Friday, 17 October 2025

Alternate Best Actor 2004: Tony Leung in 2046

Tony Leung Chiu-wai did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Mr. Chow in 2046.

2046 is the sequel to In The Mood For Love as we follow Mr. Chow after that “not quite” love affair. 

2046 honestly went beyond my expectations for a sequel to the seemingly perfect self-enclosed effort of In the Mood For Love. As that film seems like it should never have a sequel but if there’s a story to tell one can always make a sequel even when it seems like there shouldn’t have been one. In this instance it doesn’t at all touch what happened so beautifully in that previous film, that is wisely guarded as the perfection that it is, what 2046 posits is how does a man continue on after that perfect romance that he never happened. Focusing on Leung’s Mr. Chow, a character who exists within the potential alternative romantic arrangements, is frequently found in the small apartments he inhabits. Leung’s performance, which in the previous film was all about this specific state of being and realizing the moments of quiet vulnerability, is a much more varied and open performance, befitting a man who in his way lost it all but needs to continue regardless. Within each potential alternative Leung’s performance then becomes a reflection of this attempt to deal with essentially missing out on what seemed like his ideal happiness with Mrs. Su (Maggie Cheung). What we see in the film is different forms of how he expresses himself through each new woman in his life, some romantic some not, but all in reaction to the unconsummated relationship that will forever define his life. 

The first ironically played by Carina Lau, Leung’s eventual actual wife, is the first and seemingly most obvious messy rebound attempt at a relationship. Leung’s great in this relatively brief attempted rekindling of a love affair where there’s kind of the innate sense of failure behind his attempted romantic overtures. There’s an immediate sense of defeat in every moment of Leung’s reactions where he potently suggests Chow as someone looking essentially for some reassuring romance but also already preemptively seeing it as something that will work out. Leung presents someone very lost within himself without an obvious avenue for escape through another. So naturally this one does not work out particularly well particularly when she doesn’t seem overly interested in Chow to begin with and disappears soon afterwards, possibly due to violent circumstances. So Mr. Chow returns as his apartment dweller but also initially for financial need becomes a fiction writer again, something that had been sparked by his relationship with Mrs. Su, and in a way the moments of speaking on the writing, there's a bit more a spark Leung himself brings suggesting that old romance when there’s this optimism in the man he speaks of in his writing. 

That aspect of his writing is something the film returns to and is an aspect to yet another set of relationships for Mr. Chow, however these are largely platonic and often observational. As Mr. Chow also observes and occasionally interacts with the landlord’s daughters, at two separate times in his life. Leung is great in fashioning in these interactions the attempt at some kind of wisdom of relationships in these moments even when it involves rejecting one of the daughter’s advances. Leung brings a more reflective quality in his way of watching the lives of these women play out in their own ways, where there is an ease, even a gentle humor about him at these times. Leung excelling particularly when he gets to speak what he can say he’s learned in any way, of course still in his own way, such as when speaking about his relationship with Mrs. Su and what they wrote together. Leung again delivers a combination of a maturity and pathos in these moments, where you do see the undercurrent of the weight of that memory that very much defines the man, while also having the wistful distance of someone showing just how much appreciation Mr. Chow has for that time even if those thoughts are both a burden and a relief. A very specific emotion that Leung not only makes so naturally observed, but also pulls you into this mind frame so potently. 

An aspect that we see when Mr. Chow finds a literal different Ms. Su (Gong Li) who is a gambler he comes across after he has lost much money outside of Hong Kong. This is not a recreation of any sort with the other Su, rather Leung finds a new path in his portrayal of this situation as he presents a kind of fascination with her that isn’t typical lust nor real affection, rather just almost her as a figure beyond his normal conception of reality. She is an enigma and Leung is excellent in the way his performance creates that mystery particularly in terms of the emotional impact it has on Mr. Chow. Leung brings such a depth within the emotions of being captured by this new woman but this one is not an equal understanding of romance even as they become lovers. Rather this Su very much has all the power with Mr. Chow followed along in his way. Leung articulates the imperfectness of this relationship, even as the allure of it is always as obvious each time he looks at the unique woman. All the way till their relationship is based on only a gambling bet where Chow has already lost in a way, and Leung’s performance is absolutely pitch perfect in his raise of the losing hand. As there is the awareness even if there is also the hope about the action, something where Leung creates the sense of the man understanding the reason for the failure of this relationship set in a single hand, but also still that dreamers wish to delude himself still. 

For me the most captivating of all the relationships featured however is the one with his neighbor Bai Ling (Zhang Ziyi). Leung has maybe the most sparks here but what’s fascinating is it is a completely different spark than the ones we saw with Cheung. A completely different relationship as the two begin at the point of open flirtation that is more joking than anything else. Real in the sense of attractive but humorous in the approach of each making it a bit of a game. Leung is amazing in the way he shows a different side of Chow here who is going into this relationship with purposefully a fun loving but also blithe attitude of someone just wanting to essentially have some fun. And the two are so much fun together as they just trade each other off in terms of their pseudo insults, and their pseudo lusty overtures. They are magnificent in every sly smile and more open glance. This relationship isn’t about the unsaid, it is about the very openly said and the two are great in playing into romance that very much isn’t about any kind of pure love, where the lust is very much a given. Every one of their scenes together is a little gem that does build, where the complication comes as Bai Ling wants something more from it, and Chow does not. I love the hope of it as Chow’s drunken state he more genuinely reaches out probably thinking of Mrs. Su, but when somber seems to avoid any meaning with Bai beyond sexual desire. Leung’s performance shows that even in this very much consummated relationship a man is still defined by the one that got away from him. As the moments of his rejections of Bai Ling’s want to have more, Leung’s subtle unease beneath the flirty smile presents the honest emotion that the man still wants to reveal to anything other than in his stories or to a tree. Leung delivers a great follow-up performance because he successfully expands the role but also powerfully never loses the strength of his original work, by presenting a man still ever haunted however has to continue to live on.

59 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast. Thoughts on Direction, Cinematography and Production Design.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Could you review Pacino next.

Michael McCarthy said...

Thrilled you loved Leung and the film, I found both absolutely sublime.

RatedRStar said...

Louis: Is this along with In the Mood for Love possibly your favourite Hong Kong films ever? I never would have predicted that lol even though I really like the film and performance as well. This was his final HK award win for nearly 19 years.

Calvin Law said...

I love the film but man, I probably need to rewatch it to appreciate it even more, especially Leung's performance. Zhang's my win for the year in Supporting Actress.

Calvin Law said...

Also, Leung with that moustache is probably up there with 'best anyone has ever looked in a film' rankings.

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis, knowing you're a bit of a history buff, could I get your thoughts on this trailer for the upcoming show Death by Lightning? I'm curious about your perspective on the casting choices and the tone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jopqrSojQE

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis, what do you think of this improv bit?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4VMVM3ppS0I

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Just to be absolutely sure, is Phil Davis supporting in Vera Drake and is he being saved for the time being.

RatedRStar said...

Luke: I mean 2004 supporting is not exactly the most red hot category in terms of contenders lol.

Luke Higham said...

RatedRStar: I know. I said for the time being because Louis doesn't want to give too much away.

A said...

Luke: Any predictions for who Louis will review for supporting?

Luke Higham said...

A: Are you referring to 04 or 25.

A said...

Luke: 2004 (you can give 25 if you want).

A said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

Peter O'Toole in Troy
Phil Davis in Vera Drake
Javier Bardem and Barry Shabaka Henley in Collateral
Rip Torn and Ben Stiller in Dodgeball

I would've said Alan Tudyk in I, Robot but I think Louis is giving him a 4 at most.

On 25, I'd rather wait until New Year for both Official and Alternate.

A said...

Luke: Do you think Hoffman will retain his 5 for Along Came Polly?

Luke Higham said...

A: Yes. Anyway I've never been a pro-downgrade guy unless he truly feels it himself. I'm fine with others hoping for someone else to get the overall victory. I think O'Toole's the most feasible contender due to Louis' past comments about his work there.

RatedRStar said...

Luke: So the lowest ever requested review score was by me, for the late Liu Kai Chi (who was actually a solid character actor despite my mistake) you reckon I might top it lol?

Luke Higham said...

RatedRStar: Unless you really want to die on your sword, I personally hope not. Wiseau reviews are more acceptable.

Emi Grant said...

Happy for another 5 for Leung

Louis Morgan said...

Roofman is an effective change of pace for Cianfrance after the failure of the excessively self-serious The Light Between Oceans, as he stretching his tonal abilities for essentially a largely comedic take on Gosling's act from Place Beyond the Pines, though this is based, seemingly very closely, on a true story. There is fun to be had on the comedic curiosity of the scenario but also with certain heist elements that Cianfrance gives the right sort of cinematic "step by step" appreciation to. But there is more here of someone reckoning with what is important and mistakes of his life which do emotionally resonate.

Tatum - 4
Dunst - 4
Mendelsohn - 3
Dinklage - 3.5
Temple - 2.5
Cohen - 3
Stanfield - 3.5
Diaz - 2.5

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

I love that Leung has another 5. I hate that I psyched myself out of watching this sooner because of just how untouchable In the Mood for Love is to me, and I'll rectify that asap.

Louis: Thoughts on the cast of Roofman?

J96 said...

RIP Samantha Eggar

Harris Marlowe said...

Luke and A: I really hope PSH holds onto his 5 for Along Came Polly, even though I realize it's likely he'll no longer be the blog's 2004 Supporting Actor winner.

A said...

Louis: What are the most disturbing TV scenes you've ever seen?

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: What are in your opinion the biggest misconceptions about what makes an actor good or bad?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Ytrewq: For me, it's the idea that chameleon/transformative acting is automatically considered 'better' than acting which is less externalized (although both can result in great work). I've always found it nonsensical when people seem to think accent work is what makes a great actor.

Tim said...

for me it's "He always plays himself"

Anonymous said...

Louis: I've been waiting for this post to finally ask you a Tarantino fetish question: What are the movies with the best barefoot scenes?

1. The Barefoot Contessa
2. 2046
3. Long Day’s Journey Into Night (2018)
4. Inglourious Basterds
5. Badlands
6. The Lego Movie 2
7. Inferno (1980)
8. 10 Cloverfield Lane
9. Evil Dead Rise
10. Black Bear

Robert MacFarlane said...

What

Harris Marlowe said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Harris Marlowe said...

Anon: Somebody has too much time on their hands, I see.

A said...

Too much time on their feet.

Marcus said...

Well that's a new question here for sure.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Eh, who am I to kinkshame?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: What are some of your favorite song uses in trailers? The great use of 'Forever Young' in Marty Supreme got me thinking about this, alongside 'Creep' for The Social Network.

8000S said...

Louis: Your cast for a Nolan version of Mr. Arkadin.

Anonymous said...

I said the question had a Tarantino's fetish.

Perfectionist said...

Anonymous: Valid question 🤣🤣. Well... I hope you get your response dude.

Louis Morgan said...

Harris:

McConaughey - (His performance is one that falls into expectedly good but never quite as powerful as you’d like to be. Although I’d say this is far more material than McConaughey, as McConaughey brings in his physical work the severity of every step of the situation internalized within his being while bringing the strength of essentially someone stepping up in a time of absolute necessity. The problem is the personal struggle of someone who feels himself a failure in life is where the film just doesn’t quite give him enough ammo to make something special out of it. It’s a shade of an idea, a weight that McConaughey does carry, but it isn’t enough to truly allow him to run with it to something far more powerful.)

Ferrera - (She’s good like McConaughey in terms of portraying the immediate intensity of the situation however her character is pretty limited beyond that.)

Vasquez - (Brings a lot in playing technically expository moments of playing the emotional turmoil of someone who needs to hold it all together and keep going despite facing such hardship. He artfully plays that building internalization of his discontent that finally becomes external by his later scenes in a particularly cathartic and convincing fashion, while still maintaining the right believable kind of leader’s dignity.)

Luke:

Watson & Ullman - 4(Speaks to the greater potential of the film their performances as both really are quite captivating in what they have with Ullman bringing such a sense of history of someone whose been doing the job for awhile and is going at it with a very meat and potatoes sensibility. Meanwhile Watson is great in the more exact nature of her performance of someone trying to do specific work, while offering the main personnel challenge to Steve within the scheme of film. Unfortunately I think it reveals the limitations of the film because we get great starting points to the performances that can’t quite go towards greatness because the film doesn’t bring enough to them.)

Ajikawo - 3.5(Less focused upon but also good in portraying the quieter conviction of her circumstances of creating empathy but also a certain level of exasperation.)

Lycurgo - 4(A performance that again if the film kind of went a little further I think had a great deal of potential. As his work is very moving particularly his phone call where he he is heartbreaking in portraying the slow realization of his family’s rejection over his face, going from a kind of kid’s disbelief, to an adult disregard, to a kid’s complete heartbreak and then just the rage of it all in between. It is a moving performance per every bit we get of him, from his moments of greater levity to those intense scenes, there’s a real power to his work even if again the film doesn’t quite give the room to take that next step towards something even greater.)

Louis Morgan said...


The other boys - (All good as well and particularly convincing in playing the dangerous emotional swings where there’s moments of pathos, mixed in with hormonal range, and just posturing. They’re all good and again why I think expansion wouldn’t have been the worst idea.)

Zhang - 5(I’m surprised it took so long for me to even hear about this performance because she is extraordinary here, and I’m usually a big fan of Zhang to begin with. Her performance here though is absolutely pitch perfect. Starting with her chemistry with Leung where she is amazing in playing within the shifting natures of their interactions. As initially it is more so just that flirtation jesting with one another, where Zhang’s great in showing how much fun and pleasure she is getting initially out of just playing the game with him. Zhang even within these moments brings so much depth and nuance within the interactions. As even in the moment of playfulness you see her looking at Mr. Chow with a bit more to calculate the situation in her head and almost as a potential for her happiness. Something we see brilliantly performed as she reacts to the drunken attempt at reaching out to her and Zhang's portrayal of her determining whether or not to accept his hand says so much without a word. As her scenes progress she just simply shines particularly when they are a couple and just having their fun and games and you see her running with it for a bit. When you see her considering more than just a fling essentially, Zhang is so moving in showing the way she’s trying to reach out within the playfulness at first, not fully opening up but just attempting to try to make him understand that there is a seriousness to the situation after all in her mind. Something she subtly reveals yet so powerfully so as she opens herself up to attempting to make a greater connection, where Zhang is heartbreaking by revealing the wholly genuine desire on her end for just a pure tendon connection with Mr. Chow, something he can’t quite provide. She brings such a dynamic energy every moment she is onscreen and is just captivating to watch. Because what is so marvelous is the way she develops a different yet also wholly winning chemistry with Leung, it isn’t the perfect pure romance of his chemistry with Cheung, it is rather a messy attempt at love, and in doing so creates its own beautiful kind of tragedy.)

Gong - 4(Brings an enigmatic power to her performance, where she’s neither cold nor warm, and is rather fascinating in the juxtaposition of her character. Bringing some distance, yet internalized understanding of how she operates. There’s an innate confidence but not a cruelty, even in the moment of rejection, rather Li’s performance emphasizes this innate understanding of the relationship from the outset, without notions or delusions, and in turns that exactness ends up cutting off brutally albeit in a way that never is brutal.)

Lau - 4(A relatively short performance, yet she does bring her own unique energy and chemistry with Leung within her shorter segment. Bringing probably the most directness in her performance that works in contrast to the others as someone most open with her feelings and in turns making it only logical then that she and Chow couldn’t last too long together.)

Cheung - 3.5(Her performance is of essentially a memory in the story within a story, but is successful in being this haunting presence in her appearances, where she makes an impact even in silence.)

Louis Morgan said...


Wong’s direction is some of my favorite work of his as once again he is one of the greatest when it comes to creating emotional intimacy with his characters, despite leaving so much unsaid in terms of the actual dialogue. The magic of his work is on display once again, and I almost ponder if it is the intimacy of the settings he uses, which somehow are never claustrophobic despite putting his characters often in small rooms or hallways. And then the contrast of the moments of expansion which are particularly pointed when they appear each time. Whatever it is precisely, Wong does it like no other in the specifics, and here he manages to expand the notions by playing with the different relationships, so the moments he creates those intimacies for a difference. Whether it is having the playful sex scene feel so warm in one moment, or the moment of focusing on the face of defeat yet understanding in the gambling game, the use of the Christmas Song, that instantly sets us into a very specific mental space of the Christmas time and looking for comfort, every choice just seems right in making us seem part of Mr. Chow’s world and more specifically his mind. Something that is expanded greatly at the greatest risk of the sci-fi shifts scenes, all that I loved, in their particular idiosyncrasy, where as much as Wong crafts a new world, the emotional fixation of the situation is carrying over still from Mr. Chow’s experience. It is incredible work because it one challenge after another as a true expansion of what he did so specifically in In the Mood For Love, it is an array where he didn’t at all lose his touch.

The cinematography in many ways is a continuation of the specific beauty of In the Mood for Love, where the vibrancy of the colors in the interior space is so uniquely captivating. There are many such shots, where Wong and crew light his performers so wonderfully each and every time, but fascinatingly is the way it doesn’t become glossy, rather it creates that intimacy. The composition and framing of every shot is just so immaculate and so specific to the storytelling once again. Although again this has a sudden switch in style once again with the sci-fi, where there are some constants but the lighting scheme changes to more overt colors, and successfully so, where it manages to be different without clashing with the rest of the film.

The PD is largely a continuation of those spaces of In the Mood For Love, where the quality certainly adds to that noted intimacy of everything I’ve mentioned so far. But again there is that switch of the sci-fi where the work is remarkable and really key to the sequence working. Because it is of a different film in the slightly more overt sets, but thankfully adds a new spice without overflowing the meal.

RatedRStar:

Yes.

Louis Morgan said...

Harris:

The tone looks like it could go either way, maybe cheekily brilliant in its slightly modern sensibilities but it could also make everything kind of dumb if not handled properly.

Casting wise looks great, from Shannon fitting to period, Macfadyen with a juicy role, Offerman seeming ideal for Arthur, even Whigham as Roscoe Conkling. I’ll certainly check it out if the reviews are decent, as I always love a piece covering the less often portrayed parts of American history.

Robert:

An amusing bit, particularly the Miss Piggy swing followed by appropriately fitting combo between violence and kiss as per Piggy.

Luke:

Davis is supporting.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on the screenplay to 2046? (and I suppose you'll be categorising it as adapted given its sequel status)

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the trailer for Raimi's Send Help?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on Rhea Perlman, Gaby Hoffmann, Simon Rex, Eva Jade Halford & Alia Shawkat in Poker Face.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Since it's spooky season, here's a proposed cast I just thought of for a 2020s The Exorcist:

Father Karras: Franz Rogowski
Chris MacNeil: Rachel McAdams
Father Merrin: Liam Neeson
Lieutenant Kinderman: Dean Norris
Regan MacNeil: Abby Ryder Fortson
Pazuzu (voice): Steve Blum

Directed by...ehh, I'd welcome some suggestions here

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Addendum to last sentence: Demonic posession and exorcism plots seem to be a breeding ground for shitty horror films, so you'd need a real pro to make one look prestige.

Luke Higham said...

Ytrewq: Out of today's crop, probably Arkasha Stevenson. The First Omen was much better than it had any right to be.

Perfectionist said...

Ytrewq: Rogowski as Karras is a sensational choice.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Tatum - (I will say if Cianfrance had gotten Gosling for this role maybe the film would’ve tipped even higher for me, only because it would’ve been so pitch perfect for him. Having said that, Tatum is good here, though there are a couple moments where he tips just ever so slightly into broader than he needs to be in a few moments. Not enough though to make this less than a good performance. Where Tatum does do well in bridging the tones of the foolish criminal who can come up with wise plans theoretically but cause him to end up in stupid situations. Tatum finds the right natural charm within the very specific haplessness where you see the criminal, who is a criminal but not quite made out to be one either. But where Tatum is most impressive here is playing the scenes of his character genuinely dealing with the fallout of his actions beyond the charm. In these moments Tatum finds some real emotional depth from the man coming to terms with the lives he’ll hurt and not be able to serve in his choice to try to make the easy path. Tatum delivers on taking the more emotional moments and giving them a moving honesty.)

Dunst - (After having not been impressed with a few of her more recent turns, I’m glad I found this one to remind me of her talents. A performance that is in many ways working within a low key framework of someone just seeking to get by and enjoy life to the extent that she can within the situation she can. Dunst brings the right naturalistic quality in playing the love interest with a believability in her actions and reactions to Tatum where she has kind of reserved opening up of herself towards a certain level of vulnerability with him. She makes the progressive feel very genuine and too hits the real honest sense of betrayal in the later moments of the film.)

Dinklage - (Entertaining enough in just playing the jerk note, with a few alternative reactions of surprise and even a bit of fear later on. Dinklage hits those notes well and kind of a nice alternative role for him in terms of emphasizing his character as not very likable in any sense. Although bringing one later moment where he switches up in such a natural and in the end moving fashion.)

Stanfield - (Mostly there to deliver exposition but he does it effectively by just bringing a certain level of style to every bit of exposition he gets.)

Mendelsohn - (Very brief role for him but brings the right type of easy going welcoming energy in his brief bits.)

Cohen - (Weirdest career trajectory emphasized by his appearance here compared to his appearance in his last Cianfrance collaboration. But regardless, brings a nice goofy energy and delivers on his one specific duty of playing meek, then meek…but fed up effectively in creating the payoff for his character).

A:

At home with the killer - True Detective
Rat Torture - Game of Thrones
Maddie's Murder - Twin Peaks
Gotta light? - Twin Peaks The Return

Ytrewq:

Yelling = Bad automatically
Quiet = Good automatically
Transformative being automatically a greater achievement than a non-transformative performance.

But really any opinion that forgets how important context is to every performance.

But also have seen sometimes undercutting a performance with a character that doesn’t have an arc is automatically worse than one with an arc. Whereas if a performer can make a character consistently compelling without a discernible arc, that too can be a notable achievement.

Tahmeed:

Love both of those.

"Hurt" - Logan
"I think We're Alone Now" - 10 Cloverfield Lane
"Black Skinhead" - The Wolf of Wall Street
"Friction" - Mission Impossible: Fallout
"Toxic" - Promising Young Woman
"What a Wonderful World" - Inherent Vice
"Life on Mars" - Licorice Pizza

Louis Morgan said...

8000's:

Mr. Arkadin 2020's directed by Christopher Nolan:

Guy Van Stratten: Josh O'Connor
Mr. Arkadin: Mark Rylance
Mily: Florence Pugh
Raina: Ana de Armas
Jakob Zouk: Tom Conti
Bracco: Ben Kingsley
Burgomil Trebitsch: Kenneth Branagh
Bob: Robert Pattinson
The Professor: Casey Affleck
Thaddeus: Sebastian Stan

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis, your thoughts on this cast for a '60s The Favourite directed by Billy Wilder?

Bette Davis as Queen Anne
Audrey Hepburn as Sarah Churchill (I think she has the range for this)
Shirley MacLaine as Abigail Hill

Calvin Law said...

Perfectionist: Rogowski is perfect. And for a choice for director for that, I might suggest Rose Glass, actually.

Tim said...

Harris: Who would be Robert Harley in that?

Harris Marlowe said...

I'll steal our host's past answer for a 60s version and say David Warner.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: thoughts on this 2020s Bong Joon-ho version of The Ladykillers and 2020s Park Chan-wook version of Far From the Madding Crowd?

Professor Marcus: Giancarlo Esposito (could be the perfect role for him to break out of typecasting)
Major Courtney: Will Patton
Louis Harvey: Clarence Maclin
Harry Robinson: Joseph Quinn
One-Round: Ma Dong-seok

Bathsheba Everdeen: Greta Lee
Sergeant Troy: Steven Yeun
William Boldwood: Lee Byung-hun
Gabriel Oak: Charles Melton