Daniel Wu did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Joe Kwan in New Police Story.
New Police Story follows a superstar police officer Chan (Jackie Chan) as he faces off against a team of young criminals.
Daniel Wu plays Joe Kwan, the head of those criminals who solely exist to pester Officer Chan, and appear early on as a masked crew who entrap Chan’s fellow officers, putting them in a death trap then forcing Chan to play various games of skill unless they kill the officers. Wu is the figurehead of this group and essentially plays the part as very much the smug snake. There isn’t too much complication early on as he just smiles with a casual disgust for Chan and in every delivery basically pronouncing his own greatness compared to Chan, as he kills those officers with only a bit of joy and certainly without any hesitation. He certainly is one of the villains that exist in an action movie.
This sends Chan down a spiral, only becomes reinvigorated when a young police officer Frank (Nicholas Tse), who also reinvigorates the movie by being the best part of the film, through his easy going charisma, natural humor he finds throughout but also very much delivering on the stakes even when his co-stars aren’t quite as convincing. Tse’s simple fun to watch in bringing that endearing energy through every scene he is, including the action scenes where he's sort of more surprised though trying to go with the flow demeanor just adds to each and every one. Although this is common for Tse, and by that I mean I seem to be often reviewing a different performance from a Hong Kong film where Nicholas Tse is the best part. Back to the requested performance, Wu on the other hand I don’t find particularly or endearing or menacing, as we learn his character is the privileged, screw up son of the chief of police. An element that doesn’t exactly make him more menacing or sympathetic for the most part. Rather as Wu played the note of smugness as the villain, as the son he presents a very generalized fed up rebellion and not much more. We proceed then to follow the heroes, who become a bit more interesting thanks to the efforts of Tse. He brings a bit of wily conviction as we learn he’s a fake policeman who pretended to be one to avenge his family against the gang. An element Tse does what he can with and again makes for the one character I actually care about fully in the film.
This eventually leads to some fights between the sides, where we mostly get Wu doing his best, I’m smelling something face, followed by that overly satisfied smile as he gets away. Pretty much rinse and repeat until the final confrontation, where he and Chan play one more game of put together the gun and shoot it. That’s where Wu is at his best because the loss of that smug face as he sees Chan will win, is a more than decent moment. Followed by Joe choosing to get killed by the cops then turn himself in to his own father. Wu is good to bad in this moment, as his initial reaction of anguish at this realization of his humiliation and there is some sense of the years of that relationship with his father. Then he falls into just some emotional mugging and becomes considerably less good by the end of it. Leaving this to be a not particularly impactful villainous turn in any way. Tse on the other hand makes for a strong surprising sidekick who quite frankly steals the film from Chan, to the point you wish he had more to work with, more to do as what only holds him back is the film is only kind of interested in his character.


47 comments:
Louis: Your rating for Tse.
Louis: I mean I requested this performance...ten years ago I think, and I think I said not long after that it was probably a mistake to choose Wu but I stuck to the decision in the end.
It is funny that Nicholas Tse during the 2000s was ignored by the awards bodies because Daniel Wu like Nick Cheung for Beast Stalker was the one getting the awards attention.
I think it might be because Wu was being groomed to be like the next leading man in HK cinema in the Louis Koo/Aaron Kwok vein, whereas Nicholas Tse still had that bad boy singer image which he would eventually shake off.
Thoughts on Chan and any other cast members of note?
Honestly the film’s implied premise of ‘what if goofy Jackie Chan cop but going through a serious dark story’ seems pretty promising but the execution is indeed, lacking (and Chan is not good enough an actor to pull it off). Wu isn’t awful but I agree with this review entirely - and Tse really should’ve been the central driving force of the film.
Louis: your casts and directors for a 2010’s and 2020’s version of Ravenous
Also completely agree with your Orion Lee comments on the previous post. From my somewhat limited game tape of him, I’ve found his voice in particular to be a most excellent asset and more directors would definitely benefit from having him in films.
Rest In Peace Valerie Perrine.
I feel like the decline of Hong Kong Cinema really became a thing in the mid 2000s and that can be attributed to many things, one of those things being the lack of fresh leading men that were under the age of 35 that could continue the great work of the actors that carried the 80s/90s boom, instead having to rely on the same actors from those previous decades.
Lucas: I mean, I already asked him that.
RatedRStar: I'm curious, how did your interest in Hong Kong cinema begin?
Louis: For historical/biopic films, to what degree do you prioritize accuracy of depiction compared to changes for dramatic adaptation? Are there any examples of changes that you think were not necessary or was questionable?
Harris: I missed that, sorry
Louis: Your #6 - #10 for Director in 2004.
My god, the new Peaky Blinders film I thought was just awful. Besides Cillian being good as expected, kind of a disaster on all levels (honestly found it worse, or perhaps even more detrimental than Many Saints of Newark). That 'Who tha fook is Thomas Shelby' scene felt like ChatGPT fan fiction.
Louis: Your opinion on the following alternate casts?
2020s Planet of the Apes directed by David Twohy:
George Taylor: Chris Evans
Dr. Cornelius: Nicholas Hoult
Dr. Zira: Anne Hathaway
Dr. Zaius: Alfred Molina
2000s Harry and Tonto directed by Todd Stephens:
Harry Coombes: Henry Winkler
Shirley Mallard: Cate Blanchett
Eddie Coombes: Hank Azaria
Ginger: Mae Whitman
2000s The Cowboys directed by Clint Eastwood:
Wil Andersen: Clint Eastwood
Jebediah Nightlinger: Keith David
Asa Watts: Sam Rockwell
Kate Collingwood: Karen Allen
Cimarron: Gabriel Luna
(also in this version Watts doing the unthinkable results in Rockwell missing out on potential nominations for TAOJJBTCRF and Snow Angels)
Tony Kim: I believe it originally started in the early 2000s, my local Blockbuster at the time used to have lots of HK films from the 90s, and I just gelled with it, I mean I used to the cover the HK film awards quite frequently on this blog, even making predictions but I stopped after the 2019 ceremony, made sense I think to end it there.
Luke:
4
Harris:
Chan - 2.5(I’ll give him credit for definitely trying but the problem is he goes basically all in on the note without much nuance to it. He’s either doing the goofy, typically more charming, Chan physical routine or we get him trying to be dramatic where he brings basically the same sad face to every moment he’s trying that. He’s not atrocious but he’s just not particularly good and this is not a successful stretch of range by any means.)
Yeung - 2(One note and wholly dull love interest.)
Choi - 3(Enjoyed her off-beat energy and a duo of her and Tse probably would’ve been my preferred setup. She’s fun when she gets to do something, particularly when she helps towards the end in just bringing the right slightly chaotic silly energy that works but sadly she is given too much to do.)
Anonymous:
Ravenous 2010’s directed by Kim Jee-Woon
Captain Boyd: Lee Byung-hun
Ives: Choi Min-sik
Toffler: Choi Woo-shik
Hart: Cho Jin-woong
Major Knox: Kim Roi-ha
Reich: Kim Byeong-Ok
Ravenous 2020’s directed by Robert Eggers:
Captain Boyd: Nicholas Hoult
Ives: Robert Pattinson
Toffler: Ewan Mitchell
Hart: Willem Dafoe
Major Knox: Ralph Ineson
Reich: Joe Alwyn
George: Nathaniel Arcand
Martha: Lily Gladstone
Marcus:
I have no priority, the simple question always is “does it work?”. As there are great extremely accurate films (Oppenheimer, Gettysburg, The Assassination of Jesse James) there are great extremely inaccurate films (Amadeus, JFK, Braveheart). And I mean that extends right down to PD and costumes, as long as you make it work in 99% of cases.
1% I do think if you’re going to do an inaccurate character assassination, particularly for people who are still alive or have living close relatives, like having William Murdoch take a bribe in Titanic, just change the name to a composite character then.
But here are some baffling ones:
Bohemian Rhapsody - (There’s so many genuinely interesting stories why make it so bland…oh yeah to make nearly a billion dollars.)
Pearl Harbor - (Again you make a brilliant tapestry of different real stories to instead make it the phoniest fake love story and to barely even cover great true stories like Doris Miller is simply baffling.)
Napoleon - (Just the whole take on Napoleon not only is inaccurate makes no sense as to why he’d come to power with their depiction of him.)
Cinderella Man - (Making Max Baer a psychopath is just stupid, poverty was more than enough of a villain for Braddock.)
There’s also the kind of “I know this is dramatized as this point but now it is one step too fake”. For example don’t mind making the running clock at the end of Argo but the literal about to shoot the plane wheels was just ridiculous, same with A Taxi Driver, where again making the escape tense makes sense but they again up the ante to the point you know it is fake.
Calvin:
Yeah I was far too kind as I’ve had so many “wait a minutes” about that film since watching it, my “favorite” might be
Ada: “your son is fighting in Africa” Tommy: “Who?”
Shaggy:
6. Edgar Wright - Shaun of the Dead
7. Sam Raimi - Spider-man 2
8. Shane Meadows - Dead Man’s Shoes
9. Hirokazu Kore-eda - Nobody Knows
10. Quentin Tarantino - Kill Bill Vol. 2
Ytrewq:
Not sure about Twohy but Evans could be a fit for the Heston type, Hoult certainly would give it all, Hathaway would probably be fine and Molina could be interesting.
Mainly about Winkler’s casting which I’d say that could be a great fit and stretch his range in the right way.
Perfect for Cowboys across the board, I can basically see older Eastwood laying hands on Rockwell and then Rockwell doing the ideal sniveling reaction.
Ready Or Not 2 is very much more of the same just bigger, however there is enough entertainment to be found from the carnage, enough variations on the bloodshed as well as "we hate everyone" family dynamics, to sustain it along with Weaving still making for a compelling lead. Though I will the attempted heart of the sister relationship felt very repetitive, though it doesn't help that I'm still failing to *get* Kathryn Newton.
Weaving - 4
Newton - 2.5
Gellar - 3.5
Hatosy - 3.5
Cronenberg - 3
Wood - 3.5
Carbonell - 3.5
Durand - 3
Ceng - 2.5
Saranga - 3.5
Jae - 3.5
Beirne - 3
Louis: Your thoughts on the cast?
Louis, your thoughts on the teaser for HBO's Harry Potter series? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kt8906WXFs
Lucas:
Weaving - (Essentially a continuation of the performance though with a bit more exasperation. She remains endearing though in bringing that dogged determination throughout and managing to find a naturalistic sense of humor of the continued lack of belief that the situation could be so insane. Also does her best to make you care about the relationship with Newton just by investing in a combination of concern with also disbelief in granting a sense of a complicated history.)
Newton - (Speaking of, I don't think she really makes much of an impact other than seeming slightly out of scenes, and not in a way that works as a sane bystander sort of way either. This is particularly imperfect when we get to the scenes she shares with Weaving where she just doesn’t really find any honest dramatic heft.)
Gellar - (Brings enough of a smug satisfaction with the right cutting manner as the dominant sister. That is until her final scene where she is good at breaking that even if the specifics of the scene don’t fully add up in terms of character motivation, I did like the way she delivered it.)
Hatosy - (An effective villain performance as essentially through each step he progressively becomes less of a joke and you get a greater sense of a genuine menace within the character’s psychopathy. Hatsoy builds towards this well, delivering on becoming much more a threat convincingly than as he begins.)
Cronenberg - (Doesn’t really do too much but delivers well enough portraying basically the bored billionaire.)
Wood - (Brings mostly a detached sort of manner of the officiant, yet manages to find some effective variations in the moments where he suggests the danger of the situation if the rules are broken, and later on in a few of his reactions as someone who is the referee and isn’t in the actual game.)
Carbonell - (Brings a completely goofy energy that does work as someone trying really hard but failing miserably.)
Durand - (Quick bit but delivers on the quick menace he needs.)
Ceng - (Doesn’t really make you think she’s going to be more than a plot point which is all she is.)
Saranga - (Found his reactions pretty amusing throughout in playing up just the completely out of really wanting to be in the situation at any point and reacting with that consistent want to defer. Although I think he balances that effectively in certain moments in showing maybe the most humanity out of the villains particularly in the reaction to the death of his relative.)
Jae - (Found her intensity pretty amusing in playing up the specific jealous viciousness and worked particularly well with Weaving in creating the comedic moments of their scenes together.)
Beirne - (Basically doing a rendition of Cousin Greg, which is amusing enough.)
Anonymous:
Looks like if you made Harry Potter in the 2020's.
Guys, I’m *begging* y’all not to watch the new Harry Potter series. Regardless of how much “involvement” she has in the series, if it is successful, Rowling profit from it, and she will use those profits to hurt queer people. She’s done it before and she’ll do it again.
What Michael said.
Michael: Amen to that.
Michael: Fully agree with you man. Differences of opinion are fine when it comes to preferences in art, but not when it comes to situations like this.
Michael: I can guarantee you I'm not throwing a single cent her way. She's a disgusting, hateful person.
What Michael said. Just stick to fanfics if you need a HP fix. They’re free, not lining her pockets, and you’ll accidentally stumble into something better than canon 20% of the time.
Michael: Fortunately nobody here seemed all that hyped or interested in it before and I hope it stays this way. That bitch having more money than Midas and using it to terrorize people who already have it tough in life is next level vile.
Michael: Agreed
Did anybody see Saturday Night Live UK? It got a lot of hatred from people before it was broadcast but apparently it was OK.
Robert: lol, the amount of HP fan fiction is insane; I'm ashamed to admit how much of it I enjoy…
But, yeah, I fully agree with Michael's point.
Louis: Thoughts on the End Of Oak Street trailer
Luke:
Looks like a potentially fun and intriguing premise, though the trailer didn't really sell me beyond that, and found that split diopter shot very distracting for the trailer...hopefully it works in the film.
Michael: Hear, hear.
Every adult involved in that series and any further projects that enrich Rowling should be ashamed.
RatedRStar: What were the specific HK films you first saw that ignited your passion? And if it's not too painful to rank, what are your top 10 Hong Kong films?
1. Pacino
2. O’Toole
3. Nolte
4. Thornton
5. Hurt
Louis: could you watch these movies before you finish 2004?
-To Take a Wife (first movie of the trilogy that ended with Gett: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem, Elkabetz is even better in this movie imo)
-Or (My Treasure) (another great performance by Elkabetz, this time in a supporting role)
-A Moment to Remember (for Son Ye-jin)
Omar: I'm afraid you can't make predictions after the second review.
Omar:
I shall try.
Harris:
He can for that lineup because I've only reviewed Pacino so far.
OK, if it's not too late to change predictions for that lineup, I'll go:
1. Pacino
2. Nolte
3. O'Toole
4. Hurt
5. Thornton
1. Pacino
2. O’Toole
3. Nolte
4. Thornton
5. Hurt
Co-sign everything Michael said regarding JKR. What a horrid individual.
Louis: If/when you've caught up on Wonder Man, could I get thoughts on the leads, and the show overall?
Guys, your rating for Ryan Gosling in Project Hail Mary?
Tony Kim: To be honest there were so many that didn't have an English label on them at the time, they were like hidden in the corner of the back shelfs, Hard Boiled and Police Story were definitely amongst them, my top 10 do change from time to time.
1. Infernal Affairs
2. In the Mood for Love
3. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
4. Beast Cops
5. Happy Together
6. 2046
7. A Simple Life
8. Chungking Express
9. Let the Bullets Fly
10. Hard Boiled
Post a Comment