Tatsuya Nakadai did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Genta in Kill!
Kill! is essentially Kihachi Okamoto’s version of Sanjuro, though in this version two strangers get involved in a clan conflict over the corrupt and non-corrupt forces.
We sadly finally lost the great Tatsuya Nakadai which is one of the great discoveries for me from this endeavor. Such a multi-fact talent, and here’s another one of his great talents as essentially Nakadai gets to take on the opposite of his parts against Toshiro Mifune in Yojimbo and Sanjuro, where he played the chief villain each time, here he plays the hero who happens upon the situation. What’s wonderful is Nakadai’s take on the hero is completely his own and not for a second do you see him trying to replicate Mifune’s specific energy. Rather Nakadai brilliantly comes at things his own way, even the presentation of Genta where Nakadai very much plays into the idea of why everyone he’s around would falsely believe his Genta to be just a drifter of no note. As Nakadai has this casual energy that is just amazing here as every look from him is wonderful in creating truly the sense of a man just going along with life seemingly at this point. Offering a particularly enjoyable contrast to Hanji (Etsushi Takahashi), a peasant who wants to become a samurai who is almost hyperactive in his endeavor, Nakadai brings this passive energy, that is so remarkable because he is wholly charismatic in this totally unexpected casual demeanor.
Nakadai is able to accentuate this ease of his presence where he brings the audience specifically into his sense of the situation where even as we see far more dramatic people going around as they find a small group in a clan is trying to weed out the larger scale corruption but the odds are against them, Nakadai brings an innate intelligence where every glance from him speaks so much into Genta calculating so much even as everyone either dismisses him or considers him of dangerous only in the sense of being a potential spy. Nakadai’s way of delivering every line of Genta basically allows others to think whatever they want as a “why not” confidence of someone who knows he’s got more than a hand up on everyone however entirely in his own way. Nakadai’s performance is a combination between being the hero and being hilarious however by playing the hero in such a path of least resistance sort of fashion. Where Nakadai brings the brilliance of the man though as someone who doesn’t want to force, making it so he does everything his own, rather amusing fashion. Something shown in the earliest fight scene where he’s tied up and maneuvers around within the action, where just every glance and even his physical way of walking about manages to be very funny, while also emphasizing the intelligence of the character. Particularly his pitch perfect exasperation when he sees the good members of the clan make a bad decision.
Nakadai’s Genta acts in his own way like the samurai of Sanjuro, but again his way of directives is quite different, because the expectations of others is that he is this vagrant. So what we get instead is Nakadai’s deliveries which are all wonderful where he convinces people to do the right thing not through demand, but this very specific charisma of someone who seems to know exactly what everyone needs to do, though not for any particular reason. Nakadai lets us in on the fun which is particularly special where we get the moments where he considers certain options such as knowing there is a woman the good men might come to blows over and finds out that she’s heading to the men. Nakadai’s great in the way he speaks first with certainty but then when he hears the bad news, his immediate switch to a growing concern as he unravels more of the situation makes it so we are also benefiting from this knowledge that comes so easy to him. So easy to him that even when he’s surviving attacks from a semi-apologetic Hanji, Nakadai movements are so great as he manages to make it all look easy while also weirdly stumbling, as he is able to convincingly be this “accidental” expert in every quality. I especially love how even when his semi-friend is trying to kill him, Nakadai doesn’t react at being upset, rather it is with this knowing manner of someone using it to teach a lesson, not as a punishment but as a way to genuinely help Hanji out with his much sloppier path.
We eventually do have moments where Genta is pushed into a corner and is forced to show his hand a bit. In those moments, Nakadai essentially becomes the man just simply cutting cake when using his sword and shows how naturally that Genta is simply beyond everyone in his skill even pressed to show off. His manner showing that his heartbeat maybe raises from below average to just average in these moments, as again Nakadai’s energy level here is so great in just how atypical yet convincing it is as such an atypical hero. We do get a key moment where we find out Genta’s primary motivation, where Genta was tired of the samurai life and particularly his own failure to weed out corruption in his own clan. Nakadai’s great in the scene because of how little he puts on it. Instead every word is simply the truth from his mouth, where there is a quiet underlying emotion of the sense of loss and even more so the strict imperative to do the right thing from now albeit in his own particular way. A way that gets more complicated when he gets caught and beaten for his efforts at a certain point, though saved by Hanji. I love it though when the barely received Genta comes up with the plan with Hanji and the good members of the clan, which includes Genta casually stating he will take down the lead villain of the clan, who also just happens to be the best swordsman of the entire clan. Nakadai’s performance again shows strength in ease, as even as he’s not trying to sell it, there is a strange even more powerful confidence in the ease of his conviction, as the essentially physically beaten down man says he’ll be the strongest man with the ease of man saying what he’ll have for lunch. Leading to a most unorthodox final battle where Genta utilizes the smallness of a room to disable his opponents use of a sword and commandeers a candle stick. Nakadai even in performing this action scene is great because again he manages this weird yet ideal combination between sloppiness and precision. Where obviously Genta knows exactly what he’s doing yet does it in a way where only he knows this, and Nakadai makes this all so effortlessly convincing while being comedic while never being a joke. Honestly Nakadai’s work here is so particular in its success because he is a total badass while being quite silly and what a natural combination he makes it. It is however merely another grand entertaining testament to the vast talents of the man who could be the most insidious of villains, or just an absolute delight of a hero as he is here.


112 comments:
I gotta say, Nakadai probably had one of the greatest faces in all of cinema.
Louis: Thoughts on this Rowan Atkinson comedy skit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZMoB6ms2mE
1. Heard
2. Biswas
3. Macfadyen
4. Nakadai
5. Gielgud
Agreed on everything here, definitely want to rewatch it even more now.
Louis: are there any 'bit part' actors you've seen in recent films who you'd love to see get an opportunity to get a bigger role or even a leading part? I was just thinking recently how I could imagine someone like Leigh Gill really knocking it out of the ballpark if he was given a substantial role, given how he's already been pretty good in small parts helmed by directors in less than adequate form.
Calvin: You know what, I'd like to see what Brady Hepner (Kountze in The Holdovers) has in him.
Calvin: You didn't ask me, but I'd say Louis Cancelmi.
I like those two choices, too.
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of The Ugly Stepsister.
Luke, are there any animated films released in 2026 that could make an impact on the blog's readership.
Anonymous:
Wildwood
Ray Gunn
The Legend Of Aang: The Last Airbender
Hoppers and Toy Story 5 don't interest me at all and I need to see more about Hexed although my faith in Disney is at an all-time low.
Louis: On your ten most anticipated list, I'm rather surprised Joel Coen's Jack Of Spades didn't make the list.
Changing my predictions as well.
1. Biswas
2. Heard
3. Nakadai
4. Macfadyen
5. Gielgud
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of The History Of Sound.
Harris:
It’s a good bit particularly just how dark it gets so quickly with Atkinson’s extremely blithe delivery throughout that sets up “is it a Joke” or is the schoolmaster just a complete psychopath. Obviously being the latter in the end.
Luke:
Myren - 4.5(Impressive in terms of just her reactions that capture the horror of so many with such a visceral intensity to every bit that she depicts. She adds to every moment and doesn’t let the makeup just do the work. Beyond that her often silent work is very good in creating the moods of jealousy within her performance and the reactions that take in so many moments. Finding what nuance she can in certain moments by bringing certain moments of capturing joy contrasting from moments of misery. Her performance is able to articulate an emotional honesty even when I thought the scenes themselves really didn’t seem more like a bit of grotesquery for the sake of it.)
Næss - 3(One of the elements that really didn’t work for me because I didn’t find that the notion of her Cinderella really went anywhere. She does what she can to present her reactions as Cinderella-ish than doing things that aren’t that. But it really doesn’t add up to much due to the writing.)
Torp - 4(Brings the expected horrid stepmother/mother energy. Nothing too surprising overall in the long scheme of such a part, but brings the needed directed coldness that she projects to all, even her daughters she theoretically loves. Torp weaponizes the callousness appropriately, though there is perhaps a little amount of teeth sinking in moments.)
Luke:
Wasn’t aware it had been shot.
Mescal - 4(A fairly impressive accent on his part that I found convincing. The part though overall I found a touch repetitive for Mescal to do too much. Rather he just needs to be quietly reflective with occasional bit more frustration or uncertainty to him. Mescal handles these notes effectively and does bring internal life, however never quite brought me into his experience fully. He’s good though with what he has and I would say the overall screenplay holds him back and perhaps the limited chemistry with his co-star.)
O’Connor - 3(Speaking of, not his most impressive performance. I think the role was supposed to be this ball of passion that kind of made a room shine but I thought he was just kind of okay in depicting the general emotions of a scene but didn’t really create that fire I think the role needed. More so, I didn’t really believe him and Mescal wholly together, so when their sex scenes happen I just thought, “that is indeed happening now” rather than seeing it as a natural result of their intense love for one another. Although I wouldn’t say they seemed truly distant, there just wasn’t the fire that I think the film demanded.)
Cooper - 3.5(Nice to see him in a decently sized role and I did like his narration where you felt a natural sense of the history, to the point I wish they had done a bit more with him. Instead we just end up with him being wistful over the past where Cooper’s reactions do their best to grant a sense of that history we saw, but the setup isn’t quite there to make his final moments as powerful as they should be.)
Calvin:
Ty Mitchell from Killers Of the Flower Moon, as maybe a Richard Farnsworth type.
Louis: Takashi and So Matsuyama are the same person. So was a nickname for him.
8000's:
Ok, my PD nomination names came from however they were credited on imdb in the credits section.
Lovely to see Nakadai get yet another 5.
Louis: Your ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast of Kill! (if you haven't given them elsewhere).
The Sea Gull:
Redgrave - 4.5
Mason - 4.5
Signoret - 4
Warner - 4.5
Andrews - 4
Elliott - 3.5
Herlie - 3
Lynch - 3.5
Widdoes - 4.5
Louis: Category placements for Redgrave, Signoret and Widdoes.
And where would you rank Redgrave and Widdoes.
1. Heard
2. Biswas
3. Macfayden
4. Nakadai
5. Gielgud
Louis: If Nicol Williamson was still active from 97 to his death in 2011 and wasn't difficult to work with, which roles would you've liked to see him play.
Louis: Have you read Chekhov's original play? If so, do you feel able to talk about how well the film's screenplay functions as an adaptation? And your thoughts on the film's cast?
5º John Gielgud
4º Matthew Macfadyen
3º Tatsuya Nakadai
2º John Heard
1º Chhabi Biswas
Lars Eidinger has been cast as Brainiac.
Louis: Do you think you'll be able to watch all of the films shortlisted for International Feature Film during this time.
Everyone: how many 5s would you give to De Niro, Keitel, and Pesci?
Matt: Great choice. Will also say, it has been truly frustrating to see some of the reactions towards the casting by people who judge international actors solely on their (often very limited) roles in Hollywood films.
I haven't seen him in anything honestly so I'm going in with a blank slate for him (which I try to do anyway)
Luke:
I'd say all supporting with Warner being the closest to borderline.
Denethor
Rooney (Road to Perdition)
Old Edward
Harris:
I've read it but the real test is having seen it performed well, which I have not seen it performed period. I mention that because plays function very differently as performed particularly in terms of playing to the audience and finding humor in certain moments. Where this version is more or less the play, but with the strict reality of film emphasized, so any humor for example that might be derived is more limited.
Redgrave - (A tricky part to pull off in terms of how much to convey in terms of genuine earnestness of the character and more so a kind of fangirling, for the lack of a better work, and more callous quality of her character. Redgrave I think manages to hit an effective note by managing to be convincing in both regards which is tricky but she does it. As you do believe the sense of interest in Mason’s character’s life with this genuine less selfish quality where there is the notion of a dream, but she balances that with just the edges of the intrigue maybe being too intense in her way that her notions of dreaming are in their way a falsehood. It’s a delicate balance that she manages to realize most remarkably well.)
Mason - (I mean I’m always ready to praise some Mason who offers his always grand presence so remarkably well. Although Mason I think does well to make the age of the character an essential facet of his version where you see in his reactions to Redgrave’s adulations, Mason brings a combination between more simple lusts with genuine fascination of her fascination. Mason is able to find the needed complexity within the character where he does elicit a degree of sympathy by showing some real reflection and honesty in a moment that could be played with more of a self-serving quality. Mason shows a man though searching for his own happiness in his way, rather than just a new way to enjoy his semi-fame which I think could’ve easily been another choice for the character. Mason though makes a bit more empathy at times even in the character’s certain successes and I think crafts a balanced portrait.)
Signoret - (Now Signoret plays more than anything the intensity of the callousness of her character where she notes how “she’s an actress” where Signoret presents each repetition of that without difference as this kind of coverall to any question of her behaviors or any problem. Signoret doesn’t emphasize too much complexity here but her approach works instead emphasizing that vapidity.)
Warner - (Probably the trickiest part to pull off as this is primed to become just the most insufferable person every second on screen. And that isn’t to say that Warner isn’t insufferable in the first act in particular, because he is. But Warner manages to importantly not bring it all to the surface of the character’s unending frustrations and feelings of inadequacy. Rather finding the moments between the raging of just the deep insecurities that define the man, but also balancing that in his appearances later where there is more reflection. Reflection that in no way removes the insecurities but rather depicts the man’s raw nerve all the more, and effectively creating the journey to the man to his eventual end as we see him become quieter, but just as filled with pain that leads to the natural conclusion of his end.)
Andrews - (I think provides the right kind of a rock of contrast of someone who is very straightforward with his feelings and even his emotions of his impending death. Andrews is direct, even comedic at times but also moving in showing it to all be a reality for him.)
Elliott - (A very distracting makeup job however beyond that I did like his way of limiting his delivery of someone who is always bringing the late comment to things and thinks a bit more than many of the others about what he is going to say.)
Herlie - 3(Fine but just makes far less of an impact than anyone else.)
Lynch - 3.5(He’s mostly there but does make the most of a pivotal moment where his wife says exactly what she thinks of him and his reaction is rather heartbreaking.)
Widdoes - 4.5(A performance that makes the most of all the margins of her work. Where she is constantly letting you know what is really going on after every line said to or near her character. Letting you quietly in on her own emotional turmoil even as she often just brings the most bright of smiles to someone who is projecting contentment. Within that contentment though she is consistently able to emphasize the moments where you see she is anything but and does so much of just in these remarkable silences. Leading to one of her bigger moments later that is a short but very impactful line that she has built up to in seeing what this person has been holding in up until that bit of a release.)
Anonymous:
As many as are available to me.
Calvin & Matt:
Well I for one am looking very much forward to Brainiac trying to get his friend's orchestral piece right while dealing with his dying parents and wayward sister.
Luke:
#3 Widdoes, #4 Redgrave.
Louis: My winning request is Billy Crystal - When Harry Met Sally.
I recently rewatched it as a tribute to Reiner. I was impressed by how well the film has aged 35 years later and it remains, for me, the last great modern romantic comedy.
Crystal was the best scene partner with Ryan, far superior to Hanks. An unlikely casting choice that reminded me of Roy Scheider in All That Jazz.
Watched SLC Punk! yesterday and I am convinced that Lillard's win for that on here is about as perfect of a win as it can be. That performance rules!
Perfectionist: Makes two of us. I really, really hope he doesn't lose his win to James Woods lol.
Hugo Weaving is my 1998 winner for The Interview, but Lillard's win falls into that specific category I love of a cool character actor suprising everybody with a great performance, so I also hope he's there to stay as #1.
Louis: Thoughts on the Immortal Man trailer.
Louis: Any other Chekhov works you've read? And how would you cast The Sea Gull using present-day actors?
Luke:
Well the presentation of the return of Tommy Shelby was far more hype inducing that what we got with that first Avengers Doomsday. Obviously just some random images beyond that but certainly compelling ones.
Louis: What are your ratings and thoughts on the cast of Homebound?
Louis: Who do you think has the cutest hat in South Park?
Your ratings and thoughts on Lucy Punch, Juliet Stevenson and Miriam Margoyles in Being Julia?
Louis: Your thoughts on Rhea Perlman, John Mulaney, Gaby Hoffmann, Simon Rex, Eva Jade Halford and Alia Shawkat in Poker Face S2.
Just saw Marty Supreme. I walked in ready to be critical about it, but I have to admit I kinda couldn’t be? Fuck, we’ve really been blessed with films this year.
I’m gonna think a bit on Chalamet’s placement in my ranking, but I’d pretty safely put him top 3, and Odessa A’zion will likely make my supporting actress lineup. I’d also be super down for a bundle review of Kevin O’Leary, Abel Ferrara, Tyler the Creator and Koto Kawaguchi.
And to be totally clear, this doesn’t change the fact that Kevin O’Leary’s comments about AI were buffoonish and he should not be nominated for awards.
Merry Christmas Everyone.
Yes Merry Xmas Everyone.
Louis: If you're planning on watching Arthur Christmas today, could I have your ratings and thoughts on the cast.
Merry Christmas everybody!
Michael: Man, the AI comments are so low on the list of reasons he sucks.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, everyone!
Merry Christmas Everybody
Happy holidays, everyone!
Merry Christmas everyone!
Matt: Admittedly, I’d never heard of him before reading about the AI comments
Michael: ratings for the cast of Marty Supreme?
Merry Christmas everybody! 🎁🎄
Chalamet: 5
A’zion: 5
Drescher: 3.5
Sloman: 3.5
Manley: 4
Paltrow: 4
O’Leary: 4.5
Röhrig: 3.5
Tyler: 4
Cohen: 3.5
Ferrara: 4
Kawaguchi: 4.5
A lot of the supporting cast could go up on rewatch.
Louis and everyone: Which actors would you like to see taking a stab at playing Ebenezer Scrooge? Personally my money's on Alfred Molina.
Yytrewq: Mark Rylance and Peter Capaldi
Yytrewq: Bill Nighy or David Bradley.
Ytrewq: I'd be interested in what Samuel L Jackson could do with the role.
Ytrewq: Demian Bichir 🇲🇽
Ytrewq: Takeshi Kitano
Is it permissible for me to change my recommendation at this point, as long as Louis hasn't watched it yet?
Louis (or anyone else) thoughts on the “Madden” teaser?
(Unless you decide to watch the official one instead of this one)
Also, just curious, do you avoid trailers to avoid potential spoilers? You want as much of a surprise as you can have?
Hope everyone had a happy Xmas.
1. Heard
2. Biswas
3. Macfadyen
4. Nakadai
5. Gielgud
Louis, could I get your thoughts and ratings on:
Maia Morgernstern, The Passion of the Christ
Carole Bouquet, Red Lights
Cate Blanchett, Coffee and Cigarettes
Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast of Went The Day Well.
Louis: If you're willing to allow it, could I change my recommendation from Audition to a rewatch of The Piano.
1. Heard
2. Biswas
3. Nakadai
4. Macfadyen
5. Gielgud
RIP Brigitte Bardot
RIP Brigitte Bardot
RIP Brigitte Bardot
RIP Brigitte Bardot
J96: Overall I'm just going to say that Madden is probably going to be a shitshow due to David O. Russell, but at least an interesting one due to Nicolas Cage and Christian Bale.
Louis: Your TV Top Tens for 2025.
Louis: How was your holiday?
RIP Brigitte Bardot, the icon
Louis: Ratings And Thoughts on the cast of Springsteen.
I was so frustrated by Strong’s scenes in Springsteen specifically, because I actually really liked the approach he was taking to the character but he was brought down by the writing, which mostly involved him stating out loud all of the subtext that should have just been left to Cooper and White to convey.
Strong's scenes were definitely the weakest part of the screenplay. Too much (literal) armchair psychology. It doesn't help that absolutely no one would ever talk like that in 1981.
Louis: Could you explain what you mean by a "hospice" documentary, and what are your thoughts/rating for Leonie Benesch in Late Shift.
Like, by saying "hospice", do you mean anything in particular about the quality or intentions of most documentaries about the terminally ill?
Wake Up Dead Man cast ratings
Craig-4
O'Connor-5
Close-4.5
Brolin-4.5
Kunis-2(MISCAST)
Renner-2.5
Washington-2.5
Scott-4
Spaeny-3.5
McCormack-3.5
Church-3
Wright-3
Everett-3.5
Alright Boys, it's almost 2026, meaning the century is 25 years old. In honor of this event, i would like everyone to name their absolute favorite films from 2001 to now. (I'm picking 25 because that fits, but you all can give as many as you want)
25) Knives Out
24) 1917
23) The Father
22) The Dark Knight
21) Oppenheimer
20) Brokeback Mountain
19) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
18) Donnie Darko
17) Inception
16) Blade Runner 2049
15) West Side Story
14) The Prestige
13) The Hunt
12) No Country For Old Men
11) Birdman
10) Parasite
9) Inglourious Basterds
8) Mad Max Fury Road
7) The Departed
6) Nightmare Alley
5) Silver Linings Playbook
4) Another Round
3) La La Land
2) The Lord of the Rings (YES IT COUNTS AS ONE)
1) The Social Network
Tim: Keeping it to just ranking my #1 films for each year of the 21st century so far, so it would be a little different if I didn't keep it to one film per year. Also, trying to rank my top 6 was especially painful, with the top 3 being interchangeable.
1. Silence
2. Parasite
3. In Bruges
4. Mad Max: Fury Road
5. Drive
6. In the Mood for Love
7. LOTR
8. The Prestige
9. Decision to Leave
10. Phantom Thread
11. Inglourious Basterds
12. The Social Network
13. Zodiac
14. Spirited Away
15. Oppenheimer
16. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
17. City of God
18. Nosferatu
19. The Favorite
20. The Grand Budapest Hotel
21. The Hunt
22. The Wolf of Wall Street
23. The Tragedy of Macbeth
24. Pride and Prejudice
Still have too much to see for 2025, although OBAA would probably be in the 16-20 range if I was made to choose.
Well, my top 25 could easily change tomorrow. LOL!
I WOULD consider picking my #1 from each year, but my #2 or #3 from one year could be better than my #1 from another.
But I’ll do my best.
The Dark Knight
Mad Max Fury Road
There Will be Blood
Parasite
Children of Men
Wolf of Wall Street
Arrival
Logan
Across the Spider-Verse
Dunkirk
Creed
Whiplash
The Favourite
Grand Budapest Hotel
All Quiet on the Western Front
Get Out
Bladerunner 2049
RRR
Dune Part 2
MI: Fallout
The Green Knight
Oppenheimer
West Side Story
The Harder They Fall
Interstellar
#26 would be Phantom Thread
Dang, I definitely like Inglorious Bastards and Wall E better than some of these.
Expect a recount. LOL!
RIP Isiah Whitlock Jr.
RIP Isiah Whitlock Jr. Sheeee-it.
R.I.P. Isiah Whitlock Jr.
Tim: Let me try. Not a recount of everything I've ever given a 10 to, but rather the 25 that speak/mean the most to me rn.
25. An Elephant Sitting Still
24. A Serious Man
23. City of God
22. Amor Fantasma
21. A Different Man
20. Nightmare Alley
19. Uncut Gems/Good Time (don't make me pick)
18. Hot Fuzz
17. Licorice Pizza
16. Birdman
15. Tar
14. Poor Things
13. The Lighthouse
12. El Secreto de sus Ojos
11. Oppenheimer
10. Monster
9. The Favourite
8. Y Tu Mamá También
7. Moonlight
6. Mulholland Dr.
5. In Bruges
4. Parasite
3. The End of The Tour
2. Adaptation
1. The Social Network
RIP Isiah Whitlock Jr.
RIP Isiah Whitlock Jr.
If I had to do top 25, I'll do it in alphabetical order.
A.I. Artificial Intelligence
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Decision to Leave
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Get Out
Inglourious Basterds
Little Women
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
Mad Max: Fury Road
Monster (2023)
A Most Violent Year
Mulholland Drive
The New World (172 minute cut)
Oppenheimer
Parasite
Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl
The Prestige
Pride and Prejudice
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (have to be honest to myself)
Silence
The Social Network
Spirited Away
The Tree of Life
20th Century Women
West Side Story
Rest In Peace Isiah Whitlock Jr.
I plan to make this list of the best films of the 21st century only after seeing some films from 2025 that I still haven't seen.
Louis and folks
Tell me which films from 2026 are most anticipated:
10º Rosebush Pruning
9º Hope (호프) by Na Hong-jin
8º Here Comes the Flood
7º 1949 by Paweł Pawlikowski
6º Jack of Spades
5º Wild Horse Nine
4º The Adventures of Cliff Booth
3º Digger
2º Disclosure Day
1º Dune Part 3
BRAZINTERMA: Louis gave his list on the last page.
For me, it's (no order):
Jack of Spades
1949
Wild Horse Nine
Paper Tiger
Fjord
Disclosure Day
A Long Winter
Bunker
Bucking Fastard
Saturn Return
Hey Louis and guys
Starting at the end of the year, I'd like to play a game of futurology with you all: who are the favorites for the 2027 Oscars? I know it's very bold to talk about this now, without any films having been released or any statistics available. So try to guess from your heart.
Picture: Wild Horse Nine
Director: Denis Villeneuve - Dune Part Three
Lead Actor: Tom Cruise - Digger
Lead Actress Emily Blunt - Disclosure Day
Supporting Actor: Steve Buscemi or John Malkovich - Wild Horse Nine
Supporting Actress: Parker Posey - Wild Horse Nine
BRAZINTERMA: No order
The Drama
Parallel Tales
Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man
Disclosure Day
Wild Horse Nine
Artificial
The Odyssey
Digger
Dune Part Three
The Dog Stars
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
Hey guys
Last question of the year: which actors will be in the Another Year and Another Official Lineup in a few hours?
Lead
Wagner Moura
Leonardo DiCaprio
Timothée Chalamet
Ethan Hawke
Michael B. Jordan
Supporting
Benicio del Toro
Sean Penn
Stellan Skarsgård
Paul Mescal
Jacob Elord
My guess is the same as Shaggy’s only with Edgerton over Hawke
Ehhhh I think Hawke has a much better shot than Edgerton at this point.
I kind of hope Hawke doesn’t happen. Felt he was pretty miscast.
I'm just saying he's getting more citations than Edgerton.
We could have all 5's in both Lead and Supporting for the first time provided the Academy lines up, which is exciting.
I could see Edgerton definitely getting in over Hawke especially since his film will most likely be stronger whereas Hawke is probably a lone nominee. I also wouldn't rule out Plemons entirely given how well Bugonia did on the shortlists.
Harris:
The Seagull
Uncle Vanya
Three Sisters
The Cherry Orchard
Lucas:
Khatter & Jethwa - 3.5(Both give credible performances that have a degree of charm to them though I wouldn’t say either is a star type performance where they brighten this narrative beyond the confines of it. As is both are good in their moments of earnest warmth combined with as natural moments of general frustration at the system and between each other. They’re good though I didn’t think either elevated the material to something where they were more than just good.)
8000’s:
…..uh….Stan’s…I guess?
Anonymous:
Perlman - (She’s totally fine in playing the note of the callous gangster essentially and carries what she did in the previous season of just a vocal performance with the rest of her work here. There’s not too much nuance to what she’s doing but she brings the general menace needed.)
Mulaney - (Really just doing his usual thing but playing a villain as such. It works though.)
Hoffman - (One of the more sympathetic killers, and I did enjoy her particular sort of “can’t believe I’m falling this low” desperation that we see throughout her episode. She manages to find some empathy for her character particularly as the situation gets worse and the nonsense she wears pretty effectively with that sense of disbelief in herself.)
Rex - (He’s good in a fairly straightforward killer as he’s really just direct about everything and while he’s not empathetic exactly, his “kill” is semi-unintentional and Rex plays I think well a less sinister note, albeit a selfish one and does find nuance in avoiding becoming an obvious villain even in the later moments, particularly in his moment of a sudden refound confidence in himself.)
Halford - (Enjoyable evil kid performance, very much plays into the tropes as such but does so in a way where she so directly owns the evil that she finds the comedy of it quite naturally.)
Shawkat - (Feel she gives far too small of variations in her performances. This is an example of such where it is just the same blase thing she always does but just in the form of killer this time.)
Tybalt:
Punch - (Seemingly doing the over the top brat routine it seems she does most of the time. This instance is very poorly implemented due to the fact that you are supposed to take her seriously as some sort of star who pulls everyone away from Julia. Punch’s over the top approach doesn't make that believable, nor is she successfully funny in doing a comedic take.)
Stevenson & Margoyles - 3(Both have very perfunctory roles however I found they were successful in at least being believable albeit in such limited ways.)
J96:
All I can say is that it is some terrible makeup.
I just would rather go in knowing as little as possible. For example Parasite was one of my very best viewings ever and I had not seen a second of footage of it.
Harris:
I’d have to really rewatch Passion to give proper thoughts on her.
Bouquet - 3.5(Her performance is relatively limited within the scheme of the film though I think she does well to offer a basic human reaction to what is going on and creating the growing distress in her performance, along with frustration that reflects against her onscreen partner’s increasingly callous and abhorrent behavior.)
Blanchett - 3.5(It’s a fun “twin” performance, one half callous as hell and the other just quietly annoyed at having to deal with her though with a certain grace to it regardless. It is a funny bit essentially of Blanchett playing herself and making fun of herself as her counterpart. She’s having enough fun with it that she lets us in on it too, but it doesn’t add up to anything too noteworthy.)
Tybalt:
That’s fine.
Robert:
Great, as many may guess I’m still on it.
Tybalt:
No, it was just a descriptor.
Post a Comment