Sunday, 7 February 2021

Alternate Best Actor 2020: Hugh Jackman in Bad Education

Hugh Jackman was nominated for an Emmy for portraying Frank Tassone in Bad Education.

Bad Education is an effectively darkly comic exploration of a pair of embezzlers at the top of a school district. 

I have to admit I've become slightly tired of the wait to the actual academy nomination announcement, something that has never happened before, however this year the wait is extended. So to kind of break the minutia a bit, and open up a new comments section, I thought I'd review one of the saved performances that is a bit of an outlier, and I know will not be nominated however I feel is worth talking about. This is as I have previously highly praised Hugh Jackman for his final turn as the Wolverine in Logan, in a deeply emotional work in his iconic role. That was a progression one could see, however his performance in Bad Education is something very different from him. Jackman is an actor I actually I think tends to be more charming outside of his films at times, with that side of his presence not always well exploited. Now, this performance is not a traditional charming leading turn in the least, however there is an element of that, and it is the element we open with as we meet his Frank Tassone as the superintendent of a highly lauded school district in Long Island. Jackman is wonderful in brandishing his innate charisma here as we see Frank go about his duties as superintendent, meeting with various committees, introducing this or that, and of course dealing with an upset parent. With each Jackman wields the "power" of the position with such an ease and grace. His manner as a man who has it all together, without a hint of worry.

We even see this as Frank entertains a student reporter, Rachel, with questions over the school's proposed sky-walk for the students. Jackman delivers his quick soundbite with a glee for being the man with answers, this going so far as to encourage Rachel to delve deeper. Jackman's manner as he encourages this isn't as though he exactly wants her to do so, rather in that smile we see a man saying exactly what he knows the party he's talking to wants to hear. Jackman showing Frank as the ideal superintendent who seems to just go about it all so easily, perhaps too easily. This as we see his seemingly biggest problem is his low carb diet, as we see in a moment between himself and his assistant superintendent/co-conspirator, Pam Gluckin (Allison Janney). The two are wonderful together as this quietly comedic pair. Their performances share what I think is essential as the two have this kind of shamelessness in their interaction. A shamelessness less as long time friends, but as though the two of them are mutually hiding their own intemperance by sharing it together. The two both showing this pair who seems to have an alarming degree of contentment that just suggests they must be guilty of something when within each other's company. This of course as the two of them have embezzled through construction projects like the sky bridge, however Pam gets caught first. 

Jackman is excellent in presenting the state of the man becoming all the more brazen as he attempts to deal with Pam's known crime as discretely as possible, supposedly to protect the school, but in fact to hide his own indiscretion. Jackman's fantastic as he shows Frank push his persuasive power all the more, this as he emphasizes such a seeming sincerity as he asks the board to think of the children. Jackman losing the levity in Frank's charisma, showing a man who is all business. Jackman creating the wonderful duplicity as he puts on the front of the man taking careful action, while there being that underlying sense of something else going on. This all the more evident when dealing with Pam, with the board around. This in his delivery bringing a proper speech of a man with a calm form trying to take care of business. This while though Jackman's eyes, that can only be seen by Pam, suggest an entirely different story. This as Jackman brings a real sense of threat in his eyes looking at her, now as a criminal firmly wanting his co-conspirator to take the blame, than any sort of proper public official. An even more wonderfully duplicitous moment coming as he addresses Pam's relative trying to blackmail Frank. Jackman's great here, almost treating this as a lesser threat, by maintaining his diplomatic jovial quality as his eyes and his words have a threatening subtext. Jackman again bringing such a quietly insidious quality that is striking and suggests that almost everything about the man just might be a facade. 

This in a sense is in some ways what Jackman's performance should've been more so in his work as Gary Hart in The Front Runner, however that film failed in seemingly having no thematic purpose. The untapped potential within that is realized here in Jackman's portrayal of a man who has been putting on a show for so long he doesn't really even know who he is exactly. We see this as the case as he is the man who talks about his dead wife, which Jackman speaks as though it is part of Frank's introduction, though he is in fact not one but two homosexual relationships. Although I think it is important note these are in themselves not insidious. In fact Jackman is quite good in portraying both as Frank almost being some kind of genuine earnestness in these moments of affection, however even these moments Jackman brings some degree of a guarded quality. This not being as an act of repression of his sexual desires, rather as a man who is still hiding something from both men, that being the relationship with the other man, but also Frank as this ardent liar who loves to live this life of lying. We see then as the evidence closes in on Frank, Jackman's performance is exceptional as he slowly reveals the image the man has created falling apart. When he goes to threaten the very reporter he encourage, suddenly Jackman shows a man struggling not to put on a threat, instead just genuinely threatening the girl, and no longer able to he hides himself with his fancy suits and face lifts. When Frank starts explaining the deficiencies to the board and to the school, Jackman shows now how hollow the man's charisma was all along. This as now the smile fails to be anything less than a mask, and the attempted professional delivery is just a phony display of nothingness. There's a brilliant moment, where the same upset parent comes with her son to try to give something back to Frank. Jackman is amazing in this scene. This with the facade straining within his face as there is nothing but a taut exhaustion flaring behind it. This before he bursts out against the kid and his mother, but what I love is Jackman doesn't play it as a straight anger. This as he rather shows the man trying to wield his his presentation of his himself as this great man while having this breakdown. Jackman is a magnificent mess as he becomes this grotesque state of the man trying to give an inspirational speech while also having a mental breakdown. Jackman beautifully realizing a man folding in on himself as he becomes nothing but lies. This is a brilliant performance by Hugh Jackman that works as a wonderful companion work to his other great performance in Logan. This as a counterpart as instead of a deeply emotional portrayal of a man facing a truth, we get different side of his range in his duplicitous portrayal of a man doing everything to avoid facing any truth. 

265 comments:

1 – 200 of 265   Newer›   Newest»
Luke Higham said...

Nice, has Janney gone up to a 4.5.

I'm glad you've gone this route, gives me alot of hope for a Patel review.

Luke Higham said...

And I'm pleased Jackman's up to 2 fives now. :)

Anonymous said...

So i guess you picked this performance since it wasn’t going to be nominated anyway? Lol if then i would like a review of daveed diggs and jonathan groff from hamilton.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Yes.

Anonymous:

If you read the review, that question is answered.

Anonymous said...

Lous what are your ratings and thoughts on jackman on the front runner? I don’t think you gave them before.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

I have.

Anonymous said...

Okay but just wondering where because you didn’t include him on your 2018 lead overall ranking.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: He did. He's #61

Anonymous said...

Oh i didn’t see that somehow lol.

Mitchell Murray said...

The point of Jackman having more charm outside of his film work is something I'm inclined to agree with; Seriously, the video where he calls out his interviewer as a former student is one of the most wholesome celebrity moments I've seen.

As to his performance in "Bad Education", I'd also have to agree with Louis' review. It's a terrifically observed portrayal of "superficial charisma", and a more layered turn than most of his early roles would've suggested.

Bryan L. said...

Anonymous: You can find his thoughts for The Front Runner in Bradley Cooper’s ASIB review.

Mitchell Murray said...

Bryan: I'd also note that's where you can find Louis' thoughts for Jason Momoa in "Aquaman", who is another performer - like Jackman - that has a lot more personal charm than many of his film roles reflect.

For myself, the old saying of "I'd have a beer with that guy" most definitely applies to Momoa.

Shaggy Rogers said...

A great performance worthy of 5, I only regret that it came from TV.
I look forward to Louis' assessments of Hamilton and Small Axe

Calvin Law said...

Excellent performance and I’m glad we’re getting some additional content, what a pleasant surprise. Great review and I hope Jackman continues to get roles like this.

Luke Higham said...

When Louis said he might do a review or two, I guess that 2nd review will be another lead performance from 2020, one where it's film & Leading actor went completely unrecognised and came out earlier in the year.

And it's definitely not Lindo.

Anonymous said...

Luke, you're referring to Mark Rylance aren't you.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke & Anonymous:

Sorry to quash speculation, but I reviewed Jackman here because I know I wanted to, but in any normal year, he'd be out of competition anyways. I had been planning to put him as an extra review when I got to alternate lead, but thought it just made sense to instead tackle him during this wait-time instead.

Mitchell Murray said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

Louis: That's OK, though I do wonder what that 2nd review is.

Emi Grant said...

I'm glad M. Night Shyamalan found the font of the Oldboy opening credits.

Luke Higham said...

I'm really looking forward to your thoughts on A Brighter Summer Day.

Anonymous said...

Luke, your thoughts on Jude Law in The New/Young Pope

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: A tremendous portrayal of a Machiavellian, power hungry figure. His best work to date by quite a distance though I wish he shared more scenes with John Malkovich (One of his best roles).

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: What possessed you to watch Me and Earl and the Dying Girl.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Excellent performance, and I agree with every word. I wonder if he would have been a major player in the awards race if it was an eligible release.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Ah Bryan, I see you've been snooping through my half-star ratings on Letterboxd.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: I was reading some 2015 posts awhile ago and saw that practically everyone on here bashed it. Was curious to see just how bad it was.

Curiosity defeated me.

Bryan L. said...

Robert: I will just have to take your word regarding Levinson Jrs’ films. I learned my lesson.

Bryan L. said...

(Although I am also curious about The Book of Hen-I need help.)

Robert MacFarlane said...

Give in, my child. Do not resist the darkness. Embrace it. Consume it. For soon, all shall fall to it.

(Also, I love seeing people's WTF reactions to this shit)

Calvin Law said...

Book of Henry is legitimately enjoyable to watch. Not for the right reasons, mind you.

Bryan L. said...

Robert: Aahhhhhhh.........fine you win. I’ll put Assassination Nation on the docket.

Robert MacFarlane said...

HehehehehehehahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAA HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

You next, Louis. Put Assassination Nation on your watchlist.

Calvin Law said...

Fine if everyone has to watch it I might have to cave into peer pressure.

*insert Clockwork orange gif*

Robert MacFarlane said...

*Colin Robinson voice*

I'm changing. I'm becoming something new. Something stronger.

Louis Morgan said...

Hmm...Why does it feel like I'm being asked to read the manuscript from In the Mouth of Madness.

Mitchell Murray said...

Before this comment is lost in the crowd, I'll ask it again: To anyone familiar with "My Hero Academia" and/or "Naruto", what would be your thoughts on this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVOUoIkdh0U

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mitchell: Seen it before, I guess it checks out. Not overly familiar with MHA, but I know enough.

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: Do you watch the show that fight is from IE Screwattack's "Death Battle"? If so, what are some of your favourite and least favourite episodes of theirs?

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

This review was an incredibly welcome surprise. I love Jackman's performance here, and I agree that this is the best use of his considerable real-life chsrisma.

Louis: Your top 20 Hugh Jackman acting moments?

Robert MacFarlane said...

Mitchell: Watched a few, not really my thing. Feel like I’ve outgrown anime on some level beyond the ones I have sentimental feelings for. I’m old and grumpy.

By the way guys, I finally watched What We Do in the Shadows and am totally in love with the series. It is even better than the movie, and also I want Matt Berry to narrate my life.

Michael McCarthy said...

BAT!

Calvin Law said...

https://cinema.usc.edu/events/event.cfm?id=59625

If anyone wants to check out The Father in advance there's this link you can apply for a reservation for a free screening link for tomorrow (9th February). Idk if it will actually work but I just applied for it and it seems like it went through with a confirmation.

Louis Morgan said...

Tahmeed:

Jackman:

1. "So this is What It Feels Like" - Logan
2. "There's water here" - Logan
3. Office Breakdown - Bad Education
4. Dismissing Pam - Bad Education
5. The truth of his trick - The Prestige
6. Speaking to Laura before the battle - Logan
7. Hearing About Caliban - Logan
8. Smiling Threat - Bad Education
9. "It wasn't me" - Logan
10. Not so veiled threat - Bad Education
11. Trying to explain himself - Bad Education
12. "How does he not know?" - The Prestige
13. Fake Audience - Bad Education
14. Trying to avoid responsibility - Logan
15. Water trick gone wrong - The Prestige
16. Before being arrested - Bad Education
17. Talking to Charles about the past - Logan
18. Screwed Up Trick - The Prestige
19. Further discrepancies - Bad Education
20. Initial conversation with Charles - Logan

Robert:

The name's Daytona, Jackie Daytona.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: I know his work in Les Miserables has diminished quite abit since you first saw it but what would be his best scene there.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Which characters in Musicals do you think Jackman would've been a great fit for that weren't Gaston.

Luke Higham said...

If you're watching it today, thoughts on A Brighter Summer Day and the cast.

Anonymous said...

Louis, would you consider doing writeups on your TV movie fives after you've covered all of the fives in Films.

Luke Higham said...

I would love a review of Ben Whishaw in Richard II.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of saw The Father.

That ending, damn it Hopkins, sorry Mads.

Tim said...

i missed the discussions in the past days, learning for an exam.

That said, on Close vs Coleman. First of all, Melissa McCarthy was better THAT'S RIGHT I SAID IT WHO WANTS A PIECE OF ME?!

Second, is the wife any good? i have been avoiding it, should i watch it just to be able to say something about Close, or is it not worth it?

Anonymous said...

Critics choice nominations were announced. And apart from news of the world and hillbilly elegy I am actually pretty okay with the nominations.

Anonymous said...

But mads should have been nominated over ben Affleck 100%

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I'd rather Affleck than Hanks.

Calvin Law said...

Critics Choice literally the most useless awards precursor, 8 nominees for Best Actor lmao

Luke Higham said...

Calvin: Couldn't agree more. It feels so anticlimactic to have them after Globes and SAG.

Mitchell Murray said...

Anonymous: To be honest, I'm surprised Affleck was even considered considering "The Way Back" was so early in the year.

That being said, I hear he's good in the film, and Affleck is someone I find myself supporting in his better performances. So if by some minor miracle his nomination goes any further, I won't be immediately opposed.

Calvin Law said...

Nah. Affleck was fine but in a year as strong as this, hell no.

Emi Grant said...

Those The Father snubs tho...

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: Would it have the same affect for you, then, as Redford getting in for 73?

Emi Grant said...

Also, since it's the Critic's Choice we're talking about and Sacha Baron Cohen is still the only one who got nominated for it, I'd think it's kind of fair to fully rule out anyone else from the cast making it.

Mitchell Murray said...

Emi: Now I'm just imaging an alternate universe where Stallone won supporting actor for "Creed", and Rylance is being viewed as the favourite for "TTOFC7".

Also, since I've actually seen the film now and he'll most likely be nominated, let me just say Boseman is a 3.5 for me in "Da 5 Bloods"; He's properly passionate and interesting in the role, but the film just doesn't utilize his character as much as one would think.

Calvin Law said...

Mitchell: I have no idea what you mean, I’m just saying Affleck doesn’t need to be nominated in a year where we have Boseman, Ahmed, Hopkins and Oldman as locks while Lindo, Yeun, Ben-Adir, Rahim are all vying for that fifth spot.

Calvin Law said...

I would say Critics Choice suggests Hanks might be in contention but honestly seeing as he’s missed both Globes and SAG and they seem to deferring all the attention to his co-star, I’ll garner that he was just ‘filler’ for that...seventh spot.

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: That's precisely what I mean...a fine leading performance getting in over a number of very strong ones.

Mitchell Murray said...

And to add to that further, Boseman and Oldman are both 4.5's for me for "Ma Rainey" and "Mank", respectively.

Louis Morgan said...

Regarding Critics choice, it was nice of them to release their long list Oscar predictions.

Luke:

"Valjean's Soliloquy"

Curly, Lancelot, Billy Flynn

Anonymous:

I'm just barely half way done with the bonus rounds so I won't be discussing future plans at this time.

Tim:

It's forgettable. It isn't terrible, but it's not good.

Emi Grant:

I wouldn't say it was all that snubbed. Hopkins/Colman/Editing/Adapted screenplay are its biggest plays and it got all 4.

It didn't get into picture, but it still has only 50 reviews on rotten-tomatoes, suggesting the whole body still might not have seen it. I think Sony Picture Classics put their focus on the HFPA and the actual industry precursors for the film, given its success with the Globes, SAG and likely (based on the long lists) BAFTA.

Boseman will win here, if Hopkins does compete, his road to victory is through (BAFTA, Globe).

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the reverse car-chase in Drive?

Bryan L. said...

Louis: ^And the build-up to it (Standard & Blanche walking to and leaving the pawn shop)^

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Well, rewatching Drive after three years hit me differently. Then again, I've been rewatching a lot of my all-time favorite films during the pandemic, and they've been a great comfort alongside Louis's reviews and the discussions we have. Just thought I'd put that out there.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Just a terrific build up within the scene by staying entirely with the driver. This as Refn just slowly adds it up, first in the mysterious black windowed car, to then the unexpected wait, which again really keeps you within the Driver's perspective as the time clicks, until the sudden and brutal death of Standard.

Tahmeed:

Well first I have to say, that means a lot.

As for the chase scene, just exceptional work of Refn doing just a
brilliant sort of classic chase scene. This Just with taut editing, fantastic sound design, and a clarity of the shots even as it maintains such a kinetic energy. This with such a excellent twist in the Driver's reverse trick, with just an absolutely amazing final shot in the passing flying car behind Christina Hendricks.

Anonymous said...

Any chance of sylvetser stallone going up to a 4 for rocky?

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Not impossible.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: your thoughts on the hospital march scene and the 'A Change is Gonna Come' sequence from Malcolm X?

Also, do you think Judas might make a bounce back with the BAFTAs, or do you think it has a chance of being just a Kaluuya vehicle this awards season?

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

The scene is very much emblematic of Lee's approach to the film which definitely seemed be framed as his epic (right down to the cameos like Peter Boyle's here), and perhaps one of the best in that sense, as the crowd very much shows essentially the might of Malcolm and himself as a General in Elijah Muhammad's army in that scene. This idea amplified by the score that grants a military style march, and Washington's performance at the end of the scene. The moment that is most impactful is that end as in a moment he turns a crowd into an army.

I mean any scene is going to be helped by Cooke's amazing song, and I mean there is an extra something with the context offered by "One Night In Miami" in a sense, as both men would be die by violence months from one another. The song resonating in every way though in the story of Malcolm, and a befitting elegy in the moment, and it is a beautifully rendered moment. This as for once I even like his dolly shot, which I'm often mixed on, but I do think works here as Malcolm moving towards his fate.

Although a side note, you get to see Giancarlo Esposito's early Gus chops, in the moment where he goes from the friendly manager of Los Pollos Hermanos giving Malcolm's daughter back her doll, before that smile fading to a killer's intent.

Regarding Judas and the Black Messiah, I doubt it bounces back too much with BAFTA because it wasn't nominated for director on the long-list. I think it could do a little extra than just Kaluuya (particularly the techs), to help sort of certify a win for him, but I don't think too much. I think the late rollout might've been a bit of a mistake, as people might've kind of settled on their overall favorites at this point making it harder to squeeze onto ballots.

Calvin Law said...

That's what I'm thinking too. Rare is the SUPER late rollout like Phantom Thread which does well at the Oscars. I think the decision wasn't great for the film's overall chances, but I'll wait till nomination day to see how this tactic plays off.

And did not notice that was Peter Boyle, that's cool. Agreed on Cooke's song too.

Robert MacFarlane said...

So I finally watched Da 5 Bloods.

Sorry Mads. Not this year.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Also, I think I liked Boseman in it more than you guys did. Mostly just for his last scene.

Calvin Law said...

Boseman definitely nails his last scene, which for my money is the best scene in the whole film (the third act as a whole did not sit well with me on rewatch but that is a brilliant scene).

Robert MacFarlane said...

I actually don’t have any real problems with the film’s climax or various tone shifts. Granted, I was warned ahead of time, so maybe I just got on its vibe a lot easier.

Calvin Law said...

Sadly it's those very issues which put Lindo 'only' at the 5th spot for me (I know, crazy). Sadly didn't think his film did his performance as much justice as my other four in my current lineup. Still, I think he is 100% deserving of a nomination.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Oh he’s my #1 and unless Yuen and Hopkins arise the dead, he’s staying there.

Anonymous said...

Well Robert, would you say it is fair to say that naturally Boseman's scene didn't hit as hard for those of us who watched the film in June?

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: For what it's worth, I'd give Lindo a very solid 4.5/verging on a 5, since I found his performance to be incredibly searing and intense even through the film's less assured sequences.

If the actual line up follows Louis' predictions, my ranking thus far would be as followed:

1) Lindo (4.5)
2) Boseman (4.5)
3) Oldman (4.5)

Matt Mustin said...

Mitchell: Anything less than a 5 for Lindo is ridiculous, I'm sorry.

Mitchell Murray said...

Matt: Well I've stated before that a lot of the performance I given 5's to we're initially 4.5s, so I don't feel my thoughts are "ridiculous", thank you.

Anonymous said...

Matt: Do you have to be so needlessly abrasive when it comes to the opinions of other people? I've noticed it quite a bit from you.

Emi Grant said...

(let's no go that direction, please. Let's get back at Lindo)


...Anyway, to me Lindo was pretty much the entire film as I wasn't nearly as entranced by anyone else as Lindo's character. I actively disliked several directions Da 5 Bloods went with (SPOILERS but weren't the LAMB volunteers the most obvious "yeah, they're gonna come back later on to betray you" characters ever?)

So, my favorite thing from the third act was spending more time with Lindo alone. His last two scenes are terrific and even if I also found the whole "you have to let me go" thing a little silly, it's also a strong scene for Boseman, who borders on a 4 for me. Lindo was such an easy 5 too.

Calvin Law said...

Yeah I'm probably in the slightly less negative side of this blog in terms of Da 5 Bloods overall and I have absolutely no question in giving Lindo a 5. It was an incredibly tricky and complex role (playing a character who's a Trump supporter in this current climate is SUCH a huge hurdle no matter what and even more so if you have to find a sympathetic angle). Thought he managed to do that all and some more.

Calvin Law said...

And Boseman's scene does hit harder on rewatch, though I'll admit his scenes in Ma Rainey's hit me even harder (though I will confess I probably like that film a lot more than most on here).

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

The second Boseman became a 5 for me in Ma Rainey was that first monologue, although I have to admit that his death made the ending more heartbreaking than I think it should have been.

Matt Mustin said...

Anonymous: I think you might be confusing me with someone else there, because I really don't do that often here. This one time being the exception, and I apologize, but still.

Matt Mustin said...

Tahmeed: That was the moment for me too.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: If it doesn't involve giving anything away about Diggs's performance, could I have your thoughts on both Cabinet Rap Battles from Hamilton?

Calvin Law said...

Boseman's first monologue solidified him as a 5 but his anguished beratement of God was what truly sold it as my runner-up for the year.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Boseman’s performance in Ma Rainey reminded me a lot of the other major August Wilson-penned leading man performance. Both he and Denzel are deliberately stagey, but they also combine their screen presences and personas into their approach and clearly revere the material. Boseman has a weaker play to work off of, but the way he presents Levee’s swagger, arrogance, and charm made me realize how special the performance was before the first monologue even hit. I’m more than fine if the Academy chooses him.

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: It's an interesting comparison to make considering they shared Viola Davis as a screen partner - far more in Washington's case, admittedly.

As someone who went into "Ma Rainey" completely blind, both of Boseman's monologues struck me as the film's highlights.

Mitchell Murray said...

Although I'm not quite as big about his "Da 5 Bloods" work as other people - mostly because of his limited screen time and focus - his "Ma Rainey" performance is most definitely a strong one, and a worthy final outing for someone who passed long before his time.

Michael McCarthy said...

Matt & Robert: Totally with you. There have been a bunch of great lead actor performances this year but Lindo is still far and away my favorite, it’s devastating that he’ll likely be snubbed. And yeah everyone has the right to their opinion but...I really can’t think of an argument against giving Lindo a 5.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Boseman's dominance of Ma Rainey is so apparent, that I'm surprised that most people (ie Gold Derby) aren't predicting that Mulligan will steamroll over Davis. I'm not all too familiar with the source material, but I was more than a little surprised that Davis is almost supporting in it.

Emi Grant said...

You guys think it's safe to say Mulligan currently has the best momentum for Best Actress?

Kirby's film underperformed in other areas, Ma Rainey feels more like Boseman's show, McDormand has already won twice and Andra Day who I feel has the best momentum for the fifth spot might just be a sole nominee.

Luke Higham said...

Emi: I think so. If she wins SAG it's game over.

Calvin Law said...

Yeah I do think Boseman, Mulligan and Baron Cohen all have the most momentum right now to win. Supporting Actress meanwhile remains an absolute clusterfuck.

Emi Grant said...

Calvin: In Colman I trust

Calvin Law said...

In anyone but Close I trust. I take back every bad thing I said about Mank and News of the World if they stop that nonsense from happening.

Robert MacFarlane said...

I actually think Bakalova could be a Marisa Tomei-styled win.

Calvin Law said...

Agreed. She’s getting in all the right places and has the hype.

Calvin Law said...

Also in my wishlist of impossibly awesome things to happen I want Han Ye-ri to pull a de Tavira and nab that 5th Actress spot if Minari overperforms. Having said that it’s a year away and best not to count my chickens before they hatch, so I’m filing that under ludicrous but awesome things that could never happen.

Anonymous said...

Louis what would be your top ten performances in sitcoms?

Bryan L. said...

*Fondly remembers about Parasite’s wins from exactly a year ago today*

That was a good night.

Anonymous said...

Louis have your lead/supporting actor predictions changed since your New Year's one?

Louis Morgan said...

Emi Grant:

It's who I am predicting till further notice.

Tahmeed:

I'll just say "wait for it".

Anonymous:

1. Glenn Howerton - It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia
2. Jackie Gleason - The Honeymooners
3. Jason Alexander - Seinfeld
4. Michael Richards - Seinfeld
5. Art Carney - The Honeymooners
6. Zach Woods - Silicon Valley
7. Will Arnett - Arrested Development
8. David Hyde Pierce - Frasier
9. Julia Louis Dreyfus - Seinfeld
10. Kelsey Grammer - Frasier

Anonymous:

Supporting actor, no. The Academy, more than any group I feel, helps you if your film does well. Murray and Leto would both be sole nominees, my predicted five all would be going in likely with other nominations for their film, likely. Maybe Rylance, which would indicate that they love Chicago Seven, but that is only remotely possible if he gets the BAFTA nod.

Lead actor, I don't know what to do with. Lindo could pull a Banderas (though Banderas at least had the Globe nod at this point), but there is no reason to be too doubtful out of anyone in that SAG five.

Calvin Law said...

Okay this is gonna be SUCH a hot take, but I found Jason Alexander and Julia Louis Dreyfus to be leagues ahead of Michael Richards when watching Seinfeld. I don’t know, like Kramer is funny, I guess I just never found him THAT funny, whereas Alexander and Dreyfus had me cracking up just about every second they’re onscreen outside of Alexander’s rough start.

Anonymous said...

I have a felling that rylance will get bafta nomination since the baftas love nominating british people but i think that he will not get it in the end.

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: In regards to Seinfeld, I too preferred Alexander and Dreyfus to Richards just in the consistency of their later work. That being said, Richards still had his fair share of moments, such as his "I'm out" scene which never fails to get a laugh out of me.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: the thing is I could just as easily see that one being Redmayne.

RatedRStar said...

Louis: Its interesting that your predictions were like a whole month before the actual nominations and yet, it is probably your best ever predictions since the supporting 5 looks like the 5 I think, Actor is either gonna be 4/5 or 5/5 so.

Stephen Patterson said...

Your thoughts on Sam Worthington in Avatar.

RatedRStar said...

Paul Raci I think is in a somewhat fortunate scenario in that despite him not having GG or SAG, I feel quite confident in predicting him getting in over Leto and Murray.

Luke Higham said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Luke Higham said...

RatedRStar: I hope he gets the Bafta nod because unlike Lead Actor, I'm feeling anxious about Supporting.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: this isn’t a joke question, but do you think Leto’s character was guilty or not in The Little Things? Promise this will be the first and last question I ask about it.

Calvin Law said...

BAFTA having six slots is great for having more nominees but also makes it much hard as a predictor, it will be more about who gets left out than who gets in.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

I mean yes, by virtue of a lack of other candidates. The film trying to make it this a ? is such a failing of the film. Compare it to the films that do it well, Zodiac, Memories of Murder even Burning. In the first two, there are several different potential suspects with evidence to support and not support the claim of guilt to each suspect. In the third, you never know if the crime really happened or not. We are never given doubt about Leto, other than he doesn't fully confess. Although the film, is even dumber, because theoretically the ambiguity would be quickly erased if they were wrong if another murder with that MO were to happen.

Robert MacFarlane said...

WTF, The Invisible Man didn’t make the Best VFX shortlist

Louis Morgan said...

Sorry to see Color Out of Space miss both makeup and VFX (though expected). Glad Minari's score and song made it this far at least.

Robert:

Strange omission, particularly.

Calvin Law said...

Sad to see Preparations to Be Together for A Long Period of Time not make the International Film shortlist but delighted to see Collective and Night of Kings make it in.

Agreed with Robert, weird omission. Along with Colour Out of Space and Possessor. Fuck sake.

*sees Minari for both Original Score and Original Song* Good my job here is done.

Calvin Law said...

Also fuck, just realised Hillbilly Elegy is probably making it into Makeup and Hairstyling.

Aidan Pittman said...

Disappointed to see The Personal History of David Copperfield omitted from the Original Score shortlist and Borat Subsequent Moviefilm from the Makeup one. Relieved to see Boys State made the Documentary shortlist, though.

Calvin Law said...

Oh wait Borat didn’t make Makeup? Damn that’s wild. It’s my personal win at the moment lol

Maybe they didn’t know that Trump ‘mask’ was actually makeup?

Calvin Law said...

Also the intent is completely satirical and its use in the film is great but I will be kind of worried if ‘Wuhan Flu’ get a nomination. I feel like the nature of the song will cause a lot of uncomfortable discourse and not in the right way. That’s just me though.

Mitchell Murray said...

Calvin: I doubt that it will, honestly. The only previous nomination that's sort of similar would be "Blame Canada", but even that wasn't done in reference to any hot button issues or events at the time - at least, none that I'm aware of.

Anonymous said...

Louis: Thoughts on these choices for a 50's The Grand Budapest Hotel?

Gustave H.: Ronald Colman
Young Zero: Omar Sharif
Old Zero: Boris Karloff
Dmitri: David Farrar
J.G. Jopling: John Carradine
Agatha: Claire Bloom
Madame D.: Gladys Cooper
Kovacs: Anton Walbrook
Henckels: Alec Guinness
Serge X: David Niven
Ludwig: Edward G. Robinson
Author: Raymond Massey
Young Author: Richard Attenborough
M. Ivan: Claude Rains

Bryan L. said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the makeup & visual effects for Color Out of Space.

Louis Morgan said...

Calvin:

I mean to be fair, the makeup was the least of the film's vices, though also nothing special...although then again I think Davis's makeup in Ma Rainey (the front runner)'s is actively bad (and not in the way intended).

Anonymous:

Sorry, love Colman but James Mason is the only acceptable retro-casting for Monsieur Gustave, I'd say from the 40's to the 60's.

Calvin Law said...

Almost all the makeup contenders are fairly underwhelming. Promising Young Woman would’ve been a nice inclusion considering how MUCH makeup and hairstyling work goes into Cassie’s character. Really don’t understand its omission.

Aidan Pittman said...

Calvin: Really surprised PYW didn't make it into Makeup, especially after BAFTA longlists. I was even predicting for it to get nominated before today.

Louis Morgan said...

Bryan:

Actually both snubs are starting to stick in my craw a bit, particularly in comparison to some of the inclusions, "The Little Things" in makeup for what? Leto's slightly gaunt face? The crime scenes we barely see? And The Midnight Sky for VFX, for what? Most misused budget, I mean the scenes on the other planet were just awful green screen, and the blood effects in one scene where straight out of Mission To Mars, you know that 20 year old film.

Any way, Color Out of Space uses such an artful combination of makeup and visual effects to create its horror and atmosphere. This as we get some great stylish bits in the little creatures and just the use of colors throughout the film. We get a nice balance of the subtle and the extreme with both, and both are quite remarkably realized given its lower budget. We great subtle makeup like Cage's arms changing, or the more intense ones like the transformed barn animals, the amalgam mother/son in its early form or Chong's final fate (that should've alone guaranteed it a nomination at least). The same for the VFX, with the subtle "infections", unnatural light, the changing landscape to the bigger such as the final form of the amalgam, which I think is a combination of both practical and CGI, and of course the finale both in the typhoon of light and the extra-dimensional creature behind it all. Impressive work almost across the board, and should've been recognized for both.

Calvin:

Yeah definitely another strange snub there.

Aidan Pittman said...

Louis: Your thoughts on the makeup and hairstyling in Borat Subsequent Moviefilm?

Calvin Law said...

Watched The Father, I think I might need another rewatch to fully get bearings on it but at the very least I'm quite positive on it, and the performances lived up to expectations. No matter what way this year's Best Actor race goes it'll already be much better than last year's (not that last year's was bad but this year has so many fantastic performances).

Louis: would you say that 2020 in the end has had more good/great films than you'd expected given the circumstances? And also, your thoughts on these 1990s and 2000s versions of The Father.

Anthony: Alec Guinness
Anne: Helen Mirren
Paul: Ciaran Hinds
Laura: Rachel Weisz
Bill: David Warner
Catherine: Joanna Lumley

Anthony: Richard Attenborough
Anne: Emma Thompson
Paul: Peter Capaldi
Laura: Natalie Dormer
Bill: Timothy Dalton
Catherine: Juliet Stevenson

Anonymous said...

I hope paul raci is not just wishful thinking like when louis predicted liam neeson for silence.

Anonymous said...

Also anyone feel that dev patel has a chance at a bafta nod? The baftas love dev patel as they gave him the win for lion and nominated him for slumdog millionaire (in supporting actor which is blatant category fraud).

Louis Morgan said...

Aidan:

Well the makeup largely is more for complete silliness, though it has to be convincing to some respect, in that in some circumstances it is a literal disguise. How good of one changes on the scene, his Trump makeup, which is more striking than convincing for example. His disguises, which are usually a lot of hair and a big nose, obviously worked in their literal purpose, but also are enjoyable in their ridiculousness. Also important to note is the more subtle work on Bakalova's transformations, which are all quite well done.

Calvin:

Yes I would, in the end the biggest thing missing were blockbusters, which to be fair some still got released they just happened all to be underwhelming in some way.

Guinness and Attenborough are both perfect choices.

Anonymous:

Well to be fair, Neeson didn't have the amount of critics prizes that Raci has, but there is typically a snub per year to remind us they don't mean THAT much.

Anonymous:

Impossible, because it already had its run last year (was nominated for best casting). BAFTA, unlike the Oscars, accepts limited screenings/festivals without a formal public release for a film to be included into competition.

Calvin Law said...

It’s a shame they didn’t hold it out for this year’s release because with the scarcity of British releases, it could’ve made a splash at BAFTA. Just a lone nomination for casting is a damn shame; in this year I think it could’ve been a BAFTA nom for screenplay, Actor, Supporting Actor and Actress, and a slew of technicals.

Anonymous said...

Wow considering the baftas saw david copperfield they could (and should) have nominated tilda swinton over margot robbie for either one of her nominations (but espically once upon a time in hollywood).

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Thoughts on A Brighter Summer Day and the cast.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Given that you pointed out its surprising lack of relevance, why do you think Avatar was unable to reach the same "iconic" status in the eyes of the public like Titanic did?

Anonymous said...

Tahmeed: Somebody on youtube pointed out that avatar is a movie ehre you come for the amazing visuals and dont remember anything other than the visuals.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: Have you finished any of the Series recommendations.

Anonymous said...

Calvin do you think Hopkins will be Louis's overall winner?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: I don't think it's a foregone conclusion. It's a Mikkelsen/Hopkins showdown. If not for Hearts In Atlantis, Hopkins would have my support but I'm putting all my support behind Mads.

Calvin Law said...

Anonymous: it's either him or Hopkins and both would be extraordinary winners. Really can't go wrong this year, and I'm hoping for a possible all-5's lineup.

Calvin Law said...

On that note though, while it's true that Hopkins is campaigning, I don't really get the vibe that he's driven to get a win. It just comes across as he's very happy that his film is getting recognition and appreciating the love.

Bryan L. said...

Hopkins & Mikkelsen.

I wonder if they have anything in common...

Luke Higham said...

Bryan: They'll be having a nice Chianti with a plate of Human Liver and Fava Beans. :)

Luke Higham said...

Honestly guys, you need to check out Hannibal. Mikkelsen is utterly brilliant throughout.

Calvin Law said...

Yeah Hannibal Is excellent and they also might be doing a new season at some point.

Anonymous said...

What are performances nominated for an oscar that you cannot believe was nominated. For me it would be Robert Downey jr in tropic thunder. Amazing performance that deserved to be nominated but also a type of performance the academy usually ignores.

Mitchell Murray said...

Anonymous: Sigourney Weaver in "Aliens"; Still such an outlier of a nomination - especially when one looks at the best actress category overall - but a great performance nonetheless.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Anonymous: May have mentioned this quite a few times, but Depp for Pirates, and Morita for the first Karate Kid.

Bryan L. said...

Luke: Haha :)

Both Mikkelsen & Hopkins are two of the nicest/most genuine people in Hollywood as well. Up there at least.

Mitchell Murray said...

Really, any nominated performances in quote on quote "genre" films could qualify - or at least any that weren't part of a drama, biopic or musical.

Tim said...

generally comedic performances, like Kevin Kline in A Fish Called Wanda or Jonah Hill in Wolf of Wall Street

Mitchell Murray said...

Bryan: Certainly. Of all the celebrities I would love to meet and talk with, Hopkins and Mikkelsen are definitely two of them.

Emi Grant said...

Anonymous: I'm still in disbelief at Banderas being nominated last year. Literally no nomination brought me nearly that much satisfaction that time.

It just felt really cool that this one performance on the one film I happened to catch like all the way back in July and loved happened to get so much traction to get nominated. Also, I'm glad Banderas became an Academy Award nominee.

Louis Morgan said...

Luke:

Alright regarding A Brighter Summer Day, let's talk about objective and subjectivity in film criticism again shall we. This as objectively I have to praise the film, gorgeous cinematography, well realized character, a real sense of place, and theoretically fascinating scenario. Now having said that I have to put in my own subjective feelings that the film simply never hooked me in the way needed for a film of this length. I can speak to some minor reasons why, but there is definitely nothing wrong about the film. I appreciated Yang's passive style, the length does grant time to little details and there aren't scenes where I was going "you could've taken that out". The length is part of the film's purpose and approach. An approach I don't even have a problem with, I can love a long film, even a deliberate long film, but I didn't love this film. Why? I don't know fully, the most I can come with is Chang Chen's lead performance, and again not because he's bad but he's good not great, maybe a great central turn would've been that ingredient to fully bring me into the film. As it stands, I can't really speak a word against the film, but I was not pulled within it as I hoped I would be given its nature and reception.

Chang Chen - 4(As I said a good performance. He does have enough charisma in realizing sort of the casual confidence of the character that slowly degrades towards something less appealing. It is a good portrayal of a sort of a Romeoesque style foolishness. We see the descent not as this immediate thing but rather part of the impulsive qualities of youth.)

Chang Kuo-chu - 4(Perhaps I'm showing my age a bit, but I did kind of want more of the father's story, as I was quite fascinated by the glimpses we get of it. Chang's performance bringing this quiet internalized sense of a real anxiety, while still presenting forth the seemingly calm and able father. It is a quietly moving portrayal as he presents a guy who has a lot going on within him, yet presents it all as though he is just still this pillar of his family.)

Jin - 3.5(Gives a moving though also varied portrayal of the carrying but never one note mother. Again well realized, though again I perhaps wanted strangely a bit more of her and her dynamic, as the bits we get are quite good.)

Wong - 3.5(Good as sort of the best friend/lieutenant style character. He brings a nice endearing energy in his his interactions presenting an effective kind of combination of sort of the seriousness of their working together within the gang of sorts, and just a childish quality of just a group of kids hanging out.)

Yang - 3.5(Although I like her scenes where we do see her out of the relationship perspective, which she is effective with, largely we see her through that. She is good though in creating a complexity as being seemingly pure but also not pure, the dream but also the reality.)

Although I will attempt to get to the series recommendations if I have time, I'm giving the priority to films.

Tahmeed:

Well I'm probably the wrong guy to ask that given my hatred for the film, but I truly think it was just empty beyond the visuals, which even those are more in a purely technically sense. I mean are the Na'vi iconic, not really, nor where the villains, which were as arch as they get. I really think it was all flash, and once that wore away, there wasn't much there, so people just forgot about it. Titanic's appeal was one of emotional investment, the investment with Avatar was almost purely visceral, like an amusement part ride.

Calvin:

I would agree regarding Hopkins in terms of campaigning, though I do think he could still pull a few upsets even if Boseman still wins in the end. It helps Boseman actually that almost everyone agrees that Hopkins's Oscar win was inspired and deserved.

Anonymous said...

Louis: I can't believe I didn't think of Mason for Gustave, he would have been great. Thoughts on the other choices?

Tim said...

recently saw Lars and the Real Girl, and i'm getting really exited for the future review. The film itself i liked fine, although it did have some flaws. Like the scene near the beginning where Gosling go tackled by Emily Mortimer to come to dinner; i guess that was supposed to be comedic (?) but just felt really out if place. The brother's arc from comic relief to a genuine mentor also was not really handled really well for me, but i liked that it kept it's premise as a lot more than just a cheer one-time-joke, and of course had a great performance in the middle of it.


Gosling - 5
Mortimer - 3.5
Schneider - 2
Clarkson - 3
Garner - 2.5

Mitchell Murray said...

Tim: That's a movie I really ought to watch all the way through, since I've only seen the "meeting Bianca" and "touch therapy" scenes.

Also, and I'm sure this was the intent, but Gosling should probably stick to heavy stubble instead of that moustache.

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

Well Sharif was my own choice for Young Zero, so of I concur there. I can support all your other choices, particularly Carradine as Jopling, Robinson and Ludwig, and Guinness as Henckles (though I'd personally cast Guinness in more roles overall). The only one I can't quite see is Niven as Serge X, need some one more sniveling, perhaps Peter Sellers or Peter Lorre.

Calvin Law said...

Louis: exactly, if Hopkins had never won before or won for something like I don’t know, Nixon or Amistad, then we might be seeing more of a narrative for him, but an Oscar win for Hannibal Lecter is such a great achievement (even if admittedly it doesn’t come close to representing the vast range of talent Hopkins has). Honestly I’m just pleased to see him enjoying this campaign. I know he didn’t really care much about The Two Popes’ campaign last year but the fact this film meant a lot to him and he’s so keen to take part in virtual promoting is just lovely.

Emi Grant said...

Louis: Thoughts on this?

https://www.indiewire.com/2021/02/stanley-kubrick-unmade-lunatic-at-large-filming-fall-2021-1234616124/?fbclid=IwAR3bqOQBvsQc0UreXXjHwYyVy-DRWRekluiFfFXmipo1ZUtJm0omJojW9dA

Emi Grant said...

To my understanding, the thing is only a partial manuscript by Jim Thompson that was later re-worked, but it still feels kind of like a big deal.

Louis Morgan said...

Emi Grant:

Well have some mixed feelings. Love Thompson's work with Kubrick, however I have been far less impressed by the other films made from his work, though maybe the collaboration was the key ingredient.

The idea of making a Kubrickesque film is difficult, and with no director named (unless I missed something in the article), it is hard to get too excited at this venture. Just it is important for a film to have its own life, even if it potentially sort of lives up/pay homage to Kubrick's style, the tail can't wag the dog. There's a reason that doesn't often work, Blade Runner 2049 is a great example of it completely working however that is an outlier. So I guess if they announce Denis Villeneuve as the director, my tune would change instantly.

Tim said...

Mitchell: that Stache was glorious

Robert MacFarlane said...

It looks like Mahershala Ali has been cast as Joel in The Last of Us HBO series. Good choice. The fanboys are already frothing at the mouth, of course, but fuck 'em.

Tim said...

Robert: in itself a good choice, but come on, Josh Brolin, Gerard Butler or Hugh Jackman, the bearded three themselves, would be so obviously looking the part it's really not funny

Robert MacFarlane said...

Ffs.

Michael McCarthy said...

...Since when are Josh Brolin, Gerard Butler and Hugh Jackman known collectively as “The bearded three”?

Tim said...

i just made that up

Mitchell Murray said...

Robert: As someone who REALLY loves the first "The Last of us" and would consider myself a "fan boy"....I can respect the choice. Josh Brolin would've been my personal casting, and Jackman was basically a dead ringer for Joel in "Prisoners", but I see no harm in giving Ali the part.

When it comes to casting David, however, I'm not sure you could do any better than John Hawkes (Hello, Tear Drop?)

Mitchell Murray said...

Also, in Tim's defense - Brolin, Butler and Jackman would've all been great choices if there were going for sheer physical resemblance to Joel. Obviously, that's not what they're doing with Ali, but since it's their series they frankly can do whatever they want. So long as the show is ultimately good, they'll hear no whining from me.

Tim said...

i am not even complaining about the choice either, but let's be honest, it has to be mentioned, and it will be mentioned forevermore, let's not be kidding ourselves

Calvin Law said...

Ali is a fantastic choice. Bella Ramsey aka Lyanna Mormont is starring as Ellie which is another casting win.

Calvin Law said...

Also between this and Blade I am rejoicing at Ali's bank account. He deserves this.

Calvin Law said...

Ah, apparently it's Pedro Pascal. Also a great choice.

Robert MacFarlane said...

Man, it’s been a good week for him.

Anonymous said...

Louis - what are your acting predictions for BAFTA?

Louis Morgan said...

Anonymous:

You can see those on the previous post.

Tahmeed Chowdhury said...

Louis: Although it might be slightly blasphemous to suggest this, but do you think there'd be a potential for a biopic on Mozart's life outside of Amadeus? If so, who would be your cast and director.

Luke Higham said...

Louis: If you're seeing it today, thoughts on The Spectacular Now and the cast.

Anonymous said...

Gina carano is leaving the Mandalorian. I remember when they complained that gal gadot was cast as wonder woman and not her. Lol

Robert MacFarlane said...

Correction: She was fired for being a right-wing asshole. Good riddance.

Anonymous said...

In my opinion she was easily the weakest cast-member of Deadpool.

Robert MacFarlane said...

She's a lousy actress in general.

Anonymous said...

Luke, which decade do you look forward to revisit the most.

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Probably the 2000s but I look forward to each decade from the 1950s onwards. No offence to the 30s and 40s but I'm more interested in the Silent Era which is largely untapped and 39 is the one year from either of those two that I'm really looking forward to yet Louis will more than likely have it as the finale.

Anonymous said...

Luke, what performances do you hope louis upgrades?

Luke Higham said...

Anonymous: Anything that Louis has mentioned in the past being a possibility. Lately I've kinda enjoyed getting into statistics when it comes to the overall strength of each year.

Paddy Considine in Dead Man's Shoes is definitely my #1 for an upgrade.

moviefilm said...

Hello everyone! I want to ask the ones, who had already seen The Father: Is it available somewhere online, or at VOD? Or are you lucky enough to live in countries, where the theatres are open? Thanks a lot!

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 265   Newer› Newest»