Sunday, 5 November 2023

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 1958: Gunnar Björnstrand in The Magician

Gunnar Björnstrand did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Vergerus in The Magician. 

Frequent Bergman collaborator Gunnar Björnstrand plays the pivotal role, essentially the plot driving role, of Dr. Vergerus who is the minister of health whose intention is to investigate a theater troupe who claim to have supernatural abilities. Björnstrand's performance cuts through the film in his first scene where he is part of the inquest into the troupe. Björnstrand is commanding through the confidence of his demeanor, Björnstrand wielding a certain power of his intention as a man who is quite clear in his disbelief of the group. Björnstrand brings this certain self-satisfied humorous bent in his delivery. Björnstrand bemuses himself a bit with every line showing just how little the doctor perceives the group to himself. He's exuding disrespect, however Björnstrand is careful to emphasize the intelligence of the character. His manner and delivery is that of insight and of attack. Björnstrand even looks over the titular magician Dr. Vogler (Max von Sydow) physically as a doctor would with specific intention, but then in an instance showing his casual dismissal when he found no medical reason for the magician's claims of muteness. Björnstrand is captivating in this scene crafting real drama over every question and forcing the troupe to open themselves up to his questioning. Björnstrand creates with ease the ideal "antagonist" of sorts, setting up the man who seemingly cannot be tricked by this group and sees them as unquestionably below him in their claims. 

Dr. Vergerus's methods go beyond merely uncovering the lies of the troupe but seemingly breaking apart their very foundation, as we see in a later scene where he goes about asking questions late at night to Vogler's wife Manda (Ingrid Thulin), who is typically dressed as a man, however in the night removes this facade. Björnstrand is terrific in the scene of asking her more questions by portraying the whole scene with the obvious intention in his eyes and baited breath that the Dr. is obviously more than a little intrigued by the woman physically at the very least. Björnstrand becomes a hectoring villain in the moment as making this clear but his delivery towards her is still with constant attacks towards her existence and particularly to the husband's existence. Björnstrand though takes this moment further releasing a bit more direct passion beyond his confident disregard where the doctor reveals his lack of belief in anything other than reality, which where we see a bit more of seething venom in his voice. And Björnstrand reveals that this is more than just to prove them false, it is personal, and he makes it personal as his overtures towards Vogler's wife are directed with more than just flirtation. Leading eventually to Vogler physically manhandling Vergerus, and Björnstrand's portrayal is pitch perfect in his reaction showing the put down fear hidden by his pompous glee at seeing how his methods have gotten the mute magician to resort to physical violence.

The conflict reaches its climax as the troupe gives their performance, seemingly ending with the death of Vogler, to which Vergerus will perform the autopsy alone in a dark room. And suddenly the film turns towards Vergerus's perspective as essentially the "mark" fully for Vogler, as he faces a series of seemingly the supernatural as he attempts to go about his duty. Björnstrand is excellent in this scene by showing the doctor losing his confidence suddenly and now just being a man who must face potential supernatural all alone. There is a real power just in the complete change in the man who is now alone and without any sense of command to the situation. Björnstrand being incredibly effective by playing the doctor now as very much human who can be scared of the immediately unexplainable as eerie things begin to happen around him. Björnstrand portrays each moment of the doctor as he begins to silently exhibit doubt as one bit of haunting after another occurs around him. Björnstrand powerfully, presenting this attempt at the man trying to hold it together yet with each new element of the haunting, reacts naturally as a man being gripped in fear as each event becomes more intense. Björnstrand along with Bergman, and a bit Sydow, building the tension magnificently, and Björnstrand wholly earning this transformation of the completely confident non-believer being terrified by seemingly a resurrected corpse in front of him. When the truth is revealed as it being an elaborate ruse, Björnstrand closes his performance effectively by crafting a balance between the aggressively confident man before, now with a bit of bitterness for the trick, but he brings just enough modesty to his work to show that as much as Vergerus wouldn't like to admit he did learn something from it all. For my measure, this is film is at its best whenever Björnstrand is onscreen, as it then when the film focuses on its most compelling element, of this battle of the mind between the charlatan and skeptic.

22 comments:

Oliver Menard said...

Louis: Now that you've seen more Ozu and Kobayashi films, what are your top 10 Japanese directors?

Louis Morgan said...

Oliver:

1. Akira Kurosawa
2. Hayao Miyazaki
3. Masaki Kobayashi
4. Kenji Mizoguchi
5. Yasujirō Ozu
6. Isao Takahata
7. Hiroshi Teshigahara
8. Hirokazu Kore-eda
9. Shōhei Imamura
10. Satoshi Kon

BRAZINTERMA said...

Hello Louis and folks!
Let's talk about some 1958 movie translations in non-English speaking countries. The names that were in Brazil were:

Vertigo = A Falling Body
Touch of Evil = The Mark of Evil
Murder By Contract = Deadly Trap
Run Silent, Run Deep = The Sea is Our Tomb
Home Before Dark = The Right to Be Happy
Defiant Ones = Chained
Auntie Mame = The Woman of the Century
Separate Tables = Separate Lives
Big Country = From Ground Men Are Born
Some Came Running = God Knows How Much I Loved
Teacher's Pet = A Teacher's Love
Lonelyhearts = For a Little Love
The Sheepman = The Irresistible Outsider
Cowboy = How a Brave is Born
Houseboat = Brunette Temptation
The Horse’s Mouth = Genius Madness
The Young Lions = The Vanquished Gods
Tom Thumb = Little Thumb
Bell Book and Candle = Love Spell
Big Deal on Madonna Street = The Eternal Unknowns
The Magician = The Face
Brink of Life = No Threshold of Life
The Lineup = The Savage Sadist
South Pacific = To the South Pacific
No Time for Sergeants = This Sergeant is Dead
Ice Cold in Alex = Under the African Sun
Dunkirk = The Drama of Dunkirk
A Night to Remember = Only God As Witness
The Bravados = Stigma of Cruelty
The Long, Hot Summer = The Soul Merchant
A Time to Love and a Time to Die = Love and Die
The Blob = The Killer Bubble
The Fly = The White Head Fly
King Creole = Bloody Ballad
Thunder Road = The Law of the Mountain

Shaggy Rogers said...

Louis: Could you add Alexander Knox (None Shall Escape and Wilson) and Gary Cooper (Ball of Fire and Man of the West) to your nominations page.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: On your nominations page, Rockwell, Cage and Foster need to be 6th, 8th and 9th respectively for 2009 Lead Actor.

Luke Higham said...

And Michael Sheen needs to be removed as well as PSH for Mary and Max.

Matt Mustin said...

Louis: What are your overall thoughts on Michael Mann as a filmmaker? His fans online are quite enthusiastic to say the least.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on this scene from House of the Dragon?

https://youtu.be/V0_Qi_7SG14?si=TaK-Hg6Zr0VwvUED

Robert MacFarlane said...

Matt: His fanbase fucking sucks and I hate them all.

Tony Kim said...

Louis, if you don't mind a long read, your thoughts on this profile? https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/11/13/ridley-scott-director-profile

8000S said...

Louis: Your thoughts on "The Dover Boys at Pimento University".

Anonymous said...

Louis: your new rating for Cara Williams in The Defiant Ones?

Louis Morgan said...

Matt:

There's only one filmmaker I can think of that has a more rabid base, who shall go unnamed, however Mann has at least made several great films, unlike another filmmaker whose talent is absurdly overblown by that fan base. I am slightly unseen for Mann on the whole, but in a way that benefits him. I haven't seen Blackhat (though called a masterpiece by some, I imagine that rabid fan base), the Keep or Miam Vice, which are all typically seen as his worst films. Although I have seen Ali, though that one falls into the bad in a way that I struggle to remember it is a Mann film and not just some disposable biopic of any filmmaker you might name, however from what I've seen that is an outlier, again from what I've seen. The second worst of his I've seen is Public Enemies, and that's a case of one terrible choice in the overt digital and a script that wasn't quite up to snuff, which happens sometimes. The rest of his work I do think is interesting, though Heat remains a film I like, but since I don't love it, it is considered a blight against the gods of cinema by some. But hey I will always praise the similarly minded and stylized Thief, Collateral and Manhunter. All of these films I think speak much to Mann's writing and his directing. In terms of directing, Mann at his best cultivates a stylized realism, which is strange hypocrisy. Where Mann purposefully often chooses naturalistic lighting, moments of the rudimentary to emphasize, and often settings that feel lived in or just are in fact lived in. But mixed in that is with the precision of style, with moments of very specific lighting that are "accidental" which are extremely vibrant and eye-catching but don't break the illusion. His action is sleek and again stylized, however again, at his best, are very overt, albeit again don't break the style instead wonderfully enliven the approach. In terms of a writer, Mann's specialty is the man behind the crime, which is often the psychology, but also the day to day existence of it, which we see in almost all his best films. The character study being essential and weaved in any around a plot typically with specific forward momentum. And in the case of The Insider, I think he has an exception, of seeing that his style could be adaptable both in terms of the writing and direction, to create a captivating version of the procedural. A film that isn't a Mann in film in some ways, but also absolutely is a Mann film. So I have to admit, Mann is a great filmmaker, but not a flawless or faultless one. He can make questionable choices, even bad ones, but he questionably has a distinct voice, which when he finds it in the right way, he's one of the best.

Tony:

Not too surprising to read that Scott is bullish on the flaws of his earlier films, and perhaps that speaks in part to his inconsistency as a filmmaker, since he assumes he's always right. Otherwise the Logan Roy comparisons noted so freely, also aren't too surprising, right down to his manner in interviews, though I'd say the difference is Scott clearly has unmistakable passion for his stories, even if his choices to tell them don't always make perfect sense, even admitted by himself in a way.

Tahmeed:

Fantastic scene in terms of creating the conflict between the two as neither are completely right nor wrong, and you see just how far the divide has become between the former friends at this point. But behind it all the lack of decisiveness in Viserys is the true culprit, as he barely acknowledges anyone other than his daughter, with his "duty" children therefore favors his daughter over his wife and in turn helping neither of them by fostering the bitterness, even if it is all him just trying to always make the most immediate peace.

8000's:

Again I don't believe I ever watched it.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I've seen Miami Vice. Every apologist trying to spin that one as a misunderstood masterpiece can eat me. I don't even agree with the praise for the cinematography, I thought it was fugly.

Marcus said...

Louis: What are some performances that you think the public considers an actor's best, that you personally disagree with? And could you make another list for directors?

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Your thoughts on The Old Man And The Sea (1999).
youtube.com/watch?v=W5ih1IRIRxI&pp=ygUXdGhlIG9sZCBtYW4gYW5kIHRoZSBzZWE%3D

8000S said...

Louis: Thoughts on Gunnar Fischer's work in The Magician.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Could I have your thoughts on Pep Guardiola's appearance in Ted Lasso, and also this bit involving Ted and Jose Mourinho?

https://youtu.be/eiUBRjTGUSY?si=7kNm-R6l8h1xun4b

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Whenever you have any time to spare, you don't mind if I suggest animated shorts to watch. I would like to get some in-depth thoughts on the Wallace and Gromit shorts for example.

Once every few days I'll pick a 20+ minute short or 2 10 minutes or less.

Mitchell Murray said...

hey everyone!

Throwing out a question for my animation blog...I was thinking about looking at some Anime openings in depth. Anyone have particular suggestions that might be interesting? It could be the song, the editing choices, foreshadowing, etc..

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on the direction of The Curse Of The Were-Rabbit. Thoughts on the Church meeting scene.

Louis Morgan said...

Marcus:

Robin Williams (Good Will Hunting/Insomnia)
Ed Harris (The Truman Show/A History of Violence)
Dustin Hoffman (Rain Man/Midnight Cowboy)
Geoffrey Rush (Shine/The Life and Death of Peter Sellers)
Sean Penn (Mystic River/The Thin Red Line)
Natalie Portman (Black Swan/Jackie)
Tom Hanks (Forrest Hump/Captain Phillips)
Jack Lemmon (Some Like it Hot or The Apartment/Save the Tiger)
Marcello Mastroianni (8 1/2/Divorce Italian Style)
Donna Reed (From Here To Eternity/It's A Wonderful Life)

Tony & Luke:

I appreciate your guy's interest in my perspective on such shorts, but I don't think I want to open those flood gates regarding shorts I haven't seen right at the moment. Maybe ask again during the break period.

8000's:

Exceptionally moody work, as to be expected with Bergman, and maybe not his best, but splendid in its own right. The scenes of leading to the house, are filled with such atmosphere as they emphasize the blacks against the light that grants the film a mystic quality to it. Contrasting that are some interior moments where they're well shot and well lit though more straightforward in that sense. Until the final confrontation scene between the two, where he and Bergman, pull out all the stops to do full on horror scene with the extreme angles, particularly dynamic lighting and just the intensity of the work.

Tahmeed:

A nice quick bit where he's just essentially Ted as well.

Got a chuckle out of the Apnea bit, and the general dead pan work, which altogether decent against the constant enthusiasm of Ted's end.