tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post8150269530223983372..comments2024-03-28T08:13:56.915-04:00Comments on Best Actor: Alternate Best Actor 1994: ResultsLouis Morganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-17029741816995244662020-11-22T22:06:28.104-05:002020-11-22T22:06:28.104-05:00And also your thoughts on Eat Drink Man Woman. And also your thoughts on Eat Drink Man Woman. Calvin Lawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11392068349392739631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-18995858249566452492020-11-22T22:03:27.834-05:002020-11-22T22:03:27.834-05:00Irene Jacob would've been such an inspired cho...Irene Jacob would've been such an inspired choice in Best Actress, it's a real shame they didn't go for her considering they quite loved the film. In fact, if they'd just gone a bit more international that year in the acting categories it would've been way cooler. Like, they clearly did in some of the technical categories, why not extend to the acting ones considering how boring some of their choices were. Also glad you enjoyed Muriel's Wedding. <br /><br />Louis: your thoughts on the scene of Gareth producing the 'Not to be shown to the defence' evidence in 'In the Name of the Father'? While I agree that Thompson's role is pretty limited throughout I think she's genuinely amazing throughout that sequence (as are DDL of course, all the other bit players, and of course Sheridan's direction). Calvin Lawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11392068349392739631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-61124919046456829452020-11-22T21:54:04.286-05:002020-11-22T21:54:04.286-05:00Omar:
I will try to check those out. I tried to w...Omar:<br /><br />I will try to check those out. I tried to watch Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle but the copy I procured wasn't any good, though I'll see if I can find another way. <br /><br />Anonymous:<br /><br />It's a wonderful little film, that was unexpected in many ways and quite surprising in some. This as the whole thing I expected more traditional coming out of one's shell rom com but there was a whole lot more to it, this particularly in the detail it granted to so many of the supporting characters. It cuts deeper in a lot of places than I expected, while also fulfilling what more I expected in being genuinely enjoyable and entertaining. Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-7223526867999187132020-11-22T20:09:52.797-05:002020-11-22T20:09:52.797-05:00Bryan:
1. Flirting With Disaster
2. Three Kings
3...Bryan:<br /><br />1. Flirting With Disaster<br />2. Three Kings<br />3. The Fighter<br />4. Silver Linings Playbook<br />5. I Heart Huckabees<br />6. Spanking the Monkey<br />7. Joy <br />8. American HustleLouis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-2813356942901149002020-11-22T20:07:33.520-05:002020-11-22T20:07:33.520-05:00Anonymous:
Foster – 2(Well speaking of pure artif...Anonymous:<br /><br />Foster – 2(Well speaking of pure artifice….yeah I don’t believe this performance for a second. I find the whole thing feels like an idea of such a person fashioned for the most cloying and manipulative moments possible. Foster plays hard into every one of them in such an overtly calculated turn.)<br /><br />Anonymous:<br /><br />Neeson - (Well this is a boring part, and Neeson plays it in an extremely boring way. He’s just lifeless here. I mean it isn’t a great part to begin with, but there is even a blueprint in Lew Ayres in Johnny Belinda a blueprint on how to do it. Well Neeson doesn’t do that.)<br /><br />Luke & Lucas:<br /><br />For Curtis apparently she was just deleted when I was copying over the old lineup for starters. She should be #11. For supporting I’ll admit I rushed a bit as it was the last thing I did before posting. Plummer should be #8 and Foster #14. <br /><br />For Ed Wood I know what happened, as I couldn’t remember if it was adapted or original, and accidentally left it out of both lineups. It should be #2 in adapted. <br /><br />Bryan:<br /><br />Clerks I honestly think is only a minor step up from typical low budget schlock, this solely in Smith’s dialogue that is occasionally sort of cleverish, I guess, not always, and so often stilted as delivered. It really doesn’t have much insight, and really doesn’t develop itself into anything. It changes tones randomly, and a lot the scenes just kind of sits there. It really is a right time sort of film, by being one of the first to have characters talk like a “nerd” quite simply. This as the film itself isn’t anything great on its own, particularly the acting, which doesn’t have any hidden stars in the mix. <br /><br />Shallow Grave is definitely one of Boyle’s best films where his style is not overdone and when it is more overt it actually is befitting to the circumstances. It is an effective off-beat sort of noir, of the type I like of the series of bad decisions in handling a “simple plan”. I do wish Peter Mullan wasn’t just a glorified extra in it, but nonetheless the three leads turn it into a memorable descent into a kind of madness.Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-59731787557960781232020-11-22T20:07:11.474-05:002020-11-22T20:07:11.474-05:00Lange – 2(I kind of hated this performance. This a...Lange – 2(I kind of hated this performance. This as I felt Lange overacted every step of the way in creating this caricature of the lusty wife. This just hitting every note in such over the top broad strokes. This even in her later scenes of the changing really aren’t changing at all, but just continued to be these ridiculous notes of flamboyance. I’ll say the film itself isn’t Richardson’s finest hour being oddly a thriller and character drama crammed together. Lange’s work here just pure artifice and not in a way that relates to any truth.)<br /><br />Hoop Dreams – (I’ll say slightly I suppose I didn’t quite love it as much as its reputation suggests. This as often stated the greatest documentary of all time, and as an avid Siskel and Ebert watcher, I was well aware of the film going in. I mean I think the dull narration honestly could only be gotten away with in a film that otherwise is as good as this one. This as the rest of the film is great in managing to artfully, again mainly through editing and juxtaposition, in not only covering so intimately the personal stories of the teenagers, but also just how many other topics it is able to cover within that. Whether that is overarching elements like race and exploitation within the basketball system, or the particularly personal in the relation with the parents.)<br /><br />Heavenly Creatures – (I loved this film by Jackson who I felt was able to strike quite the balance in not making an exploitation of the murder but trying to grant a view of the horrible circumstances that led to it. This as he creates powerfully the sense of hysteria in his directing that grants you the perspective of both the girls, that shows both the spirited but also the destructive qualities of their fantasies. In turn though I think he balances this in keeping a sense of showing the failure of the parents with the right context of their own humanity. He importantly doesn’t villainize them, rather showing every one is kind a victim of a circumstance in a way.)<br /><br />Red – (Just lovely in every way one can say in just the experience is so transfixing and yet so unique in its own way. This in finding kind of a complex way to tell a simple story, and granting such beauty to such simple moments. This in creating this fascinating kind of mystery towards the approach of the storytelling even as it maintains itself in a purely personal perspective. A perspective that so wonderfully realizes itself in such an articulate balance between purely visual moments, but also essential scenes of dialogue. I adored everything about the climax between the two central characters that was built on the stunning visual of the staging, from the storm to just the “red of it all, but yet never did this overcome the intimate beauty of learning the truth of “mystery” through a moment of such tenderness.)Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-81249353753158228552020-11-22T20:06:44.247-05:002020-11-22T20:06:44.247-05:00Harris – (Just a nice charming youth performance t...Harris – (Just a nice charming youth performance to be sure in perhaps Spike Lee’s least abrasive film, which I quite liked actually. Harris provides a nice just sincere performance to the proceedings. Definitely a child performance in some ways but it works.)<br /><br />MacLaine – (Unlike Cage, MacLaine is able to get the balance down quite effectively. This finding a balance in creating the grumpy qualities of the character in a humorous way, while also still finding a certain sense of the underlying sadness within the character. The film isn’t particularly good still but MacLaine artfully elevates it.)<br /><br />Griffiths – (Griffiths performance provides one the greatest “best friend” rom com (though Muriel’s wedding actually isn’t that), performances. Griffiths finding the really endearing energy in being the flamboyant one to Collette’s performance that creates a believable sense of how she would bring her out of her shell a bit. Griffith’s is absolutely winning in creating the eagerness of the character with the right humorous touch in being abrasive in just the right way. She’s wonderful and naturally segues towards a more moving portrayal as the character is forced to temper herself somewhat tragically. Griffiths is excellent in moving to becoming this sort of quietly cutting moral center later on. Finding often in just reactions offering the right sense of indignation towards her friend’s failure to do the right thing. In turn making the ending all the sweeter.)<br /><br />Moore & Smith – (Both are terrific in creating seemingly the opposite women, the one who meekly wants to be loved who is rejected against the one everyone wants, but rejects almost all. Moore brings the right charisma in the role to create this appeal, but balances it away from shallowness. This finding the right earnest emotion in her own rather internalized moments of desperation. Smith on the other hand shows the overt state of a quiet subdued desperation in the right sense of emotional turmoil kept in. This though she artfully balances in her portrayal of moments of personal strength in her own. Their best scene really being their one together where they play off each other so well in creating a real sense of the understanding between the two even as they are at odds.) <br /><br />Woodard – (A proper no nonsense mom even if her performance doesn’t quite have a final scene in a way. Her performance though brings well this state of the willfulness where she creates the sense of frustration but also the power of her personality within the film. Just wonderful work in making the right impact.)<br /><br />Peirse – (Good in portraying the woeful inadequacy in reaction to her daughter at every turn. What I really like about her work is that she manages to find the right humanity in the concern showing it to be genuine even as she seems to make the wrong decisions. She importantly shows just a mother unable to figure out what to do importantly maintaining the tragedy and horror of the final scene.)<br /><br />Cartlidge – (I didn’t really care for the film, where it felt like “here’s a random personal issue” now someone gets shot. Anyway Cartlidge though is quite good in presenting just the visceral emotional desperation of her situation and most important capturing the horror of her final scenes quite potently.)<br /><br />Watson – (Can’t help but feel this part was originally written as a step-mother than O. Russell decided to shock for shocks sake. This is as Watson plays it really more so than an actual mother at every turn, and in the former is where she is generally effective.)<br /><br />Delpy – (Finds the right sort of comic tone in her strangely adrift but also incisive wife that can’t quite be pleased.)<br /><br />Drynan – (Although fine in her early moments of just being put upon. She’s quite heartbreaking in just her simple reactions in her final scenes showing the disintegrating state of the character.)<br /><br />Harris – (Her typical sort of period piece thing, but a fine example of it.)Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-51104762567239472082020-11-22T20:06:11.527-05:002020-11-22T20:06:11.527-05:00Kirshner – (Honestly the most impressive thing is ...Kirshner – (Honestly the most impressive thing is that I didn’t even notice she was the same character in really her three iterations. This as she’s that good in realizing each. This in the first in the seemingly seductive temptress of the club doing the schoolgirl routine. She’s equally convincing though as just the normal desperate woman behind it all. She’s though wholly different seemingly the more normal woman in the mid-flashbacks where she brings just a nice normalcy. She’s great though in her last iteration in the deepest flashback in wholly conveying the youth and broken innocence of the character.)<br /><br />Ryder – (After watching this version I do have much to say at much of the flack the 2019 version received seemingly at behest of this version, which is also good, but...whatever I won’t get into it at the moment. Ryder anyways makes for a good Jo to be sure. Ryder carries herself I would say just with the particularly convincing qualities that make Jo as she grows up. This in the youthful willfulness of her creative spark that she brings such an endearing quality to. She naturally transforms though in the maturation as the woman trying to make her own name for herself. Finding the right naturalism in her Jo in creating the balance of the character really balancing herself in terms of individual strength but also personal need all the same. It’s wonderful work, and it’s a shame she was the surprise nod, as that she easily would’ve been the best choice of the nominees.)<br /><br />Kuei Mei Yang & Chien-Lien Wu – (Both are good in their own ways in creating the experience of the two women trying to find love and dealing with the men in their lives. One creating a more introspective portrayal that is moving in the nuance of the journey, against the other who is more overt in the expression of the journey. Both actresses create a balance between themselves in creating the different wavelengths of the characters particularly as they relate to their onscreen father.)<br /><br />Fox – (Good in portraying the seeming middle of the road while portraying the in the end most duplicitous of the three central characters. Fox is wonderful in playing though the different shades of a seeming innocence that slowly segues towards an overt greed. More than anything though she provides a nice balance between the dark internalization of Eccleston and the more overt qualities of McGregor’s performance. This in being sneaky as well in her own performance. )<br /><br />Sarandon – (Easily the best part of her film, even if the character is a bit overwritten in a certain sense. Sarandon though really makes the most out of her pretty weakly written scenes. This in bringing the right upfront confidence but also with a sense of a sort of playful humanity. This being particularly important to balancing out Renfro’s decidedly unlikable performance.)<br /><br />Richardson – (The film is horribly repetitive, but Richardson does her best to attempt to make it work. This just in granting some honesty to the repetitive scenes of her mental illness of different kinds. This which she realizes with a genuine quality even as the film doesn’t really have anything for her to do beyond this unfortunately, despite its length.)Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-86335443687427400132020-11-22T20:05:52.249-05:002020-11-22T20:05:52.249-05:00Jacob – (Quick side bar, I always hate the Hollywo...Jacob – (Quick side bar, I always hate the Hollywood reaction to a promising foreign star, “hey she was great in Red, let’s make her Wesley Snipes undeveloped girlfriend in US Marshalls!”. Anyway I loved Jacob’s work here that really is in many ways an atypical leading turn just in how reactionary and in a way supportive her work is. I loved this performance though in realizing in so much small moments and even silence such an overpowering sense of life. Her performance works so wonderfully by just how much clarity she reveals in the seemingly most minor of emotions in a certain sense. Her character isn’t going through the utmost tumultuous thing, yet the detail she grants within this is what makes it so special. This sense of life to her work, and particularly in crafting such uniquely great chemistry she has with Trintignant. This as in every one of her interactions with him there is such a sense of really human bonding, of love, not in the romantic sense, but in the purely human understanding of one another.)<br /><br />Collette – (I think it is fair to say Collette’s got one of the greatest comedic to dramatic range out of any actress currently working. This shown quite clearly here where she is wonderfully charming and funny in portraying the most awkward of the awkward. This though in the first half of the film showing just every state of not quite knowing how to place herself at any point. Of course within this Collette does fine the right quiet undercurrent of the sadness behind it all. Collette’s terrific in making this unsaid quality within her work in presenting Muriel as basically always attempting to get along even as she’s technically just very sad inside at all times. She though gradually shows the change when she finally finds a true friend, striking absolute fantastic chemistry with Griffiths. This as you are granted both just their lovely warmth and the way you gauge some confidence within Collette’s performance. This confidence that ends up being really the crux of the second half of her performance. This as she initially presents as slowly growing toxic confidence that builds an ego, that slowly transitions to a genuine one in the wholly winning ending earned by Collette and Griffiths.)Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-41426878265738624782020-11-22T20:05:35.622-05:002020-11-22T20:05:35.622-05:00Luke:
Fiorentino – (I’ll say in general the acade...Luke:<br /><br />Fiorentino – (I’ll say in general the academy needed to move out of their comfort zone a bit for 94, as their lead choices were pretty underwhelming, and at the very least uninspired given the strength of the year overall. At least with Fiorentino there was some actual red tape that interfered with it. Now Fiorentino’s performance here is just outstanding in really making the femme fatale that might make all other femme fatale’s look at themselves in reflection. Her performance being defined by a core of ice cold greed being the central truth that Fiorentino performs the part. Everything else she does is “fake” and in that Fiorentino is brilliant in portraying these different sides of the phony characters. This whether it is as the overt seductress where she is more than a little convincing to say the least in her manipulations. Her greater manipulations come in the moments of seeming either a normal woman trying to move on, or that of the vulnerable woman. There Fiorentino is outstanding in playing a role in the role in showing the way she puts forth whatever she needs to in order to get what she needs. It is exceptional work that more than carries the film, it defines it.)<br /><br />Lynskey & Winslet – (The whole film I was rather surprised by in general, although there are some connections both to explotation Jackson and LOTR Jackson in its production design and effects use, what we get is basically a portrait of repression and hysteria. Lynskey and Winslet being essential in this portrayal of a specific insanity that reveals itself through the narrative. Now in Winslet you have a seemingly supremely confident performance that is perfectly befitting her character who seems to confident within herself. Winslet’s great though in her portrayal though of even in this confidence there is always a striking undercurrent of youthful petulance. This in that to a degree she makes it a certain bluster of a young woman who is in many ways just shaken by the uncertainty of her existence. Lynskey is great on the other end of it in being this ball of vulnerabilities and awkwardness. This that she makes so natural as this state of equal uncertainty though more overtly shown. We then see together their chemistry that is so essential. This in the admiration Lynskey brings and the sort of power that Winslet portrays in this admiration. In this the way the two interact is a whole lot all at once, which is really essential in creating the tragic end result. This in part their interactions are just as kid and their sort of specific energy they bring is wonderful in creating that sense within the friendship. At the same time though the two realize the sort of uncertain mutual attraction within the connection. This in both present it as really a lack of understanding but almost a random sense of lust within a love for one another. This though leading to the end where both mutually support each other in their mutual desperation, however unlike most friendships it doesn’t help each other it rather amplifies the reaction to the desperation towards violent end. The two are incredible in creating the mass hysteria in their performances though just realized in their scenes together. This in creating a most unique onscreen spark of emotion that is not properly understood by the individuals themselves yet all the more palatable when repressed. They’re both excellent in realizing the end act in such a chilling fashion by showing it so naturally coming from a place of initial innocence.)Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-2635840398885058162020-11-22T16:46:19.708-05:002020-11-22T16:46:19.708-05:00Louis - also what did you think of Muriels Wedding...Louis - also what did you think of Muriels Wedding as a film overall? So glad you liked Collette and GriffithsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-29801463622370334392020-11-22T16:13:27.024-05:002020-11-22T16:13:27.024-05:00Louis: Thoughts on William Daniels' work in Br...Louis: Thoughts on William Daniels' work in Brute Force?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-39083899615853022782020-11-22T13:25:27.555-05:002020-11-22T13:25:27.555-05:00Louis: overall i agree with you on Vive l’Amour, i...Louis: overall i agree with you on Vive l’Amour, i saw the movie back last year, it was my first Tsai and i didn’t know to expect. I didn’t enjoy the movie at first because it was interminable as you said and the pace was way too slow. I watched other movies from the Taiwanese director and started liking more his style/approach, or at least i thought it was more suitable for other stories such as What Time is It There and Rebels of the Neon God. I would still suggest you to check his other works.<br /><br />If you find a decent copy could you also watch the following movies?<br />La Separation (the movie is fine, i just wish it were longer to explore the titular separation better, both Huppert and Auteuil are terrific though, two strong 4s for me)<br />I Can’t Sleep and U.S. Go Home (two very underrated movies from Claire Denis in my opinion)<br />Confucian Confusion (an enjoyable movie from Edward Yang, not my favourite from him but i would say it is still worth the time) <br />Casa de Lava (probably the most accessible movie from Pedro Costa)<br /><br />Have you seen Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle? I loved Leigh’s performance in it but the movie isn’t that great overall.Omar Franinihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03165429222802818138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-55880497911787724562020-11-22T11:53:02.204-05:002020-11-22T11:53:02.204-05:00Also, would Ed Wood be in your top ten for screenp...Also, would Ed Wood be in your top ten for screenplays? I'm surprised it isn't in the top 7 since you like the movie so muchLucas Saavedrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04465055270902670341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-47127233520110336272020-11-22T11:49:10.360-05:002020-11-22T11:49:10.360-05:00Louis: you gave Jodie Foster in Maverick and Amand...Louis: you gave Jodie Foster in Maverick and Amanda Plummer in Pulp Fiction a 4. Are they still that rating? If so, where would they rank?Lucas Saavedrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04465055270902670341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-4827496731830407842020-11-22T11:05:22.878-05:002020-11-22T11:05:22.878-05:00Louis: Also, your updated David O. Russell ranking...Louis: Also, your updated David O. Russell ranking?Bryan L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11734763991830926605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-65232082444336156842020-11-22T10:54:23.972-05:002020-11-22T10:54:23.972-05:00I reached 2000 films myself a couple of months ago...I reached 2000 films myself a couple of months ago, and for the special occasion, I saw “Revanche”. (5/5)<br /><br />Louis: Your thoughts on Clerks & Shallow Grave, and ratings & thoughts on anyone else of note in both?<br />Bryan L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11734763991830926605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-10520375573211261632020-11-22T09:57:36.187-05:002020-11-22T09:57:36.187-05:00Nicol Williamson in The Bofors Gun is on that list...Nicol Williamson in The Bofors Gun is on that list since the film was still a proper bonus round viewing.Luke Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07075392435078135757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-3575384379089497412020-11-22T09:52:42.716-05:002020-11-22T09:52:42.716-05:00Luke, Thanks.Luke, Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-22191319184944181502020-11-22T09:50:40.189-05:002020-11-22T09:50:40.189-05:00Anonymous: I actually did make a list up on Google...Anonymous: I actually did make a list up on Google Docs on that exact topic but didn't include upgrades at all which would've given Lead Actor abit of an unfair advantage since the majority of them have happened there.<br /><br />Supporting Actress - 19<br />Supporting Actor - 27<br />Leading Actress - 68<br />Leading Actor - 62 (They were Equal until that huge upgrade for 94 Lead Actress)Luke Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07075392435078135757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-74283745244278877182020-11-22T09:42:28.980-05:002020-11-22T09:42:28.980-05:00Luke, since you've said on a prior occasion th...Luke, since you've said on a prior occasion that you tally the amount of 5s for each actor, can you tell me how many 5s has Louis given to each of the 4 acting categories in the bonus rounds so far.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-10396884872610839322020-11-22T05:49:06.708-05:002020-11-22T05:49:06.708-05:00Luke: yeah I didn’t even notice, I would’ve tried ...Luke: yeah I didn’t even notice, I would’ve tried for a more special film if I’d known otherwise. <br /><br />Thurman’s a strong 4.5 for me and makes my lineup. I’m intrigued as to the Vanya performances though. <br /><br />Also really awesome that two indigenous actors have won this year for Louis, wish the Academy would do that more often in turn. Indigenous actors from everywhere seem to get the shittiest treatment. Calvin Lawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11392068349392739631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-32780263727322809022020-11-22T05:22:20.601-05:002020-11-22T05:22:20.601-05:00A rewatch of Pulp Fiction has made Uma Thurman a 5...A rewatch of Pulp Fiction has made Uma Thurman a 5 and my win for Supporting Actress. Also, I'm glad to see Willis switched over to lead. Matt Mustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03310037237651825936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-26783867938043254102020-11-22T04:04:55.451-05:002020-11-22T04:04:55.451-05:00Louis, Rating and thoughts on Liam Neeson in Nell....Louis, Rating and thoughts on Liam Neeson in Nell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2457552600380761837.post-20222220149400266702020-11-22T03:44:22.603-05:002020-11-22T03:44:22.603-05:00Louis: Where would you rank Jamie Lee Curtis in Tr...Louis: Where would you rank Jamie Lee Curtis in True Lies.Luke Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07075392435078135757noreply@blogger.com