Wednesday, 18 March 2026

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2004: Bud Cort in The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou

Bud Cort did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Bill Ubell in The Life Aquatic With Zissou. 

Since I had a few different options of who to cover for the last couple spots, thought I’d devote one them to give some time to Bud Cort, an actor who made a name for himself as the unorthodox leading man in the very early seventies, before working as a character actor for the rest of his career. A highlight of this section being his work here with Wes Anderson’s large trope of performers. Cort playing a role that in most films would not be of note and even more so the performer certainly wouldn’t be someone who deserves much mention. Cort specifically playing Bill Ubell the Bond company stooge that Steve Zissou (Bill Murray) must take on his new expedition in order to ensure funding for the trip. Cort’s first relatively short scene being one of my favorites in any Wes Anderson film, where Steve and Steve’s possible son Ned (Owen Wilson) just learned of Bill’s required presence and Steve instantly badgers Bill about not badgering him. Cort’s turn of curiosity has this perfect innocence to it, as does his follow up question “Why would I do that?” asked with genuine conviction. To which Steve notes him being a Bond company stooge, Cort’s reaction is both hilarious yet also genuinely moving as he so earnestly notes that he may be a bond company stooge but he’s also a human being, followed by just the perfect hangdog expression. Only made all the better when Steve apologizes and Cort’s face brightens so sincerely as being part of the time, right down to his eagerness to join hands with Steve and Ned. It’s a quick bit but honestly ideal character actor work where Cort makes it all so memorable so quickly, funny but also giving us a real sense of this character. 

Cort afterwards being part of the crew sort of where he manages to portray genuine enthusiasm in moments, with also a combination of some mild confusion, even worried concern when witnessing Steve’s decision to steal equipment from his rival. Cort brings an enjoyable directness about everything he does, including when the boat is invaded by pirates and Bill, being able to speak Filipino, negotiates with pirates. Cort’s practical manner is what is so great where he’s just direct with every line and so pure about it. Particularly the moment where the pirates take him as a hostage instead, and Cort’s “aw shucks” combined with a bit of “I guess I’ll go with it” is just great. As is his hostage call to the crew, where Cort’s whole delivery is so brilliantly matter of fact as just a practical business guy, nothing special including the kidnapping. I especially love the moment when Steve and crew are rescuing Bill, where Bill stops Steve from attacking one of the locals, where Cort’s bright smile and delivery of “he’s a friend” again paints immediately the sense of refuge in his situation and again reinforcing the funny but also heartwarming sincerity of his character. Something that manages to even extend when Bill is completely part of the crew even emphatically telling the man they stole equipment from that they stole it. Cort’s performance in the moment even sells the embracing of the chaos as even when admitting to stealing it is still of the utmost earnestness in showing Bill just as a guy who believes, even as a bond company stooge. Completing his arc of sorts in a way that is convincing and created just by his little bits throughout that are mostly funny, but there is something especially endearing out of Bill’s journey through Cort’s performance. A wonderful show of a character actor’s talent, because Cort’s not trying to steal the film, or steer it away from its course, he’s just elevating every moment he has and elevating the film that much more by giving real life to largely a bit part. And showing that while Bill may be a bit part, he can also be a human being. 

47 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Since you've started with the bottom lineup, could you leave O'Toole to the end. I hope you'll devote some time to Bana as well.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: You accidentally wrote 2025 instead of 2004 on the header.

Harris Marlowe said...

Louis: Could you watch Incident at Loch Ness for this round? Underrated, hilarious film with Werner Herzog.

Anonymous said...

Louis, could you add Costume Design to the sidebar.

Anonymous said...

Luke, what are your greatest hopes for 2026.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous:
John Malkovich finally getting a five.
Werwulf being as great if not greater than Nosferatu.
John Goodman and Steve Buscemi getting their first Oscar nominations.

Tybalt said...

Louis: Did you ever seriously intend to rewatch The Piano at any point before the Oscars? I don't mean to sound petulant, but I find it disappointing that you decided not to despite making the time to see extra 2025 titles.

Luke Higham said...

Tybalt: Maybe ask him to do it as a Birthday recommendation.

Luke Higham said...

His bonus round schedule is gonna be lighter than usual after 2004 is finished.

Calvin Law said...

No offence intended guys, but Louis should be able to watch whatever he wants to watch in his own time.

Robert MacFarlane said...

The Piano rewatch was my initial request, but then I changed my mind to the 1991 Into the Woods proshot. So complain to me, not him.

Tybalt said...

Calvin: Of course he's allowed to do that. And I understand if he had other commitments, I was simply asking because at one point it seemed like he was holding off on it until the end, so I was concerned if he had genuinely forgotten about it.

Matt Mustin said...

I gotta watch this film again, because it's great, but I thought Cort was good but didn't really stand out

Tony Kim said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Tony Kim said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Harris Marlowe said...

Tim Schultze: Could I get your thoughts on the Scrubs episodes My Own American Girl and My Life in Four Cameras?

Kevin said...

1. Pacino
2. O'Toole
3. Nolte
4. Hurt
5. Thornton

1. Molina
2. Cort
3. Bright
4. Meadows
5. Wu

Shaggy Rogers said...

1. Pacino
2. Nolte
3. O'Toole
4. Hurt
5. Thornton

1. Molina
2. Bright
3. Cort
4. Meadows
5. Wu

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

1. Pacino
2. O'Toole
3. Nolte
4. Thornton
5. Hurt

1. Molina
2. Bright
3. Cort
4. Meadows
5. Wu

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Are you watching The Immortal Man tomorrow.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

For some reason I can't see my predictions under previous post, so as a precaution...

1. Pacino
2. O'Toole
3. Nolte
4. Thornton
5. Hurt

1. Molina
2. Bright
3. Cort
4. Meadows
5. Wu

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: Your opinion on the trailer for Wild Horse Nine?

Perfectionist said...

1. Pacino
2. Nolte
3. O'Toole
4. Thornton
5. Hurt

1. Molina
2. Bright
3. Cort
4. Meadows
5. Wu

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Probably if I have the time.

Ytrewq:

Loved it expectedly, great little bits of dialogue already in there and Malkovich speaking McDonagh looks most promising. Although interesting with an In Bruges starting point, which not a criticism, though with potentially quite the alternative end points given the setting and nature of these different sort of hit men. Looking forward to it, not that I needed to say that.

Tony Kim said...

Louis: Thoughts on these scenes?

If I Had Legs... - Hamster
The Naked Gun - Snowman

Tim said...

Harris:

My Own American Girl:
What can i say? It's just funny. "No, the cook died!"; "... he currently resides in the Portland subway system"; "MY MACHINES!"(side note: that's goddamn Pintel from POTC!); the entire car door running gag (which is GOLD).
Beyond that though, i respect the fact that Elliot's arc is actually really consequential. There is a gigantic difference between the seemingly confident but lonely woman from Season 1 and the bossy control freak who's still oddly likable from the later seasons, all found here in this quick but still hella effective arc. And "Time spend wishing is time wasted" is truly inspired advice.
Really good needle drop at the end, i think i heard that in a movie once


My Life in four Cameras:
LOVE. IT.
This is the exact right way to make fun of sitcom cliches. From the overdone plot to the sterile fake set to the oddly specific prize money. Not to mention it's actually really really funny, and has a really good rendition of "Isn't she lovely?" to boot. Of course the Janitor knows everybody's stories. And i quote Turk's arm wrestling warrior scream all the time when i'm playing pool.

We have had many episodes that talk about how JD wishes life was easier and happier, and about how the real routine in a hospital is a lot sadder and more dramatic. Hell, in a way that's the show's entire thesis. And i love how it always avoids easy answers and forced plot resolutions. And man, after spending half the episode in sitcom mode, having the entire downer ending happen within the last 30 seconds hits so much harder.

Tim said...

thoughts on the trailer for "Pressure"?

Harris Marlowe said...

Tim: How would you rank the seasons of Scrubs? And thoughts on McGinley's performance?

Matt Mustin said...

Clockers cast ratings, for anyone interested:
Phifer-4.5
Keitel-4.5
Lindo-4.5
Turturro-3
Washington-3.5
Love-3.5
David-3.5
Byrd-4
Taylor-3
Imperioli-3

Robert MacFarlane said...

Louis: Who would you say were some of the most disappointing/boring actors and actresses of the Golden Age? Extra points if you don’t include performers who later gave good or great performances post-Golden Age.

Anonymous said...

Louis: if The Brutalist had been released in 2025 instead 2024 and Sinners in 2024 instead of 2025 ... do you believe Jordan would have won over Chalamet/Domingo/Fiennes/Stan? And do you believe Brody would have won over Chalamet/DiCaprio/Hawke/Moura?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Anonymous: I think with Brody out of the '24 race, Domingo probably has a much better chance, although the way Sing Sing's campaign was fumbled is still unbelievable to me.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: Which post-2000 roles do you think would've been a good fit for Val Kilmer? Or in general, which other actor's career do you think he would've thrived in?

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: Have you been watching the second season of The Pitt?

Lucas Saavedra said...

1. Pacino
2. O'Toole
3. Nolte
4. Hurt
5. Thornton

1. Molina
2. Cort
3. Bright
4. Meadows
5. Wu

RatedRStar said...

RIP Chuck Norris.

Shaggy Rogers said...

RIP Chuck Norris

Luke Higham said...

RIP Chuck Norris

Maciej said...

RIP Chuck Norris

Kevin said...

RIP Chuck Norris

Kevin said...

Also, just watched Project Hail Mary, I genuinely hope this becomes another smashing box office success for Ryan Gosling. No spoilers, but as a huge fan of the book, this is quite a faithful adaptation that really captures its sincerity and sheer charm. Gosling is in prime PRIME form, might just be his most accessible and winningest performance, that still demonstrates his tremendous ability to be emotionally vulnerable. If Damon secured an Oscar nom for The Martian, Gosling really should be amongst the 5 nominees next year (and im saying this sincerely as a fan of Damon's work in The Martian). And please do see this in IMAX

Cast ratings:
Gosling - 5
Huller - 4
Ortiz - 4/4.5
Boyce - 3

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Cast and director for a 2020's A Place in the Sun?

J96 said...

Dang! RIP Chuck Norris.

Louis Morgan said...

Tony:

The Bronstein clearly love their anxiety moments and being able to find that sort of very specific ridden tension moments, in this case with dealing with the hamster, where it becomes more so a demonic creature, with the design there being just slightly twisted as such, with the constant noise of the daughter’s changing moods, then the fender bender, then ideal annoyed guy Josh Pais showing up, to the most horrible outcome possible as just the one thing after another build up of that initial pressure.

The Snowman is one of those bits where you don’t expect it from the first moment of possession, then to the sudden sexual escapades, to the rejected third wheel, to the horror movie suddenly, to the comical “romantic” over the top death. Hilarious as something you had no idea was going to be in the movie, has no reason to be in the movie, yet is perfect in every way.

Robert:

Chester Morris
Anne Revere
Joan Bennett
Victor Mature

Anonymous:

I feel Chalamet would’ve won last year via boring biopic logic, and people hadn’t turned on him to the extent we’ve seen recently. After all, A Complete Unknown did amazing in the nominations so there was plenty of love, and a traditional win route seemed open to exploit.

Brody I think wins this year too, as if they really wanted to give DiCaprio win #2 instead they had the avenue this year given the film was winning best picture, Moura and Hawke I think the nomination were their victories, and Chalamet wasn’t as strong (voting wise) as it seemed given the BAFTA loss.

Lucas:

Not at the moment but I probably will at some point.

Tahmeed:

A Place In The Sun 2020’s directed by Luca Guadagnino:

George Eastman: Jacob Elordi
Angela Vickers: Anya Taylor-Joy
Alice Trip: Odessa A’Zion
Hannah Eastman: Naomi Watts

Ytrewq:

A much better version of Gabriel in Mission Impossible.
Cliff Booth
Chief Willoughby
John Ruth
Ron Woodroof

I don’t think he could’ve pushed himself up to Cruise or Pitt position, but I think he could’ve found himself a place closer to Kurt Russell, Woody Harrelson or Matthew McConaughey.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: What do you think the final Oscar tallies/vote rankings for Lead Actor would have looked like in 1974 and 1975?

Luke Higham said...

I'm a bit surprised Wallace Beery didn't make the list.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

74:

2. Jack Nicholson - Chinatown
3. Al Pacino - The Godfather Part II
4. Dustin Hoffman - Lenny
5. Albert Finney - Murder on the Orient Express

I do think Nicholson was probably #2 given he won the drama Globe, later the BAFTA and the Oscar the following year. He also seemed far more into winning than his three non-Carney competitors, as it was clear he wanted it. Leaving the other three, Pacino maybe third in the best picture, though Michael being so cold a character I could believe he was lower and Pacino being so taciturn about the awards at that time. Hoffman had a similar but perhaps more aggressive attitude playing a controversial person, and Finney didn't seem to care at all...though that didn't stop them from rewarding Glenda Jackson.

1975:

I will preface in that I think Nicholson probably had a super majority.

2. Walter Matthau
3. Al Pacino
4. Maximilian Schell
5. James Whitmore

Yes the nightmare scenario for #2, just as he won the Globe, and his co-star won. Yes best picture nominee, yes BAFTA rewarded Pacino technically, but they were a very different beast at that time. And the nature of Pacino's openly gay part, I'm not sure the full academy of that time would've embraced. Then Schell and Whitmore were in the tiniest of films, so I think the nomination was the reward for each.

Luke:

Beery was bad, but I don't think "Boring" would be the best description for him.