Rufus Sewell did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying John Murdoch in Dark City.
Dark City offers an ideal companion piece to The Truman Show as an even more literal manufactured existence, and later the Matrix, which apparently cribbed some of the parts of its sets, and while both those films are superior due to greater directors at the helm, there are some fundamental elements of this film that are my favorite of any of these films.
One of these elements is Rufus Sewell in the lead role of John Murdoch, cast because he was then a basic unknown, and for all of us now, basically still feels like an unknown here because it's such a different performance than he would become known for, the evil British guy. He's neither British nor evil here, in fact one could argue his character is about to be programmed to be the typical Rufus Sewell role before waking up when he wasn't supposed to. Anyway, Sewell gives my favorite lead performance of the three men in the crafted reality films, because he is the most truly just average guy out of any of the performances. Compared to say Keanu Reeves who will always be Keanu Reeves to a certain extent, or even Jim Carrey, who severely downplays his Carreyisms but still brings aspects of his known presence to that role. Sewell rather attempts to portray how a completely normal man would find himself suddenly in a room where he has no memory of how he got there, or even who he is, only picking up clues along the way. Sewell is terrific in the role in the way he indeed just brings us into his mental space and every moment in the opening sequence Sewell doesn't waste. He brings the sudden fear fittingly when he finds a dead woman in his room, just as he finds the immediate anxiety of being completely lost in both place and mind. The most important element in Sewell's performance however is creating the sense of discovery of his John as he goes about trying to figure out who he is, from first picking up his surname from a hotel clerk, then later finding out his first from his wallet in an automat.
We follow John as he first escapes seemingly being set up to be a murderer, to finding himself back at "home" to his "wife" Emma (Jennifer Connelly). Where Sewell doesn't portray John as suddenly home, nor will he be suddenly home at any point within his performance, as he consistently creates the scenario within his performance. Creating reality of the reality breaking situation convincingly. Sewell's work is never of the simplicity of any element because in any circumstance John isn't just dealing with what is going on, he's also dealing with all the ideas around it. When he meets Emma there is an attempt for calm, for understanding for some kind of connection for a brief moment, but it isn't of two long living lovers without exception. Sewell shows him trying to understand the situation through her finding the comfort in her attempt to comfort in a way more so just as a person who cares more than necessarily fully his wife. Unfortunately any way of figuring things out are quickly dashed as he finds himself first on the run from the apparent law, Inspector Bumstead (William Hurt), and eventually from the alien men known as Strangers, who control this world, particularly one Mr. Hand (Richard O'Brien), and seek to capture John. Although John finds himself able to fight back against them with seemingly the same powers they have, Sewell again grounds every moment of this, even the worst bit of CGI of the film (that being the floating power bubbles), through his performance. He shows the discovery in the moment, just as he shows the fear of the strangers, but also the conviction of a man just trying to find the fundamental answers about his existence.
Sewell's performance progresses effectively in each sequence to show John slowly gaining his bearings in some respects while also getting more and more frustrated with others. Sewell naturally exudes this greater presence as the man finding his powers and becoming stronger within this world. While at the same time bringing such honesty in seeing the world get recreated by the strangers in front of his eyes, and showing a very necessary down to earth reaction to what is going on around him. Something that he makes fundamental in how any human would react when their very reality is being reshaped, but also very personal as he finds evidence of his fake memories. Sewell every time creates this very potent frustration of a man seeing his existence as a lie on this greater fundamental level which troubles him more completely. Although with moments of respite, and I think Sewell deserves so much credit in selling the romantic angle element, even though John himself realizes and admits that his relationship with Emma was crafted, but also the alleged affair of their relationship was also a lie. Sewell's moments though of John suggesting their current connection though as truth, is beautifully handled by him because he makes it such simple warmth not of this great love, but of a man finding something just through genuine human care. All of this leading to the finale, in which the actual confrontation between John and the strangers is sadly the weakest part of the film. In part because it focuses on the weakest CGI aspect of the film, also because John doesn't fight Mr. Hand, built up to be the main antagonist, instead oddly fights a different one. Anyway, as somewhat silly as the fight is, Sewell still stands firm in his selling of it, but more so he makes the most of the aftermath, as John recreates the world to be a better place for the humans. There's a wonderful calm and solace that Sewell brings in John, as John finds a kind of peace in making the world, and the fake dreams of his false memories into a reality. With a great moment being his final talk with Mr. Hand, that admonishes not with hate, but rather Sewell convincingly speaks the words with love. It's a terrific performance by Sewell which grounds the entire film, and it's a bit of shame that he was basically sentenced to be the John Murdoch, villain, the strangers wanted him to be for much of his career afterwards.
Dark City offers an ideal companion piece to The Truman Show as an even more literal manufactured existence, and later the Matrix, which apparently cribbed some of the parts of its sets, and while both those films are superior due to greater directors at the helm, there are some fundamental elements of this film that are my favorite of any of these films.
One of these elements is Rufus Sewell in the lead role of John Murdoch, cast because he was then a basic unknown, and for all of us now, basically still feels like an unknown here because it's such a different performance than he would become known for, the evil British guy. He's neither British nor evil here, in fact one could argue his character is about to be programmed to be the typical Rufus Sewell role before waking up when he wasn't supposed to. Anyway, Sewell gives my favorite lead performance of the three men in the crafted reality films, because he is the most truly just average guy out of any of the performances. Compared to say Keanu Reeves who will always be Keanu Reeves to a certain extent, or even Jim Carrey, who severely downplays his Carreyisms but still brings aspects of his known presence to that role. Sewell rather attempts to portray how a completely normal man would find himself suddenly in a room where he has no memory of how he got there, or even who he is, only picking up clues along the way. Sewell is terrific in the role in the way he indeed just brings us into his mental space and every moment in the opening sequence Sewell doesn't waste. He brings the sudden fear fittingly when he finds a dead woman in his room, just as he finds the immediate anxiety of being completely lost in both place and mind. The most important element in Sewell's performance however is creating the sense of discovery of his John as he goes about trying to figure out who he is, from first picking up his surname from a hotel clerk, then later finding out his first from his wallet in an automat.
We follow John as he first escapes seemingly being set up to be a murderer, to finding himself back at "home" to his "wife" Emma (Jennifer Connelly). Where Sewell doesn't portray John as suddenly home, nor will he be suddenly home at any point within his performance, as he consistently creates the scenario within his performance. Creating reality of the reality breaking situation convincingly. Sewell's work is never of the simplicity of any element because in any circumstance John isn't just dealing with what is going on, he's also dealing with all the ideas around it. When he meets Emma there is an attempt for calm, for understanding for some kind of connection for a brief moment, but it isn't of two long living lovers without exception. Sewell shows him trying to understand the situation through her finding the comfort in her attempt to comfort in a way more so just as a person who cares more than necessarily fully his wife. Unfortunately any way of figuring things out are quickly dashed as he finds himself first on the run from the apparent law, Inspector Bumstead (William Hurt), and eventually from the alien men known as Strangers, who control this world, particularly one Mr. Hand (Richard O'Brien), and seek to capture John. Although John finds himself able to fight back against them with seemingly the same powers they have, Sewell again grounds every moment of this, even the worst bit of CGI of the film (that being the floating power bubbles), through his performance. He shows the discovery in the moment, just as he shows the fear of the strangers, but also the conviction of a man just trying to find the fundamental answers about his existence.
Sewell's performance progresses effectively in each sequence to show John slowly gaining his bearings in some respects while also getting more and more frustrated with others. Sewell naturally exudes this greater presence as the man finding his powers and becoming stronger within this world. While at the same time bringing such honesty in seeing the world get recreated by the strangers in front of his eyes, and showing a very necessary down to earth reaction to what is going on around him. Something that he makes fundamental in how any human would react when their very reality is being reshaped, but also very personal as he finds evidence of his fake memories. Sewell every time creates this very potent frustration of a man seeing his existence as a lie on this greater fundamental level which troubles him more completely. Although with moments of respite, and I think Sewell deserves so much credit in selling the romantic angle element, even though John himself realizes and admits that his relationship with Emma was crafted, but also the alleged affair of their relationship was also a lie. Sewell's moments though of John suggesting their current connection though as truth, is beautifully handled by him because he makes it such simple warmth not of this great love, but of a man finding something just through genuine human care. All of this leading to the finale, in which the actual confrontation between John and the strangers is sadly the weakest part of the film. In part because it focuses on the weakest CGI aspect of the film, also because John doesn't fight Mr. Hand, built up to be the main antagonist, instead oddly fights a different one. Anyway, as somewhat silly as the fight is, Sewell still stands firm in his selling of it, but more so he makes the most of the aftermath, as John recreates the world to be a better place for the humans. There's a wonderful calm and solace that Sewell brings in John, as John finds a kind of peace in making the world, and the fake dreams of his false memories into a reality. With a great moment being his final talk with Mr. Hand, that admonishes not with hate, but rather Sewell convincingly speaks the words with love. It's a terrific performance by Sewell which grounds the entire film, and it's a bit of shame that he was basically sentenced to be the John Murdoch, villain, the strangers wanted him to be for much of his career afterwards.
Kiefer Sutherland did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Daniel P. Schreber in Dark City.
To say that Kiefer Sutherland gives a strange performance here may be an understatement, though to be fair in a twisted sci-fi film noir, one can't exactly say there isn't at least some ground to work within in this rather overt approach. Sutherland is probably one of the most random actors, as he can give a good performance as readily as a bizarrely terrible one, and just really moves back and forth between such work in his career without really a consistency one way or the other. Sutherland very much just does his thing, so in a way there is no protection of his performance here that may be the bridge between some of his worst work and his best work, as he certainly is making many choices, theoretically baffling, but not quite baffling. Sutherland's character of Dr. Schreber is supposed to be strange, as this man working for the strangers who goes about helping them with their research on their stolen humans, and helps to implant memories and change their crafted reality for them. Sutherland moves around with a limp, his eyes never exactly open in what we'd describe as the "normal" way, every word he speaks is with a bit of a labored breath before or after it. He speaks with a strange fascination of every exposition related to doing the strangers work, albeit mixed in with this kind of admiring fear at the same time.
To say that Kiefer Sutherland gives a strange performance here may be an understatement, though to be fair in a twisted sci-fi film noir, one can't exactly say there isn't at least some ground to work within in this rather overt approach. Sutherland is probably one of the most random actors, as he can give a good performance as readily as a bizarrely terrible one, and just really moves back and forth between such work in his career without really a consistency one way or the other. Sutherland very much just does his thing, so in a way there is no protection of his performance here that may be the bridge between some of his worst work and his best work, as he certainly is making many choices, theoretically baffling, but not quite baffling. Sutherland's character of Dr. Schreber is supposed to be strange, as this man working for the strangers who goes about helping them with their research on their stolen humans, and helps to implant memories and change their crafted reality for them. Sutherland moves around with a limp, his eyes never exactly open in what we'd describe as the "normal" way, every word he speaks is with a bit of a labored breath before or after it. He speaks with a strange fascination of every exposition related to doing the strangers work, albeit mixed in with this kind of admiring fear at the same time.
If there's character type he seems to be replicating here, it is the many actors who played Renfield in Dracula adaptations, in this man kind of broken by his servitude to this dark menace. Sutherland certainly colors the exposition of his character as something else, and as much as so much he just needs to unload, he always grants character within it by showing the doctor's specific fascination with his own work, the stranger's work, but also the potential of John. It is a weird performance, but it is a weird character that is supposed to stand out as separate and not entirely fit. But, I'll actually say Sutherland's choices go beyond just being weird, even if he is most certainly that, and it does inform the reality of the character even beyond being a Renfield. As we discover the Dr. was chosen by the strangers for his expertise, and he explains he had to rid himself of everything except that expertise. In flashback, albeit briefly, we see Sutherland seem to be a more complete man except in this desperate state, against the now sort of broken servant he has become, and there is a strange logic to Sutherland's performance after all. This is reinforced through the ending of the film, where the doctor rather than going through the strangers plan to implant John with their consciousness, instead basically gives John an instant supercharge towards mastering his powers against the strangers. A sequence that again shows there is sense to Sutherland's performance, as we see the doctor in John's mind, as that much more complete man, a mentor even, and without all the strange physical manner of the doctor's brokenness, as he informs and encourages John to be ready to take on the strangers. Re-watching the film for the first time in nearly 25 years, this time I got what Sutherland was doing. It is a bizarre turn, though a bizarre turn that does grant a style bridging a gap between Peter Lorre in a film noir and perhaps Rudolf Klein-Rogge in a German expressionist film, in the middle of where Dark City sits in some ways, and where Sutherland finds an odd place, yet a place that I found captivating, if on the most precarious of edges most of the time.
53 comments:
Louis: Any other upgrades.
Louis: I'd recommend seeing his Charles II in future and I've heard he's great in The Man In The High Castle.
Louis: With regards to the Westerosi ruler ranking, you can include the claimants as well.
The fact that not even the British film industry did much with Sewell is a shame in my opinion.
Louis: Thoughts on this film's cinematography and production design.
Louis, your thoughts on Proyas' direction, and your thematic interpretation of the film?
Louis: Your cast and director for Japanese and Korean versions of The Secret in Their Eyes.
Luke: He’s indeed terrific in Man in the High Castle. Big fan of the show as a whole too, even if the resolution wasn’t everything it maybe could’ve been
They're both great. Sutherland is an easy 5 for me as I fully loved every bizarre choice of his.
Not to diverge the post's comments too much, but to all of the American members of this blog....things are heating up down there. I hope everyone stays safe.
Rest In Peace Shannon Doherty. You fought a good fight. No more pain. No more suffering.
RIP Shannon Doherty
R.I.P. Shannon Doherty and Shelley Duvall
Man, she truly fought for so long. Rest Easy Shannen Doherty.
Louis: Thoughts and MVP for House of the Dragon S02E05. Felt it was quite good as a fall-out episode, with D’Arcy terrific again (and MVP), with Smith, Mitchell and Collett not far behind.
Louis: Think Mirage kind of got away scot free in The Incredibles? Sure, she was horrified at the fact that Syndrome literally wanted to murder children, and later helped the Incredibles return to the city, but she was also complicit in Syndrome's murder of several supers, assuming she was with him ever since he became a villain.
*assuming she joined him when he became a villain
I saw Longlegs. For how hard it tries to be dark and cryptic, I don't think I've seen a more unfulfilling horror film in a while.
Monroe-2.5
Cage-2 (you know the thing has gone awry when in a role like this he feels like nothing)
Underwood-3 (just for the ending)
Witt-3
Shipka-2.5
Luke:
Everyone else is consistent.
Marcus:
Forgetting the character assassination stuff for Stannis and Daenerys related to their ridiculously hastened ends and also only consider anyone who was in the series for more than a few seconds, so no Jaehaerys or Aerys II.
Viserys Targaryen
Robert Baratheon
Rhaenyra Targaryen
Stannis Baratheon
Renly Baratheon
Daenerys Targaryen
Aegon II
Tommen Baratheon
Joffrey
Robb Stark
Balon Greyjoy
Euron Grejoy
Robb may seem low, but even Joffrey listened to his advisors better than Robb. And Viserys and Robert may seem high given the immediate civil wars afterwards, but both maintained peace in their time. And it was Ned who technically created the civil war, he could've gone home when Robert fired him. Viserys nearly stopped it as his last acts, though he probably should've pre-abdicated before his death to smooth things over.
Anonymous:
Wolski does some wonderful compositions with the style very specifically of the neo noir. Emphasizing of course artificial light that crafts an off-putting quality, though not ugly, that emphasizes the imperfect reality of the piece. Combined with the artful way of using the space again in a very much a noir way, where it breathes the style beautifully throughout.
The production design is the highlight of the film in crafting this strange anachronistic world of times and places, merged into a singular creature, if also not that creature. Some ideas of basically memories put together in a way that is imperfect that creates its own distinct life that manages to be sci-fi, fantasy and a period piece so brilliantly. Combined with that is the world of the strangers as the cold calculation, and industry of just a machine making the faulty world above.
Tony:
Proyas's direction is mixed, but frequently on point. His aesthetic is fairly great here again in creating this film noir that becomes more twisted in styles and blends those ideas in his visual choices rather effectively. His use of CGI though is an example of mixed, because the more subtle, or even big subtle, it's great use such as the buildings shifting or when reality shifts. But at the same time the tuning bubbles were not the best choice particularly when he ends up over using it in the climax. There's also just some moments within scenes that kind of slightly break the reality just a bit as maybe it is a hint of just an idea not quite being there or just slightly over the top. The strangers while not terrible, I think border on just more comic villainy than genuinely scary creatures, and I think the latter would've been more effective. BUT the way he keeps the human element in John's story, giving moments of the false memories, but also the real connection. Giving time for the actors to explore moments, that is all great choices on his part. When Proyas is on, which is most of the time, it's terrific balance of style with thematic and character moments, when he's off, it's a little odd and more like something from Knowing.
Thematically I think more than anything it is about the unreliable nature of memory, and basically to try to conceive of a person's life purely by memory is kind of a faulty way given memory can be skewed or entirely lost or even faked even in our reality. And instead it's about what becomes the real truth, which is the less tangible, or at least specific nature of human connection that overrides and overpowers that memory in a way.
8000's:
Directed by Takeshi Kitano
Benjamin: Hiroyuki Sanada
Irene: Rie Miyazawa
Ricardo: Yôsuke Kubozuka
Pablo: Takeshi Kitano
Isidiro: Masaki Okada
Directed by Park Chan-wook:
Benjamin: Lee Byung-hun
Irene: Lee Young-ae
Ricardo: Park Hae-il
Pablo: Kim Roi-ha
Isidiro: Ha Jung-woo
8000's:
I mean theoretically sure, but given she was trying to redeem herself, it would seem cruel for an Omnidroid to suddenly fall on her or something.
Tahmeed:
I would agree, I liked how it kind of was getting into the nature of power on all fronts given Daemon, Alicent and Rhaenyra all have to contend with the limits of their powers in different ways and seeing how each reacts from it kind of reflects their nature as people aka Rhaenyra handles it the best. Though almost everyone was on point again, except Mizuno (though that's a broken record at this point), but again have to go with D'Arcy who just is so captivating with every second of screentime, and I think excels in showing the humanity of Rhaenyra, never simplifying her into just the perfect queen.
Well I certainly liked Longlegs more than Ytrewq, though it is a lot like Maxxxine in that the aesthetic is far greater than the screenplay, though the screenplay here is far better than Maxxxine's...but most screenplays are. At least though there is a mystery that is built up to and solved, even if there's more than a few holes (one that particularly irked me was the depiction of a psychiatric ward's visiting policy), and the main character has any kind of a personal journay even if it is a bit of an imperfect and a thin one at times. Still found the aesthetic frequently carried it effectively, even if its obvious influences, like Seven, Silence of the Lambs and ESPECIALLY Cure, are worn on the sleeve, I still found it mostly compelling and fairly creepy at times. EXCEPT its big selling point in Cage's performance, I have to be honest, and I say this as someone who typically likes Cage, I found him kind of silly here and any moment he showed up the tension immediately left the film as I found him more comical than unnerving.
Monroe - 4
Cage - 2
Underwood - 3.5
Witt - 4.5
Shipka - 4
“Cage - 2”
I won’t lie; based on the premise/concept, I thought it’d be “Saving Cage” instead.
Louis: Well, it's not like I was rooting for her death or something. And yeah, that would have been needlessly cruel.
Also, think Edna feels guilt for the deaths of all those supers who met their fate because of their capes?
Haven't seen Longlegs, but I will say it is exhausting that whenever there's a new Cage leading turn, people are either surprised that he's actually talented, or they try to force the wrong idea that he was 'a bad actor all along.'
Bryan:
Yeah, sounded promising but when I'm laughing when I should be in terror, there's a bit of a problem. I'm sure there will be some that say this was intentional and he wasn't supposed to be scary...but I can't agree with that given the film's aggressively serious tone.
8000's:
No, as I think those costumes were probably a rival superhero stylist, as it feels like less a warning based on one's own mistakes and more of a "what are you stupid?" type of description.
All that hype just for a 2 rating.
Witt getting a 4.5 and the highest rating in the cast? Didn't see that coming.
I’m glad Cage is still getting work in high-profile films rather than solely toiling away in straight-to-digital dreck, though I suppose this one was just a whiff on his part.
Louis: Thoughts on this Cage interview? https://web.archive.org/web/20240709000647/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/nicolas-cage-is-still-evolving
Louis: Thoughts on the scene where Edna "cheers up" Helen and encourages her to find Bob.
Tony:
Cage is an interesting situation where if say Jared Leto talked the same exact words, one would find it eye roll worthy, but with Cage it somehow works, to the point I couldn't read his words without completely hearing Cage's voice in my head. And I wouldn't say I can go down every road with Cage's very unique personal logic, and I can see where he's coming from with enough that there is a strange captivating logic to his ways, including the description of his ways. To the point I even almost agree with him about his performance in Longlegs, although I would disagree in that there is too much of him and he does "look like rubber" (Somewhat literally), because they end up using him too much. Also funny to see the conversation specifically between him and Susan Orlean commenting on the meta nature of their conversation in context to Adaptation.
8000's:
Great moment, and where Edna was a gossip hound just a few moments before, you see the genuine fan quality of sorts with her tough love pep talk, as though drowning in her sorrows isn't something she can tolerate given she knows what she's capable of.
Louis: Could I have your thoughts on the direction of A Story of Floating Weeds, and your rating for Kōji Mitsui in it. While I really think the central romance of sorts needed a bit more development, I thought he was strong with what he had.
Louis: Are there any nonfiction books on filmmaking or film history that have been of interest to you?
Louis: Have you ever had a show or a film get lots of nominations that you technically didn't agree with on paper but still loved them because you loved the film or show so much that you were still happy with it?
I feel that with the Emmys right now, especially in regards to Only Murders in the Building getting 7 acting nominations lol (Matthew Broderick wtf).
Regarding the Emmys: Great to see Matt Berry finally nominated. Interesting that Slow Horses is so well-represented. I knew Downey was gonna be nominated, but I don't think he should have been.
Louis: Your thoughts on this scene https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3yq6vCjswaE
Louis thoughts on the Emmy nominations, and your rankings for the series, acting, directing and writing categories?
Louis, what'd you think of the Anora trailer?
Louis: Your 1940s cast & director for Dark City.
Tahmeed:
I have to admit don't remember super well, which isn't anything against the film, just given how many films I watch I sometimes forget even good ones I've seen.
RatedRStar:
Oppenheimer last year didn't need to be nominated for costumes or makeup...but I wasn't broken up about it either.
Anonymous:
An amusing scene that I recall some hating when it first came out because of the tension of the overall episode with this seeming a "waste of time", though it worked then, and worked now, in just creating the sort of thing Hector would do to stick it to the DEA a bit more, while doing all he really wanted to do which was to alert Gus to him.
Tony:
Making Movies
Something Like An Autobiography
The Disaster Artist
Hitchcock/Truffaut
Anonymous:
As I say every year, don't invest much in the Emmys so don't get disappointed by them. Will say I'm just glad Asano made it, though sorry to see The Curse completely blank (though truly not surprised except Stone missing again after also missing for Maniac) and the Sympathizer blank except Downey (which I knew was going to happen no matter what...which I'll try to pretend was only for the director and Claude).
Comedy Series:
1. The Bear (though comedy...)
2. Only Murders in the Building
3. Curb Your Enthusiasm
4. What We Do in The Shadows
Drama Series
1. Shogun
2. Slow Horses
3. Fallout
Comedy Actor:
1. Martin Short - Only Murders in the Building
2. Jeremy Allen White - The Bear
3. Steve Martin - Only Murders in the Building
4. Matt Berry - What We Do in the Shadows
5. Larry David - Curb Your Enthusiasm
Will say they were late on Berry, though he was funny last season it was hardly his best season, but still glad he was recognized.
Comedy Actress:
1. Ayo Edebiri - The Bear
2. Selena Gomez - Only Murders in the Building
Drama Actor:
1. Gary Oldman - Slow Horses
2. Hiroyuki Sanada - Shogun
3. Walton Goggins - Fallout
All terrific.
Comedy Supporting Actor:
1. Ebon Moss-Bachrach - The Bear
2. Paul Rudd - Only Murders in the Building
3. Lionel Boyce - The Bear
Comedy Supporting Actress:
1. Meryl Streep - Only Murders in the Building
2. Liza Colon-Zayas - The Bear
Drama Supporting Actor:
1. Tadanobu Asano - Shogun
2. Jack Lowden - Slow Horses (though supporting actor my foot)
3. Takehiro Hira - Shogun
Limited Series Actor:
1. Lamorne Morris - Fargo
2. Robert Downery Jr. - The Sympathizer
ALTHOUGH, if each series had one spot, Downey has Fred Nguyen Khan's and Morris has Sam Spruell's (I mean really how don't you go with Spruell from that season?).
Comedy Guest Actor:
1. Jon Bernthal - The Bear
2. Bob Odenkirk - The Bear
3. Will Poulter - The Bear
4. Matthew Broderick - Only Murders in the Building
Personally would've gone with James Caverly for Only Murders.
Comedy Guest Actress:
1. Jamie Lee Curtis - The Bear
2. Olivia Colman - The Bear
3. Da'Vine Joy Randolph - Only Murders in the Building
Drama Guest Actor:
1. Tracy Letts - Winning Time
2. Jonathan Pryce - Slow Horses
3. Nestor Carbonell - Shogun
Comedy Directing:
1. Fishes - The Bear
2. Honeydew - The Bear
Drama Directing:
1. Crimson Sky - Shogun
2. Bear L.A. - Winning Time
3. Strange Games - Slow Horses
Comedy Writing:
1. Fishes - The Bear
2. Pride Parade - What We Do in the Shadows
Drama Writing:
1. Crimson Sky - Shogun
2. Anjin - Shogun
3. Negotiating With Tigers - Slow Horses
4. The End - Fallout
Tony:
Looks fantastic, and certainly aesthetically looks like it could be Baker's most accomplished film at the very least, as he deals with another "fringe" situation though in a very different financial status than his last few. Definitely seems more like Red Rocket in terms of being overtly comedic if also certainly still dealing with a lot of serious elements, which is fine by me. Madison also looks most promising, certainly high on my most anticipated for the rest of the year.
Bryan:
Dark City 1940's directed by William Dieterle:
John Murdoch: Ray Milland
Inspector Bumstead: Humphrey Bogart
Dr. Schreber: Richard Widmark
Emma Murdoch: Ava Gardner
Mr. Hand: Boris Karloff
Mr. Book: Cedric Hardwicke
Mr. Wall: Peter Cushing
Detective Walenski: Thomas Mitchell
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is not a movie I or anybody i know asked for, and that trailer is not selling it to me either. I already fear two things: 1) that Jenna Ortega's character might be pretty annoying and 2) that that movie could be pure nostalgia bait
Re: Emmys - love the Shogun love, hate how RDJ is the sole rep for The Sympathizer, that is all.
And regarding recent stuff I've seen: loved Twisters, really liked (with reservations) The Acolyte, and LOVED Dìdi which I heartily recommend everyone on here watch when/if they get the chance - Joan Chen has a great real shot at a Best Supporting Actress nomination if Focus Features play their cards right.
RIP Bob Newhart
R.I.P. Bob Newhart
RIP Bob Newhart
RIP Bob Newhart
RIP Bob Newhart
Calvin: your ratings for the casts of Twisters, The Bikeriders and Didi?
I’ll add on Sewell that not only is he great on Man in the High Castle, but on The Diplomat as well. He’s also a lovely, if slightly uncomfortable, figure on Victoria.
Michael: He's terrific in Victoria as well, shame he's only in season 1 plus a guest appearance in 2.
RIP the legend Bob Newhart
RIP Bob Newhart
Post a Comment