Al Pacino did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Bobby in The Panic in Needle Park.
The Panic in Needle Park though effective in parts is a disjointed film that follows the relationship between two drug addicts, Helen (Kitty Winn) and Bobby.
This stands as Al Pacino's "The Men" in that it is his only leading turn which predates his major breakout with The Godfather. The earliest scenes of his performance in the film call upon something Pacino rarely ever called upon in the seventies or even later in his career that being a natural charm. As also shown in the Scarecrow a couple years later, also directed by Jerry Schatzberg, Pacino is more than capable in this regard and it is always interesting to see the actor, best known for the brooding Michael Corleone, to be able to relax a little bit. Pacino is indeed very charming here as he shows Bobby, in his best moments, to have this certain lust for existence itself as he goes about his random days in any way he wishes. Pacino brings the right exuberance to these moments, and most importantly realizes the appeal of Bobby as his relationship with Kitty initially begins. In the early scenes the drugs are more of in the background and Pacino has some very strong chemistry with Winn. They have the right ease with each other, and this is pivotal to the way they develop in the film. They are terrific in the way they create the initial basis of the co-dependence as they find the initial basis in a genuine affection, which Pacino makes particularly convincing by how engaging of a personality he is.
The central relationship though begins to find its rough patches right away though given that they are both drug addicts, and Bobby only encourages the use of harder drugs to Helen. Pacino quickly reveals that the charming side, though earnest in its own right, is not all there is to Bobby. Pacino is very good in developing Bobby's whole attachment to drugs which he does in an effectively casual fashion. That is when he uses heroine and encourages Helen to use it as well Pacino does not portray Bobby really giving anything a second thought. Pacino creates the sense of a true addict, who has been an addict for some time, in the way he does not suggest really even a moments hesitation at any point. Pacino instead portrays this as naturally as he does Bobby's charm. Pacino allows to be simply part of the life, and getting high is almost the same as breathing for him. There is a great moment early on for Pacino when Bobby asks Helen to score for him. Pacino is excellent in this scene as he bridges the charmer with the addict, and not even in a sinister way. Instead Pacino manages the connection in Bobby words as he makes it sound like a good step in their relationship, and what's remarkable is that Pacino makes sense of it, at least in terms of Bobby's view. Pacino finds an honesty in the request as he makes it of the genuine lover, rather than of a seedy user.
Now as the film progresses, and focuses far more closely on Helen than Bobby, though Pacino is still lead, it becomes far less concise and rather aimless. The point behind this is understandable, which I will get to in a moment, but it falters in that it fails to makes itself compelling enough within this aimlessness. Pacino's performance also becomes aimless though again understandably so. This is as Bobby begins to become all over the place, this is in part due to the greater focus on Helen, as we never witness a transition period, not even a brief one. In one scene Bobby will be raging against Helen for being a prostitute, the next he'll be loving her, the next he'll be high and lost, others he'll be overdosing and almost dying, the next still he'll be back to his charming self that wins Helen over once again. This not exactly as much of a problem as it might sound, and it certainly is not a problem with Pacino's performance. The reason being the film's goal as well as Pacino's is to capture the mess that the pair of co-dependent junkies becomes. The film's mess again is unfortunately not quite compelling enough, but Pacino should not be faulted. Pacino manages to capture any side of Bobby we might see at a given point and is convincing on that side. Whether that is bringing back the charm, or bringing a far uglier side in the intense anger that comes about in the worst moments of the relationship. The same goes in drifting from a seemingly functioning drug addict, to Pacino becoming a physical wreck whenever Bobby is suffering from too much or too little heroine. Pacino's work makes a cohesive whole out of the mess that Bobby is. I do have to admit though that the film's own weaknesses hinder Pacino a bit. However Pacino's performance on its own still stands as strong early indication of his talent as an actor.
213 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 213 of 213Henson was actually my favorite performance in Mockingjay Part 2. Then again, he was mute.
Louis: People have defended Peck's performance in Spellbound because he was supposed to play the part that way. What do you think of this?
Saw Miles Ahead. Fairly bog standard in terms of the script and it doesn't do the flashback/flashforward musical biopic as well as Love & Mercy, but it's intriguingly directed, and of course features a great central performance from...
Cheadle: 4.5 (verging on a 5, and he probably will be, just need to ruminate about how exactly Cheadle utilises himself as an actor in the film and how much is down to his direction)
McGregor: 4 (would say he's supporting)
Stuhlbarg: 3
Corinealdi: 3
Stanfield: 3
Saw two films, Love Letters and Portrait of Jennie, both starring Joseph Cotten and Jennifer Jones. Good films. For both of his performances, I give Cotten a 4,5. Cotten is such an underrated actor.
He's really good in Portrait of Jennie. Simple role but he nails the wonderment of the artist perfectly.
Calvin: So, have you seen those Karloff performances I recommended to you?
Feeling a little bored. How about some retro castings?
Hellboy (1930's, by James Whale)
Hellboy: Boris Karloff
Liz: Louise Brooks
Abe: John Carradine
Krauss: Claude Rains
Prince Nuada: Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.~
Tom Manning: Edward G. Robinson
Professor Broom: Harry Davenport
Drive (1940's, by Robert Siodmak)
The Driver: Burt Lancaster
Irene: Ava Gardner
Shannon: Humphrey Bogart
Bernie Rose: Edward G. Robinson
Nino: Paul Muni
Blanche: Veronica Lake
300 (1950's version, by William Wyler)
Leonidas: Charlton Heston
Gorgo: Anne Baxter
Xerxes: Yul Brynner
Anonymous: Afraid not, could you list them again?
For retro castings, I love that Hellboy cast.
The Sixth Sense (1960's directed by Jack Clayton)
Dr Crowe: Dirk Bogarde
Cole: Martin Stephens
Lynn: Maureen O'Hara
Calvin: The Black Room (1935) and The Body Snatcher (1945). I have to say that for me, it's a tie between Karloff and Milland for Best Actor of 1945.
Another retrocasting.
Drive (1930's version, by William A. Wellman)
The Driver: Gary Cooper (Perfect cast to me, and it shouldn't be hard for Wellman to get a good performance out of Coop)
Irene: Helen Hayes
Shannon: Walter Huston
Bernie Rose: Louis Wolheim
Nino: Edward G. Robinson
Blanche: Jean Harlow
Just finished watching Swamp Water. Pretty good atmospheric film. Worth watching. Huston and Brennan were great.
I'll just switch Hayes with Stanwyck for Irene, since she had more chemistry with Cooper.
So I watched Cold Mountain all the way through last night, and I have only this to ask: Why did none of you warn me about the Melora Walters horror movie sex scene inexplicably thrown in there?!
Anonymous:
I find that a far to frequent excuse for a bad performance. I don't that's justified at all in that case given that Peck's approach was not really wrong so to speak, the problem was that he was bland in the "sane" scenes and horribly hammy in the "insane" scenes.
Post a Comment