Nawazuddin Siddiqui did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Detective Dayashankar Kapoor in Mom.
Mom follows a college professor Devki (Sridevi) who seeks revenge for her step daughter after she is brutally sexually assaulted by a group of men.
I will say Nawazuddin Siddiqui is an actor I reviewed three times before this and in each instance has been a disparate performance and character. Siddiqui physically in each instance looks very different, no more so than in this film as he appears as a mostly bald private detective with a style all his own, who happens to hear about the plight of Devki’s stepdaughter, being missing initially, who is eventually found near death. Unfortunately for Devki, due to the stepdaughter having been drinking her testimony is put into question and the four men are exonerated by the courts despite their obvious guilt leading Devki to take the law into her own hands. In order to do this more effectively she calls upon Siddiqui detective Kapoor to help her. Siddiqui’s initial appearance is well performed in establishing the idiosyncratic nature of his character. Siddiqui is once again very much doing his own thing and successfully in the way he holds himself as a purposeful peculiarity. Something that works as presents himself as a peculiarity, where Siddiqui specific eagerness to help he paints with the right ambiguity between someone who is genuine in his keen eyed interest as he almost looks like a dog waiting for a treat with his specifically curious eyes and particularly accentuated grin, that may denote almost an ambulance chaser version of a detective, or just a man who presents his genuine interest in helping in his own unusual way. Well it becomes the latter clearly when Devki utilizes his skills as a detective to track down and find different ways to seek revenge against each of the guilty men. Siddiqui continues his ambiguous but entertaining note, where basically what he does is offer some levity within the rather dark situation. He does so in a way that works just through his off-beat delivery that fits and works for this off-beat oddball character. So every time he comes in for some exposition or moment of maneuvering the revenge plan, Siddiqui comes at it with his own unique angle that fits this eccentric character. What Siddiqui does effectively is show sort of the growth and investment of Kapoor into the revenge that is beyond monetary benefits. Something we see when he keeps mentioning his mother, something that Siddiqui plays initially seemingly within the eccentricity of Kapoor, but as he continues to mention it his eyes effectively denote a real care and outright empathy where his mother represents what Devki is doing for her stepdaughter. Siddiqui utilizes just that much more investment, he doesn’t lose the eccentricity by revealing sincerity as the ambiguity leaves to show that his investment goes beyond monetary compensation. An element that is featured even more strongly in his final scene where he comes face to face with the most dangerous of the men. Siddiqui’s wonderful in this scene by playing the shades of a sense of dread, but with a bravery of a man who has no desire to suffer fools of this hideous man. His delivery of correcting the man about a correct pronunciation is pitch perfect because he manages to make it a joke to Kapoor but also with it this real belief in Devki as he spells out the man’s own doom. Siddiqui hitting his height in this moment that exemplifies his overall effectiveness in the role, that makes the comedic elements of the character speak to more than just the comedy, though it works straightforwardly as well, by funneling within a highly specific character that he makes believable, while also using it to allude to a greater depths to the real motivation of the man. It’s a strong performance that really other than Sridevi, manages the very tricky tone of the film to deliver another wholly engaging performance, that for Siddiqui is yet another performance that didn’t for a moment make me think of the other performances of his I’ve reviewed here.
104 comments:
Louis, your ranking of the films of Danny Boyle (based off your previous rankings, I predict you will have SM at the bottom), and once you’ve seen it, about where would you insert 28 Years Later?
J96:
Trainspotting
Shallow Grave
28 Days Later
Steve Jobs
Sunshine
T2
127 Hours
Slumdog Millionaire
Louis: Your rating and thoughts on Sridevi and the rest of the cast? I'm glad you appreciated Siddiqui's work as much as you did here, he's truly terrific in a different way compared to his other performances.
When Louis rewatches Blade Runner 2049 I hope he gives Ford another chance.
John Smith: Damn i now regret my request of hedlund i ådalen 31. I should have requested the best nawaz performance which is in photograph ):):):
I hope Jackman will remain in your top 5.
You plan on rewatching Lady Bird?
Louis: Could I have your thoughts on these scenes from the film?
The attack
The verdict
Ending (I was relieved that it didn't go full Promising Young Woman with Devki)
Shaggy: I agree, Ford is an easy 4.5 for me.
Louis: Have you watched any Ken Burns documentaries, and if so which is your favourite?
Louis: How many episodes from Boardwalk Empire Season 4 do you have remaining.
28 Years Later is neither a failure nor a knock out. The narrative very much is a part of hopefully a satisfying whole. As a piece it contains some effective tense moments, some interesting world building, and a few good performances, particularly Fiennes. But the biggest emotional moments also felt a bit muted, there are a few dumb character actions, the Alpha zombies are eeriely close to the same exact things in Army of the Dead, and Boyle does a bit of his famous overcooking with his edits. Still found it compelling enough albeit a film I always felt should've been more compelling than it is.
Comer - 4
Taylor-Johnson - 3.5
Williams - 3.5
Fiennes - 4
Riding- 3
O'Connell - TBD (Will have to see where they are going with it)
Louis: If you've never given them before, could I have your thoughts on Leonardo DiCaprio's Oscar speech? It's such a hilariously extreme contrast to Brody's second win in terms of the level of preparedness, while being a solid speech in and of itself.
Louis: Considering he was a Wisconsinite, what do you think of Welles directing a La Follette biopic with Cotten in the part and maybe Welles as either Roosevelt or Taft?
Could you rewatch Phantom Thread before you wrap up? And your thoughts on the Materialists cast?
Seen 28 Years Later twice now and suffice to say I'm probably the most positive on the film on here, to say the least. Fiennes and Comer both easy 5's for me.
Is it necessary to watch 28 Weeks Later to understand 28 Years, or is the latter more of a standalone?
Ralph Fiennes is having quiet a good run. The Menu, an Oscar nominated performance with Conclave, and now another great performance in 28 Years Later.
It always felt so wrong that The English Patient for so long, was Ralph Fiennes final Oscar nomination.
Louis: Time for my winning request.... you ready?
Tahmeed:
Sridevi - 5(She gives an extremely impressive performance where even when I didn’t love the tone I thought she always managed it brilliantly. As there’s a lot of potential silliness within the character in the moments of exacting revenge in a rather potboilerish way. The key is though that Sridevi’s performance never limits herself to such a station within her performance. Rather she convincingly brings such an honest determination in her performance where the emotional undercurrents of everything that is going on is always so alive in her performance that it elevates every moment that she is in. The thing is though her work is in many ways more complicated than that because Sridevi’s performance captures more than just revenge even though that too is part of it. Rather there is always the complicated sense of her proving herself essentially as a mother to specifically a stepdaughter. She finds nuance in her reaction by allowing a small sense of that need for acceptance within the very real heartbreak around it. Sridevi’s performance consistently brings so much more than just indignation, as great as that is when she depicts it. Because what she finds is the emotional struggle within the determination of who is getting revenge for part of the crime, but also in this sense of duty that she feels she needs to live up to. Sridevi makes you feel every moment of this and is amazing.)
Khanna - 3.5(As the inspector creating the obstacles basically I thought he managed to not go too hard on the notes, creating the right understated empathy that is just below his tougher demeanor of the man who is adamant that no one takes the law into their own hands. He’s good and convincingly creates the arc of his character.)
Aly - 4(Her performance certainly makes the crime scene particularly hard to watch because she is so convincing every moment of it, and even afterwards brings such a raw nerve of pain that makes all of it just feel painfully real rather than overwrought.)
Adnan Siddiqui - 3.5(Does leave as much of an impact on Sridevi even within his limited scope, but I did find him moving regardless in playing the heartbreak over the situation. Even if at a certain point it leaves him a little one note.)
The Men - 3(Found all on similar levels but managed to be creepy sleazebags without overplaying the note too much.)
The Attack is horrifying and while it does show some restraint, which I appreciated in that I don’t think you need *that* much detail to the point it can become exploitative. But I will say what they do give you is especially unnerving because of how blunt and brutal it is, especially the “dumping” of the victim at the end.
The Verdict was one of the moments that I didn’t love with the over the top camera choices and the sudden Danny Boyle editing to boot and found it fell into becoming too much.
Ending certainly was a choice that it decided just to go to that extreme, but I will say the execution of it certainly works in sort of the bluntness of it all.
Jonathan:
I’ll admit I’ve gotten distracted by other things, and wasn’t as gripped as season 3 though I have liked it. I will get back to it though.
Matt:
The Civil War
Baseball
Thomas Jefferson
Lewis & Clark
Not For Ourselves Alone
Unforgivable Blackness
Prohibition
The Dust Bowl
The Roosevelts: An Intimate History
Jackie Robinson
The Vietnam War
Probably the Civil War is my favorite.
Tahmeed:
Yes, I think you can argue maybe just a touch too formal that suggests a long time coming, which can kind of happen with the sweeper wins. But a wholly good speech in that formality regardless, as his careful wording gets him through his thank yous elegantly and even his moving onto his talking about the environment he connects to his film.
I’ve heard 28 Weeks is nearly retconned out of existence, which is to say I certainly was not lost without having seen it.
8000’s:
I mean I most certainly could’ve seen that in every respect.
Harris:
Although not really a spoilery movie per se, I do think discovering where the characters go and in turn the performances go is part of its appeal so let me hold off on that.
RatedRStar:
Sure.
Louis: Choose..... 1939 or 1946? =D, you know I love doing this to you whenever I get a winning request.
1946 then since it has no requests currently.
Louis: You know who it is dont you lol?
RatedRStar: Claude Rains in Deception.
RatedRStar: Just curious - what was the 2007 performance you were considering for a request recently?
Louis: It is..... Claude Rains in Deception.. Well done Luke.
I know you too well at this point. :)
Haha, he is very good to be fair, in full villain mode along side his favorite CoStar Bette Davis who thought the same of him.
Luke: Would you like to guess the 1939 option.... it was a lead performance...?
Is it still Claude Rains because Sons Of Liberty is only 20 minutes.
Luke: Good guess... it is not Rains in Sons of Liberty although I do want Louis to see it.
Louis: Glad you loved Sridevi as much as I did, damn shame this was her final performance.
On a side note, I was quite surprised to see Adarsh Gourav (who I only know from The White Tiger) in the film as well.
It's probably Daughters Courageous then though the title misled me into thinking it was a Supporting role.
Luke: The 1939 choice was not Claude Rains =D.
Give me a clue.
Harris Marlowe: The 2007 original was originally going to be Jack Davenport in Pirates of the Caribbean at World's End because I thought he did so much in his final death scene and actually showed a lot of charisma and deviance in regards to Knightley's character. so much more than Knightley and Bloom did.
Luke: I mean... I will suggest him when 1939 does come... but.... if you do want to know.....
1939 turned him into a Superstar......
James Stewart in Destry Rides Again.
Luke: You really do know me hahahaha lol =D lol.
Luke: It might not happen but I have heard good things about Destry.
As obvious as it was... I think it made sense.... my favorite ever supporting actor..... and my favorite ever leading actor.......
RatedRStar: You never know with Davenport. I think Louis will review Nighy's performance in both films at the same time (ala Simon Pegg in The Cornetto Trilogy) given that they were both shot back to back rather than in separate lineups.
Jack Davenport seems like an actor who gives it his all.... his posh accent actually tends to work in the 1990s series This Life where alongside Andrew Lincoln he played an arrogant prick quite well lol.
in somewhat regards to what Tahmeed asked (the "somewhat" is pronounced expressively here): Me personally, i only like the first half of 28 Days Later and hate the second half. I much preferred Weeks. It doens't try as hard, but also succeeds more. From what I've heard, Years practically ignores it, which is the main reason why i am in no need to check Years out just now.
My point being: I don't think you need to see Weeks, but i'd recommend it anyway because ... It's just fun, that's why
28 Weeks Later is fine but they shoot themselves in the foot by not focusing squarely on Robert Carlyle's great performance.
Matt: (slight spoilers)
There are two scenes i would call GREAT in Weeks: First the opening (which i consider a masterclass in film openings itself) and second the transformation in the middle. That movie is never as good as it is in those two scenes (which, yes, both focus on Carlyle, who is the only one who gets to really do anything in it) but i really enjoy the rest anyway, and be it only as an action movie
On the sort of topic of 28 Days... what the fuck.
Tahmeed: Took two Klonopin tonight instead of one.
Can anyone find Louis thoughts on Monique in precious? I have used advanced searches and can not find it.
Ending aside, (which I feel I can only judge properly based on The Bone Temple), I thought 28 Years Later was terrific and a very worthy sequel that improves on the first film.
Williams - 4.5
Comer - 5
Fiennes - 4.5
Taylor-Johnson - 4/4.5
Ryding - 3.5
O'Connell - 2.5/3
28 Years Later:
Williams - 4.5
Comer - 5
Fiennes - 4.5
Taylor-Johnson - 4
Ryding - 4
O'Connell - TBD
Omar: Where did you find a copy of Lear On The Shore.
Anonymous: I couldn't find his thoughts on Monique myself, but maybe it wouldn't hurt to ask him for them directly.
Louis: If you don't mind my asking, what are your top 10 films of the 21st century thus far?
There is a marathon of The Pitt going on. I’d like to binge watch it at some point.
Louis, I forgot if you said so or not, but have you watched The Pitt? Thoughts? Cast rankings?
Louis: Your thoughts on this interview with Robert Shaw.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XCwF5PcXkE
Louis, could i have your thought on the 'Tomorrow belongs to me' scene from Cabaret`?
Hey............ Would asking for a 5 for Cruise in Jerry Maguire, be too much, lol??? Man, I watched it. Ohh boy, they are all great in their roles. I would even disagree with you on Gooding Jr's rating.
Anonymous: Ask for a re-watch in December.
I second Anonymous’s motion cone December. Cruise is my current winner for that year after a rewatch.
Louis: Thoughts on the Roofman trailer.
Everybody for those who saw 28 Years Later, I have a question for you: are Fiennes and Comer lead or supporting?
Anonymous: They're both supporting.
Louis: When you review Murphy in 28 Days Later, could you review Gleeson alongside him.
The Social Network 2 is happening. Sorkin is writing and directing.
I really don't know how to feel about this one, guys...
Emi: No Fincher? No dice.
Louis: May I have your thoughts on this clip from Nuremberg (2000).
youtube.com/watch?v=D7kydMg7tIE&pp=ygUdY2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgcGx1bW1lciBudXJlbWJlcmc%3D
Yeah, as great as the script for The Social Network is, what makes it a masterpiece is Fincher.
Denis Villeneuve is directing the next Bond film.
I liked Life of Chuck more than you did, though I'm also going through some stuff that's making me think about existential questions, so I guess it caught me in the right emotional space. I think this is one where I can't blame anyone who loves/hates it.
Also, how many Criterion DVD’s/Blu Rays do you own? I think I’m up to 26 after today. Need to count.
Louis: Speaking of The Social Network, your thoughts on this scene from it and Doug Urbanski's performance in it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZH0oeDv4Es
Louis: Thoughts on the Bugonia trailer.
RIP Lalo Schifrin
RIP Lalo Schifrin
RIP Lalo Schifrin
RIP Lalo Schifrin
R.I.P. Lalo Schifrin.
RIP Lalo Schifrin.
RIP Lalo Schifrin, I appreciate that the MI franchise recognized his work with the theme could never be topped.
RIP Lalo Schifrin.
Harris:
Let's hold off on that for the moment.
J96:
I have not.
8000's:
"Dreyfuss just talks interminably" was absolutely hilarious. Shaw though fits his reputation with every word from his near madness behind his describing the boredom of points of the shoot and his noting use of alcohol as his method to pass the time, while holding a drink. Then a hilarious run down of his fed up with the talk show scene, and a damn shame that his never would win an Oscar was the truth...though more so wrongful taste on the academy's part that his jokes about syphilis I imagine...though then again he was snubbed for this very part somehow.
Anonymous:
Brilliantly constructed scene by Fosse in starting it as though it is just some impassioned song as it begins before revealing the singer, and taking that passion then how it bleeds into the crowd in this intense vicious frenzy, with especially remarkable contrast between the fervor and the reactions of those not swept up in it showing the danger but even more terrifyingly the appeal of such fanaticism.
Jonathan:
All I can say is THIS IS CIANFRANCE?
This will certainly be an attempted show of range if he pulls it off as he basically is doing his own David Gordon Green I guess, from the trailer, maybe it could work, looks kind of amusing but then again could just be total tonal misfire at the same time like say Brothers which was far worse than the trailer suggested.
I mean Plummer doing righteous indignation what more do you need? But Plummer does so much more than that as his great voice can already do much with just exposition which he does so beautifully, but he does more in the way he is able to convey the emotions in the man as he is deeply impacted by the testimony every step of the way even as he brilliantly carries on, creating such a powerful moment by showing the humanity in the deeply professional.
Tahmeed:
Possibly.
Robert:
Only a few I've gotten specifically for review purposes.
Harris:
I'm quite positive I've commented on that scene before including Urbanski's performance in it.
Jonathan:
Lanthimos madness, not written but him, obviously I was in and this trailer only further supports that with great potential being exhibited from Plemons's follow-up collaboration.
Louis: I actually just bought Matewan because I can’t find a copy online that doesn’t look like shit for the same reason. (Also, Chilly Scenes of Winter, since it was on the Barnes and Noble shelf with it)
R.I.P. Lalo Schifrin
Going into F1 I pretty much knew this would be mostly defined by just how good the racing scenes are. And as such I got my money's worth, they look great. But how much did I care emotionally? Eh, a little bit I guess. The drama aspects are nothing new whether it be dealing with trauma, the vet/rookie relationship, even the obvious villain trying to sabotage the whole thing, there's nothing new here, and its execution of the old isn't exceptional, but it is more or less serviceable. I would say probably would've aided the whole piece to just make the whole thing shorter since the drama beats feel a little repetitive due to the limitations of the characters mostly defined by a singular trait, or the actor's trying to get a little blood out of mostly stone. BUT, its enough to not get in the way of the virtues of the racing that do carry this to the end, although for those scenes to have elevated the racing...now that would've been something.
Pitt - 3.5
Idris - 3
Condon - 3.5
Bardem - 3
Menzies - 3
Bodnia - 3
Niles - 3
Louis: I rewatched The Beguiled and Invasion of the Body Snatchers recently.
Hartman and Cartwright sure do have very expressive eyes, don't they?
Louis: Also, thoughts on this.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SPyEHv8NoXg
Louis: Your thoughts on the cast of F1.
Hey! The first poster for Nolan's the Odyssey is here!
Louis: Can I get your thoughts on Cameron's criticism of Oppenheimer not directly showing the Japanese victims of the atomic bomb?
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/6/27/james-cameron-calls-oppenheimer-a-moral-cop-out-for-not-showing-japanese-bombing-aftermath
Louis: Afraid I couldn't find your thoughts on Urbanski. I actually searched for your thoughts on him before I asked.
Marcus: I mean, i guess i kinda get where he's coming from? ... But then again, the movie is called "Oppenheimer", not " The Atomic Bomb", so only showing scenes that concern Oppenheimer is very much fitting.
I mean, all the scenes in Avatar from Quaritch' or Selfridge' perspective were cut out, so i wouldn't talk
Saying Oppenheimer doesn't directly show the effects of the bomb is just...I don't know, it's just misunderstanding what the movie is.
8000's:
They certainly do.
Funny little tribute and very true regarding how most films didn't ask much of MacMurray comparatively.
Anonymous:
Pitt - (Actually better than I expected given I typically don't care for pure movie star Pitt mode too much. Here though I thought he managed to actually bring out his charisma through the rogue energy of the character and find some sense of fun, meanwhile hitting the dramatic beats well enough. It isn't substantial from him but it is good.)
Idris - (Wholly fine but doesn't quite have enough innate charisma to put in what is already lacking within the overall scheme of the character who basically just needs to say "old man" a lot.)
Condon - (I hope she gets a better role than this to followup Banshees, though she does what she can in just bringing some flavor to her standard lines just by the virtue of her innately vivacious presence.)
Bardem - (He's entirely fine I think we needed more of him, though I thought Bardem actually was largely game here in terms of bringing a sense of his character's passion for racing and his friendship with Pitt. Again the writing limits him.)
Menzies - (SPOILER ALERT...I guess he's a sleazebag which is expected but he does it well enough here.)
Bodnia - (Stressed out member of the team he does fine in playing that note...but again the writing only lets him do so much.)
Niles - (Concerned mom with some sass, delivers as such but again...the writing.)
Marcus:
Sounds like someone promoting his own movie idea. Additionally I'm not sure Cameron should talk with the way he depicted William Murdoch in Titanic.
But on Oppenheimer it is very much a "Not how IIIIIIIIIIII would've done IT!!!!". Because Nolan does depict it within Oppenheimer's perspective to me powerfully via the town hall meeting, the cross examine by Clarke, the scene with Truman and the scene of reacting to the slideshow. Some filmmakers are more graphic than others, I think Nolan within his style covered the subject.
Cameron has the subtlety of the world's largest sledgehammer, and I assume the way he would have tackled the victims would have been bordering on tasteless and exploitative, regardless of his actual intentions.
Tahmeed: Not "Would have". Will.
Finally caught up with The Final Reckoning, for which I'm glad I had my expectations tempered. Moderately enjoyed it, despite having many of the same reservations others did.
Cruise - 3
Atwell - 3.5
Pegg - 3.5
Klementieff - 3.5/4 (made me realize how much I underappreciated her in Dead Reckoning)
Saxon - 3.5
Whigham - 3
Morales - 2 (though I enjoyed his OTT reactions in his final scene)
Tulugarjuk - 3 (her scene with Atwell was honestly my favourite part of the movie)
Everyone else is in the 3 to "kind of just there" range.
Tony: I kept telling you all how Klementieff is the obvious strongest asset of Dead Reckoning!
Louis: Could Sewell and Gatiss go up for The Father? I think the former does find the nuance and frustration of the situation very well, while Gatiss is just so disturbing in a short order, especially that last moment of his.
Tahmeed: Gatiss is already a 4, I don't think he needs higher than that.
Matt: I didn't check his current rating before, that's fair. I'd go slightly higher for Sewell though.
Louis: Your 1990s and 2000s cast/director for Materialists.
Louis: Thoughts on the Project Hail Mary trailer.
Post a Comment