he does. Stan shows that Trump is no longer playing the part he is the part and just now believes himself to be everything he claims he is. Even little moments that are comedic speak to this, such as arguing with his doctor over basic health facts, or announcing his enjoyment of cheese balls, Stan speaks as a man so sure of every idea he has in his head that there is no argument he can lose, at least in his own mind. That’s combined with the callousness now being something he doesn’t even need to try for. One moment that would seem mostly about Strong, where Cohn falls apart realizing that his friendship with Trump has been meaningless, Stan is as important, because watch him throughout the scene, there isn’t a hint of empathy or care, every reaction from Stan is just that he’s seeing a burden he has to deal with, not a friend he’s trying to celebrate one last time. Stan delivers a truly great performance that avoids every potential pitfall he could’ve fallen into. Honestly he performs something I thought nearly impossible, since it would be so easy to have just become a surface caricature. Stan makes you believe him as Trump, makes you believe this portrait of Trump, which doesn’t reject the mannerisms or voice, but rather finds a way to cultivate it slowly into an essential final facet on this striking portrait of corruption. 

Monday, 27 January 2025

Best Actor 2024

 And the Nominees Are:

Timothée Chalamet in A Complete Unknown 

Colman Domingo in Sing Sing

Adrien Brody in The Brutalist

Ralph Fiennes in Conclave

Sebastian Stan in The Apprentice