Fernando Rey did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning Cannes, for portraying Luis in Elisa, Vida Mía.
Elisa, Vida Mía explores a woman Elisa (Geraldine Chaplin), examining her life while staying with her father on a secluded farmhouse.
Fernando Rey also received some critical mentions for his work in Buñuel's That Obscure Object of Desire, in a dubbed performance as a rich older man lusting after an enigmatic if not impish younger woman. Where, though dubbed, Rey's physical work certainly was effective there in terms of portraying the growing frustrations in the man, mixed in with the immediate sexual fascinations that keep him going back. Rey, in his own voice, also is featured here in a film that is in part about the relationship between an older man and younger woman, though this time father and daughter, though in both instances his co-stars get the showier roles. Rey's role here is very subdued here, and only sometimes the focus as we find him just being the genial father figure who his extended family has come to visit. He brings a quiet warmth about him in just his modest interactions but doesn't put much on it other than just a man happy to see his family. So much that he's more than eager to invite his daughter to stay with him so they can connect more. And if that seems the setup for a two hander where the two reconnect after so many years, you'd be incorrect because the focal point is much more Chaplin as Elisa than it is Rey as Luis.
Rey comes in and out of the film, much as the film itself comes and in and out of its perspectives that at times seems straightforward enough about Elisa just thinking about her life, however there are common swerves both into flashbacks and into fantasies involving the people she knows. Rey is interspersed into various moments, such as telling Elisa about a man he thinks might be a murderer visiting a grave, that he does little about, or telling her about his writing that he doesn't like to be pretensions about. Which Rey's own performance is pretty gentle, and his delivery is just of this sharing calm of a man just wanting to share a bit with his daughter without much more than that. At times she shares with him, her thoughts, her struggles, and with any Rey brings an earnest empathy in any given scene. One that creates the right sense of the father, but also the father who has not always been there recently so he's catching up as a well as being there now. We get a few other bits, such as Luis bringing Elisa to his school, which we get the same general consistent demeanor as he "shows off" his daughter with a natural affability. Rey is wholly consistent, however I wouldn't say he's not exactly overshadowed by Chaplin, because he is. And mostly he's a welcome enough presence but not much more than that. We occasional get an alternative moment, such as when his health begins to fail, which Rey carries the right sort of physical hesitations and exhaustion however it's not a focal point. We even get a completely random incest scene, well Chaplin also plays her own mother, so maybe it's not supposed to be that, either way. Rey delivers a fine performance here, you certainly sense the history between the two, the limited growth, the understanding, the care, but also the separation. It is largely of reactions, however Rey effectively brings this internal within his own work, even if this is very much Chaplin's film.
30 comments:
Louis: Rating and thoughts on Chaplin.
1. Hauer
2. Plotnikov
3. Devane
4. Rey
5. S.
1. Hauer
2. Plotnikov
3. Devane
4. Bruno
5. Rey
1. Hauer
2. Devane
3. Plotnikov
4. Bruno
5. Rey
1. Hauer
2. Plotnikov
3. Bruno
4. Devane
5. Rey
1. Hauer
2. Plotnikov
3. Devane
4. Bruno
5. Rey
Louis: What do you think of the Twilight Zone episodes A World of Difference and The Silence?
Louis: Thoughts on Archie Barnes in House of the Dragon
1. Plotnikov
2. Hauer
3. Devane
4. Bruno S.
5. Rey
Louis: I know it's still way to early to think of any of this, but if you had to put your money on one of the leading men from Challengers being nominated for Best Actor, who would it be?
I think O'Connor might be the most excusable to put in Supporting, but idk if either man would be a guarantee.
I watched Rolling Thunder. I liked it quite a bit. Devane is great.
Devane-4.5
Jones-3.5
Haynes-2
Best-2.5
Askew-3
Driscoll-2.5
Emi: If I recall correctly, Faist has the least screentime out of the three leads. And given the Academy's (stupid) trend of putting the more 'servile' performance in Supporting...worth a think I guess.
Of course, what I think is most likely is pushing Zendaya lead and both men Supporting.
1. Plotnikov
2. Hauer
3. Devane
4. Bruno
5. Rey
1. Plotnikov
2. Hauer
3. Devane
4. Bruno
5. Rey
5º Fernando Rey
4º Bruno S.
3º Boris Plotnikov
2º William Devane
1º Rutger Hauer
Louis: I recommend Reginaldo Faria in Lucio Flavio. The first major work in the career of director Héctor Babenco.
Tahmeed: Both O'Connor and Faist being placed in Supporting sounds very plausible, and I'd hate that tbh.
Here's my shot in the dark, I guess:
1. Plotnikov
2. Hauer
3. Devane
4. Rey
5. S.
Luke:
Chaplin - 5(Going in line with a lot of her fascinating work from this period, as she manages to create such a captivating performance that maneuvers so much within every different segment. She gives just a straightforward and honest performance on one front in terms of just portraying this woman contemplating where she is exactly in her life. Chaplin finds so much power in the most modest of deliveries just within her expressions that convey such a potent emotion within them. She is able to convey so much history in every moment of explaining her choices in life or her frustrations with others so beautifully. She's also though completely successful in being whatever it is her character is thinking about, whether that is sort of her more regal portrayal of her mother in moments, or her sudden performance as a murder victim. She manages to grant such an internal logic within so many moments that just lets the cameras focus on her, none that she wastes through her always captivating performance. When she is staring at the camera she never leaves it as just pensive nothing, but rather lets us into this sort of way she's going through so many thoughts to try to figure out where she is.)
Tony:
A World of Difference is an interesting if not entirely successful episode, that I think this idea of a man broken between two worlds seemingly literally and kind of perhaps speaks a lot to Richard Matheson's view of Hollywood that the businessman is the happy man and the actor is miserable. And kind of the idea of exploring what it is that makes a man happy and there is certainly a tension in the overall sense of needing to escape. At the same time, the kind of "whatever" logic, feels less thought out than some other episodes, and it doesn't quite feel as poignant as some other episodes that cover similar subject matter like Walking Distance and A Stop at Willoughby.
I actually don't think I've ever watched the Silence.
A:
Barnes for his short screen time absolutely delivered on the tough young man beyond his years, without going into each posturing that could've been less convincing or ridiculous. He rather owns his manner in just his way of delivering every word with the utmost conviction and physical manner of someone who unquestionably believes in his truth. And when he dispenses justice there is real power to his performance by just how directly he says every line and of someone without hesitation.
Emi:
I think O'Connor because he plays the more brazen character would be more likely to lead, with Faist's meeker character being put supporting. Their minor screentime discrepancy also favors O'Connor in lead, though both should be lead. I will say though I think there is a scenario, if it seems like it's a fringe player rather than a major player as we get closer, I think they could push O'Connor if he seems like the better bet of the two overall in terms getting in.
I think in all likelihood both will get forgotten because this is one of the toughest lies I've seen to try to not declare this a co-lead situation, and sometimes when the fraud is too severe voters will reject unless it could magically pull a Judas and Black Messiah.
Louis: Your thoughts on Duff and Ryan in A World of Difference, and what was your interpretation of what was "really" going on?
Louis: If Martin Scorsese doesn't direct The Wager as it's been rumoured, who would be your choice to direct. I'd be happy if he wasn't involved so we wouldn't have a DiCaprio miscasting.
Louis: I am just imagining if we were around covering the Oscar season for 1977 what your reaction would have been when the nominees for the Golden Globe for Best Actor in a Drama were announced lol. I imagine you would not have been very happy.
Tony:
Duff is decent however I don't think he quite gets to the heights of the potential in the part, as it is more of surface tension that he creates with his performance than giving you a true internalized sense of what the character is going through. He plays more so in the moment of each interaction/reaction, and is already at kind of a peak that he doesn't quite build in one direction or another that could've made this something truly captivating. It's still a good performance but I wouldn't call it a great one.
Ryan I think is fine at being a pretty straightforward "shrew" type role, not much is asked of her, but I think she does that intense disgust effectively to make it someone you definitely wouldn't want to have to live with.
My interpretation is it is an actor performing the part of the businessman, who is having a nervous breakdown that is causing him to get lost in the part, a bit like like Colman in A Double Life.
Luke:
Well Eggers will be by go to pick for any period piece at the moment, so him.
RatedRStar:
Yes, it would probably be something like, I can accept Burton (even if his film is kind of terrible), glad to see Mastroianni recognized, not sure why Pacino is there but I REALLY don't know why Winkler is.
Whoa, check out the Blogger redesign! I'm surprised it's taken them this long.
Louis, what do you think of the Rebel Ridge trailer?
1. Hauer
2. Plotnikov
3. Devane
4. Bruno
5. Rey
One of Kim Jee Woon's next projects will be a psychological thriller about a man who wakes up from a coma caused by a car accident that left him paralyzed. His caretaker is his mother-in-law who neglects him due to the loss of her daughter.
He'll also reunite with Song for a Korean remake of a Bollywood movie
Thoughts?
Louis: Your 10 scariest moments in otherwise bad/ineffective horror films?
Tony:
Definitely STRONG First Blood vibes from this one, though preemptively taking the over the top action route. Could easily just be over the top and ridiculous, but maybe it will own it in the right way. Always appreciate Don Johnson as a villain at the very least.
8000's:
Certainly sounds up his alley when it comes to approach, here's hoping it goes all the way to his Devil/Bittersweet apex.
Ytrewq:
Here's five I can think of:
Zelda - Pet Sematary
The Bear - Annihilation
The Tunnel - Men
Jody - The Amityville Horror
The Fog returns one more time - The Fog
Post a Comment