Friday, 30 August 2024

Alternate Best Actor 1977: Bruno Ganz in The American Friend

Bruno Ganz did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jonathan Zimmermann in The American Friend. 

Bruno Ganz plays the "average man" who by chance runs into cinematic famous psychopath Tom Ripley (Dennis Hopper), who we meet as your average picture framer and art restorer, who unfortunately has some blood borne illness that appears to be terminal. In one of the original Breaking Bad performances, Ganz's average man is someone we meet in his way, which is already a bit more because Ganz is just a naturally interesting actor. There's just something about him that is never boring which is useful for playing a potentially "boring" part initially, because his Jonathan just seems kind of interesting even if he is definitely just average at the same time. Ganz approaches his early scenes well without any fuss, there is a quiet subtle sense of his condition in the certain underlying darkness as the man goes about his life, even if he often smiles and seems to be warm to his kid, his wife, there is the underlying sense of the man sensing his eventual death. His first action in the film is to instruct on the action of valuable artwork, and to specifically snub Hopper's Ripley, who is pawning off the work of a dead painter who is in fact alive in order to earn a greater profit. Jonathan refuses to shake Ripley's hand, which Ganz plays as very matter of fact of the man who scoffs as a man he has viewed as profit minded within this world where he clearly respects the art. Unfortunately for Jonathan this compels Ripley to finger him as a man ideal to perform assassinations, since he is dying, which he begins by spreading rumors that his illness may be worse than it is. 

Re-watching the film again shows the brilliant choice of Ganz to move from subtly to overtly shake the notion that Jonathan is a good man turned astray due to circumstances. Ganz performs this quietly in the scenes leading up to the first kill where he is asking both his personal physician, and a specialist, set up by the men who want him to perform the hit, about his condition. The scenes of the doctor have Jonathan prodding the doctor about the truth which you could take as a man needing to know the truth, or wanting to find a way out of the proposition, the specific kind of urgency Ganz portrays isn't as anxiety related to potential guilt, it's a need to support the notion of taking on the hit. Ganz presents a want for honesty, which he supports further even in the moments of being asked, where Ganz portrays surprise and disbelief however with a hint of interest that goes way beyond any kind of desperation. And while you may believe this is the innocent man turned astray, Ganz doesn't make it so simple in the story of Jonathan. Ganz is absolutely stellar in the first hit, because he doesn't portray it at all like a professional rather a man trying to be one. He labors moments of his movement, his choices are always telegraphed in the right way, because Jonathan is telegraphing themselves to himself. Ganz brings the right sense of the tension of the moment, again not so much the man facing the life or death decision but rather the fear of being caught and really even the tension of a kind of excitement as he goes about killing this man. With the key moment being after he makes his escape, Ganz's shows after the release of adrenaline a genuine exuberance of a man living as he kills. 

After the initial killings one can take it as though the man is having second thoughts as we see him wallowing in frustration, though again I don't think Ganz plays it as simply as just a basic guilt for his actions. Rather Ganz depicts more so this frustration as he attempts to sink back into his normal life, a frustration though that less reflects a sadness for losing any kind of calm, but rather being stuck away from this experience that seemingly made him live again after being stuck within that certain confined state created by the idea of his impending death. When asked for another killing, Ganz's performance again delivers the sort of semi-no's as with only enough believability of a man convincing himself that he's not a killer, but far too weak to actually not continue on as he's tasked with a more difficult killing involving several gangsters on a train. But before that, it is essential to talk about Ganz and Hopper as we see Ripley's relationship with Jonathan develop, past that opening hostility. The subsequent meetings find Ripley quietly charmed by Jonathan's devotion to his craft, even his ability to spot that something was off with the painter's new work, and beyond that initial dismissiveness, Ganz beautifully plays a quiet relent on his earlier behavior even if he explains himself. And Ganz brings such a natural sense of the quiet joy in Jonathan as Ripley speaks so highly of him, Ganz portraying not as standard ego, but rather the needed boost for a damaged ego of a man looking for someone, anyone recognizing him as more than just some dying schlub. 

Their relationship goes beyond admiration of craft as in the middle of the attempted killing on the train, Ripley joins Jonathan in his quest...and what we have is just a truly outstanding scene. The scene is just outstanding as it is thrilling, but also darkly comic at the same time. The essential ingredient to all of it however is the chemistry between Ganz and Hopper, because after the initial surprise Jonathan and Ripley become true partners. The two are wonderful in every interaction, despite being the unnatural habit of maneuvering murders in a very populated train, are so naturalistic in the way they create the tension but also share such a sense of joy in every maneuver. Both actors show that not only are the men loving it, they're specifically loving doing it together. Every moment is so much more because Ganz and Hopper accentuate every glance, every line, with such a deep sense of this very peculiar yet all too tangible camaraderie. With the finale of the scene being absolutely perfect as Ganz again brilliantly shows the true nature of this endeavor, not of desperation for money for his family as he dies, but rather a man who believes he is dying finding this outlet for living. As we see Ganz stick his head out the train car, and there is such sublime joy and exuberance of a man embracing life...even if it involves killing. Ganz and Hopper's chemistry is so fascinating because as truly bizarre as this friendship becomes, it is genuine in their way with Ganz showing the way he looks at Ripley giving him life, and Ripley in turn, oddly enough, seeing a genuine friend. 

Ganz's performance throughout the final sequence of the film conveys the strange state of the man as he goes down this dark path willingly, even when his wife finds out, Ganz's performance brilliantly underlies the truth of the situation, as Ganz doesn't present the shame of a once innocent man who has to admit to his wrongdoing, rather he reacts more so like a drug addict whose fixation has been discovered. Ganz's performance reveals the man as recognizing this as a choice to do what he has done not just for the sake of it. The whole final sequence is amazing work by Ganz as he manages to do two things, one is run with his chemistry with Hopper, where the two seem complete partners now as they play off each other, but also show the man in his dying state of mind, to the point he's quite directly losing his mind in this kind of mania. In each successive scene Ganz's reactions become that much more extreme, and even distant, the moment he starts singing the Beatles even though Ganz makes entirely natural, by funneling into granting a sense in the unnatural state of Jonathan's mind as he's dying but kind of just living out his dying breath to what he sees as the most. The role of the man Ripley manipulates to crime I think could easily be completely overshadowed, and would be in the inferior re-adaptation of Ripley's game. While Hopper's amazing and often dominates, Ganz is never lost or forgotten in their scenes together by making this choice to not turn Jonathan into some random innocent, but a man who releases his darker self on his own accord in order to embrace what he has left of his life. 

42 comments:

Jonathan Williams said...

Thoughts on the direction and screenplay.

Michael McCarthy said...

Do you still consider Hopper to be supporting?

A said...

Louis: your top 10 performances in David Lynch projects?

Tony Kim said...

A: He gave one such list here, though it's possible the list would now look different post-The Return.
https://actoroscar.blogspot.com/2015/05/alternate-best-supporting-actor-1990.html

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: What do you think of Howard Shore's score for Ed Wood?

Louis Morgan said...

Jonathan:

The screenplay by Wenders I think rather brilliantly shifts the adaptation more overtly into the story of the man being brought into Ripley's world, rather than presenting as much from Ripley's POV and more so delves into the "average man" interaction, and making Ripley's role less of a psychopath playing with a toy and rather a psychopath trying to make a friend in his deranged win actually more interesting. Of course that is all with the developments of the plot here well implemented with extra bits of business thrown in for good measure and most specifically those that show the contrasts of culture. I love the whole idea of Ripley sticking out as the "cowboy" American within the European art world. It offers a fantastic new angle and plays even further into his and Zimmermann being this odd match that Wenders somehow makes a natural pairing through a twisted situation. Making the plot play off the character development of Zimmermann and the friendship between him and Ripley. The crux being in Wenders screenplay is that he does make Zimmermann not Ripley the main character, and explores the story in a more unexpected, and I'll say, more intriguing fashion.

I always think every art house director should do a thriller at some point, just to see if they have what it takes in a certain sense, because Wenders more than proves that, which let's be honest when he's at his peak, he's one of the very best directors. This is an example of such creating such a captivating visual tapestry that places us so squarely into these various cities and locations with such a tangible sense of place, in part because of his natural sound design, but also Muller's incredible cinematography that bleeds this specific atmosphere and sense of time that is just extraordinary. And what I think you see with Wenders is his ability to really be himself while not dropping the plot. Which is to say Wenders does explore what another filmmaker probably wouldn't have, in offering those specific moments of character or place, like having Ripley walk on the overpass, he and Zimmermann casually shooting the breeze, or even the moment of Zimmermann after the first kill. BUT, as much as he places into this world and mental space with that art house sensibility, he naturally segues into thriller, though thrillers his own way. Which is particularly summarized by when he uses the score, as these fascinating specific changes of filmmaking rhythm that work exceptionally every time for me.

Michael:

Yes, though I won't contest the fact that he's definitely on the border. For me he's supporting, one because Ganz is unquestionably lead so that helps, two there's plenty of the film without Ripley, but three most importantly of all because just about every scene with Ripley, without Zimmermann, it is setting up something in relation to Zimmermann's story, even the scenes with Nicholas Ray are setting up Zimmermann's ability to identify the questionable nature of the paintings. Though Ripley's the catalyst for the story, the story's always about Zimmermann.

A:

Well with Twin Peaks:

1. Kyle MacLachlan - Twin Peaks/The Return
2. Naomi Watts - Mulholland Drive
3. Dennis Hopper - Blue Velvet
4. Richard Farnsworth - The Straight Story
5. Sheryl Lee - Twin Peaks Fire Walk With Me
6. John Hurt - The Elephant Man
7. Ray Wise - Twin Peaks
8. David Lynch - Twin Peaks/The Return
9. Miguel Ferrer - Twin Peaks/The Return
10. Isabella Rossellini - Blue Velvet

Louis Morgan said...

Robert:

I love it, though I don't include it in my personal lineup because I've never parsed out if enough of it is truly original, as at least some of it is, brilliantly, reused stock music that Ed Wood himself used, though I think it is also sometimes rearranged or riffs on that stock music as well. Regardless like so much of the film, takes a schlocky element of those films, doesn't lose the basic qualities of them, yet somehow makes them suddenly wholly appealing.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Would you say that watching Siskel & Ebert is what helped you start thinking about films critically, and what are some of the most valuable things you learned from them about analyzing cinema?

And on the subject of Ebert, how do you feel about his position that films are like "a machine that generates empathy"?

Matt Mustin said...

Great performance in a great film. Hopper is amazing, of course, but the film wouldn't work without Ganz.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

Yes to a degree most certainly and maybe just partly the idea of defending your position passionately whether you liked or disliked a film. And even if both didn't always listen to themselves in this regard, the idea of examining a film on its own merits by what it is specifically trying to accomplish rather than reviewing the film its not. Keeping in mind Ebert's idea of it's not what a film's about, it's *how* the film is about it. And just really having one's perspective on film and being willing to disagree.

I would agree with the statement, as film specifically allows us to see another's perspective, culture and life, in both what a given film is depicting but also getting to understand the viewpoint of the filmmakers.

Louis Morgan said...

I will also now be pausing on 77, to rewatch Beetlejuice and then do my 2024 catchup.

Luke Higham said...


Napoleon (Director's Cut)
Inside Out 2
Evil Does Not Exist
The Beast
Monkey Man
The First Omen (Please Watch)
The Dead Don't Hurt
The Substance
Sometimes I Think About Dying
Civil War
I Saw The TV Glow
Young Woman And The Sea
Ghostlight
We Grown Now
Fancy Dance
Janet Planet
Wicked Little Letters
Woman Of The Hour
Orion And The Dark
The Book Of Clarence
Problemista
LaRoy, Texas
Spaceman
Cabrini
Abigail
Shirley
His Three Daughters
The Last Stop In Yuma County
Firebrand
The Beautiful Game
Scoop
Bad Boys: Ride Or Die
Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
Godzilla × Kong: The New Empire
Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 2
Ultraman: Rising
The Secret Art Of Human Flight
National Anthem
The Instigators

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Have you watched the Netflix miniseries Ripley with Andrew Scott? What’s your ranking of the best performances by actors who played Tom Ripley?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: As part of your 2024 catch-up, could you make time for Laapataa Ladies?

Anonymous said...

Luke, Louis has already seen Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I forgot to take it off because I made the list a couple months ago expecting him to do the roundup later on next month. I did have Didi, Deadpool and Wolverine etc., on the list before taking them off for that previous post.

Luke Higham said...

It appears that Ralph Fiennes' 28 year nomination drought could be coming to an end at last and potentially even win.

RatedRStar said...

Louis: To be fair as a 1977 fan lol, you have pretty much finished most of 1977, just Hauer, Plotnikov and I suppose The Last Wave, simply because its by the underrated Peter Weir with a potentially solid Chamberlain leading.

RatedRStar said...

Louis: Thank you so much by the way, I have mentioned often how 1977 is my most anticipated year due to it being a bit of a hidden gem year, so thanks for covering basically everything.

Luke Higham said...

RatedRStar: There's about another 15 to 17 films including rewatches that I would like him to see before finishing.

RatedRStar said...

Luke: From 1977, which films?

Luke Higham said...

Along with the 3 you've mentioned:
Jesus Of Nazareth
The Duellists
The Goodbye Girl
Sorcerer
Annie Hall
Providence
Wizards
Pete's Dragon
The Lacemaker (could be a great Huppert performance)
Sleeping Dogs (early breakthrough role for Sam Neill)
House
Jabberwocky
The Hunters
Peppermint Soda
The Report
Padre Padrone
Between The Lines
The Man Who Loved Women
Islands In The Stream

Make that 19.

RatedRStar said...

Luke: Fair enough.. I am very much on the Richard Dreyfuss..Goodbye Girl train.

RatedRStar said...

I actually saw the Jesus of Nazareth star Robert Powell in an old sitcom called The Detectives with British comedian Jasper Carrott, actually very entertaining, Robert Powell can do comedy lol.

Emi Grant said...

Luke: A little out of the loop atm, what film are you talking about in regards to Fiennes?

Tony Kim said...

Emi: Not Luke, but I'm quite sure he's referring to Conclave.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Do you generally agree with Ebert's "No good movie is too long, and no bad movie is short enough" maxim?

Emi Grant said...

Tony: Got it. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Is MachLachlan in Twin Peaks, your most favorite TV performance of all time, now??

Anonymous said...

Louis: Is MachLachlan in Twin Peaks, your most favorite TV performance of all time, now??

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the rain sequence in Rear Window. I think what's impressive is how the art department constructed a drainage system, just for that scene.

Really, one of the best things about the massive courtyard set in the movie is how it feels like a character.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Would the 8th of September be the right time to give your latest Oscar predictions.

Matt Mustin said...

I saw a review of Conclave where the words "career-best" were applied to Fiennes' performance. I'll wait and see, but I don't know, man. That's some career.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this brief snippet from this Steven Spielberg interview by James Lipton about Close Encounters of the Third Kind?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZspOEa1CP4A

Louis Morgan said...

Shaggy:

Haven't seen it, but will probably check it out at some point.

Otherwise:

1. Dennis Hopper
2. Alain Delon
3. John Malkovich
4. Matt Damon

Tahmeed:

Sure.

Anonymous:

No, but #3 isn't too shabby.

Tony:

I agree figuratively but not literally. To explain, I do think length does not inherently dictate a quality of a film, which I think is the point of the quote. And I agree no bad film is too short, as watching certain 90 minute bad films feels far longer than watching JFK, The Godfather, Lawrence of Arabia and so forth. And a great film can be very long, but taking the quote literally a film does have to earn his length...and that's where I do disagree with the quote. In that pacing is important and sometimes a great film is made to a degree by what it cuts. Amadeus's so-called director's cut, is too long, and that's my favorite film of all time. Because what the perfect theatrical cut removed, were the not great parts of the film.

8000's:

Kind of a flex on Hitchcock/the art department's part, by taking the next step into the reality crafted by the neighborhood by making the environment aspect also as real, and great bits of business fumbling to get inside, which isn't essential to the plot however does make the film that much better.

Luke:

I mean theoretically waiting for the TIFF audience award would make the most sense.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

I have always loved that clip, and is a great observation by Lipton in cutting to the core Spielberg in a way Spielberg didn't even realize. And I love the way Spielberg lights up with the question as he too kind of discovers the subconscious choice to have his parents communicating reflected in his film, without him even intending to do that.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: what are your thoughts on Tokuma Nishioka, Tommy Bastow and Takehiro Hira in Shogun?

Tony Kim said...

Louis: What do you think of these actors as Paul Hunham?

Nathan Lane
Tony Shalhoub
Donald Sutherland
Edward G. Robinson
Charles Laughton

Tony Kim said...

Louis: "Amadeus's so-called director's cut, is too long, and that's my favorite film of all time. Because what the perfect theatrical cut removed, were the not great parts of the film."

So... in a sense... would you say the director's cut had "too many notes"?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this scene

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6-rW6SGQmUk

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on these South Park episodes?

More Crap
Go God Go Part 1 and 2
Tsst

Louis Morgan said...

Lucas:

Nishioka - (Brings the right sort of seasoned gravitas of the impeccably loyal right hand man who just stands with his #1 at every point. There's a calmness in his work and the right sort of presence of a man who is firm in his belief in his belief when he doesn't have any idea for the actual plan he just knows there will be one. Although I will say what happens with his character is an adaptation change I don't entirely understand the inclusion of, regardless, he delivers a terrific portrayal of the scene in managing to play both layers of the false yet convincing layer of the suicidal frustration just above the most sincere of all commitments just beneath it.)

Bastow - (One of the big changes in character from the two versions as Thomas is a force to be reckoned with on his own accord where Bastown is more of a quiet nearly pitiable man, firm in his belief but weak in his manner, where Thomas was strong in both. Bastow's approach does work, even if it perhaps leaves less of an impact, by always emphasizing the faith of the character as a desperate constant, desperate because it so often conflicts with the rest of his church leaders who are far more active in their intention.)

Hira - (Personally wouldn't have been my number 2 choice after Asano for the Emmy nod, but he definitely delivers a good performance. His performance though is purposefully limited to an extent in playing the calculating villain in contrast to Sanada. What Hira's work does is show this sort of similar kind of intelligence behind but a more inherently nefarious demeanor as the man within the choices. His performance doesn't have that much variation but he certainly works as this kind of menacing "stone" that our characters have to work against.)

Tony:

Lane would be a bit softer I think as his baseline but certainly could deliver on a similar kind of beaten down pathos.

Shalhoub actually has similar innate comedic energy to Giamatti so it's fairly easy to see him working the role.

Sutherland would actually be even pricklier but maybe hit even harder in the dramatic moments because of it, and could do the comedy as well.

Robinson seems ideal honestly as he certainly could do well as the sad sack but had an innately powerful personality.

Laughton would be fascinating, though I'm not sure exactly what his approach would've been.

Precisely.

Anonymous:

Actually don't care for the scene, one because it's built from the concept of "jerkass" Homer, which I've always hated so him just being cruel for no reason having this moment isn't the same as in the emotions in the single episode of Secrets of A Successful Marriage which the scene references with the posies. However that one you saw how Homer's naive choices led to his mistakes to make his attempt to return moving unlike his just mean for the sake of it of later Homer. Also I hated that they used that take for Kavner, which was a preview for her vocal deterioration that would be prevalent in the later episodes. To me it just sounds like her voice is as coarse as possible from too many takes, and honestly takes me out of the film....which I was not particularly invested in to begin with.

Anonymous:

More Crap is one where it is dragging out two jokes too long, though I do like the Emmy winner running joke, and the idea of ripping off King of Kong, however takes far too long.

Go God Go is great as it takes such a child perspective beautifully in starting with just a kid not wanting to wait for a new game console and taking to a Cartman extreme, then that goes to the hilarious extreme of ending the Buck Rodgers universe, that they actually fill out quite nicely to lead to such a fantastic climax with Cartman desperately making the phone calls and hating himself as he keeps getting in his own way.

Tsst is also a hilarious, single joke that gets so much mileage out and I love that Cesar Milan is one of the characters they don't make fun of and instead just respect him so much that he's only this awesome force that is the one man that can defeat Cartman.