Tuesday, 30 July 2024

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1998: Donald Sutherland in Without Limits

Donald Sutherland did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Bill Bowerman in Without Limits.

Without Limits is the second film in a two year period about the tragically short life of runner Steve Prefontaine (Billy Crudup). Superior of the two, though Prefontaine starring Jared Leto, isn't terrible, and Without Limits isn't amazing but it is better.

One of the major improvements between the two is the depiction and performance behind Prefontaine's coach Bill Bowerman, which is a major facet of Without Limits, and thankfully gives me a chance to explore the great talents of the dearly departed Donald Sutherland, incidentally also directed by the dearly departed Robert Towne. Sutherland opens the film with his great voice narrating as we see Steve running in the Olympics as he watches on, before we naturally flash back to the early days of Steve until he eventually goes to the University of Oregon to train under Sutherland as Bowerman. An unlikely introduction as we find Bowerman's first act is to measure each man's foot to design better shoes for them to run in, and Sutherland even as he's looking down with a measuring tape, seemingly not paying attention, still commands the screen with ease. Sutherland cuts through the nonsense with his ease in delivery of a man who has seen plenty, knows his role, knows his methods and therefore doesn't need to sell it to anyone. Such as in this first scene where Steve thinks he has some extra weight saved in Bowerman's shoe designs which Sutherland calmly states his knowledge of already before sending Steve off on his way. Sutherland is theoretically working with some expected material as we see him speak with authority to all the young men in his program, but what makes it something special is the way Sutherland comes at each scene in his own Sutherland way. Sutherland doesn't present himself as the obvious authority figure, despite just always having this presence of "in charge" regardless, rather Sutherland's performance has the natural ease of the man who doesn't need to perform for others, Bowerman already knows.  

So what Sutherland accomplishes is just a dynamic performance in every scene he's in, whether it is breaking some habits of the men, or just forcing them to have certain length haircuts, there's such a seasoned wisdom in Sutherland relaxed way of speaking every word, but also his manner confirms that sensibility every time. Sutherland goes further in that while I wouldn't call this a comedic performance exactly, there is something that isn't entirely disparate from his work in MASH for example, where there's a humorousness to the irreverence of the man. Sutherland isn't playing for laughs, even if he might get a few, rather he's playing for creating an understanding of the character defined by his experience, which is to cut right to it, no matter what the condition may be. And we see this in one of Steve's first great feats of running where everyone else is amazed by the thing, and Sutherland's wonderful in portraying the building annoyance in Bowerman at the showboating. Every time it cuts to him, and really Sutherland, as he consistently does in this film, makes the scene by making his annoyance both amusing but also completely the nature of the character who isn't impressed by flash, he's impressed by substance and skill. And we follow that scene with Sutherland as great in his measured and straightforward manner towards Steve in explaining why Steve screwed up, even though it seemed to everyone else that Steve was doing anything but. Sutherland not only makes this exposition natural, he makes it compelling and captivating in bringing this specific sense in the man's eyes and his words of someone who knows Steve can do better if he follows instruction.

Naturally the film progresses with the relationship between the two growing over time, though Sutherland never exactly makes Bowerman a simple inspirational coach at any moment. I especially love one scene where the guys are talking out of turn in a sauna to be horrified when Bowerman appears having already been in the sauna. Again the moment is made by Sutherland with a very specific, almost villainous, grin on his face that instantly instills terror in the man, and shows the unique sway of Bowerman, even when they're at the Olympics. And at the Olympics where Prefontaine falls short of a medal, it is again Sutherland who truly carries the moment through the quiet intensity of his performance just watching every step and more than anything creates the investment into the scene. And we see that beyond this that Bowerman, despite his manner, does care about Prefontaine, such as confronting him after he chooses to work as a bartender after the Olympics. Sutherland is great though because as much as you can see now that Bowerman definitely sees Steve as more than just another player for him, his delivery is still matter of fact of the wisdom of a man who will simply point out what he sees is wrong and what he sees as right. There's a fantastic scene where Steve mentions offers to go pro which would give him monetary compensation, where Bowerman gives him the immediate pros and cons, though also notes it's Steve's decision. Sutherland's subdued delivery again is of a man who isn't trying to sway Steve rather just painting his options for him as a truly intelligent man would. Sutherland is consistent with character, revealing his warmth, but as always in his Bowerman way that is true to the character. The one real break is in the ending where Sutherland is fantastic, because he still isn't suddenly turning into a different man, rather is extremely moving in showing the calm and concise Bowerman still being as such in caring eulogy, though making the moments of near break so especially potent coming from the tough exterior the man. Sutherland powerfully reveals just how much Steve meant to Bowerman and ends the film on a high note. And this is a great example of the marvelous talent of Donald Sutherland, who takes a potentially rote role and makes the absolute most of it. Coming at every potentially standard scene in his own way, that takes a well worn character of the tough coach, and makes it his own.

17 comments:

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Ratings and thoughts on the cast.

Michael Patison said...

I watched this before districts every cross country season in high school. Love the movie and how, despite it's trappings as an inspirational sports movie, it doesn't make Pre some sort of saint. So glad you liked Sutherland here.

Matt Mustin said...

I was thinking a 4.5 for most of the film and then the final scene came and I found myself getting choked up which I didn't expect. So...yeah, I have to give him a 5 for that.

Lucas Saavedra said...

Louis: your thoughts on R. Lee Ermey in Prefontaine?

Mitchell Murray said...

Another item has been added to the watchlist. And I speak as a Canadian and as an admirer of great acting talent - rest in peace, Donald.

Mitchell Murray said...

Also, to Matt's comment about getting choked up - I haven't experienced that in a long while, but the closest I've gotten recently was rewatching moments from "The King's Speech". Specifically the "I have a voice" scene, and Lionel's reply of "yes, you do". There's pride, empathy and history in Rush's reaction.

Calvin Law said...

Another great turn from one of our greatest actors ever. Had the film been a bigger success overall I imagine he would've gotten the Oscar nomination for this.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: would you be interested in checking out Janet Planet? It's on VOD now and while it might not be your thing, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on it.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the direction and screenplay of In the company of men

Tony Kim said...

Calvin: I guess he'll check it out during his 2024 catch-up later on. That film, Hundreds of Beavers, and I Saw the TV Glow are the recent films I'm the most curious to see how he'd feel about.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I Saw the TV Glow is currently my favorite movie of the year so far, for what it's worth. It's an odd film, as the subtext is not even remotely subtle (body dysmorphia, trans/NB experience), yet it never outright spells out its intentions and still leaves enough ambiguity and intrigue to make me want to revisit it in the future.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

The first 5 episodes of Cobra Kai season 6 (no idea why it's split up in 3 parts) are terrific. I don't know how the show gets a bit more ridiculous every single season, but a better question would be how it stays compelling with that. Peyton List MVP, who's always had one of the more tonally challenging characters, and she knocked it out of the park this time.

Perfectionist said...

Louis: Consider giving Ed Harris an upgrade for The Truman Show. I personally really like that performance.

Ytrewq Wertyq said...

Louis: Since you mentioned watching it in one of your recent Letterboxd reviews, what are your thoughts on Naomi Watts and Brian Cox in The Ring remake?

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Crudup - 4(I think he gives a fine low key charismatic performance, doesn't go hard in any direction to make Prefontaine a likeable enough guy, though with a certain ego and some base needs that keep him far from perfect. He largely hits this certain wavelength and mostly sticks to it, in a way that is believable and works, as Crudup doesn't play him as a man achieving greatness, or a man awaiting tragedy, just a typical guy, with a great talent, no more, no less, which I think was the right approach.)

Potter - 2.5(The love interest is definitely a weaker aspect of the film, Potter's mostly just there, but the part as written is pretty generic, and doesn't find some avenue to find something special within the normalcy either.)

No one else has a substantial role, though everyone is entirely fine in limited roles.

Lucas:

Ermey's performance is good but is much more the standard coach style performance, without really something that makes him specifically distinct in the role...though he's not ever anything less than effective. And to be fair to him, Bowerman gets a lot less screentime and focus in Prefontaine.

Calvin:

I actually almost watched it in theater, in its "generous" one showing one of the theaters gave it near me, unfortunately other things kept me from it, so I will definitely check it out sooner than later.

Anonymous:

I'll pass on that one.

Tahmeed:

I too enjoyed the 1/3rd season, if indeed ridiculous yet still compelling. Although I'd say Kreese's story I didn't find all that interesting, I thought he was fine but Hannah-Kim and C.S. Lee both pretty underwhelming and generic...I think they needed a truly charismatic actor if they wanted a late arrival to in anyway challenge Thomas Ian Griffith's high bar as the best antagonist of the series....I mean Michael Ironside and Walton Goggins as the evil school security guys from The Next Karate Kid ought to be around somewhere...

And I'd agree List would be MVP from this portion.

Perfectionist:

My feelings towards Harris are unchanged.

Ytrewq:

I haven't seen it in 20 years, but as I recall, far from Watts's finest hour, though I don't think she was bad just kind of working within a repetitive role, and the one thing I do recall is Cox's being pretty good in his final scene. But I have not desire to watch the film the again.

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis and guys: Did you watch the 1999 Oscars? If yes tell us what you thought of the show, the list of nominees and winners, and even Elia Kazan's Honorary Oscar.

I saw it on a VHS tape recorded by a friend. In my opinion, it's pretty clear that the Academy was obsessed with replicating the previous year's ceremony with high ratings and also with the chance of finishing big before 2000. Unfortunately, all that ambition backfired.
Goldberg as host was ok, although she was better in previous editions.
The selection of nominees for best picture was balanced as in the previous year with films: Miramax (Shakespeare and Life is Beautiful), Oscar-bait (Elizabeth), blockbuster (Private Ryan) and the Louis' favorite (Red Line).
It's unfortunate that the winners were so unlucky because of Weinstein's influence. Private Ryan would have been a more satisfying choice. Coburn is the most notable the night because he is the last unexpected winner in the major categories.
Regarding Kazan, I think he is the only person honored at the ceremony who would work better at the Governors Awards. If the Academy had waited a year to celebrate Stanley Donen, the night certainly wouldn't have been so bitter.

Tony Kim said...

Shaggy: The Truman Show being in the top 5 would've made it a much more interesting, varied lineup overall. As for Kazan, they needn't necessarily have gone with Donen; they could've picked almost any veteran with a good, non-divisive reputation in the industry if they truly wanted to avoid controversy. Though, a cynical part of me thinks that some of the powers-that-be went along with it despite knowing about the ruckus it could cause, for "no such thing as bad press"-type reasons.