Saturday, 27 March 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2020: Delroy Lindo in Da 5 Bloods

Delroy Lindo did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite winning several critics awards and being nominated for Critics Choice, for portraying Paul in Da 5 Bloods. 

Spike Lee's Da 5 Bloods ostensibly is about 4 African American Vietnam vets returning to Vietnam to find gold they buried long ago. The film bites off essentially a buffet in its broaching of the subject, however I think much of its failings, though its not a bad film, is in its approach at making basically an Edward Zwick style film, that is an important subject funneled through an action movie. This isn't done particularly well where the two sides of the film clash more so than naturally merge into the intended digestible message movie it wishes to be. 

The one element of the film that rather glides through its weaknesses is found within longtime Spike Lee collaborator Delroy Lindo, as one of the four vets. The character is quite frankly one of the most complex that Lee has written, this as even the character features obvious political views that are not Lee's own, and Lee doesn't use this simply as just a straw man to be burned down. This rather is an honest exploration of this man who has lived a hard life and there's just a whole lot to him. So with that we get Delroy Lindo who we open up to in really his better places in the story as he's meeting up with his old platoon mates Otis (Clarke Peters), Eddie (Norm Lewis) and Melvin (Isiah Whitlock Jr.). Lindo is a potent performer to begin with, the man just has a strong presence unto himself, certainly aided in that regard by his considerable height. Now this first scene between the men effectively establishes their history and camaraderie between them. They have the right sort of weathered kind of interactions where you feel the years that have gone on between each of them that creates the right sense of time and experience shared together. Lindo is even the standout in this as his performance is able to balance this sense of friendship while also conveying the innate state of Paul. This as they are speaking to each other, when they occasionally get teasing, there is enough of a joke in these interactions however Lindo's reactions are of genuine hostility even if a bit briefly. There's an effective tension that Lindo shows even within his friends that when they push him he will push back. These small moments work in showing the man who is holding a whole lot intensity inside of himself all at once. 

We follow the men then as they are prepping for their mission of sorts. This with moments of the men talking about the politics of the past and the present. This with Paul expressing his own difficult situation while also speaking Pro-Trump sentiments. Lindo's delivery of this is really essential as he propositions the meaning within Paul's views as very upfront and unapologetic even when the other men quickly question them on him. In this he shows Paul's manner which is to face any issue he feels he has with a particularly aggressive streak that Lindo brilliantly plays. This as he doesn't make it one note, as I think in the wrong hands the part could of teetered into. Rather Lindo shows this manner of kind of attack to his problems that is inherent in the man. He speaks his views, but he doesn't yell them. He delivers them as directly as possible and even faces his friends' backlash in a reaction of basically "take it or leave it". Within these moments we also begin to see the sides of specifically associated with the war that begin to haunt him, such as a boy likely injured by a landmine asking for money from the group. Lindo's reactions has an innate darkness that seems to come across his face, a man instantly remarking on some old, very painful memories, as he sees the boy and instantly wants to avoid the thought by ignoring the boy best he can. Of course the expedition would not be complete without the sudden appearance of Paul's son, David (Jonathan Majors), whom makes the whole situation all the more complicated for Paul, as their relationship naturally isn't a simple or an easy one. 

Now initially we come into this relationship with an extra innate tension as David wants on in the plan to find the gold, and the initial negotiation with the four men is a great one for Lindo in creating the starting point for their relationship which is a complex one. This as we go from Lindo projecting a perpetually antagonistic father in the negotiations however when one of the other men threatens David, Paul's immediate reaction to threaten the man back for threatening his son is made wholly natural by Lindo. This in suggesting this immediate defensiveness of a protective father just as we see the obvious distance between the two as well. The men begin the initial journey into the country towards their destination, we have a fantastic moment for Lindo were a Vietnamese merchant continually pesters Paul. We again see that darkness within the reaction to the man, where Lindo creates such a sense of a painful burden within Paul. There is an anger, but also the sense of Paul not wanting to face the pain even as he suffers from it. Lindo remarkably realizing this pressure within the man until the man pushes him into a full explosion of anger. Lindo is amazing because he shows the hostility is never simple anger. There is such a sense of sadness within it of a man as much as he's lashing out at another human being, he is also just in this horrible anguish over the memories that seem to be flooding Paul in the moment. Lindo showing a man truly haunted by his experiences that in many ways go to help define the man as who he is, as Paul is so filled with hostility that is an innate feature of him. 
 
Where the film is sorta an ensemble at first, once the expedition begins, marked by a film ratio change, it becomes Lindo's show wholesale, and a the biggest reason why is, Delroy Lindo. Lindo just is effortlessly captivating here as we see the man charting both familiar and unfamiliar territory as the man goes back to the place that in so many ways made him. This in part we see his relationship with his son more, where Lindo is pretty astonishing that he can make the whiplash of this element not only work, it becomes rather potent, though more on that later. What we see though is this fascinating mix where we actually see Paul in a way become more so in his element at times. This as he navigates the jungle and moves through at the vanguard, Lindo's manner at times actually strangely becomes more relaxed. Lindo in this though shows the comfort of the man as he was as a soldier, despite being broken by it in so many ways. This isn't to say Lindo plays Paul as suddenly fixed even remotely, this as that tension within that man is something so innately woven into Paul's presence by Lindo. There's just that manner of a man ready and willing to attack at any point. This kind of hostility of Paul intending on there being some kind of ambush rather than even thinking there might be one. Still we get a moment of real reflection when the men find the gold, and the remains of their old leader "Stormin Normin" (Chadwick Boseman). Lindo is simply incredibly as he expresses so much in the moment of finding the remains. This in the moment of sorrow but also this truly powerful moment of reflection. In Lindo's reaction there is the sense of sadness, and some very personal pain, while also granting the sense of appreciation and even love for their old friend. 

The two finding the gold is really the beginning of the end. This as almost immediately Paul turns into Humphrey Bogart from The Treasure of Sierra Madre as gold sickness besets him. I'll say this aspect as written could've tripped up a lesser actor, however Lindo is so on point here that he even makes this work entirely within his portrayal. This as the protection of the gold, is in the same way we see Paul do anything, which is with this intensity and protective of his own spirit that is as vicious as it is formidable. There is a slight reprieve upon this though as the men find themselves in a mine field, which kills one of the four, and leaves David stuck on a land mine. Lindo is simply outstanding in this scene. This as we see both the best of the soldier and the father in the scene. This as Lindo creates really the sense of adrenaline as he sees his son is in danger. There is such focus in his eyes, but also such a sense of love actually in this moment. He absolutely conveys the deep concern in the situation just as he delivers every moment of the plan to save his son with this specific thought and command of a true leader.  The moment of rescue having such a palatable scene of catharsis as Paul embraces his son, and Lindo shows that Paul very much frees himself of all that bares on him just to care for his son. This being short-lived unfortunately as Paul immediately takes hostages of some humanitarians and demands everyone's loyalties as he tries to protect the gold. Again I think most, and probably should, fall right into a pit with this switch, yet it is a testament to the extraordinary nature of the performance that Lindo makes it work within character. This since he made this haywire instinct so natural, that this sudden shift in gear is honest, for Paul. 

Lindo becomes a proper terror in these moments as he tries to manage controlling the situation. This projecting such a potent menace as we see Paul very much as his worst. Lindo though playing it well with this sort of emotional heightened intensity of a man just stuck in the worst of tendencies. I'll admit I think this is where the film really gets messy, but the one anchor consistently is Lindo. He is absolutely captivating even when the film gets a little all over the place. This even when the group runs into Vietnamese robbers working for the "Bloods'" fence (who they told about the gold before the mission....for some reason). I kind of hate the scene with the almost exact line drop from Madre that is just awful. Lindo though remains fantastic though in the explosion of violence. This in showing Paul perhaps most in his element of killing the men, in this ferocity and conviction. At this point Lindo shows Paul very much giving into all of that pain which unleashes itself in this burning violence. This as even after the men successfully kill the attackers, Lindo shows the man as though he is in the war still trying to explain his plan to the others. Lindo speaking as a man lost in the past just as he is all to present with his use of violence. This leading eventually for Paul to go off on his own, while the rest of the group fends for themselves. This creates the most notable part of the film, against the least, in fact I greatly considered turning off the film on re-watch after Lindo's exit, though I stuck with it to still be left disappointed. Anyway what left no disappointment is when we see Paul wandering in the jungle directly facing the camera and rambling.
 
Lindo is extraordinary in this scene as we see the man so compelling as a man lost to all his memories and pains just overwhelming. Lindo's eyes filled with so much madness and just inability to contain it. Paul being haunted by everything and lost in everything. This is only exacerbated as he is bitten by a snake and loses his gold. Lindo makes the madness that besets the man absolutely tangible and so very powerful. He is phenomenal as he manages to make the mess of the man speak so much to everything all at once. This as every bit of his baggage, from his son, to the war, to his whole life, and perhaps most importantly his guilt involving Norman. Where we learn from a flashback that Paul accidentally killed his friend during a firefight. Paul though is comforted by a vision of Norman who forgives him as the act as only an accident. Just Lindo's tender reaction is absolutely heartbreaking in showing for just a moment the man is no longer with this hate filling his heart, and that pain that haunted for so long. This following as the man still mad from exhaustion, poison and everything else on him, though now Lindo expresses just the minor bit of comfort that reveals such a tragedy within the man's journey. This followed by his final chronological scene where Paul is essentially awaiting execution sings a ballad of love. Frankly it shouldn't work, but it does because Lindo makes it work. This as it is truly a poignant moment in Lindo's hands as he expresses finally only goodwill in the man, who has found his peace even at the end of so much conflict. Lindo is mesmerizing in every second of the last portion of his performance. It is astonishing work throughout, and it is to the film's mistake to continue 20 minutes after its only wholly compelling character exits. Lindo does have one more brief scene of a wholly sober Paul giving a comforting letter to his son. Without a question a well delivered scene by showing the man kind of outside of the spheres of his pain as well in just speaking his love for his son, and the best part of the film's stretched out (as typical for Lee) epilogue. Though I will bluntly say my reservations for the film overall only grew on re-watch, not a hint of that negativity infected my view of Lindo's work. He delivers a turn of sheer greatness, that I think might say everything the film is trying to say less effectively. This as its messages are spoken so unforgettably by Delroy Lindo's tragic portrait of a man who lived through a war but never survived it. 

64 comments:

Anonymous said...

Any rating changes? Also:
Can you please add "despite begin nominated for a gulden globe" to Patel's review?

Anonymous said...

I read your review on Mikhail Baryshnikov.
Have you seen him in anything else? Is he still that bad?

Luke Higham said...

Incredible work from Lindo. I would like Mikkelsen to be done last since Another Round is your film of the year.

Luke Higham said...

It's gonna be so close between Delroy and Mads for #1 in this lineup.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I'd up Boseman to a straight 4 (though his scenes do it harder now anyways), but everyone else is the same.

I could keep this Ghostbusters conversation going, but okay.

Unknown:

I don't think I have.

Matt Mustin said...

Amazing performance.

Michael McCarthy said...

This performance straight up shook me to my core. Such marvelously brave work from him, and it honestly kind of makes me remember the film itself as being better than it probably was.

Matt Mustin said...

Michael: Brave is the word. He showed us this man's soul.

Calvin Law said...

Spectacular performance in every regard.

Like Louis I have many issues with the film, notably the way the third act plays out and its depiction of the Vietnamese, but I have to give all the credit in the world to Lindo for tearing the screen apart beautifully every moment he’s up there, with a very tricky character - and to be honest, I have to give credit to Lee for the writing as despite the film’s flaws I do think the writing behind Paul is excellent and detailed.

Louis: your thoughts on The Man Standing Next overall? I thought it was good but could’ve been amazing, entirely agreed on Lee though. The man can do no wrong.

Calvin Law said...

Also we all looking forward to Jeymes Samuel’s The Harder They Fall? Lindo is playing Bass Reeves in that which is potentially a very juicy role.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: I haven't heard anything about that movie, but that is a great, great role for him.

Anonymous said...

Calvin: Maybe if that role is really amazing they could nominate him to make up for his snub here.

Calvin Law said...

Matt: I know right? Lindo, Jonathan Majors, Regina King, Lakeith Stanfield, Idris Elba - I am so hoping it ends up being amazing.

Robert MacFarlane said...

"You will *not* kill Paul."

Of all the snubs this year, this one hurt the most. A well-respected character actor gets the role of his lifetime, knocks it out of the park, gets a shit ton of buzz, and then is killed by recency bias. It's just not fucking fair.

Robert MacFarlane said...

By the way, I finally saw The Father, and uh... how the fuck am I even supposed to choose Best Actor now? It’s like choosing a favorite child!

Calvin Law said...

(evil voice) Do a tie.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: The only time I've ever really considered a tie is for 75 lead. How do you choose between Nicholson and Pacino?

Calvin Law said...

Matt: Pacino is my choice for that year but both performances are in my top 20 all-time, and their career bests. My only ties are the ones like Louis’ for films like Kiss of the Spider Woman where it makes sense cause both performances are so essential to one another.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: Pacino's probably my choice too, but it's a razor's edge. And I haven't seen Spider Woman yet, but that one makes sense.

Mitchell Murray said...

Yah, Lindo's brilliance here is hard to deny, and in my opinion, he is the single aspect of the film that achieves the greatness it was aiming for.

Also, I did finish the original "Naruto" series today, and while I might kick myself for saying this, I may have been too judgmental of it when I was younger. Don't get me wrong, I have a number of problems regarding it's pacing, story structure and characters, but at it's very best, it's still decently entertaining. I can certainly see it's mass appeal, even if I wasn't of the right age for it to completely work.

That being said...the ONLY reasons that I would venture onto "Shippuden" is if I have the time, and if I just ignore the filler.

Matt Mustin said...

Mitchell: I think the cinematography hits greatness too.

Mitchell Murray said...

Matt: You won't regret "Kiss of the Spider Woman" - it's Hurt's best nominated work, and I have him at a 4.5 for his three subsequent nods.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I have three ties for Actor:

1967: Mostel and Wilder in The Producers
1997: Crowe and Pearce in L.A. Confidential
2017: Kaluuya and Gosling

It’s too soon for me to do another tie, and a three-way one at that!

Calvin Law said...

Oh yeah, Crowe and Pearce would be a tie for me too, come to think of it. Can’t praise one performance without acknowledging the other.

Mitchell Murray said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Calvin Law said...

Louis and everyone: your top 10 performances in Spike Lee films? For me,

1. Denzel Washington in Malcolm X
2. Delroy Lindo in Da 5 Bloods
3. Ossie Davis in Do the Right Thing
4. Danny Aiello in Do the Right Thing
5. Delroy Lindo in Crooklyn
6. Denzel Washington in He Got Game
7. Samuel L. Jackson in Jungle Fever
8. Alfre Woodard in Crooklyn
9. John David Washington in Blackkklansman
10. Chadwick Boseman in Da 5 Bloods

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

The Man Standing Next I think suffers a bit in its opening, and perhaps from kind of made largely seemingly as a Korean perspective in the writing, this as it takes you awhile to catch up without knowing the history. Once you do though I thought it was a captivating political thriller with a fantastic build up to that climax which is pretty spectacular. I agree though the materials for a masterpiece seem right there, particularly with Lee in the lead (Don't know if he's personally done with western roles, I'd understand it if he was given the lame roles he was given, but I'd love to see him given an American role worthy of his talent.)

1. Delroy Lindo - Da 5 Bloods
2. Danny Aiello - Do The Right Thing
3. Samuel L. Jackson - Jungle Fever
4. Ossie Davis - Do The Right Thing
5. Delroy Lindo - Crooklyn
6. Ruby Dee - Jungle Fever
7. Denzel Washington - Malcolm X
8. Denzel Washington - Inside Man
9. Alfre Woodard - Crooklyn
10. Clive Owen - Inside Man

Matt:

Agreed regarding the cinematography, how Newton Thomas Sigel got nominated for Cherry over this at ASC is beyond me (as basically that film was reusing so many of the techniques he did here successfully...but poorly)

Calvin Law said...

Louis: I think he’s spoken quite negatively about the majority of his Hollywood experience so I do think he’s not going to return anytime soon (though I remember him having kind words about The Magnificent Seven set, I think him and Ethan Hawke got along very well).

And yeah the way Cherry changes aspect ratios in particular, is like the failed attempt at what he did here.

Glad to see Washington and Owen are now 4’s for Inside Man (I assume). What’s your rating and thoughts for Jodie Foster in the same film?

Anonymous said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the "Cookie full of arsenic" and "You're a national disgrace" scenes from Sweet Smell of Success.

Matt Mustin said...

The Father crushed me. Brilliant film, with an all-time great performance from Hopkins.

Hopkins-5(I'll be honest here, his rating was decided and secure 5 minutes in.)

Colman-5(Brilliant supporting work. Yes, definitely supporting. Even if she was in every scene, I'd call her supporting, because of the nature of the role and how she plays it. So powerful in the silences and never lets herself be overshadowed through just how honest she is.)

Sewell-3.5

Poots-3.5

Williams-4.5

Gatiss-4

Matt Mustin said...

(Yes, I said all-time great.)

Anonymous said...

Matt: is it your favourite of the BP nominees?

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: It's my favourite film of the year period right now, but I really, really haven't seen much. I'm working my way through 2020's films very slowly.

Matt Mustin said...

Also, let's just appreciate Frank Langella for a second, who played that role on Broadway. I haven't seen his take and how it compares to what Hopkins did, but just...think about having to live that part 8 times a week for several months.

Calvin Law said...

Judging by his work in Robot & Frank, I bet Langella was magnificent in the role too.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: I'm sure, he's a marvelous actor. Also, both Hopkins and Langella have played Nixon, which I didn't think about until I read it.

Matt Mustin said...

Also, SPOILERS FOR THE FATHER.....was the male nurse at the end abusing him?

Michael McCarthy said...

SUPER random idea that I haven’t been able to get out of my head all day...I want Kingsley Ben-Adir to be the next James Bond. Anyone care to join me in this campaign?

Michael McCarthy said...

But yeah as for the current subject...Hopkins and Lindo are both on SUCH another level for me. Like it feels weird giving them the same rating as other performances I give 5’s to this year.

Calvin Law said...

Michael: He'd be a phenomenal choice, actually.

Matt: Louis' review got me thinking about that...I would like to think otherwise but hauntingly that does seem to be the case.

Matt Mustin said...

Calvin: It makes the most sense to me. That wink.

Emi Grant said...

Matt: I also thought about that. I was a little confused initially whether it was him or Paul, but Louis' review and me re-watching the film yesterday confirms my suspicions. Particularly due to the genuine confusion from Sewell when the scene plays out for the second time.

Matt Mustin said...

Emi: Thank you for bringing that up, and actually thinking about that moment, I'm gonna raise Sewell to a 4.

Calvin Law said...

Emi: It could've been both. :(

Emi Grant said...

Calvin: I really want to believe Sewell's performance doesn't actively imply that, but it's totally plausible. Making it even sadder.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Yeah, Sewell plays his role as a frustrated man, but not necessarily an abusive one. Gatiss's natural presence on the other hand, almost always suggests a more sinister sort to me.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: The Man Standing Next was apparently based on a running serial in newspapers, though this comes up only on the Wikipedia page description and several reviews. It's not officially listed as an adapted film on IMDB though. So I think it could be in either Screenplay category for you but Original seems right if it hasn't been officially listed.

Thomas said...

Frank Langella is amazing in Starting Out In The Evening. He's in my top 5 for 2007 and he's one of the very few to win a critics award (Boston) against DDL.

Thomas said...

He should've been nominated for Starting Out In The Evening over Clooney in Michael Clayton.

Anonymous said...

My predictions for Louis's wins:
Picture: Another round.
Director: Thomas vinterberg.
Actor: Anthony Hopkins (but there is a chance mads could surprise).
Actress: Carey mulligan.
Supporting actor: Ben Mendelsohn.
Best supporting actress: Yuh-jung youn.
Bes original screenplay: Promising young woman.
Best adapted screenplay: The father.

Luke Higham said...

I think Raci will win Supporting Actor with Mendelsohn runner-up.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I think his work in Another Round is just about the same level as The Hunt for me though I give the latter the edge due to the church scene whereas Hopkins (My #2 though a re-watch could change that) has an even stronger feeling to me just from the review alone.

Luke Higham said...

If Mikkelsen were to win, his work would have to hit Louis on an incredibly personal level.

Calvin Law said...

After rewatching Hopkins on Friday, I really can't see him losing. I already thought he was amazing last time I watched it, but he hit me even harder this time.

I haven't seen Pusher II yet, but that seems like a role that could possibly nab Mikkelsen a win.

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: On Pusher II, I think another five for Mads would be nice.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Yeah, I think a performance would have to literally cure cancer in order to top Hopkins's work in The Father. Mikkelsen gave my favourite leading performance of the 2010s in The Hunt, and I just got that same feeling upon rewatching Hopkins.

Anonymous said...

Luke: Okay if Raci is indeed above Mendelsohn then my update top ten prediction for supporting actor is:
1. Raci
2. Mendelsohn
3. Laurie
4. Dennehy
5. Diggs
6. Hoult
7. Rylance
8. Groff
9. Whishaw
10. Jagger

Glenn said...

Luke, what are you most looking forward to about 2015.

Matt Mustin said...

Is 2015 the next year?

Luke Higham said...

Glenn: Ah 2015, the year of great Lead Actor performances in problematic films. I'm hoping for a new winner that would rank in the top 25 Lead Actor performances of the decade. Doesn't matter who it is, whether it's Plummer in Remember, Rohrig in Son Of Saul or Mortensen in Far From Men.

Matt: The 80s are next in the sequence then the 2010s.

Matt Mustin said...

Luke: I'll say right now that Plummer is fantastic but he is not Best of the Decade fantastic.

Luke Higham said...

Louis has mostly gone with the same order as he did with the alternates, so 2015 will be next since it came after 14.

Luke Higham said...

Matt: Well not top 20 anyway but I would like someone to get near it.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

The scene is excellent in showing the mutual moral duplicity of both men. Testament to Lancaster's performance that he makes the whole description of integrity as a foreign concept natural to the character of Hunsecker. I think you get a great duality as well this as Sidney is very much aware of his amoral character, where we get with Hunsecker some delusion about it, right to his disparaging remark to Sidney, when no one has more arsenic in him than him.

A fantastic scene that just one of the very best in the film, and just an incredible intro to a character. This as we see Hunsecker basically holding court with this sort of callous power, a sinister edge to everything he does even in his supposedly helpful suggestions. Every line of his an attack of a kind. Sidney in the scene being this Parasite, right to the brilliant direction of him on Hunsecker's back as though he is leech, or even the second head of hydra.

Calvin:

It would actually be higher in my adapted lineup than my original, so it is worth seeing if that is the case for the film.